Prognostic value of EndoPredict test in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary breast cancer screened for the randomized, double-blind, phase III UNIRAD trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the multigene EndoPredict test in prospectively collected data of patients screened for the randomized, double-blind, phase III UNIRAD trial, which evaluated the addition of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy in high-risk, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were classified into low or high risk according to the EPclin score, consisting of a 12-gene molecular score combined with tumor size and nodal status. Association of the EPclin score with disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The independent prognostic added value of EPclin score was tested in a multivariate Cox model after adjusting on tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

EndoPredict test results were available for 768 patients: 663 patients classified as EPclin high risk (EPCH) and 105 patients as EPclin low risk (EPCL). Median follow-up was 70 months (range 1-172 months). For the 429 EPCH randomized patients, there was no significant difference in DFS between treatment arms. The 60-month relapse rate for patients in the EPCL and EPCH groups was 0% and 7%, respectively. Hazard ratio (HR) supposing continuous EPclin score was 1.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-2.5, P < 0.0001]. This prognostic effect remained significant when assessed in a Cox model adjusting on tumor size, number of positive nodes and tumor grade (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.13, P = 0.0141). The 60-month DMFS for patients in the EPCL and EPCH groups was 100% and 94%, respectively (adjusted HR 8.10, 95% CI 1.1-59.1, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm the value of EPclin score as an independent prognostic parameter in node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer patients receiving standard adjuvant treatment. EPclin score can be used to identify patients at higher risk of recurrence who may warrant additional systemic treatments.

Fatigue visual analogue scale score correlates with quality of life in cancer patients receiving epoetin alfa (Sandoz) for chemotherapy-induced anaemia: The CIROCO study

PURPOSE

Available tools to measure fatigue and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cancer patients are often difficult to use in clinical practice. The fatigue visual analogue scale (VAS) provides a simple method to assess fatigue. This study evaluated the correlation between HRQoL and fatigue perceived by cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

This was a non-interventional prospective study of adult cancer patients in France presenting with chemotherapy-induced anaemia (CIA) treated with epoetin alfa (Sandoz). Data were collected using an electronic case report form at study inclusion (T0), after 2-3 chemotherapy cycles (T1) and after 4-6 cycles (T2).

RESULTS

The study included 982 patients from September 2015 to October 2017. Overall, there was a negative correlation between fatigue VAS and HRQoL. The overall haemoglobin (Hb) change between T0 and T2 was +17.8 % (± 18.1 %). Fatigue assessed by both patients and physicians showed a clinically significant improvement during the study. Global HRQoL also increased.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of CIA with epoetin alfa (Sandoz) improved Hb levels, fatigue, and HRQoL, with a correlation observed between fatigue VAS score and HRQoL. Fatigue VAS could act as a simple alternative to more complex methods to measure HRQoL; however, further analyses are required to confirm this association.

Abstract OT1-10-01: Treatment with Tucatinib in addition to Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC) after local therapy of isolated brain progression: InTTercePT, a UCBG/GINECO study

