Everolimus pharmacokinetics and its exposure-toxicity relationship in patients with thyroid cancer

A Narrative Review of Chromatographic Bioanalytical Methods for Quantifying Everolimus in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Applications

BACKGROUND

Methods for measuring drug levels in the body are crucial for improving therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and personalized medicine. In solid-organ transplants, TDM is essential for the management of immunosuppressive drugs to avoid toxicity and organ rejection. Everolimus is a commonly used immunosuppressant with a small range of safe doses; therefore, it is important to adjust the dose according to each patient's needs. Therefore, reliable methods are required to accurately measure everolimus levels. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive and updated narrative review of chromatographic bioanalytical methods for everolimus quantification.

METHODS

The authors searched for original research articles published between 2013 and 2023 in Scopus and PubMed and found 295 articles after removing duplicates. Based on their titles and summaries, 30 articles were selected for a detailed review and 25 articles were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 25 studies, 16 used protein precipitation, mainly with methanol, to prepare the samples, 12 used high-performance liquid chromatography, 11 used ultra-performance liquid chromatography, and 2 used both. Almost all the studies (24 of 25) used tandem mass spectrometry for detection, whereas only 1 used ultraviolet.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive review of bioanalytical methods for measuring everolimus using chromatography is a useful resource for researchers developing bioanalytical methods for TDM applications. Future trends in everolimus measurement include achieving lower detection limits, owing to the trend of reducing drug doses in therapy by improving sample extraction techniques and using more sensitive methods.

Everolimus Personalized Therapy: Second Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology

ABSTRACT

The Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology established the second consensus report to guide Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of everolimus (EVR) and its optimal use in clinical practice 7 years after the first version was published in 2016. This version provides information focused on new developments that have arisen in the last 7 years. For the general aspects of the pharmacology and TDM of EVR that have retained their relevance, readers can refer to the 2016 document. This edition includes new evidence from the literature, focusing on the topics updated during the last 7 years, including indirect pharmacological effects of EVR on the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 with the major mechanism of direct inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1. In addition, various concepts and technical options to monitor EVR concentrations, improve analytical performance, and increase the number of options available for immunochemical analytical methods have been included. Only limited new pharmacogenetic information regarding EVR has emerged; however, pharmacometrics and model-informed precision dosing have been constructed using physiological parameters as covariates, including pharmacogenetic information. In clinical settings, EVR is combined with a decreased dose of calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine, instead of mycophenolic acid. The literature and recommendations for specific organ transplantations, such as that of the kidneys, liver, heart, and lungs, as well as for oncology and pediatrics have been updated. EVR TDM for pancreatic and islet transplantation has been added to this edition. The pharmacodynamic monitoring of EVR in organ transplantation has also been updated. These updates and additions, along with the previous version of this consensus document, will be helpful to clinicians and researchers treating patients receiving EVR.

Population pharmacokinetics of everolimus in renal transplant recipients receiving long-term multiple immunosuppressive therapy

Everolimus is used for immunosuppression after renal transplantation. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model of everolimus using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data of patients under long-term multiple immunosuppressive therapy, including tacrolimus. To develop the model, 185 renal transplant recipients with 3358 everolimus blood concentrations during a median postoperative period of 35.3 months were included. The PopPK model is described as a one-compartment model with first-order absorption. The population mean of apparent clearance is 8.92 L/h (relative standard error = 3.6%), and this negatively correlated with the dose-normalized concentration (C/D) of tacrolimus and hematocrit value, and positively correlated with a daily dose of everolimus (i.e. TDM effect). The usefulness of dose adjustment using the final popPK model was assessed by a simulation study. The ratio of the first trough measurement within the therapeutic range of 3-8 ng/mL increased from 69.8% in the original dose to 87.9% in the individual dose calculated by the final PopPK model. The tacrolimus C/D ratio before initiating everolimus therapy and the hematocrit value were useful to estimate the initial dose of everolimus and can improve the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy involving everolimus.

Deep response to a combination of mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus and dual immunotherapy of nivolumab/ipilimumab in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma with PTEN mutation: a case report and literature review

Treating advanced thyroid cancer presents challenges due to its resistance to various treatment modalities, thereby limiting therapeutic options. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report the efficacy of temsirolimus in conjunction with dual immunotherapy of nivolumab/ipilimumab to treat heavily treated advanced PDTC. A 50-year-old female initially presented with a rapidly enlarging mass on her right neck. Subsequent diagnosis revealed poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma, leading to a total thyroidectomy followed by post-operative radioablation therapy. After four years, an examination for persistent cough revealed a recurrence of the disease within multiple mediastinal nodes. Genetic analysis of blood samples uncovered somatic mutations in the tumor, specifically involving PTEN and TP53. The disease progressed despite palliative radiation, lenvatinib, and nivolumab/ipilimumab therapy. Consequently, temsirolimus, functioning as an mTOR inhibitor, was introduced as an adjunct to the nivolumab/ipilimumab regimen. This combination approach yielded remarkable clinical improvement and disease control for a duration of approximately six months. Temsirolimus likely suppressed the aberrantly activated PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, facilitated by the PTEN genetic alteration, thus engendering an effective treatment response. This synergy between targeted agents and immunotherapy presents a promising therapeutic strategy for advanced PDTC patients with limited treatment alternatives. In previous clinical trials, mTOR inhibitors have demonstrated the ability to maintain stable disease (SD) in 65% to 74% for advanced thyroid cancer patients, including those with PDTC. When combined with other targeted therapies, the observed SD or partial response rates range from 80% to 97%. Many of these trials primarily involved differentiated thyroid carcinoma, with diverse genetic mutations. Thyroid cancer patients with alterations in the PI3K/mTOR/Akt appeared to benefit most from mTOR inhibitors. However, no clear association between the efficacy of mTOR inhibitors and specific histologies or genetic mutations has been established. Future studies are warranted to elucidate these associations.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Kinase Inhibitors in Oncology

