Electromagnetic Navigation System-Guided Microwave Ablation of Hepatic Tumors: A Matched Cohort Study

Clinical application of optical and electromagnetic navigation system in CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of lung metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical value of CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary metastases under optical and electromagnetic navigation.

METHODS

Data on CT-guided radiofrequency ablation treatment of 93 metastatic lung lesions in 70 patients were retrospectively analyzed. There were 46 males and 24 females with a median age of 60.0 years (16-85 years). All lesions were ≤3cm in diameter. 57 patients were treated with 17 G radiofrequency ablation needle puncture directly ablated the lesion without biopsy, and 13 patients were treated with 16 G coaxial needle biopsy followed by radiofrequency ablation. There were 25 cases in the optical navigation group, 25 in the electromagnetic navigation group, and 20 in the non-navigation group. The navigation group was performed by primary interventionalists with less than 5 years of experience, and the non-navigation group was performed by interventionalists with more than 5 years of experience.

RESULT

All operations were successfully performed. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall distribution of follow-up results among the optical, electromagnetic, and no navigation groups. Complete ablation was achieved in 84 lesions (90.3%). 7 lesions showed incomplete ablation and were completely inactivated after repeat ablation. 2 lesions progressed locally, and one of them still had an increasing trend after repeat ablation. No serious complications occurred after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with optical and electromagnetic navigation systems by less experienced operators has similar outcomes to traditional treatments without navigational systems performed by more experienced operators.

CT Navigation for Percutaneous Needle Placement: How I Do It

CT navigation (CTN) has recently been developed to combine many of the advantages of conventional CT and CT-fluoroscopic guidance for needle placement. CTN systems display real-time needle position superimposed on a CT dataset. This is accomplished by placing electromagnetic (EM) or optical transmitters/sensors on the patient and needle, combined with fiducials placed within the scan field to superimpose a known needle location onto a CT dataset. Advantages of CTN include real-time needle tracking using a contemporaneous CT dataset with the patient in the treatment position, reduced radiation to the physician, facilitation of procedures outside the gantry plane, fewer helical scans during needle placement, and needle guidance based on diagnostic-quality CT datasets. Limitations include the display of a virtual (vs actual) needle position, which can be inaccurate if the needle bends, the fiducial moves, or patient movement occurs between scans, and limitations in anatomical regions with a high degree of motion such as the lung bases. This review summarizes recently introduced CTN technologies in comparison to historical methods of CT needle guidance. A "How I do it" section follows, which describes how CT navigation has been integrated into the study center for both routine and challenging procedures, and includes step-by-step explanations, technical tips, and pitfalls.

Percutaneous CT-Guided Abdominal and Pelvic Biopsies: Comparison of an Electromagnetic Navigation System and CT Fluoroscopy

PURPOSE

To compare electromagnetic navigation (EMN) with computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy for guiding percutaneous biopsies in the abdomen and pelvis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective matched-cohort design was used to compare biopsies in the abdomen and pelvis performed with EMN (consecutive cases, n = 50; CT-Navigation; Imactis, Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France) with those performed with CT fluoroscopy (n = 100). Cases were matched 1:2 (EMN:CT fluoroscopy) for target organ and lesion size (±10 mm).

RESULTS

The population was well-matched (age, 65 vs 65 years; target size, 2.0 vs 2.1 cm; skin-to-target distance, 11.4 vs 10.7 cm; P > .05, EMN vs CT fluoroscopy, respectively). Technical success (98% vs 100%), diagnostic yield (98% vs 95%), adverse events (2% vs 5%), and procedure time (33 minutes vs 31 minutes) were not statistically different (P > .05). Operator radiation dose was less with EMN than with CT fluoroscopy (0.04 vs 1.2 μGy; P < .001), but patient dose was greater (30.1 vs 9.6 mSv; P < .001) owing to more helical scans during EMN guidance (3.9 vs 2.1; P < .001). CT fluoroscopy was performed with a mean of 29.7 tap scans per case. In 3 (3%) cases, CT fluoroscopy was performed with gantry tilt, and the mean angle out of plane for EMN cases was 13.4°.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous biopsies guided by EMN and CT fluoroscopy were closely matched for technical success, diagnostic yield, procedure time, and adverse events in a matched cohort of patients. EMN cases were more likely to be performed outside of the gantry plane. Radiation dose to the operator was higher with CT fluoroscopy, and patient radiation dose was higher with EMN. Further study with a wider array of procedures and anatomic locations is warranted.

