A Phase I study of safety and pharmacokinetics of fruquintinib, a novel selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, -2, and -3 tyrosine kinases in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors

Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized phase 3 FRUTIGA trial

The vascular endothelial growth factor pathway plays a key role in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. In the multicenter, double-blind phase 3 FRUTIGA trial, 703 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who progressed on fluorouracil- and platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive fruquintinib (an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1/2/3; 4 mg orally, once daily) or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off, plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1/8/15 per cycle). The study results were positive as one of the dual primary endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS), was met (median PFS, 5.6 months in the fruquintinib arm versus 2.7 months in the placebo arm; hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.68; P < 0.0001). The other dual primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not met (median OS, 9.6 months versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.13; P = 0.6064). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel as a second-line treatment significantly improved PFS, but not OS, in Chinese patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and could potentially be another treatment option for these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03223376 .

The trend toward more target therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Despite the considerable progress made in cancer treatment through the development of target therapies, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to exhibit resistance to this category of drugs. As a result, chemotherapy combination regimens remain the primary treatment approach for this aggressive cancer.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of past and ongoing trials on both well-known and novel targets that are being explored in PDAC, including PARP, EGFR, HER2, KRAS, and its downstream and upstream pathways (such as RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR), JAK/STAT pathway, angiogenesis, metabolisms, epigenetic targets, claudin, and novel targets (such as P53 and plectin). We also provide a comprehensive overview of the significant trials for each target, allowing a thorough glimpse into the past and future of target therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The path toward implementing a target therapy capable of improving the overall survival of PDAC is still long, and it is unlikely that a monotherapy target drug will fulfill a meaningful role in addressing the complexity of this cancer. Thus, we discuss the future direction of target therapies in PDAC, trying to identify the more promising target and combination treatments, with a special focus on the more eagerly awaited ongoing trials.

Safety and efficacy of fruquintinib-based therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib-based therapy as a salvage therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma, including soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma were divided into two groups. One group received fruquintinib monotherapy, while the other received fruquintinib combined therapy. Safety and efficacy of fruquintinib-based therapy were recorded and reviewed retrospectively, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Between August 2021 and December 2022, 38 sarcoma patients were retrospectively included. A total of 14 patients received fruquintinib alone (including 6 STS and 8 bone sarcoma), while 24 were treated with fruquintinib combined therapy (including 2 STS and 22 bone sarcoma). The median follow-up was 10.2 months (95% CI, 6.4-11.5). For the entire population, the median PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.5-13.0). The ORR was 13.1%, while the disease control rate (DCR) was 86.8%. The univariate analysis showed that radiotherapy history (HR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.70-12.24; p = 0.003), bone sarcoma (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14-0.87; p = 0.024), and treatment method of fruquintinib (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.85; p = 0.021) were significantly associated with PFS. The multivariate analysis showed that patients without radiotherapy history were associated with a better PFS (HR, 3.71; 95% CI: 1.31-10.55; p = 0.014) than patients with radiotherapy history. Patients in combination group reported pneumothorax (8.3%), leukopenia (33.3%), thrombocytopenia (12.5%), diarrhea (4.2%), and anemia (4.2%) as the most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), while there was no severe TEAEs occurred in the monotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Fruquintinib-based therapy displayed an optimal tumor control and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma.

Efficacy comparison of fruquintinib, regorafenib monotherapy or plus programmed death-1 inhibitors for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib (R) and fruquintinib (F) are the standard third-line regimens for colorectal cancer (CRC) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, but both have limited efficacy. Several phase 2 trials have indicated that R or F combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can reverse immunosuppression and achieve promising efficacy for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) CRC. Due to the lack of studies comparing the efficacy between F, R, F plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and R plus PD-1 inhibitors (RP), it is still unclear whether the combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy.

AIM

To provide critical evidence for selecting the appropriate drugs for MSS/pMMR metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

A total of 2639 CRC patients were enrolled from January 2018 to September 2022 in our hospital, and 313 MSS/pMMR mCRC patients were finally included.

RESULTS

A total of 313 eligible patients were divided into F (n = 70), R (n = 67), F plus PD-1 inhibitor (FP) (n = 95) and RP (n = 81) groups. The key clinical characteristics were well balanced among the groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the F, R, FP, and RP groups was 3.5 months, 3.6 months, 4.9 months, and 3.0 months, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.6 months, 15.7 months, 16.7 months, and 14.1 months. The FP regimen had an improved disease control rate (DCR) (P = 0.044) and 6-month PFS (P = 0.014) and exhibited a better trend in PFS (P = 0.057) compared with F, and it was also significantly better in PFS than RP (P = 0.030). RP did not confer a significant survival benefit; instead, the R group had a trend toward greater benefit with OS (P = 0.080) compared with RP. No significant differences were observed between the R and F groups in PFS or OS (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

FP is superior to F in achieving 6-month PFS and DCR, while RP is not better than R. FP has an improved PFS and 6-month PFS compared with RP, but F and R had similar clinical efficacy. Therefore, FP may be a highly promising strategy in the treatment of MSS/pMMR mCRC.

Efficacy comparison of fruquintinib, regorafenib monotherapy or plus programmed death-1 inhibitors for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib (R) and fruquintinib (F) are the standard third-line regimens for colorectal cancer (CRC) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, but both have limited efficacy. Several phase 2 trials have indicated that R or F combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can reverse immunosuppression and achieve promising efficacy for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) CRC. Due to the lack of studies comparing the efficacy between F, R, F plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and R plus PD-1 inhibitors (RP), it is still unclear whether the combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy.

AIM

To provide critical evidence for selecting the appropriate drugs for MSS/pMMR metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

A total of 2639 CRC patients were enrolled from January 2018 to September 2022 in our hospital, and 313 MSS/pMMR mCRC patients were finally included.