Treatment with Tucatinib in addition to Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC) after local therapy of isolated brain progression: InTTercePT, a UCBG/GINECO study. Background HER2+ MBC patient on first line treatment with pertuzumab and trastuzumab have a 13% risk of developing brain metastasis (BM) as the first site of progression. For such patient with isolated brain progression, guidelines recommend to use central nervous system (CNS) directed therapy whenever possible (stereotactic radiosurgery or surgery or both). These patients will have a higher risk of subsequent brain and systemic progression after local treatment. Therefore, whether systemic treatment should be continued or changed remains an open question. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor tucatinib is an orally bioavailable HER2 inhibitor with validated antineoplastic activity and the ability to cross the blood brain barrier. The randomized HER2CLIMB study, demonstrated that adding tucatinib to trastuzumab/capecitabine improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among HER2+ MBC patients previously treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab and T-DM1. Particularly, this regimen demonstrated improved antitumor activity in patients with BM, in terms of CNS-PFS and OS. Exploratory analysis of HER2CLIMB and in a phase 1b study, showed patients who continued systemic treatment with tucatinib (in combination either with trastuzumab/capecitabine or TDM-1) after CNS-directed treatment had a better outcome compared with those that discontinued systemic tucatinib-based treatment. These results suggest that for patient in the first line metastatic setting who experience isolated brain progression, adding tucatinib to the trastuzumab/pertuzumab regimen could help control BM, improve PFS, OS and patients’ quality of life. Trial design InTTercePT is an open-label, single-arm, national, multicentric, phase II trial assessing the combination of tucatinib, pertuzumab and trastuzumab. Tucatinib will be administered orally twice daily at 300 mg. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab will be administered at the initial dose of 840 mg and 8 mg/kg respectively following by a maintenance dose of 420 mg and 6mg/kg respectively, 3-weekly. If indicated, hormone therapy is allowed in combination with HER2-directed therapy. Eligibility criteria include HER2+ MBC with isolated brain progression (new or progressive BM with stable or responding systemic disease) under pertuzumab/trastuzumab treatment (± taxane) after complete local treatment (surgery and/or radiation therapy). There is no limit to the number and size of BM. Specific aims To evaluate the efficacy, in terms of PFS rate (RECIST v1.1) of tucatinib in combination with pertuzumab/trastuzumab. Secondary endpoints include OS, brain PFS (RECIST v1.1) and BM response in patient not in complete remission at the brain level after local treatment and safety (NCI-CTCAE v5.0). Statistical methods Given the lack of safety data from this association, two interim safety analysis are planned: after 10 and 20 patients having received at least one dose of the treatments combination during at least one cycle. The number of patients to be included was calculated using Fleming’s single-stage procedure for phase II trials. The sample size calculation was based on a minimum success (non-progression rate at 6 months) considered of interest of p1 = 75% and an uninteresting rate of p0 = 60%. Assuming a unilateral type I error alpha of 10% and a power of 85%, 52 patients are needed. Considering 5% of the patients may be non-evaluable, 55 patients will be included. At the time of analysis, if at least 37 successes are observed, the treatment will be considered as interesting for further investigation. The study is recruiting. By July 1, 2022, 10 patients have been screened and 8 treated (NCT05041842). Funding SeaGen Contact information thomas.bachelot@lyon.unicancer.fr

Citation Format: Thomas Bachelot, Christelle Jouannaud, Benjamin Verret, Sylvie Chabaud, Camille Petrau, Laetitia Stefani, Mony Ung, Isabelle Desmoulins, William Jacot, Caroline Bailleux, Sandrine Marques, Jérôme Lemonnier, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard. Treatment with Tucatinib in addition to Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC) after local therapy of isolated brain progression: InTTercePT, a UCBG/GINECO study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-10-01.

Therapy-related Myeloid Neoplasms Following PARP Inhibitors: Real-life Experience

PURPOSE

To provide insights into the diagnosis and management of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) following PARP inhibitors (PARPi).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a French cancer center, we identified and described the profiles of 13 t-MN diagnosed among 37 patients with ovarian cancer referred to hematology consultation for cytopenia under PARPi. Next, we described these 13 t-MN post-PARPi among 37 t-MN post ovarian cancer according to PARPi exposure. Finally, we described 69 t-MN post-PARPi in a national cohort.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2021, cumulative incidence of t-MN was 3.5% (13/373) among patients with ovarian cancer treated with PARPi. At time of hematologic consultation, patients with t-MN had a longer PARPi exposure (9 vs. 3 months, P = 0.01), lower platelet count (74 vs. 173 G/L, P = 0.0005), and more cytopenias (2 vs. 1, P = 0.0005). Compared with t-MN not exposed to PARPi, patients with t-MN-PARPi had more BRCA1/2 germline mutation (61.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.03) but similar overall survival (OS). In the national cohort, most t-MN post-PARPi had a complex karyotype (61%) associated with a high rate of TP53 mutation (71%). Median OS was 9.6 months (interquartile range, 4-14.6). In multivariate analysis, a longer time between end of PARPi and t-MN (HR, 1.046; P = 0.02), olaparib compared with other PARPi (HR, 5.82; P = 0.003) and acute myeloid leukemia (HR, 2.485; P = 0.01) were associated with shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large series, we described a high incidence of t-MN post-PARPi associated with unfavorable cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities leading to poor OS. Early detection is crucial, particularly in cases of delayed cytopenia.