Improving puncture accuracy in percutaneous CT-guided needle insertion with wireless inertial measurement unit: a phantom study

OBJECTIVES

A novel method applying inertial measurement units (IMUs) was developed to assist CT-guided puncture, which enables real-time displays of planned and actual needle trajectories. The method was compared with freehand and laser protractor-assisted methods.

METHODS

The phantom study was performed by three operators with 8, 2, and 0 years of experience in CT-guided procedure conducted five consecutive needle placements for three target groups using three methods (freehand, laser protractor-assisted, or IMU-assisted method). The endpoints included mediolateral angle error and caudocranial angle error of the first pass, the procedure time, the total number of needle passes, and the radiation dose.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the number of needle passes (IMU 1.2 ± 0.42, laser protractor 2.9 ± 1.6, freehand 3.6 ± 2.0 time, p < 0.001), the procedure time (IMU 3.0 ± 1.2, laser protractor 6.4 ± 2.9, freehand 6.2 ± 3.1 min, p < 0.001), the mediolateral angle error of the first pass (IMU 1.4 ± 1.2, laser protractor 1.6 ± 1.3, freehand 3.7 ± 2.5 degree, p < 0.001), the caudocranial angle error of the first pass (IMU 1.2 ± 1.2, laser protractor 5.3 ± 4.7, freehand 3.9 ± 3.1 degree, p < 0.001), and the radiation dose (IMU 250.5 ± 74.1, laser protractor 484.6 ± 260.2, freehand 561.4 ± 339.8 mGy-cm, p < 0.001) among three CT-guided needle insertion methods.

CONCLUSION

The wireless IMU improves the angle accuracy and speed of CT-guided needle punctures as compared with laser protractor guidance and freehand techniques.

KEY POINTS

• The IMU-assisted method showed a significant decrease in the number of needle passes (IMU 1.2 ± 0.42, laser protractor 2.9 ± 1.6, freehand 3.6 ± 2.0 time, p < 0.001). • The IMU-assisted method showed a significant decrease in the procedure time (IMU 3.0 ± 1.2, laser protractor 6.4 ± 2.9, freehand 6.2 ± 3.1 min, p < 0.001). • The IMU-assisted method showed a significant decrease in the mediolateral angle error of the first pass and the caudocranial angle error of the first pass.

Evaluation of Accuracy and Performance of a Novel, Fully Gantry Integrated 3D Laser System for Computed Tomography Guided Needle Placement: A Phantom Study

The purpose of this phantom study was to compare the accuracy, speed and technical performance of CT guided needle placement using a conventional technique versus a novel, gantry integrated laser guidance system for both an expert and a novice. A total of 80 needle placements were performed in an abdominal phantom using conventional CT guidance and a laser guidance system. Analysis of pooled results of expert and novice showed a significant reduction of time (277 vs. 204 s, p = 0.001) and of the number of needle corrections (3.28 vs. 1.58, p < 0.001) required when using laser guidance versus conventional technique. No significant improvement in absolute (3.81 vs. 3.41 mm, p = 0.213) or angular deviation (2.85 vs. 2.18°, p = 0.079) was found. With either approach, the expert was significantly faster (conventional guidance: 207 s vs. 346 s, p < 0.001; laser guidance: 144 s vs. 264 s, p < 0.001) and required fewer needle corrections (conventional guidance: 4 vs. 3, p = 0.027; laser guidance: 2 vs. 1, p = 0.001) than the novice. The laser guidance system helped both the expert and the novice to perform CT guided interventions in a phantom faster and with fewer needle corrections compared to the conventional technique, while achieving similar accuracy.

