The impact of antimicrobial prophylaxis in morbidity and infections during azacitidine treatment

Infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Infectious complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Preventing infections could significantly improve both survival and quality of life. Unfortunately, both infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with MDS are incompletely assessed due to the heterogeneity of disorders included in each publication, changing definitions over time, and lack of standardized prophylaxis practices. Despite these limitations, some basic statements can be made. Infections in MDS are associated with neutropenia. Patients with lower-risk (LR) MDS tend to have fewer infections compared to patients with higher-risk (HR) MDS, which may be related to the different prevalence of neutropenia in the 2 groups. Pneumonia is the most common infection, and bacteria are the most common pathogens. Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are uncommon. Reactivation of latent viruses are rare. With the limited data available, we agree that antibacterial prophylaxis can be considered in patients with HR-MDS during severe neutropenia and early cycles of therapy when infections are most likely to occur. Given the low prevalence of IFI and viral reactivation, antimicrobial prophylaxis for these pathogens is less likely to be advantageous for most patients, although antifungal prophylaxis with activity against mold is commonly used in patients with persistent, profound neutropenia. Ultimately, improved data collection regarding infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis is needed to improve care for patients with MDS.

No advantage of antimicrobial prophylaxis in AML/MDS/CMML patients treated with azacitidine-a prospective multicenter study by the Polish Adult Leukemia Group

Introduction

Infections represent one of the most frequent causes of death of higher-risk MDS patients, as reported previously also by our group. Azacitidine Infection Risk Model (AIR), based on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependency, neutropenia <0.8 × 109/L, platelet count <50 × 109/L, albumin <35g/L, and ECOG performance status ≥2 has been proposed based on the retrospective data to estimate the risk of infection in azacitidine treated patients.

Methods

The prospective non-intervention study aimed to identify factors predisposing to infection, validate the AIR score, and assess the impact of antimicrobial prophylaxis on the outcome of azacitidine-treated MDS/AML and CMML patients.

Results

We collected data on 307 patients, 57.6 % males, treated with azacitidine: AML (37.8%), MDS (55.0%), and CMML (7.1%). The median age at azacitidine treatment commencement was 71 (range, 18-95) years. 200 (65%) patients were assigned to higher risk AIR group. Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis was used in 66.0%, 29.3%, and 25.7% of patients, respectively. In total, 169 infectious episodes (IE) were recorded in 118 (38.4%) patients within the first three azacitidine cycles. In a multivariate analysis ECOG status, RBC transfusion dependency, IPSS-R score, and CRP concentration were statistically significant for infection development (p < 0.05). The occurrence of infection within the first three azacitidine cycles was significantly higher in the higher risk AIR group - 47.0% than in lower risk 22.4% (odds ratio (OR) 3.06; 95% CI 1.82-5.30, p < 0.05). Administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis did not have a significant impact on all-infection occurrence in multivariate analysis: antibacterial prophylaxis (OR 0.93; 0.41-2.05, p = 0.87), antifungal OR 1.24 (0.54-2.85) (p = 0.59), antiviral OR 1.24 (0.53-2.82) (p = 0.60).

Discussion

The AIR Model effectively discriminates infection-risk patients during azacitidine treatment. Antimicrobial prophylaxis does not decrease the infection rate.

Should patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with venetoclax-based regimens receive antifungal prophylaxis?

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a major complication in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving intensive induction chemotherapy, and the use of anti-mold prophylaxis is considered standard of care. On the other hand, the use of anti-mold prophylaxis in AML patients receiving less-intensive venetoclax-based regimens is not well established, basically because the incidence of IFD may not be high enough to justify primary antifungal prophylaxis. Furthermore, dose adjustments in venetoclax are needed because of drug interactions with azoles. Finally, the use of azoles is associated with toxicity, including liver, gastrointestinal and cardiac (QT prolongation) toxicity. In a setting of low incidence of invasive fungal disease, the number needed to harm would be higher than the number needed to treat. In this paper we review the risk factors for IFD in AML patients receiving intensive chemotherapeutic regimens, the incidence and risk factors for IFD in patients receiving hypomethylating agents alone, and in patients receiving less-intensive venetoclax-based regimens. We also discuss potential problems with the concomitant use of azoles, and present our perspective on how to manage AML patients receiving venetoclax-based regimens without primary antifungal prophylaxis.

