Reducing Pain by Artificial Ascites Infusion During Radiofrequency Ablation for Subcapsular Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Local Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2024 Expert Consensus-Based Practical Recommendations of the Korean Liver Cancer Association

Local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma, a non-surgical option that directly targets and destroys tumor cells, has advanced significantly since the 1990s. Therapies with different energy sources, such as radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation, employ different mechanisms to induce tumor necrosis. The precision, safety, and effectiveness of these therapies have increased with advances in guiding technologies and device improvements. Consequently, local ablation has become the first-line treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. The lack of organized evidence and expert opinions regarding patient selection, preprocedure preparation, procedural methods, swift post-treatment evaluation, and follow-up has resulted in clinicians following varied practices. Therefore, an expert consensus-based practical recommendation for local ablation was developed by a group of experts in radiology and hepatology from the Research Committee of the Korean Liver Cancer Association in collaboration with the Korean Society of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation to provide useful information and guidance for performing local ablation and for the pre- and post-treatment management of patients.

Local Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2024 Expert Consensus-Based Practical Recommendations of the Korean Liver Cancer Association

Local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a non-surgical option that directly targets and destroys tumor cells, has advanced significantly since the 1990s. Therapies with different energy sources, such as radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation, employ different mechanisms to induce tumor necrosis. The precision, safety, and effectiveness of these therapies have increased with advances in guiding technologies and device improvements. Consequently, local ablation has become the first-line treatment for early-stage HCC. The lack of organized evidence and expert opinions regarding patient selection, pre-procedure preparation, procedural methods, swift post-treatment evaluation, and follow-up has resulted in clinicians following varied practices. Therefore, an expert consensus-based practical recommendation for local ablation was developed by a group of experts in radiology and hepatology from the Research Committee of the Korean Liver Cancer Association in collaboration with the Korean Society of Image-guided Tumor Ablation to provide useful information and guidance for performing local ablation and for the pre- and post-treatment management of patients.

Local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2024 expert consensus-based practical recommendation of the Korean Liver Cancer Association

Local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a non-surgical option that directly targets and destroys tumor cells, has advanced significantly since the 1990s. Therapies with different energy sources, such as radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation, employ different mechanisms to induce tumor necrosis. The precision, safety, and effectiveness of these therapies have increased with advances in guiding technologies and device improvements. Consequently, local ablation has become the firstline treatment for early-stage HCC. The lack of organized evidence and expert opinions regarding patient selection, pre-procedure preparation, procedural methods, swift post-treatment evaluation, and follow-up has resulted in clinicians following varied practices. Therefore, an expert consensus-based practical recommendation for local ablation was developed by a group of experts in radiology and hepatology from the Research Committee of the Korean Liver Cancer Association in collaboration with the Korean Society of Image-guided Tumor Ablation to provide useful information and guidance for performing local ablation and for the pre- and posttreatment management of patients.

Safety and feasibility of percutaneous abdominal lavage cytology screening (PACS) prior to surgical resection for pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, diagnostic yield, and technical aspects of percutaneous abdominal lavage cytology screening (PACS) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent PACS before pancreatectomy between May 2022 and October 2023. The technical success rate, position of the drainage tube, volume of fluid administered, volume of fluid retrieved, fluid retrieval rate, and adverse events were evaluated. The cytological results of PACS were compared with those of surgical peritoneal lavage performed during pancreatectomy.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study. The technical success rate for PACS was 100%. Drainage tube placement was outside the pouch of Douglas in all patients in the right-sided abdominal approach group (n = 10), whereas the placement was in the pouch of Douglas in all patients in the suprapubic approach group (n = 34). The mean volume of fluid administered, mean volume of fluid retrieved, and fluid retrieval rate were 185.0 ± 22.9 ml vs. 97.1 ± 32.0 ml (p < 0.001), 36.8 ± 25.6 ml vs. 50.5 ± 21.6 ml (p = 0.059), and 19.0 ± 12.4% vs. 54.9 ± 21.9% (p < 0.001) in the right abdominal approach and suprapubic approach groups, respectively. No adverse events were reported. The cytological results were benign in 42 patients; no discrepancy was observed in the results of surgical peritoneal lavage (n = 36).