Fully Integrated Laser Guidance for CT-Based Punctures: A Study in Phantoms and Patients

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis of equal or even superior applicability and accuracy of a fully integrated, laser-based computed tomography (CT) navigation system compared with conventional CT guidance for percutaneous interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT-guided punctures were first performed in phantoms. Four radiologists with different experience levels (2 residents (L.B., C.D.) and 2 board-certified radiologists (B.M., K.R.) performed 48 punctures using both conventional image-guided and laser-guided approaches. Subsequently, 12 punctures were performed in patients during a clinical pilot trial. Phantom targets required an in-plane or a single-/double-angulated, out-of-plane approach. Planning and intervention time, control scan number, radiation exposure, and accuracy of needle placement (measured by deviation of the needle tip to the designated target) were assessed for each guidance technique and compared (Mann-Whitney U test and t test). Patient interventions were additionally analyzed for applicability in a clinical setting.

RESULTS

The application of laser guidance software in the phantom study and in 12 human patients in a clinical setting was both technically and clinically feasible in all cases. The mean planning time (P = .009), intervention time (P = .005), control scan number (P < .001), and radiation exposure (P = .013) significantly decreased for laser-navigated punctures compared with those for conventional CT guidance and especially in punctures with out-of-plane-trajectories. The accuracy significantly increased for laser-guided interventions compared with that for conventional CT (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Interventional radiologists with differing levels of experience performed faster and more accurate punctures for out-of-plane trajectories in the phantom models, using a new, fully integrated, laser-guided CT software and demonstrated excellent clinical and technical success in initial clinical experiments.

Evaluation of tissue shrinkage after CT-guided microwave ablation in patients with liver malignancies using Jacobian determinant

PURPOSE

To assess short-term tissue shrinkage in patients with liver malignancies undergoing computed tomography (CT)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) using Jacobian determinant (JD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with 29 hepatic malignancies (primary n = 24; metastases n = 5; median tumor diameter 18 mm) referred to CT-guided MWA (single position; 10 min, 100 W) were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study, after exclusion of five patients. Following segmentation of livers and tumors on pre-interventional images, segmentations were registered on post-interventional images. JD mapping was applied to quantify voxelwise tissue volume changes after MWA. Percentual volume changes were evaluated in the ablated tumor, a 5-cm tumor perimeter and in the whole liver and compared in different clinical conditions (tumor entity: primary vs. secondary; tumor location: subcapsular vs. non-subcapsular; tumor volume: >/<6 ml: cirrhosis: yes vs. no; prior chemotherapy: yes vs. no using Shapiro-Wilk, χ² and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, respectively (with p < 0.05 deemed significant).

RESULTS

Tissue volume change was 0.6% in the ablated tumor, 1.6% in the 5-cm perimeter and 0.3% in the whole liver. Shrinkage in the ablated tumor was pronounced in non-subcapsular located tumors, whereas tissue expansion was noted in subcapsular tumors (median -3.5 vs. 1.1%; p = 0.0195). Shrinkage in the whole liver was higher in tumor volumes >6ml, compared with smaller tumors, in which tissue expansion was noted (median -1.0 vs. 2.5%; p = 0.002). Other clinical conditions had no significant influence on the extent of tissue shrinkage (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

3D Jacobian analysis shows that hepatic tissue deformation following MWA is most pronounced in a 5-cm area surrounding the treated tumor. Tumor location and tumor volume may have an impact on the extent of tissue shrinkage which may affect estimation of the safety margin.