Switch to fulvestrant and palbociclib versus no switch in advanced breast cancer with rising ESR1 mutation during aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib therapy (PADA-1): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In advanced oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors frequently stems from ESR1-mutated subclones, which might be sensitive to fulvestrant. The PADA-1 trial aimed to show the efficacy of an early change in therapy on the basis of a rising ESR1 mutation in blood (bESR1^mut), while assessing the global safety of combination fulvestrant and palbociclib.

METHODS

We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial in 83 hospitals in France. Women aged at least 18 years with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were recruited and monitored for rising bESR1^mut during first-line aromatase inhibitor (2·5 mg letrozole, 1 mg anastrozole, or 25 mg exemestane, orally once per day, taken continuously) and palbociclib (125 mg orally once per day on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) therapy. Patients with newly present or increased bESR1^mut in circulating tumour DNA and no synchronous disease progression were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue with the same therapy or to switch to fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscularly on day 1 of each 28-day cycle and on day 15 of cycle 1) and palbociclib (dosing unchanged). The randomisation sequence was generated within an interactive web response system using a minimisation method (with an 80% random factor); patients were stratified according to visceral involvement (present or absent) and the time from inclusion to bESR1^mut detection (<12 months or ≥12 months). The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival from random assignment, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all randomly assigned patients), and grade 3 or worse haematological adverse events in all patients. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03079011), and is now complete.

FINDINGS

From March 22, 2017, to Jan 31, 2019, 1017 patients were included, of whom 279 (27%) developed a rising bESR1^mut and 172 (17%) were randomly assigned to treatment: 88 to switching to fulvestrant and palbociclib and 84 patients to continuing aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib. At database lock on July 31, 2021, randomly assigned patients had a median follow-up of 35·3 months (IQR 29·2-41·4) from inclusion and 26·0 months (13·8-34·3) from random assignment. Median progression-free survival from random assignment was 11·9 months (95% CI 9·1-13·6) in the fulvestrant and palbociclib group versus 5·7 months (3·9-7·5) in the aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib group (stratified HR 0·61, 0·43-0·86; p=0·0040). The most frequent grade 3 or worse haematological adverse events were neutropenia (715 [70·3%] of 1017 patients), lymphopenia (66 [6·5%]), and thrombocytopenia (20 [2·0%]). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in step 2 were neutropenia (35 [41·7%] of 84 patients in the aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib group vs 39 [44·3%] of 88 patients in the fulvestrant and palbociclib group) and lymphopenia (three [3·6%] vs four [4·5%]). 31 (3·1%) patients had grade 3 or worse serious adverse events related to treatment in the overall population. Three (1·7%) of 172 patients randomly assigned had one serious adverse event in step 2: one (1·2%) grade 4 neutropenia and one (1·2%) grade 3 fatigue among 84 patients in the aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib group, and one (1·1%) grade 4 neutropenia among 88 patients in the fulvestrant and palbociclib group. One death by pulmonary embolism in step 1 was declared as being treatment related.

INTERPRETATION

PADA-1 is the first prospective randomised trial showing that the early therapeutic targeting of bESR1^mut results in significant clinical benefit. Additionally, the original design explored in PADA-1 might help with tackling acquired resistance with new drugs in future trials.

FUNDING

Pfizer.

Validation of the geriatric vulnerability score in older patients with ovarian cancer: an analysis from the GCIG-ENGOT-GINECO EWOC-1 study

BACKGROUND

Older patients with ovarian cancer represent a heterogeneous population. The French National Group of Investigators for the Study of Ovarian and Breast Cancer developed the geriatric vulnerability score (GVS) to identify geriatric parameters predictive of poor outcomes. A prospective validation of the GVS was needed.

METHODS

The EWOC-1 study (NCT02001272) was an international, open-label, phase 2, three-arm trial designed according to a two-step process. Patients aged 70 years or older with newly diagnosed stage III or IV ovarian cancer were identified and the GVS determined. Those with a GVS of 3 or greater were randomly assigned to the EWOC-1 trial, stratified by country and surgical outcome, to receive three different carboplatin with or without paclitaxel regimens; those not included in the EWOC-1 trial were followed up in the EWOC-1 registry. External validation of the GVS was a secondary endpoint of the trial. Three validation cohorts were identified: the total population (validation cohort 1 [V1], n=447), the registry-only population (validation cohort 2 [V2], n=327), and the carboplatin-paclitaxel-treated population (validation cohort 3 [V3], n=320).

