1
|
Suydam CR, Schlussel AT. Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:619-629. [PMID: 38677825 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
The management of oligometastatic colorectal cancer differs from the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, and it is essential that those who treat oligometastatic disease be familiar with the treatment options for these patients. Although definitive treatment is often surgical, there are situations where local therapies such as SBRT or ablative techniques may better serve the patient. Adjuvant therapy should be provided to all patients, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered as well. The role of immunotherapy is currently limited due to the lack of clinical trials in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille R Suydam
- Department of General Surgery, 300 East Hospital Road, Fort Eisenhower, GA 30905, USA.
| | - Andrew T Schlussel
- Department of Surgery, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, 950 15th Street, Augusta, GA 30901, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Montalti R, Cassese G, Zidan A, Rompianesi G, Cesare Giglio M, Campanile S, Arena L, Maione M, Troisi RI. Local recurrence risk factors and outcomes in minimally invasive thermal ablation for liver tumors: a single-institution analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:682-690. [PMID: 38342647 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally Invasive thermal ablation (MITA) of liver tumors is a commonly performed procedure, alone or in combination with liver resection. Despite being a first-option strategy for small lesions, it is technically demanding, and many concerns still exist about local disease control. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing MITA from 1-2019 to 12-2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Risk factors of local recurrence were investigated through univariate and multivariable cox regression analysis. RESULTS At the multivariable analysis of the 207 nodules undergoing MITA, RFA was associated with worse local Recurrence Free Survival (lRFS) than MWA (HR 2.87 [95 % CI 0.96-8.66], p = 0.05), as well as a concomitant surgical resection (HR 3.89 [95 % CI 1.06-9.77], p = 0.02). A concomitant surgical resection showed worse lRFS in the subgroup analysis of both HCC (HR 3.98 [95 % CI 1.16-13.62], p = 0.02) and CRLM patients (HR 2.68 [95 % CI 0.66-5.92], p = 0.04). Interestingly, a tumor size between 30 and 40 mm was not associated to worse lRFS. CONCLUSION MWA may reduce the risk of local recurrence in comparison to RFA, while MITA associated to liver resection may face an increased risk of local recurrence. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm such results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Montalti
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy; Department of Public Health, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Cassese
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
| | - Ahmed Zidan
- Department of Surgery, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Gianluca Rompianesi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Mariano Cesare Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Silvia Campanile
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Lorenza Arena
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hitchcock KE, Miller ED, Shi Q, Dixon JG, Gholami S, White SB, Wu C, Goulet CC, George M, Jee KW, Wright CL, Yaeger R, Shergill A, Hong TS, George TJ, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Romesser PB. Alliance for clinical trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: a pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur). BMC Cancer 2024; 24:201. [PMID: 38350888 PMCID: PMC10863118 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11899-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with liver-confined metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), local therapy of isolated metastases has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS). However, for patients with more advanced mCRC, including those with extrahepatic disease, the efficacy of local therapy is less clear although increasingly being used in clinical practice. Prospective studies to clarify the role of metastatic-directed therapies in patients with mCRC are needed. METHODS The Evaluating Radiation, Ablation, and Surgery (ERASur) A022101/NRG-GI009 trial is a randomized, National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase III study evaluating if the addition of metastatic-directed therapy to standard of care systemic therapy improves OS in patients with newly diagnosed limited mCRC. Eligible patients require a pathologic diagnosis of CRC, have BRAF wild-type and microsatellite stable disease, and have 4 or fewer sites of metastatic disease identified on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted. All metastatic lesions must be amenable to total ablative therapy (TAT), which includes surgical resection, microwave ablation, and/or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with SABR required for at least one lesion. Patients without overt disease progression after 16-26 weeks of first-line systemic therapy will be randomized 1:1 to continuation of systemic therapy with or without TAT. The trial activated through the Cancer Trials Support Unit on January 10, 2023. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, adverse events profile, and time to local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. This study requires a total of 346 evaluable patients to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect an improvement in OS from a median of 26 months in the control arm to 37 months in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 0.7. The trial uses a group sequential design with two interim analyses for futility. DISCUSSION The ERASur trial employs a pragmatic interventional design to test the efficacy and safety of adding multimodality TAT to standard of care systemic therapy in patients with limited mCRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05673148, registered December 21, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jesse G Dixon
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Manju George
- COLONTOWN/PALTOWN Development Foundation, Crownsville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Rona Yaeger
