1
|
Demirci H, van der Storm SL, Huizing NJ, Fräser M, Stufkens SAS, Krips R, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Barsom EZ, Schijven MP. Watching a movie or listening to music is effective in managing perioperative anxiety and pain: a randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:6069-6079. [PMID: 37897624 PMCID: PMC10719121 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07629-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the use of perioperative anxiolytics and pain medication, surgery can be a stressful and painful experience. Providing patients with distractions using video and/or audio tools in addition to medication may be helpful. To date, no studies have compared different distraction modalities in a same-day surgical setting in adults. This study aims to determine whether audio-visual distraction with video glasses (AVD) is more effective in reducing anxiety and pain compared to audio distraction (AD) in conscious patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. It was hypothesised that AVD, being the more immersive modality, would be more effective than AD on the outcome parameters. METHODS Fifty patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery with local and/or regional anaesthesia in a clinical day-care setting were randomly assigned to receive either fixed-scenery AVD or patient-choice AD with music. Primary outcome was anxiety, as measured by the Dutch version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 (STAI-6) prior to and 15 min after the intervention. Secondary outcomes were pain (Numeric Rating Scale Pain [NRS-P]), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and patient satisfaction. RESULTS Within each group, there was a significant reduction in anxiety (p = 0.028 for AVD, p < 0.001 for AD). In contrast to our hypothesis, listening to music without watching a video (AD group) reduced anxiety significantly more than experiencing full AVD (p = 0.018). The mean pain score did not change significantly within either user group, nor did pain scores differ between user groups. CONCLUSION In conscious patients undergoing surgery, watching a movie (using video glasses and a headphone set) and listening to music (using only a headphone set) are able to significantly reduce anxiety. AVD, although believed to provide higher levels of distraction, did not prove to be superior to AD. The clinical relevance of this study highlights the potential benefits of AVD or AD modalities in improving the surgical experience for conscious patients. Further research is required to examine the influence of freedom of choice in content on the aforementioned outcomes. To estimate the true value of higher immersion levels, different distraction modalities (e.g. AVD versus virtual reality) featuring the exact same scenery or content need to be compared. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hafize Demirci
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sebastiaan L van der Storm
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nathalie J Huizing
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Morgianne Fräser
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd A S Stufkens
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Academic Center for Evidence-Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), AMC/VUmc IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rover Krips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Academic Center for Evidence-Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), AMC/VUmc IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Z Barsom
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies P Schijven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paget LD, Reurink G, de Vos RJ, Weir A, Moen MH, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Stufkens SA, Goedegebuure S, Krips R, Maas M, Meuffels DE, Nolte PA, Runhaar J, Kerkhoffs GM, Tol JL. Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for the Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:2625-2634. [PMID: 37417359 PMCID: PMC10394962 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231182438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ankle osteoarthritis is debilitating and usually affects relatively young people, often as a result of previous ankle traumas, frequently occurring in sports. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for ankle osteoarthritis have shown no evidence of benefit over the course of 26 weeks. Previous studies on PRP for knee osteoarthritis showed that clinically significant improvements with PRP occurred between 6 to 12 months in the absence of initial benefit. No studies have evaluated the effect of PRP from 6 to 12 months in ankle osteoarthritis. PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of PRP injections in ankle osteoarthritis over the course of 52 weeks. STUDY DESIGN Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS In this 52-week follow-up trial, 100 patients with ankle osteoarthritis were randomized to a PRP group or placebo (saline) group. Patients received 2 intra-articular talocrural injections: at inclusion and after 6 weeks. Patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess pain, function, quality of life, and indirect costs over 52 weeks. RESULTS Two patients (2%) were lost to follow-up. The adjusted between-group difference for the patient-reported American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score over 52 weeks was -2 points (95% CI, -5 to 2; P = .31) in favor of the placebo group. No significant between-group differences were observed for any of the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSION For patients with ankle osteoarthritis, PRP injections did not improve ankle symptoms and function over 52 weeks compared with placebo injections. REGISTRATION NTR7261 (Netherlands Trial Register).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam D.A. Paget
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports Medicine [ACES], Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports [ACHSS], AMC/VUmc IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gustaaf Reurink
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ACES, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ACHSS, AMC/VUmc IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; The Sport Physician Group, Department of Sports Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert-Jan de Vos
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adam Weir
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Aspetar Sports Groin Pain Centre, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Hospital, Doha, Qatar; Sport Medicine and Exercise Clinic Haarlem [SBK], Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten H. Moen
- The Sport Physician Group, Department of Sports Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Sports Medicine, Bergman Clinics, Naarden, the Netherlands
| | - Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd A.S. Stufkens
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ACES, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ACHSS, AMC/VUmc IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simon Goedegebuure
- The Sport Physician Group, Department of Sports Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rover Krips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, the Netherlands
| | - Mario Maas
- ACES, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ACHSS, AMC/VUmc IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Duncan E. Meuffels
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter A. Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands; Department of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam [ACTA], UvA and VU, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J. Runhaar
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ACES, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ACHSS, AMC/VUmc IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes L. Tol
- ACES, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ACHSS, AMC/VUmc IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Aspetar, Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar
- Investigation performed at Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tilbury C, Leichtenberg CS, Kaptein BL, Koster LA, Verdegaal SHM, Onstenk R, der Zwaag HMJVDLV, Krips R, Kaptijn HH, Vehmeijer SBW, Marijnissen WJCM, Meesters JJL, van Rooden SM, Brand R, Nelissen RGHH, Gademan MGJ, Vlieland TPMV. Feasibility of Collecting Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. J Patient Exp 2020; 7:484-492. [PMID: 33062868 PMCID: PMC7534142 DOI: 10.1177/2374373519853166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Compliance rates with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected alongside arthroplasty registries vary in the literature. We described the feasibility of a routinely collected set PROMs alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Methods: The longitudinal Leiden Orthopaedics Outcomes of OsteoArthritis Study is a multicenter (7 hospitals), observational study including patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). A set of PROMs: Short Form-12, EuroQol 5 Dimensions, Hip/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Oxford Hip/Knee Score was collected preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24 months, and every 2 years thereafter. Participation rates and response rates were recorded. Results: Between June 2012 and December 2014, 1796 THA and 1636 TKA patients were invited, of whom 1043 THA (58%; mean age 68 years [standard deviation, SD: 10]) and 970 TKA patients (59%; mean age 71 years [SD 9.5]) participated in the study. At 6 months, 35 THA/38 TKA patients were lost to follow-up. Response rates were 90% for THA (898/1000) and 89% for TKA (827/932) participants. At 1 and 2 years, 8 and 18 THA and 17 and 11 TKA patients were lost to follow-up, respectively. The response rates among those eligible were 87% (866/992) and 84% (812/972) for THA and 84% (771/917) and 83% (756/906) for TKA patients, respectively. The 2-year questionnaire was completed by 78.5% of the included THA patients and by 77.9% of the included TKA patients. Conclusions: About 60% of patients undergoing THA or TKA complete PROMs preoperatively, with more than 80% returning follow-up PROMs. To increase the participation rates, more efforts concerning the initial recruitment of patients are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Tilbury
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bart L Kaptein
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lennard A Koster
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Suzan H M Verdegaal
- Department of Orthopaedics, Alrijne Ziekenhuis Leiderdorp, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
| | - Ron Onstenk
- Department of Orthopaedics, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rover Krips
- Department of Orthopaedics, Alrijne Ziekenhuis Leiderdorp, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
