Comparing intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy versus intravesical chemotherapy alone: a randomised prospective pilot study for T1G3 bladder transitional cell carcinoma after bladder-preserving surgery

Patterns of treatment of high-risk BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients among Arab urologists

PURPOSE

To understand the treatment plans suggested for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive disease (NMIBC) patients in the Arab countries and therapeutic decisions applied for BCG-naive patients during BCG shortage time.

METHODS

A 10-minute online survey was distributed through the Arab Association of Urology (AAU) office to urologists in the Arab countries who treat patients with NMIBC.

RESULTS

One hundred six urologists responded to the survey. The majority of urologists had treated, in the past 6 months, > 10 patients with NMIBC who were considered BCG-unresponsive (55% of respondents). Radical cystectomy (RC) was the most popular treatment option (recommended by 50%) for these patients. This was followed by intravesical chemotherapy (30%), repeat BCG therapy (12%), resection with ongoing surveillance (8%). Clinical trials and intravenous checkpoint inhibitors were never selected. The most preferred intravesical chemotherapy was by ranking: 60% gemcitabine, 19% mitomycin C, 8% docetaxel, 8% gemcitabine/docetaxel, 4% sequential gemcitabine/mitomycin C, and 1% valrubicin. The use of intravesical chemotherapy appears limited by Arab urologists due to concerns regarding clinical efficacy (fear of progression) and the lack of clear recommendations by urology societies. Given the BCG shortage, which may vary per Arab country, Arab urologists have adjusted by prioritizing BCG for T1 and carcinoma in situ (CIS) patients over Ta, adapting intravesical chemotherapy, and reducing the dose/strength of BCG administered. Most physicians report an eagerness to utilize novel therapies to address the BCG deficit, especially to try intravesical chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though Arab urologists are in the majority of cases selecting RC for BCG-unresponsive cases, one-third of them are most recently initiating intravesical chemotherapy as an alternative option. To further assist Arab urologists in the appropriate selection of BCG unresponsive high risk NMIBC patient treatments, enhanced education and pathway protocols are needed.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of intraarterial chemotherapy for non muscle invasive bladder cancer: Promising alternative therapy in high tuberculosis burden countries

INTRODUCTION

Local therapies for high risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) such as intravesical chemotherapy (IVC) have shown a high rate of progression and recurrence. Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for local therapies has been shown to reduce progression and recurrence in patient with NMIBC. However, its potential role is limited in high burden countries for tuberculosis (TB) due to its low specificity that can cause wrong diagnosis or false positive in patients with clinically diagnosed tuberculosis. BCG vaccine that has to be given for most people in tuberculosis endemic countries will induce trained immunity that could reduce the effectivity of intravesical BCG for NMIBC. Moreover, intravesical BCG is contraindicated in patient with or previous tuberculosis. The potential clinical benefit of intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) in delaying the recurrence and progression of high-risk NMIBC have been investigated with promising results. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the potential anti-tumor effect of IAC in NMIBC.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of published articles in Cochrane Library, Pubmed, and Science-Direct to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing IAC alone or combined with IVC versus IVC/BCG alone in NMIBC. The protocol of preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) was applied to this study.

RESULTS

Four RCTs and 4 cohort observational studies were eligible in this study and 5 studies were included in meta-analysis. The risk ratio of tumor recurrence was reduced by 35% (RR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.49-0.87; p = 0.004) in IAC plus IVC, while recurrence-free survival (RFS) was prolonged by 45% (HR: 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69; p < 0.001). The risk of tumor progression was reduced by 45% (RR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.41-0.75; p = 0.002) and tumor progression-free survival (PFS) was also prolonged by 53% (HR: 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.65; p<0.001). Some RCT's had high or unclear risk of bias, meanwhile 4 included cohort studies had overall low risk of bias, therefore the pooled results need to be interpreted cautiously. Subgroup analysis revealed that the heterogeneity outcome of tumour recurrence might be attributed to the difference in NMIBC stages and grades.

CONCLUSIONS

The IAC alone or combined with IVC following bladder tumor resection may lower the risk of tumor recurrence and progression. These findings highlight the importance of further multi institutional randomized controlled trials with bigger sample size using a standardized IAC protocol to validate the current results.