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ardaman Shergill
- Alliance Protocol Operations Office, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paul B Romesser
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, 10065, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pereira PL, Bale R, Fretland ÅA, Goldberg SN, Helmberger T, Meijerink MR, Orsi F, Stättner S, Vogl T, Kafkoula A, de Jong N, Zeka B, de Baère T. Local Tumour Control Following Microwave Ablation: Protocol for the Prospective Observational CIEMAR Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:121-129. [PMID: 37884801 PMCID: PMC10770225 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03573-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Microwave ablation (MWA) is a treatment modality for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). While potentially curative, more information is needed on factors that contribute to long-term local tumour control. The prospective multicentre observational study CIRSE Emprint Microwave Ablation Registry aims to prospectively collect real-world technical data and clinical outcomes on patients treated with MWA in CRLM. METHODS Eligible patients are adults with up to 9 local treatment naïve CRLM of ≤ 3 cm completely treatable with either MWA alone or MWA with resection and/or radiotherapy within 8 weeks. Data are collected, at baseline, every 3 months until 12 months, and thereafter every 6 months until the end of the study. The primary outcome measure is local tumour control. Secondary outcome measures are overall survival, (hepatic-) disease-free survival, time-to-progression untreatable by ablation, systemic therapy vacation, safety, and quality of life. Covariates related to the primary outcome measure will be assessed using a stratified log-rank test and an univariable Cox proportional hazard regression. A sample size of 500 patients with 750 lesions produces a two-sided 95% confidence interval with a precision equal to 0.057. RESULTS Between September 2019 and December 2022, 500 patients have been enrolled with at least 976 treated tumours. CONCLUSION The prospective observational CIEMAR study will provide valuable insights into the real-world use of MWA, helping in the future patient selection and clarifying factors that may contribute to long-term local tumour control. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03775980.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe L Pereira
- Center of Radiology, Minimally Invasive Therapies and Nuclear Medicine, SLK-Kliniken GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany
- Academic Hospital University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Eberhards-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Danube Private University Krems, Krems a/d Donau, Austria
| | - Reto Bale
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Åsmund Avdem Fretland
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Nahum Goldberg
- Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Minimal-Invasive Therapy, Klinikum Bogenhausen, Englschalkinger Str. 77, 81925, Munich, Germany
| | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Franco Orsi
- Divisione Di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia, Istituto Di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, SKG Kliniken Vöcklabruck and Gmunden, Vöcklabruck, Gmunden, Austria
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Anna Kafkoula
- Clinical Research, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Neutorgasse 9, 1010, Vienna, Austria
| | - Niels de Jong
- Clinical Research, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Neutorgasse 9, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Bleranda Zeka
- Clinical Research, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Neutorgasse 9, 1010, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thierry de Baère
- Departement d'Anesthésie, de Chirurgie, Et de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, 102 Rue Edourad Vaillant, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UFR Médecine Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique BIOTHERIS, INSERM CIC1428, 102 Rue Edourad Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Graaff MR, Klaase JM, den Dulk M, Coolsen MME, Kuhlmann KFD, Verhoef C, Hartgrink HH, Derksen WJM, van den Boezem P, Rijken AM, Gobardhan P, Liem MSL, Leclercq WKG, Marsman HA, van Duijvendijk P, Bosscha K, Elfrink AKE, Manusama ER, Belt EJT, Doornebosch PG, Oosterling SJ, Ruiter SJS, Grünhagen DJ, Burgmans M, Meijerink M, Kok NFM, Swijnenburg RJ. Trends and overall survival after combined liver resection and thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a nationwide population-based propensity score-matched study. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:34-43. [PMID: 37777384 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients, combination of liver resection and ablation permit a more parenchymal-sparing approach. This study assessed trends in use of combined resection and ablation, outcomes, and overall survival (OS). METHODS This population-based study included all CRLM patients who underwent liver resection between 2014 and 2022. To assess OS, data was linked to two databases containing date of death for patients treated between 2014 and 2018. Hospital variation in the use of combined minor liver resection and ablation versus major liver resection alone in patients with 2-3 CRLM and ≤3 cm was assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS This study included 3593 patients, of whom 1336 (37.2%) underwent combined resection and ablation. Combined resection increased from 31.7% in 2014 to 47.9% in 2022. Significant hospital variation (range 5.9-53.8%) was observed in the use of combined minor liver resection and ablation. PSM resulted in 1005 patients in each group. Major morbidity was not different (11.6% vs. 5%, P = 1.00). Liver failure occurred less often after combined resection and ablation (1.9% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.017). Five-year OS rates were not different (39.3% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.145). CONCLUSION Combined resection and ablation should be available and considered as an alternative to resection alone in any patient with multiple metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R de Graaff
