1
|
Moussa M, Abou Chakra M, Shore ND, Papatsoris A, Farahat Y, O'Donnell MA. Patterns of treatment of high-risk BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients among Arab urologists. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2024; 96:12244. [PMID: 38502039 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To understand the treatment plans suggested for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive disease (NMIBC) patients in the Arab countries and therapeutic decisions applied for BCG-naive patients during BCG shortage time. METHODS A 10-minute online survey was distributed through the Arab Association of Urology (AAU) office to urologists in the Arab countries who treat patients with NMIBC. RESULTS One hundred six urologists responded to the survey. The majority of urologists had treated, in the past 6 months, > 10 patients with NMIBC who were considered BCG-unresponsive (55% of respondents). Radical cystectomy (RC) was the most popular treatment option (recommended by 50%) for these patients. This was followed by intravesical chemotherapy (30%), repeat BCG therapy (12%), resection with ongoing surveillance (8%). Clinical trials and intravenous checkpoint inhibitors were never selected. The most preferred intravesical chemotherapy was by ranking: 60% gemcitabine, 19% mitomycin C, 8% docetaxel, 8% gemcitabine/docetaxel, 4% sequential gemcitabine/mitomycin C, and 1% valrubicin. The use of intravesical chemotherapy appears limited by Arab urologists due to concerns regarding clinical efficacy (fear of progression) and the lack of clear recommendations by urology societies. Given the BCG shortage, which may vary per Arab country, Arab urologists have adjusted by prioritizing BCG for T1 and carcinoma in situ (CIS) patients over Ta, adapting intravesical chemotherapy, and reducing the dose/strength of BCG administered. Most physicians report an eagerness to utilize novel therapies to address the BCG deficit, especially to try intravesical chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Even though Arab urologists are in the majority of cases selecting RC for BCG-unresponsive cases, one-third of them are most recently initiating intravesical chemotherapy as an alternative option. To further assist Arab urologists in the appropriate selection of BCG unresponsive high risk NMIBC patient treatments, enhanced education and pathway protocols are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC.
| | | | - Yasser Farahat
- Urology Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elmohamady B, Omar M, El-Dakhakhny AS, Sayedahmed K, Ghazwani Y, Bin Hamri S, Alkhayal A, Alrabeeah K, Kamal W, Abbasy M, Farahat Y, Noureldin YA. Effects of first year COVID-19 pandemic on urology practice in three major Arab Countries: Sub-Analysis of a survey by Arab association of urology research group. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0293458. [PMID: 38236912 PMCID: PMC10796057 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic on March 11, 2020. The health care system faced tremendous challenges in providing ethical and high-quality care. The impact of COVID-19 on urological practices varied widely worldwide, including in Arab countries. This study aimed to compare the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology practice in Egypt, the KSA, and the UAE during the first year of the pandemic. METHODS This sub-analysis assessed the demographics and COVID-19's effects on urological practice in terms of adjustments to hospital policy, including outpatient consultations, the management of elective and urgent surgical cases, and the continuation of education across the three countries. The availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and urologists' emotional, physical, and verbal intimidation during COVID-19 were also compared. RESULTS Regarding the impact on hospital policy, consultations replaced by telemedicine were significantly higher in the KSA (36.15%), followed by the UAE (33.3%), then Egypt (10.4%) (P = 0.008). Elective cases requiring ICU admission were 65.1% in Egypt, 45.2% in the KSA, and 58.2% in the UAE and were performed only in high-risk patients. PPE was freely available in 20.8% of the Egyptian hospitals compared to 83.3% in the KSA and 81.8% in the UAE. Online courses were significantly higher in Egypt (70.8%), followed by the UAE (53%) and the KSA (41.7%) (P = 0.02). Emotional intimidation was higher than verbal intimidation, representing 80%, 75.9%, and 76% in the UAE, KSA, and Egypt, respectively. CONCLUSION This sub-analysis outlined significant hospital policy changes across the three Arab countries. Exposure to emotional, verbal, and physical intimidation was observed. The development of teleconsultations and online platforms for educational purposes was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basheer Elmohamady
- Department of Urology, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Omar
- Department of Urology, Menoufiya University Hospital, Menoufiya, Egypt
| | - Amr S. El-Dakhakhny
- Department of Urology, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
| | - Khalid Sayedahmed
- Department of Urology, Menoufiya University Hospital, Menoufiya, Egypt
| | - Yahia Ghazwani
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, KSA
- Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, KSA
| | - Saeed Bin Hamri
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, KSA
- Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, KSA
