Subintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a systematic review

Introduction of novel intravascular ultrasound preceding with angled guiding catheter (I-PAD) technique to treat chronic total occlusions in peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

The optimal endovascular treatment (EVT) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) has remained unestablished. We encountered a patient with PAD in whom CTO was successfully treated using a novel technique that involved intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and angled guiding catheter: IVUS Preceding with Angled guiDing catheter (I-PAD) technique.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 74-year-old male presented with intermittent claudication attributed to CTO of the right external iliac artery. EVT was performed via the right common femoral artery. We retrogradely advanced the I-PAD system (i.e. partially extending the IVUS transducer portion from the tip of the angled guiding catheter) in the CTO lesion under the real-time guidance of IVUS imaging. We successfully traversed the CTO lesion without the use of a guidewire in approximately three minutes. The procedure concluded successfully without any procedure-related complications, following optimal stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

The I-PAD might be an effective technique to accurately, quickly, and safely pass through CTO lesions.

Performance of BeBack Crossing Catheter in Chronic Total Occlusion in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE

To describe a single-center experience in the treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) with the application of BeBack catheter (Bentley InnoMed, Germany) in patients with arterial chronic total occlusion (CTO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent limb revascularizations using the BeBack catheter between 2015 and 2022. All patients had an initial failed attempt using a traditional guidewire and catheter technique. Technical success was considered whenever a successful re-entry or lesion crossing using the study device was achieved. Procedural success was defined as recanalization of the occluded artery with residual stenosis of less than 30%, and improvement in ankle-brachial index (ABI) after 24 hours. A Rutherford score was assigned to each limb and affected anatomical segments and lesion length were documented. Procedural access sites and complications were noted.

RESULTS

The study included 72 patients who underwent 78 procedures using the BeBack crossing catheter. Procedural success was achieved in 91% of cases, with a technical success rate of 92.3%. The most frequently involved occluded segments were the femoral and popliteal arteries. The average ABI improved from 0.59 to 0.95 after the procedure. The most used access site was the contralateral femoral, and the BeBack catheter was employed on 85 occasions. Only 1 patient suffered a severe immediate adverse effect, and during the 30-day follow-up period, 2 patients needed reintervention. Unfortunately, 3 patients died during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The BeBack catheter offers a viable option for the treatment of patients with chronic total occlusion, with high procedural success and a low complication rate.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The BeBack catheter presents a notable advancement for clinicians managing chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and arterial chronic total occlusion (CTO), showcasing over 90% procedural and technical success rates in this study. Its adept ability to navigate and recanalize occluded segments provides a robust alternative, especially when traditional techniques falter. This innovation may chane clinical strategies in vascular interventions, offering an efficient and reliable option, thereby potentially enhancing patient outcomes in limb revascularizations.

A case of chronic total occlusion in popliteal artery recanalized by double snare piercing technique

BACKGROUND

Although majority of cases with chronic total occlusion (CTO) in femoro-popliteal lesion were treated with antegrade approach only, some lesions require alternative approach due to its complexity. Bi-directional approach is useful on endovascular therapy (EVT) for CTO; however guidewire passage through the lesion is impossible in some challenging cases. The present case shows a successful re-entry technique utilizing two snare catheters from an antegrade and retrograde access site (double snare piecing technique).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 79-year-old woman with right leg intermittent claudication (Rutherford category IV), who had undergone unsuccessful EVT for popliteal CTO, required another EVT for the worsening symptom. Following the failed conventional crossing technique (wire knuckle technique, intravascular-ultrasound-guided wiring, and controlled antegrade and retrograde subintimal tracking technique), two snare catheters were placed and the snare loops were pierced by a puncture needle percutaneously. After an 0.014 wire was inserted into the needle, the needle was withdrawn. The wire was pulled from the retrograde side and was externalized. Then, the antegrade snare catheter was pulled and externalized, to make the wire across the lesion. After that, a microcatheter was advanced along the externalized wire from the retrograde side and cross the lesion. The wire was replaced with a new wire, which completely created pull-through system. After the hemostasis by balloon inflation and lesion preparation, this procedure was completed with an endoluminal-covered stent and two inter-woven stents. The re-entry site was covered by the inter-woven stent. Her symptoms improved after the procedure, and the lesion has not developed restenosis at 2-years follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This re-entry technique of puncturing two snare loops (double snare piercing technique) might be effective for achieving successful passage through challenging femoropopliteal CTO cases.

Technical success and associated economic implications of conventional re-entry devices in subintimal recanalization of femoro-popliteal chronic total occlusions

PURPOSE

Re-entry devices contribute to the high success rate of subintimal recanalization of chronic total occlusions (CTO). However, to date, there are no studies comparing the available conventional re-entry devices concerning the impact of their technical success on economic aspects, as these devices differ greatly in their acquisition costs. This prospective observational study intends to contribute to this question.

METHODS

Prior to the start of the prospective study, all previous applications of the Outback® in femoro-popliteal CTO since its introduction to our hospital were analyzed retrospectively (n = 31). From June 2018 until January 2020, all patients with femoro-popliteal CTO treated with clear subintimal recanalization were included (n = 109). In the case of failed spontaneous re-entry, either the OffRoad® (study arm I, n = 20) or the Enteer® catheter (study arm II, n = 20) was used. If assisted re-entry failed, the Outback® device was used as a bailout. Baseline demographic and clinical data, morphologic characteristics, and technical success were documented. Additional per-patient costs due to the use of re-entry devices were analyzed.

RESULTS

A retrospective evaluation of all Outback® applications revealed a technical success rate of 97% (30/31). In the prospective study, 63% (68/109) were successfully treated without using re-entry devices. The overall procedural success was 95% (103/109). In study arm I, the OffRoad® achieved a success rate of 45% (9/20), with a subsequent successful application of the Outback® in 80% (8/10) of the failed cases. In study arm II, the Enteer® was successfully employed in 60% (12/20) of cases, and the Outback® was then used successfully in a further 62% (5/8) of cases. Too large a distance between the device and the target lumen was a knockout criterion for all tested devices, leading to a subgroup analysis with the exclusion of three cases, resulting in a success rate of 47% for the OffRoad® and 67% for the Enteer® device. Furthermore, in severe calcification, only the Outback® reliably enabled revascularization. Significant savings of almost €600 were only achieved in study arm II according to German prices.

CONCLUSION

With proper patient selection, a gradual approach with the Enteer® as the primarily used device, with the Outback® used additionally in case of failure, leads to significant savings and can be recommended. In severe calcification, the Outback® should be used as the primary device.

Trans-pedal access for endovascular revascularization in complex infra-popliteal lesions in critically ischemic limb: A cohort study

Background

critical limb ischemia is one of the most challenging cases we face nowadays with high risk for amputation, retrograde trans-pedal angioplasty offers an alternative technique after failure of traditional ante-grade angioplasty.

Patients and Methods

96 patients underwent trans-pedal or trans-tibial retrograde angioplasty after failure of the traditional ante-grade angioplasty with the aid of US, 21-gauge needle and 0.018 wire through sheath-less approach as a last chance for revascularization.

Results

clinical success or improvement in 77 cases (80.2%), and in other 19 cases (19.8%) there was no clinical success or improvement. The technical success was achieved in 81 cases with percentage of (84.4%), and not achieved in 15 cases (15.6%) only.

Conclusions

Retrograde Trans-pedal angioplasty is an efficient, safe, and practical procedure with a high technical success and a relatively minimal procedural adverse effect.

•

retrograde trans-pedal angioplasty offers an alternative technique after failure of traditional ante-grade angioplasty.

•

Retrograde Trans-pedal angioplasty is an efficient, safe, and practical procedure

Technical note: An alternative use of a steerable homemade for the treatment of chronic total occlusion of an iliac artery

INTRODUCTION

The complexity of the peripheral recanalization comes from the difficulty to cross the lesion or get into the subintimal space and its re-entry afterward, with a high risk of complications like artery dissection and/or rupture, which are life-threatening complications. To our knowledge, we report the first case of the use of a homemade steerable sheath for the successful revascularization of a heavy chronic total occlusion in a patient with unsuitable upper vascular access.