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle M E Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter J M Derksen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Peter van Duijvendijk
- Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn and Zutphen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur K E Elfrink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eric R Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Eric J Th Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, Ijsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | | | - Simeon J S Ruiter
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark Burgmans
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Meijerink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hitchcock KE, Miller ED, Shi Q, Dixon JG, Gholami S, White SB, Wu C, Goulet CC, George M, Jee KW, Wright CL, Yaeger R, Shergill A, Hong TS, George TJ, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Romesser PB. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: A pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur). RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3773522. [PMID: 38196590 PMCID: PMC10775493 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3773522/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Background For patients with liver-confined metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), local therapy of isolated metastases has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS). However, for patients with more advanced mCRC, including those with extrahepatic disease, the efficacy of local therapy is less clear although increasingly being used in clinical practice. Prospective studies to clarify the role of metastatic-directed therapies in patients with mCRC are needed. Methods The Evaluating Radiation, Ablation, and Surgery (ERASur) A022101/NRG-GI009 trial is a randomized, National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase III study evaluating if the addition of metastatic-directed therapy to standard of care systemic therapy improves OS in patients with newly diagnosed limited mCRC. Eligible patients require a pathologic diagnosis of CRC, have BRAF wild-type and microsatellite stable disease, and have 4 or fewer sites of metastatic disease identified on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted. All metastatic lesions must be amenable to total ablative therapy (TAT), which includes surgical resection, microwave ablation, and/or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with SABR required for at least one lesion. Patients without overt disease progression after 16-26 weeks of first-line systemic therapy will be randomized 1:1 to continuation of systemic therapy with or without TAT. The trial activated through the Cancer Trials Support Unit on January 10, 2023. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, adverse events profile, and time to local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. This study requires a total of 346 evaluable patients to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect an improvement in OS from a median of 26 months in the control arm to 37 months in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 0.7. The trial uses a group sequential design with two interim analyses for futility. Discussion The ERASur trial employs a pragmatic interventional design to test the efficacy and safety of adding multimodality TAT to standard of care systemic therapy in patients with limited mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chlorogiannis DD, Sotirchos VS, Georgiades C, Filippiadis D, Arellano RS, Gonen M, Makris GC, Garg T, Sofocleous CT. The Importance of Optimal Thermal Ablation Margins in Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 21 Studies. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5806. [PMID: 38136351 PMCID: PMC10741591 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Thermal ablation (TA) can be a comparable alternative to partial hepatectomy for selected cases when eradication of all visible tumor with an ablative margin of greater than 5 mm is achieved. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to encapsulate the current clinical evidence concerning the optimal TA margin for local cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception until 1 May 2023, in accordance with the PRISMA Guidelines. Measure of effect included the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. RESULTS Overall, 21 studies were included, comprising 2005 participants and 2873 ablated CLMs. TA with margins less than 5 mm were associated with a 3.6 times higher risk for LTP (n = 21 studies, RR: 3.60; 95% CI: 2.58-5.03; p-value < 0.001). When margins less than 5 mm were additionally confirmed by using 3D software, a 5.1 times higher risk for LTP (n = 4 studies, RR: 5.10; 95% CI: 1.45-17.90; p-value < 0.001) was recorded. Moreover, a thermal ablation margin of less than 10 mm but over 5 mm remained significantly associated with 3.64 times higher risk for LTP vs. minimal margin larger than 10 mm (n = 7 studies, RR: 3.64; 95% CI: 1.31-10.10; p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis solidifies that a minimal ablation margin over 5 mm is the minimum critical endpoint required, whereas a minimal margin of at least 10 mm yields optimal local tumor control after TA of CLMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vlasios S. Sotirchos
- Weill-Cornell Medical College, Interventional Oncology/Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Christos Georgiades
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “Attikon”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Ronald S. Arellano
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Gregory C. Makris
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St Thomas Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Tushar Garg
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Constantinos T. Sofocleous