Although kinase inhibitors (KI) frequently portray large interpatient variability, a 'one size fits all' regimen is still often used. In the meantime, relationships between exposure-response and exposure-toxicity have been established for several KIs, so this regimen could lead to unnecessary toxicity and suboptimal efficacy. Dose adjustments based on measured systemic pharmacokinetic levels-i.e., therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-could therefore improve treatment efficacy and reduce the incidence of toxicities. Therefore, the aim of this comprehensive review is to give an overview of the available evidence for TDM for the 77 FDA/EMA kinase inhibitors currently approved (as of July 1st, 2023) used in hematology and oncology. We elaborate on exposure-response and exposure-toxicity relationships for these kinase inhibitors and provide practical recommendations for TDM and discuss corresponding pharmacokinetic targets when possible.

A PK-PD model linking biomarker dynamics to progression-free survival in patients treated with everolimus and sorafenib combination therapy, EVESOR phase I trial

PURPOSE

The objective was to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model linking everolimus and sorafenib exposure with biomarker dynamics and progression-free survival (PFS) based on data from EVESOR trial in patients with solid tumors treated with everolimus and sorafenib combination therapy and to simulate alternative dosing schedules for sorafenib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Everolimus (5-10 mg once daily, qd) and sorafenib (200-400 mg twice daily, bid) were administered according to four different dosing schedules in 43 solid tumor patients. Rich PK and PD sampling for serum angiogenesis biomarkers was performed. Baseline activation of RAS/RAF/ERK (MAPK) pathway was assessed by quantification of mRNA specific gene panel in tumor biopsies. The PK-PD modeling was performed using NONMEM^® software.

RESULTS

An indirect response PK-PD model linking sorafenib plasma exposure with soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (sVEGFR2) dynamics was developed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was described by a parametric time-to-event model. Higher decreases in sVEGFR2 at day 21 and higher baseline activation of MAPK pathway were associated with longer PFS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.007, respectively). The simulated schedule sorafenib 200 mg bid 5 days-on/2 days-off + continuous everolimus 5 mg qd was associated with median PFS of 4.3 months (95% CI 1.6-14.4), whereas the median PFS in the EVESOR trial was 3.6 months (95% CI 2.7-4.2, n = 43).

CONCLUSION

Sorafenib 200 mg bid 5 days-on/2 days-off + everolimus 5 mg qd continuous was selected for an additional arm of EVESOR trial to evaluate whether this simulated schedule is associated with higher clinical benefit.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01932177.

Targeting the mTOR Pathway for the Prevention of ER-Negative Breast Cancer

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

Our results show that everolimus delays mammary tumor formation in multiple mouse models, suggesting that mTOR inhibitors will be useful for the prevention of ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancer in humans. See related Spotlight, p. 787.

Management of Renal Angiomyolipomas in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: A Case Report and Literature Review

We report a case of misdiagnosed tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) in a patient without TSC gene variant presenting with bilateral renal angiomyolipomas and seizures in the context of strong family history of polycystic kidney disease. Clinical diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis complex was made and treatment with everolimus reduced size of renal angiomyolipomas. In this case, report we discuss the association between tuberous sclerosis complex and polycystic kidney disease and novel treatment for TSC.

Everolimus pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship in Japanese patients with advanced breast cancer

Background: Everolimus is one of the key drugs for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. The optimal target concentration range for everolimus therapy in patients with breast cancer has not yet been established. This study aimed to characterize everolimus pharmacokinetics (PK) and determine the relationship between blood concentration and efficacy as well as adverse events in patients with breast cancer.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational PK study. Patients receiving everolimus between November 2015 and November 2018 at our hospital were enrolled in this study. The whole blood samples for the everolimus assay were collected at least two weeks after initiation of treatment or the last everolimus dose change. PK parameters were estimated using Bayesian analysis. Statistical differences in everolimus trough concentrations between patient cohorts were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. Progression-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled in the study. The median follow-up period was 35 months. The most frequently observed adverse event was stomatitis (all grade 94%). There was high inter-individual variation in PK parameters such as clearance [range: 5.1–21.3 L/h/70 kg and co-efficient of variation (CV): 38.5%] and volume of distribution of the central compartment (range: 9.9–103.6 L/70 kg and CV: 57.8%). The trough concentrations at dose-limiting toxicities were significantly higher than trough concentrations in the absence of these toxicities (p = 0.0058). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the 10–20 ng/ml group than in the other groups (p = 0.0078).