Precision Imaging Guidance in the Era of Precision Oncology: An Update of Imaging Tools for Interventional Procedures

Interventional oncology (IO) procedures have become extremely popular in interventional radiology (IR) and play an essential role in the diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care of oncologic patients through new and safe procedures. IR procedures can be divided into two main groups: vascular and non-vascular. Vascular approaches are mainly based on embolization and concomitant injection of chemotherapeutics directly into the tumor-feeding vessels. Percutaneous approaches are a type of non-vascular procedures and include percutaneous image-guided biopsies and different ablation techniques with radiofrequency, microwaves, cryoablation, and focused ultrasound. The use of these techniques requires precise imaging pretreatment planning and guidance that can be provided through different imaging techniques: ultrasound, computed tomography, cone-beam computed tomography, and magnetic resonance. These imaging modalities can be used alone or in combination, thanks to fusion imaging, to further improve the confidence of the operators and the efficacy and safety of the procedures. This article aims is to provide an overview of the available IO procedures based on clinical imaging guidance to develop a targeted and optimal approach to cancer patients.

Computed Tomography-Navigation™ Electromagnetic System Compared to Conventional Computed Tomography Guidance for Percutaneous Lung Biopsy: A Single-Center Experience

The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of a computed tomography (CT)-Navigation™ electromagnetic system compared to conventional CT methods for percutaneous lung biopsies (PLB). In this single-center retrospective study, data of a CT-Navigation™ system guided PLB (NAV-group) and conventional CT PLB (CT-group) performed between January 2017 and February 2020 were reviewed. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic success. Secondary endpoints were technical success, total procedure duration, number of CT acquisitions and the dose length product (DLP) during step ∆1 (from planning to initial needle placement), step ∆2 (progression to target), and the entire intervention (from planning to final control) and complications. Additional parameters were recorded, such as the lesion’s size and trajectory angles. Sixty patients were included in each group. The lesions median size and median values of the two trajectory angles were significantly lower (20 vs. 29.5 mm, p = 0.006) and higher in the NAV-group (15.5° and 10° vs. 6° and 1°; p < 0.01), respectively. Technical and diagnostic success rates were similar in both groups, respectively 95% and 93.3% in the NAV-group, and 93.3% and 91.6% in the CT-group. There was no significant difference in total procedure duration (p = 0.487) and total number of CT acquisitions (p = 0.066), but the DLP was significantly lower in the NAV-group (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in complication rate. For PLB, CT-Navigation™ system is efficient and safe as compared to the conventional CT method.

Impact of an Augmented Reality Navigation System (SIRIO) on Bone Percutaneous Procedures: A Comparative Analysis with Standard CT-Guided Technique

(1) Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of an augmented reality navigation system (SIRIO) for percutaneous biopsies and ablative treatments on bone lesions, compared to a standard CT-guided technique. (2) Methods: Bioptic and ablative procedures on bone lesions were retrospectively analyzed. All procedures were divided into SIRIO and Non-SIRIO groups and in <2 cm and >2 cm groups. Number of CT-scans, procedural time and patient’s radiation dose were reported for each group. Diagnostic accuracy was obtained for bioptic procedures. (3) Results: One-hundred-ninety-three procedures were evaluated: 142 biopsies and 51 ablations. Seventy-four biopsy procedures were performed using SIRIO and 68 under standard CT-guidance; 27 ablative procedures were performed using SIRIO and 24 under standard CT-guidance. A statistically significant reduction in the number of CT-scans, procedural time and radiation dose was observed for percutaneous procedures performed using SIRIO, in both <2 cm and >2 cm groups. The greatest difference in all variables examined was found for procedures performed on lesions <2 cm. Higher diagnostic accuracy was found for all SIRIO-assisted biopsies. No major or minor complications occurred in any procedures. (4) Conclusions: The use of SIRIO significantly reduces the number of CT-scans, procedural time and patient’s radiation dose in CT-guided percutaneous bone procedures, particularly for lesions <2 cm. An improvement in diagnostic accuracy was also achieved in SIRIO-assisted biopsies.