- Weill-Cornell Medical College, Interventional Oncology/Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Miller ED, Hitchcock KE, Romesser PB. Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Definitions and Patient Selection for Local Therapies. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:1116-1127. [PMID: 36652155 PMCID: PMC10352468 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00900-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nearly one-third of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) will ultimately develop metastatic disease. While a small percentage of patients can be considered for curative resection, more patients have limited disease that can be considered for local therapy. Challenges remain in defining oligometastatic CRC as well as developing treatment strategies guided by high level evidence. METHODS In this review, we present the challenges in defining oligometastatic CRC and summarize the current literature on treatment and outcomes of local therapy in patients with metastatic CRC. RESULTS For patients with liver- and/or lung-confined CRC metastases, surgical resection is the standard of care given the potential for long-term progression-free and overall survival. For patients with liver- or lung-confined disease not amenable to surgical resection, non-surgical local therapies, such as thermal ablation, hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP), or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), should be considered. For patients with more advanced disease, such as lymph node or bony metastases, the role of metastasis-directed therapy is controversial. Emerging data suggests that SBRT to ablate all metastases can improve progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary management is critical for patients with metastatic CRC due to the complexity of their cases and the nuanced patient, tumor, biological, and anatomical factors that must be weighed when considering local therapy. High-quality prospective randomized data in CRC are needed to further clarify the role of local ablative therapy in patients with unresectable oligometastatic CRC with ongoing studies including the RESOLUTE trial (ACTRN12621001198819) and the upcoming NCTN ERASur trial (NCT05673148).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W. 10Th Ave., Room A209, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| | - Kathryn E Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
White MJ, Jensen EH, Brauer DG. A Review of Resection and Surgical Ablation for Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers. Semin Intervent Radiol 2023; 40:536-543. [PMID: 38274223 PMCID: PMC10807965 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
The surgical management of primary and secondary liver tumors is constantly evolving. Patient selection, particularly with regard to determining resectability, is vital to the success of programs directed toward invasive treatments of liver tumors. Particular attention should be paid toward determining whether patients are best served with surgical resection or ablative therapies. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to provide optimal care to patients with liver malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- McKenzie J. White
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Eric H. Jensen
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David G. Brauer
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hausegger KA. Editors' Medal 2023. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46:1308-1309. [PMID: 37750919 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03555-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus A Hausegger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klagenfurt State Hospital, Klagenfurt, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van der Lei S, Opperman J, Dijkstra M, Kors N, Boon R, van den Bemd BAT, Timmer FEF, Nota IMGC, van den Bergh JE, de Vries JJJ, Scheffer HJ, Geboers B, Neuss T, Schouten E, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Puijk RS, Meijerink MR. The Added Diagnostic Value of Transcatheter CT Hepatic Arteriography for Intraprocedural Detection of Previously Unknown Colorectal Liver Metastases During Percutaneous Ablation and Impact on the Definitive Treatment Plan. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46:1257-1266. [PMID: 37491521 PMCID: PMC10471708 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03508-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assessed the diagnostic value of CT hepatic arteriography (CTHA) for the intraprocedural detection of previously unknown colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and the impact on the definitive treatment plan. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients treated with CTHA-guided percutaneous ablation for CRLM between January 2012 and March 2022 were identified from the Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE). Radiology reports of the ablative procedure and follow-up imaging were reviewed to see if (a) previously unknown CRLM were detected intra-procedurally and if (b) new CRLM, potentially missed on CTHA, appeared within 6 months following the procedure; three abdominal radiologists re-reviewed the baseline CTHA scans of these patients with early recurrence. To ratify immediate ablations of concomitantly detected CRLM, the upper limit of false positives was predefined at 10%. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-two patients were included. With CTHA, a total of 17 additional tumours in 15 patients were diagnosed and treated immediately, two representing disappeared tumours following systemic chemotherapy. Compared to the conventional contrast-enhanced (ce)CT, ceMRI and 18F-FDG PET-CT, adding CTHA was superior for the detection of CRLM (P < .001). Within 12 months of follow-up 121, new CRLM appeared in 49/152 patients (32.2%); retrospective blinded assessment revealed 56 to already be visible on the baseline CTHA scan (46%); four lesions without substrate on follow-up scans were considered false positives (n = 4/60; 7%). Arterial ring enhancement was the most frequently reported imaging characteristic (n = 45/60; 75%). CONCLUSION The subsequent use of CTHA has added value for the detection of previously unknown and vanished CRLM. Taking into account the low number of false positives (7%) and the favourable safety profile of percutaneous ablation, we believe that immediate ablation of typical ring-enhancing supplementary tumours is justified and sufficiently validated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3; individual cross-sectional study with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan van der Lei
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jip Opperman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- NWZ Group, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Madelon Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nikita Kors
