Anatomical study of the medial patello-femoral ligament: landmarks for its surgical reconstruction

Palpation and fluoroscopy are valid but unreliable for the assessment of femoral tunnel position after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of two techniques, palpation and fluoroscopy, for assessing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction femoral tunnel position accuracy.

METHODS

Twenty-one fresh frozen cadaveric knees had an MPFL femoral tunnel drilled and filled with a metal screw. Tunnels were created in a nonstandard fashion to ensure the sample included a range of tunnel positions from poor to ideal. Six experienced sport medicine and arthroscopy surgeons evaluated the placement of the femoral tunnel by palpating the screw in relation to anatomic landmarks and by fluoroscopy related to Schöttle's Point. They evaluated 1) the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement, 2) the direction of tunnel error, and 3) the clinical acceptability of the tunnel position. Validity measures included sensitivity, specificity, and correlation to clinical acceptability, which were calculated for the palpation and fluoroscopic assessments. Reliability measures included interrater reliability (ICC 2,k) for femoral tunnel accuracy and percent agreement of the raters' tunnel direction assessment.

RESULTS

The palpation method demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.79 and specificity of 0.84 for assessing the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement, while the fluoroscopic method showed a sensitivity of 0.83 and specificity of 0.92. Pearson correlation coefficients for clinical acceptability of tunnel position were high, with both techniques ranging from .589 to .854. Interrater reliability for the palpation and fluoroscopic techniques for assessment of tunnel accuracy were 0.31 and 0.55 (ICC 2,k), respectively. Assessment of the direction of tunnel error was good with the fluoroscopic technique slightly more accurate than palpation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that both palpation and fluoroscopy are valid techniques for assessing femoral tunnel position after MPFL reconstruction. Despite demonstrating good validity, the accuracy of assessing tunnel position was unreliable in a group of six experienced knee surgeons. Further research into MPFL reconstruction femoral tunnel assessment techniques, including patient-specific reference standards, is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

Cadaveric Study to Define the Anatomy of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) and Its Variant Patterns

BACKGROUND

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is one of the major soft tissue stabilizers on the medial side of the knee joint, extending from the medial condyle of the femur to the medial aspect of the patella. Different kinds of literature described different sizes and different origins and insertions of MPFL. Injury of MPFL causes patellar instability and dislocation. We reported the anatomy and morphology of MPFL and its implications in the repair of MPFL. The aim of the study was also to look at the variant forms of the MPFL.   Methodology: A total of 40 lower limbs fixed in formalin were dissected to study the MPFL of the knee. After reflecting the deep fascia and retinaculum on the medial side of the knee joint the MPFL was exposed. For better learning the lower medial part of vastus medialis was reflected, so that the part of MPFL undercover was exposed.

RESULTS

 Different forms of MPFL were seen like two straps 12.5%, broad rectangle 20%, and triangular shaped 67.5% MPFL. The origin of MPFL was found between the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle of the femur and insertion was seen extending from the proximal medial half of the patella to the tendinous aponeurosis of vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) and vastus intermedius muscle (VIM).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that described three variant patterns of MPFL in accordance with their morphological appearance. This knowledge will be helpful to the surgeons for easy identification and repair of the MPFL.

A Simple Instrument for Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Localization of Anatomic Insertions in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the most common operation for treating patellofemoral joint instability. Accurately identifying the fluoroscopic location of the MPFL anatomical insertion point is critical in this procedure. However, current radiographic localization has some limitations, such as inaccuracy and radiation exposure. We recommend a simpler and more accurate instrument for intraoperative fluoroscopic positioning.

Are Patellofemoral Ligaments and Retinacula Distinct Structures of the Knee Joint? An Anatomic, Histological and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

There is disagreement regarding the description of the patellofemoral ligaments (PFLs), considered by some authors as capsular thickening and by others as independent ligaments. It was hypothesised that the PFLs and retinacula are structures with different histological features. The aim of this study was to describe the stabilising structures of the patella in detail and to determine if the PFLs and retinacula are different and separable structures from a macroscopic, microscopic and imaging viewpoint. An anatomical study was performed on eight knees from five cadavers (mean age, 56.2 years; range, 35–63 years), and a histological study was conducted on specimens from nine patients having a mean age of 65 years (range 35–84 years) who had undergone surgical knee procedures. The imaging study was based on 100 MRIs (96 patients). The mean age was 46 years (range 16–88), and the study analysed the capsular-ligamentous structures. In the medial compartment, the layers and structures were as follows: superficial layer, medial retinaculum; intermediate layer, Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL), Posterior Oblique Ligament (POL) and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL); deep layer, deep part of the MCL and joint capsule. In the lateral compartment, the layers and structures were the following: superficial layer, lateral retinaculum; intermediate layer, Lateral Collateral Ligament (LCL) and Lateral Patellofemoral Ligament (LPFL); deep layer, joint capsule. All of the knees examined presented a clearly distinguishable MPFL and LPFL separable from the capsular layer. Histological study: there was a higher density of nerve fibres in retinacula compared to ligaments (p = 0.0034) and a higher content of elastic fibres in retinacula (p < 0.0005). In imaging, there was no difference between medial and lateral retinaculum thickness (p > 0.05). In conclusion, both the lateral and medial compartment can be described using the three-layer scheme. PFLs and retinacula are separate structures both macroscopically and according to imaging analysis. The retinacula respond to their specific function with a higher nerve fibre content and higher number of elastic fibres compared to the ligaments.

