R-CVP regimen is active in frail elderly patients aged 80 or over with diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Appropriate Treatment Intensity for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Older Population: A Review of the Literature

Most patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are >65 years of age, with the number of patients expected to increase in the coming years. A comprehensive geriatric assessment that carefully evaluates fitness status and comorbidities is essential for selecting the appropriate treatment intensity. Although generally healthy patients or those <80 years of age may benefit from standard immunochemotherapy, unfit/frail patients or patients >80 years old may require reduced-intensity chemotherapy or less-toxic drugs. Some new drugs are currently being tested as single or combined agents for first-line treatment, aiming to improve the outcomes of conventional chemotherapy. This review systematically collates and discusses the outcomes associated with the use of immunochemotherapy in older patients with DLBCL, as well as considering the impact of full-dose immunochemotherapy on quality of life in older and frail patients, summarizing the rationale for reduced dosing in the older population, and presenting recommendations for selecting patients likely to benefit from reduced dosing. If preliminary efficacy and safety data are confirmed in future clinical trials, non-chemotherapy-based immunotherapy approaches could become an alternative potentially curative option in frail patients and those >80 years of age with DLBCL.

Unmet Needs in the First-Line Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Expert Recommendations From the Asia-Pacific Region With a Focus on the Challenging Subtypes

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accounting for around 30-60% of all cases. The management of DLBCL in Asia has several unmet needs due to the diversity of the population, the heterogeneity of local clinical guidelines for DLBCL and the wide disparity in resources and healthcare systems across different regions. Rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP) is widely recognized as the standard first-line treatment for DLBCL; however, alternative regimens are required to improve patient outcomes in challenging subtypes, such as patients with high International Prognostic Index scores, old/frail patients, and patients with double-hit and double-expressor DLBCL or concurrent central nervous system disease. This review article draws from the expertise of practicing hematologists/oncologists in the region, with the aim of integrating data from current scientific evidence to address the unmet needs and unique socioeconomic challenges faced by challenging high risk patient groups in the Asia-Pacific region.

R-miniCHOP versus R-CHOP in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A propensity matched population-based study

For elderly frail patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), an attenuated chemo-immunotherapy strategy of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-miniCHOP) was introduced as a treatment option as from 2014 onward in the Netherlands. Although R-miniCHOP is more tolerable, reduction of chemotherapy could negatively affect survival compared to R-CHOP. The aim of this analysis was to assess survival of patients treated with R-miniCHOP compared to R-CHOP. DLBCL patients ≥65 years, newly diagnosed in 2014-2020, who received ≥1 cycle of R-miniCHOP or R-CHOP were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry, with survival follow-up through 2022. Patients were propensity-score-matched for baseline characteristics. Main endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and relative survival (RS). The use of R-miniCHOP in DLBCL increased from 2% in 2014 to 15% in 2020. In total, 384 patients treated with R-miniCHOP and 384 patients treated with R-CHOP were included for comparison (median age; 81 years, stage 3-4; 68%). The median number of R-(mini)CHOP cycles was 6 (range, 1-8). The 2-year PFS, OS and RS were inferior for patients treated with R-miniCHOP compared to R-CHOP (PFS 51% vs. 68%, p < .01; OS 60% vs. 75%, p < .01; RS 69% vs. 86%, p < .01). In multivariable analysis, patients treated with R-miniCHOP had higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to patients treated with R-CHOP (HR 1.73; 95%CI, 1.39-2.17). R-miniCHOP is effective for most elderly patients. Although survival is inferior compared to R-CHOP, the use of R-miniCHOP as initial treatment is increasing. Therefore, fitness needs to be carefully weighed in treatment selection.

Looking to achieve cure the first time around for DLBCL patients who are older and/or with co-morbidities

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive but often curable malignancy. Older patients, especially those 80 years and older, have poor outcomes compared to those < 60, likely due to a number of reasons including disease biology, comorbidities, and treatment intolerance. Prospective data informing the treatment of older patients and those with multiple co-morbidities is limited. Here, we intend to review available data for regimens other than standard R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, prednisone) or R-pola-CHP (rituximab, polatuzumab vedotin [pola], cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, prednisone), tools available that may aid in treatment selection, and future directions, including the incorporation of newer treatment modalities into therapy for more vulnerable patients.