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rianne Boon
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bente A T van den Bemd
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Florentine E F Timmer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene M G C Nota
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke E van den Bergh
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J J de Vries
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester J Scheffer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Geboers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Timothy Neuss
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Schouten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert S Puijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- NWZ Group, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dijkstra M, van der Lei S, Puijk RS, Schulz HH, Vos DJW, Timmer FEF, Scheffer HJ, Buffart TE, van den Tol MP, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Swijnenburg RJ, Versteeg KS, Meijerink MR. Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small-Size (0-3 cm) versus Intermediate-Size (3-5 cm) Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results from the Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE). Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4346. [PMID: 37686622 PMCID: PMC10487073 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Thermal ablation is widely recognized as the standard of care for small-size unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). For larger CRLM safety, local control and overall efficacy are not well established and insufficiently validated. The purpose of this comparative series was to analyze outcomes for intermediate-size versus small-size CRLM. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients treated with thermal ablation between December 2000 and November 2021 for small-size and intermediate-size CRLM were included. The primary endpoints were complication rate and local control (LC). Secondary endpoints included local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS In total, 59 patients were included in the intermediate-size (3-5 cm) group and 221 in the small-size (0-3 cm) group. Complications were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.546). No significant difference between the groups was found in an overall comparison of OS (HR 1.339; 95% CI 0.824-2.176; p = 0.239). LTPFS (HR 3.388; p < 0.001) and LC (HR 3.744; p = 0.004) were superior in the small-size group. Nevertheless, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year LC for intermediate-size CRLM was still 93.9%, 85.4%, and 81.5%, and technical efficacy improved over time. CONCLUSIONS Thermal ablation for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM is safe and induces long-term LC in the vast majority. The results of the COLLISION-XL trial (unresectable colorectal liver metastases: stereotactic body radiotherapy versus microwave ablation-a phase II randomized controlled trial for CRLM 3-5 cm) are required to provide further clarification of the role of local ablative methods for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelon Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Susan van der Lei
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Robbert S. Puijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Hannah H. Schulz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Danielle J. W. Vos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Florentine E. F. Timmer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Hester J. Scheffer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke E. Buffart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Birgit I. Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kathelijn S. Versteeg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn R. Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Amygdalos I, Hitpass L, Schmidt F, Josephs G, Bednarsch J, Berres ML, Lüdde T, Olde Damink SWM, Ulmer TF, Neumann UP, Bruners P, Lang SA. Survival after combined resection and ablation is not inferior to that after resection alone, in patients with four or more colorectal liver metastases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:343. [PMID: 37642753 PMCID: PMC10465667 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03082-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are the predominant factor limiting survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Multimodal treatment strategies are frequently necessary to achieve total tumor elimination. This study examines the efficacy of liver resection combined with local ablative therapy in comparison to liver resection only, in the treatment of patients with ≥ 4 CRLM. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany. Patients with ≥ 4 CRLM in preoperative imaging, who underwent curative resection between 2010-2021, were included. Recurrent resections and deaths in the early postoperative phase were excluded. Ablation modalities included radiofrequency or microwave ablation, and irreversible electroporation. Differences in overall- (OS) and recurrence-free-survival (RFS) between patients undergoing combined resection-ablation vs. resection only, were examined. RESULTS Of 178 included patients, 46 (27%) underwent combined resection-ablation and 132 (73%) resection only. Apart from increased rates of adjuvant chemotherapy in the first group (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.014), there were no differences in perioperative systemic therapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test analyses showed no statistically significant differences in median OS (36 months for both, p = 0.638) or RFS (9 months for combined resection-ablation vs. 8 months, p = 0.921). Cox regression analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.891 (p = 0.642) for OS and 0.981 (p = 0.924) for RFS, for patients undergoing resection only. CONCLUSION For patients with ≥ 4 CRLM, combined resection-ablation is a viable option in terms of OS and RFS. Therefore, combined resection-ablation should be considered for complete tumor clearance, in patients with multifocal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iakovos Amygdalos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany.