Supportive Care for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes

ABSTRACT

Myelodysplastic syndromes are a heterogeneous group of bone marrow disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, progressive cytopenias, and an innate capability of progressing to acute myeloid leukemia. The most common causes of morbidity and mortality are complications related to myelodysplastic syndromes rather than progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Although supportive care measures are applicable to all patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, they are especially essential in patients with lower-risk disease who have a better prognosis compared with their higher-risk counterparts and require longer-term monitoring of disease and treatment-related complications. In this review, we will address the most frequent complications and supportive care interventions used in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, including transfusion support, management of iron overload, antimicrobial prophylaxis, important considerations in the era of COVID-19 (coronavirus infectious disease 2019), role of routine immunizations, and palliative care in the myelodysplastic syndrome population.

Incidence and predisposing factors of infection in patients treated with hypomethylating agents

OBJECTIVE

Hypomethylating agents may have adverse effects such as cytopenias, cytopenia associated infections and fatality due to infections despite their favorable effects in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). The infection prophylaxis approach is based on expert opinions and real-life experiences. Hence, we aimed to reveal the frequence of infections, predisposing factors of infection and to analyse infection attributable mortality in patients with high-risk MDS, CMML and AML who received hypomethylating agents in our center where routine infection prophylaxis is not applied.

MATERIAL-METHOD

43 adult patients with AML or high-risk MDS or CMML who received HMA ≥ 2 consecutive cycles from January 2014 to December 2020 were enrolled in the study.

RESULTS

43 patients and 173 treatment cycles were analyzed. The median age was 72 years and 61.3 % of patients were males. The distribution of the patients' diagnoses was; AML in 15 patients (34.9 %), high risk MDS in 20 patients (46.5 %), AML with myelodysplasia-related changes in 5 patients (11.6 %) and CMML in 3 patients (7 %). 38 infection events (21.9 %) occurred in 173 treatment cycles. 86.9 % (33 cycles) and 2.6 % (1 cycle) of infected cycles were bacterial and viral infections, respectively and 10.5 % (4 cycles) were bacterial and fungal concurrently. The most common origin of the infection was respiratory system. Hemoglobin count was lower and CRP level was higher at the beginning of the infected cycles significantly (p values were 0.002 and 0.012, respectively). Requirement of red blood cell and platelet transfusions were found to be significantly increased in the infected cycles (p values were 0.000 and 0.001, respectively). While > 4 cycles of treatment and increased platelet count were found to be protective against infection, > 6 points of Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were found to increase the risk of infection. The median survival was 7.8 months in non-infected cycles while 6.83 months in infected cycles. This difference was not statistically significant (p value was 0.077).

DISCUSSION

The prevention and management of infections and infection-related deaths in patients treated with HMAs is crucial. Therefore, patients with a lower platelet count or a CCI score of > 6 may be candidates for infection prophylaxis when exposed to HMAs.

Increased prescription rate of anti-infective agents after diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes

The a priori risk for infections in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is unknown. This study examines prescription rates of anti-infective agents in MDS patients before and after diagnosis, in both in- and outpatient settings, to provide information on infection management in clinical practice. We performed a population-based study using the HemoBase registry, containing data of all MDS patients diagnosed since 2005 in Friesland, the Netherlands. Community and hospital pharmacies provided prescription data from 1995 to 2020. Data were obtained for 203 of 292 patients (70%). Patients received significantly more anti-infective agents, predominantly antibacterials (70%), after diagnosis compared to before: 148.7 defined daily dose/1000 days (DID) (95% CI: 146.9-150.5) and 55.1 DID (95% CI: 54.5-55.8, p < 0.01), respectively, corresponding to median 23.5 and 7.6 treatment days/year. Higher-risk (449.9 DID) and lower-risk patients (129.1 DID) both received significantly more anti-infective agents after diagnosis; comorbidities, neutropenia, and age did not show significant differences relative to prescription rates. Before diagnosis, 10% of patients had infection-related hospital admissions versus 38% after diagnosis. In conclusion, MDS patients received significantly more anti-infective agents compared to before diagnosis. This is the first study that has quantified the prescription rate of anti-infective agents within and beyond the clinical setting in MDS.

