Palliative portal vein stent placement in malignant and symptomatic extrinsic portal vein stenosis or occlusion

Safety and effectiveness of transsplenic access for portal venous interventions: a single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous transsplenic access (PTSA) for portal vein (PV) interventions among patients with PV disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with PV disease were enrolled if they required percutaneous catheterization for PV angioplasty, embolization, thrombectomy, variceal embolization, or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement for a difficult TIPS or recanalization of a chronically occluded PV. The procedures were performed between January 2018 and January 2023. Patients were excluded if they had an active infection, had a chronically occluded splenic vein malignant infiltration of the needle tract, had undergone splenectomy, or were under age 18 years.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (15 women, 15 men) were enrolled. Catheterization of the PV through PTSA succeeded for 29 of 30 patients (96.7%). The main adverse effect recorded was flank pain in 5 of 30 cases (16.7%). No bleeding events from the spleen, splenic vein, or percutaneous access point were recorded. Two cases (6.7%) each of hepatic bleeding and rethrombosis of the PV were reported, and a change in hemoglobin levels (mean [SD], - 0.5 [1.4] g/dL) was documented in 14 cases (46.7%).

CONCLUSION

PTSA as an approach to accessing the PV is secure and achievable, with minimal risk of complications. Minimal to no bleeding is possible by using tract closure methods.

Portal vein stenting in recurrent or locally advanced peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recurrent or locally advanced peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) usually involves the portal vein (PV) leading to significant stenosis. With disease progression, clinical symptoms such as ascites, bleeding, and hepatic insufficiency are usually observed. Little is know about the benefit of PV stenting in relieving the symptoms associated to portal hypertension and allowing anticancer therapies. The aim of this study is to review our experience in PV stenting for PHCC patients.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2022, data from PHCC patients underwent PV stenting at Verona University Hospital, Italy, were reviewed. The indications were: gastrointestinal bleeding from esophagus-gastric varices, ascites not responsive to medical therapy, severe thrombocytopenia, liver insufficiency (hepatic jaundice, coagulopathy, and/or hyperammoniemia), or asymptomatic high-grade PV stenosis. Cavernous transformation and intrahepatic thrombosis in both sides of the liver were considered contraindication. Systematic anticoagulation therapy was not administered.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all 16 (100 %) patients. The improvement of clinical symptoms were observed in 12 (75 %) patients. Anticancer therapy was administrated in 11 (69 %) patients. 2 (13 %) complications were observed: 1 biliary injury and 1 recurrent cholangitis that required a percutaneous trans-hepatic biliary drainage placement. Stent occlusion for tumor progression occurred in 1 patient and a re-stenting procedure was successfully performed. No case of thrombotic stent occlusion was observed during follow up. The 1-year stent patency was 86 % and the median patency period was 8 months (IQR, 4-12).

CONCLUSION

PV stenting is a feasible and safe palliative treatment that improves clinical condition, allow anticancer therapies, and provide a better quality of life.

Extrahepatic portomesenteric obstruction resulting in splanchnic hypertension and refractory ascites

Portal hypertension is a commonly described etiology that typically stems from underlying cirrhosis. Interventional radiologists may offer several interventions in the multidisciplinary approach to managing these patients. However, it is important to ascertain the cause and type of hypertension before intervention to avoid poor outcomes. We describe a case of an 89-year-old male with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and isolated superior mesenteric venous hypertension secondary to external stent compression at the portomesenteric confluence. This resulted in refractory ascites which was significantly relieved after portal to superior mesenteric vein stent placement.

Transsplenic Portal System Catheterization: Review of Current Indications and Techniques

Multiple diseases of the portal system require effective portal vein access for endovascular management. While percutaneous transhepatic and transjugular approaches remain the standard methods of portal vein access, transsplenic access (TSA) has gained recognition as an effective and safe technique to access the portal system in patients with contraindications to traditional approaches. Recently, the utility of percutaneous TSA has grown, with described treatments including recanalization of chronic portal vein occlusion, placement of stents for portal vein stenosis, portal vein embolization of the liver, embolization of gastric varices, placement of complicated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, and interventions after liver transplant. The authors provide a review of percutaneous TSA, including indications, a summary of related portal vein diseases, and the different techniques used for access and closure. In addition, an imaging-based review of technical considerations of TSA interventions is presented, with a review of potential procedural complications. With technical success rates that mirror or rival the standard methods and reported low rates of major complications, TSA can be a safe and effective option in clinical scenarios where traditional approaches are not feasible. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Effect of Stent Placement on Survival in Patients with Malignant Portal Vein Stenosis: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Objective

Percutaneous portal vein (PV) stent placement can be an effective treatment for symptoms associated with portal hypertension. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of PV stenting on the overall survival (OS) in patients with malignant PV stenosis.