| | - Abdullah Alkhayal
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, KSA
- Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, KSA
| | - Khalid Alrabeeah
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, KSA
- Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, KSA
| | - Wissam Kamal
- Department of Urology, King Fahd Hospital, Jeddah, KSA
| | - Mohamed Abbasy
- Emergency Medicine Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yasser Farahat
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
- Urology Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, UAE
| | - Yasser A. Noureldin
- Department of Urology, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
- Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, KSA
- Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zeng G, Zhong W, Chaussy CG, Tiselius HG, Xu C, Turney B, Turk C, Tailly GG, Preminger GM, Akpinar H, Petrik A, Bernardo N, Wiseman O, Farahat Y, Budia A, Jones DK, Beltran Suarez E, De Marco F, Mazzon G, Lv J, Natchagande G, Guven S, Ibrahim TAA, Xu H, Xie L, Ye Z, Sarica K. International Alliance of Urolithiasis Guideline on Shockwave Lithotripsy. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:513-523. [PMID: 36435718 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Different international associations have proposed their own guidelines on urolithiasis. However, the focus is primarily on an overview of the principles of urolithiasis management rather than step-by-step technical details for the procedure. The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) is releasing a series of guidelines on the management of urolithiasis. The current guideline on shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the third in the IAU guidelines series and provides a clinical framework for urologists and technicians performing SWL. A total of 49 recommendations are summarized and graded, covering the following aspects: indications and contraindications; preoperative patient evaluation; preoperative medication; prestenting; intraoperative analgesia or anesthesia; intraoperative position; stone localization and monitoring; machine and energy settings; intraoperative lithotripsy strategies; auxiliary therapy following SWL; evaluation of stone clearance; complications; and quality of life. The recommendations, tips, and tricks regarding SWL procedures summarized here provide important and necessary guidance for urologists along with technicians performing SWL. PATIENT SUMMARY: For kidney and urinary stones of less than 20 mm in size, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is an approach in which the stone is treated with shockwaves applied to the skin, without the need for surgery. Our recommendations on technical aspects of the procedure provide guidance for urologists and technicians performing SWL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Wen Zhong
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Christian G Chaussy
- University of Munich, Munich, Germany; University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Hans Göran Tiselius
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Changbao Xu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ben Turney
- Department of Urology, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christian Turk
- Department of Urology, Hospital of the Sisters of Charity, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Glenn M Preminger
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Haluk Akpinar
- Department of Urology, Florence Nightingale Hospitals Group, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ales Petrik
- Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Norberto Bernardo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Oliver Wiseman
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yasser Farahat
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Alberto Budia
- Department of Urology, La Fe Polytechnic University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - David K Jones
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Edgar Beltran Suarez
- Department of Urology, Specialty Hospital La Raza, National Medical Center of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ferdinando De Marco
- Urology Division, Istituto Neurotraumatologico Italiano-Grottaferrata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Jianlin Lv
- Department of Urology, Jiangning Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | | | - Selcuk Guven
- Urology Department, Meram School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | | | - Hanfeng Xu
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Henyang, China
| | - Lei Xie
- Department of Urology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Biruni University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al Hashimi M, Farahat Y, Kandil H, Al Khalidi I. Androgenic-anabolic steroid abuse trend and management: A prospective, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e1032. [PMID: 36628108 PMCID: PMC9827233 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Androgenic-anabolic steroid (AAS) abuse is a global health concern, studies revealing an increasing trend of abuse and deleterious effects on reproductive health. Unfortunately, there is no consensus about management pathways due to the lack of specific guidelines. Methods A prospective study, multicentre, online survey, composed of 30 questions, was conducted to investigate the current trend of AAS abuse and the management