RESULTS

A total of 313 eligible patients were divided into F (n = 70), R (n = 67), F plus PD-1 inhibitor (FP) (n = 95) and RP (n = 81) groups. The key clinical characteristics were well balanced among the groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the F, R, FP, and RP groups was 3.5 months, 3.6 months, 4.9 months, and 3.0 months, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.6 months, 15.7 months, 16.7 months, and 14.1 months. The FP regimen had an improved disease control rate (DCR) (P = 0.044) and 6-month PFS (P = 0.014) and exhibited a better trend in PFS (P = 0.057) compared with F, and it was also significantly better in PFS than RP (P = 0.030). RP did not confer a significant survival benefit; instead, the R group had a trend toward greater benefit with OS (P = 0.080) compared with RP. No significant differences were observed between the R and F groups in PFS or OS (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

FP is superior to F in achieving 6-month PFS and DCR, while RP is not better than R. FP has an improved PFS and 6-month PFS compared with RP, but F and R had similar clinical efficacy. Therefore, FP may be a highly promising strategy in the treatment of MSS/pMMR mCRC.

Metastatic colorectal cancer- third line therapy and beyond

INTRODUCTION

The outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved significantly in the last few decades. Metastatic colorectal cancer is a highly heterogenous cancer. Beyond second line chemotherapy, treatment decisions are often based on molecular testing.

METHOD

In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive summary of data from key clinical trials and discuss how to integrate these agents into the current treatment landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

In the era of precision medicine, molecular testing plays an increasingly important role in the management of mCRC. Efforts need to be made to target treatment based on molecular test results.

Simultaneous determination of 11 oral targeted antineoplastic drugs and 2 active metabolites by LC-MS/MS in human plasma and its application to therapeutic drug monitoring in cancer patients

Interindividual exposure differences have been identified in oral targeted antineoplastic drugs (OADs) owing to the pharmacogenetic background of the patients and their susceptibility to multiple factors, resulting in insufficient efficacy or adverse effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can prevent sub-optimal concentrations of OADs and improve their clinical treatment. This study aimed to develop and validate an LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of 11 OADs (gefitinib, imatinib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, everolimus, osimertinib, sunitinib, tamoxifen, lapatinib, fruquintinib and sorafenib) and 2 active metabolites (N-desethyl sunitinib and Z-endoxifen) in human plasma. Protein precipitation was used to extract OADs from the plasma samples. Chromatographic separation was performed using an Eclipse XDB-C18 (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) column with a gradient elution of the mobile phase composed of 2 mM ammonium acetate with 0.1 % formic acid in water (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Mass analysis was performed using positive ion mode electrospray ionization in multiple-reaction monitoring mode. The developed method was validated following FDA bioanalytical guidelines. The calibration curves were linear over the range of 2-400 ng/mL for gefitinib, imatinib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, and everolimus; 1-200 ng/mL for osimertinib, sunitinib, N-desethyl sunitinib, tamoxifen, and Z-endoxifen; and 5-1000 ng/mL for lapatinib, fruquintinib, and sorafenib, with all coefficients of correlation above 0.99. The intra- and inter-day imprecision was below 12.81 %. This method was successfully applied to the routine TDM of gefitinib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, osimertinib, fruquintinib, and sorafenib to optimize the dosage regimens.

Metabolism, toxicity and management of fruquintinib: a novel drug for metastatic colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer globally and despite therapeutic strides, the prognosis for patients with metastatic disease (mCRC) remains poor. Fruquintinib is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting VEGFR -1, -2, and -3, and has recently received approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides an overview of the pre-clinical data, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of fruquintinib, as well as the management of clinical toxicities associated with fruquintinib.

EXPERT OPINION

Fruquintinib is a valuable additional treatment option for patients with refractory mCRC. The pivotal role of vigilant toxicity management cannot be understated. While fruquintinib offers a convenient and overall, well-tolerated treatment option, ongoing research is essential to determine its efficacy in different patient subsets, evaluate it in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and determine its role in earlier lines of therapy.

Phase 1/1b open-label, dose-escalation study of fruquintinib in patients with advanced solid tumors in the United States

This open-label, phase 1/1b study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of fruquintinib in United States (U.S.) patients to confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) established in China. Patients with advanced solid tumors who had progressed on approved systemic therapy, were enrolled into 2 successive dose escalation cohorts, fruquintinib 3 mg (n = 7) or 5 mg (n = 7), orally, once daily (QD), 3 weeks on and 1 week off (3/1) with a 3 + 3 design followed by a dose expansion cohort at the RP2D 5 mg dose (n = 6). PK samples were collected on Days 1, 14, and 21 (Cycle 1). One of 6 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT)-evaluable patients in the 3 mg cohort had a DLT of grade 4 hypertension; there were no DLTs in the 5 mg cohort. The RP2D was confirmed to be 5 mg QD 3/1. All 20 patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event; grade ≥ 3 in 5 (71.4%; 3 mg dose) and 12 (92.3%; 5 mg dose) patients. Two patients had a confirmed partial response. After single and multiple doses, median peak plasma concentrations occurred at 2 h post-dose. Steady-state was achieved after 14 days of QD dosing with systemic exposure four-fold higher than that after a single dose. Fruquintinib was well tolerated, and the safety and PK profile at the 5 mg RP2D in U.S. patients with advanced solid tumors was consistent with dose-finding studies in China. Preliminary anticancer activity was observed. This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03251378.

Fruquintinib versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (FRESCO-2): an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of effective systemic therapy options for patients with advanced, chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib, a highly selective and potent oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) 1, 2, and 3, in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We conducted an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (FRESCO-2) at 124 hospitals and cancer centres across 14 countries. We included patients aged 18 years or older (≥20 years in Japan) with histologically or cytologically documented metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma who had received all current standard approved cytotoxic and targeted therapies and progressed on or were intolerant to trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib, or both. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive fruquintinib (5 mg capsule) or matched placebo orally once daily on days 1-21 in 28-day cycles, plus best supportive care. Stratification factors were previous trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib, or both, RAS mutation status, and duration of metastatic disease. Patients, investigators, study site personnel, and sponsors, except for selected sponsor pharmacovigilance personnel, were masked to study group assignments. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause. A non-binding futility analysis was done when approximately one-third of the expected overall survival events had occurred. Final analysis occurred after 480 overall survival events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04322539, and EudraCT, 2020-000158-88, and is ongoing but not recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 12, 2020, and Dec 2, 2021, 934 patients were assessed for eligibility and 691 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive fruquintinib (n=461) or placebo (n=230). Patients had received a median of 4 lines (IQR 3-6) of previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease, and 502 (73%) of 691 patients had received more than 3 lines. Median overall survival was 7·4 months (95% CI 6·7-8·2) in the fruquintinib group versus 4·8 months (4·0-5·8) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·55-0·80; p<0·0001). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 286 (63%) of 456 patients who received fruquintinib and 116 (50%) of 230 who received placebo; the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the fruquintinib group included hypertension (n=62 [14%]), asthenia (n=35 [8%]), and hand-foot syndrome (n=29 [6%]). There was one treatment-related death in each group (intestinal perforation in the fruquintinib group and cardiac arrest in the placebo group).

