1
|
Salaün H, Djerroudi L, Haik L, Schnitzler A, Bataillon G, Deniziaut G, Bièche I, Vincent‐Salomon A, Debled M, Cottu P. The prognosis of patients treated with everolimus for advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer is driven by molecular features. J Pathol Clin Res 2024; 10:e12372. [PMID: 38563252 PMCID: PMC10985771 DOI: 10.1002/2056-4538.12372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Everolimus is widely used in patients with advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. We looked at alterations in the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway in a multicenter cohort as potential biomarkers of efficacy. Patients with advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer treated with everolimus and endocrine therapy between 2012 and 2014 in two cancer centers were included. Targeted sequencing examined mutations in PIK3CA, ESR1, and AKT1 genes. An immunochemical analysis was conducted to evaluate expression of PTEN, INPP4B, STK11, p4EBP1, and pS6. We analyzed 71 patients (44 primary tumors; 27 metastatic tissues). Median age was 63 years [58-69]. All patients had heavily pretreated advanced disease. A mutation in the PIK3CA pathway was observed in 32 samples (PIK3CA exons 10 and 21 and AKT1 exon 4 in 15.5%, 24.0%, and 5.6% of samples), and in ESR1 in 5 samples (7.0%), respectively. Most samples showed cytoplasmic expression of the PIK3CA pathway proteins. Progression-free survival was longer in patients with a pS6 or p4EBP1 histoscore ≥ median value (6.6 versus 3.7 months, p = 0.037), and in patients with a PTEN histoscore ≤ median value (7.1 versus 5.3 months, p = 0.02). Overall survival was longer in patients with pS6 ≥ 3rd quartile (27.6 versus 19.3 months, p = 0.038) and in patients with any mutation in the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway (27.6 versus 19.3 months, p = 0.011). The prognosis of patients treated with everolimus for advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer appears primarily driven by molecular features associated with the activation of the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Salaün
- Department of Medical OncologyInstitut CurieParisFrance
| | - Lounes Djerroudi
- Department of Pathology‐Genetics‐ImmunologyInstitut CurieParisFrance
| | - Laura Haik
- Department of Medical OncologyInstitut BergoniéBordeauxFrance
| | - Anne Schnitzler
- Department of Pathology‐Genetics‐ImmunologyInstitut CurieParisFrance
| | - Guillaume Bataillon
- Department of Pathology‐Genetics‐ImmunologyInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Present address:
Department of PathologyIUCT OncopoleToulouseFrance
| | - Gabrielle Deniziaut
- Department of Pathology‐Genetics‐ImmunologyInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Present address:
Department of PathologyCHU Pitié‐SalpêtrièreParisFrance
| | - Ivan Bièche
- Department of Pathology‐Genetics‐ImmunologyInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Paris‐Cité UniversityParisFrance
| | - Anne Vincent‐Salomon
- Department of Pathology‐Genetics‐ImmunologyInstitut CurieParisFrance
- PSL Research UniversityParisFrance
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical OncologyInstitut BergoniéBordeauxFrance
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical OncologyInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Paris‐Cité UniversityParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Penault-Llorca F, Dalenc F, Chabaud S, Cottu P, Allouache D, Cameron D, Grenier J, Venat Bouvet L, Jegannathen A, Campone M, Debled M, Hardy-Bessard AC, Giacchetti S, Barthelemy P, Kaluzinski L, Mailliez A, Mouret-Reynier MA, Legouffe E, Cayre A, Martinez M, Delbaldo C, Mollon-Grange D, Macaskill EJ, Sephton M, Stefani L, Belgadi B, Winter M, Orfeuvre H, Lacroix-Triki M, Bonnefoi H, Bliss J, Canon JL, Lemonnier J, Andre F, Bachelot T. Prognostic value of EndoPredict test in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary breast cancer screened for the randomized, double-blind, phase III UNIRAD trial. ESMO Open 2024; 9:103443. [PMID: 38692082 PMCID: PMC11070798 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the multigene EndoPredict test in prospectively collected data of patients screened for the randomized, double-blind, phase III UNIRAD trial, which evaluated the addition of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy in high-risk, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were classified into low or high risk according to the EPclin score, consisting of a 12-gene molecular score combined with tumor size and nodal status. Association of the EPclin score with disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The independent prognostic added value of EPclin score was tested in a multivariate Cox model after adjusting on tumor characteristics. RESULTS EndoPredict test results were available for 768 patients: 663 patients classified as EPclin high risk (EPCH) and 105 patients as EPclin low risk (EPCL). Median follow-up was 70 months (range 1-172 months). For the 429 EPCH randomized patients, there was no significant difference in DFS between treatment arms. The 60-month relapse rate for patients in the EPCL and EPCH groups was 0% and 7%, respectively. Hazard ratio (HR) supposing continuous EPclin score was 1.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-2.5, P < 0.0001]. This prognostic effect remained significant when assessed in a Cox model adjusting on tumor size, number of positive nodes and tumor grade (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.13, P = 0.0141). The 60-month DMFS for patients in the EPCL and EPCH groups was 100% and 94%, respectively (adjusted HR 8.10, 95% CI 1.1-59.1, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The results confirm the value of EPclin score as an independent prognostic parameter in node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer patients receiving standard adjuvant treatment. EPclin score can be used to identify patients at higher risk of recurrence who may warrant additional systemic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Penault-Llorca
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Jean Perrin, Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR 1240 INSERM-UCA, Clermont Ferrand.
| | - F Dalenc
- Oncopole Claudius Regaud, IUCT, Toulouse
| | | | | | | | - D Cameron
- Western General Hospital, Edinburg, UK
| | | | | | | | - M Campone
- Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain & Angers
| | | | | | | | - P Barthelemy
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg
| | - L Kaluzinski
- Centre Hospitalier Cotentin, Cherbourg en Cotentin
| | | | - M-A Mouret-Reynier
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Jean Perrin, Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR 1240 INSERM-UCA, Clermont Ferrand
| | | | - A Cayre
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Jean Perrin, Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR 1240 INSERM-UCA, Clermont Ferrand
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - B Belgadi
- Centre Hospitalier Montélimar, Montélimar, France
| | - M Winter
- Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - H Orfeuvre
- Centre Hospitalier Fleyriat, Bourg-en-Bresse
| | | | | | - J Bliss
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J-L Canon
- Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | | | - F Andre
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rhanine Y, Bonnefoi H, Goncalves A, Debled M, Le Moulec S, Bonichon N, Macgrogan G, Arnedos M, Dubroca-Dehez B, Grellety T. Efficacy of antiandrogens in androgen receptor-positive triple-negative metastatic breast cancer: Real-life data. Breast 2024; 73:103667. [PMID: 38160476 PMCID: PMC10792951 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Antiandrogens (AA) have been tested in clinical trials in androgen receptor (AR) + triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We aim to assess the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of AA in real life. The primary end-point was CBR at 6 months. Twenty-four patients were assessable and received: abiraterone acetate (62 %), enzalutamide (8 %) and bicalutamide (30 %). CBR at 6 months was 29 % (7/24) with 2 CR, 3 PR and 2 SD. Four patients had a clinical benefit >12 months. Real-life efficacy of AA use in metastatic AR + TNBC are in line with data from published trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmine Rhanine
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Hervé Bonnefoi
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié and Université de Bordeaux, UFR Sciences Médicales, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | - Monica Arnedos
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Thomas Grellety
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque, Bayonne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frenel JS, Lusque A, Delaloge S, Ferrero JM, Bachelot T, Desmoulins I, Levy C, Eymard JC, Gonçalves A, Patsouris A, Reynier MAM, Thery MJC, Petit T, Cabel L, Uwer L, Debled M, Chevrot M, Mailliez A, Jacot W, de La Motte Rouge T. Efficacy of front-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:2072-2080. [PMID: 37012318 PMCID: PMC10205708 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02248-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficacy of endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer could differ depending on the presence of BRCA1/2 germline mutation. METHODS The ESME metastatic breast cancer platform (NCT03275311) is a French real world database. Multivariable models including a time-varying approach and landmark analyses assessed the association between time-dependent gBRCA status (categorised as gBRCAm, gBRCAwt (wild type), and untested), overall survival (OS), and first-line progression-free survival (PFS1). RESULTS A total of 170 patients were gBRCAm carriers, 676 gBRCAwt, and 12,930 were untested at baseline. In the multivariable analysis, gBRCAm carriers overall had a lower OS compared to gBRCAwt (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.26 [1.03-1.55]). gBRCAm patients treated with front-line endocrine therapy had lower adjusted OS (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 1.54 [1.03-2.32]) and PFS1 (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.58 [1.17-2.12]) compared to gBRCAwt patients. However, for patients who received frontline chemotherapy, neither OS nor PFS1 differed between gBRCAm carriers and the other groups (HR versus gBRCAwt for OS: 1.12 [0.88-1.41], p = 0.350; PFS1: 1.09 [0.90-1.31], p = 0.379). CONCLUSION In this large cohort of HR+/HER2- MBC patients treated in a pre-CDK4/6 inhibitors era, gBRCAm status was associated with a lower OS and lower PFS following first-line endocrine therapy, but not following first-line chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-S Frenel
- Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.
| | - A Lusque
- Biostatistics & Health Data Science Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - S Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - J-M Ferrero
- Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - T Bachelot
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - I Desmoulins
- Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc (Dijon), Dijon, France
| | - C Levy
- Medical Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - J-C Eymard
- Medical Oncology, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France
| | - A Gonçalves
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A Patsouris
- Medical Oncology Department, ICO - Institut de cancerologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | | | - M J-C Thery
- Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - T Petit
- Bas-Rhin, Centre Paul Strauss Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer, Strasbourg, France
| | - L Cabel
- Medical Oncology, Hôpital René Huguenin - Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - L Uwer
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | - M Debled
- Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Chevrot
- Department of Real World Data, UNICANCER, Paris, France
| | - A Mailliez
- Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - W Jacot
- Medical Oncology Department, ICM Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rassy E, Filleron T, Viansone A, Lacroix-Triki M, Rivera S, Desmoulins I, Serin D, Canon JL, Campone M, Gonçalves A, Levy C, Cottu P, Petit T, Eymard JC, Debled M, Bachelot T, Dalenc F, Roca L, Lemonnier J, Delaloge S, Pistilli B. Pattern and risk factors of isolated local relapse among women with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer and lymph node involvement: 10-year follow-up analysis of the PACS 01 and PACS 04 trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 199:371-379. [PMID: 36988749 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06912-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to determine the pattern of isolated local recurrences (ILR) in women with stage II-III hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 breast cancer (HR + /HER2-BC) after 10-year follow-up. METHODS UNICANCER-PACS 01 and PACS 04 trials included 5,008 women with T1-T3 and N1-N3 to evaluate the efficacy of different anthracycline ± taxanes-containing regimens after modified mastectomy or lumpectomy plus axillary lymph node dissection. We analyzed the data from 2,932 women with HR + /HER2- BC to evaluate the cumulative incidence of ILR and describe the factors associated with ILR. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 9.1 years (95% CI 9.0-9.2 years), the cumulative incidence of ILR increased steadily between 1 and 10 years from 0.2% to 2.5%. The multivariable analysis showed that older age (subhazard ratios [sHR] = 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.99) and mastectomy (sHR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.86) were associated with lower risk of ILR, and no adjuvant endocrine therapy (sHR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.32 7-5.67) with increased risk of ILR. CONCLUSION In this population of high-risk patients with localized HR + /HER2- BC, the risk of ILR was low but remained constant over 10 years. Younger age at diagnosis, breast-conserving surgery, and adjuvant endocrine therapy were independent risk factors of ILR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie Rassy
- Department of Cancer Medicine, University of Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Thomas Filleron
- BiostatisticsDepartment, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Alessandro Viansone
- Department of Cancer Medicine, University of Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Magali Lacroix-Triki
- Department of Biopathology, University of Paris Saclay, Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Sofia Rivera
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Daniel Serin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - Jean Luc Canon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Mario Campone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Site René Gauducheau, Site Hospitalier Nord, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Lise Roca
- Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Parc Euromédecine, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, University of Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- Department of Cancer Medicine, University of Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pierga JY, Billa O, Dabakuyo S, Lemonnier J, Berger F, Trédan O, Jacot W, Gonçalves A, Debled M, Levy C, Jouannaud C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Ferrero JM, Dalenc F, Toumi FZ, Bonnetain F, Bidard FC, Renault S. Abstract P4-07-24: Circulating tumor cells enumeration and Health Related Quality of Life of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p4-07-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) counts have a strong prognostic impact on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Changes 4 weeks after the start of a new line of therapy, inform on treatment efficacy. Despite improvements in systemic treatment, metastatic BC remains mainly uncurable with alteration of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during the course of the disease. The aim of this work was to assess impact of clinical factors and biological factors as CTC on HRQOL. Methods: The French cohort COMET is a prospective study including first line HER2 negative patients receiving weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab according to EMA approved combination. The aim of this cohort was to evaluate clinical, biological and radiological parameters associated with patients’ outcome (CTC, CEC, serum markers, ctDNA, pharmacogenomic polymorphisms, metabolomic parameters, visceral fat assessed by initial CTscan, serum estradiol level, and quality of life). HRQOL was assessed at baseline, at every cycle until progression and then every 3 months up to death using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and its breast cancer specific module, the EORTC QLQ-BR23. Five dimensions of HRQOL were analyzed for the primary analyses: Global health status (GHS), physical functioning (PF), Emotional functioning (EF), fatigue (FA) and pain (PA). Time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in HRQOL was defined as the interval between inclusion and the first decrease in HRQOL score ≥ 5 compared to baseline HRQOL score with no further improvement or in case of death. CTC counts were determined using the standard CellSearch system [Menarini Silicon Biosystems]. Results: Out of 510 patients included in COMET study, 432 patients with available HRQOL data were analyzed in this study. At baseline, patients reported a mean score for GHS of 57.6 (SD=22.7), for PF of 75.8 (23.2), for EF of 62.2 (25.8), for FA of 42.2 (29.60) and for PA of 38.1 (31.5). The Median TUDDs for the 5 targeted dimensions was 10.1 months [7.5-16.9] for GHS, 6.1 months [4.1-8.9] for PF, 21.6 [18.7-31.2] for EF, 10.8 [6.2-16.6] for FA and 13.6[10.1-22.5] months for PA. CTC counts were available in 261 patients at base line and in 229 patients after 4 weeks of treatment, before second cycle of chemotherapy. CTC high count was independent of main clinical and biological characteristics except lobular subtype. We confirmed the poor outcome of patients with high CTC count at base line and after one cycle of treatment with the threshold of > 4CTC/7.5 ml of blood. Out of the 5 dimensions of HRQOL, TUDD of EF was significantly correlated with a high CTC level at base line (p=0.0262) and even more with still an elevated count of CTC after one cycle of chemotherapy(p=0.0137). There was no association of CTC with the other dimensions of HRQOL. Conclusion: This is the first study ever reporting an analysis of QoL and CTC. We observed an association of high CTC count with one component of HRQOL scale. This suggests that CTC could be complementary to clinical factors that could influence HRQOL in HER2 negative metastatic BC treated with first line chemotherapy.