CONCLUSION

PACS is a feasible and safe procedure that can be performed before pancreatectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. the suprapubic approach may be ideal and PACS could be a screening method to detect carcinomatous peritonitis.

Artificial ascites‑assisted microwave ablation for liver cancer adjacent to the diaphragm and perioperative nursing care

Liver cancer near the deep diaphragm can be difficult to visualize due to the effects of lung gas, which presents a challenge for microwave ablation (MWA). The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of artificial ascites-assisted MWA for treating liver cancer near the deep diaphragm, as well as the significance of perioperative nursing. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent artificial ascites-assisted MWA for liver cancer located near the deep diaphragm between January 2016 and December 2022. Normal saline was utilized as artificial ascites to safeguard the deep diaphragm during MWA. The study recorded the procedural success rate, incidence of major complications, technical efficacy of ablation and local tumor progression (LTP). A total of 62 lesions in 54 patients were included, with 44 men and 10 women, and a mean (± SD) age of 55.64±10.33 years. The ultrasound image quality scores for liver cancer before and after ascites were 3.57±0.79 and 4.89±0.33, respectively, showing a statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=16.324; P<0.05). No diaphragm injury, skin burns at the puncture site or abdominal hemorrhage occurred during the procedure. A single patient developed right-sided pleural effusion, which did not require drainage. The complete ablation rate was 94.4% (51/54) at 1 month post-ablation, with 3 patients experiencing recurrence and receiving additional MWA treatment. The median follow-up time for the patients in this study was 21 months (range, 12-45 months), with a LTP rate of 5.6% (3/54). In conclusion, MWA assisted by artificial ascites is a safe and effective treatment for liver cancer near the deep diaphragm. Furthermore, perioperative treatment and rehabilitation of the patients with high-quality nursing is beneficial.

Combined multiple regional anesthesia for microwave ablation of liver Tumors: Initial experience

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of combined multiple regional anesthesia (CMRA) as a potential strategy to decrease pain and reliance on intravenous analgesics during and after ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (US-guided-MWA) of liver tumors.

METHODS

A cohort of 75 patients with a total of 99 liver tumors who underwent US-guided-MWA of liver tumors were enrolled. These patients were randomly allocated into three groups: A, B, and C. Prior to the ablation procedure, Group A patients received a combination of hepatic hilar block (HHB), Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), and local anesthesia (LA). Patients in Group B were administered HHB in conjunction with LA, while those in Group C received TAPB and LA. Evaluative parameters included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores, consumption of morphine, incidence of complications, and factors influencing perioperative pain.

RESULTS

All patients successfully underwent US-guided-MWA. The peak NRS scores for pain during ablation across the three groups were 2.36 ± 1.19, 3.28 ± 1.59, and 4.24 ± 1.42 respectively (P < 0.01), while the count of patients requiring morphine were 4/25, 8/25, and 13/25 respectively (P < 0.01). Postoperative NRS scores for the three groups at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36-hour intervals demonstrated a pattern of initial increase followed by a decrease, with the order at each interval being: Group A < Group C < Group B. Factors associated with increased pain included larger tumor size, greater number of tumors, and longer procedure and ablation time (P < 0.05). No major complications were recorded across the three groups.

CONCLUSION

CMRA offers an effective and safe modality to manage pain during and after US-guided-MWA of liver tumors.

Application and evaluation of hydrodissection in microwave ablation of liver tumours in difficult locations

Objective

To investigate the safety and mid-term outcomes of hydrodissection-assisted microwave ablation (MWA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in various difficult locations.

Methods

A total of 131 HCC patients who underwent ultrasound-guided MWA from March 2017 to March 2019 were included. Following ultrasound examination, patients with tumors at difficult locations were treated with hydrodissection-assisted MWA (hydrodissection group), while those with tumors at conventional locations received MWA (control group). Both groups were compared concerning baseline characteristics, ablation parameters, complete ablation rates, and complication rates. Kaplan-Meier curves analyzed local tumor progression and overall survival, with stratified analysis for different difficult locations (adjacent to gastrointestinal tract, diaphragm, and subcapsular tumors). Additionally, Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of different difficult locations on these outcomes.