followed by practitioners from different specialities dealing with this condition. Results A total of 151 respondents were included. The majority were general urologists (68.21%), andrologists (22.51%), and endocrinologists (9.28%). An increasing trend of AAS abuse was noticed by 90.73% of participants mostly in young age populations. Most of AAS abusers were presented with infertility (64.24%) and erectile dysfunction (59.60%), and their investigations showed abnormal semen analysis (77.48%), abnormal hormones (follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, testosterone, and estradiol) (94.70%), and reduction in testicular size (50.33%). Most of respondents expected: the need of long duration for spontaneous recovery (6-12 months), relapse of AAS abuse in one-third of patients, less knowledge about the adverse effects (39.74%), and risk of drug dependence (54.30%). Immediate treatment was the most offered plan of management (44.37%) followed by a waiting spontaneous recovery (32.45%), while the remaining would refer the patients to an either endocrinologist or andrologist. The treating physicians did not follow specific guidelines and most of participants (44.44%) reverted to their personal experience in the management. Conclusions Our study revealed an increasing trend of AAS abuse, deleterious effects of AAS use on reproductive health, and lack of consensuses among the treating physicians regarding the management of related adverse effects. Our study could be considered a call to the scientific bodies to have more studies, establish guidelines for management, and to have better awareness of this serious public health concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manaf Al Hashimi
- Urology DepartmentBurjeel HospitalAbu DhabiUAE,Khalifa UniversityCollege of Medicine and Health SciencesAbu DhabiUAE
| | - Yasser Farahat
- Urology DepartmentShaikh Khalifa HospitalUmm Al QuwainUAE
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zeng G, Zhao Z, Mazzon G, Pearle M, Choong S, Skolarikos A, Denstedt J, Seitz C, Olvera Pasada D, Fiori C, Bosio A, Papatsoris A, Méndez Probst CE, Perez Fentes D, Ann Git K, Wu Q, Wiseman O, Emiliani E, Farahat Y, Ilker Gökce M, Giannakopoulos S, Goumas Kartalas I, Somani B, Knoll T, de la Rosette J, Zhong J, Vinicius Maroccolo M, Saltirov L, Chew B, Wang K, Lahme S, Giusti G, Ferretti S, Yong Cho S, Geavlete P, Cansino R, Kamphuis GM, Smith D, Matlaga BR, Ghani KD, Bernardo N, Silva AD, Ng ACF, Yang S, Gao X, Traxer O, Miernik A, Liatsikos E, Priyakant Parikh K, Duvdevani M, Celia A, Yasui T, Aquino A, Alomar M, Choonhaklai V, Erkurt B, Glass J, Sriprasad S, Osther PJ, Keeley FX, Preminger GM, Cepeda Delgado M, Beltran Suarez E, Ye Z, Sarica K. European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Management of Renal Stones. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1461-1468. [PMID: 34836838 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has become the preferred treatment modality for nephrolithiasis. However, because of ongoing uncertainties regarding the optimal perioperative management, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up, as well as a lack of standardization for outcome reporting, consensus is needed to achieve more uniform clinical practice worldwide. OBJECTIVE To develop recommendations for RIRS on the basis of existing data and expert consensus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A protocol-driven, three-phase study was conducted by the European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) and the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU). The process included: (1) a nonsystematic review of the literature to define domains for discussion; (2) a two-round modified Delphi survey involving experts in this field; and (3) an additional group meeting and third-round survey involving 64 senior representative members to formulate the final conclusions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The results from each previous round were returned to the participants for re-evaluation of their decisions during the next round. The agreement threshold was set at 70%. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The panel included 209 participants who developed 29 consensus statements on the following topics of interest: (1) perioperative infection management; (2) perioperative antithrombotic therapy; (3) fundamentals of the operative technique; and (4) standardized outcome reporting. Although this consensus can be considered as a useful reference for more clinically oriented daily practice, we also acknowledge that a higher level of evidence from further clinical trials is needed. CONCLUSIONS The consensus statements aim to guide and standardize clinical practice and research on RIRS and to recommend standardized outcome reporting. PATIENT SUMMARY An international consensus on the best practice for minimally invasive surgery for kidney stones was organized and developed by two international societies. It is anticipated that this consensus will provide further guidance to urologists and may help to improve clinical outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Zhijian Zhao
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Margaret Pearle
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Simon Choong
- Institute of Urology, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Andreas Skolarikos
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - John Denstedt
- Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Olvera Pasada