Conclusion: This study characterized the everolimus PK parameters in Japanese patients with breast cancer. High everolimus exposure was found to be associated with poor tolerability. Based on our data, trough concentrations in the range of 10–20 ng/ml may be associated with prolonged progression-free survival. Thus, determining the blood concentration of everolimus and subsequent dose adjustments will potentially reduce side effects and enhance the therapeutic effect in Japanese patients with advanced breast cancer.

Everolimus Concentration in Saliva to Predict Stomatitis: A Feasibility Study in Patients with Cancer

BACKGROUND

Most patients with cancer treated with everolimus experience stomatitis, which seriously affects the quality of life. The salivary concentrations of everolimus may predict the incidence and severity of stomatitis. The authors aimed to examine whether it was feasible to quantify the everolimus concentration in saliva and subsequently use it to predict stomatitis.

METHODS

Saliva and whole blood samples were taken from patients with cancer, who were treated with everolimus in the dosage of either 10 mg once a day or 5 mg twice a day. Everolimus concentrations in saliva samples were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A published population pharmacokinetic model was extended with the everolimus concentration in saliva to assess any association between everolimus in the blood and saliva. Subsequently, the association between the occurrence of stomatitis and the everolimus concentration in saliva was studied.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were included in this study; saliva samples were available from 10 patients, including 3 patients with low-grade stomatitis. Everolimus concentrations were more than 100-fold lower in saliva than in whole blood (accumulation ratio 0.00801 and relative standard error 32.5%). Interindividual variability (67.7%) and residual unexplained variability (84.0%) were high. The salivary concentration of everolimus tended to be higher in patients with stomatitis, 1 hour postdose ( P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of the everolimus concentration in saliva was feasible and revealed a nonsignificant correlation between everolimus concentration in the saliva and the occurrence of stomatitis. If future research proves this relationship to be significant, the everolimus concentration in the saliva may be used as an early predictor of stomatitis without invasive sampling. Thereby, in patients with high salivary everolimus concentrations, precautions can be taken to decrease the incidence and severity of stomatitis.

Real-world pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in metastatic breast cancer

Purpose This study investigated the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in real-world practice.Methods Twenty-two patients with mBC treated with everolimus plus exemestane were enrolled. Blood everolimus concentrations were measured at outpatient visits. The inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was examined. The efficacy and safety endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and the cumulative incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), respectively. Results Blood samples were obtained from 19 consenting patients. Everolimus did not completely inhibit mTOR activity in PBMCs at therapeutic concentrations (~ 56 % maximal inhibition). The most common adverse event was stomatitis (any grade 77 %). The trough concentration (Ctrough) was significantly higher in patients experiencing DLTs than in those without any DLTs (P = 0.030). The optimal Ctrough cutoff predicting DLT development was 17.3 ng/mL. The cumulative incidence of DLTs was significantly higher in patients with Ctrough ≥17.3 ng/mL than in other patients (sub-hazard ratio 4.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.53-15.5; P = 0.007). Furthermore, the median PFS was numerically longer in patients who maintained a steady-state Ctrough below the threshold than in those who did not (327 days [95 % CI 103-355 days] vs. 194 days [95 % CI 45 days-not estimable]; P = 0.35). Conclusions The suggested upper threshold for the therapeutic window of everolimus Ctrough was 17.3 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing may improve the efficacy and safety of everolimus for mBC, warranting further investigation in a larger study.Clinical trial registry: Not applicable.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs

PURPOSE

This review provides an overview of the current challenges in oral targeted antineoplastic drug (OAD) dosing and outlines the unexploited value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Factors influencing the pharmacokinetic exposure in OAD therapy are depicted together with an overview of different TDM approaches. Finally, current evidence for TDM for all approved OADs is reviewed.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search (covering literature published until April 2020), including primary and secondary scientific literature on pharmacokinetics and dose individualisation strategies for OADs, together with US FDA Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Reviews and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use European Public Assessment Reports was conducted.

RESULTS

OADs are highly potent drugs, which have substantially changed treatment options for cancer patients. Nevertheless, high pharmacokinetic variability and low treatment adherence are risk factors for treatment failure. TDM is a powerful tool to individualise drug dosing, ensure drug concentrations within the therapeutic window and increase treatment success rates. After reviewing the literature for 71 approved OADs, we show that exposure-response and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been established for the majority. Moreover, TDM has been proven to be feasible for individualised dosing of abiraterone, everolimus, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and tamoxifen in prospective studies. There is a lack of experience in how to best implement TDM as part of clinical routine in OAD cancer therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sub-therapeutic concentrations and severe adverse events are current challenges in OAD treatment, which can both be addressed by the application of TDM-guided dosing, ensuring concentrations within the therapeutic window.

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Everolimus: External Validation in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The immunosuppressant everolimus is increasingly applied in renal transplantation. Its extensive pharmacokinetic variability necessitates therapeutic drug monitoring, typically based on whole-blood trough concentrations (C₀). Unfortunately, therapeutic drug monitoring target attainment rates are often unsatisfactory and patients with on-target exposure may still develop organ rejection. As everolimus displays erythrocyte partitioning, haematocrit-normalised whole-blood exposure has been suggested as a more informative therapeutic drug monitoring marker. Furthermore, model-informed precision dosing has introduced options for more sophisticated dose adaptation. We have previously developed a mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model, which described everolimus plasma pharmacokinetics and enabled estimation of haematocrit-normalised whole-blood exposure. Here, we externally evaluated this model for its utility for model-informed precision dosing.