Management of infection prophylaxis in Dutch patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, a web-based case vignette questionnaire: the MINDSET study

Objectives

Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The objective of the MINDSET study was to evaluate haematologists' management of infection prevention in MDS patients using a case vignette study and to assess the availability of guidelines.

Methods

We conducted a web‐based, nationwide survey amongst haematologists in the Netherlands between September and December 2021. The survey included a set of case vignettes. In addition, the availability of protocols was evaluated.

Results

Sixty responses were obtained (23.6%). These responses were well distributed across hospital types as well as level of experience. No protocols regarding infection prophylaxis specifically for MDS patients were received. In the case vignette of a 75‐year‐old MDS patient, respondents would primarily prescribe infection prophylaxis in case of recurrent infections (96.7%) and neutropenia (75.0% for absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 0.2 × 10⁹/L and 53.3% for ANC < 0.5 × 10⁹/L), especially in combination with hypomethylating agents (80.0%), lenalidomide (66.7%) or chemotherapy (51.7%). Respondents would predominantly choose antibacterial agents (85.0%), followed by antifungal agents (71.7%).

Conclusions

This study showed diverse reasons and considerations of haematologists regarding whether to prescribe infection prophylaxis in MDS patients. Given the seriousness of infections in MDS patients, patient‐tailored recommendations might be valuable in clinical decision‐making.

Infectious Complications Among Patients With AML Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The incidence and spectrum of infections in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in combination with a hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is not known. Nivolumab is a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor approved in many solid tumors and lymphoma.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 75 adult patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center with relapsed/refractory AML treated with azacitidine and nivolumab or with nivolumab and ipilimumab from March 2016 through March 2020 and described the infectious complications that occurred during their treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-four (85%) patients developed an infection during the study period, and bacterial infections were by far the most common type of infection. A comparison of risk factors and characteristic between the 75 patients on CPIs who developed infection and those who did not found that corticosteroid use (odds ratio [OR], 28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-490; P =.02) and lymphopenia (OR, 4; 95% CI, 1-15.5; P =.04) were significantly associated with infections.

CONCLUSION

Patient with relapsed/refractory AML treated with salvage CPI-based therapy were more likely to develop infections when treated with corticosteroids in the setting of an immune-related adverse event, compared to those who were not.

Relevance of infections on the outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and acute myeloid leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents: a cohort study from the GESMD

Background:

The consequences of infectious toxicity of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) on overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed with high-risk myeloid neoplasms have not been thoroughly investigated.

Objectives:

We aimed to evaluate whether infectious events (IEs) negatively influenced the results of HMA treatment in a real-world setting.

Design:

Observational study.

Methods:

We obtained data from 412 non-selected consecutive patients from 23 Spanish hospitals who were diagnosed with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, or acute myeloid leukemia and were treated with HMA. HMAs received after chemotherapy or stem cell transplant were excluded. All IEs were recorded. Outcomes included OS, modifications to the pre-planned treatment, incidence and characteristics of IEs, hospitalization, red blood cell transfusions, and factors associated with infection.

Results:

