Get Protected! Recommendations for Staff in IR

Intraoperative Ionizing Radiation Exposure Awareness and Associated Morbidity in Neurosurgery: A Nationwide Survey

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgeons often use radiation to visualize blood vessels and implants intraoperatively. However, high exposure to radiation increases one's cancer risk. This study aims to investigate intraoperative ionizing radiation exposure awareness and associated morbidity among neurosurgeons.

METHODS

An anonymized 30-question survey about their intraoperative radiation exposure, protective measures, radiation knowledge, and any conditions that can arise from protracted radiation exposure was disseminated to 3344 American Association of Neurological Surgeons members.

RESULTS

A total of 227 (6.8%) neurosurgeons completed the survey. Most neurosurgeons (61, 27%) performed 2-4 surgeries per week necessitating radiation (61, 27%), did not use a dosimeter (134, 59%), and wore a lead apron (89%) and a thyroid shield (75%). Only 7 (3%) of respondents could correctly identify the safety limit for occupational radiation. One hundred and thirty-four (59%) respondents correctly identified the relationship between distance and radiation dose reduction. Two hundred and thirteen (94%) neurosurgeons reported concern about occupational radiation exposure. No significant association was found between occupational radiation exposure and the rate of cataracts, combined cancer, and skin cancer. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age and cancer history found that the likelihood of developing leukemia (P = 0.02) and nonmalignant thyroid nodular disease (P = 0.01) is positively associated with increased total occupational radiation exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for improved radiation safety awareness among neurosurgeons, especially in the context of rising usage of minimally invasive surgery. This can allow for a greater understanding of radiation-associated risks among neurosurgeons and guide the implementation of safer practices.

Exploring Augmented Reality Integration in Diagnostic Imaging: Myth or Reality?

This study delves into the transformative potential of integrating augmented reality (AR) within imaging technologies, shedding light on this evolving landscape. Through a comprehensive narrative review, this research uncovers a wealth of literature exploring the intersection between AR and medical imaging, highlighting its growing prominence in healthcare. AR's integration offers a host of potential opportunities to enhance surgical precision, bolster patient engagement, and customize medical interventions. Moreover, when combined with technologies like virtual reality (VR), artificial intelligence (AI), and robotics, AR opens up new avenues for innovation in clinical practice, education, and training. However, amidst these promising prospects lie numerous unanswered questions and areas ripe for exploration. This study emphasizes the need for rigorous research to elucidate the clinical efficacy of AR-integrated interventions, optimize surgical workflows, and address technological challenges. As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, sustained research efforts are crucial to fully realizing AR's transformative impact in medical imaging. Systematic reviews on AR in healthcare also overlook regulatory and developmental factors, particularly in regard to medical devices. These include compliance with standards, safety regulations, risk management, clinical validation, and developmental processes. Addressing these aspects will provide a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in integrating AR into clinical settings, informing stakeholders about crucial regulatory and developmental considerations for successful implementation. Moreover, navigating the regulatory approval process requires substantial financial resources and expertise, presenting barriers to entry for smaller innovators. Collaboration across disciplines and concerted efforts to overcome barriers will be essential in navigating this frontier and harnessing the potential of AR to revolutionize healthcare delivery.

Radiation Exposure and Safety Considerations in Interventional Radiology: Comparison of a Twin Robotic X-ray System to a Conventional Angiography System