New treatment options in elderly patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Most patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) are old (>65 years of age) and this population is expected to increase in the following years. A simplified geriatric assessment based on a careful evaluation of the fitness status and comorbidities is essential to choose the correct intensity of treatment. Fit older patients can benefit from a standard immunochemotherapy, while unfit/frail patients frequently need reduced doses or substitution of particular agents with less toxic ones. This review focuses on new therapies (e.g., polatuzumab vedotin, tafasitamab, bispecific antibodies) that have indicated promising results in relapsed/refractory patients, particularly in cases not eligible to transplant. Some of these new drugs have been tested as single agents or in combinations as first-line treatment, aiming to improve the outcome of the traditional chemotherapy. If preliminary efficacy and safety data are confirmed in future clinical trials, a chemo-free immunotherapic approach could become an alternative option to offer a curative treatment even in frail patients.

How to Treat Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Oncologic and Cardiovascular Considerations

Anthracycline-containing therapy is the cornerstone of frontline treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and autologous stem cell transplantation, and more recently, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are the primary treatment options for relapsed refractory DLBCL. Given these therapies are all associated with cardiovascular toxicities, patients with underlying cardiac comorbidities are severely limited in treatment options. The focus of this review is to outline the cardiotoxicities associated with these standard treatments, explore strategies developed to mitigate these toxicities, and review novel treatment strategies for patients with underlying cardiovascular comorbidities. DLBCL patients with underlying cardiac complications are a high-risk patient population who require complicated management strategies that utilize a multidisciplinary approach with collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists.

Ibrutinib, rituximab, and lenalidomide in unfit or frail patients aged 75 years or older with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 2, single-arm study

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for older adults with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) needs to be further explored due to patient comorbidities, standard immunochemotherapy intolerance, and unfavourable genetic features. We did a phase 2 trial of ibrutinib, rituximab, and lenalidomide (iR2) to evaluate the efficacy and safety in older adult patients with de novo DLBCL.

METHODS

In this phase 2, single-arm study, unfit or frail patients with de novo DLBCL aged 75 years or older were enrolled at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. During the induction phase from cycle 1 to 6, 560 mg ibrutinib was given orally daily throughout each 21-day treatment cycle, 375 mg/m² rituximab was given intravenously on day 1, and 25 mg lenalidomide was given orally daily from day 1 to 10 in each cycle. Patients who had a complete response after induction were given another 6 cycles of lenalidomide maintenance (25 mg orally daily from day 1 to 10 every 21 days from cycle 7 to 12). The primary endpoint was complete response rate after 6 cycles or at the end of the induction treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03949062.

FINDINGS

Between May 15, 2019, and May 8, 2020, a total of 30 patients were enrolled. The end of induction complete response rate was 56·7% (95% CI 37·4-74·5), and overall response rate was 66·7% (95% CI 47·2-82·7). With a median follow-up of 27·6 months (IQR 23·9-29·6), the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 53·3% (95% CI 34·3-69·1) and the 2-year overall survival rate was 66·7% (95% CI 46·9-80·5). The main grade 3-4 haematological adverse events were neutropenia (seven patients [23%]), thrombocytopenia (three patients [10%]), and anaemia (two patients [7%]). The most common grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse event was pulmonary infection (seven patients [23%]). Atrial fibrillation was observed in three (10%) patients, including one grade 2 and two grade 3.

INTERPRETATION

A chemotherapy-free iR2 regimen is clinically effective and safe and warrants further investigation in phase 3 trials as first-line treatment in older adult patients with DLBCL.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Municipal Education Commission Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support, Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center, and Multicenter Clinical Research Project by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.

Oncological Treatment-Related Fatigue in Oncogeriatrics: A Scoping Review

Simple Summary

Fatigue in older patients has multiple etiologies, as this symptom may be cancer-related, treatment-related, age-related, or part of frailty syndrome. Physicians need to identify this symptom and understand its risk factors but also evaluate the risk/benefit ratio of cancer treatments considering the risk of impairing the patient’s quality of life. This scoping review was aimed to present the level of information currently available on any-grade fatigue and grade 3 or more fatigue for each cancer treatment regimen, either in general or in older populations, for the most prevalent tumors.

