1
|
Souwer ETD, Sanchez-Spitman A, Moes DJAR, Gelderblom H, Swen JJ, Portielje JEA, Guchelaar HJ, van Gelder T. Tamoxifen pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in older patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 199:471-478. [PMID: 37067610 PMCID: PMC10175413 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06925-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to study the pharmacokinetics and -dynamics of tamoxifen in older women with non-metastatic breast cancer. METHODS Data for this analysis were derived from the CYPTAM study (NTR1509) database. Patients were stratified by age (age groups < 65 and 65 and older). Steady-state trough concentrations were measured of tamoxifen, N-desmethyltamoxifen, 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen, and endoxifen. CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 phenotypes were assessed for all patients by genotyping. Multiple linear regression models were used to analyze tamoxifen and endoxifen variability. Outcome data included recurrence-free survival at time of tamoxifen discontinuation (RFSt) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS 668 patients were included, 141 (21%) were 65 and older. Demographics and treatment duration were similar across age groups. Older patients had significantly higher concentrations of tamoxifen 129.4 ng/ml (SD 53.7) versus 112.2 ng/ml (SD 42.0) and endoxifen 12.1 ng/ml (SD 6.6) versus 10.7 ng/ml (SD 5.7, p all < 0.05), independently of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 gene polymorphisms. Age independently explained 5% of the variability of tamoxifen (b = 0.95, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.051) and 0.1% of the variability in endoxifen concentrations (b = 0.45, p = 0.12, R2 = 0.007). Older patients had worse RFSt (5.8 versus 7.3 years, p = 0.01) and worse OS (7.8 years versus 8.7 years, p = 0.01). This was not related to differences in endoxifen concentration (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.96-1.04, p = 0.84) or CYP polymorphisms. CONCLUSION Serum concentrations of tamoxifen and its demethylated metabolites are higher in older patients, independent of CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 gene polymorphisms. A higher bioavailability of tamoxifen in older patients may explain the observed differences. However, clinical relevance of these findings is limited and should not lead to a different tamoxifen dose in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E T D Souwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - A Sanchez-Spitman
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D J A R Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H J Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T van Gelder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sanchez-Spitman A, Guchelaar HJ. Personalizing tamoxifen therapy in adjuvant therapy: a brief summary of the ongoing discussion. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2023; 16:93-95. [PMID: 36461813 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2154652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anabel Sanchez-Spitman
- Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Groenland SL, van Eerden RAG, Westerdijk K, Meertens M, Koolen SLW, Moes DJAR, de Vries N, Rosing H, Otten H, Vulink AJE, Desar IME, Imholz ALT, Gelderblom H, van Erp NP, Beijnen JH, Mathijssen RHJ, Huitema ADR, Steeghs N. Therapeutic drug monitoring-based precision dosing of oral targeted therapies in oncology: a prospective multicenter study. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1071-1082. [PMID: 35777707 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral targeted therapies show a high pharmacokinetic (PK) interpatient variability. Even though exposure has been positively correlated with efficacy for many of these drugs, these are still dosed using a one-size-fits-all approach. Consequently, individuals have a high probability to be either underexposed or overexposed, potentially leading to suboptimal outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring, which is personalized dosing based on measured systemic drug concentrations, could address these problems. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study (www.trialregister.nl; NL6695) if they started treatment with one of the 24 participating oral targeted therapies. Primary outcome was to halve the proportion of underexposed patients, compared with historical data. PK sampling was carried out after 4, 8 and 12 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. In case of Cmin below the predefined target and manageable toxicity, a pharmacokinetically guided intervention was proposed (i.e. checking compliance and drug-drug interactions, concomitant intake with food, splitting intake moments or dose increments). RESULTS In total, 600 patients were included of whom 426 patients are assessable for the primary outcome and 552 patients had ≥1 PK sample(s) available and were therefore assessable for the overall analyses. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing reduced the proportion of underexposed patients at the third PK measurement by 39.0% (95% confidence interval 28.0% to 49.0%) compared with historical data. At the third PK measurement, 110 out of 426 patients (25.8%) had a low exposure. In total, 294 patients (53.3%) had ≥1 PK sample(s) below the preset target at a certain time point during treatment. In 166 of these patients (56.5%), pharmacokinetically guided interventions were carried out, which were successful in 113 out of 152 assessable patients (74.3%). CONCLUSIONS Pharmacokinetically guided dose optimization of oral targeted therapies was feasible in clinical practice and reduced the proportion of underexposed patients considerably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S L Groenland
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - R A G van Eerden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Westerdijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M Meertens
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D J A R Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - N de Vries
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Rosing
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Otten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - A J E Vulink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - I M E Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A L T Imholz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - N P van Erp
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A D R Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmacology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - N Steeghs