Materials and Methods

Two groups of patients with malignant PV stenosis were compared in this retrospective study involving two institutions. A total of 197 patients who underwent PV stenting between November 2016 and August 2019 were established as the stent group, whereas 29 patients with PV stenosis who were treated conservatively between July 2013 and October 2016 constituted the no-stent group. OS was compared between the two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Risk factors associated with OS were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Procedure-associated adverse events were also evaluated.

Results

The stent group finally included 100 patients (median age, 65 [interquartile range, 58–71] years; 64 male). The no-stent group included 22 patients (69 [61–75] years, 13 male). Stent placement was successful in 95% of attempted cases, and the 1- and 2-year stent occlusion–free survival rate was 56% (95% confidence interval, 45%–69%) and 44% (32%–60%), respectively. The median stent occlusion–free survival time was 176 (interquartile range, 70–440) days. OS was significantly longer in the stent group than in the no-stent group (median 294 vs. 87 days, p < 0.001 before PSM, p = 0.011 after PSM). The 1- and 3-year OS rates before PSM were 40% and 11%, respectively, in the stent group. The 1-year OS rate after PSM was 32% and 5% in the stent and no-stent groups, respectively. Anemia requiring transfusion (n = 2) and acute thrombosis necessitating re-stenting (n = 1) occurred in three patients in the stent group within 1 week.

Conclusion

Percutaneous placement of a PV stent may be effective in improving OS in patients with malignant PV stenosis.

Portal Vein Irradiation Stent Plus Chemoembolization versus External Radiotherapy Plus Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumour Thrombus: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of portal vein irradiation stent implantation (PVIS) plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiotherapy (RT) plus TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT).

METHODS

Data from 79 patients with HCC complicated by PVTT treated with PVIS implantation plus TACE (n = 53) or treated with RT plus TACE (n = 26) were retrospectively analysed. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, and the secondary outcome was the stent patency period. HCC response and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 14.3 (range, 1.2 ~ 60) months, the median OS was 13.1 (95% CI: 9.8 ~ 16.4) months in the PVIS plus TACE group compared to 8.0 (95% CI: 6.1 ~ 9.9) months in the RT plus TACE group (p = 0.021). Stent occlusion was observed in 11 patients with a median patency time of 8.5 (range, 2 ~ 22) months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that Vp4 PVTT (HR: 5.22; 95% CI: 1.74-15.74) and poor response to therapy (HR: 4.89; 95% CI: 2.66-8.99) were independent risk factors for OS, whereas PVIS plus TACE treatment (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.18-0.56) was related to better prognosis. None of the patients in the two groups had grade 3-4 complications.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this retrospective study shows that PVIS plus TACE provides a significantly better survival outcome than RT plus TACE for HCC patients with PVTT.

Therapeutic effect of portal vein stenting for portal vein stenosis after upper-abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic effect of portal vein (PV) stenting for PV stenosis following nontransplant hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery has not been fully investigated.

METHODS

Changes in portal venous pressure (PVP) gradient before and after stenting, complications, symptomatic improvement, and stent patency were evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 14 consecutive patients undergoing PV stenting for malignant (n = 8) and benign (n = 6) PV stenosis. Signs of PV stenosis were composed of refractory ascites in 6 patients, varices with hemorrhagic tendencies in 5, and abnormal liver function in 5. The median PVP gradient after PV stenting was 3.0 cm H₂O (range, 1.5-3.0), which was significantly smaller than that before PV stenting (median, 15 cm H₂O [range, 2.5-25]; P < 0.01). Thirteen out of 14 (93%) achieved clinical success with symptomatic improvement, except one patient with sustained refractory ascites because of peritoneal seeding. During the median follow-up time of 7.3 months (range, 1.0-87), stent occlusion occurred in two patients (14%) because of intrastent tumor growth. The 1-year cumulative stent patency rate was 76% in the entire cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on durable effect on patency, we deemed PV stenting for PV stenosis after HPB surgery to be safe and beneficial for improving symptoms.

Management problems in patients with pancreatic cancer from a surgeon's perspective

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal gastrointestinal tumor entities. Surgery is the only chance for cure; however, only a minority of patients can be offered this option. Due to the anatomic location of the gland, tumor-related problems and complications affecting the surrounding structures are common, leading to biliary and gastric outlet obstruction as well as portal vein thrombosis. This review article summarizes the management of pancreatic cancer-related problems from a surgical point of view. We further describe surgical treatment options in unresectable, metastasized and recurring pancreatic cancer, highlighting potential resection of oligometastatic disease in selected settings.

