1
|
Soomro FH, Osman HA, Haridi M, Gonzalez NA, Dayo SM, Fatima U, Sheikh A, Puvvada CS, Yu AK. Drug-Eluting Bead, Irinotecan (DEBIRI) Therapy for Refractory Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e50072. [PMID: 38186525 PMCID: PMC10769813 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer and related mortality present a profound challenge in its management, even in this modern age. Even today, colorectal cancer-related deaths rank third in the world. Despite having multiple lines of chemotherapy, combined with radiotherapy and chemoembolization techniques, after or before surgical resection, the five-year survival rate is approximately 20%. Drug-eluting bead, irinotecan (DEBIRI) is a new technique that involves embolization of the feeding vessels to the tumour and delivering irinotecan for its chemotherapeutic effects. A significant amount of literature compares DEBIRI as an adjunct to various lines of chemotherapy. However, so far, not much data are available on DEBIRI as a singular treatment for those patients who have had multiple chemotherapies and still progressing and are not fit for liver resection. In this systematic review, we aim to highlight and bring together the results of those studies that focused on this specific patient group. A systematic search of the literature involving three large databases (published between January 2017 and July 2022), excluding languages other than English, was conducted to identify articles documenting patients who had disease progression despite chemotherapy and were not fit for surgical resection. The level of evidence and the quality check were assessed by two independent reviewers, and consensus with the senior author resolved disagreements. Out of seven studies that met the final criteria, we found a pooled cohort of 302 patients. The mean age of the patients was 61.2 years, ranging from 40.7 to 84 years. The most commonly used DEBIRI beads were M1 (70-150 um) and M2 (100-300 um), but two studies reported the use of 40 um as well. The total number of DEBIRI treatments performed in our pooled cohort was 904. The majority of the studies reported only G1/G2 toxicities among the patients, with maximal toxicity of G4 in a few selected patients. The median overall survival in our pooled cohort was 19.52 months. The median progression-free survival in our data was 5.76 months. Our systematic review concludes that DEBIRI is undoubtedly a useful treatment modality with an acceptable toxicity profile. This treatment offers a good overall survival benefit for refractory colorectal liver metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiza H Soomro
- General Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
- General Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, GBR
| | - Hafsa A Osman
- Pediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Merna Haridi
- Medical Education, St. Martinus University, Willemstad, CUW
- Medical Education, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Natalie A Gonzalez
- Pediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Sana M Dayo
- Public Health Sciences, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, PAK
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Umaima Fatima
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Aaiyat Sheikh
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
- Internal Medicine, Era's Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, IND
| | - Chaitanya S Puvvada
- General Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
- General Surgery, Gayatri Vidya Parishad Institute of Health Care and Medical Technology, Visakhapatnam, IND
| | - Ann Kashmer Yu
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malagari K, Kiakidis T, Moschouris H, Charokopakis A, Vergadis C, Alevisopoulos N, Kartsouni V, Panagiotou I, Pellerin O, Glantzounis G, Filippiadis DK, Emmanouil E, Tsavaris N, Psarros G, Delicha E, Kelekis N. Prospective Series of Transarterial Chemoembolization of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver with 30-60 μm Microspheres Loaded with Irinotecan. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00270-023-03446-6. [PMID: 37337059 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03446-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe safety and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to the liver treated with transarterial chemoembolization with HepaSphere™ Microspheres 30-60 μm loaded with irinotecan (ΙRI-HEP-TACE). MATERIAL AND METHODS In this prospective study (NCT04866290), 100 adults with confirmed mCRC to the liver who were ineligible for resection were enrolled and followed up to 24 months or death. Study outcomes among Salvage (patients not tolerating more cycles of chemotherapy) and Non-salvage patients included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response (OR), objective response rate (ORR), best tumor response (BTR), adverse events (AEs), and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN38). RESULTS The median age was 66 years (range: 31-89). Median OS was 15.08 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.33-17.25). PFS was 8.52 months (95% CI: 6.0-9.0; p < 0.001). ORR was 42.2% (95% CI: 31.57-53.50) and 35.9% (95% CI: 25.57-47.62) based on modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) and RECIST 1.1 criteria. BTR was not significantly different between mRECIST and RECIST (p = 0.745). The Non-salvage group had a statistically significant difference in median OS relative to the Salvage group (15.3 vs. 3 months; p < 0.001). Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated no correlation of OS with plasma concentration of irinotecan and SN38 (all p > 0.05). Most AEs were Grade 2 (257/279), the most common AE was right upper abdominal pain (180/279). One major AE (tumor rupture) was reported. CONCLUSION IRI-HEP-TACE is an alternative treatment for patients with Non-salvage mCRC to the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Malagari
- Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 19 Monis Kyccou, 15 669 Papagou, Athens, Greece.