INTERPRETATION

Fruquintinib treatment resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful benefit in overall survival compared with placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. These data support the use of fruquintinib as a global treatment option for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Ongoing analysis of the quality of life data will further establish the clinical benefit of fruquintinib in this patient population.

FUNDING

HUTCHMED.

Evaluation of Fruquintinib in the Continuum of Care of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

The management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has the continuum of care as the treatment paradigm. To date, trifluridine/tipiracil, a biochemically modulated fluoropyrimidine, and regorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, remain the main options for the majority of patients who progressed to standard doublet- or triplet-based chemotherapies, although a tailored approach could be indicated in certain circumstances. Being highly selective for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1, -2 and -3, fruquintinib demonstrated a strong anti-tumor activity in preclinical models and received approval from China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in 2018 for the treatment of patients with chemo-refractory mCRC. The approval was based on the results of the phase III FRESCO trial. Then, in order to overcome geographic differences in clinical practice, the FRESCO-2 trial was conducted in the US, Europe, Japan, and Australia. In a heavily pretreated patient population, the study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating an advantage of fruquintinib over a placebo in overall survival (OS). Here, we review the clinical development of fruquintinib and its perspectives in gastrointestinal cancers. Then, we discuss the introduction of fruquintinib in the continuum of care of CRC paying special attention to unmet needs, including the identification of cross-resistant and potentially susceptible populations, evaluation of radiological response, and identification of novel biomarkers of clinical benefit.

Phase 1b/2 trial of fruquintinib plus sintilimab in treating advanced solid tumours: The dose-escalation and metastatic colorectal cancer cohort in the dose-expansion phases

BACKGROUND

Fruquintinib (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor 1/2/3) plus sintilimab (anti-programmed death-1) demonstrated enhanced anti-tumour effects versus monotherapy in a preclinical study. We investigated the combination in patients with advanced solid tumours, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

In this phase 1b/2, open-label, multi-centre, multi-cohort dose-escalation and dose-expansion study, patients with advanced solid tumours (dose-escalation) or mCRC (one cohort in dose-expansion) received different doses of fruquintinib plus a fixed dose of sintilimab once every 4 weeks (Q4W) or 3 weeks (Q3W). Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and the preliminary efficacy. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03903705.

FINDINGS

By the data cut-off date (30th December 2021), 23 patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation and 37 patients in the mCRC cohort of the dose-expansion; 44 patients with mCRC who received sintilimab Q3W were pooled for analysis. One dose-limiting toxicity event (grade 3 troponin T increased) occurred during the dose escalation. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 43.5% and 47.7% of patients in the dose-escalation phase and pooled mCRC analysis, respectively. Among patients treated with the recommended phase 2 dose (fruquintinib 5 mg once daily, 2 weeks on/1 week off, plus sintilimab 200 mg Q3W) in pooled mCRC analysis, the objective response rate was 23.8% (95% CI 8.2-47.2), median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.4-8.3), and overall survival was 14.8 months (95% CI 8.8-not reached); in patients with mismatch repair-proficient mCRC, these were 20.0% (95% CI 4.3-48.1), 6.9 months (95% CI 4.8-10.1), and 20.0 months (95% CI 8.1-not reached), respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Fruquintinib plus sintilimab was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumours and showed promising efficacy in mCRC.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib and regorafenib in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study

Background

Fruquintinib and regorafenib have been approved for the third-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in China. However, at present, there is a lack of head-to-head clinical trials on the comparison of efficacy and safety between the two drugs.

Materials and methods

The data of patients with mCRC who were treated with fruquintinib or regorafenib after the standard chemotherapy in Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from October 2018 to November 2021 were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. The secondary endpoints were the appropriate sequence, objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of fruquintinib and regorafenib.

Results

A total of 105 patients were enrolled in this study. The ORR of fruquintinib group (n=55) and regorafenib group (n=50) were 6.1% and 2.0%; the DCR were 65.3% and 54.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in median OS (mOS) and PFS (mPFS) between the two groups (mOS:14.2 vs12.0 months, p=0.057; mPFS:4.4 vs 3.5 months, p=0.150). Combined immunotherapy showed a synergistic effect. The mPFS and mOS of fruquintinib combined with anti-PD-1 therapy were longer than those of fruquintinib monotherapy (mPFS:5.9 vs 3.0 months, p=0.009; mOS:17.5 vs 11.3 months, p=0.008). The mOS of patients treated with regorafenib combined with anti-PD-1 therapy was 14.8 months higher than that of regorafenib monotherapy (p=0.045). When combined with anti-PD-1 therapy, the mPFS and mOS of fruquintinib was significantly longer than regorafenib (mPFS:5.9 vs 3.8 months, p=0.018; mOS:17.5 vs 14.8 months, p=0.044). In the treatment sequence, the OS of patients treated with regorafenib and then fruquintinib was significantly longer than that of the reverse treatment sequence (15.0 vs 8.3 months, p=0.019). The adverse reactions were generally similar, but the incidence of hand-foot syndrome of regorafenib was higher than that of fruquintinib, while fruquintinib was more prone to grade 3 hypertension.

Conclusion

Fruquintinib monotherapy showed better disease control rate and objective remission rate in the post-line therapy of metastasis colorectal cancer. Notably, the combination of PD-1 immunotherapy brought the additional effect, especially in the fruquintinib combined with anti-PD-1 therapy. Patients treated with regorafenib and then fruquintinib was significantly longer than that of the reverse treatment sequence. The toxicity of fruquintinib and regorafenib are similar.