Citation Format: Jean-Yves Pierga, Oumar Billa, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Jérôme Lemonnier, Frédérique Berger, Olivier Trédan, William Jacot, Anthony Gonçalves, Marc Debled, Christelle Levy, Christelle Jouannaud, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Florence Dalenc, Fatima-Zohra Toumi, Franck Bonnetain, Francois-Clement Bidard, Shufang Renault. Circulating tumor cells enumeration and Health Related Quality of Life of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-24.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oumar Billa
- 2Centre George Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | - Olivier Trédan
- 6Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - William Jacot
- 7Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Franck Bonnetain
- 16Centre de Recherche Lipides-Nutrition-Cancer, Besançon, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Billa O, Dabakuyo S, Chevrier M, Bonnetain F, Desmoulins I, Jacot W, Trédan O, Debled M, Levy C, Gonçalves A, Ferrero JM, Dalenc F, Jouannaud C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Mousseau M, Grenier J, Jacquin JP, Toumi FZ, Berger F, Lemonnier J, Pierga JY. Abstract P4-07-54: Health related quality of life of patients treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: impact of clinical factors. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p4-07-54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Advances in screening and treatment have led to increase in breast cancer (BC) survival in recent years but prognoses for metastatic BC remain poor with poorer outcomes as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Treatment as bevacizumab and paclitaxel for metastatic BC, although that can increase time to progression of disease, often carry toxicity and is not curative but rather palliative in intent with the goal to improve or maintain HRQOL. The aim of this work was to assess impact of clinical factors such as disease progression, toxicity on HRQOL. Methods: COMET study is a multicenter prospective single-arm cohort study in France whose main objective was to identify biological factor that could predict the clinical benefit of bevacizumab-paclitaxel combination therapy as first treatment in HER2 negative metastatic BC. HRQOL was assessed at baseline, at every cycle (every for 4 weeks) until progression and then every 3 months up to death using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and its BC specific module, the EORTC QLQ-BR23. In this ancillary study, we targeted 5 dimensions HRQOL for the primary analyses: Global health status (GHS), physical functioning (PF), Emotional functioning (EF), fatigue (FA) and pain (PA). The primary endpoint was time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in HRQOL scales that defined as time between inclusion and the first decrease HRQOL score ≥ 5 points compared to baseline score, with no further improvement of at least 5 points. Multivariable Cox model with time dependent covariate was performed to assess clinical factors associated with TUDD for each of the 5 target dimensions HRQOL. We performed 3 models for each dimension: model 1 including all covariate with p< 0.10 in univariable; model 2 including model 1 and adjusted on cancer subtype and model 3 included model 1 stratified by cancer subtype. P value < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 510 patients included in COMET study, 432 patients with available HRQOL data were analyzed in this study. Median age at inclusion was 58 years (range: 29-83), and 24.4% of patients had triple negative tumor subtype. About 79 % of cancers were invasive ductal carcinoma and 43 % patients had least 3 metastasis sites at baseline. At baseline, patients reported a mean score for GHS of 57.6 (SD=22.7), for PF of 75.8 (23.2), for EF of 62.2 (25.8), for FA of 42.2 (29.60) and for PA of 38.1 (31.5). The Median TUDDs for the 5 targeted dimensions was 10.1 months [7.5-16.9] for GHS, 6.1 months [4.1-8.9] for PF, 21.6 [18.7-31.2] for EF, 10.8 [6.2-16.6] for FA and 13.6[10.1-22.5] months for PA. In multivariable analyses, Disease Progression was associated with TUDD of GHS (HR [99%CI] =2.4 [1.2-4.9] and TUDD of PF (2.1 [1.1-3.7]). After adjusted on cancer subtype, association persisted with TUDD of GHS (p=0.009). Performance Status was associated with TUDD of PF (1.6 [1.2-2.3]), and TUDD of Pain (1.6 [1.1-2.3]). Performance Status association with TUDD of PF continued after adjustment on cancer subtype (p=0.0003). Prior endocrine therapy was associated with TUDD of pain in patients with tumor with positive hormone receptor (HR+) (2.4 [1.2-4.7]). There was no factor associated with TUDD of EF and TUDD of FA. Conclusion: Results of this study have shown that among the 5 targeted dimensions HRQOL, Physical Functioning was deteriorated in the shortest time. Disease progression, base line performance status and prior endocrine therapy for HR+ subtype, are clinical factors that could influence HRQOL in HER2 negative metastatic BC treated with first line chemotherapy.
Citation Format: Oumar Billa, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Marion Chevrier, Franck Bonnetain, Isabelle Desmoulins, William Jacot, Olivier Trédan, Marc Debled, Christelle Levy, Anthony Gonçalves, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Florence Dalenc, Christelle Jouannaud, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Mireille Mousseau, Julien Grenier, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Fatima-Zohra Toumi, Frédérique Berger, Jérôme Lemonnier, Jean-Yves Pierga. Health related quality of life of patients treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: impact of clinical factors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-54.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oumar Billa
- 1Centre George Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | | | - William Jacot
- 6Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, France
| | - Olivier Trédan
- 7Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Julien Grenier
- 16Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, Provence-Alpes-Cote d’Azur, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guiu S, Guiu B, Chevrier M, Billa O, Levy C, Trédan O, Desmoulins I, Debled M, Ferrero JM, Jouannaud C, Gonçalves A, Rios M, Mouret-Reynier MA, Berger F, TOUMI FZ, Lemonnier J, Pierga JY, Dabakuyo S, Gourgou S. Abstract P1-03-04: Visceral fat area as a predictive factor in metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p1-03-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Obesity has previously been correlated with poorer survival in both early and metastatic breast cancer. Adipose tissues release proangiogenic factors such as Insulin-like Growth Factor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor that may ultimately promote tumor growth. CTscan can be used to measure the visceral fat area (VFA) and the subcutaneous fat area (SFA) on the same section. High VFA has been shown to independently predict poorer outcome in patients given first-line bevacizumab-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The prospective multicenter COMET trial included metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab and paclitaxel as fist-line chemotherapy. This study was designed to identify and validate reliable factors to predict benefit of bevacizumab and allow for a more personalized use of this antiangiogenic agent. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of BMI (Body Mass Index), VFA and SFA in the COMET cohort and their impact on the quality of life. Patients and Methods Out of the 510 patients included in the COMET trial from 9/2012 to 3/2016, 480 received bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment and 360 had available CTscan data. VFA and SFA were measured retrospectively on the CTscans performed before chemotherapy initiation, at the level of the umbilicus with the patient in the supine position. ImageJ software was used to measure pixels with densities in the -190 HU to -30 HU range in order to delineate the subcutaneous and visceral compartments and to compute the cross-sectional area of each in cm2. These measurements were performed by a radiologist blinded to patients’ characteristics and outcomes. For VFA and SFA, we used a threshold at the median value. VFA and SFA levels were tested for their association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The impact on quality of life was based on the Global Health Status, the Physical functioning, the Emotional functioning, Fatigue and Pain scores. Results The mean age at inclusion was 57 years (range: 28-83). At initial diagnosis, the main histological type was invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 247, 80.7%). Most patients had received prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 245, 68.1%) and a large majority (95.4%) had less than 3 metastatic sites. One hundred and forty patients (46.7%) had histological grade II and 41% had grade III tumors. The majority of the patients had positive hormone receptor tumor (n = 238, 79.3 %) and 62 (20.7%) had triple-negative tumor subtype. The median BMI was 24.7 (range : 17-46). After a median follow-up of 60.6 months (95%CI, 60-61.3), median PFS was 9.5 months (95CI, 8.6-10.3). There was no significant correlation between BMI (p = 0.69), VFA (p = 0.24) or SFA (p = 0.58) and PFS in the univariate analysis. The median OS was 29.6 months (95CI, 25.9-32.4). BMI, VFA and SFA were not correlated with OS. Out of the 360 patients, 328 had available data regarding the quality of life. There was no impact of the VFA or the SFA on the different quality of life scores. Conclusions In our prospective cohort of 360 patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment, high VFA or high SFA were not associated with a poorer survival. VFA and SFA had no impact on quality of life.
Citation Format: Séverine Guiu, Boris Guiu, Marion Chevrier, Oumar Billa, Christelle Levy, Olivier Trédan, Isabelle Desmoulins, Marc Debled, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Christelle Jouannaud, Anthony Gonçalves, Maria Rios, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Frédérique Berger, Fatima-Zohra TOUMI, Jérôme Lemonnier, Jean-Yves Pierga, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Sophie Gourgou. Visceral fat area as a predictive factor in metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Séverine Guiu
- 1Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM) Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Oumar Billa
- 4Centre George Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Olivier Trédan
- 6Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Maria Rios
- 12INSTITUT DE CANCEROLGIE DE LORRAINE - ALEXIS VAUTRIN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sophie Gourgou
- 19Institut régional du Cancer, Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mailliez A, D'Hondt V, Lusque A, Caron O, Cabel L, Goncalves A, Debled M, Gladieff L, Ferrero JM, Petit T, Mouret-Reynier MA, Eymard JC, Levy C, Uwer L, Leheurteur M, Desmoulins I, Bachelot T, Frenel JS, de la Motte Rouge T, Simon G, Jacot W, Delaloge S. Survival outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients by germline BRCA1/2 status in a large multicenter real-world database. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:921-931. [PMID: 36161271 PMCID: PMC10092337 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The outcomes and best treatment strategies for germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) carriers with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remain uncertain. We compared the overall survival and the first line progression free survival (PFS1) of patients with a gBRCAm identified at initiation of first-line treatment with those of BRCA wild-type (WT) and not-tested (NT) individuals in the ESME real-world database of MBC patients between 2008 and 2016 (NCT03275311). Among the 20 624 eligible patients, 325 had a gBRCAm, 1138 were WT and 19 161 NT. Compared with WT, gBRCAm carriers were younger, and had more aggressive diseases. At a median follow-up of 50.5 months, median OS was 30.6 (95%CI: 21.9-34.3), 35.8 (95%CI: 32.2-37.8) and 39.3 months (95% CI: 38.3-40.3) in the gBRCAm, WT and NT subgroups, respectively. Median PFS1 was 7.9 (95%CI: 6.6-9.3), 7.8 (95%CI: 7.3-8.5) and 9.7 months (95%CI, 9.5-10.0). In the multivariable analysis conducted in the whole cohort, gBRCAm status had however no independent prognostic impact on OS and PFS1. Though, in the triple-negative subgroup, gBRCAm patients had better OS and PFS1 (HR vs WT = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.60-0.97; P = .027 and 0.69; 95% CI: 0.55-0.86; P = .001, respectively). In contrast, in patients with HR+/HER2 negative cancers, PFS1 appeared significantly and OS non significantly lower for gBRCAm carriers (PFS1: HR vs WT = 1.23; 95%CI: 1.03-1.46; P = .024; OS:HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.97-1.52, P = .089). In conclusion, gBRCA1/2 status appears to have divergent survival effects in MBC according to IHC subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Veronique D'Hondt
- Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Amelie Lusque
- Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Luc Cabel
- Institut Curie, Paris et Saint Cloud, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lionel Uwer
- Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - William Jacot
- Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
François-Martin H, Lardy-Cléaud A, Pistilli B, Levy C, Diéras V, Frenel JS, Guiu S, Mouret-Reynier MA, Mailliez A, Eymard JC, Petit T, Ung M, Desmoulins I, Augereau P, Bachelot T, Uwer L, Debled M, Ferrero JM, Clatot F, Goncalves A, Chevrot M, Chabaud S, Cottu P. Long-Term Results with Everolimus in Advanced Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer in a Multicenter National Real-World Observational Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041191. [PMID: 36831532 PMCID: PMC9954606 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Everolimus is the first oral targeted therapy widely used in advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer. We sought to evaluate the impact of everolimus-based therapy on overall survival in the ESME-MBC database, a national metastatic breast cancer cohort that collects retrospective data using clinical trial-like methodology including quality assessments. We compared 1693 patients having received everolimus to 5928 patients not exposed to everolimus in the same period. Overall survival was evaluated according to treatment line, and a propensity score with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method was built to adjust for differences between groups. Crude and landmark overall survival analyses were all compatible with a benefit from everolimus-based therapy. Adjusted hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.34 (95% CI: 0.16-0.72, p = 0.0054), 0.34 (95% CI: 0.22-0.52, p < 0.0001), and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.14-0.36, p < 0.0001) for patients treated with everolimus in line 1, 2, and 3 and beyond, respectively. No clinically relevant benefit on progression-free survival was observed. Causes for everolimus discontinuation were progressive disease (56.2%), adverse events (27.7%), and other miscellaneous reasons. Despite the limitations inherent to such retrospective studies, these results suggest that adding everolimus-based therapy to the therapeutic sequences in patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer may favorably affect overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Barbara Pistilli
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Medical Oncology, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Centre François Baclesse, Department of Medical Oncology, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Véronique Diéras
- Centre Eugène Marquis, Department of Medical Oncology, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Jean-Sébastien Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Séverine Guiu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de la Méditerranée, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | | | - Audrey Mailliez
- Centre Oscar Lambret, Department of Medical Oncology, 59000 Lille, France
| | | | - Thierry Petit
- Centre Paul Strauss, Department of Medical Oncology, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Mony Ung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Centre Georges Francois Leclerc, Department of Medical Oncology, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Paule Augereau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 49055 Angers, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Medical Oncology, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 54519 Nancy, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 06100 Nice, France
| | - Florian Clatot
- Centre Henri Becquerel, Department of Medical Oncology, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | | | - Sylvie Chabaud
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Biostatistics, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-172389434; Fax: +33-153104041
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Carausu M, Carton M, Diéras V, Petit T, Guiu S, Gonçalves A, Augereau P, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Ung M, Desmoulins I, Debled M, Bachelot T, Pistilli B, Frenel JS, Mailliez A, Chevrot M, Cabel L. Association of Endocrine Therapy for HR+/ERBB2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer With Survival Outcomes. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2247154. [PMID: 36520434 PMCID: PMC9856509 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.47154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Evidence suggests that patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (ERBB2+ [formerly HER2+]) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have different clinical characteristics and outcomes according to their hormone receptor (HR) status. The place of endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with HR+/ERBB2+ is still not clearly defined in this setting. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of HR status and first-line inclusion of ET with outcomes among patients with ERBB2+ MBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study was an analysis of clinical data from the French clinical Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) cohort, including patients with MBC who started treatment between 2008 and 2017. The last date of follow-up was June 18, 2020. Data were analyzed from May 2021 to May 2022. EXPOSURES Patients were treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy and either chemotherapy (CT) with or without ET or ET alone. For the study of the association of maintenance ET with outcomes, we included patients treated with first-line ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without maintenance ET. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Median overall survival (OS) and median first-line progression-free survival (PFS) were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models and a propensity score were constructed to report and adjust for prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis included age at MBC, time to MBC, number of metastatic sites, type of metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. RESULTS Among 4145 women with ERBB2+ MBC, 2696 patients had HR+ (median [IQR] age, 58.0 [47.0-67.0] years) and 1449 patients had HR- (56.0 [47.0-64.0] years) tumors. The median OS for patients with HR+ vs HR- tumors was 55.9 months (95% CI, 53.7-59.4 months) vs 42.0 months (95% CI, 38.8-45.2 months), confirmed in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.26-1.56; P < .001). The median PFS for patients with HR+ vs HR- tumors was 12.2 months (95% CI, 11.5-12.9 months) vs 9.8 months (95% CI, 9.2-11.0 months; P = .01), and the HR was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.06-1.26; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, no significant difference was found in OS or PFS for 1520 patients treated with ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT and with or without ET vs 203 patients receiving ERBB2-targeted therapy with ET, regardless of type of ERBB2-targeted therapy (trastuzumab or trastuzumab with pertuzumab). This result was confirmed by matching patients using a propensity score. Using the time-dependent ET variable among patients with ERBB2-targeted therapy with CT, those with maintenance ET had significantly better PFS (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.39-0.57; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These results suggest that ET-containing first-line regimens may be associated with benefits among a subgroup of patients with HR+/ERBB2+ MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Carausu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Matthieu Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Véronique Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss/ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Séverine Guiu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Paule Augereau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Jean Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Mony Ung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Audrey Mailliez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Michaël Chevrot
- Health Data and Partnership Department, Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - Luc Cabel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bachelot T, Cottu P, Chabaud S, Dalenc F, Allouache D, Delaloge S, Jacquin JP, Grenier J, Venat Bouvet L, Jegannathen A, Campone M, Del Piano F, Debled M, Hardy-Bessard AC, Giacchetti S, Mouret-Reynier MA, Barthelemy P, Kaluzinski L, Mailliez A, Legouffe E, Sephton M, Bliss J, Canon JL, Penault-Llorca F, Lemonnier J, Cameron D, Andre F. Everolimus Added to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3699-3708. [PMID: 35605174 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, improves progression-free survival in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in postmenopausal women with aromatase inhibitor-resistant metastatic breast cancer. However, the benefit of adding everolimus to ET in the adjuvant setting in early breast cancer is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized double-blind phase III study, women with high-risk, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary breast cancer were randomly assigned to everolimus or placebo for 2 years combined with standard ET. Stratification factors included ET agent, receipt of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy, progesterone receptor status, duration of ET before random assignment, and lymph node involvement. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01805271). RESULTS Between June 2013 and March 2020, 1,278 patients were randomly allocated to receive everolimus or placebo. At the first interim analysis, the trial was stopped for futility and a full analysis undertaken once data snapshot complete. One hundred forty-seven patients have had a DFS event reported and at 3 years, DFS did not differ between patients who received ET plus everolimus (88% [95% CI, 85 to 91]) or ET plus placebo (89% [95% CI, 86 to 91; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.32; P = .77]). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 22.9% of patients (29.9% with everolimus v 15.9% with placebo, P < .001). 53.4% everolimus-treated patients permanently discontinued experimental treatment early compared with placebo-treated 22.3%. CONCLUSION Among high-risk patients, everolimus added to adjuvant ET did not improve DFS. Tolerability was a concern, with more than half of patients stopping everolimus before study completion. Everolimus cannot be recommended in the adjuvant setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Cottu
- Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Chabaud
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | - Jean-Philippe Jacquin
- Medical Oncology, Institut Cancerologie Lucien Neuwirth, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Julien Grenier
- Medical Oncology, Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France
| | | | | | - Mario Campone
- Medical Oncology, Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | | | - Marc Debled
- Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | - Philippe Barthelemy
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Laure Kaluzinski
- Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Cotentin, Cherbourg en Cotentin, France
| | | | | | - Matthew Sephton
- Medical Oncology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Bliss
- ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jean-Luc Canon
- Medical Oncology, Grand Hopital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | | | | | - David Cameron
- Medical Oncology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vasseur A, Carton M, Guiu S, Augereau P, Uwer L, Mouret-Reynier MA, Levy C, Eymard JC, Ferrero JM, Leheurteur M, Goncalves A, Robert M, De La Motte Rouge T, Bachelot T, Petit T, Debled M, Grinda T, Desmoulins I, Vanlemmens L, Nicolaï V, Simon G, Cabel L. Efficacy of taxanes rechallenge in first-line treatment of early metastatic relapse of patients with HER2-negative breast cancer previously treated with a (neo)adjuvant taxanes regimen: A multicentre retrospective observational study. Breast 2022; 65:136-144. [PMID: 35944353 PMCID: PMC9379666 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Taxanes are one of the most effective chemotherapies (CT) in breast cancer (BC), but the efficacy of taxanes rechallenge in early metastatic relapse has been poorly studied in patients previously treated by taxanes in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Our study aimed to analyse the efficacy of taxane rechallenge in case of early metastatic relapse in a multicentre retrospective observational study compared with other chemotherapies. Methods We analysed the French national ESME metastatic BC (MBC) database and selected HER2- MBC patients who received CT in first-line treatment for a metastatic relapse occurring 3–24 months after previous (neo)adjuvant taxanes treatment. Results Of 23,501 female patients with MBC in ESME, 1057 met the selection criteria. 58.4% received a taxane-based regimen (75.4% concomitant bevacizumab) and 41.6% received other CT. In hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- MBC, multivariate analysis showed no difference in OS between taxanes without bevacizumab compared to other CT (HZR = 1.3 [0.97; 1.74], but taxanes was significantly associated with worse PFS (HZR = 1.48 [1.14; 1.93]). In TNBC, taxanes without bevacizumab and carboplatin/gemcitabine were not superior to other CT for OS (HZR = 1.07 [0.79; 1.44] and HZR = 0.81 [0.58; 1.13], respectively), while for PFS, taxanes was inferior (HZR = 1.33 [1.06–1.67]) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine was superior to other CT (HZR = 0.63 [0.46; 0.87]). For both subtypes, the worse outcome observed with paclitaxel was no longer observed with the addition of bevacizumab. Conclusions With the limitation of retrospective design, taxanes rechallenge in early metastatic relapse of BC may result in a worse PFS in TNBC and HR+/HER2- MBC, which was not observed with the addition of bevacizumab. Patients with HER2-advanced breast cancer (ABC) have often previously received taxanes in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Current guidelines suggest a rechallenge by taxanes in ABC with DFI≥12 months, few data are available for DFI ≤24 months. Taxane rechallenge in early metastatic relapse of BC (DFI ≤24 months) may result in a worse PFS in TNBC and HR+/HER2- ABC. In TNBC, the addition of bevacizumab to taxanes improves PFS and OS for DFI ≤24 months.