Background/Objectives: To evaluate radiation exposure in standard interventional radiology procedures using a twin robotic X-ray system compared to a state-of-the-art conventional angiography system. Methods: Standard interventional radiology procedures (port implantation, SIRT, and pelvic angiography) were simulated using an anthropomorphic Alderson RANDO phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories Inc. Stamford, CT, USA) on an above-the-table twin robotic X-ray scanner (Multitom Rax, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) and a conventional below-the-table angiography system (Artis Zeego, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). The phantom's radiation exposure (representing the potential patient on the procedure table) was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters. Height-dependent dose curves were generated for examiners and radiation technologists in representative positions using a RaySafe X2 system (RaySafe, Billdal, Sweden). Results: For all scenarios, the device-specific dose distribution differs depending on the imaging chain, with specific advantages and disadvantages. Radiation exposure for the patient is significantly increased when using the Multitom Rax for pelvic angiography compared to the Artis Zeego, which is evident in the dose progression through the phantom's body as well as in the organ-related radiation exposure. In line with these findings, there is an increased radiation exposure for the performing proceduralist, especially at eye level, which can be significantly minimized by using protective equipment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, the state-of-the-art conventional below-the-table angiography system is associated with lower radiation dose exposures for both the patient and the interventional radiology physician compared to an above-the-table twin robotic X-ray system for pelvic angiographies. However, in other clinical scenarios (port implantation or SIRT), both devices are suitable options with acceptable radiation exposure.

Comparison of the performance of two thermoluminescent dosimetry systems for the personal dose-equivalent Hp(10) measurement

The performance of two thermoluminescent dosimetry systems (RGD-3D and RE2000) manufactured in China and Finland was compared. Both of these dosimetry systems demonstrated satisfactory results as their performance met the requirements of the standard. The two dosimetry systems showed similar performance in the energy response. The RGD-3D dosimetry system performed better in nonlinear response, minimum detectable level and blind sample tests, whereas the RE2000 dosimetry system showed better stability.

A report on a survey among Portuguese Association of Interventional Cardiology associates regarding ionizing radiation protection practices in national interventional cath-labs

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Concerns surrounding the consequences of ionizing radiation (IR) have increased in interventional cardiology (IC). Despite this, the ever-growing complexity of diseases as well as procedures can lead to greater exposure to radiation. The aim of this survey, led by Portuguese Association of Interventional Cardiology (APIC), was to evaluate the level of awareness and current practices on IR protection among its members.

METHODS

An online survey was emailed to all APIC members, between August and November 2021. The questionnaire consisted of 50 questions focusing on knowledge and measures of IR protection in the catheterization laboratory. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

From a response rate of 46.9%, the study obtained a total sample of 159 responses (156 selected for analysis). Most survey respondents (66.0%) were unaware of the radiation exposure category, and only 60.4% reported systematically using a dosimeter. A large majority (90.4%) employed techniques to minimize exposure to radiation. All participants used personal protective equipment, despite eyewear protection only being used frequently by 49.2% of main operators. Ceiling suspended shields and table protectors were often used. Only two-thirds were familiar with the legally established limit on radiation doses for workers or the dose that should trigger patient follow-up. Most of the survey respondents had a non-certified training in IR procedures and only 32.0% had attended their yearly occupational health consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

Safety methods and protective equipment are largely adopted among interventional cardiologists, who have shown some IR awareness. Despite this, there is room for improvement, especially concerning the use of eyewear protection, monitoring, and certification.

Trend and distribution analysis of occupational radiation exposure among medical practices in Chongqing, China (2008-2020)

The personal dose levels of medical radiation workers in Chongqing from 2008 to 2020 were investigated and analysed. The results showed that a total of 68 379 people were monitored from 2008 to 2020. The number of radiation workers increased year by year, and the number of female radiation workers increased rapidly. The monitoring data were analysed by Mann-Whitney test, Mann-Kendall test and Bonferroni method. The annual mean effective dose from 2008 to 2020 showed a decreasing trend (P < 0.0001). At the 5% significance level, six occupational categories showed a significant decreasing trend (P < 0.0001).The average annual effective dose for medical radiation workers in Chongqing in 2020 was 0.4482 mSv and 94.73% of radiation workers received annual doses less than the public dose limit (1 mSv). Personal dose monitoring results for most radiation workers were low. The protection of radiation workers in interventional radiology and nuclear medicine should be concerned.