Abstract

Fatigue is a highly prevalent symptom in both cancer patients and the older population, and it contributes to quality-of-life impairment. Cancer treatment-related fatigue should thus be included in the risk/benefit assessment when introducing any treatment, but tools are lacking to a priori estimate such risk. This scoping review was designed to report the current evidence regarding the frequency of fatigue for the different treatment regimens proposed for the main cancer indications, with a specific focus on age-specific data, for the following tumors: breast, ovary, prostate, urothelium, colon, lung and lymphoma. Fatigue was most frequently reported using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) versions 3 to 5. A total of 324 regimens were analyzed; data on fatigue were available for 217 (67%) of them, and data specific to older patients were available for 35 (11%) of them; recent pivotal trials have generally reported more fatigue grades than older studies, illustrating increasing concern over time. This scoping review presents an easy-to-understand summary that is expected to provide helpful information for shared decisions with patients regarding the anticipation and prevention of fatigue during each cancer treatment.

Management of elderly patients with malignant lymphoma

More than half of patients with malignant lymphoma are 65 years old or older. The outcome for older patients is poorer than that for younger patients. A poor prognosis is associated with heterogeneity and consists of physical function, performance status, poor nutritional status and various comorbidities. Therefore, attention should be given to serious treatment-related toxicities. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is the most frequently diagnosed type of malignant lymphoma. Most patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma can be potentially cured with the current standard chemotherapeutic regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone. However, a reduced-dose regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone or alternative treatment options might be suitable for older patients who are frail or unfit and have cardiac comorbidities. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is a potential tool for determining an appropriate therapeutic approach for each older patient. Follicular lymphoma is the second most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and the disease course is usually characterized by an indolent clinical course. Advanced follicular lymphoma with a high tumor burden has historically been treated with chemoimmunotherapy, but the treatment goal for older patients is relief of symptoms. Incorporating novel targeted agents such as brentuximab vedotin into therapies for older Hodgkin lymphoma patients might be a promising alternative to the anthracycline-containing regimen.

TRAIL Score: A Simple Model to Predict Immunochemotherapy Tolerability in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE

Rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) represents the standard of care for first-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, many patients are unable to tolerate R-CHOP and have inferior outcomes. This study aimed to develop a practical tool to help physicians identify patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL unlikely to tolerate a full course of R-CHOP.

METHODS

We developed a predictive model (Tolerability of R-CHOP in Aggressive Lymphoma [TRAIL]) on the basis of a training data set from the phase III GOYA trial (obinutuzumab with CHOP v R-CHOP in 1L DLBCL) using a composite binary end point, identifying patients who prematurely stopped or required reductions of R-CHOP. Candidate predictive variables were selected on the basis of known baseline characteristics that contribute to patient frailty, comorbidity, and/or chemotherapy toxicity. TRAIL was developed using an iterative trial-and-error modeling process to fit a logistic regression model. The final model was evaluated for robustness using a GOYA holdout data set and the phase III MAIN (R-CHOP with or without bevacizumab in 1L DLBCL) R-CHOP-21 data set as external validation.

RESULTS

TRAIL includes four simple predictors available in the routine clinical setting: Charlson Comorbidity Index, presence of cardiovascular disease or diabetes, serum albumin, and creatinine clearance. Model generalization performance estimated by the area under the curve was around or above 0.70 across GOYA training, GOYA holdout, and MAIN data sets. Classifying patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories, the proportion of patients experiencing a tolerability event was 3.3%, 12.4%, and 32.9%, respectively, in GOYA holdout, and 9.7%, 9.7%, and 34.2%, respectively, in MAIN.

CONCLUSION

TRAIL may be useful as a clinical decision support tool for treatment decisions in patients with DLBCL who may not tolerate standard chemoimmunotherapies.

Impact of therapeutic management and geriatric evaluation on patient of eighty years and older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma on survival: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive disease. The first-line treatment is well defined in young patients; however, in oldest old patients treatment remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of therapeutics management and geriatric evaluation on survival in aged patients with DLBCL.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed and COCHRANE databases of published report on elderly patients (median age 80 and above) with DLBCL, from January 2002 to January 2020.