Medial patellofemoral ligament is a part of the vastus medialis obliquus and vastus intermedius aponeuroses attaching to the medial epicondyle

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the bony surface characteristic of the femoral attachment of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and the correlation between the relevant layered structures, including muscular aponeurosis and the joint capsule, which contribute to patellofemoral joint (PFJ) stability.

METHODS

The morphology of the medial aspect of the medial condyle using micro-computed tomography and analysed cortical bone thickening in 24 knees was observed. For the macroscopic and histological analyses, 21 and 3 knees were allocated, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test with Dunn post hoc testing was performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

At the level of the adductor tubercle, there were no significant differences in cortical bone thickness. At the level of the medial epicondyle (MEC), cortical bone thickness was considerably greater than that in other areas of the medial condyle (mean ± standard deviation, 0.60 ± 0.20 mm; p < 0.0001). Macroscopic analysis revealed that the deep aponeurosis of the vastus medialis obliquus and the tendinous arch of the vastus intermedius distally formed the composite membrane and adjoined to the joint capsule to firmly attach to MEC, which was located at 41.3 ± 5.7 mm posterior and 14.2 ± 3.1 mm superior to the joint cartilage. Histological analysis showed a composite membrane and adjoining capsule attached to MEC via fibrocartilage.

CONCLUSION

MPFL could be interpreted as part of the deep aponeurosis of the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) and the tendinous arch of the vastus intermedius, which combined with the joint capsule to attach to MEC. The cortical bone thickening indicated that the tensile stresses were loaded on MEC in aged cadavers. Involvement of VMO and vastus intermedius aponeuroses in restored graft of MPFL could utilise the dynamic stability of surrounding muscles to mimic a native structure.

Anatomic and Biomechanical Properties of Flat Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using an Adductor Magnus Tendon Graft: A Human Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

In contrast to the majority of existing techniques for reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), the technique described in this article uses the adductor magnus muscle tendon to gain a flat, broad graft, leaving its distal femoral insertion intact, and does not require drilling within or near the femoral physis. It also allows for soft tissue patellar fixation and could facilitate anatomic MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anatomic and structural properties of the native MPFL and the adductor tendon (AT), followed by biomechanical evaluation of the proposed reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

The morphological and topographical features of the AT and MPFL were evaluated in 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. The distance between the distal insertion of the AT on the adductor tubercle and the adductor hiatus, as well as the desired length of the graft, was measured to evaluate this graft's application potential. Load-to-failure tests were performed to determine the biomechanical properties of the proposed reconstruction construct. The construct was placed in a uniaxial testing machine and cyclically loaded 500 times between 5 and 50 N, followed by load to failure, to measure the maximum elongation, stiffness, and maximum load.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD length of the AT was 12.6 ± 1.5 cm, and the mean distance between the insertion on the adductor tubercle and adductor hiatus was 10.8 ± 1.3 cm, exceeding the mean desired length of the graft (7.5 ± 0.5 cm) by 3.3 ± 0.7 cm. The distal insertion of the AT was slightly proximal and posterior to the insertion of the MPFL. The maximum elongation after cyclical loading was 1.9 ± 0.4 mm. Ultimately, the mean stiffness and load to failure were 26.2 ± 7.6 N/mm and 169.7 ± 19.2 N, respectively. The AT graft failed at patellar fixation in 2 of the initially tested specimens and at the femoral insertion in the remaining 10.

CONCLUSION

The described reconstruction using the AT has potential for MPFL reconstruction. The AT graft presents a graft of significant volume, beneficial anatomic topography, and adequate tensile properties in comparison with the native MPFL following the data from previously published studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given its advantageous anatomic relationship as an application that avoids femoral drilling and osseous patellar fixation, the AT may be considered a graft for MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

[Research progress in femoral tunnel positioning points of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction]

Objective

To review the research progress of location methods and the best femoral insertion position of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction of femoral tunnel, and provide reference for surgical treatment.