Comparison of the radiation protection effect of different radiation protection aprons made of different materials

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to examine the performance of new generation protection aprons as alternative to conventional lead aprons regarding their radiation protection effectiveness.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Radiation protection aprons made of lead-containing and lead-free materials from a total of seven companies were compared. Furthermore, different lead equivalent values of 0.25, 0.35 and 0.5 mm were compared. For quantitative assessment, radiation attenuation was determined with increasing voltage in steps of 20 kV from 70 kV up to 130 kV.

RESULTS

New generation aprons and conventional protection lead aprons showed a similar shielding performance at lower tube voltages below 90 kVp. When tube voltage was increased above 90 kVp, significant (p < 0.05) differences between the three apron types were observed, with conventional lead material as best shielding performer over lead composite and lead-free aprons.

CONCLUSION

We observed a similar radiation protection performance between conventional lead aprons and new generation aprons at low intensity radiation workplaces, with lead aprons being dominant for all energies. Only new generation aprons of 0.5 mm thickness would adequately replace 0.25 and 0.35 mm conventional lead aprons. For healthy radiation protection, the possibility of using weight-reduced X-ray aprons is very limited.

Radiation Exposure Reduction by Digital Variance Angiography in Lower Limb Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

digital variance angiography (DVA) provides higher image quality than digital subtraction angiography (DSA). This study investigates whether the quality reserve of DVA allows for radiation dose reduction during lower limb angiography (LLA), and compares the performance of two DVA algorithms.

METHODS

this prospective block-randomized controlled study enrolled 114 peripheral arterial disease patients undergoing LLA into normal dose (ND, 1.2 µGy/frame, n = 57) or low-dose (LD, 0.36 µGy/frame, n = 57) groups. DSA images were generated in both groups, DVA1 and DVA2 images were generated in the LD group. Total and DSA-related radiation dose area product (DAP) were analyzed. Image quality was assessed on a 5-grade Likert scale by six readers.

RESULTS

the total and DSA-related DAP were reduced by 38% and 61% in the LD group. The overall visual evaluation scores (median (IQR)) of LD-DSA (3.50 (1.17)) were significantly lower than the ND-DSA scores (3.83 (1.00), p < 0.001). There was no difference between ND-DSA and LD-DVA1 (3.83 (1.17)), but the LD-DVA2 scores were significantly higher (4.00 (0.83), p < 0.01). The difference between LD-DVA2 and LD-DVA1 was also significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DVA significantly reduced the total and DSA-related radiation dose in LLA, without affecting the image quality. LD-DVA2 images outperformed LD-DVA1, therefore DVA2 might be especially beneficial in lower limb interventions.

Embolization of Ruptured Infratentorial Pial AVM in Pregnancy

A primigravida 22-year-old woman, at a gestation of 23 weeks, experienced bleeding from a pial arteriovenous malformation (AVM) located in the right cerebellum. After interdisciplinary consensus and with the informed consent of the patient and her family, AVM embolization was performed. Complete occlusion of the AVM was achieved by embolization with PHIL (precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid). The calculated dose in the uterus was less than 1 µSv, which represents a negligible risk of harmful effects on the fetus. She delivered a baby at 37 weeks of gestation by cesarean section without complications. No congenital disorders were diagnosed by standard screening methods until the age of the newborn was two years. The angiography protocol must be optimized to minimize the radiation dose. Adequate shielding protection of the uterus is important. Premature termination of pregnancy is not necessary. Multidisciplinary care of neurologists, neurosurgeons, interventional radiologists, anesthesiologists, neonatologists, and obstetricians is necessary.

Occupational and patient doses for interventional radiology integrated into a dose management system

OBJECTIVES

The International Commission on Radiological Protection recommends managing patient and occupational doses as an integrated approach, for the optimisation of interventional procedures. The conventional passive personal dosimeters only allow one to know the accumulated occupational doses during a certain period of time. This information is not enough to identify if there is a lack of occupational radiation protection during some procedures. This paper describes the use of a dose management system (DMS) allowing patient and occupational doses for individual procedures to be audited.

