1
|
Filipe WF, Buisman FE, Franssen S, Krul MF, Grünhagen DJ, Bennink RJ, Bolhuis K, Bruijnen RCG, Buffart TE, Burgmans MC, van Delden OM, Doornebosch PG, Gobardhan PD, Graven L, de Groot JWB, Grootscholten C, Hagendoorn J, Harmsen P, Homs MYV, Klompenhouwer EG, Kok NFM, Lam MGEH, Loosveld OJL, Meier MAJ, Mieog JSD, Oostdijk AHJ, Outmani L, Patijn GA, Pool S, Rietbergen DDD, Roodhart JML, Speetjens FM, Swijnenburg RJ, Versleijen MWJ, Verhoef C, Kuhlmann KFD, Moelker A, Groot Koerkamp B. Extrahepatic perfusion and incomplete hepatic perfusion after hepatic arterial infusion pump implantation: incidence and clinical implications. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)01231-0. [PMID: 38604828 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.03.1158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study investigates the incidence of extrahepatic perfusion and incomplete hepatic perfusion at intraoperative methylene blue testing and on postoperative nuclear imaging in patients undergoing hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy. METHODS The first 150 consecutive patients who underwent pump implantation in the Netherlands were included. All patients underwent surgical pump implantation with the catheter in the gastroduodenal artery. All patients underwent intraoperative methylene blue testing and postoperative nuclear imaging (99mTc-Macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT) to determine perfusion via the pump. RESULTS Patients were included between January-2018 and December-2021 across eight centers. During methylene blue testing, 29.3% had extrahepatic perfusion, all successfully managed intraoperatively. On nuclear imaging, no clinically relevant extrahepatic perfusion was detected (0%, 95%CI: 0.0-2.5%). During methylene blue testing, 2.0% had unresolved incomplete hepatic perfusion. On postoperative nuclear imaging, 8.1% had incomplete hepatic perfusion, leading to embolization in only 1.3%. CONCLUSION Methylene blue testing during pump placement for intra-arterial chemotherapy identified extrahepatic perfusion in 29.3% of patients, but could be resolved intraoperatively in all patients. Postoperative nuclear imaging found no clinically relevant extrahepatic perfusion and led to embolization in only 1.3% of patients. The role of routine nuclear imaging after HAIP implantation should be studied in a larger cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wills F Filipe
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Florian E Buisman
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn Franssen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Myrtle F Krul
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roel J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Tineke E Buffart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | | | - Laura Graven
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Cecile Grootscholten
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Harmsen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Olaf J L Loosveld
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Mark A J Meier
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ad H J Oostdijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Loubna Outmani
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Pool
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Daphne D D Rietbergen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanine M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank M Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michelle W J Versleijen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Graaff MR, Klaase JM, den Dulk M, Coolsen MME, Kuhlmann KFD, Verhoef C, Hartgrink HH, Derksen WJM, van den Boezem P, Rijken AM, Gobardhan P, Liem MSL, Leclercq WKG, Marsman HA, van Duijvendijk P, Bosscha K, Elfrink AKE, Manusama ER, Belt EJT, Doornebosch PG, Oosterling SJ, Ruiter SJS, Grünhagen DJ, Burgmans M, Meijerink M, Kok NFM, Swijnenburg RJ. Trends and overall survival after combined liver resection and thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a nationwide population-based propensity score-matched study. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:34-43. [PMID: 37777384 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients, combination of liver resection and ablation permit a more parenchymal-sparing approach. This study assessed trends in use of combined resection and ablation, outcomes, and overall survival (OS). METHODS This population-based study included all CRLM patients who underwent liver resection between 2014 and 2022. To assess OS, data was linked to two databases containing date of death for patients treated between 2014 and 2018. Hospital variation in the use of combined minor liver resection and ablation versus major liver resection alone in patients with 2-3 CRLM and ≤3 cm was assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS This study included 3593 patients, of whom 1336 (37.2%) underwent combined resection and ablation. Combined resection increased from 31.7% in 2014 to 47.9% in 2022. Significant hospital variation (range 5.9-53.8%) was observed in the use of combined minor liver resection and ablation. PSM resulted in 1005 patients in each group. Major morbidity was not different (11.6% vs. 5%, P = 1.00). Liver failure occurred less often after combined resection and ablation (1.9% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.017). Five-year OS rates were not different (39.3% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.145). CONCLUSION Combined resection and ablation should be available and considered as an alternative to resection alone in any patient with multiple metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R de Graaff
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle M E Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter J M Derksen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Peter van Duijvendijk
- Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn and Zutphen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur K E Elfrink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eric R Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Eric J Th Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, Ijsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | | | - Simeon J S Ruiter
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark Burgmans
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Meijerink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vietsch EE, Latifi D, Verheij M, van der Oost EW, de Wilde RF, Haen R, van den Boom AL, Koerkamp BG, Doornebosch PG, van Verschuer VM, Ooms AH, Mohammad F, Willemsen M, Aerts JG, Krog RT, de Miranda NF, van den Bosch TP, Mueller YM, Katsikis PD, van Eijck CH. B cell immune profiles in dysbiotic vermiform appendixes of pancreatic cancer patients. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1230306. [PMID: 38022530 PMCID: PMC10667699 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1230306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest solid tumors and is resistant to immunotherapy. B cells play an essential role in PDAC progression and immune responses, both locally and systemically. Moreover, increasing evidence suggests that microbial compositions inside the tumor, as well as in the oral cavity and the gut, are important factors in shaping the PDAC immune landscape. However, the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) has not previously been explored in PDAC patients. In this study, we analyzed healthy vermiform appendix (VA) from 20 patients with PDAC and 32 patients with colon diseases by gene expression immune profiling, flow cytometry analysis, and microbiome sequencing. We show that the VA GALT of PDAC patients exhibits markers of increased inflammation and cytotoxic cell activity. In contrast, B cell function is decreased in PDAC VA GALT based on gene expression profiling; B cells express significantly fewer MHC class II surface receptors, whereas plasma cells express the immune checkpoint molecule HLA-G. Additionally, the vermiform appendix microbiome of PDAC patients is enriched with Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Adlercreutzia equolifaciens, while certain commensals are depleted. Our findings may suggest impaired B cell function within the GALT of PDAC patients, which could potentially be linked to microbial dysbiosis. Additional investigations are imperative to validate our observations and explore these potential targets of future therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline E. Vietsch
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Diba Latifi
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maaike Verheij
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Roel Haen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne Loes van den Boom
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ariadne H.A.G. Ooms
- Department of Pathology, Pathan BV, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Farzana Mohammad
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marcella Willemsen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joachim G.J.V. Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ricki T. Krog
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Yvonne M. Mueller
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter D. Katsikis
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Voigt KR, Wullaert L, Höppener DJ, Schreinemakers JMJ, Doornebosch PG, Verseveld M, Peeters K, Verhoef C, Husson O, Grünhagen D. Patient-led home-based follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer: the protocol of the prospective, multicentre FUTURE-primary implementation study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074089. [PMID: 37827744 PMCID: PMC10582858 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer in the Netherlands. Approximately 90% of patients can be treated with surgery, which is considered potentially curative. Postoperative surveillance during the first 5 years after surgery pursues to detect metastases in an early, asymptomatic and treatable stage. Multiple large randomised controlled trials have failed to show any (cancer-specific) survival benefit of intensive postoperative surveillance compared with a minimalistic approach in patients with CRC. This raises the question whether an (intensive) in-hospital postoperative surveillance strategy is still warranted from both a patient well-being and societal perspective. A more modern, home-based surveillance strategy could be beneficial in terms of patients' quality of life and healthcare costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The multicentre, prospective FUTURE-primary study implements a patient-led home-based surveillance after curative CRC treatment. Here, patients are involved in the choice regarding three fundamental aspects of their postoperative surveillance. First regarding frequency, patients can opt for additional follow-up moments to the minimal requirement as outlined by the current Dutch national guidelines. Second regarding the setting, both in-hospital or predominantly home-based options are available. And third, concerning patient-doctor communication choices ranging from in-person to video chat, and even silent check-ups. The aim of the FUTURE-primary study is to evaluate if such a patient-led home-based follow-up approach is successful in terms of quality of life, satisfaction and anxiety compared with historic data. A successful implementation of the patient-led aspect will be assessed by the degree in which the additional, optional follow-up moments are actually utilised. Secondary objectives are to evaluate quality of life, anxiety, fear of cancer recurrence and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was given by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands (2021-0499). Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05656326.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Raquel Voigt
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lissa Wullaert
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik J Höppener
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Verseveld
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Husson
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dekkers N, Dang H, Vork K, Langers AMJ, van der Kraan J, Westerterp M, Peeters KCMJ, Holman FA, Koch AD, de Graaf W, Didden P, Moons LMG, Doornebosch PG, Hardwick JCH, Boonstra JJ. Outcome of Completion Surgery after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4490. [PMID: 37760458 PMCID: PMC10526268 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
T1 colorectal cancers (T1CRC) are increasingly being treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). After ESD of a T1CRC, completion surgery is indicated in a subgroup of patients. Currently, the influence of ESD on surgical morbidity and mortality is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare 90-day morbidity and mortality of completion surgery after ESD to primary surgery. The completion surgery group consisted of suspected T1CRC patients from a multicenter prospective ESD database (2014-2020). The primary surgery group consisted of pT1CRC patients from a nationwide surgical registry (2017-2019). Patients with rectal or sigmoidal cancers were selected. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Propensity score adjustment was used to correct for confounders. In total, 411 patients were included: 54 in the completion surgery group (39 pT1, 15 pT2) and 357 in the primary surgery group with pT1CRC. Adverse event rate was 24.1% after completion surgery and 21.3% after primary surgery. After completion surgery 90-day mortality did not occur, though one patient died in the primary surgery group. After propensity score adjustment, lymph node yield did not differ significantly between the groups. Among other morbidity-related outcomes, stoma rate (OR 1.298 95%-CI 0.587-2.872, p = 0.519) and adverse event rate (OR 1.162; 95%-CI 0.570-2.370, p = 0.679) also did not differ significantly. A subgroup analysis was performed in patients undergoing rectal surgery. In this subgroup (37 completion and 136 primary surgery), these morbidity outcomes also did not differ significantly. In conclusion, this study suggests that ESD does not compromise morbidity or 90-day mortality of completion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nik Dekkers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Katinka Vork
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Alexandra M. J. Langers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Jolein van der Kraan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Marinke Westerterp
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2512 VA The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Koen C. M. J. Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fabian A. Holman
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D. Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilmar de Graaf
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M. G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal G. Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, 2906 ZC Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - James C. H. Hardwick
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Jurjen J. Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
IJzerman NS, Filipe WF, Bruijn PD, Buisman FE, Doorn LV, Doornebosch PG, Holster JJ, Grootscholten C, Grünhagen DJ, van Bommel CPE, Homs MYV, Kok NFM, Verhoef C, Koerkamp BG, Kuhlmann KFD, Mathijssen RHJ, Koolen SLW. Systemic exposure of floxuridine after hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy with floxuridine in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. Biomed Pharmacother 2023; 162:114625. [PMID: 37058821 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Floxuridine's high hepatic extraction ratio and short elimination half-life allows maximum liver exposure with minimal systemic side-effects. This study attempts to quantify the systemic exposure of floxuridine. METHODS Patients undergoing continuous hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) floxuridine after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in two centres underwent six cycles of floxuridine at start dose 0.12 mg/kg/day. No concomitant systemic chemotherapy was administered. Peripheral venous blood samples were drawn during the first two cycles: pre-dose (only in the second cycle), 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 7 h, and 15 days after floxuridine infusion. Foxuridine concentration in the residual pump reservoir was measured on day 15 of both cycles. A floxuridine assay with a lower boundary of detection of 0.250 ng/mL was developed. RESULTS 265 blood samples were collected in the 25 patient included in this study. Floxuridine was mostly measurable at day 7 and day 15 (86 % and 88 % of patients respectively). The median dose corrected concentrations were 0.607 ng/mL [IQR: 0.472-0.747] for cycle 1 day 7, 0.579 ng/mL [IQR: 0.470-0.693] for cycle 1 day 15, 0.646 ng/mL [IQR: 0.463-0.8546] for cycle 2 day 7, and 0.534 ng/mL [IQR: 0.4257-0.7075] for cycle 2 day 15. One patient had remarkably high floxuridine concentrations reaching up to 44 ng/mL during the second cycle, without a clear explanation. The floxuridine concentration in the pump decreased by 14.7 % (range 0.5 %-37.8 %) over a period of 15 days (n = 18). CONCLUSION Overall, negligible systemic concentrations of floxuridine were detected. However, remarkably increased levels were detected in one patient. Floxuridine concentration in the pump decreases over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki S IJzerman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wills F Filipe