Portal Vein Stenting for Jejunal Variceal Bleeding after Recurrence of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

A 73-year-old woman with portal vein stenosis caused by tumor recurrence after pancreatoduodenectomy was treated with stent placement without embolization of the jejunal varix. Anticoagulation therapy using heparin followed by rivaroxaban was administered after the procedure. She continued to receive systemic chemotherapy as an outpatient. Neither restenosis nor stent thrombosis was observed after 7 months. Based on the presented case and literature review, portal vein stenting is an effective treatment option for jejunal variceal bleeding caused by malignant portal venous stricture after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Antithrombotic therapy following portal venous stenting is required to prevent stent thrombosis in the majority of cases, although it has a risk of inducing recurrent variceal bleeding. Adjunctive jejunal variceal embolization can possibly be omitted in selected cases to obtain sufficient portal-SMV flow reconstruction.

Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein stenting as rescue treatment for recurrent oesophageal variceal bleeding in a 31-year-old woman with haepatocellular carcinoma in a non-cirrhotic liver

A 31-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma suffered from recurrent oesophageal variceal bleeding due to portal hypertension, which was caused by severe compression of the portal vein by metastatic lymph nodes. Endoscopic band ligation and pharmacological treatment did not suffice to prevent recurrence of variceal bleeding. Eventually, after the fifth variceal bleeding within 6 months, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit in a haemodynamic shock. A Sengstaken-Blakemore tube was inserted and all treatment options were discussed, but only percutaneous transhepatic recanalisation of the portal vein with stent placement to reduce portal vein pressure was thought to be feasible with any chance to relieve portal vein pressure. After successful portal vein stenting, our patient did not have any recurrent bleeding in the remaining year of her life. We suggest that percutaneous transhepatic portal vein stenting may be a feasible and adequate last line treatment for complications of portal hypertension.

Portal vein stent placement after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic stent placement for portal vein (PV) stenosis after liver transplantation (LT) and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery.

Methods

Retrospective study of 455 patients who underwent LT and 522 patients who underwent resection of the pancreatic head between June 2011 and February 2016. Technical success, clinical success, patency, and complications were evaluated for both groups.

Results

A total of 23 patients were confirmed to have postoperative PV stenosis and were treated with percutaneous transhepatic PV stent placement. The technical success rate was 100%, the clinical success rate was 80%, and the long-term stent patency was 91.3% for the entire study population. Two procedure-related hemorrhages and two early stent thromboses occurred in the HPB group while no complications occurred in the LT group. A literature review of selected studies reporting PV stent placement for the treatment of PV stenosis after HPB surgery and LT showed a technical success rate of 78–100%, a clinical success rate of 72–100%, and a long-term patency of 57–100%, whereas the procedure-related complication rate varied from 0–33.3%.

Conclusions

Percutaneous transhepatic PV stent is a safe and effective treatment for postoperative PV stenosis/occlusion in patients undergoing LT regardless of symptoms. Due to increased risk of complications, the indication for percutaneous PV stent placement after HPB surgery should be limited to patients with clinical symptoms after an individual assessment.

Right trisectionectomy with en bloc portal vein resection for cholangiocarcinoma after preoperative stenting for main portal vein occlusion

Deprivation of portal blood flow decreases the hepatic function, thus hepatobiliary cancer patients with total occlusion of the main portal vein (PV) are usually not indicated for major hepatectomy. We herein present a 37-year-old male patient with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, in whom right trisectionectomy was indicated. However, the main PV was nearly completely occluded by tumor invasion, thus resolution of jaundice was markedly slow. To restore the liver function through PV recanalization, a wall stent was inserted percutaneously. Jaundice resolved progressively after PV stenting. Right trisectionectomy, caudate lobectomy, bile duct resection, and en bloc PV segmental resection with iliac vein homograft interposition were performed. However, PV thrombosis developed at the site of PV stent removal, thus a new wall stent was inserted during the operation. The pathology report presented that the tumor was a 5.2 cm-sized well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of periductal infiltrating type with lymph node metastasis. During the follow-up, the interposed PV segment with a wall stent was gradually occluded with development of portal collaterals. At 5 years after surgery, the PV stent was completely occluded and collaterals developed. The patient experienced repetition of febrile episodes of unknown causes. He is currently alive for 8 years with no evidence of tumor recurrence. The detailed surgical procedures were presented with a supplementary video clip of 5 minutes.

A Case of Portal Venous Stenting for Metastatic Hilar Stricture After the Radical Resection of Colon Cancer

Like standard stenting in an unresectable malignant stricture of the biliary or digestive tract, minimally invasive modality for portal stenosis is indispensable for palliation. We describe here a safe and practical procedure of portal stenting in a case of metastatic hilar strictures developed nine years after the radical resection of sigmoid colon cancer. After urgent delivery of the biliary tract stenting for the relief of jaundice, the patient received palliative stenting for the stricture of the portal trunk. Transhepatic approach, via the anterior branch, of the portal vein intervention may fit into the standard aspects for portal stenting.