METHODS

The DMS manages patient and occupational doses measured by electronic personal dosimeters. One dosemeter located at the C-arm is used as a reference for scatter radiation. Data have been collected from five interventional rooms. Dosimetry data can be managed for the whole procedure and the different radiation events. Optimisation is done through auditing different sets of parameters for individual procedures: patient dose indicators, occupational dose values, the ratio between occupational doses, and the doses measured by the reference dosemeter at the C-arm, and the ratio between occupational and patient dose values.

RESULTS

The managed data correspond to the year 2021, with around 4500 procedures, and 8000 records on occupational exposures. Patient and staff dose data (for 11 cardiologists, 7 radiologists and 8 nurses) were available for 3043 procedures. The DMS allows alerts for patient dose indicators and occupational exposures to be set.

CONCLUSIONS

The main advantage of this integrated approach is the capacity to improve radiation safety for patients and workers together, auditing alerts for individual procedures.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The management of patient and occupational doses together (measured with electronic personal dosimeters) for individual interventional procedures, using dose management systems, allows alerting optimisation on high-dose values for patients and staff.

Modified design of x-ray protective clothing to enhance radiation protection for interventional radiologists

BACKGROUND

In interventional radiology procedures, the operator typically stands on the right side of the patient's right thigh to manipulate devices through the femoral sheath. Because the standard x-ray protective clothing is designed as sleeveless and scatter radiations from the patient are mainly incident from the left-anterior direction to the operator, the arm hole of the clothing may be a significant unprotected area, contributing to an increase in the operator's organ doses and effective dose.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the organ doses and effective dose received by the interventional radiologist when wearing the standard x-ray protective clothing and when wearing the modified clothing with an additional shoulder guard.

METHODS

The experimental setup aimed to simulate actual clinical practice in interventional radiology. The patient phantom was located at the beam center to generate scatter radiation. An adult female anthropomorphic phantom loaded with 126 nanoDots (Landauer Inc., Glenwood, IL) was used to measure organ and effective doses to the operator. The standard wrap-around type x-ray protective clothing offered 0.25-mm lead-equivalent protection, and the frontal overlap area offered 0.50-mm lead-equivalent protection. The shoulder guard was custom-made with a material providing x-ray protection equivalent to lead of 0.50 mm thickness. The organ and effective doses were compared between the operator wearing the standard protective clothing and the one wearing the modified clothing with a shoulder guard.

RESULTS

After adding the shoulder guard, doses to the lungs, bone marrow, and esophagus decreased by 81.9%, 58.6%, and 58.7%, respectively, and the effective dose to the operator decreased by 47.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Widespread use of modified x-ray protective clothing with shoulder guards can significantly decrease the overall occupational radiation risk in interventional radiology.

An ultra-low-dose protocol for computed tomography-guided lung radiofrequency ablations

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultra-low-dose (ULD) protocol for computed tomography (CT)-guided lung radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Patients who had undergone lung RFA between November 2017 and January 2021 were consecutively and retrospectively included. Thirty patients were treated using a conventional standard protocol (SP), including helical acquisitions with mA automatic adjustment and sequential CT at 80 kVp; and 31, with a ULD protocol defined with helical acquisitions with fixed mA and sequential series at 100 kVp. These parameters were selected from those used for a diagnostic lung low-dose CT scanner. Patient characteristics, dose indicators, technical efficacy (minimal margin [MM], recurrence during follow-up), and complications (pneumothorax, alveolar haemorrhage, and haemoptysis) were recorded. We included 61 patients (median age, 65 [54-73] and 33 women), with no significant differences according to the type of protocol, except for the type of anaesthesia. Even if the number of helical acquisitions did not significantly change, all dose indicators significantly decreased by 1.5-fold-3-fold. The median dose-length-product and effective dose, with their ranges, respectively, were 465 mGy cm (315-554) and 6.5 mSv (4.4-7.8) in the SP group versus 178 mGy cm (154-267) and 2.5 mSv (2.2-3.7) in the ULD group, (p< 001). The ULD group exhibited lower intraoperator variability and better interoperator alignment than those of the SP group. The MM was not significantly different between the two groups (4.6 mm versus 5 mm,p= 16). One local recurrence was observed in each group at 8 months in the SP and at one year in the ULD group (p= 1). The complication rates did not differ significantly. Implementing an ULD protocol during lung RFA may provide similar efficacy, a reduction of dose indicators, and intra- and interoperator variability, without increasing complication rates, compared to those associated with an SP.