Fruquintinib in Combination With PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Refractory Non-MSI-H/pMMR Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Study in China

Background

Fruquintinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, is a new anticancer drug independently developed in China to treat refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In Japan, regorafenib combined with nivolumab has been demonstrated to be promising in patients with refractory mCRC. Here, in a real-world study, we were aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fruquintinib with various programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors after standard treatment in Chinese non-microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair proficient mCRC patients.

Methods

A total of 45 patients with refractory mCRC were involved in the study. They received fruquintinib (3 or 5 mg, orally administered once a day for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off in 4-week cycles) and a PD-1 inhibitor(200 mg pembrolizumab, 3 mg/kg nivolumab, 200 mg sintilimab or camrelizumab, intravenously administered on D1 once every 3 weeks). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and objective response rate (ORR) were reviewed and evaluated.

Results

Among the 45 patients, the median age was 54 years (29-85). The ORR was 11.1% (5/45), DCR 62.2% (28/45), median PFS equal 3.8 months, and median OS was 14.9 months. The response duration was 3.4 months. PFS between left and right primary tumors and PFS with or without lung metastases were both not significantly different (p &gt; 0.05), which was inconsistent with the result of REGONIVO study. The multivariate analysis indicated no association of OS benefit in the specified subgroups. No adverse-effect-related deaths were reported.

Conclusions

Fruquintinib, in combination with anti-PD-1, was observed to have clinical activity in a small population of patients with heavily pretreated mCRC in our center. Further studies are needed to verify this outcome in a large population.

Real-World Data: Fruquintinib in Treating Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Fruquintinib, also called HMPL-013, was first discovered by Hutchison Whampoa Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China, and it is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor. In clinical trials, fruquintinib has demonstrated a survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of fruquintinib in real-world patients. We collected data from patients with mCRC treated with oral fruquintinib from 2018 to 2020 in six different institutions. Patients with mCRC initially received 5 mg of oral fruquintinib daily for 3 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The efficacy and safety of fruquintinib were also assessed. Seventy-five patients were involved in our study, and 29.3% of patients achieved stable disease (SD). Median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.841–5.959). The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with fruquintinib were acceptable with grade 3 TEAEs of 6%. The grade 3 TEAEs were hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR), fatigue, and stomatitis. The ECOG performance status was associated with PFS. In this real-world study, the clinical activity of fruquintinib was consistent with what has been reported in previous clinical trials. The level of safety was acceptable, and the side effects were manageable.

Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular docking of new benzofuran and indole derivatives as tubulin polymerization inhibitors

Microtubules and the mitotic spindle have become an important target for cancer treatment due to their critical role in cell division. In this work, a novel series of benzofuran and indole derivatives were designed and synthesized, to be evaluated as tubulin polymerization inhibitors. 2-Acetylbenzofuran derivatives 1a,b and 3-acetylindole 1c were condensed with Wittig reagents 2a-d and Wittig-Horner reagents 3a-e to afford the respective 2-ethylidene derivatives 5a-j and 7a-e. Also, iminomethylene triphenylphosphine (2e) reacted with 1a,b to afford benzofuran-2-ylethylidene aniline derivatives 6a,b. In addition, compounds 1a,b reacted with trialkylphosphites 4a-c to give 1:1 adduct for which the Oxaphospholo[4,3-b]benzofuran-7-yl)diazene derivatives 8a-f, were assigned. The possible reactions mechanisms were discussed and structural reasoning for the new compounds were based upon spectroscopic data. Their antiproliferative activities against two cell lines namely, HepG2 and MCF7 cells were then evaluated. It was found that the benzofuran compounds 5b, 6a, and 8c exhibited the strongest antiproliferative activities against both cell lines compared to doxorubicin. By studying the mechanism of action, compound 6a showed good inhibition of tubulin polymerization which leads to mitotic spindle formation disruption, cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase, and apoptosis of HepG2 cells. A conducted docking study confirmed the in vitro results indicating that compound 6a fitted properly at the colchicine binding site of tubulin. Based on these findings, compound 6a can be considered as a promising anticancer candidate that can be subjected for further development as a tubulin polymerization inhibitor for treating liver and breast cell carcinoma.

FRESCO-2: a global Phase III study investigating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in metastatic colorectal cancer

Fruquintinib, a novel, highly selective, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF receptors (VEGFRs)-1, -2 and -3, is approved in China for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. FRESCO-2, a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study, is investigating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Key inclusion criteria include: progression on or intolerance to TAS-102 and/or regorafenib; and prior treatment with approved chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy, and, if RAS wild-type, anti-EGFR therapy. Approximately 687 patients will be randomized 2:1 to fruquintinib plus best supportive care or placebo plus best supportive care. Primary and key secondary end points are overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. FRESCO-2 is enrolling in the USA, Europe, Australia and Japan.

Anti-angiogenic Agents: A Review on Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) Inhibitors

Tumor growth inhibition can be achieved by inhibiting angiogenesis, which has been a field of great concern in recent years. Important targets to inhibit angiogenesis include vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and its homologous tyrosine kinase receptor. Anti-angiogenic therapy based on inhibition of VEGFR-2 is an effective clinical treatment strategy. The research progress of VEGFR-2 inhibitors is reviewed in this paper from the aspects of drug development and chemical synthesis.

Combining PD-1 Inhibitor with VEGF/VEGFR2 Inhibitor in Chemotherapy: Report of a Patient with End-Stage Cholangiocarcinoma and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second-largest liver cancer, and develops from the biliary epithelium, where it discretely progresses. Unfortunately, many patients miss the opportunity of performing surgery when diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma, and due to its chemotherapeutic insensitivity, its control has always been considered difficult.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we present a case of stage 4 cholangiocarcinoma being controlled by the combination of chemotherapy with PD-1 and VEGF/VEGFR2 inhibitors.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient is a 58-year-old male who was diagnosed with a progressed cholangiocarcinoma 2 years ago. From the beginning, metastases were discovered in multiple places, and the patient was unsuccessfully treated with 3 chemotherapy regimens. Therefore, a new therapeutic method was considered, and that involved the testing of a new combination of chemotherapy with PD-1 and VEGF/VEGFR2 inhibitors.