| | - Herman H Kaptijn
- Department of Orthopaedics, LangeLand Ziekenhuis, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jorit J L Meesters
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie M van Rooden
- Department of Advanced Data Management, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald Brand
- Department of Advanced Data Management, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rob G H H Nelissen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike G J Gademan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Thea P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Basalt Rehabilitation, Leiden/The Hague, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paget L, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Goedegebuure S, Kerkhoffs G, Krips R, Maas M, Moen MH, Reurink G, Stufkens S, de Vos RJ, Weir A, Tol JL. Platelet-Rich plasma Injection Management for Ankle osteoarthritis study (PRIMA): protocol of a Dutch multicentre, stratified, block-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030961. [PMID: 31594891 PMCID: PMC6797250 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a potentially efficacious treatment for ankle osteoarthritis (OA), but its use has not been examined in high-quality studies. Systematic reviews show that PRP injections significantly decrease pain and improve function in patients with knee OA. Ankle OA is more common than hip or knee OA in the young active population; with a prevalence of 3.4%.PRP injections in ankle OA are shown to be safe and improve quality of life over time, but no randomised controlled trial has been conducted. Our randomised controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of PRP injections for symptom reduction and functional improvement, compared with placebo, in the treatment of ankle (talocrural) OA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct the Platelet-Rich plasma Injection Management for Ankle OA study: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. One hundred patients suffering from ankle OA will be randomised into two treatment groups: PRP injection or placebo (saline) injection. Both groups will receive two injections of PRP or placebo at an interval of 6 weeks. Primary outcome is the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes determined at several follow-up moments up to 5 years, include Ankle Osteoarthritis Score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, pain subscale of (0-40), Visual Analogue Scale score (0-100), Ankle Activity Score (0-10), subjective patient satisfaction Short Form Health Survey-36, Global Attainment Scaling and the EuroQol-5 dimensions-3 levels utility score. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed at 1 year. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study is approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee Amsterdam Medical Center, the Netherlands (ABR 2018-042, approved 23 July 2018) and registered in the Netherlands trial register (NTR7261). Results and new knowledge will be disseminated through the Dutch Arthritis Association (ReumaNederland), Dutch patient federation, conferences and published in a scientific peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR7261.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lda Paget
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), AMC/VUMC IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sma Bierma-Zeinstra
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Goedegebuure
- Sports Medicine, OLVG, The Sport Physician Group, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gmmj Kerkhoffs
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), AMC/VUMC IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Krips
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - M Maas
- Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology, Amsterdam UMC-Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M H Moen
- Sports Medicine, Bergman Clinics, Naarden, The Netherlands
- OLVG, The Sport Physician Group, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Reurink
- Sports Medicine, OLVG, The Sport Physician Group, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sas Stufkens
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), AMC/VUMC IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J de Vos
- Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Weir
- Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Sports Medicine and Exercise Clinic Haarlem (SBK), Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - J L Tol
- Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vuurberg G, Hoorntje A, Wink LM, van der Doelen BFW, van den Bekerom MP, Dekker R, van Dijk CN, Krips R, Loogman MCM, Ridderikhof ML, Smithuis FF, Stufkens SAS, Verhagen EALM, de Bie RA, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of ankle sprains: update of an evidence-based clinical guideline. Br J Sports Med 2018. [PMID: 29514819 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This guideline aimed to advance current understandings regarding the diagnosis, prevention and therapeutic interventions for ankle sprains by updating the existing guideline and incorporate new research. A secondary objective was to provide an update related to the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic procedures, therapeutic interventions and prevention strategies. It was posited that subsequent interaction of clinicians with this guideline could help reduce health impairments and patient burden associated with this prevalent musculoskeletal injury. The previous guideline provided evidence that the severity of ligament damage can be assessed most reliably by delayed physical examination (4-5 days post trauma). After correct diagnosis, it can be stated that even though a short time of immobilisation may be helpful in relieving pain and swelling, the patient with an acute lateral ankle ligament rupture benefits most from use of tape or a brace in combination with an exercise programme.New in this update: Participation in certain sports is associated with a heightened risk of sustaining a lateral ankle sprain. Care should be taken with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) usage after an ankle sprain. They may be used to reduce pain and swelling, but usage is not without complications and NSAIDs may suppress the natural healing process. Concerning treatment, supervised exercise-based programmes preferred over passive modalities as it stimulates the recovery of functional joint stability. Surgery should be reserved for cases that do not respond to thorough and comprehensive exercise-based treatment. For the prevention of recurrent lateral ankle sprains, ankle braces should be considered as an efficacious option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwendolyn Vuurberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Academic Center for Evidence Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), VUmc / AMC IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Hoorntje
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Academic Center for Evidence Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), VUmc / AMC IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lauren M Wink
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,VU Medical Center, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brent F W van der Doelen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Academic Center for Evidence Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), VUmc / AMC IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rienk Dekker
- Dutch Society of Rehabilitation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - C Niek van Dijk
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Academic Center for Evidence Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), VUmc / AMC IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rover Krips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Frank F Smithuis
- Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd A S Stufkens
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evert A L M Verhagen
- Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), VUmc / AMC IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,VU Medical Center, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of of Public and Occupational Health VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob A de Bie
- Department of Epidemiology, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Academic Center for Evidence Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), VUmc / AMC IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capsular shrinkage is an arthroscopic stabilization technique that can be used in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI), if desired in addition to primary arthroscopic procedures. Despite positive short-term results, long-term follow-up of these patients has not yet been performed. Therefore, our objective was to assess whether capsular shrinkage still provided functional outcome after 12-14 years compared to preoperative scores. METHODS This study was a retrospective long-term follow-up of a prospectively conducted longitudinal multicenter trial. The study duration was from February 2002 to September 2016, including a preoperative assessment and short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up. At the time of inclusion, patients were diagnosed with CAI, >18 years old, were unresponsive to conservative treatment, and had confirmed mechanical ankle joint laxity. Patients were excluded if the talar tilt was greater than 15 degrees, if they had received previous operative treatment, or had constitutional hyperlaxity, systemic diseases, or osteoarthritis grade II or III. The primary outcome was the change in functional outcome as assessed by the Karlsson score. RESULTS Twenty-five patients of the initial 39 were available for this follow-up. This group had a mean age of 43.2 years (SD±11.1) and included 15 males. A statistically significant improvement was found in the Karlsson score at 12-14 years (76.6 points; SD±25.5) relative to the preoperative status (56.4 points; SD ±13.3; P < .0005). Although 17 patients (68%) reported recurrent sprains, 23 patients (92%) stated that they were satisfied with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS Despite improved functional outcome and good satisfaction in patients with CAI after capsular shrinkage, recurrence rates and residual symptoms were high. For this reason, arthroscopic capsular shrinkage is not recommended as joint stabilization procedure in patients with CAI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwendolyn Vuurberg
- Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Gwendolyn Vuurberg, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jasper S. de Vries
- Amstelland ziekenhuis, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amstelveen, the Netherlands
| | - Rover Krips
- Flevoziekenhuis, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Almere, the Netherlands
| | - Leendert Blankevoort
- Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alex W.F.M. Fievez
- Medinova clinic, Breda, Amphia hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - C. Niek van Dijk
- Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vuurberg G, de Vries JS, Krips R, Blankevoort L, Fievez AWFM, van Dijk CN. Arthroscopic Capsular Shrinkage for Treatment of Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability. Foot Ankle Int 2017. [PMID: 28745068 DOI: 10.1177/1071100717718139.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capsular shrinkage is an arthroscopic stabilization technique that can be used in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI), if desired in addition to primary arthroscopic procedures. Despite positive short-term results, long-term follow-up of these patients has not yet been performed. Therefore, our objective was to assess whether capsular shrinkage still provided functional outcome after 12-14 years compared to preoperative scores. METHODS This study was a retrospective long-term follow-up of a prospectively conducted longitudinal multicenter trial. The study duration was from February 2002 to September 2016, including a preoperative assessment and short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up. At the time of inclusion, patients were diagnosed with CAI, >18 years old, were unresponsive to conservative treatment, and had confirmed mechanical ankle joint laxity. Patients were excluded if the talar tilt was greater than 15 degrees, if they had received previous operative treatment, or had constitutional hyperlaxity, systemic diseases, or osteoarthritis grade II or III. The primary outcome was the change in functional outcome as assessed by the Karlsson score. RESULTS Twenty-five patients of the initial 39 were available for this follow-up. This group had a mean age of 43.2 years (SD±11.1) and included 15 males. A statistically significant improvement was found in the Karlsson score at 12-14 years (76.6 points; SD±25.5) relative to the preoperative status (56.4 points; SD ±13.3; P < .0005). Although 17 patients (68%) reported recurrent sprains, 23 patients (92%) stated that they were satisfied with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS Despite improved functional outcome and good satisfaction in patients with CAI after capsular shrinkage, recurrence rates and residual symptoms were high. For this reason, arthroscopic capsular shrinkage is not recommended as joint stabilization procedure in patients with CAI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwendolyn Vuurberg
- 1 Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,2 Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,3 Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jasper S de Vries
- 4 Amstelland ziekenhuis, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amstelveen, the Netherlands
| | - Rover Krips
- 5 Flevoziekenhuis, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Almere, the Netherlands
| | - Leendert Blankevoort
- 1 Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alex W F M Fievez
- 6 Medinova clinic, Breda, Amphia hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - C Niek van Dijk
- 1 Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,2 Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,3 Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reilingh ML, van Bergen CJA, Gerards RM, van Eekeren IC, de Haan RJ, Sierevelt IN, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Krips R, Meuffels DE, van Dijk CN, Blankevoort L. Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields After Debridement and Microfracture of Osteochondral Talar Defects: Response. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44:NP61-NP62. [PMID: 27836879 DOI: 10.1177/0363546516676454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
9
|
Reilingh ML, van Bergen CJA, Gerards RM, van Eekeren IC, de Haan RJ, Sierevelt IN, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Krips R, Meuffels DE, van Dijk CN, Blankevoort L. Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Return to Sports After Arthroscopic Debridement and Microfracture of Osteochondral Talar Defects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44:1292-300. [PMID: 26903214 DOI: 10.1177/0363546515626544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteochondral defects (OCDs) of the talus usually affect athletic patients. The primary surgical treatment consists of arthroscopic debridement and microfracture. Various possibilities have been suggested to improve the recovery process after debridement and microfracture. A potential solution to obtain this goal is the application of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs), which stimulate the repair process of bone and cartilage. HYPOTHESIS The use of PEMFs after arthroscopic debridement and microfracture of an OCD of the talus leads to earlier resumption of sports and an increased number of patients that resume sports. STUDY DESIGN Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS A total of 68 patients were randomized to receive either PEMFs (n = 36) or placebo (n = 32) after arthroscopic treatment of an OCD of the talus. The primary outcomes (ie, the number of patients who resumed sports and time to resumption of sports) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves as well as Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and log-rank tests. Secondary functional outcomes were assessed with questionnaires (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, EuroQol, and numeric rating scales for pain and satisfaction) at multiple time points up to 1-year follow-up. To assess bone repair, computed tomography scans were obtained at 2 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS Almost all outcome measures improved significantly in both groups. The percentage of sport resumption (PEMF, 79%; placebo, 80%; P = .95) and median time to sport resumption (PEMF, 17 weeks; placebo, 16 weeks; P = .69) did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. Likewise, there were no significant between-group differences with regard to the secondary functional outcomes and the computed tomography results. CONCLUSION PEMF does not lead to a higher percentage of patients who resume sports or to earlier resumption of sports after arthroscopic debridement and microfracture of talar OCDs. Furthermore, no differences were found in bone repair between groups. REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register NTR1636.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikel L Reilingh
- Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christiaan J A van Bergen
- Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier M Gerards
- Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inge C van Eekeren
- Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rob J de Haan
- Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inger N Sierevelt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
- Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rover Krips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Diaconessenhuis, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Duncan E Meuffels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C N van Dijk
- Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leendert Blankevoort
- Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burgers PTPW, Poolman RW, Van Bakel TMJ, Tuinebreijer WE, Zielinski SM, Bhandari M, Patka P, Van Lieshout EMM, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Einhorn TA, Thabane L, Schemitsch EH, Koval KJ, Frihagen F, Poolman RW, Tetsworth K, Guerra-Farfan E, Walter SD, Sprague S, Swinton M, Scott T, McKay P, Madden K, Heels-Ansdell D, Buckingham L, Duraikannan A, Silva H, Heetveld MJ, Van Lieshout EMM, Burgers PT, Zura RD, Avram V, Manjoo A, Williams D, Antoniou J, Ramsay T, Bogoch ER, Trenholm A, Lyman S, Mazumdar M, Bozic KJ, Luborsky M, Goodman S, Muray S, Korley R, Buckley R, Duffy P, Puloski S, Carcary K, Lorenzo M, McKee MD, Hall JA, Nauth A, Whelan D, Daniels TR, Waddell JP, Ahn H, Vicente MR, Hidy JT, MacNevin MT, Kreder H, Axelrod T, Jenkinson R, Nousiainen M, Stephen D, Wadey V, Kunz M, Milner K, Cagaanan R, MacNevin M, O’Brien PJ, Blachut PA, Broekhuyse HM, Guy P, Lefaivre KA, Slobogean GP, Johal R, Leung I, Coles C, Leighton R, Richardson CG, Biddulph M, Gross M, Dunbar M, Amirault JD, Alexander D, Coady C, Glazebrook M, Johnston D, Oxner W, Reardon G, Wong I, Trask K, MacDonald S, Furey A, Stone C, Parsons M, Stone T, Zomar M, McCormack R, Apostle K, Boyer D, Moola F, Perey B, Viskontas D, Moon K, Moon R, Laflamme Y, Benoit B, Ranger P, Malo M, Fernandes J, Tardif K, Fournier J, Vendittoli PA, Massé V, Roy AG, Lavigne M, Lusignan D, Davis C, Stull P, Weinerman S, Weingarten P, Lindenbaum S, Hewitt M, Danielwicz R, Baker J, Mont M, Delanois DE, Kapadia B, Issa K, Mullen M, Sems A, Foreman B, Parvizi J, Morrison T, Lewis C, Caminiti S, Tornetta P, Creevy WR, Lespasio MJ, Carlisle H, Marcantonio A, Kain M, Specht L, Tilzey J, Garfi J, Mehta S, Esterhai JL, Ahn J, Donegan D, Horan A, McGinnis K, Roberson J, Bradbury T, Erens G, Webb K, Mullis B, Shively K, Parr A, Ertl J, Worman R, Webster M, Cummings J, Frizzell V, Moore M, Jones CB, Ringler JR, Sietsema DL, Walker JE, Kanlic E, Abdelgawad A, Shunia J, DePaolo C, Sutherland S, Alosky R, Zura R, Manson M, Strathy G, Peter K, Johnson P, Morton M, Shaer J, Schrickel T, Hileman B, Hanes M, Chance E, Heinrich EM, Dodgin D, LaBadie M, Zamorano D, Tynan M, Schwarzkopf R, Scolaro JA, Gupta R, Bederman S, Bhatia N, Hoang B, Kiester D, Jones N, Rafijah G, Alavekios D, Lee J, Mehta A, Schroder S, Chao T, Colin V, Dang P(P, Heng SK, Lopez G, Galle S, Pahlavan S, Phan DL, Tapadia M, Bui C, Jain N, Moore T, Moroski N, Pourmand D, Kubiak EN, Gililland J, Rothberg D, Peters C, Pelt C, Stuart AR, Corbey K, Shuler FD, Day J, Garabekyan T, Cheung F, Oliashirazi A, Salava J, Morgan L, Wilson-Byrne T, Cordle MB, Elmans LH, van den Hout JA, Joosten AJP, van Beurden AFA, Bolder SBT, Eygendaal D, Moonen AF, van Geenen RCI, Hoebink EA, Wagenmakers R, van Helden W, van Jonbergen HPW, Roerdink H, Reuver JM, Barnaart AFW, Flikweert ER, Krips R, Mullers JB, Schüller H, Falke MLM, Kurek FJ, Slingerland ACH, van Dijk JP, van Helden WH, Bolhuis HW, Bullens PHJ, Hogervorst M, de Kroon KE, Jansen RH, Steenstra F, Raven EEJ, Fontijne WPJ, Wiersma SC, Boetes B, ten Holder EJT, van der Heide HJL, Nagels J, van der Linden-van der Zwaag EH, Keizer SB, Swen JWA, den Hollander PHC, Thomassen BJW, Molekamp WJK, de Meulemeester FR, Kleipool AEB, Haverlag R, Simons MP, Mutsaerts EL, Kooijman R, Postema RR, Bleker RJ, Lampe HIH, Schuman L, Cheung J, van Bommel F, Winia WP, Haverkamp D, van der Vis H, Nolte PA, van den Bekerom MPJ, de Jong T, van Noort A, Vergroesen DA, Schutte BG, van der Vis HM, Beimers L, de Vries J, Zurcher AW, Albers GR, Rademakers M, Breugem S, van der Haven I, Jan Damen P, Bulstra GH, Campo MM, Somford MP, Haverkamp D, Liew S, Bedi H, Carr A, Chia A, Csongvay S, Donohue C, Doig S, Edwards E, Esser M, Freeman R, Gong A, Li D, Miller R, Ton L, Wang O, Young I, Dowrick