Ruxolitinib-treated polycythemia vera patients and their risk of secondary malignancies

Incidence rate and risk factors of second primary neoplasms among older patients with hematological malignancies: Insights from a Chinese single-center experience (1997-2021)

Background

Patients with hematological malignancies face an increased risk of developing second primary neoplasms due to various factors, including immune system compromise and chemotherapy-related effects. However, the incidence and associated risk factors in older patients remain poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the incidence, identify risk factors, and evaluate their impact on survival outcomes among older patients with hematological malignancies.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study analyzed data from 163 patients, focusing on the occurrence of second primary neoplasms. Cumulative incidence rates were calculated, and risk factor analysis was conducted using a competing risk model.

Results

Among 124 eligible patients with a total follow-up duration of 572.57 person-years, the incidence rate of second primary neoplasms was 15.72/1000 person-years. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.39-1.48], P = 0.518). History of radiotherapy emerged as a significant risk factor (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 21.61 [2.81-166.14], P = 0.003), whereas regular natural killer (NK) cell infusion was associated with reduced risk (SHR = 3.25 e-8 [9.81 e-9-1.08 e-7], P ＜ 0.001).

Conclusions

These findings underscore the importance of informing older patients with hematological malignancies about the long-term risks of second primary neoplasms. Healthcare providers should carefully weigh risk factors when formulating treatment strategies. The results are valuable for investigating the fundamental principles underlying the occurrence and progression of second primary neoplasms.

Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part I: Cancer Risk. A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have revolutionized the treatment of diverse dermatoses. However, there are concerns regarding their safety, especially the risk of cancer and opportunistic infections. Here, we discuss the risk of cancer associated with the BD and JAKi used in dermatology.

METHODS

A narrative review was carried out. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of cancer associated with BD or JAKi and published between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected.

RESULTS

Multiple large studies have evaluated the association between BD, JAKi and cancer risk. However, there is a lack of prospective, comparative studies. Overall, patients undergoing BD and JAKi present a cutaneous cancer incidence similar to that in the general population. The drugs more strongly associated with non-skin cancer risk were anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNFs) agents and JAKi (especially tofacitinib and oral ruxolitinib). This risk appears to increase with age, the presence of other factors (such as chronic immunosuppression from previous drugs or other comorbidities), and specific diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and myelodysplastic syndrome. Conversely, BD such as interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may even reduce the risk of some visceral and hematological malignancies. In patients with dermatological conditions such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, the risk of malignancies may be lower than in other subgroups, and probably comparable to the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of cancer in patients undergoing BD or JAKi is generally low. This incidence can be higher in elderly patients with RA or myelodysplastic syndrome, and in those undergoing prolonged therapy with tofacitinib or ruxolitinib (oral), or anti-TNF agents.

Skin Malignancies Due to Anti-Cancer Therapies

Skin cancers involve a significant concern in cancer therapy due to their association with various treatment modalities. This comprehensive review explores the increased risk of skin cancers linked to different anti-cancer treatments, including classic immunosuppressants such as methotrexate (MTX), chemotherapeutic agents such as fludarabine and hydroxyurea (HU), targeted therapies like ibrutinib and Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi), mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (MAPKP) inhibitors, sonic hedgehog pathway (SHHP) inhibitors, and radiotherapy. MTX, a widely used immunosuppressant in different fields, is associated with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and cutaneous melanoma (CM), particularly at higher dosages. Fludarabine, HU, and other chemotherapeutic agents increase the risk of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), including cSCC and BCC. Targeted therapies like ibrutinib and JAKi have been linked to an elevated incidence of NMSCs and CM. MAPKP inhibitors, particularly BRAF inhibitors like vemurafenib, are associated with the development of cSCCs and second primary melanomas (SPMs). SHHP inhibitors like vismodegib have been linked to the emergence of cSCCs following treatment for BCC. Additionally, radiotherapy carries carcinogenic risks, especially for BCCs, with increased risks, especially with younger age at the moment of exposure. Understanding these risks and implementing appropriate screening is crucial for effectively managing patients undergoing anti-cancer therapies.

A safety evaluation of ruxolitinib for the treatment of polycythemia vera

INTRODUCTION

Polycythemia Vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm hallmarked by deregulated proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells leading to prevalent expansion of red cell mass, increased rate of vascular events, splenomegaly, disease-associated symptoms, and risk of evolution to secondary myelofibrosis and blast phase. PV is pathogenetically associated with autonomously persistent activation of JAK2, which causes overproduction of blood cells and an inflammatory condition responsible for the clinical manifestations of the disease. Extensively supported by preclinical studies, targeting JAK2-dependent signaling represents a rational therapeutic approach to PV, finally leading to the approval of ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor.

AREAS COVERED (LITERATURE RESEARCH)

We analyzed reports of phase 2 and phase 3 trials with ruxolitinib in PV and relevant literature dealing with efficacy and safety aspects, including most recent real-world reports.