Results

Complete ablation rates were similar between the hydrodissection and control groups (91.4% vs. 95.2%, P>0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in three patients, including liver abscess and biliary injury. No significant differences in major or minor complication rates were found between the groups (P>0.05). Local tumor progression was detected in 11 patients (8.4%) at the end of the follow-up period. Neither cumulative local tumor progression rate (P=0.757) nor overall survival rate (P=0.468) differed significantly between the groups. Stratified analysis showed no effect of tumor location difficulty on cumulative local tumor progression or overall survival. Tumor number and size served as independent predictors for overall survival, while minimal ablation margin ≤ 5mm independently predicted local tumor progression. In contrast, the tumor location was not statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses corroborated the robustness of the models.

Conclusion

Hydrodissection-assisted MWA for HCC in various difficult locations demonstrated safe and effective, with complete ablation and mid-term outcomes comparable to those for tumors in conventional locations.

No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2023 Korean Society of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation Guidelines

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been widely used to manage hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) equal to or smaller than 3 cm. No-touch RFA has gained attention and has recently been implemented in local ablation therapy for HCCs, despite its technical complexity, as it provides improved local tumor control compared to conventional tumor-puncturing RFA. This article presents the practice guidelines for performing no-touch RFA for HCCs, which have been endorsed by the Korean Society of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation (KSITA). The guidelines are primarily designed to assist interventional oncologists and address the limitations of conventional tumor-puncturing RFA with describing the fundamental principles, various energy delivery methods, and clinical outcomes of no-touch RFA. The clinical outcomes include technical feasibility, local tumor progression rates, survival outcomes, and potential complications.

Perithyroidal hemorrhage caused by hydrodissection during radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Hydrodissection is a widely used technique during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for benign thyroid nodules. Although it could effectively avoid thermal injury to the surrounding critical structures and achieve complete treatment, routine operation of the remaining needle could cause perithyroidal hemorrhage. In this report, we present 2 cases of perithyroidal hemorrhage during RFA caused by a hydrodissection needle, which have not been reported before.

CASE SUMMARY

A 21-year-old female and a 45-year-old male were admitted for RFA for benign thyroid nodules. Considering that their nodules were adjacent to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, the needle used for hydrodissection was placed and remained between the dorsal capsule of the lateral lobe and the recurrent laryngeal nerve. During the procedure, active bleeding near the needle appeared on ultrasonography (US). Although moderate pressure was quickly applied to the neck for several minutes, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) still showed an active hemorrhage. A radiofrequency electrode was placed at the bleeding point under the guidance of CEUS to stop the bleeding, and the procedure was finally confirmed to be successful by CEUS, without other complications.

CONCLUSION

Hydrodissection during RFA of benign thyroid nodules was associated with a risk of perithyroidal hemorrhage. The timely recognition of this acute hemorrhage could help in the timely control of the bleeding, and CEUS-guided ablation of the bleeding point could be useful.

Comparison of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Subcapsular and Non-Subcapsular Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for subcapsular colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLMs).

Materials and Methods

With the approval of the Institutional Review Board, the clinical data of CLM patients who underwent percutaneous RFA for the first time from August 2010 to August 2020 were continuously collected. All CLMs were divided into subcapsular and non-capsular groups. Baseline characteristic data, technical effectiveness, minimal ablative margin, complications, local tumor progression (LTP), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups were analyzed using the t-test or chi-square test. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic factors of LTP.

Results

One hundred and ninety-nine patients (124 males; mean age, 60.2 years) with 402 CLMs (221 subcapsular; mean size, 16.0 mm) were enrolled in the study. Technical effectiveness was achieved in 93.5% (376/402) of CLMs, with a major complication rate of 5.5%. Compared with non-subcapsular tumors, the minimal ablative margin achieved in subcapsular CLM was smaller (χ² = -8.047, P < 0.001). With a median follow-up time of 23 months (range, 3−96 months), 37.1% of the tumors had LTP. The estimated cumulative OS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 96.1%, 66.0%, and 44.2%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of technical effectiveness (χ² = 0.484, P = 0.487), major complications (χ² = 0.082, P = 0.775), local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) (χ² = 0.881, P = 0.348), and OS (χ² = 2.874, P = 0.090). Minimal ablative margin, tumor size (≥20 mm), and technical effectiveness were predictors of LTP (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

RFA is a safe and effective technique for local tumor control of subcapsular CLMs.