- Department of Urology, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, TecSalud, San Pedro Garza García, Mexico
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Bosio
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Daniel Perez Fentes
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Kah Ann Git
- Department of Urology, Pantai Hospital, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Qinghui Wu
- Urology Center, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Oliver Wiseman
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Yasser Farahat
- Department of Urology, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Mehmet Ilker Gökce
- Department of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Thomas Knoll
- Department of Urology, Mannheim University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jiehui Zhong
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Lliya Saltirov
- Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ben Chew
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kunjie Wang
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Sven Lahme
- Department of Urology, Siloah St. Trudpert Hospital, Pforzheim, Germany
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Ferretti
- Department of Urology, Hospital and University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sung Yong Cho
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Petrisor Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ramon Cansino
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Guido M Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daron Smith
- Institute of Urology, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Brian R Matlaga
- Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Khurshid D Ghani
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Norberto Bernardo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Andres D Silva
- Department of Urology, Hospital del Salvador, Salvador, Chile
| | - Anthony C F Ng
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Sixing Yang
- Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaofeng Gao
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Arkadiusz Miernik
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Evangelos Liatsikos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Kandarp Priyakant Parikh
- Department of Genitourinary Surgery, Minimal Access Surgery Training Institute, Shyam Urosurgical Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Mordechai Duvdevani
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Antonio Celia
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Nephrourology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Albert Aquino
- Department of Urology, Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center, Manila, Philippines
| | - Mohammad Alomar
- Department of Urology, King Khalid University Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Bulent Erkurt
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jonathan Glass
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Seshadri Sriprasad
- Department of Urology, Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, UK
| | - Palle J Osther
- Department of Urology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Francis X Keeley
- Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Glenn M Preminger
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Edgar Beltran Suarez
- Department of Urology, Specialty Hospital La Raza, National Medical Center of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Biruni University, Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Noureldin YA, Elmohamady B, El-Dakhakhny AS, Omar M, Desoky EE, Ghazwani Y, Hamri SB, Alkhayal A, Alrabeeah K, Kamal W, Farag F, Farahat Y. How did the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic affect urology practice in Arab countries? A cross-sectional study by the Arab Association of Urology research group. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221079492. [PMID: 35251310 PMCID: PMC8891825 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221079492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess of the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on urology practice in the Arab world during the first year of the crisis. Methods: An Internet-based questionnaire was created and sent out via email to members of the Arab Association of Urology (AAU) using ‘Google Forms’. The survey assessed participants’ demographics in terms of age, gender, country of origin, type of practice and position. Impacts of COVID-19 on urological practice were assessed in terms of the changes in hospital policies regarding consultations, and elective and emergency surgical cases. Moreover, impacts of COVID-19 on urologists were assessed. Results: A total of 255 AAU members across 14 Arab countries (Emirates, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Jordan, Algeria, Kuwait, Yemen, Qatar, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Sudan and Syria) completed the survey; 4% were female urologists. Consultations at outpatient clinics were closed or restricted to emergency cases or replaced by telemedicine in almost 15%, 40% and 25% of hospitals, respectively. Elective surgeries were stopped or reduced to under 25% of surgical capacity in >10% and about 25% of hospitals, respectively. Almost 90% (228) reported changes in the policy for emergency theatres. Nearly 65% of hospitals offered preoperative COVID-19 testing to patients and 50% of hospitals provided personal protective equipment (PPE) to their urologists. Of 99% (253) who reported a change in urological education, 95% relied on online webinars. About 56% of respondents had their own private practice, of whom 91% continued private practice during the crisis. About 38% of participants reported exposure to intimidation (75% emotional, 20% verbal and 5% physical). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in major changes in hospitals’ policies regarding outpatient consultations, elective and emergency operative cases, and the shift to telemedicine. Arab urologists have been facing major challenges either in both the governmental or the private sectors, and some of them were exposed to emotional, verbal and even physical intimidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser A. Noureldin
- Department of Urology, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha 13511, Egypt
- Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Basheer Elmohamady
- Department of Urology, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
| | - Amr S. El-Dakhakhny
- Department of Urology, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Omar
- Department of Urology, Menoufiya University Hospital, Menoufiya, Egypt
| | - Esam E.A. Desoky
- Department of Urology, Zagazig University Hospital, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Yahia Ghazwani
- Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saeed Bin Hamri
- Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Alkhayal
- Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Alrabeeah
- Division of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wissam Kamal
- Department of Urology, King Fahd Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fawzy Farag
- Department of Urology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt
| | - Yasser Farahat
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
- Urology Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aboutaleb H, Eldib DB, Farahat Y, Abouelgreed TA, Zanaty F. Efficacy of Bladder Ultrasound in Prediction of Resolution of Vesicoureteral Reflux After Endoscopic Subureteral Hyaluronic Acid/Dextranomer (Deflux) Injection. Urology 2022. [DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
8
|
Aboutaleb H, Eldib DB, Farahat Y, Abouelgreed TA, Zanaty F. Efficacy of bladder ultrasound in prediction of resolution of vesicoureteral reflux after endoscopic subureteral hyaluronic Acid/Dextranome (Deflux®) injection. Urology 2022; 165:299-304. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
9
|
Zeng G, Zhong W, Pearle M, Choong S, Chew B, Skolarikos A, Liatsikos E, Pal SK, Lahme S, Durutovic O, Farahat Y, Khadgi S, Desai M, Chi T, Smith D, Hoznek A, Papatsoris A, Desai J, Mazzon G, Somani B, Eisner B, Scoffone CM, Nguyen D, Ferretti S, Giusti G, Saltirov I, Maroccolo MV, Gökce MI, Straub M, Bernardo N, Lantin PL, Saulat S, Gamal W, Denstedt J, Ye Z, Sarica K. European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:588-597. [PMID: 33741299 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been performed for decades and has gone through many refinements, there are still concerns regarding its more widespread utilization because of the long learning curve and the potential risk of severe complications. Many technical details are not included in the guidelines because of their nature and research protocol. OBJECTIVE To achieve an expert consensus viewpoint on PCNL indications, preoperative patient preparation, surgical strategy, management and prevention of severe complications, postoperative management, and follow-up. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An international panel of experts from the Urolithiasis Section of the European Association of Urology, International Alliance of Urolithiasis, and other urology associations was enrolled, and a prospectively conducted study, incorporating literature review, discussion on research gaps (RGs), and questionnaires and following data analysis, was performed to reach a consensus on PCNL. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The expert panel consisted of 36 specialists in PCNL from 20 countries all around the world. A consensus on PCNL was developed. The expert panel was not as large as expected, and the discussion on RGs did not bring in more supportive evidence in the present consensus. CONCLUSIONS Adequate preoperative preparation, especially elimination of urinary tract infection prior to PCNL, accurate puncture with guidance of fluoroscopy and/or ultrasonography or a combination, keeping a low intrarenal pressure, and shortening of operation time during PCNL are important technical requirements to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNL. PATIENT SUMMARY Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been a well-established procedure for the management of upper urinary tract stones. However, according to an expert panel consensus, core technical aspects, as well as the urologist's experience, are critical to the safety and effectiveness of PCNL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen Zhong
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Margaret Pearle
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Simon Choong
- Institute of Urology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ben Chew
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Evangelos Liatsikos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Sven Lahme