Methods

The literature about femoral insertion position of the MPFL reconstruction in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of MPFL, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of femoral tunnel positioning methods were summarized.

Results

The accurate establishment of the femoral anatomical tunnel is crucial to the success of MPFL reconstruction. At present, there are mainly two kinds of methods for femoral insertion: radiographic landmark positioning method and anatomical landmark positioning method. Radiographic landmark positioning method has such advantages as small incision and simple operation, but it can not be accurately positioned for patients with severe femoral trochlear dysplasia. It is suggested to combine with the anatomical landmark positioning method. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no unified positioning standard. In recent years, the use of three-dimensional design software can accurately assist in the MPFL reconstruction, which has become a new trend.

Conclusion

Femoral tunnel positioning of the MPFL reconstruction is very important. The current positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Personalized positioning is a new trend and has not been widely used in clinic, its effectiveness needs further research and clinical practice and verification.

Femoral Origin Anatomy of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex: Implications for Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To report the shape and orientation of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) footprint on the medial femur and describe the difference between the proximal (medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament, MQTFL) and distal (medial patellofemoral ligament, MPFL) fibers.

METHODS

In 20 cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint on the medial femur was exposed. Images of the medial femur were analyzed using ImageJ software. The length and width of the MPFC footprint were described to the nearest 0.1 mm; the angle of its long axis was described relative to the axis of the femoral shaft (0.1°). The footprint's most proximal and distal margins were described in relation to the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle. The differences between each were compared using paired t tests.

RESULTS

17 knees from 10 cadavers were included in this study. The MPFC footprint had a length of 11.7 ± 1.8 mm and a width of 1.7 ± 0.4 mm. The long axis of the footprint was at an angle 14.6° ± 16.6° anterior to the axis of the femoral shaft. The most proximal (MQTFL) fibers originated 7.4 ± 3.8 mm anterior and 1.8 ± 4.7 mm distal to the adductor tubercle and 4.1 ± 2.9 mm posterior and 8.4 ± 5.6 mm proximal to the medial epicondyle. The most distal (MPFL) fibers originated 4.9 ± 4.2 mm anterior and 12.7 ± 4.3 mm distal to the adductor tubercle, as well as 7.1 ± 2.4 mm posterior and 0.5 ± 5.6 mm distal to the medial epicondyle. The distal margin of the femoral MPFC footprint was 10.9 ± 1.7 mm distal (p < .001) and 2.6 ± 3.2 mm more posterior (p = .005) than the proximal margin.

CONCLUSIONS

The femoral footprint of the MPFC has a length almost 7 times greater than its width, with the distal margin being 10.9 mm distal and 2.6 mm posterior to the proximal margin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This differential anatomy within the femoral origin suggests that MPFL and MQTFL reconstruction may require separate positions of femoral fixation to recreate the anatomy of these fibers.

Fluoroscopic guided tunnel placement during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is not accurate in patients with severe trochlear dysplasia

PURPOSE

Accurate femoral tunnel placement is of great importance during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of trochlear dysplasia on the accuracy of fluoroscopic guided femoral tunnel placement.

METHODS

CT-Scans of 30 knees (five with regular shaped trochlea, 10 with a Type A and five each with a Type B, C, or D trochlear dysplasia) were imported into the image analysis platform MeVisLab. A 3D Bone Volume Rendering (VR) and a virtual lateral radiograph was created. The anatomic femoral MPFL insertion was identified on the 3D VR. On virtual lateral radiographs, the MPFL insertion was identified based on landmarks described by Schöttle et al. using three different perspectives: Best possible overlap of the femoral condyles (BC) and a tangent along posterior border of the posterior femoral cortex (pBC); a tangent along the anterior border of the posterior cortex (aBC); and best possible overlap of the distal part of the posterior femoral cortex (BF). Distances between the anatomic attachment and radiographically obtained insertions were measured on the 3D VR and compared according to the type of trochlear dysplasia.

RESULTS

Significantly lower accuracy of fluoroscopy guided tunnel placement in MPFL reconstruction was found in knees with Type C and D dysplasia. This effect was observed irrespectively from the radiologic perspective (pBC, aBC, and FC). In the pBC view (highest accuracy), the mean distance from the centre of the anatomic MPFL attachment to the radiographically defined location was 4.3 mm in knees without trochlear dysplasia and increased to 4.8 mm in knees with Type A dysplasia, 3.8 mm in knees with Type B dysplasia, 6.7 mm (p < 0.001) in knees with Type C dysplasia, and 7.3 mm (p < 0.001) in knees with Type D dysplasia.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic landmark-based femoral tunnel placement in the pBC view provides highest accuracy in knees with a normal shaped trochlea or low grade trochlear dysplasia. In patients with severe dysplasia, fluoroscopy guided tunnel placement has a low accuracy, exceeding a critical threshold of 5 mm distance to the anatomic MPFL insertion irrespective of the radiographic perspective. In these patients, utilization of anatomic landmarks may be beneficial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Properties and Function of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