RESULTS

After 6 courses of treatment with this combination, the patient's lesions became smaller and stable.

CONCLUSION

Our case highlights the possibility of combining chemotherapy with PD-1 and VEGF/ VEGFR2 inhibitors for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma patients. This combination may herald new hope for patients who run out of regimens.

Combination of Anti-EGFR and Anti-VEGF Drugs for the Treatment of Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review

The standard third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) includes the small-molecule anti-vascular drugs (Regofenib and Fruquintinib) and the chemotherapy drug trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102). There is no standard treatment for mCRC if the third-line treatment failed. Therefore, it is a pressing need to develop new therapeutic approaches to improve the survival of patients who developed drug resistance to the third-line treatment. In this study, we report a case of mCRC with RAS/BRAF wild-type, who was successfully treated using cetuximab in combination with fruquintinib after resistance to chemotherapy, bevacizumab, cetuximab and regorafenib. This patient responded to this combination regimen. Then, we discuss the mechanisms of action of this combination. Furthermore, we introduce the clinical trials on the combination regimens of anti-EGFR with anti-vascular monoclonal antibodies. Finally, we discuss the clinical explorations of using combination of anti-EGFR with small-molecule anti-VEGF drugs and their potential benefits. The clinical effects of small-molecule anti-vascular drugs in combination with anti-EGFR in the treatment of CRC warrant further explored.

[Research Progress of Small Molecule Anti-angiogenic Drugs in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

肺癌是世界上发病率最高的癌症之一，且尚无二线进展后的标准治疗方案，而肿瘤血管生成目前已被确定为恶性肿瘤的重要治疗靶点，小分子多靶点血管激酶抑制剂可通过抑制血管生成相关信号通路，抑制肿瘤血管的生成。目前已开展多项小分子抗血管生成药物治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床试验，且已有部分血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂（vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, VEGFR-TKIs）获批治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌，本文基于国内外多项小分子抗血管生成药物治疗非小细胞肺癌的发展现状，归纳了多个VEGFR-TKIs及成纤维细胞生长因子受体（fibroblast growth factor receptor, FGFR）-TKI单药或联合[包括分别与化疗、表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）-TKIs、免疫治疗、放疗等联合）]治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效与安全性研究，同时探讨了VEGFR-TKIs可能存在的耐药机制及疗效预测指标等，并对未来抗血管治疗非小细胞肺癌的发展趋势以及存在的潜在问题进行展望，同时为肺癌后续的精准治疗及个体化治疗提供新的思路。

Up-and-Coming Experimental Drug Options for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the top causes of cancer and cancer-related deaths worldwide. The prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer is poor and treatment options are limited. Many patients will run out of treatment options before they become medically unfit for therapy. As such, there is a need to expand upon the current understanding of disease biology as well as drug resistance mechanisms in order to create new approaches for therapy. In this review article, we will discuss the mechanistic rationale and clinical data for new drugs and therapeutic combinations under development for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Safety Profile and Adverse Events of Special Interest for Fruquintinib in Chinese Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Analysis of the Phase 3 FRESCO Trial

INTRODUCTION

In FRESCO (Fruquintinib Efficacy and Safety in 3+ Line Colorectal Cancer Patients) trial, fruquintinib demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful overall survival benefit in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, its safety profile, including adverse events of special interest (AESIs) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), is not well known. The present analysis evaluated the safety profile and AESIs for fruquintinib in the FRESCO trial.

METHODS

In FRESCO, eligible Chinese patients were randomized (2:1) to receive fruquintinib (5 mg once daily for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off in 28-day cycles) or placebo plus best supportive care. Treatment-related AESIs and time to first occurrence of AESIs were summarized. Treatment-related TEAEs by age, sex, and BMI were also summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 266 patients (95.7%) in the fruquintinib group and 97 (70.8%) in the placebo group had at least one treatment-related TEAE; the mean relative dose intensity was 92% and 98%, respectively. In the fruquintinib group, the most common (in > 40% of patients) treatment-related AESIs were hypertension (55.4%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome [known as hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR)] (49.3%), and proteinuria (42.1%). The most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 AESIs (≥ 3% of patients) were hypertension (21.2%), HFSR (10.8%), and proteinuria (3.2%); the median time to onset of these events was 10, 21, and 20 days, respectively. Subgroup analysis by age, sex, and BMI revealed that the frequencies of treatment-related TEAEs were similar across all subgroups, and were consistent with the overall safety profile of fruquintinib.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 AEs were hypertension, HFSR, and proteinuria. The treatment-related TEAE profile of fruquintinib in Chinese patents with mCRC was comparable among different subgroups and consistent with that reported in the overall population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials identifier NCT02314819.

Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Current Challenges and Future Prospects

Despite advances, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) still have poor long-term survival. Identification of molecular subtypes is important to guide therapy through standard treatment pathways and holds promise for the development of new treatments. Following standard first- and second-line chemotherapy plus targeted agents, many patients retain a reasonable performance status, and thus are seeking further effective treatment to extend life and maintain symptom control. The challenge lies in selecting the most appropriate therapy in the third- and fourth-line settings, from a range of options including the relatively new oral agents TAS-102 and regorafenib, or rechallenge with previous chemotherapy or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAB). Beyond this, therapy consists of trials involving novel agents and new combinations of treatments with theoretical synergy and/or non-overlapping toxicity. There is a great focus on enhancing immunogenicity in mCRC, to reflect the impressive results of immunotherapy drugs in the small cohort with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) mCRC. Rare molecular subtypes of mCRC are increasingly being identified, including Her2-positive disease, NTRK fusions and others. Clinical trials exploring the efficacy of immunomodulatory and precision agents are plentiful and will hopefully yield clinically meaningful results that can be rapidly translated into routine care.

A Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of fruquintinib in Chinese patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer - The FALUCA study

OBJECTIVES

Fruquintinib is an orally active kinase inhibitor that selectively targets the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor. A Phase II trial has demonstrated a significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) for fruquintinib-treated patients with locally advanced/metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed after second-line chemotherapy. This Phase III trial is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial to confirm fruquintinib's efficacy in the same patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 2015 to February 2018, 730 patients were screened, of whom 527 were enrolled into the study. Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive fruquintinib (n = 354) or placebo (n = 173) once daily for 3 weeks on-treatment, and 1 week off-treatment. Patients were stratified according to epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status and prior use of VEGF inhibitors. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median OS was 8.9 months for the fruquintinib group and 10.4 months for placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.28; P = 0.841), with median PFS of 3.7 months and 1.0 months, respectively (HR 0.34; 95 % CI, 0.28-0.43; P < 0.001). Objective response rate and disease control rate were 13.8 % and 66.7 % for fruquintinib, and 0.6 % and 24.9 % for placebo, respectively (P < 0.001). Hypertension was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event (≥grade 3) observed in fruquintinib-treated patients (21.0 %). Post hoc analysis revealed that fruquintinib prolonged the median OS for patients who did not receive subsequent antitumor therapy: 7.0 months versus 5.1 months for placebo (HR 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.46-0.91; P = 0.012). Patients receiving fruquintinib also reported improvements in quality of life for most functional scales measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint, fruquintinib could be effective in combination with other agents for the treatment of patients with NSCLC who have failed second-line chemotherapy.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib as third-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of addition of fruquintinib to best supportive care (BSC) in third-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

To conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis, a Markov model was established to simulate the course of metastatic CRC. Three health states-progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD), and death-were included. Clinical data were derived from the FRESCO trial and health utility values were extracted from previous literature. The primary outcome of the study was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in US dollars per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from a Chinese societal perspective. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the study.

RESULTS

Addition of fruquintinib to BSC gained 0.54 QALY at a cost of $15,404.57 while the BSC group gained 0.38 QALY at a cost of $9603.94. ICER of fruquintinib versus BSC was $36,253.94/QALY. In the 1-way sensitivity analyses, utility for PD in both groups, utility for PFS in both groups, and cost of fruquintinib significantly influenced the results of the analysis. At the willingness-to-pay threshold of $28,988.40/QALY, probabilities of addition of fruquintinib to BSC or BSC alone as the cost-effective option were 0% and 100%, indicating addition of fruquintinib is not a dominant option compared with BSC.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of fruquintinib to BSC is not a cost-effective regimen in the third-line setting for patients with metastatic CRC from the Chinese societal perspective.

Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials?

PURPOSE

Direct randomized comparisons of regorafenib, TAS-102, and fruquintinib for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of three agents by a systematic review and a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We included phase III randomized controlled trials in the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov registry from initiation until January 2019. Data from randomized controlled trials including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted. Direct meta-analysis and indirect meta-analysis using network meta-analysis were assessed.

RESULTS

Five trials comprising a total of 2586 patients were included. For efficacy analysis of OS, no statistically significant differences were observed between regorafenib and TAS-102 (HR 0.945, 95% CI [0.677, 1.320], P = 0.753), regorafenib and fruquintinib (HR 1.056, 95% CI [0.690, 1.621], P = 0.814), or TAS-102 and fruquintinib (HR 1.117, 95% CI [0.740, 1.685], P = 0.610). However, fruquintinib was superior in PFS compared with TAS-102 (HR 1.756, 95% CI [1.079, 2.857], P = 0.023). Regorafenib and TAS-102 appeared to have a similar effect on PFS (HR 0.907, 95% CI [0.611, 1.346], P = 0.641), as did regorafenib and fruquintinib (HR 1.592, 95% CI [0.968, 2.618], P = 0.067). None of the three agents were better in terms of all grade AEs or any grade of 3-5 AEs. However, subgroup analysis of AEs exhibited different toxicity profiles between the three drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Indirect comparison suggested that the three agents had similar OS but that fruquintinib was superior in terms of PFS compared with that of TAS-102. These three agents had different toxicity profiles.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel shikonin-benzo[b]furan derivatives as tubulin polymerization inhibitors targeting the colchicine binding site

A novel series of shikonin-benzo[b]furan derivatives were designed and synthesized as tubulin polymerization inhibitors, and their biological activities were evaluated. Most compounds revealed the comparable anti-proliferation activities against the cancer cell lines to that of shikonin and simultaneously low cytotoxicity to non-cancer cells. Among them, compound 6c displayed powerful anti-cancer activity with the IC₅₀ value of 0.18 μM against HT29 cells, which was significantly better than that of the reference drugs shikonin and CA-4. What's more, 6c could inhibit tubulin polymerization and compete with [³H] colchicine in binding to tubulin. Further biological studies depicted that 6c can induce cell apoptosis and cell mitochondria depolarize, regulate the expression of apoptosis related proteins in HT29 cells. Besides, 6c actuated the HT29 cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase, and influenced the expression of the cell-cycle related protein. Moreover, 6c displayed potent inhibition on cell migration and tube formation that contributes to the antiangiogenesis. These results prompt us to consider 6c as a potential tubulin polymerization inhibitor and is worthy for further study.

Fruquintinib: a novel antivascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Angiogenesis plays a critical role in the neoplastic growth, progression, and metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) in a process regulated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family members and their receptors (VEGFR). Several small-molecule anti-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as regorafenib, famitinib, axitinib and apatinib, have been shown to be effective in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Fruquintinib (ELUNATE^®) is a novel oral anti-VEGFR TKI, originated and developed by Hutchison MediPharma. Fruquintinib is a potent and highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of VEGFR-1, -2 and -3. In the Phase 3 FRESCO trial, fruquintinib improved both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with mCRC, compared with placebo. Fruquintinib also showed an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. Based on the data from this trial, fruquintinib was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) in 2018, for the treatment of patients with mCRC who had undergone at least two prior standard anticancer therapies. The existing clinical trials and future prospects of fruquintinib in mCRC will be discussed in this article. In addition, to better understand the role of fruquintinib in this setting, recent advances in other anti-VEGFR TKIs for mCRC treatment are also reviewed herein.