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter de Bruijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Florian E Buisman
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leni van Doorn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - Jessica J Holster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cecile Grootscholten
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marjolein Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dekkers N, Dang H, van der Kraan J, le Cessie S, Oldenburg PP, Schoones JW, Langers AMJ, van Leerdam ME, van Hooft JE, Backes Y, Levic K, Meining A, Saracco GM, Holman FA, Peeters KCMJ, Moons LMG, Doornebosch PG, Hardwick JCH, Boonstra JJ. Risk of recurrence after local resection of T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis with meta-regression. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:9156-9168. [PMID: 35773606 PMCID: PMC9652303 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09396-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND T1 rectal cancer (RC) patients are increasingly being treated by local resection alone but uniform surveillance strategies thereafter are lacking. To determine whether different local resection techniques influence the risk of recurrence and cancer-related mortality, a meta-analysis was performed. METHODS A systematic search was conducted for T1RC patients treated with local surgical resection. The primary outcome was the risk of RC recurrence and RC-related mortality. Pooled estimates were calculated using mixed-effect logistic regression. We also systematically searched and evaluated endoscopically treated T1RC patients in a similar manner. RESULTS In 2585 unique T1RC patients (86 studies) undergoing local surgical resection, the overall pooled cumulative incidence of recurrence was 9.1% (302 events, 95% CI 7.3-11.4%; I2 = 68.3%). In meta-regression, the recurrence risk was associated with histological risk status (p < 0.005; low-risk 6.6%, 95% CI 4.4-9.7% vs. high-risk 28.2%, 95% CI 19-39.7%) and local surgical resection technique (p < 0.005; TEM/TAMIS 7.7%, 95% CI 5.3-11.0% vs. other local surgical excisions 10.8%, 95% CI 6.7-16.8%). In 641 unique T1RC patients treated with flexible endoscopic excision (16 studies), the risk of recurrence (7.7%, 95% CI 5.2-11.2%), cancer-related mortality (2.3%, 95% CI 1.1-4.9), and cancer-related mortality among patients with recurrence (30.0%, 95% CI 14.7-49.4%) were comparable to outcomes after TEM/TAMIS (risk of recurrence 7.7%, 95% CI 5.3-11.0%, cancer-related mortality 2.8%, 95% CI 1.2-6.2% and among patients with recurrence 35.6%, 95% CI 21.9-51.2%). CONCLUSIONS Patients with T1 rectal cancer may have a significantly lower recurrence risk after TEM/TAMIS compared to other local surgical resection techniques. After TEM/TAMIS and endoscopic resection the recurrence risk, cancer-related mortality and cancer-related mortality among patients with recurrence were comparable. Recurrence was mainly dependent on histological risk status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nik Dekkers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jolein van der Kraan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia le Cessie
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Philip P Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy (Formerly: Walaeus Library), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra M J Langers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Katarina Levic
- Gastrounit-Surgical Division, Center for Surgical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alexander Meining
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Giorgio M Saracco
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabian A Holman
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle Aan Den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - James C H Hardwick
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rakké YS, Campos Carrascosa L, van Beek AA, de Ruiter V, van Gemerden RS, Doukas M, Doornebosch PG, Vermaas M, ter Borg S, van der Harst E, Coene PPL, Kliffen M, Grünhagen DJ, Verhoef C, IJzermans JN, Kwekkeboom J, Sprengers D. GITR Ligation Improves Anti-PD1-Mediated Restoration of Human MMR-Proficient Colorectal Carcinoma Tumor-Derived T Cells. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 15:77-97. [PMID: 36155259 PMCID: PMC9672455 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS In contrast to mismatch repair deficient colorectal carcinoma (CRC), MMR proficient (pMMR) CRC does not respond to immune checkpoint blockade. We studied immune checkpoint stimulation via glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein (GITR) on ex vivo functionality of human tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) isolated from pMMR primary CRC and liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS Using lymphocytes from resected tumor, adjacent tissues, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of 132 pMMR primary CRC or CRLM patients, we determined GITR expression and the in vitro T-cell agonistic activity of recombinant GITR ligation. RESULTS Here, we show that GITR was overexpressed on TIL when compared with other stimulatory immune checkpoints (4-1BB, OX40). Its expression was enhanced in TIL compared with PBMC and adjacent tissues. Among CD4+ TIL, GITR expression was primarily expressed by CD45RA- FoxP3hi activated regulatory T cells. Within CD8+ TIL, GITR was predominantly expressed on functionally exhausted and putative tumor-reactive CD103+ CD39+ TIL. Strikingly, recombinant GITRL reinvigorated ex vivo TIL responses by significantly enhancing CD4+ and CD8+ TIL numbers. Dual treatment with GITRL and nivolumab (anti-PD1) enhanced CD8+ TIL expansion compared with GITRL monotherapy. Moreover, GITRL/anti-PD1 dual therapy further improved anti-PD1-mediated reinvigoration of interferon gamma secretion by exhausted CD8 TIL from primary CRC. CONCLUSIONS GITR is overexpressed on CD4+ and CD8+ TIL from pMMR CRC and CRLM. Agonistic targeting of GITR enhances ex vivo human TIL functionality and may therefore be a promising approach for novel monotherapy or combined immunotherapies in primary pMRR CRC and CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick S. Rakké
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucia Campos Carrascosa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A. van Beek
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Valeska de Ruiter
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rachelle S. van Gemerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Mike Kliffen
- Department of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J. Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan N.M. IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap Kwekkeboom
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dave Sprengers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Verseveld M, Verver D, Noordman BJ, Pouwels S, Elferink MAG, de Graaf EJR, Verhoef C, Doornebosch PG, de Wilt JHW. Treatment of clinical T1 rectal cancer in the Netherlands; a population-based overview of clinical practice. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:1153-1160. [PMID: 34799230 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Local excision is increasingly used as an alternative treatment for radical surgery in patients with early stage clinical T1 (cT1) rectal cancer. This study provides an overview of incidence, staging accuracy and treatment strategies in patients with cT1 rectal cancer in the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with cT1 rectal cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2018 were included from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. An overview per time period (2005-2009, 2010-2014 and 2015-2018) of the incidence and various treatment strategies used, e.g. local excision (LE) or major resection, with/without neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), were given and trends over time were analysed using the Chi Square for Trend test. In addition, accuracy of tumour staging was described, compared and analysed over time. RESULTS In total, 3033 patients with cT1 rectal cancer were diagnosed. The incidence of cT1 increased from 540 patients in 2005-2009 to 1643 patients in 2015-2018. There was a significant increased use of LE. In cT1N0/X patients, 9.2% received NAT, 25.5% were treated by total mesorectal excision (TME) and 11.4% received a completion TME (cTME) following prior LE. Overall accuracy in tumour staging (cT1 = pT1) was 77.3%, yet significantly worse in cN1/2 patients, as compared to cN0 patients (44.8% vs 77.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Over time, there was an increase in the incidence of cT1 tumours. Both the use of neoadjuvant therapy and TME surgery in clinically node negative patients decreased significantly. Clinical accuracy in T1 tumour staging improved over time, but remained significantly worse in clinical node positive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Verseveld
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, Schiedam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, division of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - D Verver
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, Schiedam, the Netherlands
| | - B J Noordman
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, Schiedam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, division of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Pouwels
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - M A G Elferink
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - E J R de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, division of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - J H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, division of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu Y, Campos Carrascosa L, Yeung YA, Chu MLH, Yang W, Djuretic I, Pappas DC, Zeytounian J, Ge Z, de Ruiter V, Starbeck-Miller GR, Patterson J, Rigas D, Chen SH, Kraynov E, Boor PP, Noordam L, Doukas M, Tsao D, Ijzermans JN, Guo J, Grünhagen DJ, Erdmann J, Verheij J, van Royen ME, Doornebosch PG, Feldman R, Park T, Mahmoudi S, Dorywalska M, Ni I, Chin SM, Mistry T, Mosyak L, Lin L, Ching KA, Lindquist KC, Ji C, Londono LM, Kuang B, Rickert R, Kwekkeboom J, Sprengers D, Huang TH, Chaparro-Riggers J. An Engineered IL15 Cytokine Mutein Fused to an Anti-PD-1 Improves Intratumoral T-Cell Function and Antitumor Immunity. Cancer Immunol Res 2021; 9:1141-1157. [PMID: 34376502 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-21-0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The use of cytokines for immunotherapy shows clinical efficacy but is frequently accompanied by severe adverse events caused by excessive and systemic immune activation. Here, we set out to address these challenges by engineering a fusion protein of a single, potency-reduced, IL15 mutein and a PD-1-specific antibody (anti-PD1-IL15m). This immunocytokine was designed to deliver PD-1-mediated, avidity-driven IL2/15 receptor stimulation to PD-1+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) while minimally affecting circulating peripheral natural killer (NK) cells and T cells. Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with a mouse cross-reactive fusion, anti-mPD1-IL15m demonstrated potent antitumor efficacy without exacerbating body weight loss in B16 and MC38 syngeneic tumor models. Moreover, anti-mPD1-IL15m was more efficacious than an IL15 superagonist, an anti-mPD-1, or the combination thereof in the B16 melanoma model. Mechanistically, anti-PD1-IL15m preferentially targeted CD8+ TILs and scRNA-seq analyses revealed that anti-mPD1-IL15m treatment induced the expansion of an exhausted CD8+ TILs cluster with high proliferative capacity and effector-like signatures. Antitumor efficacy of anti-mPD1-IL15m was dependent on CD8+ T cells, as depletion of CD8+ cells resulted in the loss of antitumor activity, whereas depletion of NK cells had little impact on efficacy. The impact of anti-hPD1-IL15m on primary human TILs from cancer patients was also evaluated. Anti-hPD1-IL15m robustly enhanced the proliferation, activation, and cytotoxicity of CD8+ and CD4+ TILs from human primary cancers in vitro, whereas tumor-derived regulatory T cells were largely unaffected. Taken together, we showed that anti-PD1-IL15m exhibits a high translational promise with improved efficacy and safety of IL15 for cancer immunotherapy via targeting PD-1+ TILs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Irene Ni
- Oncology Research Unit, Pfizer (United States)
| | | | | | | | | | - Keith A Ching
- Computational Biology/Oncology Research Unit, Pfizer Global R & D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Van Oostendorp SE, Belgers HJ(E, Hol JC, Doornebosch PG, Belt EJT, Oosterling SJ, Kusters M, Bonjer HJ(J, Sietses C, Tuynman JB. The learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is associated with local recurrence: results from a multicentre external audit. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2020-2029. [PMID: 33969621 PMCID: PMC8453958 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has been suggested as a potential solution for the resection of challenging mid and low rectal cancer. This relatively complex procedure has been implemented in many centres over the last years, despite the absence of long-term safety data. Recently, concern has arisen because of an increase in local recurrence in the implementation phase. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between accumulated experience and local recurrences. METHOD An independent clinical researcher performed an external audit of consecutive series of all TaTME procedures in six centres in the Netherlands. Kaplan-Meier estimated local recurrence rates were calculated and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis performed to assess risk factors for local recurrence. Primary outcome was the local recurrence rate in the initial implementation (cases 1-10), continued adoption (cases 11-40) and prolonged experience (case 41 onward). RESULTS Six hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients underwent TaTME for rectal cancer with a median follow-up of 27 months (range 1-82 months). The estimated 2- and 3-year local recurrence rates were 4.6% and 6.6%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression revealed procedural experience to be an independent factor in multivariate analysis next to advanced stage (ycMRF+, pT3-4, pN+) and pelvic sepsis. Corrected analysis projected the 3-year local recurrence rates to be 9.7%, 3.3% and 3.5% for the implementation, continued adoption and prolonged experience cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION This multicentre study shows a high local recurrence rate (12.5%) after implementation of TaTME which lowers to an acceptable rate (3.4%) when experience increases. Therefore, intensified proctoring and further precautions must be implemented to reduce the unacceptably high risk of local recurrence at units starting this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan E. Van Oostendorp
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCVrije Universiteit AmsterdamCancer Centre AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen C. Hol
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCVrije Universiteit AmsterdamCancer Centre AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of SurgeryGelderse Vallei HospitalEdeThe Netherlands
| | | | - Eric J. Th. Belt
- Department of SurgeryAlbert Schweitzer HospitalDordrechtThe Netherlands
| | | | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCVrije Universiteit AmsterdamCancer Centre AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - H. J. (Jaap) Bonjer
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCVrije Universiteit AmsterdamCancer Centre AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Colin Sietses
- Department of SurgeryGelderse Vallei HospitalEdeThe Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B. Tuynman