EXPERT OPINION

Ruxolitinib is the only JAK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of PV with well-known efficacy for splenomegaly, symptoms, and potentially reduction of vascular events. The treatment regimen is notably manageable and safe, with the most prevalent side effects primarily encompassing myelosuppression, hyperlipidemia, non-melanoma skin cancer and infections, mainly reactivation of Herpes Zoster. These effects necessitate ongoing surveillance and proactive preventive measures.

Recent progress of JAK inhibitors for hematological disorders

JAK inhibitors are important therapeutic options for hematological disorders, especially myeloproliferative neoplasms. Ruxolitinib, the first JAK inhibitor approved for clinical use, improves splenomegaly and ameliorates constitutional symptoms in both myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera patients. Ruxolitinib is also useful for controlling hematocrit levels in polycythemia vera patients who were inadequately controlled by conventional therapies. Furthermore, pretransplantation use of ruxolitinib may improve the outcome of allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis. In contrast to these clinical merits, evidence of the disease-modifying action of ruxolitinib, i.e., reduction of malignant clones or improvement of bone marrow pathological findings, is limited, and many myelofibrosis patients discontinued ruxolitinib due to adverse events or disease progression. To overcome these limitations of ruxolitinib, several new types of JAK inhibitors have been developed. Among them, fedratinib was proven to provide clinical merits even in patients who were resistant or intolerant to ruxolitinib. Pacritinib and momelotinib have shown merits for myelofibrosis patients with thrombocytopenia or anemia, respectively. In addition to treatment for myeloproliferative neoplasms, recent studies have demonstrated that JAK inhibitors are novel and attractive therapeutic options for corticosteroid-refractory acute as well as chronic graft versus host disease.

Risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer with immunosuppressants, part II: Methotrexate, alkylating agents, biologics, and small molecule inhibitors

In solid organ transplant recipients, skin cancer risk associated with posttransplant immunosuppression has been well-described, and screening practices generally reflect these risks. In addition to agents used posttransplant, other classes of immunosuppressants also have the potential to raise the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) or melanoma. In the present manuscript, the evidence for melanoma and NMSC risk associated with methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, biologic cytokine inhibitors including TNF (tumor necrosis factor)-alpha and interleukin inhibitors, costimulation blockers such as abatacept, integrin inhibitors such as natalizumab, targeted B-cell, and T-cell inhibitors including CD20 (cluster of differentiate 20), CD52, and BTK (Bruton's tyrosine kinase) inhibitors, and JAK (Janus kinase) inhibitors is reviewed. Based on the available data, we recommend regular skin cancer screening for select nontransplant patients receiving immunosuppressive regimens that are shown to raise the risk of NMSC or melanoma. We also offer suggestions for conscientious use of these therapies in high-risk patients. Finally, a comprehensive summary of the relative risk associated with each immunosuppressant class and associated recommendations is presented.

Risk of second primary malignancy in patients with primary myelofibrosis: a SEER database study

Prior studies report a greater incidence of second primary malignancy (SPM) among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, although the true risk in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) has not been elucidated. We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to evaluate the risk of SPM in PMF patients and analyzed the effects of sociodemographic factors on the risk of SPM. Out of 5273 patients, 385 patients (7.30%) developed SPM. SPM occurred at SIR of 1.95 (95% CI 1.76-2.15) and AER of 149.01 per 10,000 population. A significantly higher incidence of melanoma (SIR 1.76, 95% CI 1.01-2.86), lymphoma (SIR 3.38, 95% CI 2.28-4.83), and leukemia (SIR 27.19, 95% CI 23.09-31.81) was observed. The risk was significantly higher in patients ≤60 years, males, chemotherapy recipients, within 5 years of PMF diagnosis, and for PMF diagnosed after 2009.

Genetic and immunohistochemical profiling of NK/T-cell lymphomas reveals prognostically relevant BCOR-MYC association

Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL) is an Epstein-Barr virus-positive, aggressive lymphoma with a heterogeneous cell of origin and variable clinical course. Several clinical prognostic indices have been proposed for ENKTL; however, there are few pathological biomarkers. This multi-institutional study sought to identify histologically assessable prognostic factors. We investigated mutation profiles by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemical assessments of expression of MYC, Tyr705-phosphorylated (p-)STAT3, and CD30 in 71 ENKTL samples. The median age of the patients was 66 years (range, 6-100). The most frequent mutations were in STAT3 (27%), JAK3 (4%), KMT2D (19%), TP53 (13%), BCOR (10%), and DDX3X (7%). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed that ENKTLs with STAT3 mutations exhibited higher expression of pSTAT3 and CD30. BCOR mutations were associated with increased MYC expression. Univariate analysis in the entire cohort showed that stage (II, III, or IV), BCOR mutations, TP53 mutations, and high MYC expression (defined as ≥40% positive neoplastic cells) were associated with reduced overall survival (OS). Multivariate modeling identified stage (II, III, or IV) and high MYC expression as independent adverse prognostic factors. In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with anthracycline (AC)-free chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (RT) with curative intent, BCOR but not high MYC expression was an independent adverse prognostic factor. In conclusion, activating STAT3 mutations are common in ENKTLs and are associated with increased CD30 expression. MYC overexpression is, at least in part, associated with deleterious BCOR mutations, and this BCOR-MYC linkage may have prognostic significance, underscoring the potential utility of IHC for MYC in risk stratification of patients with ENKTL.