| | - Lea Hitpass
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Felix Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gerrit Josephs
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jan Bednarsch
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Marie-Luise Berres
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Florian Ulmer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philipp Bruners
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Sven Arke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vulasala SSR, Sutphin PD, Kethu S, Onteddu NK, Kalva SP. Interventional radiological therapies in colorectal hepatic metastases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:963966. [PMID: 37324012 PMCID: PMC10266282 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.963966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal malignancy is the third most common cancer and one of the prevalent causes of death globally. Around 20-25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 50-60% of patients develop metastases in due course of the disease. Liver, followed by lung and lymph nodes, are the most common sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In such patients, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 19.2%. Although surgical resection is the primary mode of managing colorectal cancer metastases, only 10-25% of patients are competent for curative therapy. Hepatic insufficiency may be the aftermath of extensive surgical hepatectomy. Hence formal assessment of future liver remnant volume (FLR) is imperative prior to surgery to prevent hepatic failure. The evolution of minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques has enhanced the treatment algorithm of patients with colorectal cancer metastases. Studies have demonstrated that these techniques may address the limitations of curative resection, such as insufficient FLR, bi-lobar disease, and patients at higher risk for surgery. This review focuses on curative and palliative role through procedures including portal vein embolization, radioembolization, and ablation. Alongside, we deliberate various studies on conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads. The radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres has evolved as salvage therapy in surgically unresectable and chemo-resistant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Swarupa R. Vulasala
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Patrick D. Sutphin
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Samira Kethu
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States
| | - Nirmal K. Onteddu
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Flowers Hospital, Dothan, AL, United States
| | - Sanjeeva P. Kalva
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shahveranova A, Balli HT, Aikimbaev K, Piskin FC, Sozutok S, Yucel SP. Prediction of Local Tumor Progression After Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Carcinoma Liver Metastases Patients by MRI Radiomics and Clinical Characteristics-Based Combined Model: Preliminary Results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00270-023-03454-6. [PMID: 37156944 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03454-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the predictability of local tumor progression (LTP) after microwave ablation (MWA) in colorectal carcinoma liver metastases (CRLM) patients by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics and clinical characteristics-based combined model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-two consecutive CRLM patients (67 tumors) with post-MWA complete response at 1st month MRI were included in this retrospective study. One hundred and eleven radiomics features were extracted for each tumor and for each phase by manual segmentation from pre-treatment MRI T2 fat-suppressed (Phase 2) and early arterial phase T1 fat-suppressed sequences (Phase 1). A clinical model was constructed using clinical data, two combined models were created with feature reduction and machine learning by combining clinical data and Phase 2 and Phase 1 radiomics features. The predicting performance for LTP development was investigated. RESULTS LTP developed in 7 patients (16.6%) and 11 tumors (16.4%). In the clinical model, the presence of extrahepatic metastases before MWA was associated with a high probability of LTP (p < 0.001). The pre-treatment levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen were higher in the LTP group (p = 0.010, p = 0.020, respectively). Patients with LTP had statistically significantly higher radiomics scores in both phases (p < 0.001 for Phase 2 and p = 0.001 for Phase 1). The classification performance of the combined model 2, created by using clinical data and Phase 2-based radiomics features, achieved the highest discriminative performance in predicting LTP (p = 0,014; the area under curve (AUC) value 0.981 (95% CI 0.948-0.990). The combined model 1, created using clinical data and Phase 1-based radiomics features (AUC value 0,927 (95% CI 0.860-0.993, p < 0.001)) and the clinical model alone [AUC value of 0.887 (95% CI 0.807-0.967, p < 0.001)] had similar performance. CONCLUSION Combined models based on clinical data and radiomics features obtained from T2 fat-suppressed and early arterial-phase T1 fat-suppressed MRI are valuable markers in predicting LTP after MWA in CRLM patients. Large-scale studies with internal and external validations are needed to come to a firm conclusion on the predictability of radiomics models in CRLM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arzu Shahveranova
- Radiology Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Balcali Campus, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Tugsan Balli
- Radiology Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Balcali Campus, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey
| | - Kairgeldy Aikimbaev
- Radiology Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Balcali Campus, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey.
