Gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) as salvage chemotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified

Novel clinical risk stratification and treatment strategies in relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma

Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) represents a group of heterogeneous hematological malignancies, which are notoriously challenging to treat and outcomes are typically poor. Over the past two decades, clinical prognostic indices for patient risk stratification have evolved, while several targeted agents are now available to complement combination chemotherapy in the frontline setting or as a salvage strategy. With further understanding of the molecular pathobiology of PTCL, several innovative approaches incorporating immunomodulatory agents, epigenetic therapies, oncogenic kinase inhibitors and immunotherapeutics have come to the forefront. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the progress in developing clinical prognostic indices for PTCL and describe the broad therapeutic landscape, emphasizing novel targetable pathways that have entered early phase clinical studies.

Phase II Trial of Romidepsin as Consolidation Therapy after Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin in Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Romidepsin is an important therapeutic option for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). However, the timing of romidepsin administration remains controversial. The objective of this study was to characterize the safety and efficacy of romidepsin as consolidation therapy after gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) therapy (GDPR). This study of patients treated between March 2019 and March 2021 was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (registration number: jRCT0000000519). If complete response, partial response, or stable disease was confirmed after 2-4 GDP cycles, romidepsin was administered every 4 weeks for 1 year. Seven patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) PTCL (T-follicular helper phenotype [n = 1] and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma [n = 6]) were included in this prospective study (PTCL-GDPR). After a median follow-up of 34 months of patients in PTCL-GDPR, the 2-year overall survival rate was 71%, and the overall response rate after treatment was 57%. Common adverse events in patients with PTCL-GDPR included hematological toxicities such as neutropenia, which improved with supportive treatment. There were no treatment-related mortalities. GDPR might be safe and effective in elderly transplant-ineligible patients with R/R PTCL; however, further investigation is required.

Salvage therapy with brentuximab-vedotin and bendamustine for patients with R/R PTCL: a retrospective study from the LYSA group

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) have a poor prognosis. Bendamustine (B) and brentuximab-vedotin (Bv) have shown interesting results in this setting. However, little information is available about their efficacy in combination. This multicenter and retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of BBv in patients with noncutaneous R/R PTCL among 21 LYSA centers in France and Belgium. The primary objective was the overall response rate. A total of 82 patients with R/R PTCL were included. The best overall response rate (ORR) was 68%, with 49% of patients in complete response (CR). In multivariable analysis, only the disease status after the last regimen (relapse vs refractory) was associated with the response with an ORR of 83% vs 57%. Median duration of response was 15.4 months for patients in CR. With a median follow-up of 22 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.3 and 26.3 months respectively. Moreover, patients in CR, who underwent an allogeneic transplant, had a better outcome than patients who did not with a median PFS and OS of 19.3 vs 4.8 months and not reached vs 12.4 months, respectively. Fifty-nine percent of patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events that were mainly hematologic. BBv is highly active in patients with R/R PTCL and should be considered as a one of the best options of immunochemotherapy salvage combination in this setting and particularly as a bridge to allogeneic transplant for eligible patients.

Cisplatin Loaded Poly(L-glutamic acid)-g-Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol Complex Nanoparticles Combined with Gemcitabine Presents Improved Safety and Lasting Anti-Tumor Efficacy in a Murine Xenograft Model of Human Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