A, Murdoch Z, Sage C, Page R, Bainbridge D, Angliss R, Miller B, Thomson A, Brown G, Williams S, Eng K, Bowyer D, Skelley J, Goyal C, Beattie S, Guerado E, Cruz E, Cano JR, Froufe MA, Serra LM, Al-dirra S, Martinez C, Tarazona Santabalbina FJ, Serra JT, Hernandez JT, Garcia MA, Garcia VM, Barrera S, Garrido M, Nordsletten L, Clarke-Jenssen J, Hjorthaug G, Brekke AC, Vesterhus EB, Skaugrud I, Tripathi P, Katiyar S, Shukla P, Swiontkowski M, Guyatt G, Jeray K, Walter S, Viveiros H, Truong V, Koo K, Zhou Q, Maddock D, Simunovic N, Agel J, Zielinski SM, Rangan A, Hanusch BC, Kottam L, Clarkson R, Della Rocca GJ, Slobogean G, Katz J, Gillespie B, Greendale GA, Hartman C, Rubin C, Waddell J, Lemke HM, Oatt A, Buckley RE, Korley R, Johnston K, Powell J, Sanders D, Lawendy A, Tieszer C, Murnaghan J, Nam D, Yee A, Whelan DB, Wild LM, Khan RM, Coady C, Amirault D, Richardson G, Dobbin G, Bicknell R, Yach J, Bardana D, Wood G, Harrison M, Yen D, Lambert S, Howells F, Ward A, Zalzal P, Brien H, Naumetz V, Weening B, Wai EK, Papp S, Gofton WT, Kingwell SP, Johnson G, O’Neil J, Roffey DM, Borsella V, Oliver TM, Jones V, Endres TJ, Agnew SG, Jeray KJ, Broderick JS, Goetz DR, Pace TB, Schaller TM, Porter SE, Tanner SL, Snider RG, Nastoff LA, Bielby SA, Switzer JA, Cole PA, Anderson SA, Lafferty PM, Li M, Ly TV, Marston SB, Foley AL, Vang S, Wright DM, Marcantonio AJ, Kain MSH, Iorio R, Specht LM, Tilzey JF, Lobo MJ, Garfi JS, Vallier HA, Dolenc A, Robinson C, Prayson MJ, Laughlin R, Rubino LJ, May J, Rieser GR, Dulaney-Cripe L, Gayton C, Gorczyca JT, Gross JM, Humphrey CA, Kates S, Noble K, McIntyre AW, Pecorella K, Davis CA, Lindenbaum S, Schwappach J, Baker JK, Rutherford T, Newman H, Lieberman S, Finn E, Robbins K, Hurley M, Lyle L, Mitchell K, Browner K, Whatley E, Payton K, Reeves C, Cannada LK, Karges D, Hill L, Esterhai J, Horan AD, Kaminski CA, Kowalski BN, Keeve JP, Anderson CG, McDonald MD, Hoffman JM, Tarkin I, Siska P, Gruen G, Evans A, Farrell DJ, Irrgang J, Luther A, Cross WW, Cass JR, Sems SA, Torchia ME, Scrabeck T, Jenkins M, Dumais J, Romero AW, Sagebien CA, Butler MS, Monica JT, Seuffert P, Hsu JR, Ficke J, Charlton M, Napierala M, Fan M, Tannoury C, Archdeacon M, Finnan R, Le T, Wyrick J, Hess S, Brennan ML, Probe R, Kile E, Mills K, Clipper L, Yu M, Erwin K, Horwitz D, Strohecker K, Swenson TK, Schmidt AH, Westberg JR, Aurang K, Zohman G, Peterson B, Huff RB, Baele J, Weber T, Edison M, McBeth J, Ertl JP, Parr JA, Moore MM, Tobias E, Thomas E, DePaolo CJ, Shell LE, Hampton L, Shepard S, Nanney T, Cuento C, Cantu RV, Henderson ER, Eickhoff LS, Hammerberg EM, Stahel P, Hak D, Mauffrey C, Gibula D, Gissel H, Henderson C, Zamorano DP, Tynan MC, Lawson D, Crist BD, Murtha YM, Anderson LK, Linehan C, Pilling L, Lewis CG, Sullivan RJ, Roper E, Obremskey W, Kregor P, Richards JE, Stringfellow K, Dohm MP, Zellar A, Segers MJM, Zijl JAC, Verhoeven B, Smits AB, de Vries JPPM, Fioole B, van der Hoeven H, Theunissen EBM, de Vries Reilingh TS, Govaert L, Wittich P, de Brauw M, Wille J, Go PM, Ritchie ED, Wessel RN, Hammacher ER, Visser GA, Stockmann H, Silvis R, Snellen JP, Rijbroek B, Scheepers JJG, Vermeulen EGJ, Siroen MPC, Vuylsteke R, Brom HLF, Rijna H, de Rijcke PAR, Koppert CL, Buijk SE, Groenendijk RPR, Dawson I, Tetteroo GWM, Bruijninckx MMM, Doornebosch PG, de Graaf EJR, van der Elst M, van der Pol CC, van’t Riet M, Karsten TM, de Vries MR, Stassen LPS, Schep NWL, Ben Schmidt G, Hoffman WH, van der Heijden FH, Willems WJ, van der Hart CP, Turckan K, Festen S, de Nies F, Out NJM, Bosma J, van Kampen A, Biert J, van Vugt AB, Edwards MJR, Blokhuis TJ, Frölke JPM, Geeraedts LMG, Gardeniers JWM, Tan ET, Poelhekke LM, de Waal Malefijt MC, Schreurs B, Roukema GR, Josaputra HA, Keller P, de Rooij PD, Kuiken H, Boxma H, Cleffken BI, Liem R, Rhemrev SJ, Bosman CHR, de Mol van Otterloo A, Hoogendoorn J, de Vries AC, Meylaerts SAG, Verhofstad MHJ, Meijer J, van Egmond T, van der Brand I, Patka P, Eversdijk MG, Peters R, Den Hartog D, Van Waes OJF, Oprel P, Campo M, Verhagen R, Albers GR, Simmermacher RKJ, van Mulken J, van Wessem K, van Gaalen SM, Leenen LPH, Bronkhorst MW, Guicherit OR, Goslings JC, Ponsen KJ, Bhatia M, Arora V, Tyagi V, Gupta A, Jain N, Khan F, Sharma A, Sanghavi A, Trivedi M, Rai A, Subash, Rai K, Yadav V, Singh S, Prasad AS, Mishra V, Sundaresh DC, Khanna A, Cherian JJ, Olakkengil DJ, Sharma G, Dadi A, Palla N, Ganguly U, Rai BS, Rajakumar J, Hull P, Lewis S, Evans S, Nanda R, Logishetty R, Anand S, Bowler C, Jennings A, Chuter G, Rose G, Horner G, Clark C, Eke K, Reed M, Herriott C, Dobb C, Curry H, Etherington G, Jain A, Moaveni A, Russ M, Donald G, Weinrauch P, Pincus P, Yang S, Halliday B, Gervais T, Holt M, Flynn A, Pirpiris M, Love D, Bucknill A, Farrugia RJ, Ianssen T, Amundsen A, Brattgjerd JE, Borch T, Bøe B, Flatøy B, Hasselund S, Haug KJ, Hemlock K, Hoseth TM, Jomaas G, Kibsgård T, Lona T, Moatshe G, Müller O, Molund M, Nicolaisen T, Nilsen F, Rydinge J, Smedsrud M, Stødle A, Trommer A, Ugland S, Karlsten A, Ekås G, Pape HC, Knobe M, Pfeifer R. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97:751-7. [PMID: 25948522 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.n.00542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) has been extensively evaluated in groups of patients with osteoarthritis, yet not in patients with a femoral neck fracture. This study aimed to determine the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the WOMAC compared with the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) questionnaires for the assessment of elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture. METHODS Reliability was tested by assessing the Cronbach alpha. Construct validity was determined with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Change scores were calculated from ten weeks to twelve months of follow-up. Standardized response means and floor and ceiling effects were determined. Analyses were performed to compare the results for patients less than eighty years old with those for patients eighty years of age or older. RESULTS The mean WOMAC total score was 89 points before the fracture in the younger patients and increased from 70 points at ten weeks to 81 points at two years postoperatively. In the older age group, these scores were 86, 75, and 78 points. The mean WOMAC pain scores before the fracture and at ten weeks and two years postoperatively were 92, 76, and 87 points, respectively, in the younger age group and 92, 84, and 93 points in the older age group. Function scores were 89, 68, and 79 points for the younger age group and 84, 71, and 73 points for the older age group. The Cronbach alpha for pain, stiffness, function, and the total scale ranged from 0.83 to 0.98 for the younger age group and from 0.79 to 0.97 for the older age group. Construct validity was good, with 82% and 79% of predefined hypotheses confirmed in the younger and older age groups, respectively. Responsiveness was moderate. No floor effects were found. Moderate to large ceiling effects were found for pain and stiffness scales at ten weeks and twelve months in younger patients (18% to 36%) and in the older age group (38% to 53%). CONCLUSIONS The WOMAC showed good reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness in both age groups of elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture who had been physically and mentally fit before the fracture. The instrument is suitable for use in future clinical studies in these populations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The results are based on two clinical trials. The questionnaires used concern pure, clinically relevant issues (ability to walk, climb stairs, etc.). Moreover, the results can be used for future research comparing clinical outcomes (or treatments) for populations with a femoral neck fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul T P W Burgers
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address for P.T.P.W. Burgers: . E-mail address for T.M.J. Van Bakel: . E-mail address for W.E. Tuinebreijer: . E-mail address for S.M. Zielinski: . E-mail address for E.M.M. Van Lieshout:
| | - Rudolf W Poolman
- Joint Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, P.O. Box 95500, 1090 HM Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address:
| | - Theodorus M J Van Bakel
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address for P.T.P.W. Burgers: . E-mail address for T.M.J. Van Bakel: . E-mail address for W.E. Tuinebreijer: . E-mail address for S.M. Zielinski: . E-mail address for E.M.M. Van Lieshout:
| | - Wim E Tuinebreijer
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address for P.T.P.W. Burgers: . E-mail address for T.M.J. Van Bakel: . E-mail address for W.E. Tuinebreijer: . E-mail address for S.M. Zielinski: . E-mail address for E.M.M. Van Lieshout:
| | - Stephanie M Zielinski
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address for P.T.P.W. Burgers: . E-mail address for T.M.J. Van Bakel: . E-mail address for W.E. Tuinebreijer: . E-mail address for S.M. Zielinski: . E-mail address for E.M.M. Van Lieshout:
| | - Mohit Bhandari
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, HSC 2C, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada. E-mail address:
| | - Peter Patka
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address:
| | - Esther M M Van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail address for P.T.P.W. Burgers: . E-mail address for T.M.J. Van Bakel: . E-mail address for W.E. Tuinebreijer: . E-mail address for S.M. Zielinski: . E-mail address for E.M.M. Van Lieshout:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic lateral ankle instability occurs in 10% to 20% of people after an acute ankle sprain. Initial treatment is conservative but if this fails and ligament laxity is present, surgical intervention is considered. OBJECTIVES To compare different treatments, conservative or surgical, for chronic lateral ankle instability. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and reference lists of articles, all to February 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA All identified randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of interventions for chronic lateral ankle instability were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data from each study. Where appropriate, results of comparable studies were pooled. MAIN RESULTS Ten randomised controlled trials were included. Limitations in the design, conduct and reporting of these trials resulted in unclear or high risk of bias assessments relating to allocation concealment, assessor blinding, incomplete and selective outcome reporting. Only limited pooling of the data was possible.Neuromuscular training was the basis of conservative treatment evaluated in four trials. Neuromuscular training compared with no training resulted in better ankle function scores at the end of four weeks training (Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool (AJFAT): mean difference (MD) 3.00, 95% CI 0.3 to 5.70; 1 trial, 19 participants; Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) data: MD 8.83, 95% CI 4.46 to 13.20; 2 trials, 56 participants). The fourth trial (19 participants) found no significant difference in the functional outcome after six weeks training programme on a cyclo-ergometer with a bi-directional compared with a traditional uni-directional pedal. Longer-term follow-up data were not available for these four trials.Four studies compared surgical procedures for chronic ankle instability. One trial (40 participants) found more nerve injuries after tenodesis than anatomical reconstruction (risk ratio (RR) 5.50, 95% CI 1.39 to 21.71). One trial (99 participants) comparing dynamic versus static tenodesis excluded 17 patients allocated dynamic tenodesis because their tendons were too thin. The same trial found that dynamic tenodesis resulted in higher numbers of people with unsatisfactory function (RR 8.62, 95% CI 1.97 to 37.77, 82 participants). One trial comparing techniques of lateral ankle ligament reconstruction (60 participants) found that operating time was shorter using the reinsertion technique than the imbrication method (MD -9.00 minutes, 95% CI -13.48 to -4.52). Two trials (70 participants) compared functional mobilisation with immobilisation after surgery. These found early mobilisation led to earlier return to work (MD -2.00 weeks, 95% CI -3.06 to -0.94; 1 trial) and to sports (MD -3.00 weeks, 95% CI -4.49 to -1.51; 1 trial). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Neuromuscular training alone appears effective in the short term but whether this advantage would persist on longer-term follow-up is not known. While there is insufficient evidence to support any one surgical intervention over another surgical intervention for chronic ankle instability, it is likely that there are limitations to the use of dynamic tenodesis. After surgical reconstruction, early functional rehabilitation appears to be superior to six weeks immobilisation in restoring early function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper S de Vries
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tergooiziekenhuizen, Van Riebeeckweg 212, Hilversum, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1213 XZ
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic lateral ankle instability occurs in 10% to 20% of people after an acute ankle sprain. Initial treatment is conservative but if this fails and ligament laxity is present, surgical intervention is considered. OBJECTIVES To compare different treatments, conservative or surgical, for chronic lateral ankle instability. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and reference lists of articles, all to February 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA All identified randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of interventions for chronic lateral ankle instability were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data from each study. Where appropriate, results of comparable studies were pooled. MAIN RESULTS Ten randomised controlled trials were included. Limitations in the design, conduct and reporting of these trials resulted in unclear or high risk of bias assessments relating to allocation concealment, assessor blinding, incomplete and selective outcome reporting. Only limited pooling of the data was possible.Neuromuscular training was the basis of conservative treatment evaluated in four trials. Neuromuscular training compared with no training resulted in better ankle function scores at the end of four weeks training (Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool (AJFAT): mean difference (MD) 3.00, 95% CI 0.3 to 5.70; 1 trial, 19 participants; Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) data: MD 8.83, 95% CI 4.46 to 13.20; 2 trials, 56 participants). The fourth trial (19 participants) found no significant difference in the functional outcome after six weeks training programme on a cyclo-ergometer with a bi-directional compared with a traditional uni-directional pedal. Longer-term follow-up data were not available for these four trials.Four studies compared surgical procedures for chronic ankle instability. One trial (40 participants) found more nerve injuries after tenodesis than anatomical reconstruction (risk ratio (RR) 5.50, 95% CI 1.39 to 21.71). One trial (99 participants) comparing dynamic versus static tenodesis excluded 17 patients allocated dynamic tenodesis because their tendons were too thin. The same trial found that dynamic tenodesis resulted in higher numbers of people with unsatisfactory function (RR 8.62, 95% CI 1.97 to 37.77, 82 participants). One trial comparing techniques of lateral ankle ligament reconstruction (60 participants) found that operating time was shorter using the reinsertion technique than the imbrication method (MD -9.00 minutes, 95% CI -13.48 to -4.52). Two trials (70 participants) compared functional mobilisation with immobilisation after surgery. These found early mobilisation led to earlier return to work (MD -2.00 weeks, 95% CI -3.06 to -0.94; 1 trial) and to sports (MD -3.00 weeks, 95% CI -4.49 to -1.51; 1 trial). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Neuromuscular training alone appears effective in the short term but whether this advantage would persist on longer-term follow-up is not known. While there is insufficient evidence to support any one surgical intervention over another surgical intervention for chronic ankle instability, it is likely that there are limitations to the use of dynamic tenodesis. After surgical reconstruction, early functional rehabilitation appears to be superior to six weeks immobilisation in restoring early function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper S de Vries
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tergooiziekenhuizen, Van Riebeeckweg 212, Hilversum, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1213 XZ
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Bergen CJA, Blankevoort L, de Haan RJ, Sierevelt IN, Meuffels DE, d'Hooghe PRN, Krips R, van Damme G, van Dijk CN. Pulsed electromagnetic fields after arthroscopic treatment for osteochondral defects of the talus: double-blind randomized controlled multicenter trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10:83. [PMID: 19591674 PMCID: PMC2714496 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2009] [Accepted: 07/10/2009] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Osteochondral talar defects usually affect athletic patients. The primary surgical treatment consists of arthroscopic debridement and microfracturing. Although this is mostly successful, early sport resumption is difficult to achieve, and it can take up to one year to obtain clinical improvement. Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) may be effective for talar defects after arthroscopic treatment by promoting tissue healing, suppressing inflammation, and relieving pain. We hypothesize that PEMF-treatment compared to sham-treatment after arthroscopy will lead to earlier resumption of sports, and aim at 25% increase in patients that resume sports. Methods/Design A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in five centers throughout the Netherlands and Belgium. 68 patients will be randomized to either active PEMF-treatment or sham-treatment for 60 days, four hours daily. They will be followed-up for one year. The combined primary outcome measures are (a) the percentage of patients that resume and maintain sports, and (b) the time to resumption of sports, defined by the Ankle Activity Score. Secondary outcome measures include resumption of work, subjective and objective scoring systems (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society – Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, Foot Ankle Outcome Score, Numeric Rating Scales of pain and satisfaction, EuroQol-5D), and computed tomography. Time to resumption of sports will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Discussion This trial will provide level-1 evidence on the effectiveness of PEMFs in the management of osteochondral ankle lesions after arthroscopy. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register (NTR1636)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiaan J A van Bergen
- Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
De Vries JS, Krips R, Blankevoort L, Fievez AW, Van Dijk CN. Arthroscopic Capsular Shrinkage for Chronic Ankle Instability with Thermal Radiofrequency: Prospective Multicenter Trial. Orthopedics 2008. [DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20080701-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
|
15
|
de Vries JS, Krips R, Blankevoort L, Fievez AWFM, van Dijk CN. Arthroscopic capsular shrinkage for chronic ankle instability with thermal radiofrequency: prospective multicenter trial. Orthopedics 2008; 31:655. [PMID: 19292383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The study was designed as a prospective multicenter longitudinal trial. Adult patients with symptomatic mechanical chronic ankle instability, not improving with conservative therapy, were included and underwent surgery. Primary outcome measures were radiological and manually tested mechanical laxity. Secondary outcome measures were number of complications, reoperations and symptoms, range of motion, and functional (ankle) scores (Karlsson and SF-36 score). The latest follow-up was 9 months for each patient. Thirty-nine patients underwent surgery (19 male patients; 16 right ankles; median age, 27 years). Mechanical stability showed no clinically relevant improvement whereas most secondary outcome measures showed a substantial and statistically significant improvement. One surgery-related complication occurred without functional consequences, and 3 patients underwent a secondary procedure. One was considered a treatment failure, requiring an open anatomic ligament reconstruction. The second patient sustained a severe supination trauma by starting intensive training too early, also requiring an open anatomic reconstruction. The third patient had posterior ankle pain, which was successfully treated by posterior ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopic thermal capsular shrinkage of the ankle is a safe procedure, leading to resolution of symptoms in the majority of patients with chronic ankle instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper S de Vries