- Evgenidion and Attikon University Hospitals, Chaidari, Greece.
| | - Th Kiakidis
- Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 19 Monis Kyccou, 15 669 Papagou, Athens, Greece
- Evgenidion and Attikon University Hospitals, Chaidari, Greece
| | - H Moschouris
- Interventional Radiology Department, Tzanion General Hospital, Piraeus, Athens, Greece
| | - A Charokopakis
- Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 19 Monis Kyccou, 15 669 Papagou, Athens, Greece
- Evgenidion and Attikon University Hospitals, Chaidari, Greece
| | | | | | - V Kartsouni
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Agios Savvas Anticancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ir Panagiotou
- Department of Internal Medicine, Agios Savvas Anticancer Hospital, Αthens, Greece
| | - O Pellerin
- Interventional Radiology, Université de Paris-Citè, PARCC, INSERM, 75006, Service de Radiologie Interventionnelle Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | | - D K Filippiadis
- Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 19 Monis Kyccou, 15 669 Papagou, Athens, Greece
- Evgenidion and Attikon University Hospitals, Chaidari, Greece
| | - E Emmanouil
- Department of Radiology, Amalia Fleming Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - G Psarros
- ASTAT-Statistics in Clinical Research, 166 75, Athens, Greece
| | - E Delicha
- ASTAT-Statistics in Clinical Research, 166 75, Athens, Greece
| | - N Kelekis
- Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 19 Monis Kyccou, 15 669 Papagou, Athens, Greece
- Evgenidion and Attikon University Hospitals, Chaidari, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hsu TF, Chang WC, Chang PY, Lin HH, Chen PK, Ko KH, Chiu SH. Drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan to treat synchronous liver-only metastases of colorectal cancer non-responsive to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220767. [PMID: 36802795 PMCID: PMC10161911 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with synchronous liver-only metastases non-responsive to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy (BBC). METHODS Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. Treatment response to BBC and DEBIRI were determined by the morphological criteria and Choi's criteria, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. The correlation between pre-DEBIRI CT parameters and treatment response to DEBIRI was analyzed. RESULTS CRC patients were divided into the BBC responsive group (R group) (n = 16) and the non-responsive group (n = 42), which was further divided into the NR group (23 patients who did not receive DEBIRI) and the NR+DEBIRI group (19 patients who received DEBIRI after failing BBC). Among the R, NR and NR+DEBIRI groups, the median PFS were 11, 12, and 4 months, respectively (p < 0.01); median OS were 36, 23, and 12 months, respectively (p = 0.01). In the NR+DEBIRI group, 33 metastatic lesions were treated with DEBIRI, of which 18 (54.5%) reached objective response. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the contrast enhancement ratio (CER) before DEBIRI could predict objective response (AUC = 0.737, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION In CRC patients, DEBIRI can achieve acceptable objective response for liver metastases non-responsive to BBC. However, this locoregional control does not prolong survival. The pre-DEBIRI CER can predict OR in these patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DEBIRI can act as an acceptable locoregional management in CRC patients with liver metastases non-responsive to BBC, and the pre-DEBIRI CER is a potential indicator of locoregional control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Fu Hsu
- Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chou Chang
- Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ping-Ying Chang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsuan-Hwai Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pin-Ko Chen
- Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Hsiang Ko
- Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sung-Hua Chiu
- Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Safety, Feasibility and Technical Considerations from a Prospective, Observational Study-CIREL: Irinotecan-TACE for CRLM in 152 Patients. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11206178. [PMID: 36294499 PMCID: PMC9604674 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