Cisplatin (CDDP) is a highly effective anti-tumor drug with a broad spectrum of activity. However, the clinical efficacy of CDDP-containing regimens is yet unsatisfactory due to the severe dose-related toxicity of CDDP. In a previous study, CDDP nanoparticles (L-CDDP) forms a complex as CDDP with poly(L-glutamic acid)-g-methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) with improved safety compared to CDDP. Herein, a murine xenograft model of human aggressive B cell lymphoma (BCL) was established to explore anti-lymphoma efficiency of L-CDDP combined with GEM. BJAB cells represent an aggressive BCL, which were utilized to explore the anti-proliferative effect, cell apoptosis via CCK-8 test and flow cytometry technology, respectively. Toxicity experiment and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) test were conducted in Kunming mice. Tumor inhibition experiment was conducted at the dose of MTD in SCID beige mice-bearing lymphoma. In this study, the loading capacity and encapsulating efficiency of CDDP in the L-CDDP was 18.3% and 89.7%, respectively, and the hydrodynamic diameter of the prepared L-CDDP was 20.6 nm. The CCK-8 data indicated that the anti-proliferative activity of monodrug groups (GEM, CDDP, L-CDDP) was dose- and time-dependent in BJAB cells. The synergistic effects in anti-lymphoma were detected in these two groups (GEM+CDDP, GEM + L-CDDP). Compared to control group, the proportion of apoptotic cells in experimental groups in BJAB cells was significantly higher at 48 h. Toxicity assays revealed that GEM + L-CDDP regimen had low hematological toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity. Tumor inhibition experiment demonstrated that GEM + L-CDDP group exhibited significant tumor-suppressing effects. Moreover, tumors continued to shrink in GEM + L-CDDP group, while these appeared to grow in the GEM + CDDP group. Finally, tumor necrosis was most prominent in the GEM + CDDP and GEM + L-CDDP groups, as assessed by hematoxylin-eosin staining. In conclusion, compared to CDDP, L-CDDP combined with GEM seriously induces BJAB cell apoptosis. Also, GEM + L-CDDP exhibits low hematotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity. Importantly, GEM + L-CDDP presents lasting anti-lymphoma efficacy in a SCID beige mice-bearing lymphoma.

Gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and dexamethasone (GemDOx) as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma

Background Outcomes of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) remain poor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and dexamethasone (GemDOx) with or without rituximab as salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL and PTCL.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL and PTCL receiving GemDOx as salvage therapy between Jul 1, 2011, and Aug 31, 2017.

Results: Thirty-three (57.9%) patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL and 24 (42.1%) with PTCL were included in this study. The median age was 57 years (inter-quartile range 46-67). The overall response rate (ORR) in DLBCL was 48.5% with 27.3% of complete remission (CR), and the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 21% and 44%. In patients with PTCL, ORR was 50.0% with CR rate of 29.2%; the 2-year PFS and 2-year OS was 28% and 49%, respectively. Common grade 3-4 hematological adverse events were thrombocytopenia (26.3%), anemia (15.7%) and neutropenia (15.7%).

Conclusion: With acceptable efficacy and good tolerability, GemDOx might be a new therapeutic option for relapsed or refractory DLBCL and PTCL.

Combination of crizotinib and chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL)

Our aim was to explore the role of crizotinib, targeted anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), on r/r systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL). The treated group prospectively screened 20 patients. After taking crizotinib in the first week, 16 patients who were tolerant and sensitive received the combination of crizotinib with chemotherapy. The control group included 27 patients receiving chemotherapy in the same hospital during the same period. The objective remission rates of the treated and control group were 81.3% and 74.1% (p = .869), respectively. The progression-free survival rates at two years in treated and control group were 68.7% and 45.0% (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.17-0.99, p < .05), respectively. The overall survival rates at two years in the treated and control group were 86.1% and 78.9% (p = .385, HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.11-2.30), respectively. The main adverse events included elevated transaminase, diarrhea, and vision abnormalities. Thus, the combination of crizotinib with chemotherapy might be effective in ALK-positive and crizotinib sensitive r/r sALCL patients.

Outcomes of GDPT (gemcitabine, cisplatin, prednisone, thalidomide) versus CHOP in newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients

AIM

To compare the outcomes of GDPT [gemcitabine (G), cisplatin (D), prednisone (P), thalidomide (T)] versus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) in treating newly diagnosed PTCL (peripheral T-cell lymphoma).