Successful Treatment of a Case of Ectopic Jejunal Varices with Portal Venous Stenting

Patient: Female, 77

Final Diagnosis: Ectopic variceal bleeding of the jejunum

Symptoms: Abdominal pain • hematemesis • melena

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Portal vein stenting

Specialty: Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Medical oncology and pancreatic cancer: what the radiologist needs to know

The majority of PCs present as advanced disease, and treatment goals are for prolongation of life and palliation of the symptoms. Oncologists rely on our radiology colleagues to provide information on the extent of disease and the effectiveness of our treatment. The stakes rise in those patients where the disease has seemingly not spread and who might be treated with a goal of cure. For this subset of patients, medical oncologists and surgeons require as precise a radiologic description as possible in order to most accurately characterize the extent of the disease, in turn informing us as to the likelihood of a successful surgery and potential cure. In this paper, we review the fine points of imaging that distinguish resectable from borderline or unresectable patients, explain the principles of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer, highlight some of the novel therapies now being pioneered in pancreatic cancer, and review radiologic features important for palliative care in patients with these tumors.

Portomesenteric Venous Stenting for Palliation of Ascites and Variceal Bleeding Caused by Prehepatic Portal Hypertension

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate percutaneous transhepatic portal vein stenting (PVS) for palliation of refractory ascites and/or variceal bleeding caused by extrahepatic portomesenteric venous stenosis in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective review of patients who underwent PVS between January 2007 and July 2015 was performed. A total of 38 patients were identified, of whom 28 met the inclusion criterion of PVS performed primarily for refractory ascites or variceal bleeding. In addition to technical success and overall survival, clinical success was measured by fraction of remaining life palliated. The palliative effect of PVS was also quantified by measuring changes in liver and ascites volumes after the procedure.

RESULTS

Technical success was 93% (26/28). Stent deployment involved more than one portomesenteric vessel in most patients (20/26). The cumulative probability of symptom recurrence at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 12%, 16%, 26%, and 40%, respectively. There was a significant difference (p < .001) in the probability of symptom recurrence, recurrence of abdominal ascites, and increase in liver volume between patients whose stents remained patent and those whose stents demonstrated partial or complete occlusion. The mean fraction of remaining life palliated was 87%. All but two patients were found to have improvement in clinical symptoms for the majority of their lives after the procedure. There were no major or minor complications.

CONCLUSION

As a low-risk procedure with a high clinical success rate, PVS can play a substantial role in improving quality of life in patients with portomesenteric stenoses.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Portomesenteric venous stenosis is a challenging complication of pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Portomesenteric stenoses can lead to esophageal, gastric, and mesenteric variceal bleeding, as well as abdominal ascites. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of portal vein stenting (PVS) in patients with cancer who have symptomatic portal hypertension caused by portomesenteric venous compression. As a low-risk procedure with a high clinical success rate, PVS can play a substantial role in improving quality of life in patients with portomesenteric stenoses.

Portal vein stent placement for the treatment of postoperative portal vein stenosis: long-term success and factor associated with stent failure

Background

Portal vein stenosis develops due to different causes including postoperative inflammation and oncological processes. However, limited effective therapy is available for portal vein stenosis. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of a portal vein stent for portal vein stenosis after hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery and to determine the factors associated with stent patency.

Methods

From December 2003 to December 2015, portal vein stents were implanted in 29 patients who had portal vein stenosis after hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of portal vein stent placement. Twelve clinical variables were analyzed for their role in stent patency.

Results

The symptoms before portal vein stent placements included nine patients with hepatic encephalopathy, six patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, four patients with ascites, and four patients with hyperbilirubinemia. Portal vein thrombosis due to postoperative portal stenosis was found in four patients. Portal vein stent were successfully implanted without any major complications. Of the 21 patients with symptoms, 17 showed improvement, and stent patency was maintained in 22 (76%) patients. The presence of a collateral vein is the only variable related to the development of an occlusion after portal stenting.

Conclusion

Portal vein stent were implanted safely and had good long-term patency. This procedure is useful to relieve portal hypertension-related symptoms and to improve the quality of life. Our data strongly suggest that embolization to block blood flow in a collateral vein during portal vein stent placement will improve the patency of the stent.