METHODS

The retrospective dataset included 4123 pharmacokinetic observations from routine clinical therapeutic drug monitoring in 173 renal transplant recipients. Model appropriateness was confirmed with a visual predictive check. A fit-for-purpose analysis was conducted to evaluate whether the model accurately and precisely predicted a future C₀ or area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from prior pharmacokinetic observations. Bias and imprecision were expressed as the mean percentage prediction error (MPPE) and mean absolute percentage prediction error (MAPE), stratified on 6 months post-transplant. Additionally, we compared dose adaptation recommendations of conventional C₀-based therapeutic drug monitoring and C₀- or AUC-based model-informed precision dosing, and assessed the percentage of differences between observed and haematocrit-normalised C₀ (∆C₀) and AUC (∆AUC) exceeding ± 20%.

RESULTS

The model showed adequate accuracy and precision for C₀ and AUC prediction at ≤ 6 months (MPPE_C0: 8.1 ± 2.5%, MAPE_C0: 26.8 ± 2.1%; MPPE_AUC: - 9.7 ± 5.1%, MAPE_AUC: 13.3 ± 3.9%) and > 6 months post-transplant (MPPE_C0: 4.7 ± 2.0%, MAPE_C0: 25.4 ± 1.4%; MPPE_AUC: - 0.13 ± 4.8%, MAPE_AUC: 13.3 ± 2.8%). On average, dose adaptation recommendations derived from C₀-based and AUC-based model-informed precision dosing were 2.91 ± 0.01% and 13.7 ± 0.18% lower than for conventional C₀-based therapeutic drug monitoring at ≤ 6 months, and 0.93 ± 0.01% and 3.14 ± 0.04% lower at > 6 months post-transplant. The ∆C₀ and ∆AUC exceeded ± 20% on 13.6% and 14.3% of occasions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that our population pharmacokinetic model was able to accurately and precisely predict future everolimus exposure from prior pharmacokinetic measurements. In addition, we illustrated the potential added value of performing everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring with haematocrit-normalised whole-blood concentrations. Our results provide reassurance to implement this methodology in clinical practice for further evaluation.

Advantages of everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology when drug-drug interaction is suspected: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Drug interactions involving everolimus are fairly well known because of its common use, primarily as an immunosuppressant. Several recommendations regarding therapeutic drug monitoring are also available for the use of everolimus-based immunosuppression regimens. However, everolimus use in oncology differs substantially, particularly because of the high doses involved. Therapeutic drug monitoring, although sometimes necessary, is not recommended as a routine in oncology. Thus, it was deemed inapplicable due to the lack of clear recommendations.

CASE REPORT

Here, we present a case where a patient was prescribed everolimus for renal cell carcinoma. The patient benefitted from a pharmaceutical consultation prior to treatment initiation, and a drug interaction with verapamil was suspected.Management and outcome: Therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus was proposed. Based on the everolimus values reported in the literature, trough plasma concentration in the patient was greatly increased. The patient was then diagnosed with grade 4 oral mucositis, thereby requiring temporary suspension of everolimus treatment. Management of adverse effects was performed through multiple medicated mouthwashes.

DISCUSSION

Therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus is important for potential drug interactions or the occurrence of severe adverse events. In such cases, dose adjustments should be managed according to everolimus plasma concentrations. Clear oncological recommendations regarding plasma everolimus thresholds are required for a successful follow-up of the patient's condition and to ensure adequate response to treatment.

Pharmacokinetic Optimization of Everolimus Dosing in Oncology: A Randomized Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus is used in the treatment of breast cancer, neuroendocrine tumors, and renal cancer. The approved 10 mg once-daily dose is associated with considerable adverse effects and it has been suggested that these are associated with the maximum concentration (C _max) of everolimus. Twice-daily dosing might be an alternative strategy with improved tolerability; however, a direct pharmacokinetic comparison of 10 mg once-daily with 5 mg twice-daily dosing is lacking.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, randomized, pharmacokinetic, crossover trial comparing everolimus 10 mg once daily with 5 mg twice daily. Patients received the first dose schedule for 2 weeks and then switched to the alternative regimen for 2 weeks. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 14 and 28.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were included in the study, of whom 10 were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis. On the 10 mg once-daily schedule, C _max, minimum concentration (C _min), and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC₂₄) were 61.5 ng/mL [mean percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) 29.6], 9.6 ng/mL (CV% 35.0), and 435 ng h/mL (CV% 28.1), respectively. Switching to the 5 mg twice-daily schedule resulted in a reduction of C _max to 40.3 ng/mL (CV% 46.6) (p = 0.013), while maintaining AUC₂₄ at 436 ng h/mL (CV% 34.8) (p = 0.952). C _min increased to 13.7 ng/mL (CV% 53.9) (p = 0.018). The overall reduction in C _max was 21.2 ng/mL, or 32.7%. The C _max/C _min ratio was reduced from 6.44 (CV% 36.2) to 3.18 (CV% 35.5) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that switching from a once-daily to a twice-daily everolimus dose schedule reduces C _max without negatively impacting C _min or AUC₂₄. These results merit further investigation of the twice-daily schedule in an effort to reduce everolimus toxicity while maintaining treatment efficacy.

