1
|
Gascón P, Harbeck N, Rapoport BL, Anderson R, Brueckmann I, Howe S, Aapro M. Filgrastim biosimilar (EP2006): A review of 15 years' post-approval evidence. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 196:104306. [PMID: 38401695 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Filgrastim is approved for several indications, including reduction of the incidence and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and for stem cell mobilization. The filgrastim biosimilar, EP2006, has been available in Europe since 2009, and in the United States since 2015. In this time, preclinical and clinical data used to support the approval of EP2006 have been published. These data established the biosimilarity of EP2006 to reference filgrastim in terms of structure, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Additional real-world evidence studies have also demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety of EP2006 compared with reference filgrastim, both in the reduction of neutropenia and in stem cell mobilization in clinical practice. This review summarizes these preclinical, clinical, and real-world data, as well as the available cost-effectiveness data, for EP2006 since its approval 15 years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pere Gascón
- Division of Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic, Casanova 143, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department OB&GYN and Center for hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Bernardo L Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, 129 Oxford Road, Johannesburg 2196, South Africa; Department of Immunology, Pathology Building, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Ronald Anderson
- Department of Immunology, Pathology Building, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Ines Brueckmann
- Sandoz Group AG, Global Medical Affairs, Industriestr. 25, Holzkirchen D-83607, Germany
| | - Sebastian Howe
- Sandoz Group AG, Global Medical Affairs, Industriestr. 25, Holzkirchen D-83607, Germany.
| | - Matti Aapro
- Cancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Route du Muids 3, Genolier 1272, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marchesi F, Terrenato I, Papa E, Tomassi M, Falcucci P, Gumenyuk S, Palombi F, Pisani F, Renzi D, Romano A, Spadea A, Regazzo G, Rizzo MG, De Rienzo M, Ripellino C, Sgromo S, Viggiani C, Ponte E, Kayal R, Cordone I, Foddai ML, Mengarelli A. Efficacy and safety of biosimilar Peg-filgrastim after autologous stem cell transplant in myeloma and lymphoma patients: a comparative study with biosimilar Filgrastim, Lenograstim, and originator Peg-filgrastim. Ann Hematol 2024; 103:947-956. [PMID: 38189833 PMCID: PMC10867069 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05604-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Data about biosimilar Peg-filgrastim (bioPEG) in autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) are still scarce. The aim of this study has been to assess efficacy and safety of bioPEG among lymphoma and myeloma patients undergoing ASCT, comparing these data with historical controls receiving other G-CSFs. Furthermore, an economic evaluation has been included to estimate the savings by using bioPEG. This is a prospective cohort study comparing lymphoma and myeloma patients undergoing ASCT and receiving bioPEG (n = 73) with three historical consecutive cohorts collected retrospectively who received other G-CSFs (Lenograstim - Leno - n = 101, biosimilar Filgrastim - bioFIL n = 392, and originator Peg-filgrastim - oriPEG n = 60). We observed a significantly shorter time to neutrophils and platelet engraftment (p < 0.001) in patients treated with bioPEG and oriPEG. Moreover, patients who received bioPEG showed a shorter hospitalization time (p < 0.001) and a lower transfusion need (p < 0.001). We did not observe any significant difference in terms of transplant-related mortality, mucositis, and diarrhea among the four groups. No serious adverse events were associated with bioPEG. Similar data were obtained after running a stratified analysis for lymphomas and myeloma separately conducted by using a propensity score matching. The average total cost per patient of bioPEG was € 18218.9 compared to € 23707.8, € 20677.3 and € 19754.9 of Leno, oriPEG, and bioFIL, respectively. In conclusion, bioPEG seems to be as effective as the originator and more effective than short-acting G-CSFs in terms of post-transplant engraftment in myeloma and lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT. Moreover, bioPEG was cost-effective when compared with the other G-CSFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Marchesi
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Irene Terrenato
- Department of Research, Advanced Diagnostics and Technological Innovation, Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Papa
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Tomassi
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Falcucci
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Svitlana Gumenyuk
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Palombi
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pisani
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Renzi
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Atelda Romano
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Spadea
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Regazzo
- Department of Research, Advanced Diagnostics and Technological Innovation, Genomic and Epigenetic Unit, Translational Research Area, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Rizzo
- Department of Research, Advanced Diagnostics and Technological Innovation, Genomic and Epigenetic Unit, Translational Research Area, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Mafalda De Rienzo
- Immuno-Transfusional Medicine Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Simona Sgromo
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Viggiani
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Ponte
- Leukapheresis and Cellular Therapy Unit, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ramy Kayal
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Iole Cordone
- Clinical Pathology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Laura Foddai
- Immuno-Transfusional Medicine Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Mengarelli
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 55, 00144, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|