RESULTS

We included 32 studies (6 prospective and 26 retrospective). Patients treated with anthracyclines-containing chemoimmunotherapy had a 2-year overall survival (OS) of 59%-74.3% in prospective studies and 48.1-64.6% in retrospective studies. With less intensive treatment without anthracyclines, 2-year OS was 28%-53%. Without specific treatment, median OS was 2 months. History of falls and severe comorbidities were associated with a decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoimmunotherapy with anthracyclines increases survival in selected very elderly patients in comparison with less intensive regimen. Geriatric assessment, in particular altered mobility disorders and severe comorbidities, is predictive of survival and should be associated with the therapeutic decision. More comparative studies are needed to guide the management of frailer patients.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in very elderly patients: Towards best tailored treatment - A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Diffuse large B cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is a potentially curative lymphoma with increasing incidence with ageing. Treatment of elderly DLBCL patients represents a particular challenge due to their comorbidities and performance status.

METHODS

A search for original articles focused on the treatment of elderly DLBCL patients was performed in PubMed database and 633 were found and reviewed. Thirty-eight studies meeting our inclusion criteria were published since 2007.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were retrospective and 25 phase II/III clinical trials. Most of them investigated the efficacy of dose-adjusted R-CHOP regimen. Alternative therapeutic drugs together with geriatric assessment were also evaluated. For fit patients aged 80 and over, the strongest evidence favours R-miniCHOP regimen.

CONCLUSION

A dose-adjusted R-CHOP may be the recommended treatment in elderly DLBCL patients. New tools such as the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment provide useful guidance for treatment choice, based on comorbidities and frailty index of this group.

Current treatment options for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma in elderly and frail patients: practical considerations for the hematologist

Treatment decisions for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma in elderly and frail patients still remain challenging. The heterogeneity of elderly patients consists of various physical and psychological states, coexisting comorbidities as well as frailty and socioeconomic status. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients is efficient and necessary for risk stratification to identify fit patients without cardiac comorbidities who can tolerate curative treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) and those who are not suitable for a standard regimen. If anthracycline-containing therapy is not feasible, alternative treatment options have to be carefully evaluated and individual risk factors have to be considered.

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Elderly: Current Approaches

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may face challenges in treatment due to comorbidities and tolerance of chemotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Older patients are at increased risk for treatment-related toxicity if they are unfit or frail by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA); however, treatment with non-anthracycline chemotherapy is associated with inferior outcomes in fit and unfit patients. Many older patients remain curable with standard R-CHOP chemotherapy. Careful assessment of frailty, function, and comorbidities using CGA may aid clinicians in initial therapy choices.

Chemotherapy combinations for B-cell lymphoma and chemo-free approach in elderly patients: an update on best practice

INTRODUCTION

Elderly patients represent a consistent portion of new diagnoses of B cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL). The treatment approach in this setting can be challenging for clinicians due to treatment toxicities and patients' comorbidities to deal with. Immunochemotherapy still represents the main option in the front-line setting for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), with different options to choose depending on patient characteristics. In the last decade, a number of new drugs and combinations have been investigated, demonstrating efficacy and safety even in the older population and extending the spectrum of treatment choices for this setting.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the majority data in literature on immunochemotherapy regimens and chemo-free approaches available for DLBCL, FL, and MCL in the elderly, both in front-line and relapse/refractory setting, the incoming drugs and how to identify the best option for each patient.

EXPERT OPINION

The therapeutic approach for elderly B-NHL is challenging and a tailored approach guided by a geriatric assessment is mandatory, in order to optimize efficacy and minimize treatment-related toxicities. The more extended use of biological drugs may potentially lead to prolonged survival with reduction of toxicities and improved quality of life.

Complete Regression of Primary Cardiac Lymphoma With Dose-Attenuated R-CVP Chemotherapeutic Regimen

An elderly man was found to have a large right atrioventricular mass and pericardial effusion. He was diagnosed and treated as having primary cardiac lymphoma. A dose-attenuated chemotherapy regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone, with a cytoreductive pre-phase, afforded complete regression of disease with resolution of the patient’s symptoms, and without deterioration in cardiac function or immunosuppression. The patient remains well 12 months after presentation. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Treatment approaches for older and oldest patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma - Use of non-R-CHOP alternative therapies and impact of comorbidities on treatment choices and outcome: A Humedica database retrospective cohort analysis, 2007-2015

INTRODUCTION

We characterized real-world treatment patterns in older (65-74 years) and oldest (75-85 years) patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving initial therapy (R-CHOP, non-R-CHOP regimens). Impact of comorbidities on treatment choice, and overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) were assessed by age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the Humedica database, we identified 1436 newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL who received frontline therapy from 1/07-9/15. The 885 patients ≥65 years of age were further evaluated for baseline demographics, comorbidities, initial therapy, and PFS/OS.