- Department of Urology, Siloah St. Trudpert Hospital, Pforzheim, Germany
| | - Otas Durutovic
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Urology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Yasser Farahat
- Department of Urology, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Sanjay Khadgi
- Department of Urology, Vayodha Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Mahesh Desai
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India
| | - Thomas Chi
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daron Smith
- Institute of Urology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andras Hoznek
- Department of Urology, Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | | | - Janak Desai
- Department of Urology, Samved Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Brian Eisner
- Deparment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Stefania Ferretti
- Department of Urology, Hospital and University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Iliya Saltirov
- Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Mehmet Ilker Gökce
- Department of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Michael Straub
- Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norberto Bernardo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Sherjeel Saulat
- Department of Urology, Sindh Institution of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Wael Gamal
- Department of Urology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt
| | - John Denstedt
- Division of Urology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Biruni University, Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liem EI, McCormack M, Chan ES, Matsui Y, Geavlete P, Choi YD, de Reijke TM, Farahat Y, Inman BA, de la Rosette JJ, Naito S. Monopolar vs. bipolar transurethral resection for non–muscle invasive bladder carcinoma: A post-hoc analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:338.e1-338.e11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
11
|
Saglam R, Patel A, Rassweiler J, Klein J, Farahat Y, Al Zarooni A, Bedir S, Müslümanoglu A, Tokatli Z, Sarica K. V03-05 TREATMENT OF LARGE KIDNEY STONES BY USING ROBOTIC ASSISTED FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY. J Urol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
12
|
Patel A, Klein J, Farahat Y, Tokatli NZ, Kabakci AS, Saglam R. V11-02 AVICENNA ROBOFLEX, FOR ROBOTIC ASSISTED RETROGRADE INTRARENAL LASER LITHOTRIPSY OF THE KIDNEY STONES, LARGER THAN 2 CM. J Urol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
13
|
Elsakka AM, Eltatawy HH, Almekaty KH, Ramadan AR, Gameel TA, Farahat Y. A prospective randomised controlled study comparing bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate to monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Arab J Urol 2016; 14:280-286. [PMID: 27900218 PMCID: PMC5122807 DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Revised: 09/17/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To compare the safety and efficacy of bipolar transurethral plasma vaporisation (B-TUVP) as an alternative to the ‘gold standard’ monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a prospective randomised controlled study. Patients and methods In all, 82 patients indicated for prostatectomy were assigned to two groups, group I (40 patients) underwent B-TUVP and group II (42 patients) underwent M-TURP. The safety of both techniques was evaluated by reporting perioperative changes in serum Na+, serum K+, haematocrit (packed cell volume), and any perioperative complications. For the efficacy assessment, patients were evaluated subjectively by comparing the improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score and objectively by measuring the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) before and after the procedures. Results In group II, there was a significant perioperative drop in serum Na+ (from 137.5 to 129.4 mmol/L) and haematocrit (from 42.9% to 38.2%) (both P < 0.001). Moreover, one patient in group II had TUR syndrome. The remote postoperative complication rate was (15%) in group I and comprised of stress urinary incontinence (5%), bladder outlet obstruction (5%), and residual adenoma (5%). In group II, the remote postoperative complication rate was (4.8%), as two patients developed urethral stricture. There were statistically significant improvements in micturition variables postoperatively in both arms, but the magnitude of improvement was statistically more significant in group II. Conclusion B-TUPV seems to be safer than M-TURP; however, the lack of a tissue specimen and the relatively high retreatment rate are major disadvantages of the B-TUVP technique. Moreover, M-TURP appears to be more effective than B-TUPV and its safety can be improved by careful case selection and adequate haemostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Yasser Farahat
- Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rassweiler J, Sarica K, Geavlete P, Tokatli NZ, Klein J, Traxer O, Al Zarooni A, Farahat Y, Hoenig DM, Giusti G, Tugcu V, Imamoglu MA, Muslumanoglu AY, Savas M, Saglam R, Patel A. V6-11 THE NEW DEVELOPMENTS OF THE ROBOTIC ASSISTED RETROGRADE INTRA-RENAL SURGERY (RA-RIRS) WITH AVICENNA ROBOFLEX. J Urol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
15
|
Tawfik A, El-ashry U, Farahat Y, Abo El-enen M. MP34-08 LIMITATION OF NEEDLE DEVIATION DURING TRIANGULATED PERCUTANEOUS RENAL ACCESS: INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH A NOVEL SIMPLE DEVICE. J Urol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.1566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