Collapse
|
14
|
Blaye C, Darbo É, Debled M, Brouste V, Vélasco V, Pinard C, Larmonier N, Pellegrin I, Tarricone A, Arnedos M, Commeny J, Bonnefoi H, Larmonier C, MacGrogan G. An immunological signature to predict outcome in patients with triple-negative breast cancer with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100502. [PMID: 35759853 PMCID: PMC9434232 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background When triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients have residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), they have a high risk of metastatic relapse. With immune infiltrate in TNBC being prognostic and predictive of response to treatment, our aim was to develop an immunologic transcriptomic signature using post-NACT samples to predict relapse. Materials and methods We identified 115 samples of residual tumors from post-NACT TNBC patients. We profiled the expression of 770 genes related to cancer microenvironment using the NanoString PanCancer IO360 panel to develop a prognostic transcriptomic signature, and we describe the immune microenvironments of the residual tumors. Results Thirty-eight (33%) patients experienced metastatic relapse. Hierarchical clustering separated patients into five clusters with distinct prognosis based on pathways linked to immune activation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cell cycle. The immune microenvironment of the residual disease was significantly different between patients who experienced relapse compared to those who did not, the latter having significantly more effector antitumoral immune cells, with significant differences in lymphoid subpopulations. We selected eight genes linked to immunity (BLK, GZMM, CXCR6, LILRA1, SPIB, CCL4, CXCR4, SLAMF7) to develop a transcriptomic signature which could predict relapse in our cohort. This signature was validated in two external cohorts (KMplot and METABRIC). Conclusions Lack of immune activation after NACT is associated with a high risk of distant relapse. We propose a prognostic signature based on immune infiltrate that could lead to targeted therapeutic strategies to improve patient prognosis. Infiltrate of cytotoxic cells is higher in the residual disease of TNBC patients who will not experience metastatic relapse. Underexpression of immune-related pathways is associated with metastatic relapse in residual disease of TNBC patients. An immune gene-based signature can predict metastatic relapse in TNBC patients after NACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Blaye
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, Bordeaux, France
| | - É Darbo
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM U1218, ACTION Laboratory, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - V Brouste
- Departments of Clinical Research and Medical Information, Bordeaux, France
| | - V Vélasco
- Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - C Pinard
- Pathology Laboratory, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort de France
| | - N Larmonier
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - I Pellegrin
- Service d'Immunologie et Immunogénétique, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Centre de Ressources Biologiques Plurithématique, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Tarricone
- Service d'Immunologie et Immunogénétique, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Arnedos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - J Commeny
- Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - H Bonnefoi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM U1218, ACTION Laboratory, Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - C Larmonier
- Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - G MacGrogan
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM U1218, ACTION Laboratory, Bordeaux, France; Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Carausu M, Carton M, Dieras VC, Petit T, Guiu Lahaye S, Veyret C, Goncalves A, Augereau P, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Ung M, Desmoulins I, Debled M, Bachelot T, Eymard JC, Pistilli B, Frenel JS, Chevrot M, Mailliez A, Cabel L. Treatment patterns and their impact on the outcome of patients with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer in a large real-world cohort. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.1043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1043 Background: The place of endocrine therapy (ET) in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still not clearly defined. Data suggest that blocking both HR and HER2 signaling pathways could be an efficacious strategy to overcome secondary resistance. Methods: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of first line (L1) therapy for HR+/HER2+ MBC patients (pts) included between 2008- 2017 in the French real-world ESME MBC database (NCT03275311). Our primary endpoints were median overall survival (mOS) and median first progression-free survival (mPFS1). We used descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method to report patient characteristics and outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models and a propensity score were constructed to report and adjust for prognostic factors. Results: From the 23,501 female pts in the ESME MBC cohort, 1,790 pts had HR+/HER2+ MBC treated with Trastuzumab (T, n=1,089) or Trastuzumab-Pertuzumab (TP, n=701) during L1. Among them, 1,584 pts received antiHER2 therapy+CT+/-ET and 206 pts, antiHER2+ET only. Pts with antiHER2+CT+/-ET had more often ECOG performance status 0 (29.5% vs 15.8%, p<0.001), grade III tumors (36.6% vs 25.6%, p=0.007), time to MBC < 6 mo (51.6% vs 29.1%, p<0.001), TP as antiHER2 therapy (43.2% vs 9.4%, p<0.001), ≥3 metastatic sites (23.2% vs 14.8%, p=0.007), visceral metastasis (56.5% vs 42.4%, p<0.001), and less often bone-only disease (18.4% vs 35%, p<0.001) than pts with antiHER2+ET. In multivariable analysis, antiHER2+CT+/-ET was not superior to antiHER2+ET (Table), while TP was superior to Trastuzumab, and this result was confirmed by matching pts using a propensity score ( p=0.76 for mOS and p=0.85 for mPFS1). Using the time-dependent ET variable among pts with antiHER2+CT, pts with maintenance ET had significantly better PFS1 and OS than those without (adjusted HR for PFS1=0.70 [95%CI 0.60-0.82], adjusted HR for OS=0.47 [95%CI 0.39-0.57], p<0.001). Conclusions: These data suggest that endocrine therapy could be an interesting less toxic alternative to chemotherapy in combination with antiHER2 therapy as first line treatment for HR+/HER2+ MBC pts.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mony Ung
- Institut Claudius Regaud (ICR), Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rhanine Y, Bonnefoi HR, Goncalves A, Debled M, Le Moulec S, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Dubroca-Dehez B, Grellety T. Real-life data of antiandrogens (AA) use in metastatic androgen receptor positive triple negative breast cancer (AR+ TNBC): The ATOVAT retrospective French cohort. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e13074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e13074 Background: AR+ TNBC account for around 25% of all TNBC. Identification of those patients is difficult since AR expression (IHC) testing is not routinely recommended. Published data of 3 trials using different antiandrogens (AA) found clinical benefit rates (CBR) at 6 months ranging from 19 to 29% with excellent toxicity profiles. The aim of this retrospective trial was to assess the clinical benefit of AA in real life. Methods: Patients with metastatic AR+ (IHC staining > 10% assessed by local laboratories) TNBC treated with an antiandrogen in metastatic setting were eligible. Patients should have received at least one dose of the following AA: abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide or bicalutamide. Antiandrogens had to be given after documented progression and must not be carried out as part of a clinical trial. Patients could be chemotherapy naïve for their metastatic disease or have received any number of previous line. 30 oncology centers involved in clinical research in France were screened by questionnaire and data were collected in each patient files. The aim was to describe the 6-months CBR and safety in real-life patients. Assessable patients received at least 4 weeks of AA and present at least one disease assessment. Results: 26 patients from 5 French sites were deemed eligible and 24 patients were assessable. Treatment were conducted between January 2002 and January 2021. Median age at initiation of AA was 70 years (range 50-90). 50 % (N = 13) presented liver and/or lung mets and 27% (N = 7) non progressing and non-symptomatic cerebral mets. Median number of previous line of chemotherapy was 3 (range 0-10). AA used were: abiraterone acetate (62%), enzalutamide (8%) and bicalutamide (30%). Median time from mets diagnosis to AA treatment initiation was 18 months (range 0-168). 6-months CBR were 29% (N = 7) with 5 objective responses (2 CR, 3 PR) and 2 SD. 4-months CBR were 33% (N = 8). PFS and OS were 3.2 months (0.8- 36.1) and 9.5 (1.3-63.8) months, respectively. 2 pts further received second line AA with 1 with SD as a best response. 57% (4/7) of patients presenting 6-months clinical benefit received AA in first line versus 18% (3/17).There were no grade 3 or more side effects reported. Conclusions: Real-life data of antiandrogens use in metastatic AR+ TNBC are in line with data from published clinical trials using the same drugs. There were no new safety signal in this retrospective cohort supporting the use of antiandrogens in AR+ (> 10%) TNBC in the absence of other therapeutic opportunity or available clinical trials.
