1
|
Yao LJ, Zhu XD, Zhou LM, Zhang LL, Liu NN, Chen M, Wang JY, Hu SJ. Short-term efficacy of microwave ablation in the treatment of liver cancer and its effect on immune function. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12:3395-3402. [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i18.3395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatectomy is the first choice for treating liver cancer. However, inflammatory factors, released in response to pain stimulation, may suppress perioperative immune function and affect the prognosis of patients undergoing hepatectomies.
AIM To determine the short-term efficacy of microwave ablation in the treatment of liver cancer and its effect on immune function.
METHODS Clinical data from patients with liver cancer admitted to Suzhou Ninth People’s Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-five patients underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver cancer (liver cancer resection group) and 35 patients underwent medical image-guided microwave ablation (liver cancer ablation group). The short-term efficacy, complications, liver function, and immune function indices before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS One month after treatment, 19 patients experienced complete remission (CR), 8 patients experienced partial remission (PR), 6 patients experienced stable disease (SD), and 2 patients experienced disease progression (PD) in the liver cancer resection group. In the liver cancer ablation group, 21 patients experienced CR, 9 patients experienced PR, 3 patients experienced SD, and 2 patients experienced PD. No significant differences in efficacy and complications were detected between the liver cancer ablation and liver cancer resection groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, total bilirubin (41.24 ± 7.35 vs 49.18 ± 8.64 μmol/L, P < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (30.85 ± 6.23 vs 42.32 ± 7.56 U/L, P < 0.001), CD4+ (43.95 ± 5.72 vs 35.27 ± 5.56, P < 0.001), CD8+ (20.38 ± 3.91 vs 22.75 ± 4.62, P < 0.001), and CD4+/CD8+ (2.16 ± 0.39 vs 1.55 ± 0.32, P < 0.001) were significantly different between the liver cancer ablation and liver cancer resection groups.
CONCLUSION The short-term efficacy and safety of microwave ablation and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of liver cancer are similar, but liver function recovers quickly after microwave ablation, and microwave ablation may enhance immune function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Jun Yao
- Department of Oncology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xiao-Ding Zhu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Suzhou Xiangcheng District Rehabilitation Hospital, Suzhou 215132, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Liu-Min Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Li-Li Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Na-Na Liu
- Department of Oncology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Oncology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jia-Ying Wang
- Department of Oncology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Shao-Jun Hu
- Department of Oncology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khosla D, Misra S, Chu PL, Guan P, Nada R, Gupta R, Kaewnarin K, Ko TK, Heng HL, Srinivasalu VK, Kapoor R, Singh D, Klanrit P, Sampattavanich S, Tan J, Kongpetch S, Jusakul A, Teh BT, Chan JY, Hong JH. Cholangiocarcinoma: Recent Advances in Molecular Pathobiology and Therapeutic Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:801. [PMID: 38398194 PMCID: PMC10887007 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) pose a complex challenge in oncology due to diverse etiologies, necessitating tailored therapeutic approaches. This review discusses the risk factors, molecular pathology, and current therapeutic options for CCA and explores the emerging strategies encompassing targeted therapies, immunotherapy, novel compounds from natural sources, and modulation of gut microbiota. CCA are driven by an intricate landscape of genetic mutations, epigenetic dysregulation, and post-transcriptional modification, which differs based on geography (e.g., for liver fluke versus non-liver fluke-driven CCA) and exposure to environmental carcinogens (e.g., exposure to aristolochic acid). Liquid biopsy, including circulating cell-free DNA, is a potential diagnostic tool for CCA, which warrants further investigations. Currently, surgical resection is the primary curative treatment for CCA despite the technical challenges. Adjuvant chemotherapy, including cisplatin and gemcitabine, is standard for advanced, unresectable, or recurrent CCA. Second-line therapy options, such as FOLFOX (oxaliplatin and 5-FU), and the significance of radiation therapy in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and palliative settings are also discussed. This review underscores the need for personalized therapies and demonstrates the shift towards