16
|
Zowawi HM, Forde BM, Alfaresi M, Alzarouni A, Farahat Y, Chong TM, Yin WF, Chan KG, Li J, Schembri MA, Beatson SA, Paterson DL. Stepwise evolution of pandrug-resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Sci Rep 2015; 5:15082. [PMID: 26478520 PMCID: PMC4609946 DOI: 10.1038/srep15082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2015] [Accepted: 09/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose an urgent risk to global human health. CRE that are non-susceptible to all commercially available antibiotics threaten to return us to the pre-antibiotic era. Using Single Molecule Real Time (SMRT) sequencing we determined the complete genome of a pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate, representing the first complete genome sequence of CRE resistant to all commercially available antibiotics. The precise location of acquired antibiotic resistance elements, including mobile elements carrying genes for the OXA-181 carbapenemase, were defined. Intriguingly, we identified three chromosomal copies of an ISEcp1-bla(OXA-181) mobile element, one of which has disrupted the mgrB regulatory gene, accounting for resistance to colistin. Our findings provide the first description of pandrug-resistant CRE at the genomic level, and reveal the critical role of mobile resistance elements in accelerating the emergence of resistance to other last resort antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hosam M Zowawi
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Herston QLD 4029, Australia.,Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infection Prevention and Control, and the Gulf Cooperation Council Center for Infection Control, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Brian M Forde
- Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Mubarak Alfaresi
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department at Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Abdulqadir Alzarouni
- Urology Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Yasser Farahat
- Urology Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Teik-Min Chong
- Division of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Wai-Fong Yin
- Division of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kok-Gan Chan
- Division of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jian Li
- Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Mark A Schembri
- Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Scott A Beatson
- Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - David L Paterson
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Herston QLD 4029, Australia.,Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Raheem AA, Farahat Y, El-Gamal O, Ragab M, Radwan M, El-Bahnasy AH, El-Gamasy AN, Rasheed M. Role of posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis: a pilot study. J Urol 2012; 189:1514-8. [PMID: 23103798 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the early clinical and urodynamic results of posterior tibial nerve stimulation in patients with refractory monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis. MATERIALS AND METHODS We randomly assigned 28 patients with refractory monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis to 2 equal groups. Group 1 received a weekly session of posterior tibial nerve stimulation for 12 weeks and group 2 was the placebo group. Evaluation was performed in each group at baseline and after posterior tibial nerve stimulation to compare clinical and urodynamic findings. Another clinical assessment was done 3 months after the first followup. RESULTS The 2 groups were comparable in baseline clinical and urodynamic data. Overall, 13 patients (46.4%) had detrusor overactivity and 14 (50%) had decreased bladder capacity. After treatment 11 group 1 patients (78.6%) had a partial or full response to posterior tibial nerve stimulation but only 2 (14.3%) in group 2 had a partial response (p = 0.002). Also, the average number of wet nights in group 1 was significantly lower than at baseline (p = 0.002). All urodynamic parameters significantly improved in group 1. In contrast, the number of wet nights and urodynamic parameters did not change significantly in group 2. At 3-month followup the number of patients with a partial or full response in group 1 had decreased from 11 (78.6%) to 6 (42.9%). No change was evident in group 2. CONCLUSIONS Posterior tibial nerve stimulation can be a viable treatment option in some patients with refractory monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis. However, deterioration in some responders with time suggests the need for maintenance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Abdel Raheem
- Urology Department, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta, El Gharbia, Egypt.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Farahat Y, Elsaka A, Rasheed M. MP-06.10: Prospective randomized study for long term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in patients with refractory overactive bladder: maintenance protocol. Urology 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
19
|
Rasheed M, Farahat Y, Elbahnasy A, Gaber M, Mourad S. MP-02.11: Application of small intestinal submucosa graft in repair of complicated vesico-vaginal fistula: pilot study. Urology 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|