p4EBP1 staining predicts outcome in ER-positive endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer patients treated with everolimus and exemestane

BACKGROUND

To identify patients most likely to respond to everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, a prospective biomarker study was conducted in hormone receptor-positive endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer patients treated with exemestane-everolimus therapy.

METHODS

Metastatic tumor biopsies were processed for immunohistochemical staining (p4EBP1, PTEN, pAKT, LKB1, and pS6K). ESR1, PIK3CA and AKT1 gene mutations were detected by NGS. The primary endpoint was the association between the p4EBP1 expression and clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 6 months of everolimus plus exemestane treatment.

RESULTS

Of 150 patients included, 107 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. p4EBP1 staining above the median (Allred score ≥6) was associated with a higher CBR at 6 months (62% versus 40% in high-p4EBP1 versus low-p4EBP1, χ2 test, p = 0.026) and a longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS of 9.2 versus 5.8 months in high-p4EBP1 versus low-p4EBP1; p = 0.02). When tested with other biomarkers, only p4EBP1 remained a significant predictive marker of PFS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.591; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified a subset of patients with hormone receptor-positive endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer and poor outcome who would derive less benefit from everolimus and exemestane. p4EBP1 may be a useful predictive biomarker in routine clinical practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02444390.

Abstract P4-07-54: Health related quality of life of patients treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: impact of clinical factors

Background: Advances in screening and treatment have led to increase in breast cancer (BC) survival in recent years but prognoses for metastatic BC remain poor with poorer outcomes as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Treatment as bevacizumab and paclitaxel for metastatic BC, although that can increase time to progression of disease, often carry toxicity and is not curative but rather palliative in intent with the goal to improve or maintain HRQOL. The aim of this work was to assess impact of clinical factors such as disease progression, toxicity on HRQOL. Methods: COMET study is a multicenter prospective single-arm cohort study in France whose main objective was to identify biological factor that could predict the clinical benefit of bevacizumab-paclitaxel combination therapy as first treatment in HER2 negative metastatic BC. HRQOL was assessed at baseline, at every cycle (every for 4 weeks) until progression and then every 3 months up to death using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and its BC specific module, the EORTC QLQ-BR23. In this ancillary study, we targeted 5 dimensions HRQOL for the primary analyses: Global health status (GHS), physical functioning (PF), Emotional functioning (EF), fatigue (FA) and pain (PA). The primary endpoint was time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in HRQOL scales that defined as time between inclusion and the first decrease HRQOL score ≥ 5 points compared to baseline score, with no further improvement of at least 5 points. Multivariable Cox model with time dependent covariate was performed to assess clinical factors associated with TUDD for each of the 5 target dimensions HRQOL. We performed 3 models for each dimension: model 1 including all covariate with p< 0.10 in univariable; model 2 including model 1 and adjusted on cancer subtype and model 3 included model 1 stratified by cancer subtype. P value < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 510 patients included in COMET study, 432 patients with available HRQOL data were analyzed in this study. Median age at inclusion was 58 years (range: 29-83), and 24.4% of patients had triple negative tumor subtype. About 79 % of cancers were invasive ductal carcinoma and 43 % patients had least 3 metastasis sites at baseline. At baseline, patients reported a mean score for GHS of 57.6 (SD=22.7), for PF of 75.8 (23.2), for EF of 62.2 (25.8), for FA of 42.2 (29.60) and for PA of 38.1 (31.5). The Median TUDDs for the 5 targeted dimensions was 10.1 months [7.5-16.9] for GHS, 6.1 months [4.1-8.9] for PF, 21.6 [18.7-31.2] for EF, 10.8 [6.2-16.6] for FA and 13.6[10.1-22.5] months for PA. In multivariable analyses, Disease Progression was associated with TUDD of GHS (HR [99%CI] =2.4 [1.2-4.9] and TUDD of PF (2.1 [1.1-3.7]). After adjusted on cancer subtype, association persisted with TUDD of GHS (p=0.009). Performance Status was associated with TUDD of PF (1.6 [1.2-2.3]), and TUDD of Pain (1.6 [1.1-2.3]). Performance Status association with TUDD of PF continued after adjustment on cancer subtype (p=0.0003). Prior endocrine therapy was associated with TUDD of pain in patients with tumor with positive hormone receptor (HR+) (2.4 [1.2-4.7]). There was no factor associated with TUDD of EF and TUDD of FA. Conclusion: Results of this study have shown that among the 5 targeted dimensions HRQOL, Physical Functioning was deteriorated in the shortest time. Disease progression, base line performance status and prior endocrine therapy for HR+ subtype, are clinical factors that could influence HRQOL in HER2 negative metastatic BC treated with first line chemotherapy.

Citation Format: Oumar Billa, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Marion Chevrier, Franck Bonnetain, Isabelle Desmoulins, William Jacot, Olivier Trédan, Marc Debled, Christelle Levy, Anthony Gonçalves, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Florence Dalenc, Christelle Jouannaud, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Mireille Mousseau, Julien Grenier, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Fatima-Zohra Toumi, Frédérique Berger, Jérôme Lemonnier, Jean-Yves Pierga. Health related quality of life of patients treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: impact of clinical factors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-54.

CHEOPS trial: a GINECO group randomized phase II assessing addition of a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor to oral vinorelbine in pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The objective of the CHEOPS trial was to assess the benefit of adding aromatase inhibitor (AI) to metronomic chemotherapy, oral vinorelbine, 50 mg, three times a week for pre-treated, HR + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients.

METHODS

In this multicentric phase II study, patients had to have progressed on AI and one or two lines of chemotherapy. They were randomized between oral vinorelbine (Arm A) and oral vinorelbine with non-steroidal AI (Arm B).

RESULTS

121 patients were included, 61 patients in Arm A and 60 patients in Arm B. The median age was 68 years. 109 patients had visceral metastases. They all had previously received an AI. The study had been prematurely stopped following the third death due to febrile neutropenia. Median PFS trend was found to be different with 2.3 months and 3.7 months in Arm A and Arm B, respectively (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.50-1.06, p value = 0.0929). No statistical difference was shown in OS and better tumor response. 56 serious adverse events corresponding to 25 patients (21%) were reported (respectively, 12 (20%) versus 13 (22%) for arms A and B) (NS).

CONCLUSION

The addition of AI to oral vinorelbine over oral vinorelbine alone in aromatase inhibitor-resistant metastatic breast cancer was associated with a non-significant improvement of PFS. Several unexpected serious adverse events were reported. Metronomic oral vinorelbine schedule, at 50 mg three times a week, requires close biological monitoring. The question of hormonal treatment and chemotherapy combination remains open.

Everolimus Added to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, improves progression-free survival in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in postmenopausal women with aromatase inhibitor-resistant metastatic breast cancer. However, the benefit of adding everolimus to ET in the adjuvant setting in early breast cancer is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized double-blind phase III study, women with high-risk, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary breast cancer were randomly assigned to everolimus or placebo for 2 years combined with standard ET. Stratification factors included ET agent, receipt of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy, progesterone receptor status, duration of ET before random assignment, and lymph node involvement. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01805271).

RESULTS

Between June 2013 and March 2020, 1,278 patients were randomly allocated to receive everolimus or placebo. At the first interim analysis, the trial was stopped for futility and a full analysis undertaken once data snapshot complete. One hundred forty-seven patients have had a DFS event reported and at 3 years, DFS did not differ between patients who received ET plus everolimus (88% [95% CI, 85 to 91]) or ET plus placebo (89% [95% CI, 86 to 91; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.32; P = .77]). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 22.9% of patients (29.9% with everolimus v 15.9% with placebo, P < .001). 53.4% everolimus-treated patients permanently discontinued experimental treatment early compared with placebo-treated 22.3%.

CONCLUSION

Among high-risk patients, everolimus added to adjuvant ET did not improve DFS. Tolerability was a concern, with more than half of patients stopping everolimus before study completion. Everolimus cannot be recommended in the adjuvant setting.

