Phase I/II study of amrubicin in combination with S-1 as second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR mutation

Phase II study of amrubicin plus erlotinib in previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (TORG1320)

Background Amrubicin (AMR) is a completely synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline and clinically active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study of AMR and erlotinib (ERL) combination therapy in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC and have already reported the safety and effectiveness. Methods We conducted a multi-center, single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of AMR and ERL combination therapy in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC harboring wild-type EGFR, PS 0-1 and < 75 years of age. Patients were treated at 3-week intervals with AMR plus ERL. The primary endpoint was the PFS, and the secondary endpoints were the response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. The trough ERL concentration (C_trough) was measured as an exploratory study to analyze the relationship between the efficacy/safety and pharmacokinetics. Results From June 2013 to July 2016, 25 patients were enrolled in this trial. The PFS according to the central test was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval 2.1-5.1). The RR and DCR were 24.0% and 64.0%, respectively. We had no treatment-related deaths in this study. Conclusions The PFS of AMR and ERL combination therapy was superior to that of AMR monotherapy in the historical setting, but the primary endpoint was not met in this trial. In our study, the pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the C_trough of ERL was elevated with combination therapy. This combination therapy might be a viable treatment for previously treated NSCLC patients without a driver oncogene mutation. Clinical trial information UMIN 000010582.

A retrospective study of concurrent radiotherapy plus S-1 for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We investigated the efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy plus S-1 (CRS) for treating unresectable stage III advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ANSCLC).Seventy five ANSCLC patients were included in this retrospective study. Of those, 40 patients were assigned to an intervention group, and received S-1 (orally at 40 mg/m) twice daily for 14 consecutive days. Then, concurrent radiotherapy was administered in 2 Gy fractions, 5 times weekly for a total dose of 60 Gy. The other 35 patients were assigned to a control group, and underwent concurrent radiotherapy (the same as the intervention group) and cisplatin (60 mg/m on day 1 (CRC). The outcome measurements included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity.The 3-year ORR was 60.7% and 43.9% for intervention group and control group, respectively (P = .031). The median OS was 34.1 months and 25.3 months in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P = .041). The median PFS was 31.5 months for intervention group, while it was 22.4 months for control group (P = .048). No significant difference in toxicity was found between the 2 groups.The results demonstrated that the efficacy of CRS was superior to the CRC in ANSCLC patients with similar toxicity.

S-1-based regimens for locally advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Aim: We performed a meta-analysis of S-1-containing regimens versus control in the management of locally advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Methodology: Eligible studies included randomized studies evaluating S-1-containing regimens in the settings of locally advanced, first-line metastatic or second-line metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Results: Pooled odds ratio for overall response rate was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.85–1.38; p = 0.2), the pooled hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.88–1.09; p = 0.69) and the pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.88–1.10; p = 0.75) for S-1-based regimens versus control. Moreover, the relative risk of febrile neutropenia was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.20–0.59; p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis has demonstrated that S-1-based regimens are associated with similar efficacy outcomes and better hematological tolerability.

Phase I dose escalation study of amrubicin plus paclitaxel in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose (RD) and the safety profile of amrubicin (AMR) plus paclitaxel (PTX) combination regimen for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PTX was administered at a fixed dose of 150 mg/m(2)/day on day 1 and AMR was intravenously administered at a starting dose of 25 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-3, and this was repeated every 4 weeks. Doses of each drug were planned as follows-level 0, 20/150; level 1, 25/150; level 2, 30/150; level 3, 30/180 AMR mg/m(2) per day/PTX mg/m(2) per day.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled in this study. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the regimen was assessed during the first cycle. At level 1, all three patients developed a DLT due to grade 4 neutropenia lasting >4 days, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Therefore, level 1 was considered the MTD and level 0 was selected as the RD. Objective responses were seen in two patients (response rate 16.7 %). Overall disease control rate was 91.7 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of AMR and PTX is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. Although our study included a small number of patients, encouraging disease control and progression-free survival were achieved at the recommended doses. Further clinical trials are warranted.