FINDINGS

From Dec 11, 2013, to Nov 16, 2018, 447 patients were included in 48 academic centres in six countries; 120 in the EWOC-1 trial and 327 in the EWOC-1 registry. Median follow-up was 19·7 (95% CI 8·5-29·7) months for the total cohort; missing values were low (<2%). According to the maximum likelihood analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) of death in V1 was 1·8 (95% CI 1·1-3·1, p=0·029) for those with a GVS of 1; 2·4 (1·4-4·0, p=0·0009) with a GVS of 2; 4·1 (2·5-7·0, p<0·0001) for a GVS of 3; 5·5 (3·3-9·3, p<0·0001) for a GVS of 4; and 9·1 (4·7-17·5, p<0·0001) for a GVS of 5 compared with a score of 0. Whatever the validation cohort, GVS of 3 or more significantly segregated two groups with different overall survival: V1 (median 13·2 [95% CI: 10·8-18·7] vs 40·8 [32·0-45·6] months; HR 2·8 [95% CI 2·2-3·7]; p<0·0001); V2 (11·9 [95% CI 8·8-18·1] vs 40·8 [32·0-45·6] months, HR 3·5 [2·5-4·9]; p<0·0001); and V3 (18·1 [95% CI 15·8-31·8] vs 43·0 [40·6-49·7] months, HR 2·6 [1·9 to 3·7]; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

The GVS has high prognostic performance for overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, independently of geographic and historic effect (V1), as well as treatment patterns (V3), validated in an international population. Even though the GVS is time consuming it will allow the stratification of populations for clinical research and might permit the orientation of the geriatric intervention to specific domains.

FUNDING

French National Cancer Institute.

TRANSLATION

For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Efficacy and Safety of First-line Single-Agent Carboplatin vs Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel for Vulnerable Older Adult Women With Ovarian Cancer: A GINECO/GCIG Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Single-agent carboplatin is often proposed instead of a conventional carboplatin-paclitaxel doublet in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer. Such an approach could have a detrimental effect on outcomes for these patients.

Objective

To compare the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of single-agent carboplatin every 3 weeks, weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or conventional every-3-weeks carboplatin-paclitaxel in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This international, open-label, 3-arm randomized clinical trial screened 447 women 70 years and older with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer by determining their Geriatric Vulnerability Score; 120 patients with a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 3 or higher were stratified by country and surgical outcome. Enrollment took place at 48 academic centers in France, Italy, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, and Canada from December 11, 2013, to April 26, 2017. Final analysis database lock April 2019. Data analysis was performed from February 1 to December 31, 2019.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of (1) carboplatin, area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL·min, plus paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2, every 3 weeks; (2) single-agent carboplatin, AUC 5 mg/mL·min or AUC 6 mg/mL·min, every 3 weeks; or (3) weekly carboplatin, AUC 2 mg/mL·min, plus paclitaxel, 60 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was treatment feasibility, defined as the ability to complete 6 chemotherapy cycles without disease progression, premature toxic effects-related treatment discontinuation, or death.

Results

A total of 120 women were randomized. The mean and median age was 80 (interquartile range, 76-83; range, 70-94) years; 43 (36%) had a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 4 and 13 (11%) had a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 5; 40 (33%) had stage IV disease. During its third meeting, the independent data monitoring committee's recommendation led to the termination of the trial because single-agent carboplatin was associated with significantly worse survival. Six cycles were completed in 26 of 40 (65%), 19 of 40 (48%), and 24 of 40 (60%) patients in the every-3-weeks combination, single-agent carboplatin, and weekly combination groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were less common with the standard every-3-weeks combination (17 of 40 [43%]) than single-agent carboplatin or weekly combination therapy (both 23 of 40 [58%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 4 patients (2 of 40 [5%] in each combination group).

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial shows that compared with every-3-weeks or weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel regimens, single-agent carboplatin was less active with significantly worse survival outcomes in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02001272.