TECHNIQUE

By contralateral vascular access and the use of a 6Fr 55-cm Cook Flexor sheath and a pre-looped 0.014" choice guidewire, a steerable homemade sheath was used to achieve the support, pushability, and steer needed to access the subintimal space at the origin of a heavy occluded common iliac artery, thus giving us the ability to cross the lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

The homemade steerable sheath is feasible, quick, cheap, and easy to use, sparing the use of re-entry systems and catheters for the attempts of subintimal navigation. In addition, this technique gives the advantage to steer the catheters and wires as needed, avoiding non-desired re-entry points with secondary collaterals lumen compromise or extensive dissections.

Technical Success of the GoBack™ Crossing Catheter in Chronic Total Occlusion in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

PURPOSE

To assess the technical success of GoBack™ crossing catheter in chronic total occlusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients treated for chronic total occlusions (CTO) with the application of the GoBack™ crossing catheter (Upstream Peripheral Technologies, Haifa, Israel) between May 2020 and January 2021 was performed. Sixteen GoBack catheters were applied in twelve limbs in 12 patients (ten men, average age 75.7 years). Treated limbs were classified as Rutherford Category 5 and 6 in ten patients and four in two patients. Average occlusion length was 287 mm (62-466). All occluded arteries were heavily calcified. Technical success was defined as successful application of the GoBack catheter for lesion crossing or luminal reentry.

RESULTS

Successful application of the four French catheter was achieved in 11 of the 12 cases (92%) for reentry in external iliac (1), superficial femoral (2), popliteal (2) and posterior tibial (1) arteries in six out of six cases (100%) and lesion crossing in popliteal (4), peroneal (1) and posterior tibial arteries in five out of six cases (83%). The 2.9 Fr catheter was successfully applied once out of four (25%) in lesion crossing in the posterior tibial artery.

CONCLUSION

The GoBack™ 4 Fr crossing catheter in revascularization of CLI patients with CTO could be valuable when manual crossing or reentry is unsuccessful and is applicable from any access site.

Efficacy of Fusion Imaging in Endovascular Revascularization of the Superficial Femoral Artery

BACKGROUND

The demand for endovascular revascularization (ER) to treat peripheral artery disease (PAD) has steadily increased. However, ER comes at the cost of increased contrast and radiation exposure, particularly in more complex cases. Fusion imaging is a new technology that may address these issues. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fusion imaging in ER of the superficial femoral artery (SFA).

METHODS

Patients with PAD undergoing ER of the SFA from February 2016 to July 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. A group of patients treated using fusion imaging was compared with a control group treated without fusion imaging. The primary end points were the contrast dose, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and operative time.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients (fusion group, n = 26; control group, n = 25) underwent ER during the study period. Significantly lower iodinated contrast doses were observed in the fusion than in the control group (56.1 ± 23.7 vs. 87.9 ± 44.9 mL; P = 0.003), as well as significantly shorter fluoroscopy times (21.2 ± 11.1 vs. 44.9 ± 31.4 min; P = 0.001), lower radiation exposure (29.9 ± 8.9 vs. 122.2 ± 223.1 mGy; P = 0.04), and shorter operative times (88.3 ± 32.1 vs. 126.1 ± 66.8 min; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of fusion imaging technology during ER of the SFA can significantly reduce the contrast dose, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and operative time.

Retrograde Revascularization of Tibial Arteries in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: Plantar-Arch Versus Transpedal Approach

PURPOSE

To compare retrograde plantar-arch and transpedal-access approach for revascularization of below-the-knee (BTK) arteries in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) after a failed antegrade approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively we identified 811 patients who underwent BTK revascularization between 1/2014 and 1/2020. In 115/811 patients (14.2%), antegrade revascularization of at least 1 tibial artery had failed. In 67/115 (58.3%), patients retrograde access to the target vessel was achieved via the femoral access and the plantar-arch (PLANTAR-group); and in 48/115 patients (41.7%) retrograde revascularization was performed by an additional retrograde puncture (TRANSPEDAL-group). Comorbidities, presence of calcification at pedal-plantar-loop/transpedal-access-site, and tibial-target-lesion was recorded. Endpoints were technical success (PLANTAR-group: crossing the plantar-arch; TRANSPEDAL-group: intravascular placement of the pedal access sheath), procedural success [residual stenosis <30% after plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)], and procedural complications limb salvage and survival. Correlations between calcification at access site/tibial-target-lesion and technical/procedural-success were tested.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 50/67 (75%) patients of the PLANTAR-group and in 39/48 (81%) patients of the TRANSPEDAL-group (p=0.1). Procedural success was obtained in 23/67 (34%) patients of the PLANTAR-group and in 25/48 (52%) patients of the TRANSPEDAL-group (p=0.04). In 14/49 (29%) cases with calcification at the pedal-plantar loop, technical success was not achieved (p=0.04), and in 33/44 (75%) patients with calcification at the tibial-target-lesion, procedural success was not attained (PLANTAR-group) (p=0.026). In the TRANSPEDAL-group, correlations between calcification at access site/tibial-target-lesion and technical/procedural-success were not observed (p=0.2/p=0.4). In the PLANTAR-group, minor complications occurred in 13/67 (19%) and in the TRANSPEDAL-group in 4/48 patients (8%) (p=0.08). Limb salvage at 12 (18) months was 90% (82%) (PLANTAR-group; 95%CI 15.771-18.061) and 84% (76%) (TRANSPEDAL-group; 95%CI 14.475-17.823) (Log-rank p=0.46). Survival at 12 (18) months was 94% (86%) (PLANTAR-group; 95%CI 16.642-18.337) and 85% (77%) (TRANSPEDAL; 95%CI 14.296-17.621) (Log-rank p=0.098).

CONCLUSION

Procedural success was significantly higher using the transpedal-access approach. Calcifications at pedal-plantar loop and target-lesion significantly influenced technical/procedural failure using the plantar-arch approach. No significant difference between both retrograde techniques in terms of feasibility, safety, and limb salvage/survival was found.

Retrograde Popliteal Access for Challenging Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion

Retrograde popliteal access has long been established as an alternative to the antegrade approach to occlusive lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA). However, early reports with high complication rates (dissection, hematomas, aneurysms, and arteriovenous shunts at the puncture site) reduced enthusiasm for this technique. In recent years, with the development of thinner sheaths and low profile angioplasty devices, retrograde popliteal access has resurfaced as a viable technique, mostly in combination with or after failure of the more classical antegrade approach. In this retrospective study, we will report the safety and efficacy of the retrograde popliteal approach in the treatment of superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusions, in 13 consecutive patients between January 2017 and January 2021. The results showed 100% successful puncture of the popliteal artery and 100% successful recanalization and stenting of the superficial femoral artery with a total of 2 complications related to the puncture site and zero periprocedural mortality. In conclusion, the retrograde popliteal approach appears to be an effective and safe alternative to the common SFA complete total occlusion (CTO) treatment approach.

Transradial endovascular intervention: Results from the Radial accEss for nAvigation to your CHosen lesion for Peripheral Vascular Intervention (REACH PVI) study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The transradial approach has been proposed as an alternative to traditional transfemoral access for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in several catheterization procedures. Historically, extended length devices for lower limb endovascular interventions have been limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the acute clinical outcomes of orbital atherectomy (OA) via transradial access (TRA) for the treatment of lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD).