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheng YY, Zheng T, Chang MW, Dalley JW, Chen YJ, Tsai TH, Hsieh CH. Impact of Irradiation on the Pharmacokinetics and Biotransformation of Tamoxifen. Front Oncol 2022; 12:833108. [PMID: 35252004 PMCID: PMC8891439 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe optimal procedure for combining radiotherapy (RT) with tamoxifen treatment is controversial as RT may alter the pharmacokinetics and biotransformation of tamoxifen. The present study investigated this potential interaction by assessing the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen during concurrent and sequential RT.MethodPlasma tamoxifen concentration was measured in rats with or without RT 2.0 Gy (RT2.0Gy) or 0.5 Gy (RT0.5Gy) with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry after tamoxifen administration (10 mg/kg, p.o., n = 6). Tamoxifen was either administered 1 h after RT (concurrent condition) or 24 h after RT (sequential condition).ResultsPharmacokinetic data analysis demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) and half-life of tamoxifen were 2,004 ± 241 h ng/ml and 6.23 ± 1.21 h, respectively, after tamoxifen administration (10 mg/kg, p.o.). The respective conversion rate of 4-hydroxytamoxifen, N-desmethytamoxifen, and endoxifen for tamoxifen metabolism was 20%, 16%, and 5%. The AUC value of tamoxifen in the RT0.5Gy group was 1.5- to 1.7-fold higher than in the sham and RT2.0Gy groups. The relative bioavailability of tamoxifen at concurrent RT0.5Gy and RT2.0Gy groups ranged from 127% to 202% and from 71% to 152%, respectively. The magnitude of endoxifen, which converted from 4-hydroxytamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen, increased 3- to 5-fold in the concurrent RT groups. By contrast, the AUC of tamoxifen decreased by roughly 24% in the sequential RT2.0Gy group. The conversion ratio of endoxifen was four times higher than that in the sequential RT2.0Gy group compared with rats not exposed to RT.ConclusionThe current study provides advanced pharmacokinetic data to confirm the interaction between RT and hormone therapy. Our findings indicate that RT facilitates the metabolism of tamoxifen to active metabolites and thus imply that combination RT-tamoxifen has potential benefits for the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung-Yi Cheng
- Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Teresa Zheng
- Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Michael W. Chang
- Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Jeffrey W. Dalley
- Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yu-Jen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Artificial Intelligence and Medical Application, MacKay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, MacKay Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Yu-Jen Chen, ; Tung-Hu Tsai, ; Chen-Hsi Hsieh, ;
| | - Tung-Hu Tsai
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Yu-Jen Chen, ; Tung-Hu Tsai, ; Chen-Hsi Hsieh, ;
| | - Chen-Hsi Hsieh
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Yu-Jen Chen, ; Tung-Hu Tsai, ; Chen-Hsi Hsieh, ;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Braal CL, Kleijburg A, Jager A, Koolen SLW, Mathijssen RHJ, Corro Ramos I, Wetzelaer P, Uyl-de Groot CA. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring-Guided Adjuvant Tamoxifen Dosing in Patients with Early Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the Prospective TOTAM Trial. Clin Drug Investig 2022; 42:163-175. [PMID: 35020170 PMCID: PMC8844136 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-021-01114-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Endoxifen is the active metabolite of tamoxifen, and a minimal plasma concentration of 16 nM has been suggested as a threshold above which it is effective in reducing the risk of breast cancer recurrence. The aim of the current analysis was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided tamoxifen dosing. Methods A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from a Dutch healthcare perspective, using a partitioned survival model and a lifetime horizon. The reduction in subtherapeutic treatment following TDM is modelled as improved rates of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in comparison to standard tamoxifen treatment. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and a series of scenario analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. Results Base-case results estimated a total increase in life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for TDM of 0.40 and 0.53, respectively. Total costs for TDM and standard tamoxifen treatment are €32,893 and €39,524, respectively. The TDM intervention results in both more QALYs and less healthcare costs, indicating a dominating effect for TDM. The PSA results indicate that the probability of TDM being cost-effective is 92% when using a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000. Conclusions TDM-guided dose optimization of tamoxifen is estimated to save costs and increase QALYs for early breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Louwrens Braal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Anne Kleijburg
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Centre of Economic Evaluation and Machine Learning, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isaac Corro Ramos
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Wetzelaer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carin A Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Groenland SL, Verheijen RB, Joerger M, Mathijssen RH, Sparreboom A, Beijnen JH, Beumer JH, Steeghs N, Huitema AD. Precision Dosing of Targeted Therapies Is Ready for Prime Time. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:6644-6652. [PMID: 34548319 PMCID: PMC8934568 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Fixed dosing of oral targeted therapies is inadequate in the era of precision medicine. Personalized dosing, based on pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure, known as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), is rational and supported by increasing evidence. The purpose of this perspective is to discuss whether randomized studies are needed to confirm the clinical value of precision dosing in oncology. PK-based dose adjustments are routinely made for many drugs and are recommended by health authorities, for example, for patients with renal impairment or for drug-drug interaction management strategies. Personalized dosing simply extrapolates this paradigm from selected patient populations to each individual patient with suboptimal exposure, irrespective of the underlying cause. If it has been demonstrated that exposure is related to a relevant clinical outcome, such as efficacy or toxicity, and that exposure can be optimized by PK-guided dosing, it could be logically assumed that PK-guided dosing would result in better treatment outcomes without the need for randomized confirmatory trials. We propose a path forward to demonstrate the clinical relevance of individualized dosing of molecularly-targeted anticancer drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie L. Groenland