Collapse
|
17
|
Moinard-Butot F, Saint-Martin C, Pflumio C, Carton M, Jacot W, Cottu PH, Diéras V, Dalenc F, Goncalves A, Debled M, Patsouris A, Mouret-Reynier MA, Vanlemmens L, Leheurteur M, Emile G, Ferrero JM, Desmoulins I, Uwer L, Eymard JC, Cheaib B, Courtinard C, Bachelot T, Chevrot M, Petit T. Efficacy of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and lapatinib after dual HER2 inhibition with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in patient with metastatic breast cancer: Retrospective data from a French multicenter real-life cohort. Breast 2022; 63:54-60. [PMID: 35299035 PMCID: PMC8927850 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1), as well as lapatinib plus capecitabine were proven effective in two Phase III studies, following first-line trastuzumab plus a taxane. The introduction of dual HER2 blockade by trastuzumab and pertuzumab as first-line has positioned T-DM1 into second-line, and lapatinib plus capecitabine beyond, without formal evaluation of these strategies. Methods ESME Data Platform (NCT03275311) included individual data from all patients aged ≥18 years, in whom first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was initiated between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. The efficacy of T-DM1 and lapatinib plus capecitabine combination, following double blockade associating trastuzumab and pertuzumab were evaluated in this national real-life database. Eligibility criteria were: female, MBC, HER2+ tumor, first-line taxane-based chemotherapy and dual HER2-blockage by trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. Cohort A received second-line T-DM1, and Cohort B second-line T-DM1 and third or fourth-line lapatinib plus capecitabine. Results Cohort A comprised 233 patients, and Cohort B 47 patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months in Cohort A and 4.6 months in Cohort B. Median overall survival were 36.7 months and 12.9 months, respectively. PFS was significantly dependent on the preceding treatment line's duration. In cohort A, HER2 expression status was a significant predictive factor of PFS. Conclusion First-line trastuzumab plus pertuzumab do not markedly diminish T-DM1's efficacy in second-line. Similarly, sequential treatment with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab then T-DM1 does not noticeably modify the efficacy of lapatinib plus capecitabine. French real-life cohort. Dual blockade HER2 does not markedly diminish T-DM1's activity in second-line and lapatinib's activity in third or fourth line. The second-line (T-DM1) PFS was significantly longer when the first-line treatment with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab was ≥12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Moinard-Butot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg - Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Caroline Saint-Martin
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Carole Pflumio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg - Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France
| | - Matthieu Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France; Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - Paul-Henri Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Nantes & Angers, 15 Rue André Boquel, 49055, Angers, France
| | - Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63011, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Laurence Vanlemmens
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rue d'Amiens, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - George Emile
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valambrose, 06189, Nice, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Bourgogne, 21079, Dijon, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Eymard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, 1 Rue du Général Koenig, 51100, Reims, France
| | - Bianca Cheaib
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Coralie Courtinard
- Unicancer, Data Office, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France; Université de Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Epicene Team, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Michaël Chevrot
- Unicancer, Data Office, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg - Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Béchade D, Bellera C, Gauquelin L, Soubeyran I, McKelvie-Sebileau P, Debled M, Chomy F, Roubaud G, Fonck M, Pernot S, Roch A, Cazeau AL. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT)-positive mediastinal lymphadenopathies in patients with thoracic or extra-thoracic malignancies. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2022; 46:101912. [PMID: 35341993 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2022.101912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The high sensitivity of PET-CT can identify hypermetabolic mediastinal adenopathies during cancer management, but specificity is low and a biopsy is sometimes required to eliminate benign adenopathies. METHODS This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included patients with hypermetabolic mediastinal lymphadenopathies revealed on PET-CT during either the initial management of a cancer, treatment evaluation, or monitoring. All patients underwent EUS-FNA. Diagnoses of malignancy based on cytological analysis following EUS-FNA were compared with clinical and radiological follow-up information. The treatment strategy decided before the results of the EUS-FNA pathology reports (Multidisciplinary Team Meeting [MTM-1]) was recorded and compared to the treatment strategy decided once pathological data from EUS-FNA were available (MTM-2). MAIN FINDINGS Between 2013 and 2018, 75 patients were included with 47 eligible and evaluable patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EUS-FNA were 93%, 100%, 100% and 90%, respectively. The concordance value between the therapeutic strategies determined for MTM-1 and MTM-2 was 44.7%. There were no significant differences in the intensity of fixation on PET-CT between malignant and benign lesions. CONCLUSION The diagnostic accuracy of the minimally invasive EUS-FNA procedure is sufficiently robust to avoid the need for diagnostic surgery. The combination of PET-CT and EUS-FNA may alter the therapeutic strategy that would be considered after PET-CT alone. REGISTRATION NCT01892501.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Béchade
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - Carine Bellera
- Inserm CIC1401, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Epicene Team, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Lisa Gauquelin
- Inserm CIC1401, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - François Chomy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Marianne Fonck
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Simon Pernot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Alexandre Roch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Bergonié, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne-Laure Cazeau
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Bergonié, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Blaye C, Darbo E, Debled M, Brouste V, Vélasco V, Pinard C, Pellegrin I, Tarricone A, Arnedos M, Commeny J, Bonnefoi H, Larmonier C, Macgrogan G. 8P An immunological signature to predict outcome in patients with triple-negative breast cancer with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
20
|
Maire M, Debled M, Petit A, Fournier M, Macgrogan G, Quenel-Thueux N, Charitansky H, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Bonnefoi H, Tunon de Lara C. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: Safety and efficacy of reverse sequence compared to standard technique? Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:1699-1705. [PMID: 35523623 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reverse sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy, mastectomy then immediate breast reconstruction is currently proposed for selected patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Few studies have compared it to the standard sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy with or without differed reconstruction. Our study compares overall (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survivals of breast cancer patients treated with reverse sequence compared to the standard technique. METHODS In this retrospective, single center study at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in France, patients were included if: female, age <65y, had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy, and were M0. Outcomes for patients treated by reverse sequence (RS) are compared to those for patients treated by standard sequence (ST). Data was collected from medical records. RESULTS From January 2009 to April 2018, 222 eligible patients were treated, 46 by RS and 176 by ST. Mean follow-up was 61.7 months. Five-year OS and RFS did not differ between groups. 5-yr OS: 88.4% 95%CI [74.1-95.0] for RS and 81.5% 95%CI [74.0-87.0] for ST (P = 0.4412); 5-yr RFS: 78.3% 95%CI [61.9-88.3] for RS and 70.1% 95%CI [62.2-76.7] for ST (P = 0.3003). Overall treatment time was significantly shorter in the RS group, and the rate of severe surgical complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS For locally advanced breast cancer patients with an indication for radiation therapy the reverse sequence offers similar safety and efficacy results as the standard treatment while allowing immediate breast reconstruction. However, careful patient selection is necessary, particularly with regard to preoperative lymph node invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Maire
- Univ. Bordeaux, 146 Rue Léo Saignat, 33000, Bordeaux, France; Department of Surgery Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Adeline Petit
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marion Fournier
- Department of Surgery Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Gaëtan Macgrogan
- Department of Pathology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nathalie Quenel-Thueux
- Department of Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Hélène Charitansky
- Department of Surgery Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier
- Univ. Bordeaux, 146 Rue Léo Saignat, 33000, Bordeaux, France; Department of Biostatistics, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Hervé Bonnefoi
- Univ. Bordeaux, 146 Rue Léo Saignat, 33000, Bordeaux, France; Department of Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gaillard T, Carton M, Mailliez A, Desmoulins I, Mouret-Reynier M, Petit T, Leheurteur M, Dieras V, Ferrero J, Uwer L, Guiu S, Gonc¸alves A, Levy C, Debled M, Dalenc F, Patsouris A, Bachelot T, Eymard J, Chevrot M, Conversano A, Robain M, Hequet D. Corrigendum to “De novo metastatic breast cancer in patients with a small locoregional tumour (T1-T2/N0): characteristics and prognosis” [Eur J Cancer 158 (2021) 181–188]. Eur J Cancer 2022; 166:311-312. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
22
|
Carausu M, Carton M, Cabel L, Patsouris A, Levy C, Verret B, Pasquier D, Debled M, Gonçalves A, Desmoulins I, Lecouillard I, Bachelot T, Ferrero JM, Eymard JC, Mouret-Reynier MA, Chevrot M, De Maio E, Uwer L, Frenel JS, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Darlix A, Bozec L. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer patients with isolated central nervous system metastases in the multicentre ESME database. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221077082. [PMID: 35237352 PMCID: PMC8883300 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221077082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: As a result of progress in diagnosis and treatment, there is a growing prevalence of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with isolated CNS metastases. This study describes the largest-to-date real-life cohort of this clinical setting and compares it to other clinical presentations. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC database including patients who initiated treatment for MBC between 2008 and 2016. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Descriptive statistics and multivariate Cox model were used. Results: Of 22,266 patients, 647 (2.9%) and 929 (4.2%) patients had isolated first-site CNS metastases or combined with extra-CNS metastases, with longer OS for the group with isolated CNS metastases (16.9 versus 13.9 months, adjusted HR = 1.69 (95% CI: 1.50–1.91), p < 0.001). Among the 541 (2.4%) patients with isolated CNS metastases and no intrathecal therapy (excluding leptomeningeal metastases), HER2+ cases were preponderant over TN or HR+ /HER2− cases (41.6% versus 26.1% versus 28.5%, respectively, p < 0.01). The treatment strategy consisted of a combination of local treatment and systemic therapy (49.2%), local treatment only (35.5%) or systemic therapy only (11.4%), or symptomatic therapy only (3.9%). Median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 5.7–6.8). Median OS was 20.7 months (95% CI: 17.3–24.3), reaching 37.9 months (95% CI: 25.9–47.6) in the HR+ /HER2+ subgroup. Older age, TN subtype, MBC-free interval of 6–12 months, lower performance status, and WBRT were associated with poorer survival. Patients who received systemic therapy within 3 months from MBC diagnosis had longer OS (24.1 versus 16.1 months, p = 0.031), but this was not significant on multivariate analysis [HR = 1.0 (95% CI: 0.7–1.3), p = 0.806]. Conclusions: Patients with isolated CNS metastases at MBC diagnosis represent a distinct population for which the role of systemic therapy needs to be further investigated in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Carausu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Matthieu Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Luc Cabel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Benjamin Verret
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | | | | | - Eleonora De Maio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Sébastien Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest–René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Amélie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, INSERM U1191-CNRS UMR 5203, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurence Bozec
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 35 rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sevenet N, de Lara CT, Leroux J, Bonnet F, Debled M, Lafon D, Barouk-Simonet E, Fournier M, Petit A, Bubien V, Quenel-Tueux N, Brouste V, MacGrogan G. Abstract P2-07-10: Germline BRCA screening for locally advanced breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Defining a subgroup with high rate of mutation and local relapses. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p2-07-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is proposed for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to increase the breast conservative treatment (BCT). In France, mastectomy is the risk-reducing prophylactic surgical strategy only for pre-symptomatic germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm) patients. On the other hand, BCT is proposed to all patients following NAC based on clinical response, even for patients do not demonstrating germline BRCA mutation. Moreover, in the case of BRCA mutation, local recurrence risk is higher in the BCT group (23%) vs mastectomy (5%). The aim of this retrospective one-institution analysis is to evaluate if the knowledge of gBRCAm status impact shared surgical decision between surgeons and patients. Patients and methods: Inclusion criteria were: (i) patients treated for unilateral LABC, T2-4, N≥0, M0 by NAC, and (ii) patients who underwent germline BRCA screening. BRCA screening, using targeted next-generation screening, was carried out either during NAC (rapid process) or after surgery. Deleterious mutations were confirmed using Sanger sequencing before passing on the results to the clinical geneticist. Some gBRCAm patients from Olympia clinical trial study were also included. Patients were followed-up over a long term for overall survival (OS), local recurrence (LR) and disease-free recurrence interval (DRFI). Chi-square, Fischer test and T-test and Wilcoxon test were used to generate statistical descriptive analysis. Results: Between 2007 and 2015, 988 women were treated for LABC at our institution. Among them, 151 patients underwent clinical genetic testing for gBRCAm based on these criteria: young age at diagnosis or familial history of breast or ovarian cancer or histological characteristics as grade 2/3, Her2-3+ or basal like. A total of 125 patients were included in the study; 27 patients had germline mutations (MT group) and no mutations were detected in 98 patients (WT). Significant differences between the two groups (MT vs WT) were observed for - Intrinsic tumor subtypes basal like (64.3% vs 42.5%, p=0.0432) - ER are more often negative (21.4% vs 46.8%, p=0.0165). Among the 29 patients who underwent germline screening during NAC and eligible for BCT, all the patients with gBRCAm choose mastectomy (100%). Among the 96 patients with screening mutation after breast cancer treatment, 6 of the 19 patients with gBRCAm had a mastectomy (28%). In the 25 gBRCAm patients, 15 had a BCT and 11 a mastectomy. In the 98 wtBRCA patients, 70 had a BCT and 28 a mastectomy. After a follow-up of 76.8 months of 83 patients with BCT, we observed 9 LR, 7% in the WT group and 30.8% in the MT group. The median delay of disease recurrence is 40.8 months [22-113]. According DRFI and OS, there is not statistically difference between the WT and the MT group, at 3 years and 5 years of follow up. Discussion: In this selected subgroup of patients, gBRCAm rate is higher (21%) than the rate based on familial criteria for BRCA testing (12%). Regarding the rationale for BCT or mastectomy procedure in LABC and pre-symptomatic gBRCAm patients, this study led us to establish mastectomy as the sole risk-reducing strategy surgery procedure for gBRCAm patients. Moreover, 100% gBRCAm patients chose mastectomy; the mastectomy rate was lower when the patient was unaware of their BRCA status (26%). The LR rate was higher in the gBRCAm vs wtBRCA with a statistical difference. In LABC patients with high genetic risk, the knowledge of mutation status could influence patients’ and surgeons’ choice of surgery. In case of gBRCAm status, mastectomy is recommended to decrease LR risk
Citation Format: Nicolas Sevenet, Christine Tunon de Lara, Jeanne Leroux, Françoise Bonnet, Marc Debled, Delfine Lafon, Emmanuelle Barouk-Simonet, Marion Fournier, Adeline Petit, Virginie Bubien, Nathalie Quenel-Tueux, Véronique Brouste, Gaëtan MacGrogan. Germline BRCA screening for locally advanced breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Defining a subgroup with high rate of mutation and local relapses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-10.
Collapse
|
24
|
Cabel L, Carton M, Dieras V, Petit T, Guiu S, Veyret C, Goncalves A, Uwer L, Augereau P, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Dalenc F, Desmoulins I, Mouret-Reynier MA, Debled M, Bachelot T, Eymard JC, Pistilli B, Frenel JS, Chevrot M, Mailliez A, Carausu M. Abstract P4-05-02: Impact of hormone receptor status on clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes among HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients in the ESME database. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p4-05-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction. Evidence suggests that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients have different clinical characteristics and outcomes according to the hormone receptor (HR) status. We aimed to evaluate the impact of HR status in this population extracted from a large real-world database. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of HER2+ MBC patients (pts) included in the real world ESME MBC database (NCT03275311) between 2008 and 2017. Descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to report characteristics, outcomes and prognostic factors. Results. Of 4,145 HER2+ MBC pts eligible for our analysis, 1,449 (35%) had HR-negative (HR-), while 2,696 (65%) had HR-positive (HR+) tumors. Pts with HR- tumors had metastases earlier (median 9.3 vs 28.0 mo from primary cancer), had more often de novo MBC (47.6% vs 38.1%), grade III tumors (50.9% vs 33.6%), visceral metastases (70.9% vs 60.8%) and less often bone only disease (8.4% vs 21.1%) compared to those with HR+ tumors, all p<0.001. Pts with HR+ MBC received less frequently an anti-HER2+ targeted therapy during first line of treatment than pts with HR- tumors (74.9% vs 90.8%, p<0.001). Pts with HR- MBC had significantly worse outcomes than those with HER2+/HR+ MBC, with median overall survival (OS) 42.0 mo [95% CI 38.8-45.2] vs 55.9 mo [95% CI 53.7-59.4], p<0.001, and median progression-free survival (PFS) 9.8 mo [95%CI 9.2-11] vs 12.2 mo [95%CI 11.5-12.9], p=0.012, respectively. The independent prognostic value of HR status was confirmed in a multivariable analysis for OS (HR- versus HR+, hazard ratio=1.25 [1.13-1.39], p<0.001) but not for PFS (hazard ratio=1.03 [95%CI 0.95-1.13], p=0.8) (Table 1 for OS). The multivariable analysis also included tumor grade, age at and time to MBC diagnosis, presence of visceral metastases, number of metastatic sites and performance status as prognostic factors. In the HR+ population, ER and PR statuses were not prognostic. Conclusions. These data confirm the remaining strong and independent adverse prognostic effect of negative hormone receptors among pts with HER2+ MBC treated in the past 12 years.
Cox multivariable model for overall survival in patients with HER2-positive MBCCategoriesNHazard ratio95% CIp valueTumor gradeGrade I/II17711<0.001Grade III15741.13[1.03-1.25]NA5811.15[1.01-1.31]ER/PR statusER+/PR+14571<0.001ER+/PR-9711.03[0.92-1.16]ER-/PR+1021.03[0.77-1.36]ER-/PR-13961.25[1.13-1.39]Age at MBC diagnosis<55 years17561<0.001≥55 years21701.26[1.16-1.38]Time to MBC diagnosis<6 months16351<0.0016-24 months5082.53[2.22-2.89]24-60 months8721.75[1.56-1.96]≥60 months9111.19[1.06-1.35]Visceral metastasesNo14061<0.001Yes25201.54[1.38-1.71]No of metastatic sites<330911<0.001≥38351.65[1.48-1.84]ECOG PSPS 010101<0.001PS 18021.62[1.4-1.87]PS 2-43923.34[2.83-3.95]NA17222.34[2.07-2.64]
Citation Format: Luc Cabel, Matthieu Carton, Veronique Dieras, Thierry Petit, Severine Guiu, Corinne Veyret, Anthony Goncalves, Lionel Uwer, Paule Augereau, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Christelle Levy, Florence Dalenc, Isabelle Desmoulins, Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier, Marc Debled, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Barbara Pistilli, Jean Sebastien Frenel, Michael Chevrot, Audrey Mailliez, Marcela Carausu. Impact of hormone receptor status on clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes among HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients in the ESME database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-05-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Severine Guiu
- Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Lionel Uwer
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Paule Augereau
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Penault-Llorca F, Dalenc F, Chabaud S, Cottu P, Allouache D, Cameron D, Jacquin JP, Grenier J, Bouvet LV, Jegannathen A, Campone M, Piano FD, Debled M, Hardy-Bessard AC, Giacchetti S, Barthelemy P, Kaluzinski L, Mailliez A, Mouret-Reynier MA, Legouffe E, Cayre A, Martinez M, Delbaldo C, Mollon-Grange D, Macaskill EJ, Sephton M, Stefani L, Belgadi B, Winter M, Orfeuvre H, Lacroix-Triki M, Bonnefoi H, Bliss J, Canon JL, Lemonnier J, Andre F, Bachelot T. Abstract PD9-08: Prognostic value of EndoPredict test in patients screened for UNIRAD, a UCBG randomized, double blind, phase III international trial evaluating the addition of everolimus (EVE) to adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) in women with high risk HR+, HER2- early breast cancer (eBC). Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd9-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The double blind randomized UNIRAD trial (NCT01805271) showed no evidence that adding Everolimus (EVE) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (EHT) for high-risk early breast cancer (BC) improved 3-year disease-free survival (iDFS) compared with EHT alone. In this trial, high risk was defined by any T and either ≥4N+, or ≥1N+ after neoadjuvant treatment, or ≥1N+ and EPclin high risk (EPCH) score ≥3.3. This sub analysis is aimed to verify prognostic added value of EndoPredict test results on outcomes in patients screened for the UNIRAD study.. Material and methods: From May 2015 to March 2020, 777 patients were screened with the EndoPredict test. Complete results were obtained for 767 of them. 662 pts were classified as EPCH and 429 were randomized in UNIRAD. 233 pts with EPCH and 105 pts with EPclin low risk (EPCL) were not randomized but followed up for iDFS. Statistical analysis: Kaplan-Meier estimates the association of the integrated molecular-clinico-pathologic EPclin score, and the 12-gene molecular EP score, with iDFS (primary endpoint) and dMFS (secondary endpoint). Independent prognostic added value of EPclin score was tested in a multivariate Cox model after adjusting on tumor characteristics (Grade and T, N). A two-sided p-value less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant, 95% confidence intervals reported with HR. Results: Median follow-up of the cohort was 36.6 mo (0-69) since EndoPredict test. As for the whole population, there was no significant difference in iDFS between treatment arms in the randomized EPCH group. On the other hand, EPclin was an independent prognostic factor for iDFS. 36 mo relapse rate from testing for patients in the EPCL group and the EPCH group was 0% and 7%, respectively (HR supposing continuous EPclin score: 2.36, 95%CI: 1.7-3.3, p < .0001). This difference remained significant when assessed in a cox model with tumor size, number of positive nodes and tumor grade (HR: 1.96, 95%CI: 1.32-2.9, p=0.0008). Furthermore, EPclin results was independently correlated to distant metastatic free survival: 36 mo dMFS for patient in the EPCL and EPCH group was 100% and 94%, respectively (adjusted HR: 2.13, 95%CI:11.3-3.4, p = .0014). Of interest when assessing prognostic of patients within quartiles of EPclin Score (<3.6; 3.6-4.1; ≥4.1-4.8; ≥ 4.8), 36 mo iDFS was 99%; 95%; 94% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion: These prospective results confirm the significance of EPclin score as an independent prognostic parameter in node positive ER+/HER2- eBC patients receiving standard adjuvant treatment. This information can be of importance for selection of specific adjuvant intervention, particularly chemotherapy and new targeted therapy. Further analysis on the EP score will be presented at the meeting.