Real-world analysis of main clinical outcomes in patients with polycythemia vera treated with ruxolitinib or best available therapy after developing resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea

Background

Ruxolitinib is approved for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but its impact on preventing thrombosis or disease‐progression is unknown.

Methods

A retrospective, real‐world analysis was performed on the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to subsequent treatment with ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (BAT; n = 272). Survival probabilities and rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and second primary cancers were calculated according to treatment. To minimize biases in treatment allocation, all results were adjusted by a propensity score for receiving ruxolitinib or BAT.

Results

Patients receiving ruxolitinib had a significantly lower rate of arterial thrombosis than those on BAT (0.4% vs 2.3% per year; P = .03), and this persisted as a trend after adjustment for the propensity to have received the drug (incidence rate ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.02‐1.3; P = .09). There were no significant differences in the rates of venous thrombosis (0.8% and 1.1% for ruxolitinib and BAT, respectively; P = .7) and major bleeding (0.8% and 0.9%, respectively; P = .9). Ruxolitinib exposure was not associated with a higher rate of second primary cancers, including all types of neoplasia, noncutaneous cancers, and nonmelanoma skin cancers. After a median follow‐up of 3.5 years, there were no differences in survival or progression to acute leukemia or myelofibrosis between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

The results suggest that ruxolitinib treatment for PV patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis.

Lay Summary

Ruxolitinib is better than other available therapies in achieving hematocrit control and symptom relief in patients with polycythemia vera who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but we still do not know whether ruxolitinib provides an additional benefit in preventing thrombosis or disease progression.

We retrospectively studied the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to whether they subsequently received ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (n = 272).

Our findings suggest that ruxolitinib could reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis, but a disease‐modifying effect could not be demonstrated for ruxolitinib in this patient population.

Ruxolitinib may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea.

Safety and effectiveness of ruxolitinib in the real-world management of polycythemia vera patients: a collaborative retrospective study by pH-negative MPN latial group

Ruxolitinib is approved for polycythemia vera (PV) patients after failure to previous cytoreductive therapy, based on durable results observed in phase 3 trials. We report a multicenter retrospective study demonstrating the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in real-life setting. Eighty-three patients were evaluated. Median follow-up was 24.5 months (IQR 14.0-29.3). At a 3-month response assessment, ruxolitinib provided significant benefit in reducing hematocrit (HCT) level (p < 0.001), phlebotomy requirement (p < 0.001), leucocytes (p = 0.044), and disease-related symptoms (p < 0.001). The exposure-adjusted rates (per 100 patient-years) of infectious complications, thromboembolic events, and secondary malignancies were 6.9, 3, and 3.7, respectively. Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) were the most frequent (40%) SM type. Lymphoproliferative disorders were not detected. Five (6%) patients permanently discontinued ruxolitinib treatment and four (5%) evolved in myelofibrosis (MF), but none in acute leukemia. The rate of MF evolution per 100 patient-years of exposure was 2.8. In our experience, ruxolitinib confirmed its efficacy and safety outside of clinical trials.

Second Cancer Onset in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: What, When, Why?

The risk of developing a solid cancer is a major issue arising in the disease course of a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Although the connection between the two diseases has been widely described, the backstage of this complex scenario has still to be explored. Several cellular and molecular mechanisms have been suggested to link the two tumors. Sometimes the MPN is considered to trigger a second cancer but at other times both diseases seem to depend on the same source. Increasing knowledge in recent years has revealed emerging pathways, supporting older, more consolidated theories, but there are still many unresolved issues. Our work aims to present the biological face of the complex clinical scenario in MPN patients developing a second cancer, focusing on the main cellular and molecular pathways linking the two diseases.

JAK2 in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Still a Protagonist

The discovery of the activating V617F mutation in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) has been decisive for the understanding of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Activated JAK2 signaling by JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations has become a focus for the development of targeted therapies for patients with MPN. JAK2 inhibitors now represent a standard of clinical care for certain forms of MPN and offer important benefits for MPN patients. However, several key aspects remain unsolved regarding the targeted therapy of MPN with JAK2 inhibitors, such as reducing the MPN clone and how to avoid or overcome a loss of response. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on the structure and signaling of JAK2 as central elements of MPN pathogenesis and feature benefits and limitations of therapeutic JAK2 targeting in MPN.