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMCVrije Universiteit AmsterdamCancer Centre AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Görgec B, Fichtinger RS, Ratti F, Aghayan D, Van der Poel MJ, Al-Jarrah R, Armstrong T, Cipriani F, Fretland ÅA, Suhool A, Bemelmans M, Bosscha K, Braat AE, De Boer MT, Dejong CHC, Doornebosch PG, Draaisma WA, Gerhards MF, Gobardhan PD, Hagendoorn J, Kazemier G, Klaase J, Leclercq WKG, Liem MS, Lips DJ, Marsman HA, Mieog JSD, Molenaar QI, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Nota CL, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Slooter GD, Stommel MWJ, Swijnenburg RJ, Tanis PJ, Te Riele WW, Terkivatan T, Van den Tol PMP, Van den Boezem PB, Van der Hoeven JA, Vermaas M, Edwin B, Aldrighetti LA, Van Dam RM, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG. Comparing practice and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection between high-volume expert centres and nationwide low-to-medium volume centres. Br J Surg 2021; 108:983-990. [PMID: 34195799 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Based on excellent outcomes from high-volume centres, laparoscopic liver resection is increasingly being adopted into nationwide practice which typically includes low-medium volume centres. It is unknown how the use and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection compare between high-volume centres and low-medium volume centres. This study aimed to compare use and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection in three leading European high-volume centres and nationwide practice in the Netherlands. METHOD An international, retrospective multicentre cohort study including data from three European high-volume centres (Oslo, Southampton and Milan) and all 20 centres in the Netherlands performing laparoscopic liver resection (low-medium volume practice) from January 2011 to December 2016. A high-volume centre is defined as a centre performing >50 laparoscopic liver resections per year. Patients were retrospectively stratified into low, moderate- and high-risk Southampton difficulty score groups. RESULTS A total of 2425 patients were included (1540 high-volume; 885 low-medium volume). The median annual proportion of laparoscopic liver resection was 42.9 per cent in high-volume centres and 7.2 per cent in low-medium volume centres. Patients in the high-volume centres had a lower conversion rate (7.4 versus 13.1 per cent; P < 0.001) with less intraoperative incidents (9.3 versus 14.6 per cent; P = 0.002) as compared to low-medium volume centres. Whereas postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar in the two groups, a lower reintervention rate (5.1 versus 7.2 per cent; P = 0.034) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (3 versus 5 days; P < 0.001) were observed in the high-volume centres as compared to the low-medium volume centres. In each Southampton difficulty score group, the conversion rate was lower and hospital stay shorter in high-volume centres. The rate of intraoperative incidents did not differ in the low-risk group, whilst in the moderate-risk and high-risk groups this rate was lower in high-volume centres (absolute difference 6.7 and 14.2 per cent; all P < 0.004). CONCLUSION High-volume expert centres had a sixfold higher use of laparoscopic liver resection, less conversions, and shorter hospital stay, as compared to a nationwide low-medium volume practice. Stratification into Southampton difficulty score risk groups identified some differences but largely outcomes appeared better for high-volume centres in each risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza - Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - R S Fichtinger
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands and RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - F Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - D Aghayan
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - M J Van der Poel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Al-Jarrah
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - T Armstrong
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - F Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Å A Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Suhool
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - M Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands and RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - K Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - A E Braat
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M T De Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - C H C Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands and RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - W A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - M F Gerhards
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M S Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - D J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - H A Marsman
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J S D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Q I Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - C L Nota
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - A M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - G D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - R J Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - T Terkivatan
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P M P Van den Tol
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P B Van den Boezem
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J A Van der Hoeven
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - B Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - L A Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - R M Van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands and RWTH Aachen, Germany.,GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza - Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sharabiany S, Blok RD, Lapid O, Hompes R, Bemelman WA, Alberts VP, Lamme B, Wijsman JH, Tuynman JB, Aalbers AGJ, Beets GL, Fabry HFJ, Cherepanin IM, Polat F, Burger JWA, Rutten HJT, Bosker RJI, Talsma K, Rothbarth J, Verhoef C, van de Ven AWH, van der Bilt JDW, de Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG, Leijtens JWA, Heemskerk J, Singh B, Chaudhri S, Gerhards MF, Karsten TM, de Wilt JHW, Bremers AJA, Vuylsteke RJCLM, Heuff G, van Geloven AAW, Tanis PJ, Musters GD. Perineal wound closure using gluteal turnover flap or primary closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: study protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial (BIOPEX-2 study). BMC Surg 2020; 20:164. [PMID: 32703182 PMCID: PMC7376711 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00823-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer is associated with high morbidity of the perineal wound, and controversy exists about the optimal closure technique. Primary perineal wound closure is still the standard of care in the Netherlands. Biological mesh closure did not improve wound healing in our previous randomised controlled trial (BIOPEX-study). It is suggested, based on meta-analysis of cohort studies, that filling of the perineal defect with well-vascularised tissue improves perineal wound healing. A gluteal turnover flap seems to be a promising method for this purpose, and with the advantage of not having a donor site scar. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a gluteal turnover flap improves the uncomplicated perineal wound healing after APR for rectal cancer. Methods Patients with primary or recurrent rectal cancer who are planned for APR will be considered eligible in this multicentre randomised controlled trial. Exclusion criteria are total exenteration, sacral resection above S4/S5, intersphincteric APR, biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor, collagen disorders, and severe systemic diseases. A total of 160 patients will be randomised between gluteal turnover flap (experimental arm) and primary closure (control arm). The total follow-up duration is 12 months, and outcome assessors and patients will be blinded for type of perineal wound closure. The primary outcome is the percentage of uncomplicated perineal wound healing on day 30, defined as a Southampton wound score of less than two. Secondary outcomes include time to perineal wound closure, incidence of perineal hernia, the number, duration and nature of the complications, re-interventions, quality of life and urogenital function. Discussion The uncomplicated perineal wound healing rate is expected to increase from 65 to 85% by using the gluteal turnover flap. With proven effectiveness, a quick implementation of this relatively simple surgical technique is expected to take place. Trial registration The trial was retrospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04004650 on July 2, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Sharabiany
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Robin D Blok
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,LEXOR, Centre for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Oncode Institute, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oren Lapid
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilhelmus A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Victor P Alberts
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Lamme
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H Wijsman
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans F J Fabry
- Department of Surgery, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | | | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harm J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Koen Talsma
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Rothbarth
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Eelco J R de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen Heemskerk
- Department of Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - Baljit Singh
- Department of Surgery, Leicester Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Tom M Karsten
- Department of Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andre J A Bremers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gijsbert Heuff
- Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gijsbert D Musters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dekkers N, Boonstra JJ, Moons LMG, Hompes R, Bastiaansen BA, Tuynman JB, Koch AD, Weusten BLAM, Pronk A, Neijenhuis PA, Westerterp M, van den Hout WB, Langers AMJ, van der Kraan J, Alkhalaf A, Lai JYL, Ter Borg F, Fabry H, Halet E, Schwartz MP, Nagengast WB, Straathof JWA, Ten Hove RWR, Oterdoom LH, Hoff C, Belt EJT, Zimmerman DDE, Hadithi M, Morreau H, de Cuba EMV, Leijtens JWA, Vasen HFA, van Leerdam ME, de Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG, Hardwick JCH. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:225. [PMID: 32660488 PMCID: PMC7359465 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01367-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the recent years two innovative approaches have become available for minimally invasive en bloc resections of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions (polyps and early cancers). One is Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), the other is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). Both techniques are standard of care, but a direct randomised comparison is lacking. The choice between either of these procedures is dependent on local expertise or availability rather than evidence-based. The European Society for Endoscopy has recommended that a comparison between ESD and local surgical resection is needed to guide decision making for the optimal approach for the removal of large rectal lesions in Western countries. The aim of this study is to directly compare both procedures in a randomised setting with regard to effectiveness, safety and perceived patient burden. METHODS Multicenter randomised trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with non-pedunculated lesions > 2 cm, where the bulk of the lesion is below 15 cm from the anal verge, will be randomised between either a TAMIS or an ESD procedure. Lesions judged to be deeply invasive by an expert panel will be excluded. The primary endpoint is the cumulative local recurrence rate at follow-up rectoscopy at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are: 1) Radical (R0-) resection rate; 2) Perceived burden and quality of life; 3) Cost effectiveness at 12 months; 4) Surgical referral rate at 12 months; 5) Complication rate; 6) Local recurrence rate at 6 months. For this non-inferiority trial, the total sample size of 198 is based on an expected local recurrence rate of 3% in the ESD group, 6% in the TAMIS group and considering a difference of less than 6% to be non-inferior. DISCUSSION This is the first European randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of TAMIS and ESD for the en bloc resection of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions. This is important as the detection rate of these adenomas is expected to further increase with the introduction of colorectal screening programs throughout Europe. This study will therefore support an optimal use of healthcare resources in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register, NL7083 , 06 July 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nik Dekkers
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara A Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Apollo Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marinke Westerterp
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert B van den Hout
- Department of Medical Decision Making & Quality of Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra M J Langers
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jolein van der Kraan
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alaa Alkhalaf
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Isala hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Y L Lai
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Fabry
- Department of Surgery, Bravis Hospital, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Halet
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Bravis Hospital, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Departmet of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Nagengast
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem A Straathof
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier W R Ten Hove
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
| | - Leendert H Oterdoom
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Hagaziekenhuis, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Christiaan Hoff
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J Th Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - David D E Zimmerman
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Muhammed Hadithi
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Morreau
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Hans F A Vasen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eelco J R de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - James C H Hardwick
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van der Valk MJM, van der Sande ME, Toebes RE, Breukink SO, Bröker MEE, Doornebosch PG, Maliko N, Neijenhuis PA, Marinelli AWKS, Peters FP, Peeters KCMJ, Beets GL, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Hilling DE. Importance of patient reported and clinical outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and their treating physicians. Do clinicians know what patients want? Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1634-1641. [PMID: 32336626 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several factors are included in decision making for treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, including a trade-off between risks and gains of both clinical and functional outcomes. However, it is largely unknown which outcomes are most important to patients and whether this differs between patients and clinicians. METHODS Both clinicians and patients treated for locally advanced rectal cancer were invited to fill out an online questionnaire, including a choice-based conjoint experiment. Participants were presented 14 comparisons of two hypothetical case presentations, characterized by different treatments and outcomes of care (6 attributes) and were asked to select the case with the best outcome at that moment. Hierarchical Bayes Estimation was used to calculate the relative importance (RI) of each of the six attributes. RESULTS In total, 94 patients and 128 clinicians completed the questionnaire. For patients, avoiding surgery with permanent stoma was most important (RI 24.4, 95%CI 21.88-26.87) and a 2-year difference in disease-free survival was least important (RI 5.6, 95%CI 4.9-6.2). Clinicians assigned highest importance to avoiding severe and daily worries about cancer recurrence (RI 30.7, 95%CI 29.1-32.4), while this was ranked 4th by patients (RI 17.9, 95%CI 16.5-19.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION When confronted with different outcomes within one case description, patients find the duration of disease free survival the least important. In addition, considerable differences were found between the importance assigned by patients and clinicians to clinical and functional outcomes, most notably in avoiding surgery with permanent stoma and worries about recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime J M van der Valk
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-National Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marit E van der Sande
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-National Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renee E Toebes
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-National Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie O Breukink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mirelle E E Bröker
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle a/d IJssel, the Netherlands
| | | | - Nansi Maliko
- Department of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Femke P Peters
- Department of Radiotherapy, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-National Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-National Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Denise E Hilling