Therapeutic efficacy and stent patency of transhepatic portal vein stenting after surgery

AIM

To evaluate portal vein (PV) stenosis and stent patency after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, using abdominal computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Percutaneous portal venous stenting was attempted in 22 patients with significant PV stenosis (> 50%) - after hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery - diagnosed by abdominal CT. Stents were placed in various stenotic lesions after percutaneous transhepatic portography. Pressure gradient across the stenotic segment was measured in 14 patients. Stents were placed when the pressure gradient across the stenotic segment was > 5 mmHg or PV stenosis was > 50%, as observed on transhepatic portography. Patients underwent follow-up abdominal CT and technical and clinical success, complications, and stent patency were evaluated.

RESULTS

Stent placement was successful in 21 patients (technical success rate: 95.5%). Stents were positioned through the main PV and superior mesenteric vein (n = 13), main PV (n = 2), right and main PV (n = 1), left and main PV (n = 4), or main PV and splenic vein (n = 1). Patients showed no complications after stent placement. The time between procedure and final follow-up CT was 41-761 d (mean: 374.5 d). Twenty stents remained patent during the entire follow-up. Stent obstruction - caused by invasion of the PV stent by a recurrent tumor - was observed in 1 patient in a follow-up CT performed after 155 d after the procedure. The cumulative stent patency rate was 95.7%. Small in-stent low-density areas were found in 11 (55%) patients; however, during successive follow-up CT, the extent of these areas had decreased.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous transhepatic stent placement can be safe and effective in cases of PV stenosis after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Stents show excellent patency in follow-up abdominal CT, despite development of small in-stent low-density areas.

Portal Vein Stent Placement in Five Patients with Chronic Portal Vein Thrombosis Prior to Pancreatic Surgery

Five patients with pancreatic tumors and chronic portal vein (PV) thrombosis underwent PV stent placement before surgery. The patients either had resectable tumors or locally advanced tumors with stable, partial, or complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. PV stent placement removed periportal collaterals in all cases, with no complications, in a mean time of 150 minutes. Patients received a daily dose of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin until 12 hours before surgery, and low-molecular-weight heparin was resumed for 30 days after surgery. Surgery was performed 1 day to 3 months after PV stent placement, with no complications related to periportal collaterals.

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided placement of a transhepatic portal vein stent in a live porcine model

Background and Objectives:

Percutaneous portal vein (PV) stent placement is used to manage PV occlusion or stenosis caused by malignancy. The use of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has expanded to include vascular interventions. The aim of this study was to examine the technical feasibility and safety of EUS-guided transhepatic PV stent placement in a live porcine model.

Materials and Methods:

EUS-guided transhepatic PV stent placement was performed in six male miniature pigs under general anesthesia using forward-viewing echoendoscope. Under EUS guidance, the left intrahepatic PV was punctured with a 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle and a 0.025 inch guidewire inserted through the needle and into the main PV. The FNA needle was then withdrawn and a needle-knife inserted to dilate the tract. Under EUS and fluoroscopic guidance, a noncovered metal stent was inserted over the guidewire and released into the main PV.

Results:

A PV stent was placed successfully in all six pigs with no technical problems or complications. The patency of the stent in the main PV was confirmed using color Doppler EUS and transhepatic portal venography. Necropsy of the first three animals revealed no evidence of bleeding and damage to intra-abdominal organs or vessels. No complications occurred in the remaining three animals during the 8 weeks observation period.

Conclusions:

EUS-guided transhepatic PV stent placement can be both technically feasible and safe in a live animal model.

Clinical Management of Acute Portal/Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis

Background

Acute thrombosis of the portal vein (PV) and/or the mesenteric vein (MV) is a rare but potentially life-threatening disease. A multitude of risk factors for acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT)/mesenteric vein thrombosis (MVT) have been identified, including liver cirrhosis, malignancy, coagulation disorders, intra-abdominal infection/inflammation, and postoperative condition.

Methods

This article analyses the treatment options for acute PVT/MVT.

Results

Initially, the clinical management should identify patients with an intra-abdominal focus requiring immediate surgical intervention (e.g. bowel ischaemia). Subsequently, emphasis is placed on the recanalization of the PV/MV or at least the prevention of thrombus extension to avoid long-term complications of portal hypertension. Several therapeutic options are currently available, including anticoagulation therapy, local/systemic thrombolysis, interventional or surgical thrombectomy, and a combination of these procedures. Due to the lack of prospective randomized studies, a comparison between these therapeutic approaches regarding the efficacy of PV/MV recanalization is difficult, if not impossible.

Conclusion

In patients with acute PVT/MVT, an individualized treatment based on the clinical presentation, the underlying disease, the extent of the thrombosis, and the patients' comorbidities is mandatory. Therefore, these patients should be considered for an interdisciplinary therapy in specialized centres with the option to utilise all therapeutic approaches currently available.

Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein stenting for malignant portal vein stenosis secondary to recurrent perihilar biliary cancer

BACKGROUND

Transhepatic portal vein (PV) stenting has been shown to be one of the most important treatments for patients with PV stenosis caused by hepatopancreatobiliary malignancy.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with PV stenosis caused by the recurrence of a perihilar biliary malignancy underwent transhepatic PV stenting. A self-expandable metallic stent was deployed at the stenosis site. The patients were retrospectively analyzed with regard to the procedure, complications, and survival after the stent placement.

RESULTS

The median interval between the primary resection and the PV stenting was 22 months. The initial hepatic resection was a left trisectionectomy with caudate lobectomy in seven patients, a left hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy in one patient, a right anterior sectionectomy with caudate lobectomy following a left hepatectomy in one patient and a partial liver resection in one patient. The angle of the PV around the stenosis was greater in the patients with PV stenosis located in the right posterior PV. Eight patients with successful PV stent placement were able to receive anticancer treatment, with a median survival of 14 months. The remaining two patients without successful PV stent placement survived less than 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Portal vein stenting might offer relief from the symptoms associated with PV hypertension and the opportunity for sustainable anticancer therapy in patients with recurrent perihilar biliary malignancy.

Portal vein stenting to treat portal vein stenosis in a patient with malignant tumor and gastrointestinal bleeding

This report describes the successful use of portal venous stent placement for a patient with recurrent melena secondary to jejunal varices that developed after subtotal stomach preserved pancreatoduodenectomy (SSPPD). A 67-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with tarry stool and severe anemia at 2 years after SSPPD for carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Abdominal computed tomography examination showed severe stenosis of the extrahepatic portal vein caused by local recurrence and showed an intensely enhanced jejunal wall at the choledochojejunostomy. Gastrointestinal bleeding scintigraphy also revealed active bleeding near the choledochojejunostomy. Based on these findings, jejunal varices resulting from portal vein stenosis were suspected as the cause of the melena. Portal vein stenting and balloon dilation was performed via the ileocecal vein after laparotomy. Coiling of the jejunal varices and sclerotherapy of the dilate postgastric vein with 5% ethanolamine oleate with iopamidol was performed. After portal stent placement, the patient was able to lead a normal life without gastrointestinal hemorrhage. However, he died 7 months later due to liver metastasis.

Embolization of percutaneous transhepatic portal venous access tract with N-butyl cyanoacrylate

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (N-BCA) embolization of percutaneous transhepatic portal venous access tract and to establish an appropriate technique.

METHODS

40 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous transhepatic portal venous intervention for various reasons. Embolization of percutaneous transhepatic portal venous access tract was performed after the procedure in all of the patients using N-BCA and Lipiodol® (Lipiodol Ultra Fluide; Laboratoire Guerbet, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France) mixture. Immediate ultrasonography and fluoroscopy were performed to evaluate perihepatic haematoma formation and unintended embolization of more than one segmental portal vein. Follow-up CT was performed, and haemoglobin and haematocrit levels were checked to evaluate the presence of bleeding.

RESULTS

Immediate haemostasis was achieved in all of the patients, without development of perihepatic haematoma or unintended embolization of more than one segmental portal vein. Complete embolization of percutaneous access tract was confirmed in 39 out of 40 patients by CT. Seven patients showed decreased haemoglobin and haematocrit levels. Other complications included mild pain at the site of embolization and mild fever, which resolved after conservative management. 16 patients died during the follow-up period owing to progression of the underlying disease.

CONCLUSION

Embolization of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein access tract with N-BCA is feasible and technically safe. With the appropriate technique, N-BCA can be safely used as an alternate embolic material since it is easy to use and inexpensive compared with other embolic materials.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first study to investigate the efficacy of N-BCA for percutaneous transhepatic portal venous access tract embolization.

Image-guided interventions in oncology

Interventional oncology, a term commonly used to indicate the minimally invasive procedures performed by interventional radiologists to diagnose and manage cancer, encompasses a broad spectrum of techniques unique to interventional radiology that have been established as a vital part of the multidisciplinary oncologic cancer care team. This article provides an updated overview of the variety of applications of image-guided procedures to distinct clinical scenarios, such as the diagnosis, treatment, and management of complications of malignancies.

Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein stenting in a patient with benign non-transplant postoperative portal vein stenosis: A case report

Extrahepatic portal vein stenosis is caused by a variety of benign and malignant diseases and results in development of symptoms due to portal hypertension. Benign post-surgical adhesions causing portal vein stenosis in non-transplant population is an uncommon etiology of portal hypertension. Endovascular treatment of such patients with angioplasty and stenting is uncommonly reported in literature. We report a case of portal hypertension caused by benign postoperative portal vein fibrosis, successfully treated by self-expandable metallic stent.