Intra-arterial chemotherapy plus BCG, a promising combination adjuvant treatment for high-risk NMIBC

PURPOSE

To develop a novel combination therapy for high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), namely, intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) plus BCG immunotherapy, and to compare the feasibility and safety of the 2 therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on the data of 119 patients who were diagnosed with high-risk NMIBC and underwent TURBT in the past 5 years. Those who did not complete the treatment were excluded, and the remaining 98 patients were divided into 2 groups: both groups received intravesical BCG immunotherapy, while the BCG+IAC group received 4 courses of extra intra-arterial chemotherapy. Clinical and follow-up data were processed using statistical software.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate was 22.2% in the BCG+IAC group and 35.8% in the BCG group, whereas the progression rates were 8.9% and 24.5%, respectively. In the Kaplan-Meier plot, a statistically significant difference was observed with respect to recurrence-free survival (p = 0.025), as well as the progression-free survival of the two groups was similar (p = 0.019). A total of 22.2% of the patients with adverse effects of IAC and 79.6% of patients suffered from adverse reactions to BCG immunotherapy, and most of the adverse effects were mild and tolerable. Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that multifocal and treatment were independent risk factors for recurrence, while the history of recurrence and treatment were independent risk factors for progression.

CONCLUSION

IAC could be a promising auxiliary treatment for BCG immunotherapy in decreasing the recurrence and progression rate of high-risk NMIBC with little additional toxicity.

Effects of intravenous chemotherapy after TURBT for high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: results of a retrospective study

PURPOSE

This study compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy versus intravesical chemotherapy alone for high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (HRNMIBC) patients after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 349 HRNMIBC cases admitted to TangDu hospital between January 2014 and June 2019. After TURBT, 262 patients received intravesical chemotherapy alone, whereas 87 patients underwent intravesical chemotherapy in combination with intravenous chemotherapy. The recurrence rate and progression rate were assessed by Chi-square test, the prognostic factors for tumor recurrence were predicted by univariable and multivariable Cox hazards analyses, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In this study, the recurrence rate was 24.7% (19/77) in the intravenous chemotherapy combined group and 41.6% (102/245) in the intravesical chemotherapy group, while the progression rate was 6.5% (5/77) and 14.3% (35/245) in the two groups respectively. The two groups differed significantly in recurrence rate (p = 0.007) while the progression rate did not show a significant difference (p = 0.071). Multivariable analyses revealed that additional intravenous chemotherapy treatment was an independent prognostic factor for tumor recurrence in the cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 0.495, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.275-0.892, p = 0.019). Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in RFS and PFS between the two groups, with a log-rank P value of p < 0.005 and p = 0.045, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicity was reported in 2 of 77 patients in the intravenous chemotherapy combined group, including nausea/vomiting 1.3% (1/77) and hypoleukemia 1.3% (1/77).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous chemotherapy of gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with intravesical chemotherapy after TURBT can effectively reduce the postoperative recurrence rate, most toxicities were minor and reversible, and it may be considered as a new choice for HRNMIBC patients.

The Evolving Role of Intra-arterial Chemotherapy in Adult and Pediatric Cancers: A Comprehensive Review

The development of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) was driven by an ambition to mitigate systemic side effects, enhance the bioavailability of drugs, and optimize the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. While the initial research on IAC primarily examined its effectiveness in treating various liver malignancies, the application of this treatment has undergone significant advancements since its introduction. The primary objective of this article is to examine the current range of utilization of IAC, both with and without radiotherapy, while also evaluating the results of relevant clinical trials. Furthermore, this article explores potential future advancements and opportunities in this field. From the scoping review of available articles, it can be concluded that IAC is an effective treatment alternative and, sometimes, a better first-line option, but there is a need for more evidence to make IAC a regular treatment option available for patients.

Application of intra-arterial chemotherapy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To summarize the current evidence on the effects of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) on high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and compare oncology results with intravesical chemotherapy (IVC).