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-National Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoendervangers S, Sparreboom CL, Intven MPW, Lange JF, Verkooijen HM, Doornebosch PG, van Grevenstein WMU. The effect of neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and delayed surgery versus chemoradiation on postoperative outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer patients - A propensity score matched nationwide audit-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1605-1612. [PMID: 32192792 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate differences in postoperative outcomes between short-course radiotherapy and delayed surgery (SCRT-delay) and chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). BACKGROUND Previous trials suggest that SCRT-delay could serve as an adequate neoadjuvant treatment for LARC. Therefore, in frail LARC patients SCRT-delay is recommended as an alternative to CRT. However, data on postoperative outcomes after SCRT-delay in comparison to CRT is scarce. METHODS This was an observational study with data from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (DCRA). LARC patients who underwent surgery (2014-2017) after an interval of ≥6 weeks were included. Missing values were replaced by multiple imputation. Propensity score matching (PSM), using age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, cT-stage and surgical procedure, was applied to create comparable groups. Differences in postoperative outcomes were analyzed using Chi-square test for categorical variables, independent sample t-test for continuous variables and Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data. RESULTS 2926 patients were included. In total, 288 patients received SCRT-delay and 2638 patients underwent CRT. Patients in the SCRT-delay group were older and had more comorbidities. Also, ICU-admissions and permanent colostomies were more common, as well as pulmonic, cardiologic, infectious and neurologic complications. After PSM, both groups comprised 246 patients with equivalent age, comorbidities and tumor stage. There were no differences in postoperative complications. CONCLUSION Postoperative complications were not increased in LARC patients undergoing SCRT-delay as neoadjuvant treatment. Regarding treatment-related complications, SCRT-delay is a safe alternative neoadjuvant treatment option for frail LARC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hoendervangers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - C L Sparreboom
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
van der Poel MJ, Fichtinger RS, Bemelmans M, Bosscha K, Braat AE, de Boer MT, Dejong CHC, Doornebosch PG, Draaisma WA, Gerhards MF, Gobardhan PD, Gorgec B, Hagendoorn J, Kazemier G, Klaase J, Leclercq WKG, Liem MS, Lips DJ, Marsman HA, Mieog JSD, Molenaar QI, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Nota CL, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Slooter GD, Stommel MWJ, Swijnenburg RJ, Tanis PJ, Te Riele WW, Terkivatan T, van den Tol PM, van den Boezem PB, van der Hoeven JA, Vermaas M, Abu Hilal M, van Dam RM, Besselink MG. Implementation and outcome of minor and major minimally invasive liver surgery in the Netherlands. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1734-1743. [PMID: 31235430 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While most of the evidence on minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) is derived from expert centers, nationwide outcomes remain underreported. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation and outcome of MILS on a nationwide scale. METHODS Electronic patient files were reviewed in all Dutch liver surgery centers and all patients undergoing MILS between 2011 and 2016 were selected. Operative outcomes were stratified based on extent of the resection and annual MILS volume. RESULTS Overall, 6951 liver resections were included, with a median annual volume of 50 resections per center. The overall use of MILS was 13% (n = 916), which varied from 3% to 36% (P < 0.001) between centers. The nationwide use of MILS increased from 6% in 2011 to 23% in 2016 (P < 0.001). Outcomes of minor MILS were comparable with international studies (conversion 0-13%, mortality <1%). In centers which performed ≥20 MILS annually, major MILS was associated with less conversions (14 (11%) versus 41 (30%), P < 0.001), shorter operating time (184 (117-239) versus 200 (139-308) minutes, P = 0.010), and less overall complications (37 (30%) versus 58 (42%), P = 0.040). CONCLUSION The nationwide use of MILS is increasing, although large variation remains between centers. Outcomes of major MILS are better in centers with higher volumes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel J van der Poel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert S Fichtinger
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Andries E Braat
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke T de Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H C Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - Werner A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Burak Gorgec
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Quintus I Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Carolijn L Nota
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Türkan Terkivatan
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petrousjka M van den Tol
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - Moh'd Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van Groningen JT, van Hagen P, Tollenaar RAEM, Tuynman JB, de Mheen PJMV, Doornebosch PG, Tanis PJ, de Graaf EJR. Evaluation of a Completion Total Mesorectal Excision in Patients After Local Excision of Rectal Cancer: A Word of Caution. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 16:822-828. [PMID: 30006424 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: According to Dutch guidelines, locally excised, low-risk, pT1 or ypT0-1 rectal cancer should not necessarily be followed by completion total mesorectal excision (cTME) in contrast to rectal cancers with higher T stages or unfavorable features. This study evaluated cTME after local excision at a national level with possible determinants for decision-making. Methods: All patients in the Dutch Colorectal Audit (DCRA) who underwent local excision of rectal cancer between 2012 and 2015 were included. Guideline adherence for performing cTME was determined with univariate and multivariate analyses to identify factors related to noncompliance. Results: According to the guidelines, of 530 included patients, cTME was indicated in 283 (53%), and among those, was performed in 82 (29%). Guideline adherence for performing cTME improved significantly (P<.001), from 10% in 2012 to 44% in 2015. Lower Charlson comorbidity index in patients with high-risk pT1 rectal cancer and younger patients (aged 61-70 years vs ≥80 years) with pT≥2 rectal cancer were associated with increased performance of cTME (odds ratio [OR], 13.50; 95% CI, 1.39-131.32, and OR, 6.25; 95% CI, 1.83-21.31, respectively). Conclusions: In this population-based study from the Netherlands, only a minority of patients underwent cTME after local excision of rectal cancer with pathologic features indicating the need for further treatment according to the guidelines. Although the percentage of patients undergoing cTME increased over time, the study indicated a tendency toward rectal-preserving treatment with potential oncologic risks.
Collapse
|
19
|
Verseveld M, de Wilt JH, Elferink MA, de Graaf EJ, Verhoef C, Pouwels S, Doornebosch PG. Survival after local excision for rectal cancer: a population-based overview of clinical practice and outcome. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1163-1166. [PMID: 31106636 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1616816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Verseveld
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam/Schiedam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H.W. de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eelco J.R. de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjaak Pouwels
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Buisman FE, Homs MYV, Grünhagen DJ, Filipe WF, Bennink RJ, Besselink MGH, Borel Rinkes IHM, Bruijnen RCG, Cercek A, D'Angelica MI, van Delden OM, Donswijk ML, van Doorn L, Doornebosch PG, Emmering J, Erdmann JI, IJzerman NS, Grootscholten C, Hagendoorn J, Kemeny NE, Kingham TP, Klompenhouwer EG, Kok NFM, Koolen S, Kuhlmann KFD, Kuiper MC, Lam MGE, Mathijssen RHJ, Moelker A, Oomen-de Hoop E, Punt CJA, Te Riele WW, Roodhart JML, Swijnenburg RJ, Prevoo W, Tanis PJ, Vermaas M, Versleijen MWJ, Veuger FP, Weterman MJ, Verhoef C, Groot Koerkamp B. Adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy and resection versus resection alone in patients with low-risk resectable colorectal liver metastases - the multicenter randomized controlled PUMP trial. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:327. [PMID: 30953467 PMCID: PMC6451273 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5515-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recurrences are reported in 70% of all patients after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), in which half are confined to the liver. Adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy aims to reduce the risk of intrahepatic recurrence. A large retrospective propensity score analysis demonstrated that HAIP chemotherapy is particularly effective in patients with low-risk oncological features. The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) --the PUMP trial-- is to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant HAIP chemotherapy in low-risk patients with resectable CRLM. Methods This is an open label multicenter RCT. A total of 230 patients with resectable CRLM without extrahepatic disease will be included. Only patients with a clinical risk score (CRS) of 0 to 2 are eligible, meaning: patients are allowed to have no more than two out of five poor prognostic factors (disease-free interval less than 12 months, node-positive colorectal cancer, more than 1 CRLM, largest CRLM more than 5 cm in diameter, serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen above 200 μg/L). Patients randomized to arm A undergo complete resection of CRLM without any adjuvant treatment, which is the standard of care in the Netherlands. Patients in arm B receive an implantable pump at the time of CRLM resection and start adjuvant HAIP chemotherapy 4–12 weeks after surgery, with 6 cycles of floxuridine scheduled. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, hepatic PFS, safety, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Pharmacokinetics of intra-arterial administration of floxuridine will be investigated as well as predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of HAIP chemotherapy. In a side study, the accuracy of CT angiography will be compared to radionuclide scintigraphy to detect extrahepatic perfusion. We hypothesize that adjuvant HAIP chemotherapy leads to improved survival, improved quality of life, and a reduction of costs, compared to resection alone. Discussion If this PUMP trial demonstrates that adjuvant HAIP chemotherapy improves survival in low-risk patients, this treatment approach may be implemented in the standard of care of patients with resected CRLM since adjuvant systemic chemotherapy alone has not improved survival. Trial registration The PUMP trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), number: 7493. Date of registration September 23, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F E Buisman
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - M Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W F Filipe
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G H Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A Cercek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M I D'Angelica
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - O M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L van Doorn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - J Emmering
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N S IJzerman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Grootscholten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - N E Kemeny
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - T P Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - E G Klompenhouwer
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M C Kuiper
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G E Lam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Oomen-de Hoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R J Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Prevoo
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - M W J Versleijen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F P Veuger
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M J Weterman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Veltcamp Helbach M, van Oostendorp SE, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ, Stockmann HBAC, Oosterling SJ, Vuylsteke RCLM, de Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG, Hompes R, Bonjer HJ, Sietses C, Tuynman JB. Structured training pathway and proctoring; multicenter results of the implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in the Netherlands. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:192-201. [PMID: 30888498 PMCID: PMC6946716 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06750-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a new complex technique with potential to improve the quality of surgical mesorectal excision for patients with mid and low rectal cancer. The procedure is technically challenging and has shown to be associated with a relative long learning curve which might hamper widespread adoption. Therefore, a national structured training pathway for TaTME has been set up in the Netherlands to allow safe implementation. The aim of this study was to monitor safety and efficacy of the training program with 12 centers. Methods Short-term outcomes of the first ten TaTME procedures were evaluated in 12 participating centers in the Netherlands within the national structured training pathway. Consecutive patients operated during and after the proctoring program for rectal carcinoma with curative intent were included. Primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative complications, secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and pathological outcomes. Results In October 2018, 12 hospitals completed the training program and from each center the first 10 patients were included for evaluation. Intraoperative complications occurred in 4.9% of the cases. The clinicopathological outcome reported 100% for complete or nearly complete specimen, 100% negative distal resection margin, and the circumferential resection margin was positive in 5.0% of patients. Overall postoperative complication rate was 45.0%, with 19.2% Clavien–Dindo ≥ III and an anastomotic leak rate of 17.3%. Conclusions This study shows that the nationwide structured training program for TaTME delivers safe implementation of TaTME in terms of intraoperative and pathology outcomes within the first ten consecutive cases in each center. However, postoperative morbidity is substantial even within a structured training pathway and surgeons should be aware of the learning curve of this new technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Veltcamp Helbach
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - S E van Oostendorp
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T W A Koedam
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J Knol
- Department of Surgery, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt and Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
| | - H B A C Stockmann
- Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - S J Oosterling
- Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - R C L M Vuylsteke
- Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - E J R de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Cappelle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Cappelle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - R Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - J B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Leijtens JW, Koedam TW, Borstlap WA, Maas M, Doornebosch PG, Karsten TM, Derksen EJ, Stassen LP, Rosman C, de Graaf EJ, Bremers AJ, Heemskerk J, Beets GL, Tuynman JB, Rademakers KL. Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery with or without Completion Total Mesorectal Excision for T2 and T3 Rectal Carcinoma. Dig Surg 2018; 36:76-82. [PMID: 29791891 PMCID: PMC6390444 DOI: 10.1159/000486555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 12/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