Feasibility of a prehabilitation programme dedicated to older patients with cancer before complex medical-surgical procedures: the PROADAPT pilot study protocol

BACKGROUND

Ageing is associated with an increased prevalence of comorbidities and sarcopenia as well as a decline of functional reserve of multiple organ systems, which may lead, in the context of the disease-related and/or treatment-related stress, to functional deconditioning. The multicomponent 'Prehabilitation & Rehabilitation in Oncogeriatrics: Adaptation to Deconditioning risk and Accompaniment of Patients' Trajectories (PROADAPT)' intervention was developed multiprofessionally to implement prehabilitation in older patients with cancer.

METHODS

The PROADAPT pilot study is an interventional, non-comparative, prospective, multicentre study. It will include 122 patients oriented to complex medical-surgical curative procedures (major surgery or radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy). After informed consent, patients will undergo a comprehensive geriatric assessment and will be offered a prehabilitation kit that includes an advice booklet with personalised objectives and respiratory rehabilitation devices. Patients will then be called weekly and monitored for physical and respiratory rehabilitation, preoperative renutrition, motivational counselling and iatrogenic prevention. Six outpatient visits will be planned: at inclusion, a few days before the procedure and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the end of the procedure. The main outcome of the study is the feasibility of the intervention, defined as the ability to perform at least one of the components of the programme. Clinical data collected will include patient-specific and cancer-specific characteristics.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the Ile de France 8 ethics committee on 5 June 2018. The results of the primary and secondary objectives will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03659123. Pre-results of the trial.

Feasibility and efficacy of a supervised home-based physical exercise program for metastatic cancer patients receiving oral targeted therapy: study protocol for the phase II/III - UNICANCER SdS 01 QUALIOR trial

BACKGROUND

Currently, oral targeted therapies are known to be effective and are frequently used to treat metastatic cancer patients, but fatigue is a frequently reported early side effect of these treatments. This fatigue may impact the patient's treatment adherence and result in a negative impact on quality of life. Physical exercise significantly improved the general well-being and quality of life of advanced cancer patients. However, there is no specific physical activity program adapted for patients with advanced disease.

METHODS

QUALIOR is a two-part, randomized, open-label, and multicenter with two arms phase II/III trial. Patients (phase II: n = 120; phase III: n = 312) with metastatic cancer (breast cancer, kidney cancer, lung cancer, and other cancers [including but not limited to colon cancer, melanoma, sarcoma, or hepatocarcinoma]) treated with a first- or second-line oral targeted therapy without chemotherapy will be included. Patients will be randomized (2:1) to a 3-month supervised home-based standardized physical activity program or to a recommended adapted physical activity (via a booklet). The primary objective of the phase II is to evaluate the feasibility of the supervised program. The primary objective of the phase III is the evaluation of the benefit of the supervised home-based program compare to the recommended program in terms of fatigue and quality of life at 3 months. The secondary objectives aim to evaluate the impact of the supervised program on fatigue over time, pain, physical capacities, psychosocial and cognitive functions, general quality of life, frequency of dose reduction and patients' adherence to the targeted therapy, overall survival, and progression-free survival. This study will also evaluate the medico-economic impact of supervised program compared to the recommended adapted physical activity program.

DISCUSSION

The aim of this study is to evaluate home-based physical exercise program for metastatic cancer patients treated with oral targeted therapies to help patients to cope with fatigue and improve quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov since May 2017 ( NCT03169075 ).

Interventions to improve physical performances of older people with cancer before complex medico-surgical procedures: Protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Current demographics lead increasing older cancer patients to undergo complex medico-surgical procedures, with substantial risk of decompensations and deconditioning. The Prehabilitation & Rehabilitation in Oncology: Adaptation to Disease and Accompaniment of Patients' Trajectories (PROADAPT) project is currently being developed with the aim of improving care, through standardized care pathways guided by existing evidence and implementation programs. A working group will specifically focus on improvement of physical performances before such procedures. These interventions may have been developed in different contexts: before surgery in large, before carcinologic surgery or complex medical interventions (chemotherapy, radiotherapy), or in primary care for elderly patients to prevent sarcopenia and frailty. Post-surgical interventions are out of the scope of this review. The objective of this review is to summarize the level of evidence to support physical reconditioning interventions and identify areas where further work is required.