Validated UPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of fruquintinib in rat plasma and its application to pharmacokinetic study

A new, simple, and sensitive ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for quantification of fruquintinib was established to assess the pharmacokinetics of fruquintinib in the rat. The internal standard working solution was added to the plasma sample for extraction before analysis. The Acquity UPLC BEH C18 chromatography column (2.1 mm ×50 mm, 1.7 μm) was used to separated analytes under gradient elution using acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid as the mobile phase. Positive multiple reaction monitoring modes were chosen to detect fruquintinib and diazepam (IS). The precursor-to-product ion transitions were 394.2 → 363.2 for fruquintinib and m/z 285 → 154 for IS. The current method was linear over the concentration range of 1.0-1000 ng/mL for fruquintinib with a correlation coefficient of 0.9992 or better. The matrix effect of fruquintinib and IS was acceptable under the current method. The intra- and interday precision (RSD%) and accuracy (RE%) were within 11.9% and ±13.7%, respectively. The recovery, stability, and sensitivity were validated according to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations for bioanalytical method validation. The analytical method had been validated and applied to a pharmacokinetic study of fruquintinib in rat.

Fruquintinib and its use in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Fruquintinib is a potent, highly selective and orally active inhibitor of VEGFR1, 2, 3 tyrosine kinases. It inhibits VEGF-induced VEGFR2 phosphorylation, endothelial cell proliferation and tubule formation. Currently, it has been approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in patients who have failed at least two prior systemic antineoplastic therapies in China. However, it is not approved outside China, and there is another similar small molecular VEGFR multitarget drug approved in China, USA, Europe, etc. Here, we summarize the mechanism characteristics and clinical development of fruquintinib supporting its use in the treatment of metastastic colorectal cancer as well as explorations in other tumor types.

Fruquintinib: First Global Approval

Fruquintinib (Elunate^®) is an orally available, potent and highly selective small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR-1, -2 and -3 that was discovered and developed by Hutchison MediPharma for the treatment of solid tumours. In September 2018, fruquintinib received its first global approval, in China, for use in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients who have failed at least two prior systemic anti-neoplastic therapies. Fruquintinib is in ongoing phase III clinical development for use in the treatment of advanced NSCLC and advanced gastric cancer. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of fruquintinib leading to this first approval for the treatment of metastatic CRC.

Effects of a High-fat Meal on the Pharmacokinetics of the VEGFR Inhibitor Fruquintinib: A Randomized Phase I Study in Healthy Subjects

PURPOSE

Fruquintinib is a potent and highly selective oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and demonstrates promising activity against a broad spectrum of cancer types. The objective of the study was to investigate the tolerability and effect of high-fat food on the pharmacokinetic profile of a fruquintinib capsule in healthy Chinese subjects.

METHODS

Healthy Chinese male subjects aged between 18 and 45 years were enrolled in the study. The study included 2 phases: a dose-escalation phase and a food effect-assessment phase. In the dose-escalation phase, subjects were administered a single dose of fruquintinib (2, 3, or 4 mg) in the fasted state. In the food effect-assessment phase, subjects were administered a 4-mg fruquintinib capsule in the fasted and fed states, respectively, in 2 cycles. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected at the designated time points. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study by physical examination including vital sign measurements, clinical laboratory tests, 12-lead ECG, clinical assessments, and monitoring for and spontaneous reporting of adverse events.

FINDINGS

Twenty-nine eligible male subjects were enrolled in the study, including 9 in the dose-escalation phase and 20 in the food effect-assessment phase. In the food effect-assessment phase, the ratios (90% CI) of the geometric mean AUC_0-∞ and C_max values for fruquintinib in the fed state to those observed in the fasted state were 97.2% (94.0%-100.4%) and 82.9% (76.7%-89.5%), respectively. The mean (SD) T_max values of fruquintinib were 3.0 (1.0) and 5.6 (4.5) hours in the fasted and fed states, respectively. The most common adverse events possibly related to the study drug were elevated blood uric acid, diarrhea, and decreased white blood cell count.

IMPLICATIONS

The overall bioavailability of the evaluated formulation of fruquintinib was not affected by the consumption of a high-fat, high-calorie meal prior to dosing. However, the consumption of a high-fat, high-calorie meal prior to dosing prolonged the T_max. These results indicate that the fruquintinib capsule can be administered with or without food. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01955304.

Targeting Angiogenesis in Colorectal Carcinoma

Neo-angiogenesis plays a key role in colorectal cancer, with the vascular endothelial growth factor family proteins and their receptors in particular triggering multiple signaling networks that result in endothelial cell survival, migration, mitogenesis, differentiation, and vascular permeability. Anti-angiogenic therapies have improved colorectal cancer prognosis within the past 15 years. Bevacizumab demonstrated efficacy in combination with chemotherapy under different conditions, including as first- and second-line therapies, and also as a maintenance treatment strategy. Other drugs targeting angiogenesis effectors (e.g., ramucirumab and aflibercept) were approved after bevacizumab failure, confirming the concept of "continuous anti-angiogenic blocking". Recently, a number of new orally available multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been tested in late-stage clinical trials, with modest efficacy. Due to the availability of several anti-angiogenic agents, we need well-designed prospective randomized trials to optimize therapeutic sequencing. The place of biosimilars in the therapeutic armamentarium remains unclear at the moment. Further research is warranted to identify robust predictive biomarkers of efficacy and innovative clinically meaningful anti-angiogenic drugs that are cost-efficient.

Effect of Fruquintinib vs Placebo on Overall Survival in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The FRESCO Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) have limited effective and tolerable treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral fruquintinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, as third-line or later therapy in patients with metastatic CRC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