AIM Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is used for the resection of large rectal adenomas and well or moderately differentiated T1 carcinomas. Due to difficulty in preoperative staging, final pathology may reveal a carcinoma not suitable for TEM. Although completion total mesorectal excision is considered standard of care in T2 or more invasive carcinomas, this completion surgery is not always performed. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the outcome of patients after TEM-only, when completion surgery would be indicated. METHODS In this retrospective multicenter, observational cohort study, outcome after TEM-only (n = 41) and completion surgery (n = 40) following TEM for a pT2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma was compared. RESULTS Median follow-up was 29 months for the TEM-only group and 31 months for the completion surgery group. Local recurrence rate was 35 and 11% for the TEM-only and completion surgery groups respectively. Distant metastasis occurred in 16% of the patients in both groups. The 3-year overall survival was 63% in the TEM-only group and 91% in the completion surgery group respectively. Three-year disease-specific survival was 91 versus 93% respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although local recurrence after TEM-only for pT2-3 rectal cancer is worse compared to the recurrence that occurs after completion surgery, disease-specific survival is comparable between both groups. The lower unadjusted overall survival in the TEM-only group indicates that TEM-only may be a valid alternative in older and frail patients, especially when high morbidity of completion surgery is taken into consideration. Nevertheless, completion surgery should always be advised when curation is intended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas W.A. Koedam
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,*Thomas W.A. Koedam, Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam (The Netherlands), E-Mail
| | | | - Monique Maas
- Deparment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tom M. Karsten
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J. Derksen
- Department of Surgery, MC Slotervaart, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laurents P.S. Stassen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eelco J.R. de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen Heemskerk
- Department of Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L. Beets
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B. Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zaimi I, Sparreboom CL, Lingsma HF, Doornebosch PG, Menon AG, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Wouters MWJM, Lange JF. The effect of age on anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery: A population-based study. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:113-120. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.25108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Zaimi
- Department of Surgery; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Cloë L. Sparreboom
- Department of Surgery; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Hester F. Lingsma
- Department of Public Health; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Pascal G. Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery; IJsselland Ziekenhuis; Capelle aan den IJssel The Netherlands
| | - Anand G. Menon
- Department of Surgery; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery; Havenziekenhuis; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Gert-Jan Kleinrensink
- Department of Neuroscience-Anatomy; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Jeekel
- Department of Neuroscience-Anatomy; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Michel W. J. M. Wouters
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing; Leiden The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology; Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Johan F. Lange
- Department of Surgery; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery; Havenziekenhuis; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Barendse RM, Musters GD, de Graaf EJR, van den Broek FJC, Consten ECJ, Doornebosch PG, Hardwick JC, de Hingh IHJT, Hoff C, Jansen JM, van Milligen de Wit AWM, van der Schelling GP, Schoon EJ, Schwartz MP, Weusten BLAM, Dijkgraaf MG, Fockens P, Bemelman WA, Dekker E. Randomised controlled trial of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND Study). Gut 2018; 67:837-846. [PMID: 28659349 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2016] [Revised: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-randomised studies suggest that endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is equally effective in removing large rectal adenomas as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), but EMR might be more cost-effective and safer. This trial compares the clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of TEM and EMR for large rectal adenomas. DESIGN Patients with rectal adenomas ≥3 cm, without malignant features, were randomised (1:1) to EMR or TEM, allowing endoscopic removal of residual adenoma at 3 months. Unexpected malignancies were excluded postrandomisation. Primary outcomes were recurrence within 24 months (aiming to demonstrate non-inferiority of EMR, upper limit 10%) and the number of recurrence-free days alive and out of hospital. RESULTS Two hundred and four patients were treated in 18 university and community hospitals. Twenty-seven (13%) had unexpected cancer and were excluded from further analysis. Overall recurrence rates were 15% after EMR and 11% after TEM; statistical non-inferiority was not reached. The numbers of recurrence-free days alive and out of hospital were similar (EMR 609±209, TEM 652±188, p=0.16). Complications occurred in 18% (EMR) versus 26% (TEM) (p=0.23), with major complications occurring in 1% (EMR) versus 8% (TEM) (p=0.064). Quality-adjusted life years were equal in both groups. EMR was approximately €3000 cheaper and therefore more cost-effective. CONCLUSION Under the statistical assumptions of this study, non-inferiority of EMR could not be demonstrated. However, EMR may have potential as the primary method of choice due to a tendency of lower complication rates and a better cost-effectiveness ratio. The high rate of unexpected cancers should be dealt with in further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée M Barendse
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James C Hardwick
- Gastroenterology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Chrisiaan Hoff
- Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Gastroenterology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Erik J Schoon
- Gastroenterology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Gastroenterology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Fockens
- Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bronzwaer MES, Musters GD, Barendse RM, Koens L, de Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG, Schwartz MP, Consten ECJ, Schoon EJ, de Hingh IHJT, Tanis PJ, Dekker E, Fockens P. The occurrence and characteristics of endoscopically unexpected malignant degeneration in large rectal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87:862-871.e1. [PMID: 29030001 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Large non-pedunculated rectal polyps are most commonly resected by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Despite pre-procedural diagnostics, unexpected rectal cancer is incidentally encountered within the resected specimen. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic assessment and procedural characteristics of lesions with and without unexpected submucosal invasion. METHODS A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized trial (TREND study) was performed in which patients with a non-pedunculated rectal polyp of ≥3 cm without endoscopic suspicion of invasive growth were randomized between EMR and TEM. RESULTS Unexpected rectal cancer was detected in 13% (27/203) of patients; 15 after EMR and 12 after TEM. Most consisted of low-risk T1 cancers (78%, n = 18). There were no differences in the diagnostic assessment between lesions with and without unexpected submucosal invasion. Diagnostic biopsies revealed similar rates of high-grade dysplasia (28% [7/25] vs 18% [26/144]). When compared with EMR of adenomas, EMR procedures of unexpected cancers had a lower success rate of submucosal lifting (60% vs 93%, P < .001), were more often assessed as endoscopically incomplete (33% vs 10%, P = .01), and were more frequently terminated prematurely (60% vs 8%, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Diagnostic assessment of large non-pedunculated rectal polyps revealed similar characteristics between unexpected cancers and adenomas. Unexpected cancers during EMR were non-lifting in 40%, endoscopically assessed as incomplete in 33%, and terminated prematurely in 60%. In treatment-naive patients, these factors should raise suspicion of malignancy and need discussion in a multidisciplinary team meeting for decision on further treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime E S Bronzwaer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gijsbert D Musters
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renée M Barendse
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lianne Koens
- Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eelco J R de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shapiro J, de Graaf JJJC, Doornebosch PG, Vermaas M, de Graaf EJR. Laparoscopic Rectovaginopexy for Neorectal Prolapse After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61:260. [PMID: 29337782 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Shapiro
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
van der Valk MJ, de Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, Vermaas M. Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Perineal Wounds After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer, a Pilot Study. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2017; 6:425-429. [PMID: 29279806 DOI: 10.1089/wound.2017.0749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is associated with high incidence of surgical wound infections. The use of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is known to reduce wound infections for several surgical indications. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the potential of a new portable negative-pressure therapy device on perineal wound healing in patients undergoing APR. Approach: A new single-use incisional negative-pressure therapy device was applied in 10 patients. A negative pressure of -80 mmHg was continued for 7 days postsurgery. Incidence of wound complications and time to wound healing were compared with a historical control group of 10 patients undergoing APR in 2014, treated with conventional wound care. Results: Patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. Mean 1.6 dressings were used per patient. A wound complication was diagnosed in seven patients versus six in the control group. Wound infections were diagnosed median 11.5 days after surgery, compared with 10.5 days in the control group. Duration of wound healing was shorter in the study group (median 8.5 weeks vs. 13 weeks). Innovation: This is the first study to report on the use of this iNPWT device for patients who underwent APR for rectal cancer. Conclusion: In this study, iNPWT did not reduce wound complications. Wound infections occurred slightly later and seemed to have a less severe clinical course. After treatment with iNPWT, the duration of wound healing was shorter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime J.M. van der Valk
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de IJssel, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eelco J.R. de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de IJssel, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de IJssel, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Grotenhuis BA, Nonner J, de Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG. Implementation of a New High-Volume Circular Stapler in Stapled Anopexy for Hemorrhoidal Disease: Is Patient's Short-Term Outcome Affected by a Higher Volume of Resected Tissue? Dig Surg 2017; 35:406-410. [PMID: 29131098 DOI: 10.1159/000480355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Accepted: 08/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stapled anopexy is a safe technique for the treatment of hemorrhoids but carries a higher risk of recurrence, which might be caused due to the limited volume of resected tissue. In this study, we investigated the introduction of a high-volume circular stapling device; in particular whether an increased amount of resected tissue could affect patients' short-term postoperative outcome. METHODS Between 2011 and 2015, stapled anopexy was performed for hemorrhoids and/or anal prolapse in 141 patients (n = 25 conventional PPH-3©-stapler versus n = 116 high-volume CHEX©-stapler). In this prospectively collected dataset, operation details and short-term postoperative outcome were compared. RESULTS With the high-volume stapler, a significantly higher amount of tissue was resected: 9.8 g (range 6.2-11.4) vs. 6.4 g (range 4.9-8.8) with the conventional stapler, p < 0.01. Postoperative short-term outcome did not differ in terms of readmission and complication rates. In all 5 patients who underwent a redo operation for residual hemorrhoids or prolapse, the high-volume stapler was used in the primary operation. CONCLUSION A high-volume stapling device for stapled anopexy was introduced safely with a significantly higher amount of resected tissue without a worse short-term outcome. However, it remains unclear whether higher stapling volumes may lead to improved long-term outcome with less reinterventions.
Collapse
|
29
|
de Graaf EJR, de Graaf JJJC, Schot I, van Boxsel T, Ter Borg S, Doornebosch PG, Vermaas M. TAMIS of a rectal haemangioma - a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18:1110. [PMID: 27630093 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- E J R de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterology, Radiology and Pathology, IJsselland hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.
| | - J J J C de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterology, Radiology and Pathology, IJsselland hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - I Schot
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterology, Radiology and Pathology, IJsselland hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - T van Boxsel
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterology, Radiology and Pathology, IJsselland hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - S Ter Borg
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterology, Radiology and Pathology, IJsselland hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterology, Radiology and Pathology, IJsselland hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterology, Radiology and Pathology, IJsselland hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van Vledder MG, Doornebosch PG, de Graaf EJR. Transanal endoscopic surgery for complications of prior rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:5356-5363. [PMID: 27059974 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4888-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 03/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term complications of previous rectal surgery (e.g., enterovisceral fistula, anastomotic stricture, rectal stenosis) can be challenging problems for which transabdominal or transperineal surgery with or without definitive fecal diversion is often required. Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) might allow for local treatment of these complications, thereby saving patients from otherwise major surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients undergoing TES in the IJsselland Hospital (NL) since 1996 were recorded in a prospective database, of which twenty patients were treated for complications after previous rectal surgery. Data on prior treatment, surgical techniques, outcomes, and need for additional surgery were collected. RESULTS Twenty patients were identified from the database (rectourinary fistula n = 3, rectovaginal fistula n = 5, anastomotic stricture n = 8, and rectal stenosis n = 4). One of the three (33 %) rectourinary fistulas and two of five (40 %) rectovaginal fistulas were successfully treated with TES. Anastomotic strictures were successfully treated in 5/8 (63 %) patients. Strictures after local excision of rectal tumors were successfully treated in 3/4 (75 %) patients. No minor complication and one major complication occurred (rectovaginal fistula after stenoplasty eventually requiring Hartmann's procedure). CONCLUSIONS Transanal treatment of anastomotic strictures, rectal stenosis, and fistula after prior rectal surgery is safe and effective in a large proportion of patients. TES should be considered as a first step in all patients presenting with these late complications after rectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G van Vledder