METHODS

This umbrella review will include moderate to high quality systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and pre-existing umbrella or meta-reviews. Two reviewers will independently search the following databases: PubMed/MedLine, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL. Research strategy will use diverse keywords used to refer to the concepts of "prehabilitation," "preoperative exercise," or "preoperative rehabilitation," with prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria and only systematic reviews selection. The distinct types of interventions presented using PRISMA guidelines and a narrative reporting of results. A focus will be made on outcomes such as physical performances, quality of life, autonomy in everyday activities, or number of hospital bed days.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for such an umbrella review. Our review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed international journal using open access option if available. It will be complementary to reviews focused on hospital discharge of older people.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020100110.

P353 Structural, functional, and electromechanical alterations in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation compared to healthy controls

Background and Methods

We sought to evaluate the clinical and echocardiographic differences between healthy controls and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters (performed in sinus rhythm) in 46 paroxysmal AF patients were compared with a departmental database of 83 health controls.

Results

AF patients were older and had increased body size (Table 1). 39/46 (84%) of AF patients had hypertension and 23/46 (50%) had diabetes mellitus.

AF patients had increased left ventricular (LV) mass, and reduced diastolic function (lower e’ and increased E/e’ ratio) when compared to healthy controls. Left atrial (LA) volumes were significantly increased in the AF group. All strain parameters – reservoir, conduit, and contractile strain – were impaired in AF patients compared to controls. LA mechanical dispersion (MD) was significantly increased in AF patients. A ratio of indexed LA volume/LA reservoir strain was significantly higher in AF patients over controls.

The duration of AF had an inverse correlation with LA reservoir strain (Fig 1) (r=–0.78; p &lt; 0.001).

Conclusions

Compared to healthy controls, patients with paroxysmal AF have significant structural, functional and electromechanical alterations. LA strain is significantly impaired in paroxysmal AF and correlates with AF duration.

Table 1. Echocardiographic parameters Parameter Controls (mean ± SD) AF patients (mean ± SD) P value Age (years) 48 ± 18 58 ± 14 0.001 Body surface area (m2) 1.9 ± 0.2 2 ± 0.2 0.014 LV mass (g) 178 ± 48 223 ± 68 &lt;0.001 Average e’ velocity (cms-1) 10.3 ±2.7 8.1 ± 2.2 &lt;0.001 E/e’ 7.4 ± 1.9 9.3 ± 3.4 0.001 Indexed LA end systolic volume (ml/m2) 27.2 ± 7.1 39.0 ± 11.6 &lt;0.001 LA ejection fraction 55.2 ± 10.4 48.5 ± 14.0 0.007 LA functional index 43.7 ± 14.6 29.8 ± 14.3 &lt;0.001 LA reservoir strain (%) 34.3 ± 6.8 27.9± 8.1 &lt;0.001 LA conduit strain (%) 18.4 ± 6.2 13.5 ± 4.7 &lt;0.001 LA contractile strain (%) 15.9 ± 3.9 14.4 ± 5.5 0.007 LA mechanical dispersion (ms) 25.8 ± 9.6 30.9 ± 11.6 0.018 Indexed LA volume / Reservoir strain ratio 0.8 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.9 &lt;0.001 LV = left ventricular; LA = left atrium; SD = standard deviation

Abstract P353 Figure. Fig 1. AF duration vs. Reservoir strain

P1534 Clinical feasibility of 4D myocardial speckle tracking strain analysis in soccer referee: comparison to 2D strain

Funding Acknowledgements

no

OnBehalf

no

Background

Quantitative analysis of deformation parameters can provide evidence about the presence of disease . Speckle tracking (ST)strain is recently largely used in sports medicine, as an usefull tool to add value to the traditional echo information .Especially 4D echo-strain is emerging in this context despite not yet completely explored. The study aim to verify the feasibility of the 4D strain analysis , compared to the 2D ST strain data, in a class of international trained soccer referee. Materials and methods : a group of 25 soccer referee ( aged 45,5 ± 5) underwent to an EMT, conducted at the 85% of their effort to obtain the eligibility. An 2D echocardiographic evaluation was also performed with the measurements of the systolic-diastolic parameters . A specific investigation for the 2D and 4D strain analysis by X-Strain-Esaote software, was possible from the 2C,3C;4C apical view chambers, acquired as cine loop. The study was completed by the study of the circumferential strain calculated from short axis view, from the images of the basal and medium LV segments. Results : all 2D echo parameters were normal (LVDD: 50,56 ± 2 mm,68; LVSD: 35,4 ± 2,3 mm; EF: 65,76 ±1,78%; E/A:1,73 ± 0,35 ; RV:23,71 ± 1 mm) The 2D GLS ( -22,29 ± 2,64); Circumferential strain( Basal -22,29 ± 5,3; Apical -25,66 ± 5,8 ) were in the normal range. No statistical differences ( P:NS) were observed comparing the mean GLS(21,60 ± 2,68) to the LV 4D strain( -21,24 ± 2,75) Conclusions : 4D strain completes and strengthens the role of the 2D strain in evaluating the myocardial function contributing to exclude eventual undiscovered disease. Especially in athletes, often checked in a short time the combination of the two methods should be widely proposed .More studies will be necessary in future to confirm this hypothesis.