METHODS/MATERIALS

REACH PVI was a multicenter, prospective, observational study (NCT03943160) including subjects with PAD and target lesion morphology appropriate for OA. All patients were followed post-procedure through the first standard of care follow-up visit.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled. In most cases the indication for intervention was disabling claudication (74.0%). Overall, 50 target lesions were treated, 92.0% of lesions were femoropopliteal and 8.0% were infrapopliteal. The average lesion length was 98.3 ± 87.5 mm and 78.0% of the lesions were severely calcified. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 98.0% of target lesions, while a stent was deployed in 16.0%. Treatment success was 98.0%; in only one case the result was sub-optimal (>30% stenosis with stent placement) and a significant dissection was reported. No serious distal embolization, serious thrombus formation or serious acute vessel closure were observed intra- or post-procedurally.

CONCLUSIONS

Transradial OA followed by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for lower extremity PAD is feasible and demonstrates a favorable safety profile. Extended length devices such as the Extended Length Orbital Atherectomy System could further facilitate transradial endovascular procedures by increasing its spectrum of application.

Ultrasound-Guided Retrograde Infrapopliteal Artery Access for Recanalization of Complex Femoral-Popliteal Artery Occlusions

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to review the outcomes of femoral-popliteal artery (FPA) interventions using an ultrasound (US)-guided retrograde infrapopliteal artery access after the failure of an antegrade recanalization.

METHODS

From Jan 2016 to Jan 2019, 37 patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the FPA underwent ultrasound (US)-guided retrograde infrapopliteal artery access after failure of an antegrade procedure. Treated limbs were classified as Rutherford class 5 or 6 (29.7%) and class 4 (62.2%). Data collected included success rate and time to access using US. Immediate in-hospital and follow-up outcomes were also documented.

RESULTS

US-guided retrograde infrapopliteal artery access was successful in 100% of the patients (anterior tibial = 11, posterior tibial = 19, Peroneal = 4, Dorsalis pedis = 3). Retrograde revascularization was achieved in all 37 patients (100%) using balloon angioplasty (17/37, 45.9%) and additional stent placement (20/37, 54.1%). Ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements changed from 0.25 ± 0.1 preinterventionally to 0.75 ± 0.07 at 1 day postinterventionally (<0.001). Minor complications occurred in 2/37 patients (5.4%) including one bleeding and vasospasm at the posterior tibial artery, both of which were treated conservatively. No patient experienced access-related thrombosis, aneurysm, compartment syndrome or death. Thirty of 37 (81%) patients completed for at least 12 months of follow-up. None of the successful revascularized patients had major or minor amputations during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided retrograde infrapopliteal artery access is a safe and successful technique, which expands revascularization options after the failure of conventional endovascular antegrade approaches.

A Systematic Histopathologic Evaluation of Type-A Aortic Dissections Implies a Uniform Multiple-Hit Causation

(1) Background: The pathophysiologic basis of an acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is largely unknown. In an effort to evaluate vessel wall defects, we systematically studied aortic specimens in TAAD patients. (2) Methods: Ascending aortic wall specimens (n = 58, mean age 63 years) with TAAD were collected. Autopsy tissues (n = 17, mean age 63 years) served as controls. All sections were studied histopathologically. (3) Results: Pathomorphology in TAAD showed predominantly moderate elastic fiber fragmentation/loss, elastic fiber thinning, elastic fiber degeneration, mucoid extracellular matrix accumulation, smooth muscle cell nuclei loss, and overall medial degeneration. The control group showed significantly fewer signs of those histopathological features (none-mild, p = 0.00). It was concluded that the dissection plane consistently coincides with the vasa vasorum network, and that TAAD associates with a significantly thinner intimal layer p = 0.005). (4) Conclusions: On the basis of the systematic evaluation and the consistent presence of diffuse, pre-existing medial defects, we hypothesize that TAAD relates to a developmental defect of the ascending aorta and is caused by a triple-hit mechanism that involves (I) an intimal tear; and (II) a diseased media, which allows (III) propagation of the tear towards the plane of the vasa vasorum where the dissection further progresses.

Technical Success and Complication Rates of Retrograde Arterial Access for Endovascular Therapy for Critical Limb Ischaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Antegrade crossing techniques via transfemoral access are often challenging and may be associated with technical and clinical failure when treating patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI). The objective of this study was to summarise all available literature regarding retrograde endovascular treatment of patients with CLI and to investigate the technical success and complication rate of retrograde access.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central until May 2020. A meta-analysis of 31 observational studies (29 retrospective and two prospective; 26 and five studies with low and moderate risk of bias, respectively) was conducted with random effects modelling. The incidence of adverse events peri-procedurally and during follow up were calculated.

RESULTS

The 31 studies enrolled 1 910 patients who were treated endovascularly for femoropopliteal and/or infrapopliteal lesions causing CLI. Most of the patients had diabetes while more than half of the overall population had coronary artery disease and dyslipidaemia. All lesions were located in the infra-inguinal segment and most were chronic total occlusions (96%; 95% CI 85%-100%). Seven studies reported moderate or severe calcification in approximately half of the cases (45%; 95% CI 30%-60%). The overall technical success of the retrograde approach was 96% (18 studies; 95% CI 92%-100%). Perforation, flow limiting dissection, distal embolisation, and local haematoma at the retrograde access site were infrequent and observed in 2.1%, 0.6%, 0.1%, and 1.3% of the patients, respectively. The six month primary patency rate was 78% (five studies; 95% CI 46%-99%), the six month limb salvage rate was 77% (four studies; 95% CI 70%-84%).

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the retrograde or bidirectional antegrade/retrograde approach is safe and effective and facilitates angioplasty when antegrade treatment fails. However, prospective studies with standardised wound care and surveillance protocols are needed to investigate retrograde techniques in patients with CLI who failed antegrade revascularisation, to improve long term limb salvage and survival.

Retrograde Pedal Access via Occluded Arteries in Endovascular Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and technical outcomes of retrograde access via occluded pedal arteries in endovascular treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI) when the conventional antegrade approach fails.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-one patients with CLI (age 69 y ± 10.5; 116 men) who were not surgical candidates and were treated via retrograde pedal access between January 2016 and January 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Seventy patients in whom retrograde access was performed through occluded arteries constituted the occluded group, and 81 patients who were treated via retrograde access from patent arteries constituted the nonoccluded group. Pedal access success, lesion crossing success, angiographic success, overall technical success, and procedure-related complications were evaluated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Pedal access success (74 of 78 vs 83 of 87 attempts; P = .873) and lesion crossing success (64 of 78 vs 77 of 87 lesions; P = .340) were comparable between subgroups. Angiographic success (54 of 78 vs 77 of 87 lesions; P = .012) and overall technical success (48 of 70 vs 72 of 81 patients; P = .004) rates were lower in the occluded group. Procedure-related complications were similar between groups (P = .096).

CONCLUSIONS

Retrograde pedal access from occluded pedal arteries is a feasible option when an antegrade approach fails in endovascular treatment of CLI. Although it has lower technical success, its use enables angiosome-directed therapy and has the potential to improve the outcomes of the procedure.

The Use of Re-entry Devices in Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Endovascular approach is the first-choice treatment in patients suffering from aortoiliac occlusions. Nevertheless, standard endoluminal revascularization fails in treating occlusions in about 20% (1) of cases. Thus, subintimal revascularization can be a solution, but it fails in 25% (2) of cases as well. In the last decades, different devices have been created, in order to ease the cross back into the true lumen, when standard subintimal revascularization does not work or risks to occlude important collateral vessels. Herein, we revise the currently available re-entry devices and their application in the aortoiliac occlusive pathology.

Endovascular Intervention for the Treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) D Femoropopliteal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Advancements in the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions have led to treatment of more complex lesions, particularly long lesions. The aim of this study was to determine the meta-analytic primary patency and need for re-intervention among patients treated for very long lesions (>200 mm) at the femoropopliteal segment and to identify potential risk factors for loss of patency.