REGISTRATION

This trial was registered in the EurdaCT database (2014-004833-25) and the Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR4908).

A novel rapamycin analog is highly selective for mTORC1 in vivo

Rapamycin, an inhibitor of mechanistic Target Of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1), extends lifespan and shows strong potential for the treatment of age-related diseases. However, rapamycin exerts metabolic and immunological side effects mediated by off-target inhibition of a second mTOR-containing complex, mTOR complex 2. Here, we report the identification of DL001, a FKBP12-dependent rapamycin analog 40x more selective for mTORC1 than rapamycin. DL001 inhibits mTORC1 in cell culture lines and in vivo in C57BL/6J mice, in which DL001 inhibits mTORC1 signaling without impairing glucose homeostasis and with substantially reduced or no side effects on lipid metabolism and the immune system. In cells, DL001 efficiently represses elevated mTORC1 activity and restores normal gene expression to cells lacking a functional tuberous sclerosis complex. Our results demonstrate that highly selective pharmacological inhibition of mTORC1 can be achieved in vivo, and that selective inhibition of mTORC1 significantly reduces the side effects associated with conventional rapalogs.

Accuracy evaluation of automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for everolimus and sirolimus compared to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Background

We evaluated the analytical performance of a newly developed electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for everolimus and sirolimus compared to that of liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS).

Methods

According to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines, the analytical performance including precision, recovery, linearity, and carryover was evaluated. For correlation evaluation, the results of Elecsys^® analysis of everolimus and sirolimus were compared with those of LC‐MS/MS using 120 samples from patients treated with everolimus or sirolimus.

Results

The within‐run and total imprecision values were as follows: 2.3%‐4.5% and 4.5%‐6.4% for the everolimus assay; 3.3%‐4.8% and 4.7%‐8.1% for the sirolimus assay, respectively. The measured concentration was linear over the range of 0.718‐27.585 ng/mL for everolimus analysis and 0.789‐26.880 ng/mL for sirolimus analysis (all R² > 0.99). Recovery was 93.5%‐105.5% for the everolimus assay and 99.2%‐109.1% for the sirolimus assay (except lowest levels). Carryover was −1.09% for the everolimus assay and −0.12% for the sirolimus assay. The results of the two chemiluminescence immunoassays showed acceptable correlations with those of LC‐MS/MS (R = 0.9585 and R = 0.9799, respectively). The two immunoassays showed slightly proportional biases compared to LC‐MS/MS.

Conclusion

Elecsys^® Everolimus and Sirolimus assays showed acceptable analytical performance in precision, linearity, and correlation compared to LC‐MS/MS These methods can be adopted in the clinical laboratory for rapid therapeutic drug monitoring of patients who require treatment with immunosuppressants.

mTORC1 as a Regulator of Mitochondrial Functions and a Therapeutic Target in Cancer

Continuous proliferation of tumor cells requires constant adaptations of energy metabolism to rapidly fuel cell growth and division. This energetic adaptation often comprises deregulated glucose uptake and lactate production in the presence of oxygen, a process known as the "Warburg effect." For many years it was thought that the Warburg effect was a result of mitochondrial damage, however, unlike this proposal tumor cell mitochondria maintain their functionality, and is essential for integrating a variety of signals and adapting the metabolic activity of the tumor cell. The mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a master regulator of numerous cellular processes implicated in proliferation, metabolism, and cell growth. mTORC1 controls cellular metabolism mainly by regulating the translation and transcription of metabolic genes, such as peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ coactivator-1 α (PGC-1α), sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1/2 (SREBP1/2), and hypoxia inducible factor-1 α (HIF-1α). Interestingly it has been shown that mTORC1 regulates mitochondrial metabolism, thus representing an important regulator in mitochondrial function. Here we present an overview on the role of mTORC1 in the regulation of mitochondrial functions in cancer, considering new evidences showing that mTORC1 regulates the translation of nucleus-encoded mitochondrial mRNAs that result in an increased ATP mitochondrial production. Moreover, we discuss the relationship between mTORC1 and glutaminolysis, as well as mitochondrial metabolites. In addition, mitochondrial fission processes regulated by mTORC1 and its impact on cancer are discussed. Finally, we also review the therapeutic efficacy of mTORC1 inhibitors in cancer treatments, considering its use in combination with other drugs, with particular focus on cellular metabolism inhibitors, that could help improve their anti neoplastic effect and eliminate cancer cells in patients.

The Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus Talimogene Laherparepvec Shows Promising Efficacy in Neuroendocrine Cancer Cell Lines

Metastatic neuroendocrine cancer still constitutes a palliative situation, lacking promising treatment options. Oncolytic virotherapy, a novel type of virus-based immunotherapy, lyses tumor cells using genetically engineered viruses thereby activating the immune system to induce an optimized antitumor response which could bring down tumor masses to a stage of minimal residual tumor disease. The oncolytic vector talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC, herpes simplex virus [HSV] type 1) has already shown excellent safety profiles in clinical studies and has become the first ever FDA/EMA-approved oncolytic virus (OV). This work presents a first preclinical assessment of this state-of-the-art OV, using a panel of human neuroendocrine tumor/neuroendocrine carcinoma (NET/NEC) cell lines. Cytotoxicity, transgene expression, and viral replication patterns were studied. Furthermore, the antiproliferative activity was compared to the one of mTOR inhibitor Everolimus and also interactions between the OV and Everolimus were evaluated. Moreover, virostatic effects of ganciclovir (GCV) on replication of T-VEC were assessed and electron microscopic pictures were taken to comprehend viral envelopment and details of the replication cycle of T-VEC in human neuroendocrine cancer. It could be shown that T-VEC infects, replicates in, and lyses human NET/NEC cells exhibiting high oncolytic efficiencies already at quite low virus concentrations. Interestingly, Everolimus was not found to have any relevant impact on rates of viral replication, but no additive effects could be proved using a combinatorial therapy regimen. On the other hand, GCV was shown to be able to limit replication of T-VEC, thus establishing an important safety feature for future treatments of NET/NEC patients. Taken together, T-VEC opens up a promising novel treatment option for NET/NEC patients, warranting its further preclinical and clinical development.

Validation and clinical application of an LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of everolimus using volumetric absorptive microsampling

Everolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor approved for the treatment of various tumor types. Less invasive measurement of everolimus concentrations could facilitate pharmacokinetic studies and personalized dosing based on whole blood concentrations, known as therapeutic drug monitoring. Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS) has been introduced as a patient friendly, less invasive sampling technique to obtain an accurate volume of whole blood regardless of hematocrit value. We describe the bioanalytical validation and clinical application of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to quantify everolimus using VAMS. For the quantification, ¹³C₂D₄-Everolimus was used as internal standard (IS). Everolimus and the IS were extracted with methanol from the VAMS device, which was evaporated after ultrasonification and shaking. The residue was reconstituted in 20 mM ammonium formate buffer and methanol (50%, v/v) of which 5 μL was injected into the LC-MS/MS system. Quantification was performed for the ammonium adduct of everolimus in positive electrospray ion mode. The VAMS method met all pre-defined validation criteria. Accuracy and precision were within 11.1% and ≤14.6%, respectively. Samples were shown to be stable on the VAMS device for at least 362 days at ambient temperatures. Considerable biases from -20 to 31% were observed over a 30-50% hematocrit range. Although the method fulfilled all validation criteria, the perceived advantage of VAMS over dried blood spot sampling could not be demonstrated. Despite the effect of hematocrit, using an empirically derived formula the whole blood everolimus concentration could be back calculated with reasonable accuracy in the clinical application study.

Oral stomatitis and mTOR inhibitors: A review of current evidence in 20,915 patients

BACKGROUND

Traditional treatment of malignancies with chemotherapeutic agents is often affected by the damage inflicted on non-cancerous cells. Toxicities of the oral cavity, such as mucositis and stomatitis, are some of the most significant and unavoidable toxicities associated with anti-cancer therapies. For such reason, in the last decades, newer targeted agents have been developed aiming to decrease the rates of side effects on healthy cells. Unfortunately, targeted anti-cancer therapies also showed significant rate of toxicity on healthy tissues. mTOR inhibitors showed some adverse events, such as hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hypophosphatemia, hematologic toxicities, and mucocutaneous eruption, but the most important are still stomatitis and skin rash, often reported as dose-limiting side effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A search of the literature was performed by authors on the PubMed online database using the following key words: "sirolimus" OR "everolimus" OR "temsirolimus" OR "deforolimus" OR "ridaforolimus" combined with the Boolean operator AND with the terms: "stomatitis" OR "mucositis" OR "oral pain." Titles and abstracts of 382 potentially relevant studies were screened; of these, 114 studies were excluded because they did not report the inclusion criteria. In the second round, 268 studies were read full-text, but only 135 reported the inclusion criteria and were included for data extraction. Of the included studies, 95 referred to everolimus use, 16 to ridaforolimus, and 26 to temsirolimus (two studies referred to both everolimus and temsirolimus).

RESULTS

The incidence rate of stomatitis according to the agent used was 25.07% (3,959/15,787) for everolimus, 27.02% (724/2,679) for temsirolimus, and 54.76% (598/1,092) for ridaforolimus. All the three agents analyzed showed high rates of low-grade stomatitis (G1-G2), while the onset of severe stomatitis (G3-G4) was rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of the reports with patients treated with everolimus, temsirolimus, and ridaforolimus showed a clear prevalence of stomatitis grade 1 or 2. These data differ from that of patients treated with conventional chemotherapy in which mucositis is predominantly of grade 3 or 4.

A pharmacological rationale for improved everolimus dosing in oncology and transplant patients

AIMS

Everolimus is a drug from the class of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors used for both immunosuppressant and oncological indications. We postulate that there is room for improvement of dosing, as the optimal immunosuppressive dose in calcineurin-free regimens is unknown and since the once daily dosing regimen for oncological indications is often associated with treatment-limiting toxicity.