Methods

We performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest by a systematical search of multiple scientific databases in February 2021. The mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous variables respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The hazard radio (HR) with 95% CIs was used for overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of six studies with 866 patients were included. For IAC combined with IVC versus IVC alone, statistically significant differences were found regarding tumor recurrence rate (OR: 0.51, 95% CI [0.36∼0.72], p = 0.0001), tumor progression rate (OR: 0.47, 95% CI [0.30∼0.72], p = 0.0006), tumor-specific death rate (OR: 0.49, 95% CI [0.25∼0.99], p = 0.05), PFS (HR: 0.47, 95% CI [0.23∼0.96], p = 0.04) and RFS (HR: 0.60, 95% CI [0.41∼0.87], p = 0.007). No significant difference between two groups was found for time to first recurrence (MD: 3.27, 95% CI [−2.37∼8.92], p = 0.26) and OS (HR: 1.20, 95% CI [0.44∼3.32], p = 0.72). For IAC alone versus IVC, There was no statistical difference in the terms of tumor-specific death rate (OR: 0.67, 95% CI [0.29∼1.53], p = 0.34), RFS (HR: 0.90, 95% CI [0.56∼1.46], p = 0.68) and PFS (HR: 0.71, 95% CI [0.32∼1.55], p = 0.39). Adverse events mainly included nausea/vomiting (36.3%), hypoleukemia (19.4%), neutropenia (16.0%), increased creatinine (9.9%), increased alanine aminotransferase (18.7%), and thrombocytopenia (9.9%).

Conclusion

The IAC combined with IVC is a safe and effective treatment for high risk NMIBC, with lower rates of recurrence, progression, tumor-specific death, PFS and RFS, and with minor and tolerable events. The effectiveness of the IAC alone is parallel to the IVC alone.

Efficacy of Intra-Arterial Plus Intravesical Chemotherapy for High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Pooled Analysis

Background: The treatment for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains highly debated for its high recurrence and progression risk. This work aimed to verify the efficacy and toxicity of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) plus intravesical chemotherapy (IVC) in high-risk NMIBC.

Methods: A comprehensive online literature search was conducted in three databases to select researches related to IAC + IVC for high-risk NMIBC. All data were analyzed using the Review Manager software version 5.3. And we used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to assessed the quality of these enrolled researches.

Results: Seven eligible original publications were enrolled in our studies with a total of 1,247 patients. Compared with the intravesical instillation, IAC + IVC therapy showed a better therapeutic effect. The total odds ratio for tumor recurrence rate, tumor progression rate, survival rate, and tumor-specific death rate was calculated as 0.51 (95% CI: 0.36–0.72; p < 0.05), 0.51 (95% CI: 0.36–0.72; p < 0.05), 1.75 (95% CI: 1.09–2.81; p < 0.05), and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.28–0.84; p < 0.05), respectively. In patients who received IAC, most of the adverse events (AEs)in the treatment were Grade I and II.

Conclusion: IAC + IVC regimen for high-risk NMIBC could effectively reduce recurrence and progression and provide a better prognosis than intravesical instillation. The adverse events of IAC were mild and acceptable.

The Efficacy of Intra-Arterial Plus Intravesical Chemotherapy Versus Intravesical Chemotherapy Alone After Bladder-Sparing Surgery in High-Risk Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Study

Background

Due to the poor prognosis, the treatment of high-risk bladder cancer (HRBC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to access the efficacy of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) combined with intravesical chemotherapy (IC) versus IC alone after bladder-sparing surgery in HRBC.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, EMBASE (until June 2020) was conducted. PRISMA checklist was followed. The data were analyzed by RevMan v5.3.0.

Results

A total of five articles including 843 patients were studied. The analysis demonstrated that the IAC + IC group had a greater improvement of overall survival (P = 0.02) and significant reduction in terms of tumor recurrence rate (P = 0.0006) and tumor progression rate (P = 0.008) compared with the IC group. The recurrence-free survival in the IAC + IC group was significantly higher than that in the IC group (P = 0.004), but there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.32). In addition, the combination of IAC and IC significantly extended tumor recurrence interval (P = 0.0001) and reduced tumor-specific death rate (P = 0.01) for patients with HRBC compared with IC alone. For side effects related with IAC, although about half of the patients experienced some toxicities, most of them were mild and reversible (grades 1-2, 22.3% vs. grade 3-4, 2.7%), mainly including nausea/vomiting (P = 0.0001), neutropenia (P = 0.002), and alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Patients with HRBC treated with IAC + IC after bladder-sparing surgery had a marked improvement in the overall survival, recurrence-free survival, time interval to first recurrence, tumor recurrence rate, tumor progression rate, and tumor-specific death rate than patients treated with IC alone. However, progression-free survival was not significantly correlated with treatment strategy. In addition, patients seemed to tolerate well the toxicities related with IAC.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021232679.

Intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy compared with intravesical BCG immunotherapy retrospectively in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) combined with intravesical chemotherapy (IVC) against intravesical BCG immunotherapy in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

130 patients with high-risk NMIBC who had underwent TURBT were divided into two groups, of which IAC + IVC group received four courses of IAC (cisplatin and epirubicin) combined with IVC (epirubicin or pirarubicin) after surgery and BCG group received intravesical BCG immunotherapy. Recurrence rate and progression rate were assessed by Chi-square test, while recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In this study, the recurrence rate was 27.9% (12/43) in IAC + IVC group and 26.4% (14/53) in BCG group, while progression rate was 9.3% (4/43) in IAC + IVC group and 9.4% (5/53) in BCG group. Both of the recurrence and progression rate did not show a significant difference. In the Kaplan-Meier plot, no difference was found with respect to recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival. Moreover, 46.5% (20/43) patients suffered from adverse events of IAC and 83.1% (49/59) patients suffered from adverse events associated with BCG, of which 6 patients discontinued treatment due to serious adverse events of BCG. Univariate analysis suggested that only recurrent tumor could be an independent risk factor related to recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

IAC combined with IVC used in high-risk NMIBC could reduce the recurrence and progression as effective as BCG instillation with lower adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is the most common bladder cancer. Many studies have reported that intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) combined with intravesical chemotherapy (IVC) could effectively reduce the recurrence rate of NMIBC. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of IAC combined with IVC for patients with high-risk NMIBC.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and 4 Chinese databases will be searched for eligible studies published without language restrictions from their inception up August 31, 2019. Subgroup analysis will be mainly explored in study design, types of chemotherapy drugs, and sample size. Cochrane Collaboration Risk of bias Tool will be applied in evaluating the quality of enrolled articles. Statistical analysis will be carried out by the Stata version 14.0 software.

RESULTS

The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary outcomes include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse reactions and toxicity grade coded by common toxicity criteria for adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study will provide latest evidence to verify whether IAC combined with IVC is more effective and safer than IVC alone for patients with high-risk NMIBC.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019146847.

Efficacy of intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy in T1G3 bladder cancer when compared with intravesical chemotherapy alone after bladder-sparing surgery: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) combined with intravesical chemotherapy (IVC) in T1G3 bladder cancer (Bca) after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT).

METHODS

Our study retrospectively reviewed 200 patients with T1G3 BCa who had all undergone TURBT. The patients' medical records were divided into two groups, one group only had IVC with pirarubicin after surgery, and the other group had IAC (cisplatin and epirubicin) combined with IVC after surgery. The patients were monitored regularly by urine cytology and cystoscopy. Survival and recurrence curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor recurrence, progression and tumor-specific death rate were compared with Chi-square test. A multivariate analysis was carried out to find out potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 200 medical record was analyzed, 131 patients received IVC, 69 IAC + IVC treatment, tumor-specific death rate between the combined IAC and IVC compared to IVC alone was 7.25 and 17.6%, respectively (p < 0.05); the tumor recurrence rate between the two groups was 31.8% (22/69) and 44.3%, respectively (58/131) (p < 0.05), and tumor recurred later in the IAC + IVC group (p < 0.05), tumor progression rate was 18.8% (13/69) and 28.2% (37/131), respectively, with p < 0.05. Overall survival was longer in IAC + IVC group (p < 0.05). Using the multivariable regression model, IAC was significantly related to disease recurrence (p < 0.05) and overall survival (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

T1G3 BCa post-TURBT surgery patients who underwent IAC combined with IVC had a longer overall survival and increased time interval to first recurrence, lower tumor recurrence rate, progression rate and tumor-specific death rate than compared with those who only underwent IVC alone.

The effects of intra-arterial chemotherapy on bladder preservation in patients with T1 stage bladder cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of intra-arterial chemotherapy on T1 stage bladder cancer (Bca) and evaluate patient outcome with bladder-preserving treatment approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 238 patients with T1 stage Bca were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 35 patients were categorized into the subgroup of highest-risk T1 stage according to the European Association of Urology guidelines and received immediate radical cystectomy (RC group), whereas 62 were classified as being highest-risk T1 patients but were unwilling to undergo RC and were treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin intra-arterial chemotherapy (GC group). There were 141 T1 patients who had bladder-preserving surgery with intravesical chemotherapy (IVC group).