METHODS

This study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and the I-square was used to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies comprised of 3029 patients were included. The mean lesion length was 269 mm. The primary patency rate at 30 days, 6 m, 1-, 2- and 5-years of follow-up was 98%, 76%, 62%, 55%, and 39% respectively. The incidence of TLR was 16% at one year and 32% at two years. The secondary patency rate at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years was 85%, 71%, 64%, and 64% respectively. Heparin bonded ePTFE covered stents (69%) and paclitaxel eluting stents (73%) demonstrated higher 1-year primary patency rates than self-expanding nitinol stents (55%) or uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with provisional stenting (54%). Lesions treated with a heparin bonded ePTFE covered stent had statistically significant higher odds of remaining patent at 1-year of follow-up (OR: 2.74; 95%CI: 1.63-4.61; p < 0.001) than lesions treated with BMS or PTA. Patients with long femoropopliteal lesions causing critical limb ischemia (CLI) developed restenosis or occlusion more often than patients treated for claudication (HR: 1.63; 95%CI: 1.06-2.49; p = 0.026) during an average follow-up of 26 months.

CONCLUSION

Primary stenting of femoropopliteal TASC D lesions using drug eluting stents or covered stents results in sustained patency over time. PTA or uncoated nitinol stents demonstrated lower patency rates. However, additional comparative studies are needed to determine the efficacy of newer technologies for the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions and provide evidence for the most optimal treatment approach.

Comparative 12-Month Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Non-Drug-Coated Balloon Revascularization Strategy in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Results From the XLPAD Registry

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy is often the preferred first treatment option for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients. Drug coated balloons (DCB) reduce restenosis rates compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), however DCB use has not been studied systematically in patients with CLTI. Thus, the optimal treatment option for these complex lesions remains controversial.

METHODS

We report on 327 patients with CLTI treated either with DCB (n = 105) or non-DCB (n = 222) for femoropopliteal disease. Data were retrieved from the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry (NCT01904851). Two DCB types were used at the discretion of the operator: Lutonix® (BARD Peripheral Vascular, Inc., Tempe, AZ, USA) and IN.PACT AdmiralTM (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). Odds ratios and the respective 95% confidence interval were synthesized to examine the association between the two groups in terms of all-cause mortality, target limb repeat endovascular or surgical revascularization, target vessel revascularization (TVR), major and minor amputation at 12 months of follow up.

RESULTS

The mean lesion length was 150.0 mm (SD:123.2) and 151.2 mm (SD:108.3) for the DCB and non-DCB group respectively. No difference between the two groups was detected in terms of all-cause mortality (2.86%vs2.7%,p = .94), target limb repeat endovascular or surgical revascularization (16.19%vs12.61%,p = .25), TVR (16.19%vs.11.71%,p = .26) or minor amputation (15.24%vs10.81%,p = .25) at 12 months of follow up. Although a higher incidence of 12 months major amputation was observed in the DCB group (11%vs.4%,p = .01), after adjusting for several risk factors the odds of major amputation were not statistically different between the DCB and non-DCB groups (OR:1.54;95%CI:0.53-4.51;p = .43).

CONCLUSIONS

Both DCB and non-DCB strategies are effective modalities for revascularization of patients with CLTI. No differences were identified between the DCB and non-DCB group in terms of late outcomes during 12 months of follow up.

Mortality and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients treated with endovascular revascularization of the infra-inguinal lower limb arteries from retrograde access

Background

In this trial, our objective was to evaluate the relationship between long-term clinical outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) treated with retrograde endovascular recanalization (ER) of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) regarding the infra-inguinal lower limb arteries and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods

A total of 834 consecutive subjects were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 67.8±10.6 years (62.6% males). COPD was diagnosed in 98 patients (11.7%). The infra-inguinal location included the deep, superficial and common femoral artery, popliteal artery or below the knee arteries. During follow-up, we evaluated major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). MACCE was considered as death, stroke/transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting operation, while MALE regarded amputation, target lesion re-intervention, target vessel re-intervention and surgical action.

Results

The mean follow-up was 1,144.9±664.3 days and the interquartile range was 1,110.5 (504.5–1,734.7). Data were collected between 2006 and 2016. We noticed significant differences in death rates among the COPD and non-COPD groups. The cumulative number of events (deaths) was 12.2%, 17.3%, 18.4%, 22.4%, 23.5%, 23.5% and 23.5% in the COPD group and 6.1%, 7.5%, 10.5%, 11.3%, 11.4% 11.5% and 11.5% in the non-COPD group after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 years of follow-up, and was notably greater for COPD (P=0.0007).

Conclusions

Patients with COPD and PAD treated with the ER and retrograde approach due to CTOs are related to higher mortality than non-COPD patients.

Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs. Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Endovascular Treatment of Common Femoral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic disease of the common femoral artery (CFA), commonly associated with multilevel disease affecting the femoropopliteal segment, can cause claudication or contribute to critical limb ischemia. Although endovascular therapy for the management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been increasingly utilized, its role in CFA lesions remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of drug (DCB) vs non drug coated balloon angioplasty (BA) at the CFA segment.

METHODS

In this two-center study, we identified 154 patients treated either with DCB (n = 47) or BA (n = 107) for CFA lesions. Hazard ratios (HR) and the respective 95% confidence interval (CI) were synthesized to examine the association between the two groups in terms of target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb loss, and major adverse limb event (MALE) at 12 and 24 months of follow up.

RESULTS

This real-world population included a high percentage of patients with critical limb ischemia (43%) and moderate to severe lesion calcification (75%). Adjunctive atherectomy was performed in 97.9% of DCB cases (N = 46/47) and 44.7% of BA cases (N = 51/114). The overall procedural success rate was 95% without any differences between the two groups. Post-angioplasty dissections were observed in 15 cases [DCB: 8.5% (N = 4/47) vs BA: 9.7% (N = 11/113); p = .81], while distal embolization occurred in one patient in the DCB group and one in the BA group (p = .52). Provisional stenting was more commonly necessary in BA vs. DCB cases (12.3% vs 2.13%, p = .044). Physiologic assessment during follow up demonstrated a better mean 2-year ABI for the DCB group (mean: 0.9; SD: 0.2) vs BA group (mean: 0.6; SD: 0.4), although statistical significance was not reached (p = .06). No difference between the two groups was detected in terms of freedom from TLR (DCB: 75.5% vs BA: 86.8%; HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.46-3.67; p = .61), freedom from limb loss (DCB: 83.8% vs BA: 83.6%; HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.36-2.99; p = .94) or freedom from MALE (DCB: 83.5% vs BA: 78%; HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.26-1.99; p = .53) at 24 m of follow up. However, at the end of follow up more deaths were observed in patients treated with BA than DCB (DCB: 14.9% vs BA: 31.7%; p = .03). Patients who required provisional stenting were at higher risk for limb loss 2 years after the initial procedure (multivariate: HR: 4.54; 95% CI: 1.09-18.85; p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Both DCB and non-DCB strategies are effective modalities for revascularization of patients with CFA lesions. Larger prospective studies are necessary to determine the relative benefit, if any, of drug-eluting technologies for the treatment of common femoral artery disease.

Predictors of mortality and outcomes after retrograde endovascular angioplasty in patients with peripheral artery disease

Introduction

Endovascular revascularization (ER) techniques in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) have been developed and became more accessible in recent years. The ER is a first-line treatment in the majority of patients with symptomatic PAD. However, data on assessment of predictors of long-term outcomes of retrograde ER in patients with PAD are scarce.

Aim

To evaluate predictors of long-term outcomes of retrograde ER in patients with chronic total occlusion in lower limb arteries.