As the main passive structure preventing patellar lateral subluxation, accurate knowledge of the anatomy, material properties, and functional behavior of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is critical for improving its reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To provide a state-of-the-art understanding of the properties and function of the MPFL by undertaking a systematic review and statistical analysis of the literature.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

On June 26, 2018, data for this systematic review were obtained by searching PubMed and Scopus. Articles containing numerical information regarding the anatomy, mechanical properties, and/or functional behavior of the MPFL that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed, recorded, and statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 55 articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. The MPFL presented as a fanlike structure spanning from the medial femoral epicondyle to the medial border of the patella. The reported data indicated ultimate failure loads from 72 N to 208 N, ultimate failure elongation from 8.4 mm to 26 mm, and stiffness values from 8.0 N/mm to 42.5 N/mm. In both cadaveric and in vivo studies, the average elongation pattern demonstrated close to isometric behavior of the ligament in the first 50° to 60° of knee flexion, followed by progressive shortening into deep flexion. Kinematic data suggested clear lateralization of the patella in the MPFL-deficient knee during early knee flexion under simulated muscle forces.

CONCLUSION

A lack of knowledge regarding the morphology and attachment sites of the MPFL remains. The reported mechanical properties also lack consistency, thus requiring further investigations. However, the results regarding patellar tracking confirm that the lack of an MPFL leads to lateralization of the patella, followed by delayed engagement of the trochlear groove, plausibly leading to an increased risk of patellar dislocations. The observed isometric behavior up to 60° of knee flexion plausibly suggests that reconstruction of the ligament can occur at flexion angles below 60°, including the 30° and 60° range as recommended in previous studies.

The Ribbon-shaped Femoral Footprint of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: Implications for Reconstruction

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary static stabilizer to lateral translation of the patella and serves as part of the medial patellar soft tissue restraints. Because of the sensitivity of MPFL graft function after reconstruction to the position of the femoral tunnel, many studies have aimed to identify the exact point of the femoral origin, as well as defining techniques to confirm this position intraoperatively. We describe the ribbon-shaped footprint of the MPFL on the medial femur and the associated difficulty in identifying the origin as a single "point." Varying isometry and biomechanical functions have been shown to exist within the most proximal and most distal fibers, suggesting the function of the MPFL may not be fully recreated with a tubular graft in a round tunnel. We review the anatomical descriptions of the elongated femoral footprint of the MPFL and describe our surgical technique to recreate this.

Recognition of evolving medial patellofemoral anatomy provides insight for reconstruction

PURPOSE

The scientific literature concerning the anatomy of medial soft-tissue stabilizers of the patella is growing exponentially. Much of the surgical literature has focused on the role of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and techniques to reconstruct it, yet our understanding of its anatomy has evolved during the past several years. Given this, we report on the current understanding of medial patellofemoral anatomy and implications for reconstruction.

METHODS

Current and historical studies of medial patellar anatomy were reviewed, which include the MPFL and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL), as well as that of the distal medial patellar restraints, the medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML). In addition to the reported findings, the authors' anatomic descriptions of each ligament during their dissections were identified and recorded.

RESULTS

Despite the name of the MPFL, which implies that the ligament courses between the femur and patella, recent studies have highlighted the proximal MPFL fibers that attach to the quadriceps tendon, known as the MQTFL. The MPFL and MQTFL have also been referred to as the medial patellofemoral complex, reflecting the variability in anatomical attachment sites. The MPFL accounts for only half of the total restraint to lateral patellar displacement, and the remaining contributions to patellar stability are derived from the combination of the MPTL and MPML, which function primarily in greater degrees of knee flexion.

CONCLUSION

The understanding of the complexity of the medial patellar stabilizers continues to evolve. Although MPFL reconstruction is gaining wide acceptance as a procedure to treat patellar instability, it is important to recognize the complex and changing understanding of the anatomy of the medial soft-tissue stabilizers and the implications for reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Combined Soft Tissue Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament

Patellar dislocation is a major orthopaedic concern in pediatric and adult populations, with both conservative and surgical options available. Several surgical techniques of the combined or isolated reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament are described in the literature using different grafts, locations, and types of fixations, providing different advantages and disadvantages. New recent developments in cadaveric dissection studies have unveiled the importance of structures that were neglected until recently, such as the medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament, which provides a connection between the medial femur and the quadriceps tendon component of the knee extensor mechanism. Hence, we present a surgical technique with combined reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament and medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament without the use of hardware and with no need for patellar or femoral drilling (no physis compromise or risk of patellar fracture), which can be used concomitantly with other bony procedures.