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Prins Constantijnweg 2, PO 690, 2900 AR, Capelle Ad IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Prins Constantijnweg 2, PO 690, 2900 AR, Capelle Ad IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Eelco J R de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Prins Constantijnweg 2, PO 690, 2900 AR, Capelle Ad IJssel, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Verseveld M, Barendse RM, Gosselink MP, Verhoef C, de Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: impact on quality of life and functional outcome. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:1184-7. [PMID: 26139488 PMCID: PMC4757623 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4326-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is emerging as an alternative to transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Quality of life (QOL) and functional outcome are important aspects when valuing a new technique. The aim of this prospective study was to assess both functional outcome and QOL after TAMIS. METHODS From 2011 to 2013, patients were prospectively studied prior to and at least 6 months after TAMIS for rectal adenomas and low-risk T1 carcinomas using a single-site laparoscopy port. Functional outcome was determined using the Faecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI). Quality of life was measured using functional [Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL)] and generic (EuroQol EQ-5D) questionnaires. RESULTS The study population consisted of 24 patients 13 men, median age 59 (range 42-83) with 24 tumours [median distance from the dentate line 8 cm (range 2-17 cm); median tumour size 6 cm(2) (range 0.25-51 cm(2)); 20 adenomas; 4 low-risk T1 carcinomas]. Post-operative complications occurred in one patient (4 %; grade IIIb according to Clavien Dindo classification). Compared to baseline, FISI remained unaffected (9.8 vs 7.3; P = 0.26), FIQL remained unaffected, and EuroQol EQ-5D improved (EQ-VAS: 77 vs 83; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION There was no detrimental effect of TAMIS on anorectal function. Overall QOL was improved after TAMIS, probably due to removal of the tumour, and at 6 months was equal to the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Verseveld
- Department of General Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, P.O. Box 960, Capelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Renée M Barendse
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eelco J R de Graaf
- Department of General Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, P.O. Box 960, Capelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of General Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, P.O. Box 960, Capelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Burgers PTPW, Poolman RW, Van Bakel TMJ, Tuinebreijer WE, Zielinski SM, Bhandari M, Patka P, Van Lieshout EMM, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Einhorn TA, Thabane L, Schemitsch EH, Koval KJ, Frihagen F, Poolman RW, Tetsworth K, Guerra-Farfan E, Walter SD, Sprague S, Swinton M, Scott T, McKay P, Madden K, Heels-Ansdell D, Buckingham L, Duraikannan A, Silva H, Heetveld MJ, Van Lieshout EMM, Burgers PT, Zura RD, Avram V, Manjoo A, Williams D, Antoniou J, Ramsay T, Bogoch ER, Trenholm A, Lyman S, Mazumdar M, Bozic KJ, Luborsky M, Goodman S, Muray S, Korley R, Buckley R, Duffy P, Puloski S, Carcary K, Lorenzo M, McKee MD, Hall JA, Nauth A, Whelan D, Daniels TR, Waddell JP, Ahn H, Vicente MR, Hidy JT, MacNevin MT, Kreder H, Axelrod T, Jenkinson R, Nousiainen M, Stephen D, Wadey V, Kunz M, Milner K, Cagaanan R, MacNevin M, O’Brien PJ, Blachut PA, Broekhuyse HM, Guy P, Lefaivre KA, Slobogean GP, Johal R, Leung I, Coles C, Leighton R, Richardson CG, Biddulph M, Gross M, Dunbar M, Amirault JD, Alexander D, Coady C, Glazebrook M, Johnston D, Oxner W, Reardon G, Wong I, Trask K, MacDonald S, Furey A, Stone C, Parsons M, Stone T, Zomar M, McCormack R, Apostle K, Boyer D, Moola F, Perey B, Viskontas D, Moon K, Moon R, Laflamme Y, Benoit B, Ranger P, Malo M, Fernandes J, Tardif K, Fournier J, Vendittoli PA, Massé V, Roy AG, Lavigne M, Lusignan D, Davis C, Stull P, Weinerman S, Weingarten P, Lindenbaum S, Hewitt M, Danielwicz R, Baker J, Mont M, Delanois DE, Kapadia B, Issa K, Mullen M, Sems A, Foreman B, Parvizi J, Morrison T, Lewis C, Caminiti S, Tornetta P, Creevy WR, Lespasio MJ, Carlisle H, Marcantonio A, Kain M, Specht L, Tilzey J, Garfi J, Mehta S, Esterhai JL, Ahn J, Donegan D, Horan A, McGinnis K, Roberson J, Bradbury T, Erens G, Webb K, Mullis B, Shively K, Parr A, Ertl J, Worman R, Webster M, Cummings J, Frizzell V, Moore M, Jones CB, Ringler JR, Sietsema DL, Walker JE, Kanlic E, Abdelgawad A, Shunia J, DePaolo C, Sutherland S, Alosky R, Zura R, Manson M, Strathy G, Peter K, Johnson P, Morton M, Shaer J, Schrickel T, Hileman B, Hanes M, Chance E, Heinrich EM, Dodgin D, LaBadie M, Zamorano D, Tynan M, Schwarzkopf R, Scolaro JA, Gupta R, Bederman S, Bhatia N, Hoang B, Kiester D, Jones N, Rafijah G, Alavekios D, Lee J, Mehta A, Schroder S, Chao T, Colin V, Dang P(P, Heng SK, Lopez G, Galle S, Pahlavan S, Phan DL, Tapadia M, Bui C, Jain N, Moore T, Moroski N, Pourmand D, Kubiak EN, Gililland J, Rothberg D, Peters C, Pelt C, Stuart AR, Corbey K, Shuler FD, Day J, Garabekyan T, Cheung F, Oliashirazi A, Salava J, Morgan L, Wilson-Byrne T, Cordle MB, Elmans LH, van den Hout JA, Joosten AJP, van Beurden AFA, Bolder SBT, Eygendaal D, Moonen AF, van Geenen RCI, Hoebink EA, Wagenmakers R, van Helden W, van Jonbergen HPW, Roerdink H, Reuver JM, Barnaart AFW, Flikweert ER, Krips R, Mullers JB, Schüller H, Falke MLM, Kurek FJ, Slingerland ACH, van Dijk JP, van Helden WH, Bolhuis HW, Bullens PHJ, Hogervorst M, de Kroon KE, Jansen RH, Steenstra F, Raven EEJ, Fontijne WPJ, Wiersma SC, Boetes B, ten Holder EJT, van der Heide HJL, Nagels J, van der Linden-van der Zwaag EH, Keizer SB, Swen JWA, den Hollander PHC, Thomassen BJW, Molekamp WJK, de Meulemeester FR, Kleipool AEB, Haverlag R, Simons MP, Mutsaerts EL, Kooijman R, Postema RR, Bleker RJ, Lampe HIH, Schuman L, Cheung J, van Bommel F, Winia WP, Haverkamp D, van der Vis H, Nolte PA, van den Bekerom MPJ, de Jong T, van Noort A, Vergroesen DA, Schutte BG, van der Vis HM, Beimers L, de Vries J, Zurcher AW, Albers GR, Rademakers M, Breugem S, van der Haven I, Jan Damen P, Bulstra GH, Campo MM, Somford MP, Haverkamp D, Liew S, Bedi H, Carr A, Chia A, Csongvay S, Donohue C, Doig S, Edwards E, Esser M, Freeman R, Gong A, Li D, Miller R, Ton L, Wang O, Young I, Dowrick A, Murdoch Z, Sage C, Page R, Bainbridge D, Angliss R, Miller B, Thomson A, Brown G, Williams S, Eng K, Bowyer D, Skelley J, Goyal C, Beattie S, Guerado E, Cruz E, Cano JR, Froufe MA, Serra LM, Al-dirra S, Martinez C, Tarazona Santabalbina FJ, Serra JT, Hernandez JT, Garcia MA, Garcia VM, Barrera S, Garrido M, Nordsletten L, Clarke-Jenssen J, Hjorthaug G, Brekke AC, Vesterhus EB, Skaugrud I, Tripathi P, Katiyar S, Shukla P, Swiontkowski M, Guyatt G, Jeray K, Walter S, Viveiros H, Truong V, Koo K, Zhou Q, Maddock D, Simunovic N, Agel J, Zielinski SM, Rangan A, Hanusch BC, Kottam L, Clarkson R, Della Rocca GJ, Slobogean G, Katz J, Gillespie B, Greendale GA, Hartman C, Rubin C, Waddell J, Lemke HM, Oatt A, Buckley RE, Korley R, Johnston K, Powell J, Sanders D, Lawendy A, Tieszer C, Murnaghan J, Nam D, Yee A, Whelan DB, Wild LM, Khan RM, Coady C, Amirault D, Richardson G, Dobbin G, Bicknell R, Yach J, Bardana D, Wood G, Harrison M, Yen D, Lambert S, Howells F, Ward A, Zalzal P, Brien H, Naumetz V, Weening B, Wai EK, Papp S, Gofton WT, Kingwell SP, Johnson G, O’Neil J, Roffey DM, Borsella V, Oliver TM, Jones V, Endres TJ, Agnew SG, Jeray KJ, Broderick JS, Goetz DR, Pace TB, Schaller TM, Porter SE, Tanner SL, Snider RG, Nastoff LA, Bielby SA, Switzer JA, Cole PA, Anderson SA, Lafferty PM, Li M, Ly TV, Marston SB, Foley AL, Vang S, Wright DM, Marcantonio AJ, Kain MSH, Iorio R, Specht LM, Tilzey JF, Lobo MJ, Garfi JS, Vallier HA, Dolenc A, Robinson C, Prayson MJ, Laughlin R, Rubino LJ, May J, Rieser GR, Dulaney-Cripe L, Gayton C, Gorczyca JT, Gross JM, Humphrey CA, Kates S, Noble K, McIntyre AW, Pecorella K, Davis CA, Lindenbaum S, Schwappach J, Baker JK, Rutherford T, Newman H, Lieberman S, Finn E, Robbins K, Hurley M, Lyle L, Mitchell K, Browner K, Whatley E, Payton K, Reeves C, Cannada LK, Karges D, Hill L, Esterhai J, Horan AD, Kaminski CA, Kowalski BN, Keeve JP, Anderson CG, McDonald MD, Hoffman JM, Tarkin I, Siska P, Gruen G, Evans A, Farrell DJ, Irrgang J, Luther A, Cross WW, Cass JR, Sems SA, Torchia ME, Scrabeck T, Jenkins M, Dumais J, Romero AW, Sagebien CA, Butler MS, Monica JT, Seuffert P, Hsu JR, Ficke J, Charlton M, Napierala M, Fan M, Tannoury C, Archdeacon M, Finnan R, Le T, Wyrick J, Hess S, Brennan ML, Probe R, Kile E, Mills K, Clipper L, Yu M, Erwin K, Horwitz D, Strohecker K, Swenson TK, Schmidt AH, Westberg JR, Aurang K, Zohman G, Peterson B, Huff RB, Baele J, Weber T, Edison M, McBeth J, Ertl JP, Parr JA, Moore MM, Tobias E, Thomas E, DePaolo CJ, Shell LE, Hampton L, Shepard S, Nanney T, Cuento C, Cantu RV, Henderson ER, Eickhoff LS, Hammerberg EM, Stahel P, Hak D, Mauffrey C, Gibula D, Gissel H, Henderson C, Zamorano DP, Tynan MC, Lawson D, Crist BD, Murtha YM, Anderson LK, Linehan C, Pilling L, Lewis CG, Sullivan RJ, Roper E, Obremskey W, Kregor P, Richards JE, Stringfellow K, Dohm MP, Zellar A, Segers MJM, Zijl JAC, Verhoeven B, Smits AB, de Vries JPPM, Fioole B, van der Hoeven H, Theunissen EBM, de Vries Reilingh TS, Govaert L, Wittich P, de Brauw M, Wille J, Go PM, Ritchie ED, Wessel RN, Hammacher ER, Visser GA, Stockmann H, Silvis R, Snellen JP, Rijbroek B, Scheepers JJG, Vermeulen EGJ, Siroen MPC, Vuylsteke R, Brom HLF, Rijna H, de Rijcke PAR, Koppert CL, Buijk SE, Groenendijk RPR, Dawson I, Tetteroo GWM, Bruijninckx MMM, Doornebosch PG, de Graaf EJR, van der Elst M, van der Pol CC, van’t Riet M, Karsten TM, de Vries MR, Stassen LPS, Schep NWL, Ben Schmidt G, Hoffman WH, van der Heijden FH, Willems WJ, van der Hart CP, Turckan K, Festen S, de Nies F, Out NJM, Bosma J, van Kampen A, Biert J, van Vugt AB, Edwards MJR, Blokhuis TJ, Frölke JPM, Geeraedts LMG, Gardeniers JWM, Tan ET, Poelhekke LM, de Waal Malefijt MC, Schreurs B, Roukema GR, Josaputra HA, Keller P, de Rooij PD, Kuiken H, Boxma H, Cleffken BI, Liem R, Rhemrev SJ, Bosman CHR, de Mol van Otterloo A, Hoogendoorn J, de Vries AC, Meylaerts SAG, Verhofstad MHJ, Meijer J, van Egmond T, van der Brand I, Patka P, Eversdijk MG, Peters R, Den Hartog D, Van Waes OJF, Oprel P, Campo M, Verhagen R, Albers GR, Simmermacher RKJ, van Mulken J, van Wessem K, van Gaalen SM, Leenen LPH, Bronkhorst MW, Guicherit OR, Goslings JC, Ponsen KJ, Bhatia M, Arora V, Tyagi V, Gupta A, Jain N, Khan F, Sharma A, Sanghavi A, Trivedi M, Rai A, Subash, Rai K, Yadav V, Singh S, Prasad AS, Mishra V, Sundaresh DC, Khanna A, Cherian JJ, Olakkengil DJ, Sharma G, Dadi A, Palla N, Ganguly U, Rai BS, Rajakumar J, Hull P, Lewis S, Evans S, Nanda R, Logishetty R, Anand S, Bowler C, Jennings A, Chuter G, Rose G, Horner G, Clark C, Eke K, Reed M, Herriott C, Dobb C, Curry H, Etherington G, Jain A, Moaveni A, Russ M, Donald G, Weinrauch P, Pincus P, Yang S, Halliday B, Gervais T, Holt M, Flynn A, Pirpiris M, Love D, Bucknill A, Farrugia RJ, Ianssen T, Amundsen A, Brattgjerd JE, Borch T, Bøe B, Flatøy B, Hasselund S, Haug KJ, Hemlock K, Hoseth TM, Jomaas G, Kibsgård T, Lona T, Moatshe G, Müller O, Molund M, Nicolaisen T, Nilsen F, Rydinge J, Smedsrud M, Stødle A, Trommer A, Ugland S, Karlsten A, Ekås G, Pape HC, Knobe M, Pfeifer R. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97:751-7. [PMID: 25948522 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.n.00542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) has been extensively evaluated in groups of patients with osteoarthritis, yet not in patients with a femoral neck fracture. This study aimed to determine the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the WOMAC compared with the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) questionnaires for the assessment of elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture. METHODS Reliability was tested by assessing the Cronbach alpha. Construct validity was determined with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Change scores were calculated from ten weeks to twelve months of follow-up. Standardized response means and floor and ceiling effects were determined. Analyses were performed to compare the results for patients less than eighty years old with those for patients eighty years of age or older. RESULTS The mean WOMAC total score was 89 points before the fracture in the younger patients and increased from 70 points at ten weeks to 81 points at two years postoperatively. In the older age group, these scores were 86, 75, and 78 points. The mean WOMAC pain scores before the fracture and at ten weeks and two years postoperatively were 92, 76, and 87 points, respectively, in the younger age group and 92, 84, and 93 points in the older age group. Function scores were 89, 68, and 79 points for the younger age group and 84, 71, and 73 points for the older age group. The Cronbach alpha for pain, stiffness, function, and the total scale ranged from 0.83 to 0.98 for the younger age group and from 0.79 to 0.97 for the older age group. Construct validity was good, with 82% and 79% of predefined hypotheses confirmed in the younger and older age groups, respectively. Responsiveness was moderate. No floor effects were found. Moderate to large ceiling effects were found for pain and stiffness scales at ten weeks and twelve months in younger patients (18% to 36%) and in the older age group (38% to 53%). CONCLUSIONS The WOMAC showed good reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness in both age groups of elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture who had been physically and mentally fit before the fracture. The instrument is suitable for use in future clinical studies in these populations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The results are based on two clinical trials. The questionnaires used concern pure, clinically relevant issues (ability to walk, climb stairs, etc.). Moreover, the results can be used for future research comparing clinical outcomes (or treatments) for populations with a femoral neck fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul T P W Burgers
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address for P.T.P.W. Burgers: . E-mail address for T.M.J. Van Bakel: . E-mail address for W.E. Tuinebreijer: . E-mail address for S.M. Zielinski: . E-mail address for E.M.M. Van Lieshout:
| | - Rudolf W Poolman
- Joint Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, P.O. Box 95500, 1090 HM Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address:
| | - Theodorus M J Van Bakel
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address for P.T.P.W. Burgers: . E-mail address for T.M.J. Van Bakel: . E-mail address for W.E. Tuinebreijer: . E-mail address for S.M. Zielinski: . E-mail address for E.M.M. Van Lieshout:
| | - Wim E Tuinebreijer
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address for P.T.P.W. Burgers: . E-mail address for T.M.J. Van Bakel: . E-mail address for W.E. Tuinebreijer: . E-mail address for S.M. Zielinski: . E-mail address for E.M.M. Van Lieshout:
| | - Stephanie M Zielinski
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address for P.T.P.W. Burgers: . E-mail address for T.M.J. Van Bakel: . E-mail address for W.E. Tuinebreijer: . E-mail address for S.M. Zielinski: . E-mail address for E.M.M. Van Lieshout:
| | - Mohit Bhandari
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, HSC 2C, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada. E-mail address:
| | - Peter Patka
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address:
| | - Esther M M Van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address for P.T.P.W. Burgers: . E-mail address for T.M.J. Van Bakel: . E-mail address for W.E. Tuinebreijer: . E-mail address for S.M. Zielinski: . E-mail address for E.M.M. Van Lieshout:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
van den Boom AL, Gorter RR, van Haard PMM, Doornebosch PG, Heij HA, Dawson I. The impact of disease severity, age and surgical approach on the outcome of acute appendicitis in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2015; 31:339-45. [PMID: 25687156 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-015-3677-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/03/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although a national guideline has been implemented, the optimal approach for appendectomy in children remains subject of debate in the Netherlands. Opponents of laparoscopy raise their concerns regarding its use in complex appendicitis as it is reported to be associated with an increased incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of surgical approaches in both simple and complex appendicitis in paediatric patients. METHODS A 10-year retrospective cohort study was performed (2001-2010) in paediatric patients treated for suspected acute appendicitis. Patients were divided into either simple or complex appendicitis and into different age groups. Primary outcome parameters were complication rate (intra-abdominal abscess (IAA), superficial surgical site infection (SSI) and readmission) and hospital stay. RESULTS In total, 878 patients have been treated (median age 12, range 0-17 years). Two-thirds of the patients younger than 6 years had complex appendicitis, compared to one quarter in the group aged 13-18. In the complex appendicitis group, LA was associated with more IAA and early readmissions. In the simple appendicitis group, the complication rate was comparable between the two approaches. Significantly more IAAs were seen after LA in the youngest age group. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the unfavourable outcome of LA in the youngest age group and in patients with complex appendicitis. Therefore, we advise to treat these patients with an open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L van den Boom