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remy B. Verheijen
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Markus Joerger
- Department of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Ron H.J. Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alex Sparreboom
- Division of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States of America
| | - Jos H. Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H. Beumer
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, United States of America
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alwin D.R. Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands,Corresponding author: , +31(0)20 512 4481, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Helland T, Alsomairy S, Lin C, Søiland H, Mellgren G, Hertz DL. Generating a Precision Endoxifen Prediction Algorithm to Advance Personalized Tamoxifen Treatment in Patients with Breast Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11030201. [PMID: 33805613 PMCID: PMC8000933 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11030201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Tamoxifen is an endocrine treatment for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. The effectiveness of tamoxifen may be compromised in patients with metabolic resistance, who have insufficient metabolic generation of the active metabolites endoxifen and 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen. This has been challenging to validate due to the lack of measured metabolite concentrations in tamoxifen clinical trials. CYP2D6 activity is the primary determinant of endoxifen concentration. Inconclusive results from studies investigating whether CYP2D6 genotype is associated with tamoxifen efficacy may be due to the imprecision in using CYP2D6 genotype as a surrogate of endoxifen concentration without incorporating the influence of other genetic and clinical variables. This review summarizes the evidence that active metabolite concentrations determine tamoxifen efficacy. We then introduce a novel approach to validate this relationship by generating a precision endoxifen prediction algorithm and comprehensively review the factors that must be incorporated into the algorithm, including genetics of CYP2D6 and other pharmacogenes. A precision endoxifen algorithm could be used to validate metabolic resistance in existing tamoxifen clinical trial cohorts and could then be used to select personalized tamoxifen doses to ensure all patients achieve adequate endoxifen concentrations and maximum benefit from tamoxifen treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Helland
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (S.A.); (C.L.); (D.L.H.)
- Hormone Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway;
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +47-92847793
| | - Sarah Alsomairy
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (S.A.); (C.L.); (D.L.H.)
| | - Chenchia Lin
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (S.A.); (C.L.); (D.L.H.)
| | - Håvard Søiland
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway;
| | - Gunnar Mellgren
- Hormone Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway;
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway;
| | - Daniel Louis Hertz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (S.A.); (C.L.); (D.L.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mulder TAM, de With M, del Re M, Danesi R, Mathijssen RHJ, van Schaik RHN. Clinical CYP2D6 Genotyping to Personalize Adjuvant Tamoxifen Treatment in ER-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: Current Status of a Controversy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040771. [PMID: 33673305 PMCID: PMC7917604 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tamoxifen is an important adjuvant endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients. It is mainly catalyzed by the enzyme CYP2D6 into the most active metabolite endoxifen. Genetic variation in the CYP2D6 gene influences endoxifen formation and thereby potentially therapy outcome. However, the association between CYP2D6 genotype and clinical outcome on tamoxifen is still under debate, as contradictory outcomes have been published. This review describes the latest insights in both CYP2D6 genotype and endoxifen concentrations, as well CYP2D6 genotype and clinical outcome, from 2018 to 2020. Abstract Tamoxifen is a major option for adjuvant endocrine treatment in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer patients. The conversion of the prodrug tamoxifen into the most active metabolite endoxifen is mainly catalyzed by the enzyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). Genetic variation in the CYP2D6 gene leads to altered enzyme activity, which influences endoxifen formation and thereby potentially therapy outcome. The association between genetically compromised CYP2D6 activity and low endoxifen plasma concentrations is generally accepted, and it was shown that tamoxifen dose increments in compromised patients resulted in higher endoxifen concentrations. However, the correlation between CYP2D6 genotype and clinical outcome is still under debate. This has led to genotype-based tamoxifen dosing recommendations by the Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) in 2018, whereas in 2019, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) discouraged the use of CYP2D6 genotyping in clinical practice for tamoxifen therapy. This paper describes the latest developments on CYP2D6 genotyping in relation to endoxifen plasma concentrations and tamoxifen-related clinical outcome. Therefore, we focused on Pharmacogenetic publications from 2018 (CPIC publication) to 2021 in order to shed a light on the current status of this debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa A. M. Mulder
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.A.M.M.); (M.d.W.); (M.d.R.); (R.D.)
| | - Mirjam de With
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.A.M.M.); (M.d.W.); (M.d.R.); (R.D.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Marzia del Re
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.A.M.M.); (M.d.W.); (M.d.R.); (R.D.)