Descriptive and dynamic study of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL)

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the anatomy of the medial patellar retinaculum and the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) to provide an anatomical validation of a pediatric reconstruction technique.

METHODS

Fifteen knees were dissected to study the MPFL and its relationship with the medial patellar retinaculum and the femoral insertion of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). The distances between the insertions of the MPFL of eight knees, and the patellar insertion of the MPFL and the femoral insertion of the MCL of four knees, were measured during the flexion to evaluate the isometricity of the native and reconstructed MPFL.

RESULTS

The medial patellar retinaculum includes four structures: the fascia, fibrous expansions of the vastus muscles, the MPFL and the medial patellomeniscal ligament. The femoral insertion of the MPFL was located just behind the femoral insertion of the MCL in 12 knees. During flexion, the distance between the insertion on the upper patella and the femoral insertion of the MPFL increased while the distance between the insertion on the lower patella and the femoral insertion of the MPFL decreased. The variation in the distances measured during the flexion was greater between the MPFL insertions (n_sup = 6.5 mm, n_inf = 6.5 mm) than between the patellar insertion of the MPFL and the femoral insertion of the MCL (n'_sup = 2.5 mm, n'_inf = 5.75 mm).

CONCLUSION

The MPFL is not isometric. Even though the results were obtained from knees of elderly specimens, this study demonstrates reconstruction of the MPFL should take into account its anatomy and biomechanical role in the knee.

Editorial Commentary: Medial Patellofemoral Complex: Driving a Better Understanding of Medial Knee Anatomy

Although its importance as the prime restraint to lateral patellar instability is undoubted, the anatomy of the medial patellofemoral ligament has never been agreed on. Since it was first described by Warren and Marshall in 1979, most of the anatomic studies confirmed its presence in 90% of the cases, but they usually provide inconsistent descriptions of its femoral and patellar attachments. It is proven that length changes in the reconstructed medial patellofemoral ligament depend principally on the femoral attachment site. Moreover, the femoral attachment site affects the patellar tilt, translation, and joint reaction force. Because of the early inconsistent descriptions of the medial patellofemoral ligament attachment sites, some authors have suggested that its anatomy is not fixed or may be patient specific.

Comparation and evaluation of the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the medial patellofemoral ligament femoral tunnel: a cadaveric and clinical study

Background

In anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, malpositioning of the MPFL femoral tunnel is common. A palpable sulcus reportedly exists at the anatomic femoral attachment of the MPFL. The present study aimed to investigate the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the MPFL femoral tunnel.

Methods

A cadaveric study was first done on 12 knees to evaluate the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the entry points of the MPFL femoral tunnel in comparison with the midpoint and fluoroscopic localization methods. The center of the native MPFL femoral attachment was served as the reference in the cadaveric study. A clinical study was then performed to further evaluate the accuracy of the sulcus localization method in 53 patients (60 knees). Schöttle’s point was served as the reference in the clinical study. Femoral tunnel placement was defined as accurate when it was less than 5 mm from Schöttle’s point. In both the cadaveric and clinical studies, MPFL femoral tunnel placement was assessed on postoperative reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images. In the cadaveric study, the accuracy of different localization methods was compared using analysis of variance.

Results

In the cadaveric study, the mean distances from the native MPFL attachment to the femoral tunnel entry point were 4.2 ± 1.0 mm (range 2.4–5.6 mm), 4.4 ± 1.4 mm (range 1.8–6.6 mm) and 2.9 ± 0.8 mm (range 1.9–4.4 mm) using the midpoint, fluoroscopic, and sulcus localization methods, respectively; this distance significantly differed between the midpoint and sulcus localization methods, and between the fluoroscopic and sulcus localization methods (p ≤ .05). While there were no significant differences between the midpoint and fluoroscopic localization methods (n.s.). In the clinical study, the mean distance between the femoral tunnel and Schöttle’s point was 3.5 ± 1.5 mm (range 0.4–6.1 mm), with accurate tunnel placement achieved in 49 of 60 cases (82%).

Conclusion

The sulcus localization method can accurately guide MPFL femoral tunnel placement. This method might be useful for orthopedic surgeons.