METHODS

We developed a mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model for everolimus in cancer and transplant patients and explored alternative dosing regimens.

RESULTS

We found that formulation did not influence bioavailability and that use of >20 mg prednisolone daily increased everolimus clearance. In transplant patients, the approved dose of 0.75-1 mg twice daily (BID) results in subtherapeutic trough levels (<6 μg l-1 ) and that a higher starting dose of 2.25-3 mg BID is required.

CONCLUSION

For oncological indications, our results encourage the investigation of dosing everolimus 3.75 mg BID in terms of superiority in safety and noninferiority in efficacy.

Multiscale systems pharmacological analysis of everolimus action in hepatocellular carcinoma

Dysregulation of mTOR pathway is common in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A translational quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP), pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) model dissecting the circuitry of this pathway was developed to predict HCC patients' response to everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor. The time course of key signaling proteins in the mTOR pathway, HCC cells viability, tumor volume (TV) and everolimus plasma and tumor concentrations in xenograft mice, clinical PK of everolimus and progression free survival (PFS) in placebo and everolimus-treated patients were extracted from literature. A comprehensive and multiscale QSP/PK/PD model was developed, qualified, and translated to clinical settings. Model fittings and simulations were performed using Monolix software. The S6-kinase protein was identified as critical in the mTOR signaling pathway for describing everolimus lack of efficacy in HCC patients. The net growth rate constant (kg) of HCC cells was estimated at 0.02 h^-1 (2.88%RSE). The partition coefficient of everolimus into the tumor (kp) was determined at 0.06 (12.98%RSE). The kg in patients was calculated from the doubling time of TV in naturally progressing HCC patients, and was determined at 0.004 day^-1. Model-predicted and observed PFS were in good agreement for placebo and everolimus-treated patients. In conclusion, a multiscale QSP/PK/PD model elucidating everolimus lack of efficacy in HCC patients was successfully developed and predicted PFS reasonably well compared to observed clinical findings. This model may provide insights into clinical response to everolimus-based therapy and serve as a valuable tool for the clinical translation of efficacy for novel mTOR inhibitors.

Clinical validation study of dried blood spot for determining everolimus concentration in patients with cancer

PURPOSE

Everolimus treatment is seriously hampered by its toxicity profile. As a relationship between everolimus exposure and effectiveness and toxicity has been established, early and ongoing concentration measurement can be key to individualize the dose and optimize treatment outcomes. Dried blood spot (DBS) facilitates sampling at a patients' home and thereby eases dose individualization. The aim of this study is to determine the agreement and predictive performance of DBS compared to whole blood (WB) to measure everolimus concentrations in cancer patients.

METHODS

Paired DBS and WB samples were collected in 22 cancer patients treated with everolimus and analyzed using UPLC-MS/MS. Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok analysis were used to determine method agreement. Limits of clinical relevance were set at a difference of ± 25%, as this would lead to a different dosing advice. Using DBS concentration and Passing-Bablok regression analysis, WB concentrations were predicted.

RESULTS

Samples of 20 patients were suitable for analysis. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean ratio of everolimus WB to DBS concentrations of 0.90, with 95% of data points within limits of clinical relevance. Passing-Bablok regression of DBS compared to WB revealed no constant bias (intercept 0.02; 95% CI 0.93-1.35) and a small proportional bias (slope 0.89; 95% CI 0.76-0.99). Predicted concentrations showed low bias and imprecision and 90% of samples had an absolute percentage prediction error of < 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

DBS is a valid method to determine everolimus concentrations in cancer patients. This can especially be of value for early recognition of over- or underexposure to enable dose adaptations.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Everolimus in Relation to Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Everolimus has been used for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Here, we measured blood concentrations of everolimus to obtain the population pharmacokinetic parameters and to examine the relationship between blood concentration and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty-two Japanese patients were enrolled. Blood samples were collected before and 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after drug administration on days 1 and 8 of everolimus therapy (5 or 10 mg) from inpatients; occasional samples were collected from outpatients. Blood concentrations of everolimus were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using the NONMEM software.

RESULTS

Everolimus pharmacokinetics was best described by a 2-compartment model with population mean estimates of apparent oral clearance of 10.0 L/h and an interindividual variability of 42.4%. There was no relationship between overall best responses and the predicted trough concentrations at day 8. The predicted trough concentration in patients who terminated everolimus treatment owing to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was significantly higher than in patients who stopped the treatment owing to disease progression or other reasons (27.6 ± 3.1 versus 15.7 ± 2.3 ng/mL; mean ± SEM). Patients who terminated the treatment owing to ADRs had significantly shorter time-to-treatment failure than other patients (112 versus 187 days, median).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports the first population pharmacokinetic parameters of everolimus in patients with RCC. Individual dose adjustment based on everolimus blood concentrations helps to avoid early drug cessation due to ADRs.