Citation Format: Frederique Penault-Llorca, Florence Dalenc, Sylvie Chabaud, Paul Cottu, Djelila Allouache, David Cameron, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Julien Grenier, Laurence Venat Bouvet, Apurna Jegannathen, Mario Campone, Francesco Del Piano, Marc Debled, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Sylvie Giacchetti, Philippe Barthelemy, Laure Kaluzinski, Audrey Mailliez, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Eric Legouffe, Anne Cayre, Mathilde Martinez, Catherine Delbaldo, Delphine Mollon-Grange, E. Jane Macaskill, Matthew Sephton, Laëtitia Stefani, Blaha Belgadi, Matthew Winter, Hubert Orfeuvre, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Herve Bonnefoi, Judith Bliss, Jean-Luc Canon, Jerome Lemonnier, Fabrice Andre, Thomas Bachelot. Prognostic value of EndoPredict test in patients screened for UNIRAD, a UCBG randomized, double blind, phase III international trial evaluating the addition of everolimus (EVE) to adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) in women with high risk HR+, HER2- early breast cancer (eBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mario Campone
- Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain & Angers, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne Cayre
- Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Judith Bliss
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mallet A, Lusque A, Levy C, Pistilli B, Brain E, Pasquier D, Debled M, Thery JC, Gonçalves A, Desmoulins I, De La Motte Rouge T, Faure C, Ferrero JM, Eymard JC, Mouret-Reynier MA, Patsouris A, Cottu P, Dalenc F, Petit T, Payen O, Uwer L, Guiu S, Sébastien Frenel J. Real-world evidence of the management and prognosis of young women (⩽40 years) with de novo metastatic breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359211070362. [PMID: 35082924 PMCID: PMC8785354 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211070362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) in young women merits a specific approach given the associated fertility, genetic and psychosocial issues. De novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in young women is an even more serious condition, with limited data available. Methods: We evaluated management of women aged ⩽40 years with de novo MBC in a real-life national multicentre cohort of 22,463 patients treated between 2008 and 2016 (NCT0327531). Our primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in young women versus women aged 41–69 years. The secondary objectives were to compare first-line progression-free survival (PFS1) and to describe treatment patterns. Results: Of the 4524 women included, 598 (13%) were ⩽40 years. Median age at MBC diagnosis was 36 years (range = 20–40). Compared with women aged 41–69 years, young women had more grade III tumours (49% versus 35.7%, p < 0.0001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplified (HER2+) disease (34.6% versus 26.4%, p < 0.0001) and HR–/HER2– disease known as “triple negative breast cancer” (TNBC) (17.1% versus 12.7%, p < 0.0001). BRCA testing was performed for 260 young women, with a BRCA1/2 mutation in 44 (17% of those tested) In young HR+/HER2– patients, chemotherapy (CT) was given as the frontline treatment more frequently compared with older ones (89.6% versus 68.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). After median follow-up of 49.7 months (95% confidence interval, CI = 48.0–51.7), the median OS of young women was 58.5 months, 20.7 months and not attained in HR+/HER2–, TNBC and HER2+ subgroups, respectively. After adjustment for histological subtype, tumour grade, and number and type of metastasis, young women had significantly better OS compared with older ones, except for the TNBC subgroup, for which the outcome was similar. PFS1 was statistically different only in the TNBC subgroup, with 7.8 months for young women and 6.3 months for older women ( p = 0.0015). Conclusion: De novo MBC affects a significant proportion of young women. A subgroup of these patients achieves long OS and merits multidisciplinary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Mallet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest – René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Amélie Lusque
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Christelle Faure
- Department of Surgery Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | | | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest – Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Etablissement Hospitalier Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Olivier Payen
- Department of Real World Data, Data Unit, Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Séverine Guiu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean Sébastien Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest – René Gauducheau, Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gaillard T, Carton M, Mailliez A, Desmoulins I, Mouret-Reynier MA, Petit T, Leheurteur M, Dieras V, Ferrero JM, Uwer L, Guiu S, Gonçalves A, Levy C, Debled M, Dalenc F, Patsouris A, Bachelot T, Eymard JC, Chevrot M, Conversano A, Robain M, Hequet D. De novo metastatic breast cancer in patients with a small locoregional tumour (T1-T2/N0): Characteristics and prognosis. Eur J Cancer 2021; 158:181-188. [PMID: 34689042 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The estimated rate of de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) at the time of diagnosis is between 5 to 12%. International guidelines recommend metastatic work-up (MWU) only in women with advanced breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and prognosis of patients with dnMBC diagnosed without an initial indication for MWU. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, comparative study in dnMBC patients selected from the ESME-MBC cohort. Patients were treated in France between 2008 and 2016. We compared two populations: patients in whom dnMBC was diagnosed by staging although not indicated by guidelines (non-guideline staging [NGS]) and those in whom dnMBC was diagnosed by guideline staging (GS). RESULTS During the study period, 22,463 patients with MBC were included in the ESME cohort. Among them, 6698 were dnMBC patients. In 247 of these patients (6% of dnMBC and 1% of the overall population), dnMBC was diagnosed by non-guideline staging. Women in this group were significantly younger (57 vs. 59 years, p = 0.02) and had fewer metastatic sites at diagnosis than dnMBC-GS patients. The two groups were not significantly different in terms of the other characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were better in the dnMBC-NGS group than in the dnMBC-GS group. The impact on survival was confirmed by univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 1.83 [1.31-2.57], p < 0.01). CONCLUSION This study provides the first description of a very specific population. These patients with dnMBC-NGS were younger and more likely to have oligometastatic disease with a better prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Gaillard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
| | - M Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - A Mailliez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - I Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - M A Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - T Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICANS Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - M Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - V Dieras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - J M Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - L Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - S Guiu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - A Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmette, Marseille, France
| | - C Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - M Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, IUCT-Oncopole Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - A Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers & Nantes, France
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - J C Eymard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France
| | - M Chevrot
- Real World Data Department, Unicancer Data Office, Paris, France
| | - A Conversano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M Robain
- Real World Data Department, Unicancer Data Office, Paris, France
| | - D Hequet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bortolini Silveira A, Bidard FC, Tanguy ML, Girard E, Trédan O, Dubot C, Jacot W, Goncalves A, Debled M, Levy C, Ferrero JM, Jouannaud C, Rios M, Mouret-Reynier MA, Dalenc F, Hego C, Rampanou A, Albaud B, Baulande S, Berger F, Lemonnier J, Renault S, Desmoulins I, Proudhon C, Pierga JY. Multimodal liquid biopsy for early monitoring and outcome prediction of chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:115. [PMID: 34504096 PMCID: PMC8429692 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00319-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are two cancer-derived blood biomarkers that inform on patient prognosis and treatment efficacy in breast cancer. We prospectively evaluated the clinical validity of quantifying both CTCs (CellSearch) and ctDNA (targeted next-generation sequencing). Their combined value as prognostic and early monitoring markers was assessed in 198 HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. All patients were included in the prospective multicenter UCBG study COMET (NCT01745757) and treated by first-line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and before the second cycle of chemotherapy. At baseline, CTCs and ctDNA were respectively detected in 72 and 74% of patients and were moderately correlated (Kendall’s τ = 0.3). Only 26 (13%) patients had neither detectable ctDNA nor CTCs. Variants were most frequently observed in TP53 and PIK3CA genes. KMT2C/MLL3 variants detected in ctDNA were significantly associated with a lower CTC count, while the opposite trend was seen with GATA3 alterations. Both CTC and ctDNA levels at baseline and after four weeks of treatment were correlated with survival. For progression-free and overall survival, the best multivariate prognostic model included tumor subtype (triple negative vs other), grade (grade 3 vs other), ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) at baseline (per 10% increase), and CTC count at four weeks (≥5CTC/7.5 mL). Overall, this study demonstrates that CTCs and ctDNA have nonoverlapping detection profiles and complementary prognostic values in metastatic breast cancer patients. A comprehensive liquid-biopsy approach may involve simultaneous detection of ctDNA and CTCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - François-Clément Bidard
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris and Saint Cloud, Paris, France.,UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | | | - Elodie Girard
- INSERM U900, Institut Curie, Mines ParisTech, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Trédan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Coraline Dubot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris and Saint Cloud, Paris, France
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier University, IRCM INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | - Maria Rios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Caroline Hego
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Aurore Rampanou
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Benoit Albaud
- ICGex Next-Generation Sequencing Platform, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Sylvain Baulande
- ICGex Next-Generation Sequencing Platform, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Shufang Renault
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Charlotte Proudhon
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,INSERM U934 CNRS UMR3215, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France. .,Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris and Saint Cloud, Paris, France. .,Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Earl H, Hiller L, Dunn J, Conte P, D'Amico R, Guarneri V, Joensuu H, Huttunen T, Georgoulias V, Abraham J, Cameron D, Miles D, Wardley A, Romieu G, Debled M, Faure-Mercier C, Lindman H, Fraser J, Cox D, Pivot X. LBA11 Individual patient data meta-analysis of 5 non-inferiority RCTs of reduced duration single agent adjuvant trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2 positive early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.2083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
30
|
Frenel JS, Lusque A, Delaloge S, Ferrero JM, Bachelot T, Desmoulins I, Levy C, Eymard JC, Gonçalves A, Patsouris A, Reynier MM, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Cabel L, Uwer L, Debled M, Chevrot M, Mailliez A, Jacot W, De La Motte Rouge T. 231P Prognosis and efficacy of frontline treatment for HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer occurring in gBRCA1/2 carriers. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
31
|
Bachelot T, Dalenc F, Chabaud S, Cottu P, Allouache D, Brain E, Jacquin JP, Grenier J, Venat Bouvet L, Brunt M, Campone M, Del Piano F, Debled M, Hardy Bessard AC, Giacchetti S, Bliss J, Canon JL, Lemonnier J, Cameron D, André F. Corrigendum to ‘VP1-2021: Efficacy of everolimus in patients with HR+/HER2- high risk early stage breast cancer’. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
32
|
Carausu M, Carton M, Darlix A, Pasquier D, Leheurteur M, Debled M, Mouret-Reynier MA, Gonçalves A, Dalenc F, Verret B, Campone M, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Fumet JD, Lefeuvre-Plesse C, Petit T, Jouannaud C, Larrouquere L, Chevrot M, Cabel L. 102P Breast cancer patients treated with intrathecal therapy for leptomeningeal metastases: Characteristics and validation of prognostic models in a large real-life database. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
33
|
Cottu P, De Laurentiis M, Marchetti P, Coltelli L, Califaretti N, Debled M, Patil S, Evron E, Duhoux F, Menon-Singh L, Wu J, Zhou K, Bofill JS. Abstract PS14-07: Ribociclib + letrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and central nervous system metastases: Subgroup analysis of the phase IIIb CompLEEment-1 trial. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ps14-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Approximately 10-30% of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (BC) are diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, which are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and are associated with a poor prognosis. Due to improving diagnostics and treatments in BC, and therefore longer pt survival, more CNS metastases in breast cancer pts are readily detected. However, pts with CNS metastases are often excluded from clinical trials. Ribociclib (RIB), an oral, selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, is approved for use in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in women with HR+, HER2- ABC. Here, we present a subgroup analysis of pts with CNS metastases at baseline from the Core Phase of CompLEEment-1 (NCT02941926), a Phase IIIb trial of RIB in combination with letrozole (LET) in pts with HR+, HER2- ABC. The eligibility criteria for this study allowed a broader and more diverse pt population than those of previous Phase III trials of RIB + LET, to reflect a typical real-world clinical setting. Methods: CompLEEment-1 included women of any menopausal status and men with HR+, HER2- ABC treated with ≤1 line of prior chemotherapy and no prior hormonal therapy for advanced disease. Pts received RIB (600 mg QD, 3 weeks on/1 week off) in combination with LET (2.5 mg QD, continuous). Men and premenopausal women received a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (3.6 mg goserelin or 7.5 mg leuprolide, Q28D). This subgroup analysis assessed the primary outcomes (safety and tolerability) and secondary outcomes of time to progression (TTP), overall response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) in pts with CNS metastases. Results: At the data cutoff date (November 8, 2019), 51 pts with CNS metastases (1.57%; total pt population N = 3,246) had been evaluated: median age was 56.0 years, 30 (58.8%) pts were postmenopausal, and ECOG PS <2 was observed in 49 (96.1%) pts. Median duration of exposure to RIB was 16.8 months. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 49 (96.1%) pts; with all but one experiencing a treatment-related AE. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 38 (74.5%) pts; serious AEs were reported in 8 pts. There was 1 treatment-related fatal AE (sepsis). The most common all-grade AEs were neutropenia (66.7%), nausea (39.2%), and vomiting (29.4%). The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (51.0%), leukopenia (13.7%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (5.9%), aspartate aminotransferase (5.9%), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (5.9%). Overall, 19 pts (37.3%) had ≥ 1 dose reduction of RIB, 12 (23.5%) due to AEs, and 32 pts (62.7%) permanently discontinued treatment, 6 (11.8%) due to AEs. Median TTP was not estimable (NE) (95% CI, 15.5-NE) in this subgroup analysis; with an event-free probability of 56.1% (95% CI, 39.3-69.8) at 30 months. For the 35 pts with measurable disease and CNS metastases at baseline, ORR was 42.9% (95% CI, 26.3-60.6%) and CBR was 62.9% (95% CI, 44.9-78.5). Conclusions: This subgroup analysis from CompLEEment-1 supports the use of RIB + LET in pts with CNS metastases, who typically have poor outcomes and are frequently excluded from clinical trials. Efficacy results support the use of RIB + LET in HR+, HER2- ABC in a close to real-world setting. The safety profile associated with RIB + LET was manageable, with few pts discontinuing treatment due to AEs, consistent with previous Phase III trials of RIB + LET.