Level of evidence

IV

Electromyography-Driven Forward Dynamics Simulation to Estimate In Vivo Joint Contact Forces During Normal, Smooth, and Bouncy Gaits

Computational models that predict in vivo joint loading and muscle forces can potentially enhance and augment our knowledge of both typical and pathological gaits. To adopt such models into clinical applications, studies validating modeling predictions are essential. This study created a full-body musculoskeletal model using data from the "Sixth Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in vivo Knee Loads." This model incorporates subject-specific geometries of the right leg in order to concurrently predict knee contact forces, ligament forces, muscle forces, and ground contact forces. The objectives of this paper are twofold: (1) to describe an electromyography (EMG)-driven modeling methodology to predict knee contact forces and (2) to validate model predictions by evaluating the model predictions against known values for a patient with an instrumented total knee replacement (TKR) for three distinctly different gait styles (normal, smooth, and bouncy gaits). The model integrates a subject-specific knee model onto a previously validated generic full-body musculoskeletal model. The combined model included six degrees-of-freedom (6DOF) patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints, ligament forces, and deformable contact forces with viscous damping. The foot/shoe/floor interactions were modeled by incorporating shoe geometries to the feet. Contact between shoe segments and the floor surface was used to constrain the shoe segments. A novel EMG-driven feedforward with feedback trim motor control strategy was used to concurrently estimate muscle forces and knee contact forces from standard motion capture data collected on the individual subject. The predicted medial, lateral, and total tibiofemoral forces represented the overall measured magnitude and temporal patterns with good root-mean-squared errors (RMSEs) and Pearson's correlation (p2). The model accuracy was high: medial, lateral, and total tibiofemoral contact force RMSEs = 0.15, 0.14, 0.21 body weight (BW), and (0.92 < p2 < 0.96) for normal gait; RMSEs = 0.18 BW, 0.21 BW, 0.29 BW, and (0.81 < p2 < 0.93) for smooth gait; and RMSEs = 0.21 BW, 0.22 BW, 0.33 BW, and (0.86 < p2 < 0.95) for bouncy gait, respectively. Overall, the model captured the general shape, magnitude, and temporal patterns of the contact force profiles accurately. Potential applications of this proposed model include predictive biomechanics simulations, design of TKR components, soft tissue balancing, and surgical simulation.

Analysis of Graft Length Change Patterns in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction via a Fluoroscopic Guidance Method

BACKGROUND

A fluoroscopic guidance method for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has been widely used to determine the anatomic femoral attachment site.

PURPOSE

To examine the graft length change patterns in MPFL reconstruction with a fluoroscopic guidance method.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Forty-four knees of 42 patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction for the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation were examined prospectively. During surgery, suture anchors were inserted into the proximal one-third and center of the patella. A guide pin for the femoral tunnel was inserted into the position reported by Schöttle et al based on the true lateral view of the knee under fluoroscopic control. Changes in graft length patterns of the proximal and center anchors were examined through 0° to 120° of knee flexion. Favorable changes in length patterns were defined as meeting 2 of 3 criteria: (1) not long during flexion (≤3 mm between 30° and 120° of flexion) and either (2) nearly isometric during flexion between 0° and 90° or (3) slightly long during maximum extension (≤3 mm). Other patterns were considered unfavorable. If the change in length pattern was unfavorable, then the pin for the femoral tunnel was moved to different positions until it was favorable. Knees were separated into the favorable group and the unfavorable group. Differences between the groups regarding radiographic parameters were assessed. Student t test or chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 44 knees, 31 (70.5%) showed favorable patterns. However, 13 knees (29.5%) showed unfavorable patterns; therefore, the position of the pin was changed. The mean ± SD distance from the original position to the final position was 5.3 ± 1.1 mm distal for 7 patients and 5.2 ± 0.4 mm posterodistal for 6 patients. Technical errors, including a nontrue lateral view and the tip of the wire not being in the determined area, were found for 4 of 13 knees in the unfavorable group. There was no statistical difference in radiographic parameters between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The graft length change pattern could be nonphysiologic at the position determined through the fluoroscopic guidance method; thus, caution may be necessary. The change in length pattern should be checked before graft fixation. If the length change pattern is unfavorable, then it is advisable to move it approximately 5 to 7 mm distally or posterodistally from the first position.

Origin and insertion of the medial patellofemoral ligament: a systematic review of anatomy

PURPOSE

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the major medial soft-tissue stabiliser of the patella, originating from the medial femoral condyle and inserting onto the medial patella. The exact position reported in the literature varies. Understanding the true anatomical origin and insertion of the MPFL is critical to successful reconstruction. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine these locations.

METHODS

A systematic search of published (AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library) and unpublished literature databases was conducted from their inception to the 3 February 2016. All papers investigating the anatomy of the MPFL were eligible. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified CASP tool. A narrative analysis approach was adopted to synthesise the findings.