FRESCO (Fruquintinib Efficacy and Safety in 3+ Line Colorectal Cancer Patients) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter (28 hospitals in China), phase 3 clinical trial. From December 2014 to May 2016, screening took place among 519 patients aged 18 to 75 years who had metastatic CRC that progressed after at least 2 lines of chemotherapy but had not received VEGFR inhibitor therapy; 416 met the eligibility criteria and were stratified by prior anti-VEGF therapy and K-ras status. The final date of follow-up was January 17, 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either fruquintinib, 5 mg (n = 278) or placebo (n = 138) orally, once daily for 21 days, followed by 7 days off in 28-day cycles, until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or study withdrawal.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was overall survival. Key secondary efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival (time from randomization to disease progression or death), objective response rate (confirmed complete or partial response), and disease control rate (complete or partial response, or stable disease recorded ≥8 weeks postrandomization). Duration of response was also assessed. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 416 randomized patients (mean age, 54.6 years; 161 [38.7%] women), 404 (97.1%) completed the trial. Median overall survival was significantly prolonged with fruquintinib compared with placebo (9.3 months [95% CI, 8.2-10.5] vs 6.6 months [95% CI, 5.9-8.1]); hazard ratio (HR) for death, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.51-0.83; P < .001). Median progression-free survival was also significantly increased with fruquintinib (3.7 months [95% CI, 3.7-4.6] vs 1.8 months [95% CI, 1.8-1.8] months); HR for progression or death, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.34; P < .001). Grades 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 61.2% (170) of patients who received fruquintinib and 19.7% (27) who received placebo. Serious adverse events were reported by 15.5% (43) of patients in the fruquintinib group and 5.8% (8) in the placebo group, with 14.4% (40) of fruquintinib-treated and 5.1% (7) of placebo-treated patients requiring hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among Chinese patients with metastatic CRC who had tumor progression following at least 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, oral fruquintinib compared with placebo resulted in a statistically significant increase in overall survival. Further research is needed to assess efficacy outside of China.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02314819.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Phase II Study of Fruquintinib After Two Prior Chemotherapy Regimens in Chinese Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non‒Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose Patients with advanced non‒small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who fail two lines of chemotherapy have unmet medical needs. The kinase inhibitor fruquintinib selectively targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and, hence, tumor angiogenesis and lymphogenesis. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC who experienced disease progression after second-line chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were randomly assigned (two to one; stratified by epidermal growth factor receptor status) to receive fruquintinib or placebo, both in combination with best supportive care. Oral fruquintinib (5 mg once daily) was given in 4-week cycles of 3 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week off. Tumor response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) evaluated by a blinded image central review (BICR) committee. Secondary end points included investigator-evaluated PFS, objective response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety. Results Ninety-one patients from 12 hospitals received treatment with fruquintinib (n = 61) or placebo (n = 30). Median PFS was 3.8 months with fruquintinib by both BICR and investigators' evaluations (hazard ratio by BICR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.57; P < .001). Three- and 6-month survival rates were 90.2% and 67.2% in the fruquintinib group and 73.3% and 58.8% in the placebo group, respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 13.1% and 60.7% with fruquintinib, compared with 0% and 13.3% with placebo ( P = .041 and < .001), respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events with fruquintinib (≥ grade 3) were hypertension (8.2%), hand-foot syndrome (4.9%), and proteinuria (4.9%). Conclusion Third- and fourth-line fruquintinib for advanced NSCLC was superior to placebo and had an acceptable safety profile.

Clinical trials of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for lung cancer in China: a review

With the development of evidence-based medicine, clinical trials have become necessary for investigating and validating the efficacy of new treatments. Over the past 10 years, several clinical trials of new anticancer agents have been designed and launched in China; this has greatly promoted the development of novel agents as well as of innovative clinical study designs. However, despite the significant advances made in clinical trials for novel agents, improvements are still required. In this mini-review, we will summarize the ongoing clinical trials of small molecular inhibitors for the treatment of lung cancer in China, aiming specifically to highlight the active involvement of China in these clinical studies. Furthermore, we will discuss the urgent need for improvement of clinical trials and anticancer agent research in China.

A phase I study to investigate the metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of [14C]fruquintinib, a novel oral selective VEGFR inhibitor, in healthy Chinese male volunteers

PURPOSE

Fruquintinib (HMPL-013) is a novel, potent, and highly selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (1, 2 and 3). This study was conducted to investigate the metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of HMPL-013 after a single oral dose to healthy Chinese men.

METHODS

Six subjects were administrated an oral suspension containing 5 mg of ¹⁴C-labeled HMPL-013 (100 μCi) in a fasted state. Blood and excreta samples were collected at the designated time points or intervals for pharmacokinetics and radiometric analyses. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the study.

RESULTS

Over a 336-h post-dose collection period, mean recovery was 90.11% of the radiolabeled dose, with 60.31% in urine and 29.80% in feces. Mean C _max, AUC_0-∞, and T _max for HMPL-013 in plasma were 113 ng/mL, 4797 h ng/mL, and 2 h, respectively. Radioactivity and HMPL-013 were cleared from circulation with terminal half-lives of 41.1 and 33.4 h. HMPL-013 was the predominant circulating radioactive component, representing 72.48% of the total radioactivity. M11 was the major circulating metabolite, accounting for 17.31% of the total radioactivity. An additional seven circulating metabolites were identified, each accounting for less than 5% of the total radioactivity. In urine, HMPL-013 accounted for only 0.50% of the administered dose. Three major metabolites M285, M381, and M409-4 were identified in urine accounting for 10.48, 21.16, and 8.92% of the dose, respectively. In feces, HMPL-013 accounted for 5.34% of the dose. M205, M365-2, and M380 were the major metabolites, accounting for 2.29, 3.30, and 2.59% of the dose, respectively.

CONCLUSION

HMPL-013 was well tolerated and absorbed rapidly, with parent compound being the predominant circulating component. HMPL-013 was extensively metabolized prior to excretion, and urine was the major route of excretion.

Safety and efficacy of fruquintinib in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase Ib study and a randomized double-blind phase II study

BACKGROUND

To assess the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.

METHODS

A phase Ib open-label study and phase II randomized, placebo-controlled trial compared the efficacy of fruquintinib plus best supportive care (BSC) with placebo plus BSC in mCRC patients with ≥2 lines of prior therapies. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

In the phase Ib study, 42 patients took fruquintinib 5 mg for 3 weeks on/1 week off. The median PFS was 5.80 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.88 months. In the phase II study, 71 patients were randomized (47 to fruquintinib, 24 to placebo). PFS was significantly improved with fruquintinib plus BSC (4.73 months; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.86-5.59) versus placebo plus BSC (0.99 months; 95% CI 0.95-1.58); (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30; 95% CI 0.15-0.59; P < 0.001). The median OS was 7.72 versus 5.52 months (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.38-1.34). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension and hand-foot skin reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Fruquintinib showed a significant PFS benefit of 3.7 months in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC. The safety profile was consistent with that of VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A randomized phase III confirmatory study in mCRC is underway.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01975077 and NCT02196688.