RESULTS

Of 885 patients, 406 (45.9%) were age 65-74, and 479 (54.1%) age 75-85, years. First line therapy was R-CHOP (61.8%) or non-R-CHOP (38.2%). Although Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were similar at baseline, congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction were more common in those receiving non-R-CHOP regimens. Survival outcomes were superior for those receiving initial R-CHOP, versus non-R-CHOP, therapy (median PFS 53.9 versus 27.8 months; two-year PFS 71.2% versus 51.6%, p < .0001; median OS not reached versus 45 months; two-year OS 81.3% versus 62.9%, p < .0001, respectively). Only 10.4% (R-CHOP) and 12.1% (non-R-CHOP) of patients received second line therapies. Two-year OS by age (65-74, 75-85 years) was 66.4% and 39.1%, respectively with R-CHOP (p = .0045), and 74.3% and 54.5%, respectively with non-R-CHOP (p = .004), therapy. Age ≥ 75 years and CCI of 2+ were associated with shorter OS and PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified real-world first line treatment patterns for older patients with DLBCL. Our findings support the feasibility of administering standard R-CHOP therapy, even to oldest patients with DLBCL.

Impact of comorbidity on disease characteristics, treatment intent and outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a Swedish lymphoma register study

BACKGROUND

Comorbidity impacts overall survival amongst patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, associations of comorbidity with lymphoma characteristics, treatment selection and lymphoma-specific mortality are less well known.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of comorbidity on DLBCL characteristics, treatment intent and cause of death.

METHODS

We identified 3905 adult patients diagnosed with DLBCL 2007-2013 through the Swedish Lymphoma Register. We assessed comorbid disease history according to the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Comorbidity data and causes of death were collected through register linkage. Associations were estimated using multinomial regression and flexible parametric survival models.

RESULTS

Overall, 45% of the patients (n = 1737) had a history of at least one comorbidity at DLBCL diagnosis (cardiovascular disease, diabetes and solid cancer were most frequent), and 997 (26%) had a CCI score of ≥2. The relative probability of presenting with poor performance status (PS > 2) was higher amongst comorbid patients [Relative Risk Ratio (RRR)_PS>2 : 2.02, 95% CI: 1.63-2.51]. Comorbid patients had a substantially lower relative probability of receiving curative treatment (RRR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.38-0.61). Amongst all patients, CCI ≥ 1 was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause and lymphoma-specific death after adjustments. Amongst patients selected for curative treatment, comorbidity was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death (HR_CCI>1 : 1.54, 95% CI: 1.32-1.80), but not with lymphoma-specific death (HR_CCI>1 : 1.05, 95% CI: 0.86-1.28).

CONCLUSION

Comorbidity is associated with inferior DLBCL outcome, mainly due to a lower likelihood of receiving treatment with curative intent. Possibly, more comorbid DLBCL patients could be treated with curative intent if comorbid conditions were optimized in parallel.

Low-dose trofosfamide plus rituximab is an effective and safe treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly: a single center experience

Background

Rituximab plus combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is broadly accepted as standard for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nevertheless, there is sparsely data concerning the management of elderly patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of treatment with rituximab and low-dose trofosfamide in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) with DLBCL who were not suitable for R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens or who did not consent to aggressive treatment. The choice regarding the qualification for R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimen was left to the estimation of the treating physicians.

Results

Eleven patients with a median age of 83 years (range, 75–90 years) were included. The age-adjusted international prognostic index was low risk in one patient, low-intermediate in four patients, high-intermediate in three patients, and high risk in 3 patients. All patients were evaluable for response. Five patients (45%) achieved a complete response, three (27%) a partial response, one (9%) stable disease, and two (18%) progressive disease. The estimated 1-yr overall survival was 54.5%, and the estimated 1-yr progression-free survival 45.5%, however, three patients (27%) were alive without evidence of disease at 16–20 months from start of treatment. Main toxicity was leukopenia (36% grade III or IV), whereas grade III/IV non-hematological adverse events did not occur.

Conclusions

Due to its potency and low toxicity, trofosfamide/rituximab might represent an alternative therapy for DLBCL of elderly patients not suitable for R-CHOP. This observation, however, should be confirmed in a larger patient population within a prospective clinical trial.