One-stage percutaneous triple procedure for treatment of endoscopically unmanageable patients with malignant biliary obstruction and marked ascites

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

To assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of one-stage percutaneous triple procedure including; ascites drainage, primary metallic biliary stenting, and tract embolisation with N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA), in treatment of patients with malignant biliary obstruction and marked ascites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study involved 25 patients with malignant biliary obstruction and marked ascites (age range, 46-78y; mean age±SD, 65y±5) for whom endoscopic treatment failed or was unsuitable. Ascites drainage, percutaneous primary metallic biliary stenting, and tract embolisation with lipiodol/NBCA mixture were performed in a one-stage procedure. The mean±SD follow up period was 26±2weeks.

RESULTS

The technical and clinical success rates were 96% and 88% respectively. No procedure related deaths or major complications were observed. The reported minor complications included; moderate pain and vomiting during and after balloon dilation, postprocedural cholangitis, and bile leakage in 44%, 16%, and 8% of the patients respectively. Primary stent patency was achieved in 96%. The 30-days mortality was 8%. The stent obstruction occurred in 3 (13%) of the 23 patients who survived more than 30-days.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous drainage of ascites followed immediately by primary biliary stenting, together with tract embolisation with NBCA is technically feasible, safe, and effective alternative palliative treatment for endoscopically unmanageable patients with malignant biliary obstruction and marked ascites.

Focal portal vein stenosis in an adolescent potentially related to complicated umbilical catheter insertion in the neonatal period

A 14-year-old girl, with no medical history except for a preterm birth at 7 months, presented with clinical and laboratory signs of pancytopenia. Radiological investigation, including abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a focal irregular main portal vein wall and splenomegaly. Endoscopy showed major esophageal and gastric varices. Definitive diagnosis was made by direct, transhepatic portography revealing a focal stenosis associated with a dissection of the main portal vein. Percutaneous treatment including balloon angioplasty and stent placement resulted in complete re-expansion of the portal vein main branch. Clinical and radiological follow-up over 5 years showed complete disappearance of all clinical signs and normalization of laboratory data and splenic volume.

Portal Hypertension, Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia of the Liver, and Obstructive Portal Venopathy due to Metastatic Breast Cancer

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) of the liver is associated with noncirrhotic portal hypertension, rheumatologic and hematologic disorders, administration of certain drugs, and other underlying conditions. This report describes a 64-year-old man with clinically presumed cirrhosis who presented to our institution with coffee-ground emesis, esophageal varices, ascites, and encephalopathy. Eleven years earlier he had been treated for breast cancer with mastectomy and chemo-radiotherapy. He died suddenly, and the autopsy showed no evidence of cirrhosis but instead demonstrated NRH with extensive emboli of recurrent breast carcinoma within the portal vein and its intrahepatic branches. Neoplastic occlusion of the portal vein as a cause of presinusoidal noncirrhotic portal hypertension has not previously been reported for metastatic breast carcinoma. This case highlights the importance of obstructive portal venopathy in the pathogenesis of NRH as well as the diagnostic difficulties that may be encountered in determining the cause of portal hypertension.

Portal vein stenosis after pancreatectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer

Extrahepatic portal vein (PV) stenosis has various causes, such as tumor encasement, pancreatitis and as a post-surgical complication. With regard to post-pancreaticoduodenectomy, intraoperative radiation therapy with/without PV resection is reported to be associated with PV stenosis. However, there has been no report of PV stenosis after pancreatectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT). Here we report the cases of three patients with PV stenosis after pancreatectomy and PV resection following gemcitabine-based NACRT for pancreatic cancer and their successful treatment with stent placement. We have performed NACRT in 18 patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer since 2005. Of the 15 patients who completed NACRT, nine had undergone pancreatectomy. Combined portal resection was performed in eight of the nine patients. We report here three patients with PV stenosis, and thus the ratio of post-operative PV stenosis in patients with PV resection following NACRT is 37.5% in this series. We encountered no case of PV stenosis among 22 patients operated with PV resection for pancreatobiliary cancer without NACRT during the same period. A relationship between PV stenosis and NACRT is suspected, but further investigation is required to determine whether NACRT has relevance to PV stenosis.

Clinical usefulness of portal venous stent in hepatobiliary pancreatic cancers

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with portal vein (PV) stenosis or occlusion after surgery are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PV stent placement in patients with portal vein occlusion or stenosis after radical operation for hepatobiliary pancreatic malignant tumour.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 59 patients who underwent portal venous stent placement at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, for PV stenosis or occlusion between February 2008 and February 2012.