Abstract PD8-02: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for advanced breast cancer patients (ABC), regardless HER2 status: A phase II study with biomarkers analysis (DAISY)

Background: The HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated efficacy in heavily pretreated HER2-over- and HER2-low expressing ABC (1, 2). We aimed to assess the activity of T-DXd in HER2-over-, HER2-low and HER2-nul expressing ABC, to describe the drug mechanisms of action in the 3 cohorts and to identify biomarkers associated to drug response or resistance. Study Description: DAISY is a multicenter, open-label phase II trial designed to assess the efficacy of single agent T-DXd at 5.4 mg/kg dose in ABC with extensive biomarkers analysis. Three cohorts of patients were included: Cohort 1 (HER2 over-expressing: HER2 3+ on immunohistochemistry (IHC) or HER2 IHC2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]+), Cohort 2 (HER2 low-expressing: IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-) and cohort 3 (HER2-nul: IHC0+). Biopsy of metastatic sites was performed: at baseline, on treatment (mandatory for cohort 1, optional for cohort 2/3) and at tumor progression; blood samples for ctDNA were collected at baseline. The primary endpoint was the Best Overall Response (BOR) in each cohort, according to the investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints were BOR by central assessment, clinical benefit rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results:185 women and 1 man were enrolled between November 2019 and March 2021. Among the patients enrolled in the safety population (see Table 1), median (range) age was 55 (24-82) years, all received at least one prior line of therapy and 12 patients were TN. Table 2 shows investigator-reported T-Dxd activity in the 3 cohorts at a median follow-up of 10.1 months [95%CI: 9.2-11.1]. A total of 170 patients (95%) had at least one treatment-related toxicity. Key grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia (10.6% of patients), fatigue (5.6%), leucopenia (4.5%), vomiting (4.5%) and anemia (3.4%). A total of 4 patients had drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (grade 1 in 3 patients and grade 2 in 1 patient), 11 patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. No drug-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: T-DXd showed clinically meaningful activity in patients with HER2-overexpressing ABC and interestingly also in those with HER2low and HER2-nul ABC. Safety profile was consistent with previous reports. 1.Modi S et al N Engl J Med 2020 2.Mosi S et al J Clin Oncol 2020

Table 1.Analysis populationsTotalCohort 1 (HER2 over-expressing)Cohort 2 (HER2 low-expressing)Cohort 3 (HER2 non-detected)Enrolled population186727440Safety population*179687338 (including 12 TN)Full analysis Set**176687236TN: Triple Negative. *: safety population = enrolled population except 7 patients who did not receive at least one dose of study drug. **: Full Analysis Set = safety population except 3 patients (2 who did not have a valid first post-baseline assessment of disease status or who did not have progressive disease and 1 who did not have at least one radiologically measurable lesion according to RECIST v1.1)

Table 2.T-DXd activity in the three cohorts according to investigator assessmentTotalCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3BOR confirmedn/N82/176 (46.6%)47/68 (69.1%)24/72 (33.3%)11/36 (30.6%)[95%CI][39.1; 54.2][56.7; 79.8][22.7; 45.4]16.3; 48.1]Median DORmonths7.69.97.66.8[95%CI][6.2; 9.7][5.4; NR][4.4; 8.7][2.8; 8.3]Median PFSmonths6.911.16.74.2[95%CI][6.7; 8.7][8.4; NR][4.6; 8.5][2.1; 6.9]NR: Not Reached

Citation Format: Véronique Diéras, Elise Deluche, Amélie Lusque, Barbara Pistilli, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Yves Pierga, Frédéric Viret, Christelle Levy, Laura Salabert, Fanny Le Du, Florence Dalenc, Christelle Jouannaud, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Xavier Durando, Thierry Petit, Céline Mahier - Aït Oukhatar, Thomas Filleron, Maria Fernanda Mosele, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Agnès Ducoulombier, Fabrice André. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for advanced breast cancer patients (ABC), regardless HER2 status: A phase II study with biomarkers analysis (DAISY) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-02.

Abstract PD9-08: Prognostic value of EndoPredict test in patients screened for UNIRAD, a UCBG randomized, double blind, phase III international trial evaluating the addition of everolimus (EVE) to adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) in women with high risk HR+, HER2- early breast cancer (eBC)

Background: The double blind randomized UNIRAD trial (NCT01805271) showed no evidence that adding Everolimus (EVE) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (EHT) for high-risk early breast cancer (BC) improved 3-year disease-free survival (iDFS) compared with EHT alone. In this trial, high risk was defined by any T and either ≥4N+, or ≥1N+ after neoadjuvant treatment, or ≥1N+ and EPclin high risk (EPCH) score ≥3.3. This sub analysis is aimed to verify prognostic added value of EndoPredict test results on outcomes in patients screened for the UNIRAD study.. Material and methods: From May 2015 to March 2020, 777 patients were screened with the EndoPredict test. Complete results were obtained for 767 of them. 662 pts were classified as EPCH and 429 were randomized in UNIRAD. 233 pts with EPCH and 105 pts with EPclin low risk (EPCL) were not randomized but followed up for iDFS. Statistical analysis: Kaplan-Meier estimates the association of the integrated molecular-clinico-pathologic EPclin score, and the 12-gene molecular EP score, with iDFS (primary endpoint) and dMFS (secondary endpoint). Independent prognostic added value of EPclin score was tested in a multivariate Cox model after adjusting on tumor characteristics (Grade and T, N). A two-sided p-value less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant, 95% confidence intervals reported with HR. Results: Median follow-up of the cohort was 36.6 mo (0-69) since EndoPredict test. As for the whole population, there was no significant difference in iDFS between treatment arms in the randomized EPCH group. On the other hand, EPclin was an independent prognostic factor for iDFS. 36 mo relapse rate from testing for patients in the EPCL group and the EPCH group was 0% and 7%, respectively (HR supposing continuous EPclin score: 2.36, 95%CI: 1.7-3.3, p &lt; .0001). This difference remained significant when assessed in a cox model with tumor size, number of positive nodes and tumor grade (HR: 1.96, 95%CI: 1.32-2.9, p=0.0008). Furthermore, EPclin results was independently correlated to distant metastatic free survival: 36 mo dMFS for patient in the EPCL and EPCH group was 100% and 94%, respectively (adjusted HR: 2.13, 95%CI:11.3-3.4, p = .0014). Of interest when assessing prognostic of patients within quartiles of EPclin Score (&lt;3.6; 3.6-4.1; ≥4.1-4.8; ≥ 4.8), 36 mo iDFS was 99%; 95%; 94% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion: These prospective results confirm the significance of EPclin score as an independent prognostic parameter in node positive ER+/HER2- eBC patients receiving standard adjuvant treatment. This information can be of importance for selection of specific adjuvant intervention, particularly chemotherapy and new targeted therapy. Further analysis on the EP score will be presented at the meeting.

Citation Format: Frederique Penault-Llorca, Florence Dalenc, Sylvie Chabaud, Paul Cottu, Djelila Allouache, David Cameron, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Julien Grenier, Laurence Venat Bouvet, Apurna Jegannathen, Mario Campone, Francesco Del Piano, Marc Debled, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Sylvie Giacchetti, Philippe Barthelemy, Laure Kaluzinski, Audrey Mailliez, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Eric Legouffe, Anne Cayre, Mathilde Martinez, Catherine Delbaldo, Delphine Mollon-Grange, E. Jane Macaskill, Matthew Sephton, Laëtitia Stefani, Blaha Belgadi, Matthew Winter, Hubert Orfeuvre, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Herve Bonnefoi, Judith Bliss, Jean-Luc Canon, Jerome Lemonnier, Fabrice Andre, Thomas Bachelot. Prognostic value of EndoPredict test in patients screened for UNIRAD, a UCBG randomized, double blind, phase III international trial evaluating the addition of everolimus (EVE) to adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) in women with high risk HR+, HER2- early breast cancer (eBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-08.

948 Final results from AIPAC: A phase IIb comparing eftilagimod alpha (a soluble LAG-3 protein) vs. placebo in combination with weekly paclitaxel in HR+ HER2- MBC

Background

Eftilagimod alpha (efti; IMP321) is a soluble LAG-3 protein (LAG-3Ig) that binds to a subset of MHC class II molecules and mediates activation of antigen-presenting cells followed by CD8 T-cells. Weekly paclitaxel is a standard of care chemo-regimen after failure of endocrine-based therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC). AIPAC (Active Immunotherapy PAClitaxel) investigated the addition of efti to weekly paclitaxel in these patients (pts).

Methods

This placebo-controlled, double-blinded, 1:1 randomized phase IIb trial enrolled pts with measurable disease, HR+ HER2- MBC after endocrine-based therapy. Pts received paclitaxel (80 mg/m² IV on D1, D8, D15) + efti (30 mg) or placebo on D2, D16 (every 2 weeks) for up to 24 weeks following efti/placebo for up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint (EP) was progression-free survival (RECIST1.1) by BICR. Secondary EPs included overall survival (OS), PFS (local read), overall response rate (ORR), biomarker, quality of life. Exploratory EPs included univariate/multivariate analyses.