- Surgery, IJsselland ziekenhuis, Pr Constantijnweg 2, 2906 ZC, Capelle aan den ijssel, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Verseveld M, Barendse RM, Dawson I, Vos EL, de Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG. Intramucosal carcinoma of the rectum can be safely treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery; clinical support of the revised Vienna classification. Surg Endosc 2014; 28:3210-5. [PMID: 24939156 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3593-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2013] [Accepted: 05/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
AIM The revised Vienna criteria were proposed for classifying rectal neoplasia and subsequent treatment strategies. Restaging intramucosal carcinoma to a non-invasive subgroup seems logical, but clinical support is lacking. In this study, we investigated whether distinction between intramucosal carcinomas (IMC) and rectal adenoma (RA) is of clinical relevance and whether these neoplasms can all be similarly and safely treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). METHODS All consecutive patients with IMC and RA, treated with TEM between 1996 and 2010 in tertiary referral centre for TEM were included. Long-term outcome of 88 IMC was compared to 356 pure rectal adenomas (RA). Local recurrence (LR) rate was the primary endpoint. Risk factors for LR were analysed. RESULTS LR was diagnosed in 7/88 patients (8.0 %) with IMC and in 33/356 patients with primary RA (9.3 %; p = 0.700) and LR-free survival did not differ (p = 0.438). Median time to recurrence was 10 months (IQR IMC 5-30; RA 6-16). Overall recurrence occurred mainly in the first 3 years (38/40; 95 %). None of the LR revealed malignancy on pathological evaluation. No differences could be found in complication rates (IMC 9 %; RA 13 %; p = 0.34). Metastases did not occur in either group. Independent risk factors for LR were irradical margins at final histopathology (HR 2.32; 95 % CI 1.17-4.59; p = 0.016) and more proximal tumours (HR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.77-0.92; P = <0.001). CONCLUSION In this study, IMC of the rectum and RA have similar recurrence rates. This supports the revised Vienna classification. Both entities can be safely treated with TEM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Verseveld
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, P.O. Box 960, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
van Gijn W, Brehm V, de Graaf E, Neijenhuis PA, Stassen LPS, Leijtens JWA, Van De Velde CJH, Doornebosch PG. Unexpected rectal cancer after TEM: outcome of completion surgery compared with primary TME. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39:1225-9. [PMID: 23972571 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2013] [Revised: 07/27/2013] [Accepted: 08/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has gained wide-spread acceptance as a safe and useful technique for the resection of rectal adenomas and selected T1 malignant lesions. If the lesion appears >T1 rectal cancer after resection with TEM, a completion TME resection is recommended. The aim of this study was to investigate the results of TME surgery after TEM for rectal cancer. METHODS In four tertiary referral hospitals for TEM, all patients with completion TME surgery after initial TEM were selected. All eligible patients who were treated with 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy followed by TME surgery from the Dutch TME trial were selected as reference group. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratio's (OR) for colostomies and for colo- and ileostomies combined. Local recurrence and survival rates were compared in hazard ratio's (HR) using the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS Fifty-nine patients were included in the TEM-COMPLETION group and 881 patients from the TME trial. In the TEM-COMPLETION group, 50.8% of the patients had a colostomy compared to 45.9% in the TME trial, OR 2.51 (p < 0.006). There is no significant difference when ileo- and colostomies are analyzed together. In the TEM-COMPLETION group, 10.2% developed a local recurrence compared to 5.2% in the TME trial, HR 6.8 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Completion TME surgery after TEM for unexpected rectal adenocarcinoma results in more colostomies and higher local recurrence rates compared to one stage TME surgery preceded with preoperative 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy. Pre-operative investigations must be optimized to distinguish malignant and benign lesions and prevent avoidable local recurrence and colostomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W van Gijn
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Surgery Department, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bökkerink GMJ, de Graaf EJR, Punt CJA, Nagtegaal ID, Rütten H, Nuyttens JJME, van Meerten E, Doornebosch PG, Tanis PJ, Derksen EJ, Dwarkasing RS, Marijnen CAM, Cats A, Tollenaar RAEM, de Hingh IHJT, Rutten HJT, van der Schelling GP, Ten Tije AJ, Leijtens JWA, Lammering G, Beets GL, Aufenacker TJ, Pronk A, Manusama ER, Hoff C, Bremers AJA, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW. The CARTS study: Chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer in the distal rectum followed by organ-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery. BMC Surg 2011; 11:34. [PMID: 22171697 PMCID: PMC3295682 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2011] [Accepted: 12/15/2011] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The CARTS study is a multicenter feasibility study, investigating the role of rectum saving surgery for distal rectal cancer. Methods/Design Patients with a clinical T1-3 N0 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma below 10 cm from the anal verge will receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (25 fractions of 2 Gy with concurrent capecitabine). Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) will be performed 8 - 10 weeks after the end of the preoperative treatment depending on the clinical response. Primary objective is to determine the number of patients with a (near) complete pathological response after chemoradiation therapy and TEM. Secondary objectives are the local recurrence rate and quality of life after this combined therapeutic modality. A three-step analysis will be performed after 20, 33 and 55 patients to ensure the feasibility of this treatment protocol. Discussion The CARTS-study is one of the first prospective multicentre trials to investigate the role of a rectum saving treatment modality using chemoradiation therapy and local excision. The CARTS study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01273051)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guus M J Bökkerink
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Grünhagen DJ, van Ierland MCP, Doornebosch PG, Bruijninckx MMM, Winograd R, de Graaf EJR. Laparoscopic-monitored colonoscopic polypectomy: a multimodality method to avoid segmental colon resection. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13:1280-4. [PMID: 21091600 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02515.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM In some patients with adenoma, snare polypectomy may be technically impossible owing to angulation of the colon or after previous surgery. This may result in a segmental colonic resection, if malignant invasion is thought to be likely. Laparoscopic mobilization of the colon to enable a simultaneous colonoscopy can avoid this difficulty. METHOD A feasibility study was performed in 11 patients for whom endoscopic removal was technically impossible due to fibrosis after previous surgery or to anatomical difficulty. In 10, adenoma (histologically benign) had been diagnosed during diagnostic colonoscopy and in the remaining patient the indication was rectal bleeding. RESULTS It was possible to perform a full colonoscopy after laparoscopic mobilization in all cases. In nine of the 10 patients with adenoma 11 tubulovillous adenomas were removed endoscopically, and in one the tumour was too large for endoscopic resection even after full mobilization. A laparoscopic segmental resection was performed in this case. In the patient with rectal bleeding, colonoscopy revealed an angiodysplasia of the caecum, also treated by resection. Apart from the two patients having resection, all patients were discharged within 24 h of the procedure. During endoscopic follow up (4-27 months) there were no recurrences. CONCLUSIONS Combined laparoscopy and endoscopy enabled removal of adenomas otherwise inaccessible for endoscopic techniques. Thus, segmental colon resections can be avoided in most of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle a/d IJssel, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Doornebosch PG, Zeestraten E, de Graaf EJR, Hermsen P, Dawson I, Tollenaar RAEM, Morreau H. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 rectal cancer: size matters! Surg Endosc 2011; 26:551-7. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1918-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2011] [Accepted: 08/22/2011] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
39
|
Doornebosch PG, Ferenschild FTJ, de Wilt JHW, Dawson I, Tetteroo GWM, de Graaf EJR. Treatment of recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53:1234-9. [PMID: 20706065 DOI: 10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181e73f33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the management and outcome of local recurrences after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 rectal cancer. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery for pT1 rectal cancer at a Dutch referral center (IJsselland Hospital) were registered in a prospective database. Follow-up was according to Dutch guidelines on rectal cancer, with additional rigid rectoscopy and endorectal ultrasound examinations every 3 months for the first 2 years, and every 6 months thereafter. Annual MRI of the lesser pelvis was added during the last 2 years of the study. Patients with local recurrence during follow-up were selected for individual analysis of outcome. RESULTS Of a total of 88 patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery for pT1 rectal cancer, 18 patients (20.5%) had a local recurrence. Median time to local recurrence was 10 (range, 4-50) months. Median age at diagnosis of recurrence was 74 (range, 56-84) years. Of the 18 patients, 2 did not undergo further surgery because of concomitant metastatic disease, and 16 underwent salvage surgery, without need for multivisceral resections. No postoperative mortality was observed. In 15 patients (94%), a microscopically negative excision margin was obtained; in 1 patient, the excision margin was microscopically positive. Median follow-up after salvage surgery was 20 (range, 2-112) months. One patient had a local renewal of recurrence, and 7 patients (39%) had distant metastases. At 3 years, overall survival was 31%; cancer-related survival was 58%. CONCLUSIONS Recurrent disease after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 rectal cancer is a major problem. Although salvage surgery for achieving local control is feasible in most patients, survival is limited, mainly because of distant metastases. Tailoring selection of T1 rectal cancers and exploring possible adjuvant treatment strategies following salvage procedures should be the next steps toward improving survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle a/d IJssel, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hermsen PEA, Nonner J, De Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG. Recurrences after transanal excision or transanal endoscopic microsurgery of T1 rectal cancer. MINERVA CHIR 2010; 65:213-223. [PMID: 20548276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Local excision for T1 rectal cancer is increasingly applied, in a strive to avoid the morbidity associated with radical surgery, despite limited evidence. One of the issues is the high rate of local recurrence following local excision (LE). In this article we focus on this item and review the literature articles concerning local excision and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), recurrence, and salvage surgery. Local recurrence rates after LE or TEM are unacceptably high. As outcome of this subgroup is limited, future studies should focus on proper tumor selection and adjuvant treatment strategies following salvage surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P E A Hermsen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Burger JWAP, Eddes EH, Gerhards MF, Doornebosch PG, de Graaf EJR. [Two new treatments for haemorrhoids. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation and stapled anopexy]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2010; 154:A787. [PMID: 20132567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Haemorrhoids occur in approximately 30% of the population. Commonly occurring complaints include blood loss, pruritus, hygiene problems and soiling. A high-fibre diet, with dietary-fiber supplementation if required, often resolves the symptoms. When symptoms are not resolved, the next step is rubber band ligation: a safe and easy procedure. In the long term, the result of rubber band ligation is often unsatisfactory. Haemorrhoidectomy was formerly the only alternative. Haemorrhoidectomy can be accompanied by serious complications, such as disabling pain and incontinence. Haemorrhoidectomy was therefore considered obsolete by the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement (CBO) guideline of 1994. Today new operative procedures are available: Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) and stapled anopexy. Both techniques are safe and yield good results. Moreover, these techniques cause little postoperative pain. DG-HAL and stapled anopexy offer an alternative for patients whose symptoms are not resolved by dietary-fiber supplementation and rubber band ligation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W A Pim Burger
- IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, Afd. Heelkunde, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
De Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG, Tollenaar RAEM, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, de Boer AC, Bekkering FC, van de Velde CJH. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus total mesorectal excision of T1 rectal adenocarcinomas with curative intention. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35:1280-5. [PMID: 19487099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2009] [Revised: 05/04/2009] [Accepted: 05/06/2009] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE After total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, pathology is standardized with margin status as a predictor for recurrence. This has yet to be implemented after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and was investigated prospectively for T1 rectal adenocarcinomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty patients after TEM were compared to 75 patients after TME. The study protocol included standardized pathology. TEM patients were eligible when excision margins were negative. RESULTS TEM was safer than TME as reflected by operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, morbidity, re-operation rate and stoma formation (all P<0.001). Mortality after TEM was 0% and after TME 4%. At 5 years after TEM and TME, both overall survival (TEM 75% versus TME 77%, P=0.9) and cancer-specific survival (TEM 90% versus TME 87%, P=0.5) were comparable. Local recurrence rate after TEM was 24% and after TME 0% (HR 79.266, 95% CI, 1.208 to 5202, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION For T1 rectal adenocarcinomas TEM is much saver than TME and survival is comparable. After TEM local recurrence rate is substantial, despite negative excision margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J R De Graaf
- Department of General Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, PO Box 690, 2900 AR, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Doornebosch PG, Tollenaar RAEM, De Graaf EJR. Is the increasing role of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery in curation for T1 rectal cancer justified? A systematic review. Acta Oncol 2009; 48:343-53. [PMID: 18855161 DOI: 10.1080/02841860802342408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Driven by the aim to avoid a permanent colostomy and also the morbidity and mortality of major radical surgery for rectal cancer, the proportion of patients with rectal cancer treated by local excision has increased the last ten years or so. In T1 carcinomas local excision is considered a curative option in selected tumors. However, the scientific base upon which this treatment regimen is built remains controversial. In this systematic review we try to elucidate current literature regarding local excision for T1 rectal carcinomas. Several questions are addressed. First, is there enough evidence to propagate LE as a curative option in selected (T1) rectal carcinomas? Second, if LE is justified, which technique should be the method of choice? Third, can we adequately identify, pre- and postoperatively, tumors suitable for LE? Finally, future perspectives are discussed.