RESULTS

After screening and review of 2045 papers, a total of 67 studies investigating the relevant anatomy were included. From this, the origin appears to be from an area rather than (as previously reported) a single point on the medial femoral condyle. The weighted average length was 56 mm with an 'hourglass' shape, fanning out at both ligament ends.

CONCLUSION

The MPFL is an hourglass-shaped structure running from a triangular space between the adductor tubercle, medial femoral epicondyle and gastrocnemius tubercle and inserts onto the superomedial aspect of the patella. Awareness of anatomy is critical for assessment, anatomical repair and successful surgical patellar stabilisation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of anatomical dissections and imaging studies, Level IV.

Radiographic Location Does Not Ensure a Precise Anatomic Location of the Femoral Fixation Site in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

A frequently used method to determine the anatomic femoral fixation point in the operating room during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the radiographic method. However, the ability of this radiological method to establish an anatomic femoral attachment point might not be as accurate as expected.

Purpose:

(1) To evaluate the accuracy of the radiological method to locate the anatomic femoral fixation point in MPFL reconstruction surgery and (2) to determine the factors influencing the predictability of this method to obtain this objective.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

A total of 100 consecutive 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) knee examinations were performed at 0° of extension in 87 patients treated for chronic lateral patellar instability. For each knee, 2 virtual 7 mm–diameter femoral tunnels were created: 1 using the adductor tubercle as a landmark (anatomic tunnel) and the other according to the radiological method described by Schöttle et al (radiographic tunnel). We measured the percentage of overlap between both tunnels. Moreover, of the 100 included knees, 10 were randomly selected for a variability study.

Results:

Considering an overlap area greater than 50% as reasonable, the radiographic method achieved this in only 38 of the 100 knees. Intrarater and interrater reliability were excellent. There was a trend for female patients with severe trochlear dysplasia to have less overlap. This model accounted for 64.2% of the initial variability in the data.

Conclusion:

An exact anatomic femoral tunnel placement could not be achieved with the radiographic method. Radiography provided only an approximation and should not be the sole basis for the femoral attachment location. Moreover, in female patients with severe trochlear dysplasia, the radiographic method was less accurate in determining the anatomic femoral fixation point, although differences were not statistically significant.

MPFL graft fixation in low degrees of knee flexion minimizes errors made in the femoral location

PURPOSE

To evaluate the appropriate amount of knee flexion in which to secure the graft during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Heavy suture was used to simulate graft tissue during MPFL reconstruction on eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. The sutures were passed through two transverse patellar tunnels and draped over a Kirschner wire at Schöttle's point on the femur. Suture displacement at the location of the wire was measured during knee range of motion from 0 to 135°. The wire's location was then moved to 3 additional locations (1 cm proximal, 1 cm distal, and 1 cm anterior), and the measurements were repeated.

RESULTS

Using Schöttle's point, the suture length did not vary throughout all ranges of knee flexion. The distal location resulted in a greater distance between attachment points (i.e. graft tightened) if the measurements began with the knee flexed and then brought into extension. Conversely, with the proximal location, the opposite occurred as the knee was extended (i.e. graft loosened). For all locations other than Schöttle's point, the amount of initial knee flexion for fixation was directly related to the amount of suture length change when the knee was brought into extension.

CONCLUSION

For non-anatomic femoral MPFL graft fixation locations, suture length (and thus graft length) in full extension becomes increasingly altered if the graft is secured in high degrees of knee flexion. Thus, graft fixation in lower degrees of knee flexion is recommended to minimize over or under tensioning the graft when the knee goes into extension if the graft position is placed in a non-anatomic location. To avoid this problem, fluoroscopy should be used to locate the anatomic footprint of the MPFL insertion. While recognizing the limitations of cadaveric research, this study is the first to provide any data to corroborate the widely used practice of securing the MPFL in lower degrees of knee flexion.

Fluoroscopic control allows for precise tunnel positioning in MPFL reconstruction

PURPOSE

In MPFL reconstruction, anatomical graft positioning is required to restore physiological joint biomechanics and patellofemoral stability. Considerable rates of non-anatomical femoral tunnel placement exist. The purpose of this study was to analyse whether intraoperative fluoroscopic control is applicable to reduce variability of femoral tunnel positioning.