The rate of infection was 1.2 per patient/year. Next-cycle delay (p = 0.001) and hospitalizations (p = 0.001) were significantly influenced by IEs. Transfusion requirements during each cycle were significantly higher after infection compared with cycles without infection (coefficient = 1.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26–1.84], p < 0.001). The median number of cycles was lower in patients experiencing any infection during the first four cycles (5 [3–8] versu 8 [5–16], p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, factors associated with lower OS were having any infection during the first four cycles (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.43 [95% CI = 1.09–1.88], p = 0.01), bone marrow blasts ⩾30% (HR = 2.13 [95% CI = 1.14–3.96], p = 0.01), adverse cytogenetics (HR = 1.70 [95% CI = 1.30–2.24], p < 0.001), and platelet count <50 × 10⁹/l (HR = 1.69 [95% CI = 1.3–2.2], p < 0.001). BM blasts >20% (HR = 1.57 [95% CI = 1.19–2.01], p < 0.001) and adverse cytogenetics (HR = 1.7 [95% CI = 1.35–2.14], p < 0.001) were associated with infection, whereas hemoglobin >9 g/dl (HR = 0.65 [95% CI = 0.51–0.82], p < 0.001) and higher platelet count (HR = 0.997 [95% CI = 0.996–0.998], p = 0.016) protected from it.

Conclusion:

HMA infectious toxicity worsens OS, hinders the adherence to antineoplastic treatment and results in significant morbidity. Preventive strategies are fundamental in vulnerable patients.

The effect of 5-azacytidine treatment delays and dose reductions on the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: how to optimize treatment results and outcomes

The regimen of 5-azacytidine for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has remained unchanged since its first approval. Although several modifications have since been made and delays and dose reductions are common especially during the first treatment cycles, there are minimal data on the prognostic effect of these modifications. In this study, based on data from 897 patients with MDS treated with 5-azacytidine recorded in a national registry, the effect of treatment delays and dose reductions on response, transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia, and survival (after 5-azacytidine initiation, OS_T ) were analysed. Delays during the first two cycles were noted in 150 patients (16·7%) and were found to adversely affect OS_T independently of the International Prognostic Scoring System score [hazard ratio (HR), 1·368; P = 0·033] or pre-existing neutropenia (HR, 1·42; P = 0·015). In patients achieving a response, delays before response achievement were correlated with its type (complete remission, 2·8 days/cycle; partial remission, 3·3 days/cycle; haematologic improvement, 5·6 days/cycle; P = 0·041), while delays after response achievement did not have any effect on retention of response or survival. Dose reductions were found to have no prognostic impact. Based on our results, treatment delays especially during the first cycles should be avoided, even in neutropenic patients. This strict strategy may be loosened after achieving a favourable response.

Abnormal platelet phenotypes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Hemorrhage and infection are two main causes of death in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and it is becoming increasingly clear that platelet dysfunction can also affect the process of hemostasis and anti-infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate activation function and immune-related function of platelets in MDS.

METHODS

We included 29 MDS patients and divided them into different subgroups (low-risk group and high-risk group; untreated group and treated group; pretransfusion group and post-transfusion group) according to IPSS-R score, hypomethylating agents (HMAs) therapy, and platelet transfusion history. Platelet light scatter properties, expression of CD41a, activation-associated phenotypes (CD62p and CD63), and immune-associated phenotypes (CD154 and TLR4) were detected by multiparameter flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Expression of CD41a was decreased (P < .05), and no difference was found in platelet light scatter properties between MDS patients and healthy subjects (P > .05). Significantly decreased expression frequency and intensity of activation phenotype CD63 were found in patients with MDS (P < .05). Low-risk MDS showed lower expression frequency while high-risk MDS showed reduced mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD63. Decreased expression of CD154 and TLR4 was found in MDS patients (P < .05) which was significantly elevated after HMAs therapy (P < .05). Particularly, MFI of CD154 and TLR4 reduced in high-risk MDS patients (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Myelodysplastic syndromes patients displayed defective expression of both activation- and immune-associated platelet phenotypes, with differential mechanisms between low-risk and high-risk groups regarding phenotype alterations. The findings confirmed impaired platelet phenotypes in MDS which may assist in the diagnosis and identification of MDS patients.