Results

227 pts were randomized (Jan2017-Jul2019). All except 1 received ≥1 treatment and were included in the full analysis set [efti (n=114); placebo (n=112)]. Data cut-off was 14May2021 (min. follow-up= 22 months). Median age was 60 yrs with ECOG 0 in 61.5%. 91.6% had visceral disease. Pts were mostly endocrine resistant (84%) and partially pre-treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors (44.2%). Post-study treatment was similar. Median OS was 20.4 (95% CI: 14.3-25.1) months in the efti group vs. 17.5 (95% CI: 12.9-21.9) in the placebo group. HR was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.64-1.19; p=0.197). In predefined univariate analyses, younger pts, low baseline monocytes and luminal B showed significant/clinically meaningful improvement in OS (table 1).

Efti increased PBMC/T cell (CD4/CD8) count vs. placebo, correlating with improved OS (Spearman Rho=0.6, p=0.02 for CD8 T cells). In a whole population multivariate cox regression model, increasing BMI and prior treatment with CDK4/6 were independent significant poor prognostic markers for PFS and OS.

TEAEs leading to discontinuation were similar at 5.3%(efti) & 6.3%(placebo). PFS (Primary EP) and safety were reported at SABCS 2020 (Abstract#132).

Abstract 948 Table 1

Overall survival by subgroups at final analysis

Conclusions

Efti added to paclitaxel led to a non-significant 2.9 months median OS increase in HR+ HER2- MBC pts after endocrine-based therapy. Effects were significant in pts <65yrs, with low monocytes and more aggressive disease (luminal B). Efti increased circulating CD4/CD8 T cells, which significantly correlated to improved OS. Weekly paclitaxel + efti should be further investigated in MBC.

Trial Registration

The trial identifiers are IMP321-P011 (code for sponsor), 2015-002541-63 (EudraCT) and NCT02614833 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by relevant ethic committees and institutional review boards.

Analysis of the StoRM cohort reveals physical activity to be associated with survival in metastatic breast cancer

Benefits of physical activity are widely demonstrated for early stage cancers but few studies have focused on metastatic disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of physical activity on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. We conducted a secondary analysis of the national, multicentric, non-randomized, prospective cohort SNPs to Risk of Metastasis (StoRM) study. The level of physical activity was self-reported at inclusion and divided into three categories of physical activity: light level, moderate level, and vigorous level. Overall, 833 patients (56.2%) completed the physical activity questionnaire at baseline on average physical activity during the previous year: 11.6% had a light level of physical activity, 69.0% achieved moderate levels of physical activity and 19.3% reported vigorous levels of physical activity. After adjustment for confounding, physical activity was not statistically significantly associated with overall survival in the whole population. Subgroup analysis identified that both vigorous and moderate physical activity were associated with statistically significantly improved overall survival compared to light physical activity level only in the HER2 positive subgroup (HR 0.23; 95% CI 0.07-0.70, p = 0.01 and HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.96, p = 0.04). Physical activity done during the previous year was associated with survival in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients. These results suggest that overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients could be improved through physical activity which should be considered as a complementary intervention for these individuals. The study showed that moderate/vigorous levels of physical activity were associated with better overall survival, and that these associations remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis in the HER2 positive subgroup. These results have clinical relevance and justify the recommendations for physical activity interventions in metastatic breast cancer.

Decision of adjuvant chemotherapy in intermediate risk luminal breast cancer patients: A prospective multicenter trial assessing the clinical and psychological impact of EndoPredict® (EpClin) use (UCBG 2-14)

Purpose

Genomic tests can identify ER-positive HER2-negative localized breast cancer patients who may not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Such tests seem especially interesting in “intermediate” clinico-pathological risk categories. The psychological impact of the decision uncertainty in these women remains largely unexplored. We assessed the clinical and psychological impact of EndoPredict® (EpClin), a clinico-genomic test, in these patients.

Methods

This multicenter, single arm prospective study (NCT02773004) enrolled patients for which adjuvant chemotherapy was uncertain, based on predefined criteria. The primary endpoint was the proportion of change between initial adjuvant decision and final administration of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included post-test (Day 17) and 1-year patient reported outcomes.

Results

One third of 200 evaluable patients had a high EpClin score (≥3.32867; 10 years cumulative risk of distance failure ≥10%). The overall change rate of chemotherapy decision was 72/200 (35.8%, 95% CI 29.2–42.4). Chemotherapy was withdrawn in 57 cases (28.4% [22.2–34.8]) and added in 15 (7.5% [3.8–11.2]. 6 changes (8%) were based on patients’ decisions. Anxiety and distress levels increased at Day 17 when adding chemotherapy after the test result (p < 10⁻⁷ and 0.00022 respectively), while stable in other situations. At 1-year, all patients had returned to the baseline anxiety and distress levels (mean anxiety 51.5, +/− SD = 2.5 [max. 80], mean distress 3±1 [max. 10]).

Conclusions

EndoPredict ® (EpClin) is clinically useful in deciding whether or not to administer adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with intermediate risk. A single-step decision is preferable since adding chemotherapy at a later stage increases anxiety and distress.

•

EndoPredict ® (EpClin) allowed a chemotherapy decision modification in 35% of the patients included in the Adendom trial.

•

Patient-physician concertation is important: 8% of treatment changes are based on patients’ will.

•

A single-step decision including the test appears preferable to limit anxiety and distress.

6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in early breast cancer (PHARE): final analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised trial

BACKGROUND

In 2013, the interim analysis of the Protocol for Herceptin as Adjuvant therapy with Reduced Exposure (PHARE) trial could not show that 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab was non-inferior to 12 months. Here, we report the planned final analysis based on the prespecified number of occurring events.

METHODS

PHARE is an open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority randomised trial of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer comparing 6 months versus 12 months of trastuzumab treatment concomitant with or following standard neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The study was undertaken in 156 centres in France. Eligible patients were women aged 18 years or older with non-metastatic, operable, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast and either positive axillary nodes or negative axillary nodes but a tumour of at least 10 mm. Participants must have received at least four cycles of a chemotherapy for this breast cancer and have started receiving adjuvant trastuzumab-treatment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to either 6 months or 12 months of trastuzumab therapy duration between the third and sixth months of adjuvant trastuzumab. The randomisation was stratified by concomitant or sequential treatment with chemotherapy, oestrogen receptor status, and centre. The primary objective was non-inferiority in the intention-to-treat population in the 6-month group in terms of disease-free survival with a prespecified hazard margin of 1·15. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00381901.

FINDINGS

3384 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either 12 months (n=1691) or 6 months (n=1693) of adjuvant trastuzumab. One patient in the 12-month group and three patients in the 6-month group were excluded, so 1690 patients in each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At a median follow-up of 7·5 years (IQR 5·3-8·8), 704 events relevant to disease-free survival were observed (345 [20·4%] in the 12-month group and 359 [21·2%] in the 6-month group). The adjusted hazard ratio for disease-free survival in the 12-month group versus the 6-month group was 1·08 (95% CI 0·93-1·25; p=0·39). The non-inferiority margin was included in the 95% CI. No differences in effects pertaining to trastuzumab duration were found in any of the subgroups. After the completion of trastuzumab treatment, rare adverse events occurred over time and the safety analysis remained similar to the previously published report. In particular, we found no change in the cardiac safety comparison, and only three additional cases in which the left ventricular ejection fraction decreased to less than 50% have been reported in the 12-month group.

INTERPRETATION

The PHARE study did not show the non-inferiority of 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab. Hence, adjuvant trastuzumab standard duration should remain 12 months.

FUNDING

The French National Cancer Institute.