METHODS

An open-label prospective clinical trial with 153 newly diagnosed PTCL patients conducted between January 2010 and December 2018 was designed. Patients were randomly assigned to the GDPT (77 cases) and CHOP (76 cases) groups. Patients in each group were further divided into four subgroups: PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS); anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL), and other types subgroup, in accordance with pathological patterns. Based on expression of RRM1, TOP2A, TUBB3, and ERCC1, patients were divided into groups with high and low gene expression levels. Clinical characteristics, side effects, efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the basic clinical features or side effects between the GDPT and CHOP groups. The overall response rate (ORR) of the GDPT group was better than that of the CHOP group (66.3% versus 50.0%, p = 0.042), as was the complete remission (CR) rate (42.9% versus 27.6%, p = 0.049). Patients in the GDPT group had a longer PFS and OS than the CHOP group. The 4-year PFS and OS rates in the GDPT group were both superior to those in the CHOP group (63.6% versus 53.0% for PFS, p = 0.035; 66.8% versus 53.6% for OS, p = 0.039). In the GDPT group, the difference in CR between the four subgroups was statistically significant (p = 0.046). In the CHOP group, differences in both CR and ORR among the four subgroups were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). There were also statistically significant differences in CR between patients treated with CHOP and GDPT in the PTCL-NOS subgroup, AITL subgroup, and the other types subgroup (p = 0.015; p = 0.003; p = 0.005, respectively). The data also showed a significant difference in OS among the four subgroups within the GDPT group (p = 0.001). The OS of AITL was shorter than that of the other three subgroups. Four subgroups of CHOP showed a significant difference in PFS (p = 0.019). There was no statistical association between responses and the gene expression levels of RRM1, ERCC1, TUBB3, and TOP2A.

CONCLUSION

The GDPT group had better response rates and prolonged patient PFS and OS. As a promising new regimen, GDPT is expected to become the first-line therapy for PTCL. New agents should be applied to patients who do not achieve good responses with previous treatment, such as those diagnosed with angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This open randomized prospective clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01664975).

A phase I study of romidepsin, gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin combination therapy in the treatment of peripheral T-cell and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; the Canadian cancer trials group LY.15 study†

We investigated GDP (gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m² IV d1, d8; dexamethasone, 40 mg po d1-4; cisplatin, 75 mg/m² IV d1) combined with romidepsin on days 1 and 8 every 21 days to a maximum of six cycles in a standard 3 + 3, phase I dose escalation trial for patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell (PTCL) or diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) lymphoma (NCT01846390). After treating four patients, gemcitabine and romidepsin were given on days 1 and 15 every 28 days. On the 21-day schedule at 6 mg/m² romidepsin, there were three dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) among four patients. On the 28-day schedule, there were no DLTs at the 6, 8, or 10 mg/m² dose. At 12 mg/m², there were four observed grade 3 DLTs among six evaluable patients. Full doses of GDP can be combined with a recommended phase II romidepsin dose of 10 mg/m² if given on a day 1, 15 every 28 days schedule.

Gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dexamethasone (GDP) in combination with methotrexate and pegaspargase is active in newly diagnosed peripheral T cell lymphoma patients: a phase 2, single-center, open-label study in China

Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) are less responsive to anthracycline-containing regimen such as CHOP and carry a poor prognosis. In this prospective study, we investigated gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dexamethasone (GDP) combined with methotrexate (MTX) and pegaspargase (PEG-L) as front-line treatment in PTCL. Eligible newly diagnosed PTCL patients received 4 cycles of the GDP-ML chemotherapy every 28 days. After 4 cycles, responding patients continued to receive either autologous stem cell transplantation or the MTX/cytarabine (MA) regimen for consolidation. This trial is registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR-ONC-12002055). A total of 65 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 38.5 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 55.4%, and complete remission rate (CR) was 33.8%. The median overall survival (OS) was 16 months, and the 1-year and 2-year OS were 59.1% and 38.2%, respectively. The median PFS was only 8 months. The main adverse event was hematologic toxicity: 50% patients showed grade III/IV neutropenia. GDP-ML for the first-line treatment of PTCL patients is an effective induction regimen compared with standard CHOP, and the toxicity was more significant but acceptable. However, future studies exploring new drug combinations are warranted to overcome relapse after remission. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02987244.