Citation Format: Paul Cottu, Michelino De Laurentiis, Paolo Marchetti, Luigi Coltelli, Nadia Califaretti, Marc Debled, Shekar Patil, Ella Evron, Francois Duhoux, Lakshmi Menon-Singh, Jiwen Wu, Katie Zhou, Javier Salvador Bofill. Ribociclib + letrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and central nervous system metastases: Subgroup analysis of the phase IIIb CompLEEment-1 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS14-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Shekar Patil
- 7Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India
| | - Ella Evron
- 8Oncology Institute, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | | | - Jiwen Wu
- 10Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ
| | - Katie Zhou
- 10Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ
| | - Javier Salvador Bofill
- 11Virgen Del Rocío University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bringuier M, Carton M, Levy C, Patsouris A, Pasquier D, Debled M, Rigal O, Jacot W, Gonçalves A, Desmoulins I, De La Motte Rouge T, Bachelot T, Ferrero JM, Eymard JC, Dalenc F, Mouret-Reynier MA, Petit T, Chevrot M, Courtinard C, Uwer L, Frenel JS, Baldini C. Abstract PS7-46: Enrollment of older metastatic breast cancer patients in clinical trials. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ps7-46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: About 40% of breast cancer cases occur in women 65 years old (yo) or older and 20% in women over 75 yo. These numbers are expected to increase in the near future. Ironically, older patients remain underrepresented in clinical trials with no improvement in the past decade, although they may present different efficacy/toxicity profiles compared with younger adults. In this context, real life cohorts may bring valuable insight to identify potential barriers to recruitment of older patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in clinical trials. Methods: We used the national Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC Data Platform, a multi-center real life database using a retrospective data collection process in 18 French Cancer Centers. Cases selected were adult patients with MBC whose first metastasis was treated between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016. We selected MBC women over 70 yo at the time of MBC diagnosis, with at least one line of systemic treatment and no other cancer in the 5 years before MBC. The primary objective was to describe factors associated with enrollment in clinical trials in older patients, using a multivariable Cox model. Factors included in this model were age (continuous, and by class), period (2008-2011 vs 2012-2016), phenotype (ER+, HER2+, or ER- HER2-), ECOG Performance Status (PS), treatment, metastatic sites (brain, visceral, nodes/bone only) and number, and volume of hospital activity. No geriatric description could be extracted from the database. Results: There were 5846 patients ≥70yo (median age 77) and 15892 patients < 70 yo. Of the older ones, 245 (4.2%) were enrolled in a clinical trial in first line compared with 1602 (10%) for younger ones. Most of the older patients in this cohort (66%) had ER+ HER2+ disease, half had visceral metastases (< 3 metastatic sites in 82%). Median follow-up of older patients was 46.3 months; 95%CI 44.8-49.0. Cause of death was related to disease in 1155 (33.9%) older patients, and related to another cause or unknown in 2156 (63.3%), data were missing for 2441 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 34.1 months in the older population, 95%CI 32.9-35.4, and specific overall survival was 70.8 months, 95%CI 66.3-80.0. Significant factors identified in the multivariable analysis for enrollment in 1st line treatment clinical trial ≥70 are shown in table. Volume of activity was not identified as one.
By multivariate analysis, participation of older patients to a clinical trial was associated with an increased OS (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.8) but not with a better breast cancer specific survival (HR 0.94; 95%CI 0.68-1.29). Conclusions: In this large real-life database, few older MBC patients were enrolled in a trial compared with younger ones. Factors associated with such participation to clinical research were younger age (< 80 yo), good PS, HER2+ disease, and investigational treatment consisting of chemotherapy or targeted therapy. There was a small improvement in accruing older patients between 2007-2011 and 2012-2016 (2.6% versus 5.5%). Most of these factors raise questions on drug availability and perceived potential benefits by investigators and medical teams. Accrual of older patients with cancer in other disease types should be more encouraged.
VariableOR95%CIAge vs 70-75 75-80 80-85 85+0.74 0.47 0.170.54-1 0.31-0.71 0.06-0.37MBC diagnosis period vs 2008-2011 2012-20161.671.23-2.27Phenotype vs Others HER2+1.761.26-2.45PS vs 0 1 2-40.71 0.150.5-1 0.08-0.26Treatment4.88 5.253.08-7.9 3.48-8.14Chemotherapy vs others4.883.08-7.9Targeted treatment vs others5.253.48-8.14
Citation Format: Michael Bringuier, Matthieu Carton, Christelle Levy, Anne Patsouris, David Pasquier, Marc Debled, Olivier Rigal, William Jacot, Anthony Gonçalves, Isabelle Desmoulins, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Florence Dalenc, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Thierry Petit, Michael Chevrot, Coralie Courtinard, Lionel Uwer, Jean-Sebastien Frenel, Capucine Baldini. Enrollment of older metastatic breast cancer patients in clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-46.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Anne Patsouris
- 3Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | | | | | | | - William Jacot
- 7Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier / Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lionel Uwer
- 18Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mailliez A, D'Hondt V, Lusque A, Caron O, Cabel L, Goncalves A, Debled M, Gladieff L, Ferrero JM, Petit T, Mouret-Reynier MA, Eymard JC, Frenel JS, De La Motte Rouge T, Simon G, Delaloge S. Abstract PD10-08: Outcomes of germline BRCA carriers versus non-carriers in the french national metastatic breast cancer ESME cohort 2008-2016. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-pd10-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) carry a deleterious germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm). Retrospective studies suggest that overall survival (OS) is equivalent between gBRCAm carriers and non-carriers with metastatic BC (MBC). We aimed to use the large ESME multicentre national MBC database to compare outcomes of gBRCAm carriers, gBRCA wild-type (WT) and not tested (NT) pts. METHODS: We used the large ESME MBC database (NCT03275311), a unique national cohort of all consecutive pts who initiated a first-line treatment for MBC between 2008 and 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. All pts with data available regarding gBRCA testing were selected for the present analysis. 26 pts with non-BRCA germline mutations were classified in the WT group. The primary endpoint was OS from date of treatment initiation in the 3 groups of patients: gBRCAm, gBRCA WT and gBRCA NT.Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival under first line treatment (PFS1), clinical and biological characteristics of the 3 groups and prognostic factors for OS. Multivariable analyses included the main known prognostic factors (age at MBC, MBC subtype, disease-free interval, presence of visceral disease, number of metastatic sites). They were conducted using Cox proportional analyses. RESULTS: 20624 pts were included in this analysis (414 gBRCAm, 1710 WT, 18500 gBRCA NT). Pts and disease characteristics are summarized in table 1. As expected, patients with gBRCAm were younger and had a higher rate of TNBC and G3 tumors.
Median follow-up was 50.5 months (95%CI 49.7-51.5). Non-adjusted median OS was 30.6 months [21.9-34.3] in the gBRCAm group, 35.8 [32.2-37.8] in the WT and 39.3 [38.3-40.3] in NT groups. Median PFS1 was 7.9 months [6.6-9.3] in the gBRCAm group, 7.8 [7.3-8.5] in the WT and 9.7 months [ 9.5-10.0] in the NT groups. In multivariable analyses, OS and PFS were not significantly different between MBC patients with gBRCA and others (respective HRs 1.01 [0.88;1.17], p=0.87 and 0.94 [0.84;1.06], p=0.31). CONCLUSION: In this large scale real-life ESME MBC database analysis, outcomes of gBRCAm carriers with MBC do not differ from non carriers or not tested subgroups, when adjusted for other prognostic factors.
Table 1: characteristics of patients and diseasegBRCAm. gBRCA WT. gBRCA NT Pvalue (chi-2)N = 414 N = 1710 N = 18500 Age (years) median [range]45 [23-82]48 [20- 88]61 [22-103]p<0.0001Grade 3 N (%) Missing data202 (57.7) 64598 (41.1) 2545337 (34.5)3036p<0.0001Triple negative breast cancer N (%)158 (38.2)370 (21.6)2331 (12.6)p<0.0001De novo MBC N (%)74 (17.9)359 (21)5914 (32)p<0.0001Disease-free interval (months) median [range]39.0 [-1.5- 425.7]36.3 [-2.1- 549.6]31.8 [-2.9- 657.8]p<0.0001Metastatic sites ≥3 N (%)113 (27.3)349 (20.4)3943 (21.3)p=0.008Visceral metastases N (%)279 (67.4)964 (56.4)10659(57.6)p=0.0002Central Nervous System Metastases N (%)66 (15.9)132 (7.7)1145 (6.2)p<0.0001
Citation Format: Audrey Mailliez, Veronique D'Hondt, Amelie Lusque, Olivier Caron, Luc Cabel, Antony Goncalves, Marc Debled, Laurence Gladieff, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Thierry Petit, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Gaëtane Simon, Suzette Delaloge. Outcomes of germline BRCA carriers versus non-carriers in the french national metastatic breast cancer ESME cohort 2008-2016 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Veronique D'Hondt
- 2Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier / Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Saleh K, Carton M, Dieras V, Heudel PE, Brain E, D'Hondt V, Mailliez A, Patsouris A, Mouret-Reynier MA, Goncalves A, Ferrero JM, Petit T, Emile G, Uwer L, Debled M, Dalenc F, Jouannaud C, Ladoire S, Leheurteur M, Cottu P, Veron L, Savignoni A, Courtinard C, Robain M, Delaloge S, Deluche E. Impact of body mass index on overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast 2020; 55:16-24. [PMID: 33307392 PMCID: PMC7725947 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High Body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for breast cancer among postmenopausal women and an adverse prognostic factor in early-stage. Little is known about its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS The National ESME-MBC observational cohort includes all consecutive patients newly diagnosed with MBC between Jan 2008 and Dec 2016 in the 18 French comprehensive cancer centers. RESULTS Of 22 463 patients in ESME-MBC, 12 999 women had BMI data available at MBC diagnosis. Median BMI was 24.9 kg/m2 (range 12.1-66.5); 20% of women were obese and 5% underweight. Obesity was associated with more de novo MBC, while underweight patients had more aggressive cancer features. Median overall survival (OS) of the BMI cohort was 47.4 months (95% CI [46.2-48.5]) (median follow-up: 48.6 months). Underweight was independently associated with a worse OS (median OS 33 months; HR 1.14, 95%CI, 1.02-1.27) and first line progression-free survival (HR, 1.11; 95%CI, 1.01; 1.22), while overweight or obesity had no effect. CONCLUSION Overweight and obesity are not associated with poorer outcomes in women with metastatic disease, while underweight appears as an independent adverse prognostic factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalil Saleh
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Matthieu Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Véronique Dieras
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugéne Marquis, Avenue de La Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre-Etienne Heudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Véronique D'Hondt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, France
| | - Audrey Mailliez
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest Nantes & Angers, 15 Rue André Boquel, 49055, Angers, France
| | - Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63011, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Jean Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valambrose, 06189, Nice, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, 3 Rue de La Porte de L'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - George Emile
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue Du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonie, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Christelle Jouannaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, 1 Rue Du Général Koenig, 51100, Reims, France
| | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 Rue Professeur Marion, 21079, Dijon, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rue D'Amiens, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Lucie Veron
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexia Savignoni
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Coralie Courtinard
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Mathieu Robain
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France.
| | - Elise Deluche
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France; Department of Medical Oncology, CHU de Limoges, 2 Avenue Martin Luther King, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gal J, Milano G, Brest P, Ebran N, Gilhodes J, Llorca L, Dubot C, Romieu G, Desmoulins I, Brain E, Goncalves A, Ferrero JM, Cottu PH, Debled M, Tredan O, Chamorey E, Merlano MC, Lemonnier J, Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Pierga JY. VEGF-Related Germinal Polymorphisms May Identify a Subgroup of Breast Cancer Patients with Favorable Outcome under Bevacizumab-Based Therapy-A Message from COMET, a French Unicancer Multicentric Study. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020; 13:E414. [PMID: 33238394 PMCID: PMC7700430 DOI: 10.3390/ph13110414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The prospective multicenter COMET trial followed a cohort of 306 consecutive metastatic breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy. This study was intended to identify and validate reliable biomarkers to better predict bevacizumab treatment outcomes and allow for a more personalized use of this antiangiogenic agent. To that end, we aimed to establish risk scores for survival prognosis dichotomization based on classic clinico-pathological criteria combined or not with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The genomic DNA of 306 patients was extracted and a panel of 13 SNPs, covering seven genes previously documented to be potentially involved in drug response, were analyzed by means of high-throughput genotyping. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, the hazard model based on a triple-negative cancer phenotype variable, combined with specific SNPs in VEGFA (rs833061), VEGFR1 (rs9582036) and VEGFR2 (rs1870377), had the highest predictive value. The overall survival hazard ratio of patients assigned to the poor prognosis group based on this model was 3.21 (95% CI (2.33-4.42); p < 0.001). We propose that combining this pharmacogenetic approach with classical clinico-pathological characteristics could markedly improve clinical decision-making for breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab-based therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyn Gal
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d’Azur, 06100 Nice, France; (J.G.); (E.C.)
| | - Gérard Milano
- Cancer Pharmacogenetics and Radiogenetics Unit (UPRC) 7497, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d’Azur, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06100 Nice, France
| | - Patrick Brest
- Scientific Research National Center (CNRS), Inserm, Ircan, FHU-Oncoage, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d’Azur, 06100 Nice, France;
| | - Nathalie Ebran
- Oncopharmacology Unit, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d’Azur, 06100 Nice, France; (N.E.); (L.L.); (M.-C.E.-G.)
| | - Julia Gilhodes
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT Oncopole, 31300 Toulouse, France;
| | - Laurence Llorca
- Oncopharmacology Unit, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d’Azur, 06100 Nice, France; (N.E.); (L.L.); (M.-C.E.-G.)
| | - Coraline Dubot
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, St Cloud, 92210 Paris, France; (C.D.); (E.B.); (P.-H.C.); (J.-Y.P.)
| | - Gilles Romieu
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Val d’Aurelle-Paul Lamarque, 34298 Montpellier, France;
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 2100 Dijon, France;
| | - Etienne Brain
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, St Cloud, 92210 Paris, France; (C.D.); (E.B.); (P.-H.C.); (J.-Y.P.)