Abstract P1534 Figure. 4D strain

P970 Significant differences in atrial structural and functional parameters leading to differing mechanisms of atrial fibrillation in athletes compared to non-athletes

Methods

36 endurance athletes in sinus rhythm, with a previous history of AF (ATH-AF) were compared to age and gender matched endurance athletes with no prior history of AF (ATH), non athletes with paroxysmal AF (NONATH-AF) and age and gender matched healthy controls (CONTROL). A detailed transthoracic echocardiogram was performed with all groups in sinus rhythm, with detailed left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) measurements, including strain analysis.

Results

All athletes had increased LA and LV size when compared with healthy controls (Table 1). Non athletes with paroxysmal AF had increased LA size when compared with controls. However, indexed LA/LV ratio was preserved in athletes and similar to healthy individuals, whilst AF patients had significantly increased LA/LV ratio. Athletes with AF had higher e’ velocity and lower E/e’, whereas e’ was reduced and E/e’ elevated in non-athlete AF patients.

Athletes had impaired LA reservoir and contractile strain, and reduced LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) compared with healthy controls.

Conclusions

Compared to healthy controls, athletes have reduced LA and LV strain, with preserved LV diastolic function and LA/LV ratio. In contrast, altered diastolic function with differential increase in LA volume was observed in AF patients. The increased risk of AF in athletes is likely mediated by different mechanistic processes other than an atrial myopathy consequent to diastolic dysfunction as observed in non-athletes with AF.

Table 1. LA and LV parameters Parameter ATH-AF ATH NONATH-AF CONTROL P value LVEDV indexed (ml/m2) 84 ± 12 79 ± 14 57 ± 10 51 ± 13 &lt;0.001 LVESV indexed (ml/m2) 35 ± 6 34 ± 7 25 ± 8 27 ± 33 0.02 LV ejection fraction (%) 58 ± 4 56 ± 4 56 ± 10 58 ± 8 0.586 LV global longitudinal strain (%) 19.2 ± 1.7 18.9 ± 2.1 21 ± 3.1 21.7 ± 2.9 &lt;0.001 e’ vel (cm/s) 10 ± 2 10 ± 3 8 ± 2 9 ± 2 0.007 E/e’ 5.7 ± 1.3 5.9 ± 1.8 9.1 ± 3.3 7.5 ± 1.5 &lt;0.001 LAV max indexed (ml/m2) 45 ± 11 43 ± 12 38 ± 11 27 ± 8 &lt;0.001 Indexed LAV/LVEDV ratio 0.5 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.1 &lt;0.001 LA reservoir strain (%) 27.2 ± 4.8 28.2 ± 3.7 27.9 ± 8.4 33.2 ± 7.0 &lt;0.001 LA conduit strain (%) 14.2 ± 4.5 14.4 ± 4.0 14.9 ± 5.5 16.6 ± 6.3 0.182 LA contractile strain (%) 13.0 ± 3.1 13.8 ± 3.6 13.0 ± 5.1 16.6 ± 3.1 &lt;0.001 LV = left ventricular, LAV = left atrial volume, LA = left atrial

P1504 Inter-vendor comparison of left atrial 2-dimensional strain using multilayer analysis

BACKGROUND

Left atrial strain (LAS) is increasingly being accepted as a marker of left atrial function. Different vendors utilise different techniques of measuring LAS in echocardiography.

AIMS

To determine the difference between multilayer endocardial and mid-myocardial measurements of LA strain on General Electric (GE) Echopac compared to the TOMTEC system which tracks endocardial strain.