A GINECO randomized phase II assessing addition of an aromatase inhibitor to oral vinorelbine in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients

1043

Background: For ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), efficacy of endocrine therapy + chemotherapy combination remain an open question. We hypothesized that continuing ER targeted therapy after progression in combination with chemotherapy may improve disease control. The objective of the CHEOPS trial was to assess the benefit of adding aromatase inhibitor (AI) to metronomic chemotherapy,oral vinorelbine, 50mg/3 time a week (OV) for AI pre-treated, ER+/HER2- mBC patients. Methods: Eligible patients had to have progressed on endocrine therapy and one or two lines of chemotherapy. They were randomized between vinorelbine (OV) and vinorelbine + AI (OV+AI). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). To show an increase of median PFS (from 3.5 to 5.5 month, HR 0.636), with alpha = 5% and power = 80%, 130 evaluable patients were needed. Results: 121 patients were Included (OV = 61; OV+AI = 60). Median age was 68 (range: 49-87), Median time from metastatic diagnosis was 3.2 years (range 0 - 16.9). 109 patients (90%) had visceral metastases. They all had previously received an AI and had been treated with one line (N = 66, 54.5%), or 2 lines (N = 55, 45.5%) of chemotherapy. Median PFS was increased from 2.3 months with OV to 3.7 months with OV+AI, but this difference was not significant (HR 0.73 [95 % CI 0.50-1.06], log-rank test: P = 0.09) 81 patients (67%) had at least one adverse event (AE) of grade ≥ 3 (40 (66%) for OV vs 41 (68%) for OV+AI). The most common grade ≥ 3 AE were: GT gammas (23%), neutropenia (18%), arterial hypertension and lymphopenia (17%). The occurrence of 3 toxic deaths (OV = 1; OV+AI = 2) secondary to febrile aplasia motivated the early cessation of this clinical trial. 9 patients (5 OV (10%) and 4 OV+AI (8%) presented an objective complete or partial response. Conclusions: The addition of AI to OV over OV alone in AI resistant mBC was associated with a non-significant improvement of PFS, but both PFS are lower than expected. Metronomic OV schedule, at 50 mg three times a week, requires close biological monitoring. The question of hormonal treatment and chemotherapy combination remains open. Clinical trial information: EudraCT Number: 2015-000401-39.

mTORC1 activation assessed in metastatic sample to predict outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with everolimus-exemestan: Results from the SAFIRTOR study

1024

Background: Using samples from TAMRAD study (Treilleux, Ann Oncol, 2015), we previously reported that p4EBP1, a downstream protein of mTOR, was associated with higher benefit to everolimus (eve). SAFIRTOR study was designed to validate clinical utility of this biomarker. Methods: Patients (pts) with ER+, HER2 negative, AI resistant MBC were prospectively included (NCT02444390). All pts had a biopsy of a metastatic site and were then treated with standard eve + exemestane (exe) combination. The primary end point was to validate that p4EBP1 expression is associated with longer PFS in patients treated with eve. 120 evaluable pts were needed for the pre planed statistical analysis. All samples were collected and processed in a standardized procedure in order to allow phophoproteins IHC staining. In addition to p4EBP1, we explored prognostic value of pS6K, pAkt, PTEN and LKB1, together with genomic alterations assessed by NGS and CGH arrays. Results: 150 pts were included, 30 pts had no adequate sample, and further 13 had missing clinical data, 107 were evaluable for primary objective. Median age was 62, they had previously progressed on AI treatment, either in the adjuvant (22 pts) or the metastatic setting (83 pts). 20 were considered as primary hormone resistant, 87 as secondary resistant. The median Allread score for p4EBP1 was 5.5 (range: 0-6.5). Analysis of the primary endpoint showed that p4EBP1 staining above the median is associated with a longer PFS on eve+exe. (median PFS: 9.3 months, 95CI 6.3-13.1 for high p4EBP1 versus 5.8 months, 95CI 3.7-7.8 for low p4EBP1, p = 0.02). Prognostic value of high pEBP1 remained significant when assessed in a multivariate analysis along classical clinico-biological prognostic factors for MBC (HR 0.57, 95%CI 0.38-0.88, p = 0.01). In this AI resistant population, the tumor of 42 (46%), 33 (35%) and 5 (5.3%) pts carried an activating mutation for ESR1, PIK3CA and AKT1, respectively. None of these mutational statuses were correlated to outcome. Conclusions: This prospective study validates p4EBP1 expression analysis to select patients most likely to benefit from everolimus + exemestane. Clinical trial information: NCT02444390.

Prognosis value of a genetic score based on germline genetic variants in a prospective cohort of early triple-negative breast cancer patients

1529

Background: Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with poor outcome. In this study, the association between germline genetic variants and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was analyzed in TNBC patients. Methods: A genome wide-association study (GWAS) aimed to identify variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms – SNPs) associated with prognosis in 1121 patients with TNBC in the SIGNAL prospective cohort. Associations between gene variants and iDFS were assessed in univariate Cox regression models. Variants were combined in a score to identify risk categories. A prognostic model based on breast cancer stage and genetic variants was estimated using a multivariate Cox regression. Interaction between stage and genetic score was tested. Discrimination of the model was assessed by the Harrell’s C statistic and internal validity by bootstrap method. Results: The characteristics of the 1121 patients were representative of a population with early TNBC. Four SNPs on chromosomes 9 and 2 were found significantly associated to iDFS in univariate Cox models. Homozygous status for the most frequent allele was associated with poorer iDFS for two SNPs and this status was present in 50% and 57% of the population. For the two other SNPs, the most frequent allele was associated with more favorable iDFS. Three prognostic categories were derived from the genetic score. The following table presents the results from the multivariate Cox model including genetic score and disease stage. Clinical trial information: RECF1098. Conclusions: In a prospective cohort of 1121 patients with early TNBC, 4 genetic variants (SNPs) were associated with iDFS. A score involving SNPs provided similar prognostic indications as breast cancer stages. A search assessing the function and the role of the involved genes is ongoing.[Table: see text]

[LHRH analogs in adjuvant endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal localized breast cancers: Ending the controversy for novel guidelines?]

Endocrine treatment represents the cornerstone of endocrine-sensitive pre-menopausal early breast cancer. The estrogen blockade plays a leading role in the therapeutic management with surgery, radiotherapy and selective antiestrogen treatment. For several years, selective estrogen receptor modulators, such as tamoxifen, have revolutionized medical care of hormone receptors-positive breast cancer and have conquered the therapeutic arsenal while becoming the gold standard of treatment. Other combinations associating the ovarian function suppression using LHRH agonists with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors have been recently investigated, leading to mitigated opinions regarding the clinical benefit of these associations. We propose here a comprehensive overview on existing data and their actualization concerning LHRH analogues, whilst emphasizing benefit-risk balance for this targeted population.

[Oligometastatic breast cancer : therapeutic implications of a new paradigm]

INTRODUCTION

Oligometastatic breast cancer incidence is recently increasing thanks to screening and imaging improvements. Unlike patients with metastatic disease, a small number of oligometastatic patients may expect a definitive remission, in case of aggressive management performed with intent to cure. We report the atypical evolution of an oligometastatic breast cancer patient, who lately relapsed with a different Her2 status.

RESULTS

A 46 year old women was treated for an infiltrating duct breast carcinoma, initially diagnosed with oligometastases and an Her2- negative status. Treatments were performed in intent to cure but the patient relapsed 5 years later with a solitary Her2-positive liver metastasis. The aggressive local and systemic (using an anti- Her2 targeted therapy) management induced a still complete remission at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Prognosis of breast oligometastatic cancer is unpredictable, but an aggressive with intent-to-cure management may bring benefits to patients. However very rare, the switch of Her2 status between initial diagnosis and relapse highlights tumor heterogeneity, and the fact that a cell population featuring targetable characteristics may appear due to anticancer drug induced-cell selection.

GWAS in the SIGNAL/PHARE clinical cohort restricts the association between the FGFR2 locus and estrogen receptor status to HER2-negative breast cancer patients

Genetic polymorphisms are associated with breast cancer risk. Clinical and epidemiological observations suggest that clinical characteristics of breast cancer, such as estrogen receptor or HER2 status, are also influenced by hereditary factors. To identify genetic variants associated with pathological characteristics of breast cancer patients, a Genome Wide Association Study was performed in a cohort of 9365 women from the French nationwide SIGNAL/PHARE studies (NCT00381901/RECF1098). Strong association between the FGFR2 locus and ER status of breast cancer patients was observed (ER-positive n=6211, ER-negative n=2516; rs3135718 OR=1.34 p=5.46×10-12). This association was limited to patients with HER2-negative tumors (ER-positive n=4267, ER-negative n=1185; rs3135724 OR=1.85 p=1.16×10-11). The FGFR2 locus is known to be associated with breast cancer risk. This study provides sound evidence for an association between variants in the FGFR2 locus and ER status among breast cancer patients, particularly among patients with HER2-negative disease. This refinement of the association between FGFR2 variants and ER-status to HER2-negative disease provides novel insight to potential biological and clinical influence of genetic polymorphisms on breast tumors.

Improving Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Through a Therapeutic Educational Approach: A Feasibility Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To develop and test the feasibility of a tailored therapeutic educational program, with the aim of improving adherence to oral endocrine adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. 
.