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13900 Marseille, France;
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d’Azur, 06100 Nice, France;
| | - Paul-Henri Cottu
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, St Cloud, 92210 Paris, France; (C.D.); (E.B.); (P.-H.C.); (J.-Y.P.)
| | - Marc Debled
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Bergonie, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Olivier Tredan
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Leon Berard, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Emmanuel Chamorey
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d’Azur, 06100 Nice, France; (J.G.); (E.C.)
| | - Marco Carlo Merlano
- Oncology Department, S. Croce & Carle Teaching Hospital, 12100 Cuneo, Italy;
| | - Jérôme Lemonnier
- Research & Development Departement, Unicancer, 94270 Paris, France;
| | | | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, St Cloud, 92210 Paris, France; (C.D.); (E.B.); (P.-H.C.); (J.-Y.P.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paris University, 70006 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Puszkiel A, Arellano C, Vachoux C, Evrard A, Le Morvan V, Boyer JC, Robert J, Delmas C, Dalenc F, Debled M, Venat-Bouvet L, Jacot W, Dohollou N, Bernard-Marty C, Laharie-Mineur H, Filleron T, Roché H, Chatelut E, Thomas F, White-Koning M. Model-Based Quantification of Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms and Co-Medications on Pharmacokinetics of Tamoxifen and Six Metabolites in Breast Cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 109:1244-1255. [PMID: 33047329 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Variations in clinical response to tamoxifen (TAM) may be related to polymorphic cytochromes P450 (CYPs) involved in forming its active metabolite endoxifen (ENDO). We developed a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model for tamoxifen and six metabolites to determine clinically relevant factors of ENDO exposure. Concentration-time data for TAM and 6 metabolites come from a prospective, multicenter, 3-year follow-up study of adjuvant TAM (20 mg/day) in patients with breast cancer, with plasma samples drawn every 6 months, and genotypes for 63 genetic polymorphisms (PHACS study, NCT01127295). Concentration data for TAM and 6 metabolites from 928 patients (n = 27,433 concentrations) were analyzed simultaneously with a 7-compartment PopPK model. CYP2D6 phenotype (poor metabolizer (PM), intermediate metabolizer (IM), normal metabolizer (NM), and ultra-rapid metabolizer (UM)), CYP3A4*22, CYP2C19*2, and CYP2B6*6 genotypes, concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitors, age, and body weight had a significant impact on TAM metabolism. Formation of ENDO from N-desmethyltamoxifen was decreased by 84% (relative standard error (RSE) = 14%) in PM patients and by 47% (RSE = 9%) in IM patients and increased in UM patients by 27% (RSE = 12%) compared with NM patients. Dose-adjustment simulations support an increase from 20 mg/day to 40 and 80 mg/day in IM patients and PM patients, respectively, to reach ENDO levels similar to those in NM patients. However, when considering Antiestrogenic Activity Score (AAS), a dose increase to 60 mg/day in PM patients seems sufficient. This PopPK model can be used as a tool to predict ENDO levels or AAS according to the patient's CYP2D6 phenotype for TAM dose adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicja Puszkiel
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Cécile Arellano
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Christelle Vachoux
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Alexandre Evrard
- Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes-Carémeau, Nîmes, France.,IRCM, Inserm, Université de Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France
| | - Valérie Le Morvan
- Inserm U1218, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Boyer
- Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes-Carémeau, Nîmes, France
| | - Jacques Robert
- Inserm U1218, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Caroline Delmas
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - William Jacot
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Filleron
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Henri Roché
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Etienne Chatelut
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Fabienne Thomas
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Melanie White-Koning
- Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Inserm U1037, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Francois A, Lusque A, Levy C, Pistilli B, Brain E, Pasquier D, Debled M, Thery J, Gonçalves A, Desmoulins I, de La Motte Rouge T, Faure C, Ferrero JM, Eymard JC, Reynier MM, Petit T, Payen O, Uwer L, Guiu S, Frenel JS. 306P Real-life management and prognosis of young women (≤ 40 yo) with de novo metastatic breast cancer in the multicenter national observational ESME program. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|
40
|
Delaloge S, Antoine A, Debled M, Jacot W, Cottu P, Dieras V, Dalenc F, Gonçalves A, Patsouris A, Reynier MM, Mailliez A, Clatot F, Levy C, Ferrero JM, Desmoulins I, Uwer L, Robain M, Bachelot T, Brain E, Perol D. 279MO Divergent evolution of overall survival across metastatic breast cancer (MBC) subtypes in the nationwide ESME real life cohort 2008-2016. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
41
|
Pérol D, Carton M, Delaloge S, Mailliez A, Frenel JS, Patsouris A, Levy C, Guiu S, Goncalves A, Mouret-Reynier MA, Desmoulins I, Ferrero JM, De La Motte Rouge T, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Guesmia T, Cabel L, Debled M, Bachelot T, Dalenc F, Uwer L, Jouannaud C, Robain M. Facteurs pronostiques de la survie sans progression chez les patientes atteintes d’un cancer du sein métastatique de type RH+/HER2- avant l’avènement des inhibiteurs CDK dans la cohorte nationale ESME. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2020.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
42
|
Corbaux P, Lardy-Cleaud A, Alexandre M, Fontanilles M, Levy C, Viansone A, Mailliez A, Debled M, Gonçalves A, Le Du F, Lerebours F, Ferrero JM, Eymard JC, Mouret-Reynier MA, Petit T, Frenel JS, Pons-Tostivint E, Courtinard C, Chaix M, Bachelot T. 280MO Progression free survival with endocrine therapy, before or after chemotherapy, in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a large multicenter national observational study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
43
|
Pierga JY, Silveira A, Girard E, Lorgis V, Tanguy ML, Albaud B, Tredan O, Dubot C, Hego C, Jacot W, Goncalves A, Debled M, Levy C, Ferrero JM, Jouannaud C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Dalenc F, Baulande S, Lemonnier J, Berger F, Bidard FC, Proudhon C. Abstract 3390: Predictive and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) compared to circulating tumor cells (CTC) in a prospective cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients: The UCBG COMET trial. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-3390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), monitoring circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can detect mutation associated with resistance to treatment and its variations reflect changes in tumor burden. We prospectively monitored CTC and ctDNA during first line chemotherapy for MBC.
Methods: The French cohort COMET is a prospective study including first line HER2- negative pts receiving weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab. Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL) and before the second cycle of chemotherapy (C2). ctDNA was analyzed by targeted resequencing (custom panel 220kb) SNV (28 genes + 8 promoters and CNA (18 genes).
Results: For ctDNA, out of 196 pts analyzed, 147 had at least one somatic mutation (SNV) detected in plasma (75%). Despite no complete overlap, 24 pts (12%) had no CTC nor ctDNA detected at baseline. Including Copy Number Variation analysis (CNV), the number of patients without detectable ctDNA at baseline could be reduced to 18 (9%). The average number of mutations per pt was 2.4 (range 1 to 9). Median Allelic Frequency (MAF) was 9.1%. Most commonly mutated genes were TP53 and GATA3 with 14% and 7% of all mutations, respectively. TP53 mutations were detected in 31 % of patients and were associated with a shorter progression-free and overall survival. PI3KCA mutations were detected in 23.2% of the pts, were correlated with presence of bone metastasis and had no prognostic value. ESR1 was mutated in 10.6% of the pts, restricted to the ER+ subgroup and had no impact on overall survival. At baseline, CTC and ctDNA levels were correlated (r = 0.40, p < 0.0001). CTC detection was correlated with TP53 mutations detection but not with mutations PI3KCA or ESR1. Only 68 pts (36%) had detectable ctDNA at C2 with a MAF of 2% (0.3%-40%). 52.8% of patients positive for ctDNA at D1C1 became negative at D1C2 and only one negative at baseline became positive at C2.
Correlation rate with CTC was the same after one cycle of chemotherapy (r = 0.40). Median follow-up was 53 months and median OS was 32 months. At multivariate analysis, triple negative status, detectable ctDNA at C2, CTC ≥5 at C2 and grade 3 on primary tumor were independent prognostic for OS.
Conclusion: Early decrease of CTC and/or ctDNA after one cycle of chemotherapy are independent predictive markers of favorable outcome. Compared to CTC, ctDNA allows monitoring of tumor burden during chemotherapy and specific detection of targetable mutations as PI3KCA, HER2 or BRCA.
Citation Format: Jean-Yves Pierga, Amanda Silveira, Elodie Girard, Veronique Lorgis, Marie-Laure Tanguy, Benoit Albaud, Olivier Tredan, Coraline Dubot, Caroline Hego, William Jacot, Anthony Goncalves, Marc Debled, Christelle Levy, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Christelle Jouannaud, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Florence Dalenc, Sylvain Baulande, Jerome Lemonnier, Frederique Berger, Francois-Clement Bidard, Charlotte Proudhon. Predictive and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) compared to circulating tumor cells (CTC) in a prospective cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients: The UCBG COMET trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3390.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - William Jacot
- 5Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Milano G, Gal J, Brest P, Ebran N, Llorca L, Dubot C, Romieu G, Desmoulins I, Brain E, Goncalves A, Ferrero JM, Cottu P, Debled M, Tredan O, Chamorey E, Merlano MC, Lemonnier J. Abstract 4291: VEGFA and VEGFR2 SNPs identify a subgroup of breast cancer patients with favorable outcome under Bevacizumab-based therapy - A message from COMET, a French Unicancer multicentric study. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-4291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Although bevacizumab (BVZ) is no longer unanimously recommended in the management of breast cancer (BRCA), few patients have shown objective benefit under BVZ treatment. We thus hypothesized that individual characteristics (germinal polymorphisms, SNPs) might help to subgroup patients drawing benefit from this therapy. We herein report confirmation of a preliminary pharmacogenetic ancillary study (ASCO 2017, abstract #1079) in the prospective COMET trial conducted on metastatic BRCA patients receiving first-line BVZ associated with paclitaxel. Both the number of patients (203 to 306) and median follow-up (24 to 50 months) were markedly increased.
Methods: Patients were enrolled in the COMET prospective cohort study from 2012 to 2015. Germinal DNA was analyzed by high-throughput genotyping in 306 patients using an 18 SNPs panel covering 7 objectively preselected genes (VEGFA, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, CYP450, CYP2C8, ABCB1, IL8). Dominant and recessive models were investigated to test possible associations between SNPs and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) with a median follow-up of 50 months (CI95%: 47-57). In multivariate analysis, association between clinical characteristics, SNPs and PFS or OS was expressed as a hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval, which was estimated using a Cox proportional-hazards model. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Computational analysis using a GTEX portal was used to determine potential eQTL (expression Quantitative Trait Loci) in tissues.
Results: Median age was 55.5 (28-80), 80% ductal carcinoma, with a majority (57%) of histological grade equal to I or II. In multivariate Cox analysis, histological grade III and rs833061 C/C (VEGF-A) were associated with shorter PFS (HR= 1.7, 95%CI [1.3-2.1], p<0.001; HR= 1.5, 95%CI [1.1-2.0], p=0.02 respectively). Moreover, histological grade III, rs1870377 T/T (VEGFR-2) and rs833061 C/C (VEGF-A) were associated with shorter OS (HR=1.48, 95%CI [1.10-2.0], p=0.008; HR=1.36, 95%CI [1.0-1.85], p=0.04; HR=1.69, 95%CI [1.19-2.39], p=0.002, respectively). Furthermore, for OS, a prognostic score was computed for each patient using Cox model coefficients. The estimated HR of good over poor prognosis for this model was 1.81 (95%CI [1.20-2.73], p=0.003). Median estimates were 46 and 29 months (p=0.003) for good prognosis (n=49/276) and poor prognosis (n=227/276), respectively. In silico SNP functionality analysis indicated an impact of changes on expression (rs833061) or function (rs1870377).
Conclusions: Using an easy-to-perform, low-cost genotyping test, germinal DNA identified predictors for BVZ-based treatment outcome in metastatic BRCA patients. These results open up the possibility of reconsidering BVZ treatment in a defined subgroup of BRCA patients.
Citation Format: Gerard Milano, Jocelyn Gal, Patrick Brest, Nathalie Ebran, Laurence Llorca, Coraline Dubot, Gilles Romieu, Isabelle Desmoulins, Etienne Brain, Anthony Goncalves, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Paul Cottu, Marc Debled, Olivier Tredan, Emmanuel Chamorey, Marco Carlo Merlano, Jerôme Lemonnier. VEGFA and VEGFR2 SNPs identify a subgroup of breast cancer patients with favorable outcome under Bevacizumab-based therapy - A message from COMET, a French Unicancer multicentric study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 4291.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Gilles Romieu
- 3Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Collet L, Eberst L, Fraisse J, Debled M, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Desmoulins I, Goncalves A, Campone M, Ferrero JM, Brain E, Dieras V, Petit T, Simon G, Leheurteur M, Dalenc F, Vanlemmens L, Darlix A, Arnedos M, Bachelot T. Clinical outcome of patients experiencing central nervous system progression on first-line pertuzumab and trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in a real-life cohort. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.2527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2527 Background: Isolated central nervous system (CNS) progression on first-line systemic therapy with Trastuzumab (T) and Pertuzumab (P) for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a therapeutic challenge. Our aim was to describe the clinical outcome and current treatment strategies for such patients in a large retrospective cohort. Methods: Patients (pts) were selected among all MBC pts included in the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) database involving 18 specialized cancer centers (NCT03275311). CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from diagnostic of brain metastases (BM) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Between January 2008 and December 2016, 995 pts were treated with first-line T and P for their HER2-positive MBC. They were 55 years old in median, with tumors expressing hormone-receptors in 62%. A total of 132 pts (13%) experienced isolated CNS progression on T and P, with a median time from metastatic diagnosis to CNS progression of 12 months. It was the first CNS progression for 108 pts (82%) while 24 (18%) already had BM at time of metastatic relapse. After CNS progression, T and P were continued for 58% of pts (n = 73). The remaining 47 pts were switched to another HER2-directed therapy (T-DM1 for 57%, T alone or combined with chemotherapy for 36% and lapatinib for 21%). Among those 132 pts, 37% received whole-brain radiotherapy, 18% stereotactic radiation therapy, and 11% surgery. Systemic treatment was combined with CNS-directed therapy for 50% of pts. Median follow-up is 21 months (95%CI: 14.9-25.5) from the diagnosis of CNS metastases. Median OS (mOS) of the 132 pts is 35 months (95%CI: 29.2-53,6), and median PFS 7 months (95%CI: 6.3- 9.2). A total of 77 pts (58.3%) experienced a new CNS progression with a median CNS-PFS of 9 months (95%CI: 7.6-12,0). Patient who stayed on T and P had a significantly better OS in comparison to pts who were switched to another systemic HER2-directed therapy (mOS not evaluable vs23 months), whereas PFS and CNS-PFS were similar between groups. Conclusions: In this real life setting, isolated CNS progression occurred among 13% of pts with HER2+ MBC on first-line treatment with T and P, after a median time of 12 months. Following current ASCO recommendations, continuation of T and P after CNS-directed therapy, seemed to be adequate. Nevertheless, time to subsequent progression is short and better therapeutic options are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Julien Fraisse
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Christelle Levy
- Centre François Baclesse, Department of Medical Oncology, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Anthony Goncalves
- Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Mario Campone
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, René Gauducheau, St Herblain, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | | | - Thierry Petit
- Paul Strauss Cancer Center and University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, CRCT, Inserm, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Amelie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Frank S, Carton M, Dubot C, Campone M, Pistilli B, Dalenc F, Mailliez A, Levy C, D'Hondt V, Debled M, Vermeulin T, Coudert B, Perrin C, Gonçalves A, Uwer L, Ferrero JM, Eymard JC, Petit T, Mouret-Reynier MA, Patsouris A, Guesmia T, Bachelot T, Robain M, Cottu P. Impact of age at diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer on overall survival in the real-life ESME metastatic breast cancer cohort. Breast 2020; 52:50-57. [PMID: 32380440 PMCID: PMC7375638 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young age is a poor prognostic factor in early stage breast cancer (BC) but its value is less established in metastatic BC (MBC). We evaluated the impact of age at MBC diagnosis on overall survival (OS) across three age groups (<40, 40 to 60 and > 60 years(y)). METHODS ESME MBC database is a national cohort, collecting retrospective data from 18 participating French cancer centers between January 01, 2008 and December 31, 2014. RESULTS Among 14 403 women included, 1077 (7.5%), 6436 (44.7%) and 6890 (47.8%) pts were <40, 40-60 and > 60 y respectively. Pts <40 had significantly more aggressive presentations than other age groups: more frequent HER2+ (25.7 vs 15.3% in >60y) and triple negative subtypes (27.4 vs 14.6% in >60y), and more frequent visceral involvement (36.3 vs 29.8% in >60y). At a median follow-up of 48 months, median OS differed across age groups: 38.8, 38.4 and 35.6 months for pts <40, 40-60 and > 60y, respectively (p < 0.0001). Compared to pts <40y, older pts had a statistically significant higher risk of death (all causes of death included), although of limited clinical value (HR = 1.1, IC 95%:1.01-1.20). There was a significant trend for better OS in pts <40y with HER2+ and luminal diseases. A possible explanation is a greater use of anti-Her2 therapies as first-line treatments: 86.6, 81.9 and 74.9% for pts <40, 40-60 and > 60y, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Although young age seems associated with more aggressive presentations at diagnosis of MBC, it has no deleterious effect on OS in this large series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Frank
- Institut Curie, Paris-Saint Cloud, 26, Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
| | - Matthieu Carton
- Institut Curie, Paris-Saint Cloud, 26, Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
| | - Coraline Dubot
- Institut Curie, Paris-Saint Cloud, 26, Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
| | - Mario Campone
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, site René Gauducheau, Site Hospitalier Nord, Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44800, Saint-Herblain, France.