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, G4-261, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Poolman RW, Struijs PAA, Krips R, Sierevelt IN, Marti RK, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M. Reporting of outcomes in orthopaedic randomized trials: does blinding of outcome assessors matter? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89:550-8. [PMID: 17332104 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.f.00683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomization, concealment of treatment allocation, and blinding are all known to limit bias in clinical research. Nonsurgical studies that fail to meet these standards have been reported to inflate the differences between treatment and control groups. While surgical trials can rarely blind surgeons or patients, they can often blind outcome assessors. The aim of this systematic review was threefold: (1) to examine the reporting of outcome measures in orthopaedic trials, (2) to determine the feasibility of blinding in published orthopaedic trials, and (3) to examine the association between the magnitude of treatment differences and the blinding of outcome assessors. METHODS We identified and reviewed thirty-two randomized, controlled trials published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) in 2003 and 2004 for the appropriate use of outcome measures. These trials represented 3.4% of all 938 studies published during that time-period. All thirty-two trials were reviewed by two authors for (1) the outcome measures used and (2) the blinding of outcomes assessors. We calculated the magnitude of the treatment effect of the use of blinded compared with unblinded outcome assessors. RESULTS Ten (31%) of the thirty-two randomized controlled trials used a modified outcome instrument. Of the ten trials, four failed to describe how the outcome instrument was modified. Nine of the ten articles did not describe how the modified instrument was validated and retested. Sixteen of the thirty-two randomized controlled trials did not report blinding of outcome assessors when blinding would have been possible. Among the studies with continuous outcome measure, unblinded outcomes assessment was associated with significantly larger treatment effects than blinded outcomes assessment (standardized mean difference, 0.76 compared with 0.25; p = 0.01). Similarly, in the studies with dichotomous outcomes, unblinded outcomes assessments were associated with significantly greater treatment effects than blinded outcomes assessments (odds ratio, 0.13 compared with 0.42; p < 0.001). The ratio of odds ratios (unblinded to blinded outcomes assessment) was 0.31, suggesting that unblinded outcomes assessment was associated with a potential for exaggeration of the benefit of the effectiveness of a treatment in our cohort of studies. CONCLUSIONS In future orthopaedic randomized controlled trials, emphasis should be placed on detailed reporting of outcome measures to facilitate generalization and the outcome assessors should be blinded, when possible, to limit bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudolf W Poolman
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences-General Hospital, 237 Barton Street East, 7 North, Suite 727, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic lateral ankle instability occurs in 10% to 20% of people after an acute ankle sprain. The initial form of treatment is conservative but if this fails and ligament laxity is present, surgical intervention is considered. OBJECTIVES To compare different treatments, both conservative and surgical, for chronic lateral ankle instability. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialized Register (to July 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 3), and MEDLINE (1966 to April 2006), EMBASE (1980 to April 2006), CINAHL (1982 to April 2006) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of interventions for chronic lateral ankle instability were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. Where appropriate, results of comparable studies were pooled. MAIN RESULTS Seven randomised trials were included and divided into three groups: surgical interventions; rehabilitation programs after surgical interventions; and conservative interventions. None of the studies were methodologically flawless. Only one study described an adequate randomisation procedure. Only two studies, both about rehabilitation programs after surgery, had a moderate risk of bias; all other studies had a high risk of bias. Due to clinical and methodological diversity, extensive pooling of the data was not possible. Surgical interventions (four studies): one study showed more complications after the Chrisman-Snook procedure compared to an anatomical reconstruction, whereas another study showed greater mean talar tilt after an anatomical reconstruction. Subjective instability and hindfoot inversion was greater after a dynamic than after a static tenodesis in a third study. The fourth study showed that the operating time for anatomical reconstructions was shorter for the reinsertion technique than for the imbrication method. Rehabilitation after surgical interventions (two studies): both studies provided evidence that early functional mobilization leads to an earlier return to work and sports than immobilisation. Conservative interventions: the only study in this group showed better proprioception and functional outcome with the bi-directional than with the uni-directional pedal technique on a cyclo-ergometer. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In view of the low quality methodology of almost all the studies, this review does not provide sufficient evidence to support any specific surgical or conservative intervention for chronic ankle instability. However, after surgical reconstruction, early functional rehabilitation was shown to be superior to six weeks immobilisation regarding time to return to work and sports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S de Vries
- Orthotrauma Research Center Amsterdam (ORCA) Academic Medical Center, Orthopaedic Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic lateral ankle instability occurs in 10% to 20% of people after an acute ankle sprain. The initial form of treatment is conservative but if this fails and ligament laxity is present, surgical intervention is considered. OBJECTIVES To compare different treatments, both conservative and surgical, for chronic lateral ankle instability. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialized Register (to July 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 3), and MEDLINE (1966 to April 2006), EMBASE (1980 to April 2006), CINAHL (1982 to April 2006) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of interventions for chronic lateral ankle instability were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. Where appropriate, results of comparable studies were pooled. MAIN RESULTS Seven randomised trials were included and divided into three groups: surgical interventions; rehabilitation programs after surgical interventions; and conservative interventions. None of the studies were methodologically flawless. Only one study described an adequate randomisation procedure. Only two studies, both about rehabilitation programs after surgery, had a moderate risk of bias; all other studies had a high risk of bias. Due to clinical and methodological diversity, extensive pooling of the data was not possible. Surgical interventions (four studies): one study showed more complications after the Chrisman-Snook procedure compared to an anatomical reconstruction, whereas another study showed greater mean talar tilt after an anatomical reconstruction. Subjective instability and hindfoot inversion was greater after a dynamic than after a static tenodesis in a third study. The fourth study showed that the operating time for anatomical reconstructions was shorter for the reinsertion technique than for the imbrication method. Rehabilitation after surgical interventions (two studies): both studies provided evidence that early functional mobilization leads to an earlier return to work and sports than immobilisation. Conservative interventions: the only study in this group showed better proprioception and functional outcome with the bi-directional than with the uni-directional pedal technique on a cyclo-ergometer. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In view of the low quality methodology of almost all the studies, this review does not provide sufficient evidence to support any specific surgical or conservative intervention for chronic ankle instability. However, after surgical reconstruction, early functional rehabilitation was shown to be superior to six weeks immobilisation regarding time to return to work and sports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S de Vries
- Orthotrauma Research Center Amsterdam (ORCA) Academic Medical Center, Orthopaedic Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Poolman RW, Struijs PAA, Krips R, Sierevelt IN, Lutz KH, Bhandari M. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 6:44. [PMID: 16965628 PMCID: PMC1590046 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2006] [Accepted: 09/11/2006] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Levels of Evidence Rating System is widely believed to categorize studies by quality, with Level I studies representing the highest quality evidence. We aimed to determine the reporting quality of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in the most frequently cited general orthopaedic journals. Methods Two assessors identified orthopaedic journals that reported a level of evidence rating in their abstracts from January 2003 to December 2004 by searching the instructions for authors of the highest impact general orthopaedic journals. Based upon a priori eligibility criteria, two assessors hand searched all issues of the eligible journal from 2003–2004 for RCTs. The assessors extracted the demographic information and the evidence rating from each included RCT and scored the quality of reporting using the reporting quality assessment tool, which was developed by the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group. Scores were conducted in duplicate, and we reached a consensus for any disagreements. We examined the correlation between the level of evidence rating and the Cochrane reporting quality score. Results We found that only the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery – American Volume (JBJS-A) used a level of evidence rating from 2003 to 2004. We identified 938 publications in the JBJS-A from January 2003 to December 2004. Of these publications, 32 (3.4%) were RCTs that fit the inclusion criteria. The 32 RCTs included a total of 3543 patients, with sample sizes ranging from 17 to 514 patients. Despite being labelled as the highest level of evidence (Level 1 and Level II evidence), these studies had low Cochrane reporting quality scores among individual methodological safeguards. The Cochrane reporting quality scores did not differ significantly between Level I and Level II studies. Correlations varied from 0.0 to 0.2 across the 12 items of the Cochrane reporting quality assessment tool (p > 0.05). Among items closely corresponding to the Levels of Evidence Rating System criteria assessors achieved substantial agreement (ICC = 0.80, 95%CI:0.60 to 0.90). Conclusion Our findings suggest that readers should not assume that 1) studies labelled as Level I have high reporting quality and 2) Level I studies have better reporting quality than Level II studies. One should address methodological safeguards individually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudolf W Poolman
- Department Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 7 North, Room 727, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 7 North, Room 727, 237 Barton Street East Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