DESIGN

A qualitative study to identify educational needs and a feasibility study assessing the efficacy of the program.
.

SETTING

A comprehensive cancer center, the Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute in Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France.
.

SAMPLE

Two consecutive samples (N = 11, N = 6) of women taking adjuvant oral endocrine chemotherapy for breast cancer. 
.

METHODS

A mixed qualitative and quantitative method was used. The participants' representations of disease and treatment were explored through one-on-one interviews and then translated into educational needs, which were used to develop a tailored therapeutic education program. The pilot study evaluated the reach and efficacy using before-and-after comparisons. 
.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Educational objectives, knowledge, trust in the treatment, and anxiety.
.

FINDINGS

Five educational objectives (acquiring knowledge, improving communication skills, managing anxiety, managing side effects, and improving adherence) were identified through 11 interviews. A three-session program was developed. Eight of the 23 patients invited to participate in a pilot study accepted, and six completed the intervention. Knowledge improved from 38.9 of 100 preintervention to 69.4 of 100 postintervention (p = 0.045). Trust in treatment showed a trend to improvement from 5.5 of 10 to 8 of 10 (p = 0.14), but anxiety did not change significantly; anxiety went from 6 to 7 (p = 0.88).
.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from the feasibility study showed promising efficacy for the educational objectives and provided information about how the program could be improved. 
.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Tailored educational programs conducted by trained nurses may help patients to adhere to and live with the effects of endocrine therapy.

Assessment of the prognostic role of a 94-single nucleotide polymorphisms risk score in early breast cancer in the SIGNAL/PHARE prospective cohort: no correlation with clinico-pathological characteristics and outcomes

Background

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have to date identified 94 genetic variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) associated with risk of developing breast cancer. A score based on the combined effect of the 94 risk alleles can be calculated to measure the global risk of breast cancer. We aimed to test the hypothesis that the 94-SNP-based risk score is associated with clinico-pathological characteristics, breast cancer subtypes and outcomes in early breast cancer.

Methods

A 94-SNP risk score was calculated in 8703 patients in the PHARE and SIGNAL prospective case cohorts. This score is the total number of inherited risk alleles based on 94 selected SNPs. Clinical data and outcomes were prospectively registered. Genotyping was obtained from a GWAS.

Results

The median 94-SNP risk score in 8703 patients with early breast cancer was 77.5 (range: 58.1–97.6). The risk score was not associated with usual prognostic and predictive factors (age; tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) status; Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade; inflammatory features; estrogen receptor status; progesterone receptor status; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status) and did not correlate with breast cancer subtypes. The 94-SNP risk score did not predict outcomes represented by overall survival or disease-free survival.

Conclusions

In a prospective case cohort of 8703 patients, a risk score based on 94 SNPs was not associated with breast cancer characteristics, cancer subtypes, or patients’ outcomes. If we hypothesize that prognosis and subtypes of breast cancer are determined by constitutional genetic factors, our results suggest that a score based on breast cancer risk-associated SNPs is not associated with prognosis.

Trial registration

PHARE cohort: NCT00381901, Sept. 26, 2006 – SIGNAL cohort: INCa RECF1098, Jan. 28, 2009

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0888-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Constitutional variants are not associated with HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the SIGNAL/PHARE clinical cohort

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer is a subtype of interest regarding its outcome and the impressive impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeted therapy. Constitutional variants may be involved in the aetiology of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, and we propose a case–case study to test the hypothesis that single nucleotide polymorphisms may be associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. A Genome-Wide Association Study was used in a cohort of 9836 patients from the SIGNAL/PHARE study (NCT00381901-RECF1098). The main goal was to identify variants specifically related to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. A two-staged genotyping strategy was carried out to cover as large a proportion of the genome as possible. All subjects were genotyped using the Illumina HumanCore Exome chip set. Principal Components Analysis and k-means were then used to characterize the ancestry of the participants. A random sample of subjects from the main “European” cluster was genotyped with the Omni5 chip set. These data were then used to impute missing genotypes from the remaining subjects genotyped only using the HumanCore Exome array. From the 9836 patients, a total of 8703 cases including 3230 patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer were analyzed. Despite having 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 1.23 in this population, no variant achieved genome-wide significance for association with the occurrence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer vs. any other subtype of breast tumour. Our study was unable to identify constitutional polymorphisms that are strongly associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive status among breast cancer patients.

A large gene-finding study failed to identify any hereditary factors linked to HER2 expression among women with breast cancer. A team in France led by Xavier Pivot from the University Hospital Center of Besançon, France, analyzed more than 500,000 single DNA letters from a cohort of 8703 patients with breast cancer, 3230 of whom had tumors with high expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and are thus treated with for anti-HER2 targeted therapies. The researchers searched for DNA variants associated with HER2 status, but none reached the threshold for statistical significance. The findings reveal a high level of genetic diversity in women with HER2-positive breast cancer and suggest that HER2 amplification may have more to do with the intrinsic nature of the tumor than with the genetics of the patient.

Superimposable outcomes for sequential and concomitant administration of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: Results from the SIGNAL/PHARE prospective cohort

AIM

Adjuvant clinical trials in early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer have assessed either sequential or concomitant incorporation of trastuzumab with chemotherapy; only the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG)-N9831 trial prospectively compared both modalities. In routine trastuzumab has been incorporated into a concurrent regimen with taxane chemotherapy instead of sequential modality on the basis of a positive risk-benefit ratio. This present study assessed sequential versus concomitant administration of adjuvant trastuzumab.

METHODS

A population combining patients from Protocol for Herceptin^® as Adjuvant therapy with Reduced Exposure (PHARE) a randomised phase III clinical trial (NCT00381901) and SIGNAL (RECF1098) a prospective study specifically designed for Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) analyses was studied. In this cohort with 58 months of median follow-up, the comparison in the HER2-positive group of adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy modalities was based on a propensity score methodology. Treatment modalities were based on physician's choice and comparisons adjustment were made by a propensity score methodology. Overall Survival (OS) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons between groups were based on the log rank test.

RESULTS

The SIGNAL/PHARE cohort included 11,728 breast cancer cases treated in adjuvant setting; some 5502 of them with HER2-positive tumour: 34.5% (1897/5502) were treated by sequential and 65.5% (3605/5502) by concomitant modality of administration for taxane-chemotherapy and trastuzumab. The adjusted comparison found similar OS (HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.86-1.19) and similar DFS (HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.96-1.21).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the sequential administration of trastuzumab given after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy might be as valid as the concomitant administration of trastuzumab and taxane chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting.

Abstract OT1-04-07: VICTORIANE: A randomized phase 3 study assessing the addition of oral vinorelbine to aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer

Background : The addition of anti-proliferative agents such new inhibitors of CDK4/6 to hormonotherapy have significantly improved the efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Oral vinorelbine provided the opportunity to give new schedules of chemotherapy with favourable tolerability and prolonged exposure. The present trial was designed to evaluate the clinical effects of the addition of oral vinorelbine to aromatase inhibitors in first line treatment for MBC.

Methods : In this phase III, randomized, prospective, open trial named VICTORIANE (NCT02730091), postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2– with MBC are randomized (1:1) between letrozole or anastrozole once a day (Arm A) versus oral vinorelbine 50 mg three times a every week with letrozole or anastrozole (Arm B). Continuous daily schedule (days 1-28 of each 28 days cycle) is planned until disease progression or discontinuation for other reasons. A minimisation algorithm was used stratifying treatment allocation according to the existence of visceral metastases, prior adjuvant hormonal treatment and centers. The study is conducted in compliance with the principles of good clinical practice and the declaration of Helsinki.

Key inclusion criteria include, histologicaly proven HER2-negative and Estrogen Receptor-positive breast cancer, metastatic setting, no prior systemic anti-cancer therapy for MBC, recurrence after prior hormonal therapy in the adjuvant setting is allowed if disease free interval is greater than 24 months from the completion of treatment, normal liver, bone marrow and renal functions, Performans status greater than 2. Non inclusion criteria include symptomatic visceral disease, or disease burden precluding endocrine therapy, and prior therapy with vinorelbine.

The primary endpoints is progression-free survival (PFS; local assessment, RECIST v1.1) and secondaries endpoints are overall survival, health-related quality of life, overall response rate and safety. Analysis of the primary endpoint will be performed with a stratified log-rank test (95% confidence interval). A 30 percent reduction in the risk of events (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.70) was assumed under H1 in the arm B. This reduction was estimated based on an absolute gain of 3.857 months in terms of median PFS, from 9 months (arm A) to 12.857 months (arm B). Global recruitment of the planned 340 pts is ongoing and should be completed in march 2018. Final results will be expected in 2019.