precision medicine in CCA treatment. The development of targeted therapies, including FDA-approved drugs inhibiting FGFR2 gene fusions and IDH1 mutations, is of major research focus. Investigations into immune checkpoint inhibitors have also revealed potential clinical benefits, although improvements in survival remain elusive, especially across patient demographics. Novel compounds from natural sources exhibit anti-CCA activity, while microbiota dysbiosis emerges as a potential contributor to CCA progression, necessitating further exploration of their direct impact and mechanisms through in-depth research and clinical studies. In the future, extensive translational research efforts are imperative to bridge existing gaps and optimize therapeutic strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes for this complex malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divya Khosla
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Shagun Misra
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Pek Lim Chu
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| | - Peiyong Guan
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore
| | - Ritambhra Nada
- Department of Histopathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Rajesh Gupta
- Department of GI Surgery, HPB, and Liver Transplantation, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Khwanta Kaewnarin
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Biodiversity Medicine, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Tun Kiat Ko
- Cancer Discovery Hub, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Hong Lee Heng
- Laboratory of Cancer Epigenome, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Vijay Kumar Srinivasalu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Center, NH Health City Campus, Bommasandra, Bangalore 560099, India
| | - Rakesh Kapoor
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Deepika Singh
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Biodiversity Medicine, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Poramate Klanrit
- Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP), Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Somponnat Sampattavanich
- Siriraj Center of Research Excellence for Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 73170, Thailand
| | - Jing Tan
- Laboratory of Cancer Epigenome, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Sarinya Kongpetch
- Cholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Apinya Jusakul
- Cholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
- Centre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Bin Tean Teh
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore
- Laboratory of Cancer Epigenome, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138673, Singapore
| | - Jason Yongsheng Chan
- Cancer Discovery Hub, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Jing Han Hong
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martinelli S, Lamminpää I, Dübüş EN, Sarıkaya D, Niccolai E. Synergistic Strategies for Gastrointestinal Cancer Care: Unveiling the Benefits of Immunonutrition and Microbiota Modulation. Nutrients 2023; 15:4408. [PMID: 37892482 PMCID: PMC10610426 DOI: 10.3390/nu15204408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a group of highly prevalent malignant tumors affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Globally, one in four cancer cases and one in three cancer deaths are estimated to be GI cancers. They can alter digestive and absorption functions, leading to severe malnutrition which may worsen the prognosis of the patients. Therefore, nutritional intervention and monitoring play a fundamental role in managing metabolic alterations and cancer symptoms, as well as minimizing side effects and increasing the effectiveness of chemotherapy. In this scenario, the use of immunonutrients that are able to modulate the immune system and the modification/regulation of the gut microbiota composition have gained attention as a possible strategy to improve the conditions of these patients. The complex interaction between nutrients and microbiota might contribute to maintaining the homeostasis of each individual's immune system; therefore, concurrent use of specific nutrients in combination with traditional cancer treatments may synergistically improve the overall care of GI cancer patients. This work aims to review and discuss the role of immunonutrition and microbiota modulation in improving nutritional status, postoperative recovery, and response to therapies in patients with GI cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Martinelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (S.M.); (I.L.)
| | - Ingrid Lamminpää
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (S.M.); (I.L.)
| | - Eda Nur Dübüş
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey; (E.N.D.); (D.S.)
| | - Dilara Sarıkaya
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey; (E.N.D.); (D.S.)