RESULTS

Stents were placed in the portal venous system across stenotic (n = 47) and occlusive (n = 12) lesions after percutaneous transhepatic portography. Reasons for stent placement were tumour recurrence (n = 30), portal vein resection and anastomosis (n = 18) and post-operative inflammatory changes (n = 11). Pressure gradients (superior mesenteric vein, main PV) decreased immediately after stent placement, from 10.5 mm Hg ± 4.4 (standard deviation) to 2.5 mm Hg ± 2.6 (P < 0.0001). Liver function was improved post-stenting (P < 0.05). The median time between the original surgery and stent placement was 16 (1-137) days in the vascular-orientated group and 306 (13-3703) days in the tumour recurrence group (P < 0.0001). Transient fever developed in 11 patients, but resolved in 2-5 days. Stents were occluded in 15 of the 59 patients (25.4%).

CONCLUSION

PV stent placement is a safe choice, has an acceptable success rate and provides marked relief from portal hypertension due to portal vein occlusion or stenosis after hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. Liver function data are also improved after portal venous stent placement.

Safety and efficacy of primary metallic biliary stent placement with tract embolization in patients with massive ascites: a retrospective analysis of 16 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of primary metallic biliary stent placement with tract embolization in patients with massive ascites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with malignant biliary obstruction and massive ascites (age range, 44-79 y; median age, 59 y) were treated with primary percutaneous stent placement with tract embolization. These patients were unsuitable candidates for endoscopic intervention. Etiologies of biliary obstruction were gastric cancer with hilar nodal metastases (n = 9), pancreatic carcinoma (n = 5), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1), and gallbladder carcinoma (n = 1). Eight patients had nonhilar lesions and the remaining eight had hilar lesions. Percutaneous accesses to the biliary system and stent placements were performed in a one-step procedure, and catheters were removed with tract embolization with metallic coils.

RESULTS

Stent placement and tract embolization were successful in all patients, without external drainage catheters left in place. Significant reduction of serum bilirubin level was observed in 14 patients (87.5%). No bile peritonitis or intraperitoneal hemorrhage occurred. Major complications included postprocedural cholangitis (12.5%), bloody bowel discharge (6.2%), and right pleural effusion (25.0%). One patient who died 19 days after intervention was deemed to represent a procedure-related mortality. During the survival period (range, 19-175 d; median, 66 d), stent occlusion was noted in two patients at 6 and 159 days after the procedure. Primary stent patency was achieved in 14 patients (87.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary biliary stent placement with tract embolization is technically safe and offers an effective palliative treatment option for patients with malignant biliary obstruction and massive ascites when endoscopic intervention is not possible.

Endoluminal treatment for venous vascular complications of malignant tumors

The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of interventional treatment for venous vascular complications of malignant tumors. Sixty-one patients with venous vascular complications of malignant tumors were treated from May 2002 to May 2009; 37 men and 24 women with mean age 57.8 years (33-82 years). Lesions included acute deep vein thrombosis (n=18); venous stenosis or occlusion (n=32); tumor embolus in vein (n=11). The interventional therapeutic operations included vena cava filter implantation, trans-catheter thrombolytic therapy, recanalization, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting. The success rate of thrombolysis and stent implantation, the clinical success rate, complications, recurrence rate of the treated region and survival duration were recorded. Eighteen patients accepted filter and thrombolytic therapy with a success rate of 100%; total urokinase dosage was 7.42±1.49 (4.5-10) million units. Symptoms disappeared (n=15), were palliated (n=3) and thrombi were completely dissolved (n=2), almost completely dissolved (n=8, >90%), partially dissolved (n=6, 50-90%) and not dissolved (n=2, <50%). No pulmonary embolism emerged after the operation. Forty-three patients accepted recanalization, PTA and stent therapy with a success rate of 95.3% (41/43). Symptoms disappeared (n=25), were palliated (n=16) and did not change (n=2) 3 days following the operation. There were no severe complications during the procedure. During follow-up, 12 patients again suffered symptoms of venous occlusion and 47 patients died of tumor aggravation without symptom recurrence. As a result, interventional therapy has advantages including smaller injuries, well tolerance, high success rate, quick palliation of symptoms and superior clinical efficacy in the treatment of venous vascular complications for malignant tumors.

Imaging assessment of congenital and acquired abnormalities of the portal venous system

Abnormalities of the portal venous system are a heterogeneous group of conditions that can cause substantial morbidity and mortality and may lead to complications during surgery or percutaneous interventions involving the portal venous system. High-resolution computed tomography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging permit a comprehensive, noninvasive evaluation of the portal venous system, enabling the detection of both structural and functional abnormalities. However, an understanding of the embryologic development of the normal portal venous anatomy and anatomic variants is essential to accurately interpret the imaging findings. Knowledge of the characteristic appearances of abnormalities of the portal venous system allows a more confident diagnosis, permitting timely treatment and more informed guidance of surgical procedures and percutaneous interventions, which may lead to an improved outcome.