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 55, Via Roma, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Romano Danesi
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.A.M.M.); (M.d.W.); (M.d.R.); (R.D.)
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 55, Via Roma, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Ron H. J. Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Ron H. N. van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.A.M.M.); (M.d.W.); (M.d.R.); (R.D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-10-703-3119
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Slanař O, Hronová K, Bartošová O, Šíma M. Recent advances in the personalized treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer with tamoxifen: a focus on pharmacogenomics. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2020; 17:307-321. [PMID: 33320718 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1865310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Tamoxifen is still an important drug in hormone-dependent breast cancer therapy. Personalization of its clinical use beyond hormone receptor positivity could improve the substantial variability of the treatment response.Areas covered: The overview of the current evidence for the treatment personalization using therapeutic drug monitoring, or using genetic biomarkers including CYP2D6 is provided. Although many studies focused on the PK aspects or the impact of CYP2D6 variability the translation into clinical routine is not clearly defined due to the inconsistent clinical outcome data.Expert opinion: We believe that at least the main candidate factors, i.e. CYP2D6 polymorphism, CYP2D6 inhibition, endoxifen serum levels may become important predictors of clinical relevance for tamoxifen treatment personalization in the future. To achieve this aim, however, further research should take into consideration more precise characterization of the disease, epigenetic factors and also utilize an appropriately powered multifactorial approach instead of a single gene evaluating studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondřej Slanař
- Department of Pharmacology, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Karolína Hronová
- Department of Pharmacology, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Olga Bartošová
- Department of Pharmacology, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Šíma
- Department of Pharmacology, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Puszkiel A, Arellano C, Vachoux C, Evrard A, Le Morvan V, Boyer JC, Robert J, Delmas C, Dalenc F, Debled M, Venat-Bouvet L, Jacot W, Dohollou N, Bernard-Marty C, Laharie-Mineur H, Filleron T, Roché H, Chatelut E, Thomas F, White-Koning M. Model-Based Quantification of Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms and Co-Medications on Pharmacokinetics of Tamoxifen and Six Metabolites in Breast Cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 109:1244-1255. [PMID: 33047329 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Variations in clinical response to tamoxifen (TAM) may be related to polymorphic cytochromes P450 (CYPs) involved in forming its active metabolite endoxifen (ENDO). We developed a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model for tamoxifen and six metabolites to determine clinically relevant factors of ENDO exposure. Concentration-time data for TAM and 6 metabolites come from a prospective, multicenter, 3-year follow-up study of adjuvant TAM (20 mg/day) in patients with breast cancer, with plasma samples drawn every 6 months, and genotypes for 63 genetic polymorphisms (PHACS study, NCT01127295). Concentration data for TAM and 6 metabolites from 928 patients (n = 27,433 concentrations) were analyzed simultaneously with a 7-compartment PopPK model. CYP2D6 phenotype (poor metabolizer (PM), intermediate metabolizer (IM), normal metabolizer (NM), and ultra-rapid metabolizer (UM)), CYP3A4*22, CYP2C19*2, and CYP2B6*6 genotypes, concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitors, age, and body weight had a significant impact on TAM metabolism. Formation of ENDO from N-desmethyltamoxifen was decreased by 84% (relative standard error (RSE) = 14%) in PM patients and by 47% (RSE = 9%) in IM patients and increased in UM patients by 27% (RSE = 12%) compared with NM patients. Dose-adjustment simulations support an increase from 20 mg/day to 40 and 80 mg/day in IM patients and PM patients, respectively, to reach ENDO levels similar to those in NM patients. However, when considering Antiestrogenic Activity Score (AAS), a dose increase to 60 mg/day in PM patients seems sufficient. This PopPK model can be used as a tool to predict ENDO levels or AAS according to the patient's CYP2D6 phenotype for TAM dose adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicja Puszkiel
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Cécile Arellano
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Christelle Vachoux
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Alexandre Evrard
- Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes-Carémeau, Nîmes, France.,IRCM, Inserm, Université de Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France
| | - Valérie Le Morvan
- Inserm U1218, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Boyer
- Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes-Carémeau, Nîmes, France
| | - Jacques Robert
- Inserm U1218, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Caroline Delmas
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - William Jacot
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Filleron
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Henri Roché
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Etienne Chatelut
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Fabienne Thomas
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Melanie White-Koning
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|