Material and methods

We analyzed data of 834 patients who underwent retrograde ER. Baseline clinical characteristics and procedural data were collected. Patients were followed up for 36 months, and the primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

Results

All patients were symptomatic and had failed antegrade ER. The procedural success rate was 92%. Cumulative all-cause mortality was 13.4% at 36-month follow-up. In multivariate analysis history of stroke, Rutherford category, chronic limb ischemia, chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and previous ER of other lesion were independent predictors of a higher mortality rate after 36 months (hazard ratio (HR) for stroke 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55–3.66; p = 0.0002; HR for age per 10 years 1.37, 95% CI: 1.15–1.64; p = 0.0002; HR for Rutherford category 1.63, 95% CI: 1.35–1.98; p < 0.0001, HR for chronic limb ischemia 0.44, 95% CI: 0.25–0.8, p = 0.007; HR for CKD 1.73, 95% CI: 1.14–2.56, p = 0.01; HR for COPD 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5–3.7, p = 0.0004; HR for previous ER 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35–0.94, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

History of stroke, Rutherford category, chronic limb ischemia, CKD, COPD, and previous ER of other lesion were independently associated with increased risk of all-cause death.

Combined percutaneous direct puncture of occluded artery - antegrade intervention for recanalization of below the knee arteries

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the technical success of the combined percutaneous direct puncture of occluded artery - antegrade intervention technique, as well as the clinical effectiveness of treatment, on the basis of changes in the Rutherford classification.

METHODS

Between June 2015 and July 2018, 441 patients underwent endovascular recanalization due to lower limb peripheral arterial disease at our center. Of these, 18 patients (4%; 15 males, 3 females; mean age, 63.2 years) had failed antegrade recanalization and percutaneous retrograde access because of long segment occlusion, arterial rupture or dissection. Combined percutaneous direct puncture of occluded artery and antegrade approach was applied to these patients. Clinical follow-up examinations were performed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 22.8±10.9 months. The mean procedure time was 93.6±28.2 min. Technical success was achieved in 14 patients (78%). Complete restoration of arterial flow in the punctured vessel could not be achieved in 4 patients (22%). Minor complications occurred in 4 of 18 procedures (22%). Amputation-free survival and limb salvage rates (83.3% and 100%, respectively) were the same for 12 and 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Technical success in lower limb peripheral arterial disease may be improved with the use of a combined percutaneous direct puncture of occluded artery - antegrade intervention, particularly for patients in whom other techniques are not a viable option.

Femoropopliteal CTO Subintimal Recanalization Using a Homemade Reentry Device

A case of a femoropopliteal recanalization procedure using a new bailout technical maneuver to aid reentry into the true lumen is described. After a failed standard reentry attempt, at the level of the vessel reconstitution in the subintimal space, the guidewire was exchanged for a GooseNeck Snare Kit. A needle was inserted across the target artery, piercing both arterial walls and passing through the snare loop. Once the needle had exited the artery, a wire was inserted and the needle withdrawn. The snare was closed, withdrawn, and the wire externalized through the femoral access. Finally, a catheter was advanced from the antegrade sheath up to the arterial reconstitution. Selective injection at the site of reentry confirmed the intraluminal position, and the procedure was successfully completed from the antegrade sheath.

Long Chronic Total Occlusions: Revascularization Strategies

The treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a complex topic with multiple treatment techniques and treatment strategies. The interventionalist treating patients with PAD should have both a defined treatment algorithm and multiple techniques available for crossing these challenging lesions. This article will cover techniques for treating CTOs and provide an overview of current available evidence.

Comparison of perfusion values after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty according to the severity of ischaemia in the diabetic foot

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is now more frequently used to improve tissue perfusion in ischemic diabetic feet. However, there are concerns about its feasibility and effectiveness in severely ischaemic feet. This study aimed to compare the perfusion values after PTA according to the ischaemic degree of diabetic feet. This study included 133 ischaemic diabetic feet. The foot transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO₂ ) and toe pressure were measured before the procedure and every second postoperative week for 6 weeks. The patients were divided into three groups according to ischaemic severity on the basis of TcPO₂ and toe pressures. In the "severely ischaemic" group, the TcPO₂ increased from 7.5 ± 4.9 to 40.3 ± 11.3 mm Hg (5.4-fold) 6 weeks after the PTA (P < 0.001). The toe pressure increased from 8.5 ± 8.8 to 42.2 ± 19.3 mm Hg (5.0-fold, P < 0.001). In the "mild" group, the TcPO₂ increased from 35.4 ± 2.5 to 41.8 ± 12.4 mm Hg (1.2-fold, P = 0.003), and the toe pressure increased from 45.7 ± 12.3 to 54.3 ± 31.3 mm Hg (1.2-fold, P > 0.05). Results of the "intermediate" group were in between. The most severely ischaemic group had the most dramatic increase of tissue perfusion after PTA. As such, PTA can be an effective method for increasing tissue perfusion even in the severely ischaemic diabetic feet.

Viabahn stent graft compared with prosthetic surgical above-knee bypass in treatment of superficial femoral artery disease: Long-term results of a retrospective analysis

The prosthetic surgical above-knee bypass (pAKB) is a standard therapy in superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease in absence of suitable vein. Viabahn graft has been established as a promising alternative. Since limited comparative data are available, we conducted a retrospective study to compare long-term outcomes of these 2 therapies in a real-world setting.Records of 52 patients (60 limbs), who were treated by pAKB (29 limbs) or Viabahn (31 limbs) were reviewed. Patients were followed up by clinical assessment, physical examination, and resting ankle brachial index (ABI) after 3, 6, 12 months and yearly thereafter. Long-term data were available for 97% in the Viabahn and 93% for pAKB after 73 ± 3.7 months (mean ± standard error [SE]).Long-term primary and secondary patencies in Viabahn group were 40% and 70%, respectively, after 63 ± 2.8 months (mean ± SE). Total lesion length was 19 ± 11.06 cm (mean ± SE), graft size was 6 ± 0.72 mm (mean ± SE). Hospital stay was 4.8 ± 0.72 days (mean ± SE). Limb salvage was achieved in 90%. Patients in the pAKB group showed a total lesion length of 24.39 ± 1.97 cm (mean ± SE), graft size was 7 ± 0.99 mm (mean ± SE). Long-term analysis after 83 ± 6.8 months (mean ± SE) revealed a primary patency of 78% with a secondary patency of 94%. Hospital stay was 10.4 ± 1.27 days (mean ± SE). Limb salvage was ensured in 97%. Long-term primary patency was lower for Viabahn (P = .044), secondary patency (P = .245), and leg salvage (P = .389) were not significantly different. However, hospital stay was shorter (P = .0002) for Viabahn.Long-term analysis of Viabahn revealed a significantly lower primary patency, a similar secondary patency, limb salvage, and significantly shorter hospital stay when compared with pAKB. Our data suggest that pAKB is still a valuable option in patients suitable for an open operation. However, Viabahn can be used as a less invasive treatment in high risk patients.

The use of crossing catheters in the recanalization of below-the-knee chronic total occlusions in patients with critical limb ischemia

Background

This study investigates the procedural success of the use of a hydrophilic crossing catheter in the recanalization of below-the-knee artery chronic total occlusions in patients with critical limb ischemia.

Methods

We retrospectively identified below-the knee chronic total occlusion interventions in 30 patients performed between March 2013 and July 2017 in our institute. The inclusion criteria were critical limb ischemia (Rutherford Class 4 or greater) and occlusion of at least one tibial vessel with revascularization performed with the use of a crossing catheter. Primary technical success was defined as placement of a guide wire in the true lumen, past the distal chronic total occlusions cap.

Results

Thirty patients underwent 34 procedures, in which 41 lesions were treated with the use of crossing catheters. Nineteen anterior tibial arteries, 18 posterior tibial arteries, and four peroneal arteries were treated. Mean length was 110.2±36 mm and 20 lesions (48.8%) were severely calcified. The primary technical success rate was 80.5%. Recanalization was achieved with a guide wire and crossing catheter in 25 lesions (76%) and with the crossing catheter alone in eight cases (24%).

Conclusion

The use of a crossing catheter showed a high rate of technical and procedural success in infrapopliteal chronic total occlusions without significant complications.