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- Gustave Roussy, 39, Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France.
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Institut Claudius Régaud, 1, Av Irène Joliot Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France.
| | - Audrey Mailliez
- Centre Oscar Lambret, 3, Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000, Lille, France.
| | - Christelle Levy
- Centre François Baclesse, 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France.
| | - Véronique D'Hondt
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208, Av. Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France.
| | - Marc Debled
- Institut Bergonié, 229, Cours de l'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
| | | | - Bruno Coudert
- Centre Georges-François Leclerc, 1, Rue du Professeur Marion, 21079, Dijon, France.
| | - Christophe Perrin
- Centre Eugène Marquis, Avenue de la Bataille Flandre Dunkerque, 35042, Rennes, France.
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, BD Ste Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, Avenue Bourgogne, 54519, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33, Avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice, France.
| | | | - Thierry Petit
- Centre Paul Strauss, 3, Rue de la Porte de l'Hôpital, 67065, Strasbourg, France.
| | | | - Anne Patsouris
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul Papin, 15, Rue André Boquel, 49055, Angers, France.
| | - Tahar Guesmia
- R&D Unicancer, 67 avenue Fontainebleau 94270 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
| | | | - Mathieu Robain
- R&D Unicancer, 67 avenue Fontainebleau 94270 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
| | - Paul Cottu
- Institut Curie, Paris-Saint Cloud, 26, Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Deluche E, Antoine A, Bachelot T, Lardy-Cleaud A, Dieras V, Brain E, Debled M, Jacot W, Mouret-Reynier MA, Goncalves A, Dalenc F, Patsouris A, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Lorgis V, Vanlemmens L, Lefeuvre-Plesse C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Petit T, Uwer L, Jouannaud C, Leheurteur M, Lacroix-Triki M, Courtinard C, Perol D, Robain M, Delaloge S. Contemporary outcomes of metastatic breast cancer among 22,000 women from the multicentre ESME cohort 2008-2016. Eur J Cancer 2020; 129:60-70. [PMID: 32135312 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM Real-world data inform the outcome comparisons and help the development of new therapeutic strategies. To this end, we aimed to describe the full characteristics and outcomes in the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) cohort, a large national contemporary observational database of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS Women aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed MBC and who initiated MBC treatment between January 2008 and December 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers (N = 22,109) were included. We assessed the full patients' characteristics, first-line treatments, overall survival (OS) and first-line progression-free survival, as well as updated prognostic factors in the whole cohort and among the 3 major subtypes: hormone receptor positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-, n = 13,656), HER2-positive (HER2+, n = 4017) and triple-negative (n = 2963) tumours. RESULTS The median OS of the whole cohort was 39.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.7-40.3). Five-year OS was 33.8%. OS differed significantly between the 3 subtypes (p < 0.0001) with a median OS of 43.3 (95% CI, 42.5-44.5) in HR+/HER2-; 50.1 (95% CI, 47.6-53.1) in HER2+; and 14.8 months (95% CI, 14.1-15.5) in triple-negative subgroups, respectively. Beyond performance status, the following variables had a constant significant negative prognostic impact on OS in the whole cohort and among subtypes: older age at diagnosis of metastases (except for the triple-negative subtype), metastasis-free interval between 6 and 24 months, presence of visceral metastases and number of metastatic sites ≥ 3. CONCLUSIONS The ESME program represents a unique large-scale real-life cohort on MBC. This study highlights important situations of high medical need within MBC patients. DATABASE REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT032753.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Deluche
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, 94800, France; Department of Medical Oncology, CHU de Limoges, France
| | - Alison Antoine
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, Lyon, 69008, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, Lyon, 69008, France
| | - Audrey Lardy-Cleaud
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, Lyon, 69008, France
| | - Veronique Dieras
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugéne Marquis, Avenue de La Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, Rennes, 35000, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm, Paris & Saint-Cloud, 75005, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, Bordeaux, 33000, France
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier, 34298, France
| | - Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 Rue Montalembert, Clermont Ferrand, 63011, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, 13009, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, Toulouse, 31059, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest Nantes & Angers, 15 Rue André Boquel, Angers, 49055, France
| | - Jean Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valambrose, Nice, 06189, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue Du Général Harris, Caen, 14000, France
| | - Veronique Lorgis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, 21079, France
| | - Laurence Vanlemmens
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, Lille, 59000, France
| | - Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugéne Marquis, Avenue de La Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, Rennes, 35000, France
| | | | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, 3 Rue de La Porte de L'Hôpital, Strasbourg, 67000, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54519, France
| | - Christelle Jouannaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, 1 Rue Du Général Koenig, Reims, 51100, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rue D'Amiens, Rouen, 76000, France
| | - Magali Lacroix-Triki
- Department of BioPathology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, 94800, France
| | - Coralie Courtinard
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, Paris, 75654, France
| | - David Perol
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, Lyon, 69008, France
| | - Mathieu Robain
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, Paris, 75654, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, 94800, France.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cabel L, Carton M, Pistilli B, Dalenc F, Vanlemnens L, Levy C, Jacot W, Debled M, Loeb A, Coudert B, Rouge TDLM, Laborde L, Laurent C, Chamorey E, Parent D, Petit T, Mouret-Reynier MA, Perrocheau G, Labreveux C, Bachelot T, Robain M, Lerebours F. Abstract P5-06-18: Prediction of PFS and OS under third and fourth line chemotherapy among metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients in the national multicenter ESME metastatic breast cancer cohort. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p5-06-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Amongst metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts), those with triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) have a poor prognosis. Although chemotherapy (CT) remains the cornerstone therapy, its benefit on outcome is not established beyond second line while side effects increase and impair quality of life. Factors predicting for efficacy might help guiding in the treatment decision process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors predicting for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the third or fourth line treatment in pts with mTNBC within the National multicenter ESME cohort, and to build a nomogram based on the selected variables.
Methods: The ESME (Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics) MBC database (NCT03275311) is a unique national Metastatic Breast Cancer cohort built from existing information systems, pharmacy records and patients’ electronic medical records (EMR), with homogenous on-site collected information. This prospective cohort includes all consecutive pts who initiated a first-line treatment for a MBC between 2008 and 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. We searched for independent prognostic factors under third and fourth line chemotherapy (PFS3 and PFS4, OS3 and OS4) for mTNBC patients, using COX proportional hazard regression models. Variables included in the model were pts and tumour (primary cancer and MBC) characteristics, as well as observed PFS under previous lines of therapy. We built prognostic nomograms based on main prognostic factors retrieved. Nomograms’ prediction ability were evaluated by concordance index (C-index), calibration and subgroup analysis. We used a 6-month cut-off for each PFSx.
Results: Among 22266 women in the ESME cohort, 2922 had a mTNBC. 1792 (61%), 1074 (37%) and 598 (20%) mTNBC pts respectively received at least 2, 3 or 4 lines of CT in the metastatic setting, with a median follow-up of 53.3 months (range 4.6-103). The median PFS3, PFS4, OS3 and OS4 were 2.3 months 95%CI [2.3-2.5], 2.1 months 95%CI [1.9-2.3], 6.6 months 95%CI [6.3-7.2] and 5.9 months 95%CI[5.2-6.4], respectively. PFS1, PFS2 and number of metastatic sites ≤3 at baseline were identified as prognostic factors by multivariate analysis both for OS3 and OS4 (HR 0.76 95%CI[0.66-0.88], HR 0.55 95%CI[0.46-0.65], HR 1.36 95%CI[1.14-1.62], all p<0.001, and HR 0.76 95%CI[0.63-0.91], p<0.001, HR 0.56 95%CI[0.45-0.7], p<0.001, HR 1.37 95%CI[1.07-1.74], p=0.01, respectively). In addition, disease free-interval between primary cancer and metastatic relapse was identified as an independent factor for OS3 (p=0.01) and PFS3 for OS4 (HR 0.75 95%CI[0.57-0.98], p=0.03). Median PFS3, PFS4, OS3 and OS4 according to previous duration of PFS are shown in Table 1. Nomograms predicting for PFS3, PFS4, OS3 and OS4 respectively achieved a C-index of 0.59, 0.58, 0.62, 0.61.
Conclusion: The previous duration of each PFS is a major prognostic factor of PFS and OS in TNBC in 3rd or 4rd of CT among mTNBC pts. However, nomograms predicting for PFS and OS this setting do not reach a clinical utilityTable 1: PFS and OS according to previous PFS duration
Previous PFS 1/2 (months)N=OS3 months [95%CI]HR [95%CI]pPFS3 months[95%CI]HR [95%CI]p≤6/≤65245.2 [4.7-5.9]1<0.0012.1 [1.9-2.2]1<0.001>6/≤63127.3 [6.4-8.7]0.71 [0.61; 0.82]2.4 [2.2-2.6]0.86 [0.75; 1]≤6/>611211.3 [8.1-13.4]0.48 [0.38; 0.6]2.7 [2.3-3.5]0.69 [0.56; 0.85]>6/>612611.9 [9.9-15.2]0.43 [0.34; 0.54]3.5 [3.2-4.1]0.52 [0.42; 0.64]Previous PFS1/2/3N=OS4 months [95%CI]HR [95%CI]PFS4 months [95%CI]HRp≤6/≤6 /≤62284.5 [3.9-5.4]1<0.0011.8 [1.6-1.9]1<0.001≤6/≤6 />6357.0 [4.1-10.9]0.7 [0.47; 1.04]2.1 [1.8-2.8]0.83 [0.57; 1.2]>6/≤6 />6176.9 [4.3-NA]0.7 [0.4; 1.22]3.0 [1.6-NA]0.54 [0.31; 0.94]>6/≤6 /≤61665.6 [4.7-6.7]0.65 [0.52; 0.8]2.3 [1.9-2.7]0.66 [0.54; 0.81]>6/>6 /≤6567.8 [4.9-11.1]0.54 [0.38; 0.75]2.1 [1.8-2.4]0.87 [0.64; 1.18]≤6/>6 /≤6608.1 [6.7-12.7]0.45 [0.33; 0.63]2.4 [1.9-3.0]0.65 [0.49; 0.88]≤6/>6 />61316.7 [5.9-NA]0.3 [0.16; 0.57]4.2 [2.3-NA]0.32 [0.17; 0.59]>6/>6 />62310.7 [8.5-NA]0.25 [0.14; 0.45]4.8 [3.4-8.0]0.33 [0.21; 0.51]
Citation Format: Luc Cabel, Matthieu Carton, Barbare Pistilli, Florence Dalenc, Laurence Vanlemnens, Christelle Levy, William Jacot, Marc Debled, Agnes Loeb, Bruno Coudert, Thubault De la Motte Rouge, Lilian Laborde, Carine Laurent, Emmanuel Chamorey, Damien Parent, Thierry Petit, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Geneviève Perrocheau, Claire Labreveux, Thomas Bachelot, Mathieu Robain, Florence Lerebours. Prediction of PFS and OS under third and fourth line chemotherapy among metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients in the national multicenter ESME metastatic breast cancer cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-06-18.
Collapse
|
49
|
Bechade D, Bellera CA, Cantarel C, Soubeyran I, Debled M, Chomy F, Roubaud G, Fonck M, Cazeau AL. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for the evaluation of hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy mediastinum lower, posterior, and middle, detected by PET-CT with 18F-FDG (PET) (APOGEE Study). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
798 Background: In the context of a new cancer or relapse, the high sensitivity (Se) (95-100%) of PET-CT with 18F-FDG can lead to the demonstration of hypermetabolic mediastinal adenopathies. Its lower specificity (Sp) (89%) can require histological examination. We report the results of a prospective, single-center study evaluating the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA in this indication. Methods: Prospective single-center study featuring patients in whom PET had revealed hypermetabolic mediastinal lymphadenopathy requiring diagnostic certainty. All EUS-FNA were performed with a 19-gauge needle (EchoTip, Cook Endoscopy). Main objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance in terms of Se and Sp of EUS-FNA in the characterization of hypermetabolic mediastinal adenopathies in PET in the context of a new cancer or relapse. Secondary objectives: To evaluate the negative predictive value (NPV) of the EUS-FNA and to evaluate the percentage of surgical diagnostic procedures avoided. The standard technique was a thoraco-abdominopelvic CT scan at 6 months and at 12 months. Results: 52 patients were eligible and evaluable for the primary endpoint. The most common primary cancers were mammary (17.3%) and bronchial (13.5%). The lymph nodes were analyzed as malignant in 44.2% of cases, benign in 50% of cases and atypical or suspicious in 3.8% of cases. The malignant lymph nodes were metastatic for breast cancer in 21.7% of cases, bronchial cancer in 17.4% of cases, colorectal cancer in 17.4% of cases and prostate cancer in 13% of cases. The Se of the EUS-FNA was 92% (95% CI 0.74-0.99) and the Sp 100%. NPV was 87% (95% CI: 0.59-0.98). A diagnostic surgical procedure was necessary in 2% of the cases. PET and EUS-FNA often allowed the modification of the therapeutic strategy. Conclusions: When a confirmed diagnosis is required, the diagnostic accuracy of the minimally invasive procedure of EUS-FNA, is sufficiently robust to avoid a surgical diagnosis technique. The combination of PET and EUS-FNA may alter the therapeutic strategy that would have been considered after PET alone. Clinical trial information: NCT01892501.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carine A. Bellera
- INSERM CIC 14.01 Bordeaux, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vasseur A, Cabel L, Tredan O, Chevrier M, Dubot C, Lorgis V, Jacot W, Goncalves A, Debled M, Levy C, Ferrero JM, Jouannaud C, Luporsi E, Mouret-Reynier MA, Dalenc F, Lemonnier J, Savignoni A, Tanguy ML, Bidard FC, Pierga JY. Prognostic value of CEC count in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy: a prospective validation study (UCBG COMET). Angiogenesis 2019; 23:193-202. [PMID: 31773439 DOI: 10.1007/s10456-019-09697-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proof of concept studies has reported that circulating endothelial cell (CEC) count may be associated with the outcome of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated by chemotherapy and the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab. We report the results obtained in an independent prospective validation cohort (COMET study, NCT01745757). METHODS The main baseline criteria were HER2-negative mBC, performance status 0-2 and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. CECs were detected by CellSearch® from 4 ml of blood at baseline and after 4 weeks of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab therapy. CEC counts (considered both as a continuous variable and using the previously described 20 CEC/4 ml cutoff) were associated with clinical characteristics and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS CEC count was obtained in 251 patients at baseline and in 207 patients at 4 weeks. Median baseline CEC count was 22 CEC/4 ml (range 0-2231). Baseline CEC counts were associated with performance status (p = 0.02). No statistically significant change in CEC counts was observed between baseline and 4 weeks of therapy. High baseline CEC count was associated with shorter PFS in univariate and multivariate analyses (continuous: p < 0.001; dichotomized: HR 1.52, 95% CI [1.15-2.02], p = 0.004). CEC counts at 4 weeks had no prognostic impact. CONCLUSION This study confirms that CEC count may be associated with the outcome of mBC patients treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. However, discrepancies with previous reports in terms of both the timing of CEC count and the direction of the prognostic impact warrant further clinical investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Vasseur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint Cloud, France
| | - Luc Cabel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint Cloud, France.,UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Olivier Tredan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leon Berard Center, Lyon, France
| | - Marion Chevrier
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris & Saint Cloud, France
| | - Coraline Dubot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint Cloud, France
| | - Véronique Lorgis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges-François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM) Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier University, IRCM INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Aix-Marseille Univ, Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Center, Nice, France
| | | | - Elisabeth Luporsi
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICL Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | | | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Alexia Savignoni
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris & Saint Cloud, France
| | - Marie-Laure Tanguy
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris & Saint Cloud, France
| | - Francois-Clement Bidard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint Cloud, France.,UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint Cloud, France. .,Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|