| | - Peter AA Struijs
- OrthoTrauma Research Centre Amsterdam, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, G4 Noord, PO Box: 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Ziekenhuis Hilversum, Postbus 10016, 1201 DA, Hilversum, The Netherlands
| | - Rover Krips
- OrthoTrauma Research Centre Amsterdam, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, G4 Noord, PO Box: 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Ziekenhuis Hilversum, Postbus 10016, 1201 DA, Hilversum, The Netherlands
| | - Inger N Sierevelt
- OrthoTrauma Research Centre Amsterdam, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, G4 Noord, PO Box: 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kristina H Lutz
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 7 North, Room 727, 237 Barton Street East Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
| | - Mohit Bhandari
- Department Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 7 North, Room 727, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 7 North, Room 727, 237 Barton Street East Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
The ankle joint is the most congruent joint of the human body. Stability is provided by the bony configuration of the ankle mortise and the talar dome and by the ankle ligaments. During ankle motions, rotation and translation around and along the movement axes occur. Soft tissue stability is provided mainly by the ligaments. This article discusses ankle instability, injuries, and reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rover Krips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Verhagen RAW, Maas M, Dijkgraaf MGW, Tol JL, Krips R, van Dijk CN. Prospective study on diagnostic strategies in osteochondral lesions of the talus. Is MRI superior to helical CT? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87:41-6. [PMID: 15686236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
Our aim in this prospective study was to determine the best diagnostic method for discriminating between patients with and without osteochondral lesions of the talus, with special relevance to the value of MRI compared with the new technique of multidetector helical CT. We compared the diagnostic value of history, physical examination and standard radiography, a 4 cm heel-rise view, helical CT, MRI, and diagnostic arthroscopy for simultaneous detection or exclusion of osteochondral lesions of the talus. A consecutive series of 103 patients (104 ankles) with chronic ankle pain was included in this study. Of these, 29 with 35 osteochondral lesions were identified. Twenty-seven lesions were located in the talus. Our findings showed that helical CT, MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy were significantly better than history, physical examination and standard radiography for detecting or excluding an osteochondral lesion. Also, MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy performed better than a mortise view with a 4 cm heel-rise. We did not find a statistically significant difference between helical CT and MRI. Diagnostic arthroscopy did not perform better than helical CT and MRI for detecting or excluding an osteochondral lesion.
Collapse
|
22
|
Verhagen RAW, Maas M, Dijkgraaf MGW, Tol JL, Krips R, van Dijk CN. Prospective study on diagnostic strategies in osteochondral lesions of the talus. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b1.14702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Our aim in this prospective study was to determine the best diagnostic method for discriminating between patients with and without osteochondral lesions of the talus, with special relevance to the value of MRI compared with the new technique of multidetector helical CT. We compared the diagnostic value of history, physical examination and standard radiography, a 4 cm heel-rise view, helical CT, MRI, and diagnostic arthroscopy for simultaneous detection or exclusion of osteochondral lesions of the talus. A consecutive series of 103 patients (104 ankles) with chronic ankle pain was included in this study. Of these, 29 with 35 osteochondral lesions were identified. Twenty-seven lesions were located in the talus. Our findings showed that helical CT, MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy were significantly better than history, physical examination and standard radiography for detecting or excluding an osteochondral lesion. Also, MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy performed better than a mortise view with a 4 cm heel-rise. We did not find a statistically significant difference between helical CT and MRI. Diagnostic arthroscopy did not perform better than helical CT and MRI for detecting or excluding an osteochondral lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. A. W. Verhagen
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ziekenhuis Hilversum, PO Box 10016, 1201 DA Hilversum, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - J. L. Tol
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Krips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C. Niek van Dijk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnostic value of an oblique radiograph, in addition to a lateral radiograph, for detecting osteophytes in the anterior ankle impingement syndrome was evaluated in a prospective study. The hypothesis was that the application of a lateral radiograph is insufficient to detect osteophytes that are located in the anteromedial aspect of the ankle joint. Oblique anteromedial impingement (AMI) radiographs were hypothesized to be a relevant adjunct, because of their utility to detect these anteromedially located osteophytes. METHODS Presence or absence of tibial and talar osteophytes on both radiographs was compared with the combined findings of CT, MRI scan, and arthroscopic surgery. Estimates of test characteristics were obtained for 60 consecutive patients with an anterior ankle impingement syndrome. RESULTS It was shown that the sensitivity of lateral radiographs for detecting anterior tibial and talar osteophytes was 40% and 32%, respectively (specificity, 70% and 82%). When the lateral radiograph was combined with an oblique AMI radiograph, these figures increased to 85% and 73%, respectively (specificity decreased to 45% and 68%). This increase was due to the high sensitivity of the oblique AMI radiographs for detecting anteromedial osteophytes (93% for tibial and 67% for talar osteophytes). CONCLUSION A lateral radiograph is insufficient to detect all anteriorly located osteophytes. An oblique AMI radiograph is a useful adjunct to routine radiographs and is recommended to detect anteromedial tibial and talar osteophytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes L Tol
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Postbox 22700, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pijnenburg ACM, Bogaard K, Krips R, Marti RK, Bossuyt PMM, van Dijk CN. Operative and functional treatment of rupture of the lateral ligament of the ankle. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85:525-30. [PMID: 12793557 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b4.13928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Consecutive patients with a confirmed rupture of at least one of the lateral ligaments of the ankle were randomly assigned to receive either operative or functional treatment. They were evaluated at a median of 8 years (6 to 11). In total, 370 patients were included. Follow-up was available for 317 (86%). Fewer patients allocated to operative treatment reported residual pain compared with those who had been allocated to functional treatment (16% versus 25%, RR 0.64, CI 041 to 1.0). Fewer surgically-treated patients reported symptoms of giving way (20% versus 32%, RR 0.62, CI 0.42 to 0.92) and recurrent sprains (22% versus 34%, RR 0.66, CI 0.45 to 0.94). The anterior drawer test was less frequently positive in surgically-treated patients (30% versus 54%, RR 0.54, CI 0.41 to 0.72). The median Povacz score was significantly higher in the operative group (26 versus 22, p < 0.001). Compared with functional treatment, operative treatment gives a better long-term outcome in terms of residual pain, recurrent sprains and stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C M Pijnenburg
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
We report on 2 patients with a large intraosseous ganglion of the talus who were treated by means of a 2-portal endoscopic approach of the hindfoot with the patient in the prone position. By means of this approach, it is possible to visualize, debride, and graft a large intraosseous talar lesion. In both patients, the lesions were treated successfully, with no recurrence at follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter E Scholten
- Department of Orthopaedics, Academical Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
In this retrospective study, we assessed the outcome in 99 patients who underwent reconstruction of the lateral ligaments of the ankle for chronic anterolateral instability with a minimum follow-up of 15 years. Two techniques were compared: 54 patients had an anatomical reconstruction (AR group) and 45 had an Evans tenodesis (ET group). They were followed up for 19.9 ± 3.6 years and 21.8 ± 4.6 years, respectively. During follow-up, seven patients in the AR group and 17 in the ET group required a further operation (p = 0.004). At follow-up, significantly more patients (n = 15) in the ET group had limited dorsiflexion than in the AR group (n = 6, p = 0.007) and 18 in the ET group had a positive anterior drawer test compared with seven in the AR group (p = 0002). In the ET group 27 had tenderness on palpation of the ankle compared with 15 in the AR group (p = 0.001). Stress radiographs showed ligamentous laxity significantly more often in the ET group (n = 30) than in the AR group (n = 13, p < 0.001). The mean values for talar tilt and anterior talar translation were significantly higher in the ET group than in the AR group (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively). There were degenerative changes on standard radiographs in 32 patients in the AR group and 35 in the ET group (p = 0.05). Four patients in the ET group had developed severe osteoarthritis compared with none in the AR group (p = 0.025). Assessment of functional stability revealed a mean Karlsson score of 83.7 ± 10.4 points in the AR group and 67.0 ± 15.8 points in the ET group (p < 0.001). According to the Good rating system, 43 patients in the AR group had good or excellent results compared with 15 in the ET group (p < 0.001). Compared with anatomical reconstruction, the Evans tenodesis does not prevent laxity in a large number of patients. Long-standing ligamentous laxity leads to degenerative change in the ankle, resulting in chronic pain, limited dorsiflexion and further operations. The functional result deteriorates more rapidly after the Evans tenodesis than after anatomical reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Krips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Meiberg-dreef 9, Postbus 22660 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S. Brandsson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden
| | - C. Swensson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden
| | - C. N. van Dijk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Meiberg-dreef 9, Postbus 22660 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. Karlsson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Krips R, Brandsson S, Swensson C, van Dijk CN, Karlsson J. Anatomical reconstruction and Evans tenodesis of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. Clinical and radiological findings after follow-up for 15 to 30 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84:232-6. [PMID: 11924653 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b2.12143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
In this retrospective study, we assessed the outcome in 99 patients who underwent reconstruction of the lateral ligaments of the ankle for chronic anterolateral instability with a minimum follow-up of 15 years. Two techniques were compared: 54 patients had an anatomical reconstruction (AR group) and 45 had an Evans tenodesis (ET group). They were followed up for 19.9+/-3.6 years and 21.8+/-4.6 years, respectively. During follow-up, seven patients in the AR group and 17 in the ET group required a further operation (p = 0.004). At follow-up, significantly more patients (n = 15) in the ET group had limited dorsiflexion than in the AR group (n = 6, p = 0.007) and 18 in the ET group had a positive anterior drawer test compared with seven in the AR group (p = 0002). In the ET group 27 had tenderness on palpation of the ankle compared with 15 in the AR group (p = 0.001). Stress radiographs showed ligamentous laxity significantly more often in the ET group (n = 30) than in the AR group (n = 13, p < 0.001). The mean values for talar tilt and anterior talar translation were significantly higher in the ET group than in the AR group (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively). There were degenerative changes on standard radiographs in 32 patients in the AR group and 35 in the ET group (p = 0.05). Four patients in the ET group had developed severe osteoarthritis compared with none in the AR group (p = 0.025). Assessment of functional stability revealed a mean Karlsson score of 83.7+/-10.4 points in the AR group and 67.0+/-15.8 points in the ET group (p < 0.001). According to the Good rating system, 43 patients in the AR group had good or excellent results compared with 15 in the ET group (p < 0.001). Compared with anatomical reconstruction, the Evans tenodesis does not prevent laxity in a large number of patients. Long-standing ligamentous laxity leads to degenerative change in the ankle, resulting in chronic pain, limited dorsiflexion and further operations. The functional result deteriorates more rapidly after the Evans tenodesis than after anatomical reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Krips
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Krips R, van Dijk CN, Lehtonen H, Halasi T, Moyen B, Karlsson J. Sports activity level after surgical treatment for chronic anterolateral ankle instability. A multicenter study. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30:13-9. [PMID: 11798990 DOI: 10.1177/03635465020300010801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this retrospective multicenter study was to determine whether anatomic reconstruction or tenodesis produces better results in athletic patients with lateral ankle instability. Forty-one patients who underwent anatomic reconstruction and 36 patients who underwent tenodesis were followed up. The median preinjury Tegner score for both groups was 9 (range, 7 to 10). At follow-up, 2 to 10 years after surgical treatment, the median Tegner score for both groups was 8 (range, 4 to 10). In the tenodesis group, 17 patients had a lower Tegner score than before the operation, but in the anatomic reconstruction group only 4 patients had lower scores. Significantly more patients in the tenodesis group (15) had limited ankle dorsiflexion than in the anatomic reconstruction group (3). Plain radiographs revealed that 11 patients in the tenodesis group had medially located osteophytes, compared with only 2 patients in the anatomic reconstruction group. Stress radiographs revealed that more patients in the anatomic reconstruction group had normal laxity values than in the tenodesis group (38 and 28, respectively). According to the rating system developed by Good et al., 36 patients in the anatomic reconstruction group had a good or excellent result, versus 21 patients in the tenodesis group. Anatomic reconstruction was found to be superior to tenodesis in all of the investigated outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rover Krips
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Krips R, van Dijk CN, Halasi PT, Lehtonen H, Corradini C, Moyen B, Karlsson J. Long-term outcome of anatomical reconstruction versus tenodesis for the treatment of chronic anterolateral instability of the ankle joint: a multicenter study. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22:415-21. [PMID: 11428761 DOI: 10.1177/107110070102200510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The long-term clinical outcome after anatomical reconstruction and tenodesis in the treatment of chronic anterolateral ankle instability was assessed in a retrospective multicentre study. The first group (AR) consisted of 25 patients (mean age at operation 22 yrs +/- 5.7) who underwent anatomical reconstruction and the second group (TE) of 29 patients (mean age 23 yrs +/- 6.6) who underwent tenodesis. For both groups, the mean follow-up period was 12.3 yrs (AR +/- 2.5 yrs, TE +/- 2.7 yrs). At physical examination, there were significantly more patients in the TE group (n=18) with a positive anterior drawer sign as compared with the AR group (n=7) (p=0.02). Medially located degenerative changes in the ankle joint as seen on standard radiographs were seen more often in the TE group (n=7) than in the AR group (n=1) (p=0.03). The mean talar tilt, 4.7 degrees in the AR group vs 6.9 degrees in the TE group, (p=0.02) and anterior talar translation, 2.9 mm in the AR group vs 4.3 mm in the TE group, (p=0.04) were significantly higher in the TE group at radiographic stress examination. According to the rating system developed by Good et al. (1975), significantly fewer patients in the TE group (n=8) had an excellent result as compared with the AR group (n=15) (p=0.03) and more patients in the TE group (n=9) had a fair or poor result (p=0.04) as compared with the AR group (n=2). We conclude that a tenodesis procedure does not restore the normal anatomy of the lateral ankle ligaments. When compared with anatomical reconstruction, a tenodesis leads to inferior results in terms of functional and mechanical stability, as well as overall satisfaction at long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Krips
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
We describe a 2-portal endoscopic approach of the hindfoot with the patient in the prone position. By means of this approach, it is possible to visualize and treat a variety of posterior ankle problems. Not only can pathology of the posterior ankle joint and subtalar joint be visualized and treated, but also periarticular pathology, such as calcifications or scar tissue, can be diagnosed and treated. We describe a professional ballet dancer with chronic flexor hallucis longus tendinitis and a posterior ankle impingement syndrome caused by an os trigonum of both ankles. The patient was successfully treated by removing the os trigonum and releasing the flexor hallucis longus tendon. She resumed her professional activities within 2 months after endoscopic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C N van Dijk
- Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
We describe a 2-portal endoscopic approach of the hindfoot with the patient in the prone position. By means of this approach, it is possible to visualize and treat a variety of posterior ankle problems. Not only can pathology of the posterior ankle joint and subtalar joint be visualized and treated, but also periarticular pathology, such as calcifications or scar tissue, can be diagnosed and treated. We describe a professional ballet dancer with chronic flexor hallucis longus tendinitis and a posterior ankle impingement syndrome caused by an os trigonum of both ankles. The patient was successfully treated by removing the os trigonum and releasing the flexor hallucis longus tendon. She resumed her professional activities within 2 months after endoscopic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C N van Dijk
- Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Krips R, van Dijk CN, Halasi T, Lehtonen H, Moyen B, Lanzetta A, Farkas T, Karlsson J. Anatomical reconstruction versus tenodesis for the treatment of chronic anterolateral instability of the ankle joint: a 2- to 10-year follow-up, multicenter study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2000; 8:173-9. [PMID: 10883430 DOI: 10.1007/s001670050210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The clinical outcome of anatomical reconstruction or tenodesis in the treatment of chronic anterolateral ankle instability was assessed in a retrospective multicenter study. The anatomical reconstruction group (group A) consisted of 106 patients (mean age at operation 24 +/- 8.4 years) and the tenodesis group (group B) of 110 patients (mean age at operation 26 +/- 11.4 years). Patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 5.5 +/- 2.8 years in group A and 5.2 +/- 2.9 years in group B. The review protocol included patient characteristics, physical examination, two ankle scoring scales to evaluate the functional results, and standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs to evaluate degenerative changes. Mechanical stability was evaluated using standardized stress radiographs. A larger number of reoperations was performed in group B (P = 0.008). At physical examination, more patients in group B had a smaller range of ankle motion than those in group A (P = 0.009). A larger proportion of patients in group B had medially located osteophytes, as seen on standard radiographs (P = 0.04). On stress radiographic examination, the mean talar tilt (P = 0.001) and mean anterior talar translation (P < 0.001) were seen to be significantly greater in group B than in group A. There were no differences in mean Karlsson score between the groups, but more patients in group A had an excellent result on the Good score (P = 0.011). Unlike anatomical reconstructions, tenodeses do not restore the normal anatomy of the lateral ankle ligaments. This results in restricted range of ankle motion, reduced long-term stability, an increased risk of medially located degenerative changes, a larger number of reoperations, and less satisfactory overall results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Krips
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|