Integrated application of antegrade and retrograde recanalization for femoral-popliteal artery chronic total occlusions: outcomes compared with antegrade recanalization

Background

To investigate the efficacy of retrograde recanalization for chronic total occlusion (CTO) of femoral-popliteal artery in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, all patients who had undergone endovascular recanalization for femoral-popliteal CTOs at our center from June 2011 to October 2014 were included. Patients' demographics, immediate and follow-up outcomes were analyzed.

Results

A total of 205 patients with 238 CTOs were enrolled. In total, successful recanalization was achieved in 228 CTOs (95.8%). The antegrade procedure was successful in 196 CTOs. The retrograde procedure was successfully performed in 32 CTOs after failed antegrade procedure. Ankle-brachial index increased from 0.48±0.18 to 0.79±0.16 in antegrade group vs. 0.41±0.13 to 0.76±0.13 in retrograde group (P=0.438). Pulse score increased from 0.48±0.50 to 2.30±0.76 in antegrade group vs. 0.48±0.51 to 2.30±0.79 in retrograde group (P=0.771). At 12 and 24 months, primary patency rate was 86.2% (169/196) and 51.5% (101/196) in the antegrade group, and 75.0% (24/32) and 43.8% (14/32) in the retrograde group, respectively (P=0.346). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed limb salvage rates of 85.7% in the antegrade group vs. 78.1% in the retrograde group (P=0.198).

Conclusions

Retrograde recanalization is effective for CTO of femoral-popliteal artery after the failure of an antegrade procedure; immediate outcomes and mid-term patency and limb salvage rate are comparable with that of antegrade procedure.

Below-the-Knee Retrograde Access for Peripheral Interventions: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To investigate the hypothesis that interventions involving retrograde below-the-knee (BTK) vessel punctures have an acceptably low complication rate and high procedural success.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed of the MEDLINE and Scopus databases for articles describing the results of BTK retrograde access for peripheral interventions. Outcome measures were access success, procedure success, and complications. A predefined subgroup analysis was performed of prospective studies to reduce the influence of possible reporting bias on outcomes.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles, including 3 prospective studies, were selected, including a total of 1905 interventions in 1395 patients (mean age 69.5 years; 918 men). The BTK vessels were punctured in 1168 (61.3%) of these interventions. Access was successful in 94.0% of BTK attempts, 86.0% of all lesions were successfully crossed using a retrograde access, and 84.0% of interventions achieved technical success. Forty-eight (4.1%) distal access site complications were reported. Vessel perforations were seen in 13 (1.1%) interventions, vasospasm in 5 (0.4%), and acute distal occlusions in 5 (0.4%). Predefined subgroup analysis of prospective studies showed similar results (p=0.24).

CONCLUSION

A retrograde approach to facilitate peripheral endovascular interventions is a safe and successful technique and should be considered when an antegrade approach is not possible or fails to cross the lesion. Because of missing data on long-term outcomes and methodological shortcomings, real world data of retrograde access in nonexpert centers remains necessary before this technique can be advised to all interventionists dealing with peripheral artery disease.

Long-term outcomes after re-entry device use for recanalization of common iliac artery chronic total occlusions

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of re-entry device (RED) use on 1- and 5-year outcomes after endovascular treatment of common iliac artery (CIA) chronic total Occlusions (CTOs).

BACKGROUND

There are not enough data regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of RED.

METHODS

We performed a two-center retrospective study of 115 patients (140 lesions) undergoing CIA CTO endovascular intervention between 2006 and 2016. Baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes were described. A Cox proportional hazard model was developed to determine if REDs were associated with target lesion revascularization (TLR) or major adverse limb events (MALE) after 1 and 5 years.

RESULTS

Among 140 lesions, 43 (31%) required use of a RED. The mean age was 63.9 years and the majority (n = 80) of patients were male. An antegrade crossing approach and treatment of restenotic lesions were less common in the RED group (10% vs. 29%, P < .05 and 0% vs. 21%, P < .05, respectively). There were no significant differences in Rutherford class, pre-procedure ABI, or patient presentation. The procedural complication rates were similar between the two groups. The 1- and 5-year TLR rates for lesions treated with re-entry device vs. standard approaches were 11% vs. 9%; P = 0.8 and 29% vs. 29%; P = 0.9 respectively. The 1 and 5-year MALE rates for lesions treated with re-entry device were 5% vs. 6%; P = 0.8 and 11% vs. 11%; P = 0.9 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis found that recanalization of CIA occlusions using a RED is safe and is associated with long-term clinical outcomes similar to that of standard crossing techniques.

When Are Endovascular and Open Bypass Treatments Preferred for Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease?

Several meta-analyses and multicenter trials have shown that chronic limb ischemia did not occur for up to 5 years in 50%–70% of patients who underwent saphenous vein grafts, with limb salvage and perioperative mortality rates of >80% and 3%, respectively. However, open surgical bypass can have limitations, including postoperative morbidity/wound complications of 10%–20% and prolonged length of hospital stay and outpatient care. Several studies have analyzed clinical outcomes for patients with critical limb ischemia treated with endovascular therapies, but they have been mainly retrospective with significant heterogeneity or were single center. Only few randomized trials have compared surgical vs. endovascular therapy. These included the Bypass vs. Angioplasty in Severe Ischemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial, with no differences found in amputation-free or overall survival rates at 1 year; however, late outcomes favored the surgical group. The Bypass or Angioplasty in Severe Intermittent Claudication (BASIC) trial concluded that the 1-year patency rates were 82% and 43% for bypass and angioplasty, respectively. The BEST Endovascular vs. Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial is currently enrolling patients. This review analyzed studies comparing open vs. endovascular therapy in patients with femoropopliteal disease. (This is a review article based on the invited lecture of the 45th Annual Meeting of Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery.)

Preoperative assessment of computerized tomography angiography to predict success for crossing long Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus D lesions using the optical coherence tomography catheter

Objectives Optical coherence tomography chronic total occlusion catheter, the Ocelot (Avinger Inc., Redwood City, CA), has been utilized to cross Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus D lesions. This study evaluated the preoperative computerized tomography angiography of chronic total occlusions in the superficial femoral artery to predict clinical success. Methods We reviewed all patients who underwent lower extremity procedures with the Ocelot catheter from June 2014 to August 2016. Patients who had a preoperative computerized tomography angiography were evaluated. Final outcomes, plaque morphology, lesion length, calcium surface area, lesion location, and patient characteristics were analyzed. Results A total of 107 patients underwent lower extremity interventions with the Ocelot catheter. Seventy patients had a preoperative computerized tomography angiography scan prior to lower extremity intervention and 77% (54) had Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus D lesions that were crossed. Mean age was 62.8 years and 68.6% were male. Mean chronic total occlusion length was 182.7 mm (170.8 mm crossed vs. 222.6 mm uncrossed, p = 0.03). Calcium distribution differed significantly ( p<.01): circumferential (14.8 vs. 12.5%); eccentric (85 vs. 62.5%); and complete calcium occlusion (0 vs. 25%) for lesions that were crossed and uncrossed, respectively. Significant differences ( p<.0001) were found when calcium occlusion was less than 50% (87 vs. 31%), 51-75% (9.3 vs. 31.2%), and 76-100% (3.7 vs. 37.5%). Total calcium length in crossed lesion was 51.6 mm, and 92.8 mm in uncrossed lesions ( p = 0.10). No significant differences were noted for patient gender, occlusion location (proximal, middle, and distal superficial femoral artery), and kidney function. Conclusion The Ocelot catheter is an effective method to cross long Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus D lesions. Superficial femoral artery lesions longer than 17 cm and focal plaque morphology, specifically a total cross-sectional area of calcium and a calcium surface area greater than 50% were most predictive of failure to cross Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus D superficial femoral artery lesions. Computerized tomography angiography is an effective tool to predict success for crossing chronic total occlusions using optical coherence tomography technology and a critical consideration for patient selection.