CHOP versus GEM-P in previously untreated patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (CHEMO-T): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial

BACKGROUND

Outcomes with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) or CHOP-like chemotherapy in peripheral T-cell lymphoma are poor. We investigated whether the regimen of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) was superior to CHOP as front-line therapy in previously untreated patients.

METHODS

We did a phase 2, parallel-group, multicentre, open-label randomised trial in 47 hospitals: 46 in the UK and one in Australia. Participants were patients aged 18 years and older with bulky (tumour mass diameter >10 cm) stage I to stage IV disease (WHO performance status 0-3), previously untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma, enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, or hepatosplenic γδ T-cell lymphoma. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) stratified by subtype of peripheral T-cell lymphoma and international prognostic index to either CHOP (intravenous cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 [maximum 2 mg] on day 1, and oral prednisolone 100 mg on days 1-5) every 21 days for six cycles; or GEM-P (intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 15, and oral or intravenous methylprednisolone 1000 mg on days 1-5) every 28 days for four cycles. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a CT-based complete response or unconfirmed complete response on completion of study chemotherapy, to detect a 20% superiority of GEM-P compared with CHOP, assessed in all patients who received at least one cycle of treatment and had an end-of-treatment CT scan or reported clinical progression as the reason for stopping trial treatment. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01719835) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2011-004146-18).

FINDINGS

Between June 18, 2012, and Nov 16, 2016, we randomly assigned 87 patients to treatment, 43 to CHOP and 44 to GEM-P. A planned unmasked review of efficacy data by the independent data monitoring committee in November, 2016, showed that the number of patients with a confirmed or unconfirmed complete response with GEM-P was non-significantly inferior compared with CHOP and the trial was closed early. At a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 16·6-38·4), 23 patients (62%) of 37 assessable patients assigned to CHOP had achieved a complete response or unconfirmed complete response compared with 17 (46%) of 37 assigned to GEM-P (odds ratio 0·52, 95% CI 0·21-1·31; p=0·164). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or worse in both groups were neutropenia (17 [40%] with CHOP and nine [20%] with GEM-P), thrombocytopenia (4 [10%] with CHOP and 13 [30%] with GEM-P, and febrile neutropenia (12 [29%] with CHOP and 3 [7%] with GEM-P). Two patients (5%) died during the study, both in the GEM-P group, from lung infections.

INTERPRETATION

The number of patients with a complete response or unconfirmed complete response did not differ between the groups, indicating that GEM-P was not superior for this outcome. CHOP should therefore remain the reference regimen for previously untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

FUNDING

Bloodwise and the UK National Institute of Health Research.

T-cell lymphoma with abundant CD20 expression showing a good response to rituximab with gemcitabine, oxiplatin, and L-asparaginase (R-pGEMOX): A case report

RATIONALE

T-cell lymphoma is a neoplasm that expresses markers of T-cell or natural killer cell (NK)-origin but not those of B-cell origin. Although B-cell lymphoma with abundant expression of T-cell markers exist, the opposite is very rare. Therefore, little is known about this subtype of lymphoma, including its treatment and prognosis.

CASE REPORT

A 65-year-old man was diagnosed with T-cell lymphoma with abundant CD20 expression. He was refractory to cyclophosphamide + epirubicin + vincristine + prednisone + etoposide (CHOPE), ifosfamide + cisplatin + etoposide + dexamethasone (DICE), and hyper-cyclophosphamide + vincristine + epirubicin + dexamethasone (CVAD) chemotherapy. The patient was also treated with prednisone + thalidomide + chidamide, which was also not effective. Upon admission to our department, he was administered a rituximab + gemcitabine + oxiplatin + L-asparaginase (R-pGEMOX) regimen and achieved partial remission.

LESSONS

CD20-positive T-cell lymphoma is a very rare type of lymphoma that is refractory to CHOP-like regimens alone. Rituximab may be effective in patients showing abundant CD20 expression, and an R-pGEMOX regimen will likely be effective, even in refractory/recurrent patients.