Treating Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma in the Very Old or Frail Patients

OPINION STATEMENT

R-CHOP has been the standard of care for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), curing approximately 60% of patients for more than 2 decades. However, the optimal treatment of patients who are too frail to tolerate this regimen and/or are not candidates for anthracycline therapy continues to be debated. MInT and GELA trials established addition of rituximab to CHOP in DLBCL but excluded patients older than 80 years. Multiple regimens have been tried with varying success in the very elderly, including R-mini-CHOP, R-mini CEOP, R-split CHOP, pre-phase strategies, and R-GCVP. However, there has not been a randomized trial among these strategies. Although addition of novel agents including ibrutinib, brentuximab vedotin, lenalidomide, and many others on the horizon holds promise in this population, none have been tested in a randomized setting or have results awaited. There is also a lack of a validated and easy to use clinical tool in this population to predict patients who will not tolerate R-CHOP. Identifying patients who will not tolerate R-CHOP early with the help of tools like CGA, along with integrating biology-based treatment (ibrutinib, lenalidomide in activated B cell type DLBCL) is being investigated in this population.

Impact of Anthracyclines on Diabetes Mellitus Development in B-Cell Lymphoma Patients: A Nationwide Population-based Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although anthracyclines are effective chemotherapeutic agents for treating B-cell lymphoma, adverse effects, such as bone marrow suppression and cardiotoxicity, limit their clinical application. We assessed whether anthracycline treatment also increases the risk for diabetes mellitus in patients with B-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

Using data obtained from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database from 2004 to 2011, we compared overall survival and clinical features for B-cell lymphoma patients administered anthracyclines (n = 3147) and those not administered anthracyclines (n = 837). The impact of anthracycline treatment on diabetes risk was further investigated using a Gray's test and multivariate competing-risk regression models in a dose-dependent manner.

RESULTS

Anthracycline administration was associated with a higher incidence of diabetes (HR: 1.75; 95% CI 1.11-2.75; p = 0.0163) after adjustments for age, gender, cumulative dose of prednisolone, and co-morbidities. Cumulative anthracycline doses of 253-400 mg (HR: 2.35; 95% CI 1.41-3.91; p = 0.0010), 401-504 mg (HR: 2.26; 95% CI 1.26-4.05; p = 0.0063), and > 504 mg (HR: 2.29; 95% CI 1.25-4.18; p = 0.0072) increased the incidence density of diabetes in a dose-dependent manner (p = 0.0006). The annual alteration of adapted diabetes complications severity index score was not significantly different between B-cell lymphoma patients with or without anthracycline treatment (p = 0.4924).

CONCLUSION

Anthracycline therapy increases diabetes risk in a dose-dependent manner in B-cell lymphoma patients. Intensive blood glucose monitoring and control should be recommended for B-cell lymphoma patients receiving anthracycline treatment.

Frailty and the management of hematologic malignancies

The majority of blood cancers occur in the elderly. This fact conspires with an aging population in many countries to make rigorous assessment for frailty increasingly important for hematologic oncologists. In this review, we first define frailty and its relevance for patients with hematologic malignancy. Next, we review current data regarding the effect of domains of frailty on outcomes for blood cancers including myelodysplastic syndromes, acute leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphomas such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Finally, after presenting assessment and treatment options for the practicing hematologist, we propose elements of a new research agenda for geriatric hematology: the exchange of age limits for rigorous frailty screening, development of disease-specific measures, and inclusion of functional and patient-reported outcomes alongside survival.

Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in the elderly: standard treatment and new perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common histotype in non Hodgkin lymphoma, with a peak incidence in the sixth decade. The standard treatment for elderly FIT DLBCL patients is Rituximab-CHOP; in unfit and frail patients, chemotherapy at reduced intensity should be considered. Areas covered: In this article, we will review use of standard therapies and new drugs investigated such as immonomudulating agents (IMiDs), Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK), in fit, unfit, frail and very elderly DLCBL patients. Expert commentary: R-CHOP21 in fit DLBCL patients is still the standard of care, while in elderly unfit patients a reduction of doses of cytotoxic drugs or schemes that avoid antracycline should be considered. The Comprensive Geriatric Assesment based in age, comorbidities and functional abilities of daily living is an important tool in elderly, in order to discriminate between fit, unfit or frail patients. Novel drugs represent valid therapeutic options in relapsed/refractory setting so continued participation in clinical trials should be encouraged.