Comparative assessment of patient outcomes with intraluminal or subintimal crossing of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions

This study compares procedural complications and clinical outcomes between subintimal crossing versus intraluminal crossing during endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions (CTO). We identified 1335 CTO interventions in 1001 patients from the multicenter Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry from January 2005 to October 2015. Outcomes included 30-day and 12-month all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, peripheral artery stent, or vessel, thrombosis (ST), need for any target limb endovascular or surgical revascularization, target limb major amputation and procedural complications. A subintimal crossing technique was necessary in 388 lesions (27% overall in 1335 lesions; 34% ( n=351) in 1023 femoropopliteal lesions, and 12% ( n=37) in 312 infrapopliteal lesions, p<0.01) with a lower procedural ( p<0.01) and technical ( p<0.01) success than the intraluminal in both femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal interventions. There were no significant differences in procedural complications, major adverse cardiac events, or clinically driven target limb revascularization at 1 year between the two groups, except a higher residual dissection rate in the subintimal crossing group than the intraluminal group in femoropopliteal target vessels ( p = 0.04).

Use of a Re-entry Device in Left Subclavian Occlusion: Case Series

PURPOSE

To describe the use of a re-entry catheter in the endovascular treatment of left subclavian stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present three patients where initial attempts at re-vascularisation using standard techniques were unsuccessful. An OUTBACK catheter was employed to facilitate re-entry in these patients.

RESULTS

True lumen re-entry was achieved in all patients, leading to successful treatment of all stenoses. There was a lack of filling of the left vertebral artery post-angioplasty in one patient; this was not clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

The case series presented is encouraging for the use of a re-entry catheter in the treatment of subclavian occlusion. In our limited experience this has proved to be a safe technique for use in patients who fail re-vascularisation by standard methods; a larger study is required to confirm this.

Endovascular Devices and Revascularization Techniques for Limb-Threatening Ischemia in Individuals With Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a rapidly worsening global epidemic over the last thirty-five years. The increased prevalence of DM has changed the phenotypic expression of atherosclerotic limb threatening ischemia (LTI), resulting in an increase in lesions in the tibial vessels. These patients are also afflicted with peripheral neuropathy, foot deformities, and medial calcification of the vasculature. In response to the evolving phenotype of atherosclerosis, newer minimally invasive tools and techniques have been developed to improve the blood supply in LTI. Arterial access, traditionally obtained from the contralateral common femoral artery (CFA) in a retrograde fashion, is now also frequently being obtained in the ipsilateral limb in an antegrade fashion. Retrograde access of the tibial, pedal, tarsal, or calf collateral vessels is also being utilized to provide a route through which wires, catheters, balloons and stents may be placed. Wires have evolved to have a variety of diameters, materials and coatings providing interventionalists with a wide variety of choices when attempting to traverse blockages in the arteries. When catheters and wires fail to traverse the lesion, newer chronic total occlusion (CTO) devices have been developed to aid in the placement of a wire across the offending lesions. Due to medial calcification associated with DM, atherectomy devices have been developed to debulk the atherosclerotic plaque within the vessel. High pressure balloon angioplasty with or without stents remain the mainstay of intervention, with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) now being frequently used to prevent reocclusions of atherosclerotic lesions.

Transvenous Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Endovascular Treatment for Chronic Total Occlusion of the Infrainguinal Arteries

PURPOSE

To investigate the 1-year outcomes of transvenous intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided endovascular therapy (EVT) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the lower extremity arteries.

METHODS

Transvenous IVUS-guided EVT was performed in 44 patients (50 limbs) with CTO of the femoropopliteal arteries or tibioperoneal trunk. Treatment involved crossing a guidewire through the CTO under the guidance of both fluoroscopic and IVUS imaging, along with insertion of the IVUS catheter into a vein parallel to the target artery. Primary success rate, complications, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12-month follow-up were investigated.

RESULTS

Successful recanalization, defined as grade 3 flow (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction score) and no flow-limiting dissection, was observed in 48 (96%) limbs. Two limbs with failed recanalization had a very long CTO lesion from the superficial femoral artery to below the knee. A bidirectional approach was selected in 11 (22%) limbs. Complications at the access site occurred in only 2 patients. The rate of freedom from TLR at 12 months was 77.9% (95% confidence interval 61.4 to 87.9).

CONCLUSION

Transvenous IVUS-guided EVT is safe and can provide optimal short-term results for EVT of CTO in the infrainguinal arteries. IVUS-guided EVT may be one of the most effective treatment strategies for CTO of the femoropopliteal arteries or tibioperoneal trunk.

The Aortic Bifurcation Angle as a Factor in Application of the Outback for Femoropopliteal Lesions in Ipsilateral Versus Contralateral Approaches

PURPOSE

To assess the technical success of the Outback reentry device in contralateral versus ipsilateral approaches for femoropopliteal arterial occlusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients treated for critical limb ischemia (CLI) using the Outback between January 2013 and July 2016 was performed. Age, gender, length and site of the occlusion, approach site, aortic bifurcation angle, and reentry site were recorded. Calcification score was assigned at both aortic bifurcation and reentry site. Technical success was assessed.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 1300 endovascular procedures were performed on 489 patients for CLI. The Outback was applied on 50 femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions. Thirty-nine contralateral and 11 ipsilateral antegrade femoral were accessed. The device was used successfully in 41 patients (82%). There were nine failures, all in the contralateral approach group. Six due to inability to deliver the device due to acute aortic bifurcation angle and three due to failure to achieve luminal reentry. Procedural success was significantly affected by the aortic bifurcation angle (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The Outback has high technical success rates in treatment of femoropopliteal occlusion, when applied from either an ipsi- or contralateral approach. When applied in contralateral access, acute aortic bifurcation angle predicts procedural failure.

A single-center retrospective analysis of patency rates of intraluminal versus subintimal endovascular revascularization of long femoropopliteal occlusions

OBJECTIVE

The evaluation of patency rates of intraluminal versus subintimal endovascular revascularization of long femoropopliteal (FP) lesions.

BACKGROUND

Chronic total occlusions (CTO) of the FP artery in peripheral interventions are crossed either with a support catheter-guidewire based technique or subintimal dissection and re-entry device assisted approach. Both techniques have a high procedural success rate, but their long term patency is not well studied. There is also lack of comparative data addressing the patency of long non-CTO vs. CTO occlusions.

METHODS

We performed a single center retrospective analysis, studying the patency rates in 215 patients (254 limbs) with TASC C and D FP lesions treated with stents. There were 3 patient groups: without CTO (non-CTO); CTO crossed using support catheter and guide-wire (CTO-SW) and CTO crossed with a re-entry device (CTO-RE).

RESULTS

There were 155 limbs in CTO-SW group; 50 in CTO-RE group and 49 in non-CTO. Lesion length (mean±SD) was 251.81±7.48mm in CTO-SW group; 280±13.18mm in CTO-RE group and 248.77±13.31 in non-CTO group (p=non-significant). In-stent restenosis (ISR) at a mean follow-up of 19.26±16.14months did not differ between groups occurring in 23 (47%) limbs in non-CTO; 66 (42%) in CTO-SW; and 24 (48%) in CTO-RE. Smoking and stent fracture were predictors of ISR by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In patients with long FP lesions, ISR rates were similar between patients with and without CTO. In the CTO group mid-term vessel patency was not affected by the crossing technique utilized.

[Subintimal recanalization. Indications, technique and results]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

This article gives an overview of the current importance of so-called subintimal recanalization in the lower extremities.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

The primary technical goal of endovascular interventions in the lower extremities is the endoluminal restoration of blood circulation from the iliac arteries into the feet.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

If endoluminal recanalization of e.g. high-grade flow-relevant stenoses or chronic total occlusion (CTO) is technically not possible, subintimal recanalization is a promising option and the only remaining minimally invasive alternative. During subintimal recanalization a channel is intentionally generated in the vessel wall (dissection) in order to bypass e. g. a chronic vascular occlusion over as short a distance as possible.