RESULTS

For patients with T1 stage Bca, the GC group had a higher estimated recurrence-free survival rate (44.4 vs. 13.9%, P = 0.087), progression-free survival rate (75.4 vs. 32.8%, P = 0.006), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate (78.7 vs. 67.5%, P = 0.399) when compared with the IVC group, respectively. Using the multivariable regression model, the GC intra-arterial chemotherapy was significantly related to bladder preservation (P = 0.004), lower recurrence (P = 0.012), and less progression (P = 0.004). For patients with the highest-risk T1 stage, GC group did not have a poorer CSS rate in comparison with the RC group (P = 0.383). Moreover, immediate RC did not confer a survival benefit in terms of CSS when compared with those who underwent deferred RC after failing GC intra-arterial chemotherapy (P = 0.283).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin intra-arterial chemotherapy may be an effective bladder-preserving alternative adjuvant treatment for patients with T1 stage Bca with oncologic benefits, good compliance, and low toxicity.

A prospective comparison of intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy and intravesical chemotherapy alone after transurethral resection with a thulium laser in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Objective To compare intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy with intravesical chemotherapy alone in the treatment of high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HRBC) after thulium laser resection of a bladder tumor (TmLRBT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2009 to December 2013, 283 patients with HRBC were randomly assigned to the combined group (group A, n = 141) or intravesical chemotherapy-alone group (group B, n = 142) after TmLRBT. Intra-arterial chemotherapy was administered after initial TmLRBT, with 3 courses at 4-week intervals. Each course consisted of cisplatin (50 mg/m²) and epirubicin (30 mg/m²). Intravesical chemotherapy was administered in both groups, including an immediate 50 mg of epirubicin instillation after TmLRBT and weekly maintenance for 8 weeks, followed by monthly maintenance for 1 year.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate was 29.1% (41/141) in group A and 42.9% (61/142) in group B, with a significant difference (p = 0.01). The progression rate was 15.6% (22/141) in group A and 25.3% (36/142) in group B, with a significant difference (p = 0.039). Patients with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) also had a lower recurrence rate and progression rate in group A compared to those in group B (p = 0.006 and p = 0.03, respectively). On univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, patients with low-grade histology had a higher reccurrence-free rate. Multivariate COX analysis of tumor-related factors suggested that concomitant CIS was the only significant prognostic factor associated with poorer recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy could reduce the risk of recurrence and progression compared to intravesical chemotherapy alone in HRBC.

Intravenous chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy to treat T1G3 bladder urothelial carcinoma after transurethral resection of bladder tumor: results of a retrospective study

Objective

The management of stage 1 and grade 3 (T1G3) bladder cancer continues to be controversial. Although the transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by intravesical chemotherapy is a conservative strategy for treatment of T1G3 bladder cancer, a relatively high risk of tumor recurrence and progression remains regarding the therapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy versus intravesical chemotherapy alone for T1G3 bladder cancer after TURBT surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 457 patients who were newly diagnosed with T1G3 bladder urothelial carcinoma between January 2009 and March 2014. After TURBT, 281 patients received intravesical chemotherapy alone, whereas 176 patients underwent intravesical chemotherapy in combination with intravenous chemotherapy. Tumor recurrence and progression were monitored periodically by urine cytology and cystoscopy in follow-up. Recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival of the two chemotherapy strategies following TURBT were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable Cox hazards analyses were performed to predict the prognostic factors for tumor recurrence and progression.

Results

The tumor recurrence rate was 36.7% for patients who received intravesical chemotherapy alone after TURBT, compared with 19.9% for patients who received intravenous chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy after TURBT (P<0.001). The progression rate was 10.6% for patients who underwent intravesical chemotherapy alone and 2.3% for patients who underwent the combined chemotherapies (P=0.003). Kaplan–Meier curves showed significant differences in recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival between the two treatment strategies, with a log-rank P-value of <0.001 and 0.003, respectively. Multivariable analyses revealed that intravenous chemotherapy was the independent prognostic factor for tumor recurrence and progression in the cohort.

Conclusion

Intravenous chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy offers a better oncologic outcome than the intravesical chemotherapy alone for patients with T1G3 bladder urothelial carcinoma after TURBT, and it may be considered as a new therapy strategy for T1G3 bladder cancer.