The Value of Adding Surveillance Cultures to Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis in the Management of Multiresistant Gram Negative Bacterial Infections in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Multidrug resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections (MR-GNBI) are an increasing cause of mortality in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), compromising the success of antineoplastic therapy. We prospectively explored a novel strategy, including mandatory fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, weekly surveillance cultures (SC) and targeted antimicrobial therapy for febrile neutropenia, aimed to reduce infectious mortality due to MR-GNBI. Over 146 cycles of chemotherapy, cumulative incidence of colonization was 50%. Half of the colonizations occurred in the consolidation phase of treatment. Application of this strategy led to a significant reduction in the incidence of GNB and carbapenemase-producing Klebisella pneumoniae (cpKp) species, resulting in a reduction of infectious mortality (HR 0.35 [95%, CI 0.13–0.96], p = 0.042). In multivariate analysis, fluroquinolone prophylaxis in addition to SC was associated with improved survival (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.38–0.79], p = 0.001). Targeted therapy for colonized patients did not overcome the risk of death once cpKp or XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections were developed. Mortality rate after transplant was similar between colonized and not colonized patients. However only 9% of transplanted patients were colonized by cpkp. In conclusion, colonization is a common phenomenon, not limited to the induction phase. This strategy reduces infectious mortality by lowering the global incidence of GN infections and the spread of resistant species.

Predictive Model for Infection Risk in Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Patients Treated With Azacitidine; Azacitidine Infection Risk Model: The Polish Adult Leukemia Group Study

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, including those treated with azacitidine, are at increased risk for serious infections. The aim of our study was to identify patients with higher infectious risk at the beginning of azacitidine treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective evaluation of 298 MDS/CMML/AML patients and included in the analysis 232 patients who completed the first 3 cycles of azacitidine therapy or developed Grade III/IV infection before completing the third cycle.

RESULTS

Overall, 143 patients (62%) experienced serious infection, and in 94 patients (41%) infection occurred within the first 3 cycles. The following variables were found to have the most significant effect on the infectious risk in multivariate analysis: red blood cell transfusion dependency (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-4.79), neutropenia <0.8 × 10⁹/L (OR, 3.03; 97.5% CI, 1.66-5.55), platelet count <50 × 10⁹/L (OR, 2.63; 97.5% CI, 1.42-4.76), albumin level <35 g/dL (OR, 2.04; 97.5% CI, 1.01-4.16), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (OR, 2.19; 97.5% CI, 1.40-3.54). Each of these variables is assigned 1 point, and the combined score represents the proposed Azacitidine Infection Risk Model. The infection rate in the first 3 cycles of therapy in lower-risk (0-2 score) and higher-risk (3-5 score) patients was 25% and 73%, respectively. The overall survival was significantly reduced in higher-risk patients compared with the lower-risk cohort (8 vs. 29 months).

CONCLUSION

We selected a subset with high early risk for serious infection and worse clinical outcome among patients treated with azacitidine.

Infections in Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Relation to Stage and Therapy

Infections remain a significant problem in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in treated as well in non-treated patients and assume a particular complexity. The susceptibility to infections is due, in the absence of intensive chemotherapies, mainly to functional defects in the myeloid lineage with or without neutropenia. Furthermore, MDS includes a heterogeneous group of patients with very different prognosis, therapy and risk factors regarding survival and infections. You should distinguish risk factors related to the disease, like as neutrophils function impairment, neutropenia, unfavorable cytogenetics and bone marrow insufficiency; factors related to the patient, like as age and comorbidities, and factors related to the therapy. When the patients with MDS are submitted to intensive chemotherapy with and without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), they have a risk factor for infection very similar to that of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and mostly related to neutropenia. Patients with MDS treated with supportive therapy only or with demethylating agent or lenalidomide or immunosuppressive drugs should have a tailored approach. Most of the infections in MDS originate from bacteria, and the main risk factors are represented by neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and unfavorable cytogenetics. Thus, it is reasonable to give antibacterial prophylaxis to patients who start the therapy with demethylating agents with a number of neutrophils <500 × 10⁹/L, or with thrombocytopenia and unfavorable cytogenetics. The antifungal prophylaxis is not considered cost/benefit adequate and should be taken into consideration only when there is an antecedent fungal infection or presence of filamentous fungi in the surveillance cultures. Subjects submitted to immunosuppression with ATG+CSA have a high rate of infections, and when severely neutropenic should ideally be nursed in isolation, should be given prophylactic antibiotics and antifungals, regular mouth care including an antiseptic mouthwash.