| | - Ferhat Can Piskin
- Radiology Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Balcali Campus, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey
| | - Sinan Sozutok
- Radiology Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Balcali Campus, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey
| | - Sevinc Puren Yucel
- Biostatistics Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Carconi C, Cerreti M, Roberto M, Arrivi G, D'Ambrosio G, De Felice F, Di Civita MA, Iafrate F, Lucatelli P, Magliocca FM, Picchetto A, Picone V, Catalano C, Cortesi E, Tombolini V, Mazzuca F, Tomao S. The Management of Oligometastatic Disease in Colorectal Cancer: Present Strategies and Future Perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 186:103990. [PMID: 37061075 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Oligometastatic disease has been described as an intermediate clinical state between localized cancer and systemically metastasized disease. Recent clinical studies have shown prolonged survival when aggressive locoregional approaches are added to systemic therapies in patients with oligometastases. The aim of this review is to outline the newest options to treat oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), also considering its molecular patterns. We present an overview of the available local treatment strategies, including surgical procedures, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), thermal ablation, as well as trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Moreover, since imaging methods provide crucial information for the early diagnosis and management of oligometastatic CRC, we discuss the role of modern radiologic techniques in selecting patients that are amenable to potentially curative locoregional treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catia Carconi
- Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Micaela Cerreti
- Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Roberto
- UOC Oncologia A, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
| | - Giulia Arrivi
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giancarlo D'Ambrosio
- Department of General Surgery, Surgical Specialties and Organ Transplantation, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Alberto Di Civita
- UOC Oncologia A, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Iafrate
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierleone Lucatelli
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Massimo Magliocca
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Picchetto
- Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picone
- UOC Oncologia B, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- UOC Oncologia B, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Mazzuca
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Predictive Factors for Local Recurrence after Intraoperative Microwave Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010122. [PMID: 36612119 PMCID: PMC9817841 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to clarify local recurrence (LR) predictive factors following intraoperative microwave ablation (MWA) for colorectal liver metastases. The data from 195 patients with 1392 CRLM lesions, who were preoperatively diagnosed by gadolinium-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic CT and treated with intraoperative MWA (2450 MHz) with or without hepatectomy, from January 2005 to December 2019, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using logistic regression. In addition, the margins were measured on contrast-enhanced CT 6 weeks post-ablation. Overall, 1066 lesions were ablated. The LRs occurred in 44 lesions (4.1%) among 39 patients (20.0%). The multivariate analysis per patient showed that tumor size > 20 mm and ablation margin < 5 mm were significant predictors for LR. Furthermore, multivariate analysis per lesion revealed that segments 1, 7, and 8 and tumor size > 15 mm, ablation margin < 5 mm, tumor size > 20 mm, and proximity to the Glisson were significant LR predictors. Finally, the outcome of this study may help determine indications for MWA.
Collapse
|
18
|
Role of Transhepatic Arterial Radioembolization in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1579-1589. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03268-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
19
|
Thermal Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: The Time has Come. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1090-1091. [PMID: 35761091 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03198-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|