Collapse
|
44
|
van den Broek FJC, de Graaf EJR, Dijkgraaf MGW, Reitsma JB, Haringsma J, Timmer R, Weusten BLAM, Gerhards MF, Consten ECJ, Schwartz MP, Boom MJ, Derksen EJ, Bijnen AB, Davids PHP, Hoff C, van Dullemen HM, Heine GDN, van der Linde K, Jansen JM, Mallant-Hent RCH, Breumelhof R, Geldof H, Hardwick JCH, Doornebosch PG, Depla ACTM, Ernst MF, van Munster IP, de Hingh IHJT, Schoon EJ, Bemelman WA, Fockens P, Dekker E. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND-study). BMC Surg 2009; 9:4. [PMID: 19284647 PMCID: PMC2664790 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-9-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2009] [Accepted: 03/13/2009] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recent non-randomized studies suggest that extended endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is equally effective in removing large rectal adenomas as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). If equally effective, EMR might be a more cost-effective approach as this strategy does not require expensive equipment, general anesthesia and hospital admission. Furthermore, EMR appears to be associated with fewer complications. The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of TEM and EMR for the resection of large rectal adenomas. Methods/design Multicenter randomized trial among 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with a rectal adenoma ≥ 3 cm, located between 1–15 cm ab ano, will be randomized to a TEM- or EMR-treatment strategy. For TEM, patients will be treated under general anesthesia, adenomas will be dissected en-bloc by a full-thickness excision, and patients will be admitted to the hospital. For EMR, no or conscious sedation is used, lesions will be resected through the submucosal plane in a piecemeal fashion, and patients will be discharged from the hospital. Residual adenoma that is visible during the first surveillance endoscopy at 3 months will be removed endoscopically in both treatment strategies and is considered as part of the primary treatment. Primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients with recurrence after 3 months. Secondary outcome measures are: 2) number of days not spent in hospital from initial treatment until 2 years afterwards; 3) major and minor morbidity; 4) disease specific and general quality of life; 5) anorectal function; 6) health care utilization and costs. A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of EMR against TEM for large rectal adenomas will be performed from a societal perspective with respectively the costs per recurrence free patient and the cost per quality adjusted life year as outcome measures. Based on comparable recurrence rates for TEM and EMR of 3.3% and considering an upper-limit of 10% for EMR to be non-inferior (beta-error 0.2 and one-sided alpha-error 0.05), 89 patients are needed per group. Discussion The TREND study is the first randomized trial evaluating whether TEM or EMR is more cost-effective for the treatment of large rectal adenomas. Trial registration number (trialregister.nl) NTR1422
Collapse
|
45
|
Lips EH, van Eijk R, de Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, de Miranda NF, Oosting J, Karsten T, Eilers PH, Tollenaar RA, van Wezel T, Morreau H. Progression and Tumor Heterogeneity Analysis in Early Rectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14:772-81. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-2052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
46
|
Doornebosch PG, Bronkhorst PJB, Hop WCJ, Bode WA, Sing AK, de Graaf EJR. The role of endorectal ultrasound in therapeutic decision-making for local vs. transabdominal resection of rectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51:38-42. [PMID: 18038181 DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9104-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2007] [Revised: 04/14/2007] [Accepted: 07/03/2007] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In rectal tumors, preoperative biopsies frequently fail to diagnose an invasive carcinoma. Endorectal ultrasound is considered a useful adjunct in preoperative staging of rectal tumors. However, feasibility of endorectal ultrasound and its role in therapeutic decision-making in presumed rectal adenomas is sparsely studied. METHODS Endorectal ultrasound was performed in 268 tumors referred for local excision because biopsies showed tubulovillous adenoma. Feasibility of endorectal ultrasound was studied and ultrasound staging was compared with definite histopathologic findings. RESULTS In 231 tumors, endorectal ultrasound was technically feasible (86 percent). Median distance from the dentate line was 11 cm in nonassessable tumors and 7 cm in assessable tumors (P < 0.001). In 21 tumors, endorectal ultrasound was not conclusive, mainly in tumors being recurrent or after recent endoscopic manipulation (P < 0.001). With endorectal ultrasound the rate of preoperative missed carcinomas could be reduced from 21 to 3 percent (P < 0.01). In diagnosing tubulovillous adenomas, sensitivity and specificity of endorectal ultrasound was 89 and 86 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Endorectal ultrasound is technically feasible in almost all presumed rectal adenomas, referred for local excision. Proper endorectal ultrasound interpretation is possible in 78 percent of all presumed rectal adenomas. Endorectal ultrasound is very reliable in diagnosing tubulovillous adenomas, and therapeutic decision-making regarding local excision vs. radical surgery based on endorectal ultrasound is valid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Centre, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Doornebosch PG, Tollenaar RAEM, Gosselink MP, Stassen LP, Dijkhuis CM, Schouten WR, van de Velde CJ, de Graaf EJR. Quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and total mesorectal excision in early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9:553-8. [PMID: 17573752 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01186.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard in rectal cancer, if curation is intended. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a much safer technique and seems to have comparable survival in early rectal cancer. The impact of both procedures on quality of life has never been compared. In this study we compared quality of life after TEM and TME. METHOD Fifty-four patients underwent TEM for a T1 carcinoma. Only patients without known locoregional or distant recurrences were included, resulting in 36 eligible patients in whom quality of life after TEM was studied. The questionnaires used included the EuroQol EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR38. The results were compared with a sex-and age-matched sample of T+N0 rectal cancer patients who had undergone sphincter saving surgery by TME and a sex- and age matched community-based sample of healthy persons. RESULTS Thirty-one patients after TEM returned completed questionnaires (overall response rate 86%). Quality of life was compared with 31 TME patients and 31 healthy controls. From the patients' and social perspective quality of life did not differ between the three groups. Compared with TEM, significant defecation problems were seen after TME (P < 0.05). A trend towards better sexual functioning after TEM, compared with TME, was seen, especially in male patients, although it did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and TME do not seem to differ in quality of life postoperatively, but defecation disorders are more frequently encountered after TME. This difference could play a role in the choice of surgical therapy in (early) rectal cancer. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm our conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
We present the case of a 54-year old woman who presented twice at our emergency department with progressive abdominal pain. Over the last few years, multiple short periods of abdominal pain had occurred: the pain always resolved spontaneously after a few hours. She had no past medical history. CT scan revealed a sac-like mass of small bowel loops to the left of the ligament of Treitz, consistent with the diagnosis of a left paraduodenal hernia. On laparotomy, a left paraduodenal hernia with incarceration of small bowel loops was found; the herniated loops were reduced and the hernia orifice closed. The anatomy, treatment and importance of considering this uncommon diagnosis when examining a patient with acute small bowel obstruction are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Brehm
- Department of Surgery, Rijnland Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
If curation is intended for rectal cancer, total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation (TME) is the gold standard. Transanal resection is tempting because of low mortality and morbidity rates. However, inferior tumour control, provoked by the limitations of the technique, resulted in its cautious application and use mainly for palliation. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimal invasive technique for the local resection of rectal tumours. It is a one-port system, introduced transanally. An optical system with a 3D-view, 6-fold magnification and resolution as the human eye, together with the creation of a stabile pneumorectum, and specially designed instruments allow full-thickness excision under excellent view and a proper histological examination. The technique can also be applied for larger and more proximal tumours. Mortality, morbidity as well as incomplete excision rates are minimal. Local recurrence and survival rates seem comparable to TME in early rectal cancer. TEM is the method of choice when local resection of rectal cancer is indicated. Results justify a re-evaluation of the indications for the local excision of rectal cancer with a curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J R de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Doornebosch PG, Tetteroo GW, Geldof H, de Graaf EJ. [Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a good choice for local resection of rectal tumors]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1998; 142:2577-81. [PMID: 10028355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), a minimal access technique for the local resection of rectal tumours. DESIGN Prospective. SETTING IJsselland Hospital, Capelle a/d IJssel, the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHOD TEM was performed in all patients between January 1996 and December 1997 with a rectal adenoma that could not be removed endoscopically, or with a rectal carcinoma and poor general condition which allowed no transabdominal surgery. TEM involves air insufflation and endosurgical resection of the tumour under direct vision. RESULTS In all 11 tumours within approximately 4 cm from the linea anorectalis conversion was necessary due to technical problems and 1 tumour could not be visualized because of a stenosis. In all 23 other tumours TEM was performed. Mean distance from the linea anorectalis was 6.9 cm (4-12), with a mean surface of the base of the tumour of 7.7 cm2 (1-30). Mean operating time was 76 minutes (10-180). In one tumour the defect could not be completely closed, and conversion was necessary. Postoperatively one suture dehiscence and one urinary tract infection occurred. None of the patients had functional disorders. Every specimen contained all bowel layers, and in all but one, the margins were free of tumour. In 13 tumours an adenoma was diagnosed and in 10, a carcinoma. In 2 patients with carcinoma additional resection was performed. Mean follow-up was 9 months (1-23), and concerned 21 tumours. No recurrence has been observed. CONCLUSION TEM is a good method for the local resection of rectal tumours, when located more than 4 cm from the linea anorectalis. Radical resection, containing all bowel layers, is possible, and has, as it appears, a low recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P G Doornebosch
- Afd. Algemene Heelkunde, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|