Citation Format: Villanueva CB, Barthelemy P, Ferrero JM, Jacquin JP, Bonnetain F, Mansi L, Pivot X. VICTORIANE: A randomized phase 3 study assessing the addition of oral vinorelbine to aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-04-07.

Social inequalities and cancer: can the European deprivation index predict patients' difficulties in health care access? a pilot study

Context

The European Deprivation Index (EDI), is a new ecological estimate for Socio-Economic Status (SES). This study postulates that Time-To-Treatment could be used as a cancer quality-of -care surrogate in order to identify the association between cancer patient's SES and quality of care in a French comprehensive cancer center.

Methods

retrospective mono-centered cohort study. All consecutive incoming adult patients diagnosed for breast cancer(BC), prostate cancer(PC), colorectal cancer (CRC), lung cancer(LC) or sarcoma(S) were included between January 2013 and December 2013. The association of EDI and Time-To-Diagnosis(TTD), as well as Time-To-Treatment(TTT) was analyzed using a cox regression, and a strata analysis per tumor site was performed.

Results

969 patients were included. Primitive tumor site was 505 BC(52%), 169 PC(17%), 145 LC(15%), 116 CRC(12%), and 34 S(4%). Median TTD was 1.41 months (Q1-Q3 0.5 to 3.5 months). Median TTT was 0.9 months (0.4 - 1.4). In a multivariate analysis, we identified the tumor site as a predictive factor to influence TTD, shorter for BC (0.75months, [0.30- 1.9]) than PC (4.69 months [1.6-29.7]), HR 0.27 95%CI= [0.22-0.34], p < 0.001. TTT was also shorter for BC (0.75months [0.4-1.1]) than PC (2.02 [0.9-3.2]), HR 0.32 95%CI= [0.27-0.39], p < 0.001. EDI quintiles were not found associated with either TTT or TTD.

Conclusions

Deprivation estimated by the EDI does not appear to be related to an extension of the Time-to-Diagnosis or Time-to-Treatment in our real-life population. Further research should be done to identify other frailty-sensitive factors that could be responsible for delays in care.

[Breast cancer screening: On our way to the future]

Breast cancer remains a potentially lethal disease, which requires aggressive treatments and is associated with long-term consequences. Its prognosis is linked to both tumor biology and burden at diagnosis. Although treatments have allowed important improvements in prognosis over the past 20 years, breast cancer screening remains necessary. Mammographic screening allows earlier stage diagnoses and a decrease of breast cancer specific mortality. However, breast cancer screening modalities should be revised with the objective to address demonstrated limitations of mammographic screening (limited benefit, imperfect sensitivity and specificity, overdiagnoses, radiation-induced morbidity). Furthermore, both objective and perceived performances of screening procedures should be improved. Numerous large international efforts are ongoing, leading to scientific progresses that should have rapid clinical implications in this area. Among them is improvement of imaging techniques performance, development of real time diagnosis, and development of new non radiological screening techniques such as the search for circulating tumor DNA, development of biomarkers able to allow precise risk evaluation and stratified screening. As well, overtreatment is currently addressed by biomarker-based de-escalation clinical trials. These advances need to be associated with strong societal support, as well as major paradigm changes regarding the way health and cancer prevention is perceived by individuals.

Radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer in nonagenarian patients: a framework for new paradigms

No consensus exists regarding the role of radiotherapy in the management of gynecologic cancer in nonagenarian patients. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 19 consecutive nonagenarian patients with gynecologic cancer (6 endometrial cancers, 6 cervical cancers, 4 vulvar cancers, and 3 vaginal cancers) who were treated with radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was performed mainly in a palliative setting (n = 12; 63.2%), with a median dose of 45 Gy (range, 6-76 Gy). Infrequent major acute or late toxicities were reported. Among 19 patients, 9 (47.4%) experienced tumor progression, 5 (26.3%) experienced complete response, 2 (10.5%) experienced stable disease and/or partial response. At last follow-up, 12 patients (63.2%) had died; most deaths (n = 9) occurred because of the cancer. These results suggest that radiotherapy is feasible in the treatment of nonagenarian patients with gynecologic cancer.

[Perception of adverse reactions of chemotherapy and hormone therapy by women treated for breast cancer]

INTRODUCTION

In Europe, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. His treatment (TTT) can have a significant impact on daily life.

AIMS

Explore the experienced short-term side effects (SE) of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy by women themselves, the information delivered and the place of the general practitioner (GP).

METHOD

Qualitative study by individual interview, conducted from January to May 2015, with 14 women followed for no metastatic breast cancer after chemotherapy and possible initiation of hormone therapy, at the Cancer Institute of the Loire (France).

RESULTS

The SE of chemotherapy, except vomiting, have appeared very trying (fatigue, pains oral and cutaneous involvement), punctuated and accentuated by the cures. They were resounding on daily life, requiring family or professional assistance. Falling dander, considered stigmatizing, violated the person and femininity. The women have estimated to be well informed. They had appreciated the initial response of the pivot nurse. The least expected SE of hormone therapy, hot flashes and articular pains might limit activities. To counteract these side effects, mostly accepted to prevent recidivism, a remedy for complementary therapies was frequent. The GP was solicited for some SE, sometimes for complementary medicine (CM).

CONCLUSION

Over the cures, women suggested support meetings, a more sustainable action of the pivot nurse, a better attention to their complaints and a more personalized information. The development of TTT less EI provider was desired. The effect of CM on SE should be explored.

Real-World Outcomes of Combination Chemotherapy with Trabectedin plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

Background: Trabectedin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) proved efficacious as second-line treatment for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Methods: We report a single-center retrospective analysis of the efficacy and tolerance of trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2 every 3 weeks in a cohort of real-life ROC patients. Results: From February 2012 to January 2014, 17 patients were treated with trabectedin alone or combined with PLD. Median age was 61 years (range: 48-78). Performance status was 0-1 in 16 patients (94%). Disease response rate was 53% and disease control rate was 76%. At the end of the follow-up, 8 patients (47%) were alive. Median overall survival was 17.6 months (95% CI 13.6 to not reached). Median progression-free survival was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.4-10.0). The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (n = 4, 24%) and nausea/vomiting (n = 4, 24%). Conclusion: Trabectedin combined with PLD seems efficient in and well tolerated by real-life ROC patients.

6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHARE): a randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Since 2005, 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab has been the standard treatment for patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer. However, the optimum duration of treatment has been debated. We did a non-inferiority trial of a shorter exposure of 6 months versus the standard 12 months of trastuzumab for patients with early breast cancer.

METHODS

We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial in 156 centres in France. Patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who had received at least four cycles of chemotherapy, had breast-axillary surgery, and had received up to 6 months of trastuzumab (administered by intravenous infusions over 30-90 min every 3 weeks; initial loading dose 8 mg/kg; 6 mg/kg thereafter) before randomisation were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned via central randomisation procedure with web-based software to continue trastuzumab for another 6 months (12 months total duration; control group) or to discontinue trastuzumab at 6 months (6 months total duration; experimental group). Randomisation was stratified by concomitant or sequential administration of trastuzumab with chemotherapy, oestrogen-receptor status, and centre using a minimisation algorithm. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1·15. Analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00381901.

FINDINGS

1691 patients were randomly assigned to receive 12 months of trastuzumab and 1693 to receive 6 months of trastuzumab; 1690 patients in each group were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. After a median follow-up of 42·5 months (IQR 30·1-51·6), 175 disease-free survival events were noted in the 12-month group and 219 in the 6-month group. 2-year disease-free survival was 93·8% (95% CI 92·6-94·9) in the 12-month group and 91·1% (89·7-92·4) in the 6-month group (hazard ratio 1·28, 95% CI 1·05-1·56; p=0·29). 119 (93%) of the 128 cardiac events (clinical or based on assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction) occurred while patients were receiving trastuzumab. Significantly more patients in the 12-month group experienced a cardiac event than did those in the 6-month group (96 [5·7%] of 1690 patients vs 32 [1·9%] of 1690 patients, p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

After 3·5 years follow-up, we failed to show that 6 months of treatment with trastuzumab was non-inferior to 12 months of trastuzumab. Despite the higher rates of cardiac events, 12 months of adjuvant trastuzmab should remain the standard of care.