METHODS

Femoral tunnel positions of 116 consecutive MPFL reconstructions applying intraoperative fluoroscopic images were analysed. Tunnel positions were determined by two independent observers according to Schöttle's radiographic measurement method. Mean positions, standard deviations and ranges were calculated to determine the variability of the tunnel positions. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean anterior/posterior distances from the anatomical insertion of the MPFL to the centre of the femoral tunnel were 2.34 mm (range 0.0-5.9 mm) and 1.7 mm (range 0.1-7.3 mm, SD 1.3) for proximal/distal deviations; 95.7 % (111/116) of femoral tunnel positions were found to be within the anatomical insertion area defined by Schöttle. Interobserver tunnel position measurements were highly reliable (ICC: depth 0.979; height 0.979).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that intraoperative fluoroscopic control is a feasible and effective method that enables to create reproducible and precise anatomical femoral tunnel positions in MPFL reconstruction. Accordingly, the routine use of intraoperative fluoroscopy can be recommended. Furthermore, the results indicate Schöttle's method as a reliable method for intraoperative control and postoperative analysis of femoral tunnel positioning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Morphology of insertion sites on patellar side of medial patellofemoral ligament

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to clarify the insertion sites on the patellar side of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL).

METHODS

A total of 35 nonpaired human cadaveric knees were used in this study. After identification of the MPFL, the insertion sites on the patellar side of the MPFL were marked. Three-dimensional images were created, and the location and morphology of these insertion sites were analysed.

RESULTS

The morphology of the insertion sites on the patellar side of the MPFL was consistent. The proximal fibres of the MPFL were inserted to the deep fascia of the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) and medial margin of the vastus intermedius (VI). The distal fibres of the MPFL were inserted to the medial margin of the patella directly. The insertion lengths of the VMO, VI, and patella were 26.7 ± 5.0, 28.5 ± 4.4, and 18.5 ± 4.4 mm, respectively. The rate of the vertical distance from the superior pole of the patella to the superior edge of the MPFL in relation to the total patellar height was 12 ± 4.4 %. At the distal edge, the rate was 58 ± 9.6 %.

CONCLUSION

The insertion sites on the patellar side of the MPFL were consistent. The MPFL inserted into the VMO and VI was significantly longer than into the patella. The clinical relevance of this study is to improve understanding of the anatomy of the insertion sites on the patellar side of the MPFL and the pathophysiology of patellar dislocation.

Visual-palpatory versus fluoroscopic intraoperative determination of the femoral entry point in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Malpositioning of the femoral entry point in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) can lead to abnormal and painful patellar kinematics and loss of flexion. Determination of this point is usually performed by palpation of anatomic landmarks. Accuracy of this method has not yet been investigated. The hypotheses were: 1. palpatory method is not as accurate as fluoroscopically guided method using established radiological criteria; 2. accuracy correlates with surgical experience.

METHODS

Three surgeons of varying experience defined the femoral entry point for the MPFL by palpation in ten cadaveric legs. The blinded procedures were repeated three times, and subjective difficulty of the determination was recorded. Results were documented by fluoroscopy on a true lateral radiograph. The accuracy was assessed using established radiological criteria. Surgical experience was correlated with the results, and confounding or interacting variables were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean deviation from the correct zone for the femoral entry point was 3.5 mm (range 0-18 mm). Twenty-nine percent of all palpatory determinations were inside the correct zone, 47 % were within 5 mm distance from the correct zone, and 23 % were further than 5 mm apart from the correct zone ("outliers"). No significant difference was found between surgeons of varying experience. No correlation was observed between subjective difficulty of the procedure and accuracy of determination.

CONCLUSIONS

The validity of the isolated palpatory determination of the femoral entry point in MPFL reconstruction seems to be insufficient, regardless of surgical experience. Derived from this study, fluoroscopic guidance is used in our clinic by default.

Femoral insertion site in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The optimal femoral insertion point in MPFL (medial patellofemoral ligament)-reconstruction still remains ambiguous. Three-dimensional knee simulations based on computerized tomography (CT) images acquired under physiological loading conditions give further insights to predict the optimal femoral insertion site of the MPFL. The hypothesis of the present study is that the optimal insertion point is not as reliable as thought and is dependent on subject-specific anatomical factors.

METHODS

High-resolution 3D images of the knee were acquired in ten weight-bearing knees of healthy subjects in five flexion angles (0 to 120°). The distance between different femoral insertion points and two defined patellar points was computed in each position to quantify length of respective bundles and isometry of the femoral insertion site.

RESULTS

The median length of both bundles was maximal in full extension (proximal bundle: 62.2mm and distal bundle: 59.9mm). The shortest ligament length was obtained in the flexion position 90° for bundle I (57.3mm) and 30° for bundle II (85.3mm). The calculated most isometric femoral attachment point showed a non-uniform distribution pattern related to anatomic landmarks. The radiographic landmark showed the worst isometric score value compared to virtually defined spots by surgeons and the computed most isometric point.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides results on the MPFL path length under physiological loading conditions using high-resolution bone geometry. The most important finding of this study was that the computed, best isometric femoral insertion point showed a variable anatomical distribution. This suggests that the optimal position for femoral MPFL-graft fixation is patient specific.