PERFORMANCE

The technical success rate for subintimal recanalization of CTO of the lower extremities is 65-100 %. Technical failure occurs in approximately 25 % using the catheter and wire technique and is caused in most cases by difficulties in reaching the true lumen after the subintimal passage (the so-called re-entry).

ACHIEVEMENTS

Compared to conventional subintimal recanalization, in recent years so-called re-entry devices have expanded the technical possibilities and depending on the medical experience and training level of the physician, provide an improvement in the technical success rate, a lower complication rate, a reduction of fluoroscopy time and the amount of necessary contrast medium but also result in higher costs.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Subintimal recanalization, whether carried out conventionally with a catheter and wire or using re-entry devices, of high-grade stenoses or CTO in the lower extremities provides a high technical success rate but requires an experienced and trained physician who is capable of operating the elaborate materials and mastering any possible complications.

Subintimal angioplasty for lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions

BACKGROUND

In recent years subintimal angioplasty (SIA) has become an established percutaneous procedure for the treatment of symptomatic lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions. However, the clinical benefits of this practice remain unclear. The aim of the review was to determine the effectiveness of SIA on clinical outcomes. This is an update of a review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of SIA versus other treatment for people with lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions, determined by the effects on clinical improvement, technical success rate, patency rate, limb salvage rate, and morbidity rates.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register (last searched January 2016) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2015, Issue 12). We also searched clinical trials registries.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included data from randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of SIA and any other management method in the treatment of lower limb arterial chronic total occlusions. The primary intervention of interest was SIA, with or without a stent, for the restoration of vessel patency in people with occlusions of a lower limb artery. We compared SIA against alternative modalities used to restore vessel patency, including conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, surgical bypass, or any other treatments. We compared different SIA devices and techniques against each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed trials for eligibility and methodological quality, and extracted data. The third review author resolved disagreements.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies, involving a total of 147 participants with TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC)-II D femoropopliteal lesions, met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Both studies were small but otherwise of high methodological quality. However, the treatment techniques and control groups of the two studies differed, precluding the combining of study results and resulting in the evidence being less applicable. We therefore considered the quality of the evidence to be low.In one study, participants with TASC-II D lesions were randomized to receive either SIA with stenting of the superficial femoral artery or remote endarterectomy (RE) with stenting of the superficial femoral artery. Three-year follow-up results showed a Rutherford classification improvement of 64% in the SIA group compared to 80% in the RE group (risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 1.03; 95 participants; P = 0.079). Postexercise ankle brachial index improvements (defined as an increased value of 0.2) were reported in 70% of participants in the SIA group compared to 82% in the RE group (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08; 95 participants; P = 0.18). The study reported the technical success rate was 93% for the SIA group and 96% for the RE group (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.07; 95 participants; P = 0.91). Primary patency at 12 months was 59.1% in the SIA group compared to 78.4% in the RE group (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.00; 95 participants; P = 0.05). Primary patency at 24 months was 56.8% in the SIA group compared to 76.5% in the RE group (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.00; 95 participants; P = 0.05) and 47.7% in the SIA group and 62.7% in the RE group at 36 months (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.11; 95 participants; P = 0.15). Assisted primary patency was 52.3% in the SIA group compared to 70.6% in the RE group (P = 0.01) at 36 months. Secondary patency was better for the RE group (P = 0.03) at 36 months. Limb salvage at three years' follow-up was 95% in the SIA group and 98% in the RE group (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.05; 95 participants; P = 0.4). There were no perioperative deaths, but complications occurred in two SIA participants (femoral pseudoaneurysm and pulmonary edema) and in three RE participants (seroma, femoral pseudoaneurysm, superficial femoral artery acute occlusion).In the second study, the effects of the SIA OUTBACK re-entry catheter device in people affected by TASC-II D superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusion were compared with the SIA manual re-entry technique. This study did not report clinical improvement and limb salvage. Technical success was achieved in all cases in both the OUTBACK device and manual groups. The primary 6-month patency rate was 100% in the OUTBACK group (26 of 26 participants) compared to 96.2% in the manual group (25 of 26 participants) (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.15). The primary 12-month patency rate was 92.3% in the OUTBACK group (24 of 26 participants) compared to 84.6% in the manual group (22 of 26 participants) (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.33). Patency rates at 24 and 36 months were not reported. The study reported that there were no complications.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Using the GRADE approach, we classified the quality of the evidence presented by both studies in this review as low due to small study size and the small number of studies. In addition, the two included trials differed from each other in the techniques and control used, and we were therefore unable to combine the data. Consequently there is currently insufficient evidence to support SIA over other techniques. Evidence from more randomized controlled trials is needed to assess the role of SIA in people with chronic lower limb arterial total occlusions.

Strategies to Approaching Lower Limb Occlusions

Endovascular management of chronic total occlusions (CTO) can be challenging both from decision-making and technical perspectives. Successful treatment and management of a CTO requires the operator to have an understanding of the salient imaging findings, a thorough knowledge of the various technical challenges of the procedure, and comprehension of the importance and necessity of long-term clinical management. This article outlines a general approach to endovascular management of lower limb CTOs and discusses indications, techniques, potential complications, and therapeutic options of the procedure.

Endovascular placement of an extraluminal arterial bypass graft - in vitro feasibility study

PURPOSE

A novel approach for arterial bypass grafting using exclusively endovascular techniques was established in-vitro in a phantom model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The experimental setting consisted of a gel-wax phantom with two embedded parallel fluid-filled silicon tubes simulating the superficial femoral vessels. Through an 8-French sheath, a re-entry catheter (OUTBACK^®, Cordis) was placed in the simulated artery and used to puncture the vascular wall. Then a 0.014-inch guide wire was advanced into the extravascular space. With the curved needle of the re-entry catheter, the guide wire was steered on a course parallel to the vessel wall in the extravascular space for 5-10 cm. At the desired reentry site, the re-entry catheter was used to puncture the vascular wall again in order to regain access to the endovascular space. Once the tip of the guide wire had safely been placed in the vascular lumen, a self-expandable stent graft (VIABAHN^® GORE^®) was deployed to complete the extraluminal bypass.

RESULTS

Endovascular placement of an extraluminal bypass was successfully achieved in 20 attempts. The mean duration of the procedure amounted to 14:58 (minutes: seconds) (SD ± 3:56).

CONCLUSIONS

This in-vitro study suggests that endovascular placement of an extraluminal arterial bypass graft is technically feasible.

Crossing chronic total occlusions with the Ocelot system: the initial European experience

AIMS

The aim of the study was to determine the safety, efficacy and feasibility of a new chronic total occlusion (CTO) device using optical coherence tomography (OCT) technology, the Ocelot catheter (Avinger, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA), for crossing of SFA CTOs following guidewire failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Prospective, multicentre, market preference testing. Thirty-three patients with confirmed CTO (99-100% stenosis by visual estimate) of their superficial femoral artery (SFA) were treated between September 28, 2011, and December 9, 2011, at three European centres. Ocelot crossed 94% (31/33) of CTOs, allowing guidewire placement in the distal true lumen. All (100%) lesions were treated without any major adverse safety events. Procedural time and contrast dose were significantly reduced (p<0.0001) when compared with a similar, non-OCT-guided CTO crossing device (Wildcat catheter; Avinger, Inc.). Overall physician feedback on the catheter performance was positive with an 87% average rating of excellent or good across seven categories. Performance ratings of Ocelot's OCT imaging guidance were consistently positive with an 86% average rating of excellent or good across five OCT categories.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ocelot catheter combines advanced CTO crossing technology with real-time OCT guidance. When compared with a similar non-OCT-guided catheter, crossing efficacy and safety profile improved. Total procedure time and contrast volumes were significantly reduced. The Ocelot is a safe, efficient and effective tool for crossing CTOs.