FUNDING

French National Cancer Institute.

Impact of geriatric risk factors on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin tolerance and efficacy in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients: final results of the DOGMES multicentre GINECO trial

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast cancer chemotherapy in the elderly is considered effective in carefully selected patients, but there is little data regarding its effect in vulnerable patients.

METHODS

We evaluated tumour response (primary endpoint), feasibility and outcomes after six courses of an adapted dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) (40 mg/m(2) every 28 days) as first-line chemotherapy for hormone-resistant MBC.

RESULTS

Of 60 patients >70 years (median 77 years), 15% had performance status ≥2 and 73% had visceral metastases. Geriatric assessment included: ≥2 comorbidities, 42%; ≥1 deficiency in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), 10% and Instrumental ADL (IADL), 82%; living in residential homes, 12%; albumin <35 g/L, 17%; body mass index (BMI) <21, 20%; depression, 17%; and lymphocytes ≤1 × 10(3)/mm(3), 27%. Complete response, partial response and stable disease were observed in 5%, 15% and 60%, respectively, but only 48% completed six cycles. Treatment discontinuations were mostly due to disease progression (18%) and non-haematological (NH) toxicities (22%). Eight patients died during treatment (three possibly related to PLD), and 15 had unplanned hospital admissions. Exploratory analyses to identify geriatric covariates associated with treatment outcomes revealed severe haematological toxicities significantly correlated with lymphocytes ≤1 × 10(3)/mm(3). NH toxicities correlated with age ≥80 years and living in residential homes. Progression-free survival (median 6.1 months) decreased with age, deficiency in IADL, cardiac dysfunction and living in residential homes. Overall survival (median 15.7 months) also decreased with living in residential homes.

CONCLUSION

Despite manageable haematological toxicities and expected response rates, PLD feasibility was poor in unselected elderly patients.

Cetuximab in combination with docetaxel (T) in patients with operable, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Preliminary results of a multicentre neoadjuvant pilot phase II study

1057

Background: Cetuximab is an antiboby targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to which a role has been suggested in TNBC. Therefore, we evaluated the combination of docetaxel with cetuximab as neoadjuvant therapy of operable TNBC. Methods: 35 patients with stage II-IIIA disease were prospectively included in this multicentre pilot study. Systemic therapy (ST) consisted of 6 cycles of T (100 mg/m2) q.3 weeks, in combination with weekly cetuximab (first dose : 400mg/m², then : 250 mg/m²/week) for 6 cycles. All patients underwent surgery at completion of ST. Complete pathologic response (pCR) was the primary endpoint (Sataloff : J Am Coll Surg 1995 ; Chevallier : Am J Clin Oncol 1993), with toxicity and biologic ancillary studies as secondary endpoints. Results: Patients characterisctics are as follows : mean age 48 [28-67] ; T1 : 3%, T2 : 73%, T3 : 24% (mean tumor size : 40 mm [15-100]) ; N0 : 61% and N1-N2 : 39%; invasive ductal carcinoma : 100%; Scarff-Bloom-Richardson Grade III : 73%, grade II : 27%. The median number of cycles was : T : 6 [1-6], cetuximab : 15 [1-18]. Pathological complete response was 24% according to Chevallier and Sataloff’s classifications and 28% if we consider response in breast. Preliminary results on 23 patients show an overall clinical response rate of 57% (22% CR). Conservative surgery was performed in 75% of cases. Skin toxicity was the main side-effect : grade II : 39%, grade III : 36%, grade IV : 3%. Neutropenia grade IV : 12.7%, febrile neutropenia : 1.3%, infection : 0%. Hand-foot syndrome grade III : 3%, grade II : 3%. Ungueal toxicity grade III : 3%, grade II : 33%. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that cetuximab in combination with Tappears to have a modest efficacy in operable TNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT00600249.

Reappraisal of the role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of ovarian cancer: a single institutional experience

The peritoneal carcinomatosis of ovarian cancer led to the development of optimal cytoreduction surgery completed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The main goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, tolerance and efficacy of this technique in patients with ovarian cancer. A retrospective monocentric study has evaluated 43 patients with HIPEC procedures from 1995 to 2009. After a complete cytoreduction surgery, a HIPEC procedure with cisplatin is performed. Data on complications and survival parameters were collected. Prognostic factors were also analyzed. Post-surgery complications included one death due to a septic shock (2.3%) and six patients have presented major complications (13.9%). The median of overall survival and progression free survival were 53.6 and 39 months, respectively. Patients with a primary complete surgical cytoreduction of the peritoneal carcinomatosis presented overall survival length of 131 months versus 84 months without initial complete resection (P < 0.0001). Surgical cytoreduction combined with HIPEC is a feasible procedure with acceptable morbid-mortality rates. The initial complete resection of the peritoneal carcinomatosis significantly increases survival and represents a strong prognostic factor.

Recommendations for a lifestyle which could prevent breast cancer and its relapse: physical activity and dietetic aspects

External factors such as eating habits and physical activity have an important impact on breast cancer risk. This paper reviews the literature on the relationship between breast cancer and lifestyle. It aims to produce recommendations regarding physical activity and dietary intake for clinical practice. Although strong clinical evidence of the impact of lifestyle modifications is still lacking, practising healthy eating should be encouraged for the prevention of cancer, its occurrence or relapse. Physical activity is recommended to avoid excessive weight gain. For example, the beneficial effects on the risk of breast cancer could be achieved by walking half an hour per day. Three to five hours per week of moderate physical exercise therefore should be recommended for optimising the reduction of the risk of cancer. For most women, moderate to intense activity, such as heavy housework, brisk walking, or dancing, could provide an effective level of activity to keep reduce the risk of breast cancer.

Estimation of the risk for nutritional state degradation in patients with cancer: development of a screening tool based on results from a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

In routine practice, the evaluation of the nutritional status of patients with cancer is not always performed although there is frequent modification as disease progresses. The validated screening and evaluation tools currently available are time-consuming and costly. In this study we analysed factors that could be used to identify patients likely to need nutritional surveillance or intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was carried out for 2 weeks in June 2006 on 477 patients with cancer.

RESULTS

30.2% of the patients had lost more than 10% of their body weight since the start of the illness. After adjustment, the factors significantly associated with weight loss were: depressive state (OR = 3.49; P = 0.002), digestive or ENT tumours (OR = 3.20; P = <0.001), chemotherapy (OR = 2.66; P = 0.011), male gender (OR = 2.30; P = 0.001) and professional status (OR = 2.08; P = 0.02). Using a logistic model, we calculated the risk of weight loss as a function of the presence of the identified predictive factors.

CONCLUSION

We report a simple screening tool, which will not replace the available evaluation methods but will enable targeting of the patients most likely, after a specific evaluation, to benefit from nutritional intervention. This remains to be validated in further prospective studies.

A phase-III trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel versus doxorubicin and paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: results of the ERASME 3 study

PURPOSE

In first-line metastatic breast cancer, both paclitaxel (P)-doxorubicin (A) and docetaxel (D)-doxorubicin (A) combinations have shown superiority over treatments without taxane. The aim of this study was to compare the two combinations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive (except for adjuvant therapy) metastatic breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to intravenous AD (arm D) or AP (arm P) every 3 weeks for a maximum of four cycles, then four cycles of single agent docetaxel (arm D) or paclitaxel (arm P). Primary endpoint was overall quality of life (QoL) measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 after four courses of doxorubicin-taxane combination. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and QoL sub-scores.

RESULTS

Between March 2000 and April 2004, 210 patients were randomized: 103 to arm P and 107 to arm D. Patient characteristics were well balanced between arms. After four courses, QoL score differences between groups or compared to baseline scores were not significant. Response rate was 39.6% for AD and 41.8% for AP. After a median follow-up of 50.2 months, median PFS and median OS were 8.7 and 21.4 months in arm D and 8.0 and 27.3 months in arm P (p = 0.977 and 0.081, respectively). Hematological toxicity was significantly more frequent in arm D than in arm P (p < 10(-6)), as well as grades 3-4 asthenia (p = 0.03). Neuropathy occurred more frequently in arm P (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

In this study, paclitaxel or docetaxel combined with doxorubicin were not significantly different in terms of QoL scores and efficacy, but had different toxicity profiles.