CIREL, a prospective, Europe-wide, observational study aimed to assess the real-world feasibility and tolerability of irinotecan-based transarterial chemoembolization (LP-irinotecan TACE) for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases with regard to the treatment plan and adverse events (AEs). CIREL enrolled 152 eligible patients (≥18 years) with liver-only or dominant metastases treated with LP-irinotecan TACE following a multidisciplinary tumor board decision. Data were prospectively collected for baseline, the number of planned and performed sessions, and technical information and safety according to CTCAE 4.03/5.0. Results from 351 analyzed treatment sessions showed technical success for 99% of sessions, and 121 patients (79%) completed all planned sessions. Further, 60% of sessions were performed using opioids, 4% intra-arterial anesthetics, and 25% both. Additionally, 60% of patients experienced at least one peri-interventional AE of any grade; 8% of grade 3−4. Occurrence of AEs was related to larger liver-involvement (p < 0.001), bi-lobar disease (p = 0.002), and larger beads (p < 0.001). Using corticosteroids together with antiemetics showed reduced and lower grade vomiting (p = 0.01). LP-irinotecan TACE was tolerated well and had a high proportion of completed treatment plans. This minimally invasive locoregional treatment can be used together with concomitant systemic therapy or ablation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Solbiati LA, Arai Y. Interventional oncology of liver tumors: how it all started and where are we now. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20220434. [PMID: 35776630 PMCID: PMC9815741 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver was the very first organ for which interventional procedures were applied for the local treatment of primary and secondary malignancies. In this paper, the history of Interventional Oncology of liver, from the very beginning to the current situation, is summarized, including both percutaneous and intravascular procedures, and together with the evolution of the techniques for image guidance. The main ongoing developments, such as new techniques, combined interventional treatments and association of local interventions with new drugs are briefly described, too.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yasuaki Arai
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shi Q, Wang F, Du N, Zhou Y, Zhou X, Ma J, Yang M, Zhang Z, Yu J, Zhang W, Luo J, Liu L, Yan Z. Microwave ablation combined with lipiodol-microsphere mixed or conventional transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases: A retrospective study. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2022; 46:101986. [PMID: 35772684 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2022.101986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the clinical outcomes of microwave ablation (MWA) combined with lipiodol-microsphere mixed transarterial chemoembolization (mTACE) or conventional TACE (cTACE) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study evaluated the medical records of patients with CRLM who underwent MWA combined with mTACE or cTACE from January 2018 to September 2021. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated during the follow-up. In addition, prognostic factors affecting survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS A total of 79 patients with CRLM were enrolled in the study (MWA-mTACE group, n = 38; MWA-cTACE group, n = 41). The patients who underwent MWA-mTACE had higher DCR (86.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.029) and better PFS (median, 8.1 vs. 5.5 months, P = 0.018) than those who underwent MWA-cTACE, but no significant difference was found in ORR (34.2% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.225) and OS (median, 15.7 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.231). Further univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that MWA-mTACE was an independent positive factor for PFS, and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen level was a hazard factor for OS. The postoperative laboratory tests and complications in patients who underwent MWA-mTACE were similar to those who underwent MWA-cTACE. CONCLUSION Lipiodol-microsphere mixed TACE might be an effective and safe treatment to combine with microwave ablation for patients with colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin Shi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Feihang Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Nan Du
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yongjie Zhou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xin Zhou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jingqin Ma
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Minjie Yang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Zihan Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jiaze Yu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Wen Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jianjun Luo
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Lingxiao Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Zhiping Yan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institution of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|