What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Protection against occupational radiation exposure in clinical settings is important. This paper clarifies the present status of medical occupational exposure protection and possible additional safety measures. Radiation injuries, such as cataracts, have been reported in physicians and staff who perform interventional radiology (IVR), thus, it is important that they use shielding devices (e.g., lead glasses and ceiling-suspended shields). Currently, there is no single perfect radiation shield; combinations of radiation shields are required. Radiological medical workers must be appropriately educated in terms of reducing radiation exposure among both patients and staff. They also need to be aware of the various methods available for estimating/reducing patient dose and occupational exposure. When the optimizing the dose to the patient, such as eliminating a patient dose that is higher than necessary, is applied, exposure of radiological medical workers also decreases without any loss of diagnostic benefit. Thus, decreasing the patient dose also reduces occupational exposure. We propose a novel four-point policy for protecting medical staff from radiation: patient dose Optimization, Distance, Shielding, and Time (pdO-DST). Patient dose optimization means that the patient never receives a higher dose than is necessary, which also reduces the dose received by the staff. The patient dose must be optimized: shielding is critical, but it is only one component of protection from radiation used in medical procedures. Here, we review the radiation protection/reduction basics for radiological medical workers, especially for IVR staff.

Clinical application of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion guided only by transesophageal echocardiography without fluoroscopy and angiography in the patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The objective of this study was to understand the clinical efficacy and application of the percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (PLAAO) guided only by the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), without using the fluoroscopy and angiography.

METHODS

During the time period of this study from June 2020 to June 2021, 32 patients underwent PLAAO and all underwent a TEE guided approach. The anatomical features of the left atrial appendage (LAA) were evaluated and observed by TEE before and during the procedure. LAA occluder device was selected for the appropriate size. Intraoperative TEE guided and monitored the process of PLAAO in real-time, and also evaluated the stability and tightness of the occluder device, following monitored postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The PLAAO procedure was successful in all the patients. No serious complications like dislocation of the occluder and embolism were seen. Postoperative TEE demonstrated that the PLAAO occluder devices were in a good position without residual shunting.

CONCLUSIONS

PLAAO only guided by TEE may become a safe and reliable surgical procedure, which can protect surgeons and patients from radiation, and can gradually become a novel surgical method of PLAAO with the practical application value.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Interventional Radiology Practice Worldwide: Results from a Global Survey

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic had an unprecedented impact on clinical practice and healthcare professionals. We aimed to assess how interventional radiology services (IR services) were impacted by the pandemic and describe adaptations to services and working patterns across the first two waves.

Methods

An anonymous six-part survey created using an online service was distributed as a single-use web link to 7125 members of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe via email. Out of 450 respondents, 327 who completed the survey at least partially including 278 who completed the full survey were included into the analysis.

Results

Interventional radiologists (IRs) reported that the overall workload decreased a lot (18%) or mildly (36%) or remained stable (29%), and research activities were often delayed (30% in most/all projects, 33% in some projects). Extreme concerns about the health of families, patients and general public were reported by 43%, 34% and 40%, respectively, and 29% reported having experienced significant stress (25% quite a bit; 23% somewhat). Compared to the first wave, significant differences were seen regarding changes to working patterns, effect on emergency work, outpatient and day-case services in the second wave. A total of 59% of respondents felt that their organisation was better prepared for a third wave. A total of 19% and 39% reported that the changes implemented would be continued or potentially continued on a long-term basis.

Conclusion

While the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected IR services in terms of workload, research activity and emotional burden, IRs seem to have improved the own perception of adaptation and preparation for further waves of the pandemic.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00270-022-03090-6.