| | - Elena Niccolai
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (S.M.); (I.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mareschal J, Hemmer A, Douissard J, Dupertuis YM, Collet TH, Koessler T, Toso C, Ris F, Genton L. Surgical Prehabilitation in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers: Impact of Unimodal and Multimodal Programs on Postoperative Outcomes and Prospects for New Therapeutic Strategies-A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061881. [PMID: 36980767 PMCID: PMC10047365 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The advantages of prehabilitation in surgical oncology are unclear. This systematic review aims to (1) evaluate the latest evidence of preoperative prehabilitation interventions on postoperative outcomes after gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery and (2) discuss new potential therapeutic targets as part of prehabilitation. Randomized controlled trials published between January 2017 and August 2022 were identified through Medline. The population of interest was oncological patients undergoing GI surgery. Trials were considered if they evaluated prehabilitation interventions (nutrition, physical activity, probiotics and symbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and ghrelin receptor agonists), alone or combined, on postoperative outcomes. Out of 1180 records initially identified, 15 studies were retained. Evidence for the benefits of unimodal interventions was limited. Preoperative multimodal programs, including nutrition and physical activity with or without psychological support, showed improvement in postoperative physical performance, muscle strength, and quality of life in patients with esophagogastric and colorectal cancers. However, there was no benefit for postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, hospital readmissions, and mortality. No trial evaluated the impact of fecal microbiota transplantation or oral ghrelin receptor agonists. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings, identify patients who are more likely to benefit from surgical prehabilitation, and harmonize interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Mareschal
- Clinical Nutrition, Service of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Nutrition and Therapeutic Education, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra Hemmer
- Clinical Nutrition, Service of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Nutrition and Therapeutic Education, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Douissard
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Freeman Hospital-Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Yves Marc Dupertuis
- Clinical Nutrition, Service of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Nutrition and Therapeutic Education, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tinh-Hai Collet
- Clinical Nutrition, Service of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Nutrition and Therapeutic Education, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Diabetes Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thibaud Koessler
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian Toso
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frédéric Ris
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laurence Genton
- Clinical Nutrition, Service of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Nutrition and Therapeutic Education, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Diabetes Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Role of Probiotics in Inflammation Associated with Major Surgery: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2023; 15:nu15061331. [PMID: 36986061 PMCID: PMC10059922 DOI: 10.3390/nu15061331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Gut microbiota is well-known for its ability to maintain intestinal homeostasis. However, the disruption of this homeostasis, known as dysbiosis, leads to multiple consequences, including local and systemic inflammation. Surgery-induced inflammation is a major concern for patients, as it leads to many infectious and non-infectious complications. Objective: The purpose of this review was to explore the role of probiotics and symbiotics in surgery-induced inflammation and to determine if their use is effective in combatting inflammation and its complications Methods and Materials: A literature search was conducted, and articles published only in English, until December 2022 were included. The results are reported in the form of a narrative review. Results: The perioperative use of probiotics and/or symbiotics results in lower risk of infectious complications, including reduced rates of surgical site infections, respiratory and urinary tract infections, shorter hospital stays, and fewer days of antibiotic administration. It also contributes to reducing non-infectious complications, as it mitigates systemic and local inflammation via maintenance of the intestinal barrier, improves intestinal mobility, and is associated with lower rates of postoperative pain and anastomotic leak. Conclusions: Restoring gut microbiota after disruptions caused by surgery may accelerate local healing processes, attenuate systemic inflammation, and may thus prove beneficial to certain populations.
Collapse
|
6
|
Li S, Yue H, Wang S, Li X, Wang X, Guo P, Ma G, Wei W. Advances of bacteria-based delivery systems for modulating tumor microenvironment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 188:114444. [PMID: 35817215 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The components and hospitable properties of tumor microenvironment (TME) are associated with tumor progression. Recently, TME modulating vectors and strategies have garnished significant attention in cancer therapy. Although a pilot work has reviewed TME regulation via nanoparticle-based delivery systems, there is no systematical review that summarizes the natural bacteria-based anti-tumor system to modulate TME. In this review, we conclude the strategies of bacterial carriers (including whole bacteria, bacterial skeleton and bacterial components) to regulate TME from the perspective of TME components and hospitable properties, and the clinical trials of bacteria-mediated cancer therapy. Current challenges and future prospects for the design of bacteria-based carriers are also proposed that provide critical insights into this natural delivery system and related translation from the bench to the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuping Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China; Key Laboratory of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biotechnology Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, PR China
| | - Hua Yue
- State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China; School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
| | - Shuang Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China
| | - Xin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China
| | - Xiaojun Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, PR China
| | - Peilin Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China; School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
| | - Guanghui Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China; School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China.
| | - Wei Wei
- State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China; School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|