Randomized trial comparing six versus three cycles of epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal, node-positive breast cancer patients: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 01 trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the duration and dose intensity of epirubicin-based regimens in premenopausal patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1986 and 1990, 621 patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil (Roche SA, Basel, Switzerland) 500 mg/m2, epirubicin (Pharmacia SA, Milan, Italy) 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide (Asta Medica AG, Frankfurt, Germany) 500 mg/m2 every 21 days (FEC 50) for six cycles (6 FEC 50); FEC 50 for three cycles (3 FEC 50); or the same regimen with epirubicin 75 mg/m2 (FEC 75) for three cycles (3 FEC 75). All patients in the three arms received chest wall irradiation at the end of the third cycle.

RESULTS

After a 131-month median follow-up, the 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 53.4%, 42.5%, and 43.6% (P =.05) in the three arms, respectively. Pairwise comparisons demonstrate that 6 FEC 50 was superior both to 3 FEC 50 (P =.02) and to 3 FEC 75 (P =.05). The 10-year overall survival (OS) for the 6 FEC 50 arm was 64.3%, for the 3 FEC 50 arm it was 56.6%, and for the 3 FEC 75 arm, it was 59.7% (P =.25), respectively. Pairwise comparisons demonstrate that 6 FEC 50 was more effective than 3 FEC 50 (P =.10). Cox regression analysis demonstrates that OS was significantly better in the 6 FEC 50 than in the 3 FEC 50 arm (P =.046). No severe infections (grade 3 to 4), acute cardiac toxicity, or deaths from toxicity have been observed. Only five patients developed delayed cardiac dysfunctions, and three patients developed acute myeloblastic leukemia.

CONCLUSION

After a long-term follow-up in an adjuvant setting, the benefit of six cycles of FEC 50 compared with three cycles, whatever the dose, is highly significant in terms of DFS. As regards OS, the group receiving six cycles of FEC 50 has significantly better results than the group receiving three cycles of FEC 50.

Low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparin) and very low doses of warfarin in the prevention of upper extremity thrombosis in cancer patients with indwelling long-term central venous catheters: a pilot randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Upper extremity thrombosis is a major complication of central venous catheters implanted for chemotherapy in cancer patients. Vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparins have been recommended in this setting, but their relative benefit-to-risk ratios have never been compared.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized, open, parallel-group, multicenter trial was performed comparing the antithrombotic efficacy and safety of warfarin and the low-molecular-weight heparin, nadroparin, in cancer patients who had undergone central venous catheter implantation. Warfarin was given orally at a fixed daily dose of 1 mg and nadroparin was injected subcutaneously at a fixed daily dose of 2,850 IU for 90 days, or until venographically-confirmed thrombosis occurred. The primary efficacy outcome was the occurrence of upper extremity thrombosis confirmed by venography performed 90 days after insertion of the catheter, or earlier if symptoms of thrombosis had appeared. Safety end-points were bleeding and thrombocytopenia.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were included in the study. A total of 21 and 24 patients in the nadroparin and warfarin groups, respectively, were evaluable for primary efficacy. Six out of the 21 patients in the nadroparin group (28.6%) and 4 out of the 24 patients in the warfarin group (16.7%) had venographically-documented upper extremity thrombosis at day 90 (p=0.48). Safety was satisfactory and similar with both treatments.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin at a fixed, very low dose and nadroparin at a fixed, prophylactic dose had comparable benefit-to-risk ratios in the prevention of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in cancer patients.

[Intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round-cell tumors. An entity among peritoneal carcinomatoses in young adults]

Desmoplastic small round-cell tumors in young adults were first described in 1989. They may be revealed by an abdominal mass or a peritoneal carcinomatosis. The diagnosis and the initial treatment are based on debulking surgery. Chemotherapy using doxorubicin, ifosfamide, etoposide and cisplatin can then be proposed. Despite some initial chemosensitivity, prognosis remains poor.

Efficacy and safety of the paclitaxel and carboplatin combination in patients with previously treated advanced ovarian carcinoma. A multicenter GINECO (Group d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens) phase II study

BACKGROUND

Platinum compounds are the most active drugs in ovarian cancer treatment; cisplatin and carboplatin demonstrated similar efficacies but different toxicity profiles. Paclitaxel combined with cisplatin as first-line treatment improved overall survival when compared to a cisplatin-cyclophosphamide combination, but generated higher rates of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and neurotoxicity. The paclitaxel-carboplatin combination may be better tolerated than cisplatin-paclitaxel.

DESIGN

The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin in previously treated advanced ovarian cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During or after platinum-based chemotherapy, 73 patients with progressive advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma were enrolled to receive every four weeks a three-hour infusion of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 followed by a 30-minute carboplatin infusion. The carboplatin dose was calculated to obtain the recommended area concentration-versus-time under the curve of 5 mg x ml-1 x min.

RESULTS

Toxicity and response could be evaluated for 72 and 62 patients, respectively. Eleven complete and 15 partial responses gave an overall response rate of 42% (95% CI: 30%-54%). Response rates for platinum-refractory patients and those with early (> or = 3 and < 12 months) and late (> 12 months) relapses were 24%, 33% and 70%, respectively. The respective median response duration, the median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 8, 6 and 14 months. Myelosuppression was the most frequent and severe toxicity. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred, respectively in 30% and 23% of the cycles; 6% of the cycles benefited from medullary growth factors. Only one episode of febrile neutropenia was observed. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred, respectively during 3% and 1% of the cycles. Alopecia was frequent. Transient peripheral neuropathy developed in 47% of patients but was severe in only one patient. One early death was attributed to progressive disease and possibly to therapy.

CONCLUSION

This combined paclitaxel-carboplatin therapy is effective and can be safely administered to ovarian cancer patients who relapse after one or two regimens of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of the combination paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with previously treated advanced ovarian carcinoma: a multicenter French Groupe des Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens phase II study

The French Groupe des Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO) conducted a multicenter phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of this combination in pretreated advanced ovarian cancer. Patients with progressive ovarian carcinoma during or after platinum-based chemotherapy received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours followed by intravenous carboplatin over 30 minutes every 4 weeks. The dose of carboplatin was calculated using a projected area under the concentration-time curve of 5 mg/mL x min. Of the 50 patients entered, 50 were evaluable for toxicity and 42 for response. There were eight complete and 10 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 43% (95% confidence interval, 28% to 56%). Overall response rates in platinum refractory patients and in those with early (> or = 3 and < 12 months) and late (> or = 12 months) relapse was 28%, 33%, and 71%, respectively. Median response duration, progression-free survival, and overall survivals were 8, 6, and 14 months, respectively. The most frequent and severe toxicity was myelosuppression. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 30% and 23% of cycles, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered in 6%. Only one case of neutropenic fever was observed. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 3% and 1% of cycles, respectively. Alopecia and moderate nausea or vomiting were frequent. Transitory peripheral neuropathy was present in 45% of patients but was severe in only one patient. One early death was observed due to progressive disease and possibly to therapy. The combination of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion and carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 5 is an effective therapy in patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and may be administered safely to outpatients who relapse after one or two lines of chemotherapy.

Postmenopausal patients with node-positive resectable breast cancer. Tamoxifen vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) plus tamoxifen vs control--preliminary results of a 4-arm randomised trial. The French Adjuvant Study Group

In 1986 the true benefit of adjuvant medical treatment in postmenopausal patients with pathological node-positive breast adenocarcinoma was still controversial. The French Adjuvant Study Group (FASG) initiated a randomised trial to elucidate the respective roles of adjuvant chemo-and/or hormonotherapy in this group of patients. Of the 776 patients who have been included between 1986 and 1990, 741 were fully eligible for evaluation. Inclusion criteria were postmenopausal patients aged between 50 and 70 years with adenocarcinoma of the breast, positive pathological nodes and no distant metastasis. Patients were randomised to 1 of 4 treatment arms: Group A (n = 192) received tamoxifen 30 mg/day orally for 3 years; Group B (n = 183) received FEC 50 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) for 6 cycles; Group C (n = 182) received tamoxifen 30 mg/day orally for 3 years plus FEC 50 for 6 cycles; Group D (n = 184) received no medical adjuvant treatment. Surgery was either modified radical mastectomy (n = 363) or tumorectomy (n = 378), and postoperative irradiation was given to all patients. All major prognostic factors were well balanced between the 4 patient groups. Toxicity was evaluated in 348 patients in Groups B and C who received a total of 1983 chemotherapy cycles. Median epirubicin dose intensity (mg/m2/week) was 15.8 in Group B and 15.7 in Group C. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was observed in 4.7% of cycles for Group B and 3.7% for Group C. Grade 3 to 4 nausea/vomiting were seen in 18% of treatment cycles in Group B and 15% in Group C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)