Clinical evaluation of P-glycoprotein inhibition by venetoclax: a drug interaction study with digoxin

1. Venetoclax is a novel, small molecule B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor that has demonstrated clinical efficacy in a variety of haematological malignancies. Since venetoclax is an inhibitor of P glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter, a study was conducted in healthy, female volunteers to evaluate the effect of venetoclax on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin, a P-gp probe substrate. 2. Volunteers received a single oral dose of digoxin (0.5 mg) with or without a single oral dose of venetoclax (100  mg). Serial blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic assessments of digoxin and venetoclax and serial urine samples were obtained for measurement of digoxin concentrations. Safety was assessed throughout the study. 3. Coadministration of digoxin and venetoclax increased digoxin maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) by 35% and area under the plasma-concentration time curve (AUC_0-∞) by 9%. Digoxin half-life, renal clearance and the fraction excreted unchanged in urine remained relatively similar. The results of this study indicate that venetoclax can increase the concentrations of P-gp substrates. Narrow therapeutic index P-gp substrates should be administered six hours prior to venetoclax to minimise the potential interaction.

Continuous low plasma concentrations of everolimus provides equivalent efficacy to oral daily dosing in mouse xenograft models of human cancer

PURPOSE

Everolimus is a drug used successfully in a number of different oncology indications, but significant on-target toxicities exist. We explored the possibility of improving the therapeutic index (TI) by studying alternative means of administering the drug based upon low continuous dosing.

METHODS

All studies were performed using naïve nude mice or nude mice bearing s.c. human renal 786-O tumours or human breast MDA-MB-468 tumours. Everolimus was administered via a standard emulsion, either i.v., p.o., i.p., s.c., or via s.c. osmotic mini-pumps (MP) or via poly-lactic-co-glycolic (PLGA)-microparticles (PLGA-µP) prepared from everolimus powder injected s.c. Total-drug levels in blood, plasma or tissues were quantified ex vivo by LC-MS/MS. Efficacy studies were performed over 2-3 weeks and toxicity assessed by changes in body weight, glucose and white blood cell count. Effects on tumour activity biomarkers were quantified using reverse-phase protein array.

RESULTS

Everolimus administration s.c. in an emulsion decreased the absorption rate but increased the C _max and bio-availability of everolimus compared to standard approaches of administration p.o. or i.p. Everolimus administration s.c. via MP or PLGA-µP reduced the C _max and provided continuous low concentrations of everolimus in the plasma, which inhibited tumour pS6/S6 to a similar degree to oral administration. Toxicities such as changes in body weight or white blood cell count were unaffected. Provided the everolimus concentration was above the free unbound IC50 for proliferation of the tumour cell line, efficacy could be achieved equivalent to that provided by standard oral administration. However, an overall improvement in the TI could not be demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous low plasma concentrations of everolimus can provide strong efficacy in preclinical models, which if translatable to the clinic may reduce on-target toxicities and so increase the TI.

Advances in small molecule therapy for treating metastatic thyroid cancer

INTRODUCTION

Multi kinase inhibitors (MKIs) are new drugs, which show activity against receptors of different growth factors leading to the inhibition of tumor cells growth and proliferation. This review summarizes a 10-year experience with the use of MKIs in thyroid cancer (TC). It focuses not only on sorafenib, lenvatinib, vandetanib and cabozantinib, already approved in TC, but also presents an overview of the results of different trials with distinct MKIs so far carried out in TC. Areas covered: Published results of phase I, II and III studies and other reports evaluated the efficacy of different targeted drugs in TC. Expert opinion: Despite numerous clinical trials with distinct MKIs, only four of them unequivocally demonstrated a beneficial effect on progression free survival in radioiodine refractory differentiated or medullary TC. In contrast to other solid tumors, we are still lacking in convincing evidences of their impact on overall survival. We still do not have any strong proof fulfilling evidence-based medicine criteria, when to start MKIs and which drug to use. The questions whether we really have to wait for disease progression in patients with a large tumor burden and/or aggressive types TC or when to stop MKIs treatment remain open.

On the pathogenesis of mTOR inhibitor-associated stomatitis (mIAS)-studies using an organotypic model of the oral mucosa

OBJECTIVE

mTOR inhibitor treatment of solid cancers is associated with mTOR inhibitor-associated stomatitis (mIAS) a common, significant, dose-limiting toxicity, with aphthous-like lesions. Our objective was to assess the utility of a new organotypic model in defining mIAS' pathogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The effect of everolimus on organotypic human oral mucosa was studied. Sterile specimens were assessed 24 and 48 h after exposure to varying concentrations of everolimus. Morphologic changes and measures of apoptosis, proliferation, and levels of six Th1 and Th2 cytokines were studied.

RESULTS

Following a 24-h incubation, concentrations of 500 ng ml^-1 of everolimus resulted in histological changes consistent with epithelial injury, disorganization and pre- or early apoptosis, increased TUNEL-positive staining (P < 0.05) and reduced PCNA-positive staining cells (P < 0.001) and increased levels of IL-6 (P < 0.0001), IL-8 (P < 0.01), and IFN-γ (P < 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus elicited epithelial damage manifest by morphologic changes, increased apoptosis, and decreased proliferation with concurrent release of keratinocyte-derived pro-inflammatory cytokines in the absence of bacteria. The extent of the effect was concentration and time dependent. These results suggest that mIAS is likely initiated by direct epithelial injury, independent of the microbiome. Keratinocyte cytokine release could likely play a role in accelerating an inflammatory infiltrate.