METHODS

Peak reservoir left atrial strain (LAS) was measured on 50 healthy controls using the two different echocardiographic software packages. GE Echopac (v201) 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography technique (LV package) was used to measuremid-myocardial (GE-mid) and endocardial (GE-endo) LAS. This was compared to LAS measurement using TOMTEC (v4.6) which uses an endocardial tracking technique. LAS was measured in 4ch and 2ch views and average biplane strain measurement was obtained.

RESULTS

The mean of GE-mid LAS was 36.3 ± 6.3%, GE-endo LAS was higher with a mean of 44.1 ± 8.0%, while TOMTEC LAS was 42.1 ± 6.3 %. GE-mid and GE-endo LAS correlated well with TOMTEC LAS (r = 0.9, p &lt; 0.001 for both). On Bland-Altman Analysis, GE-mid LAS measurements were systematically lower than TOMTEC LAS (mean difference -5.77), whereas GE-endo LAS had no systematic bias (mean difference 1.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Mid-myocardial peak reservoir left atrial strain, which is routinely measured using GE Echopac software, systematically underestimates LAS as compared to TOMTEC LAS or GE endocardial LAS. This suggests that serial follow up of LAS measurements for patients should be performed on the same software.

A GINECO randomized phase II assessing addition of an aromatase inhibitor to oral vinorelbine in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients

1043

Background: For ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), efficacy of endocrine therapy + chemotherapy combination remain an open question. We hypothesized that continuing ER targeted therapy after progression in combination with chemotherapy may improve disease control. The objective of the CHEOPS trial was to assess the benefit of adding aromatase inhibitor (AI) to metronomic chemotherapy,oral vinorelbine, 50mg/3 time a week (OV) for AI pre-treated, ER+/HER2- mBC patients. Methods: Eligible patients had to have progressed on endocrine therapy and one or two lines of chemotherapy. They were randomized between vinorelbine (OV) and vinorelbine + AI (OV+AI). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). To show an increase of median PFS (from 3.5 to 5.5 month, HR 0.636), with alpha = 5% and power = 80%, 130 evaluable patients were needed. Results: 121 patients were Included (OV = 61; OV+AI = 60). Median age was 68 (range: 49-87), Median time from metastatic diagnosis was 3.2 years (range 0 - 16.9). 109 patients (90%) had visceral metastases. They all had previously received an AI and had been treated with one line (N = 66, 54.5%), or 2 lines (N = 55, 45.5%) of chemotherapy. Median PFS was increased from 2.3 months with OV to 3.7 months with OV+AI, but this difference was not significant (HR 0.73 [95 % CI 0.50-1.06], log-rank test: P = 0.09) 81 patients (67%) had at least one adverse event (AE) of grade ≥ 3 (40 (66%) for OV vs 41 (68%) for OV+AI). The most common grade ≥ 3 AE were: GT gammas (23%), neutropenia (18%), arterial hypertension and lymphopenia (17%). The occurrence of 3 toxic deaths (OV = 1; OV+AI = 2) secondary to febrile aplasia motivated the early cessation of this clinical trial. 9 patients (5 OV (10%) and 4 OV+AI (8%) presented an objective complete or partial response. Conclusions: The addition of AI to OV over OV alone in AI resistant mBC was associated with a non-significant improvement of PFS, but both PFS are lower than expected. Metronomic OV schedule, at 50 mg three times a week, requires close biological monitoring. The question of hormonal treatment and chemotherapy combination remains open. Clinical trial information: EudraCT Number: 2015-000401-39.

EWOC-1: A randomized trial to evaluate the feasibility of three different first-line chemotherapy regimens for vulnerable elderly women with ovarian cancer (OC): A GCIG-ENGOT-GINECO study

5508

Background: The Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS) combining albumin, lymphocyte count, ADL, IADL and HADS scores has been reported (Falandry C Ann Oncol 2013) to identify vulnerable elderly OC patients (pts) as those with a GVS≥3. For such pts, Carboplatin (Cb) monotherapy or weekly Cb plus paclitaxel (Pa) are often proposed as an alternative to Cb-Pa given every 3 weeks. Methods: Pts ≥70 yrs with first line FIGO stage III/IV epithelial OC were screened for GVS. Those with GVS≥3 were randomized to receive either arm A: Cb AUC5-6 + Pa 175mg/m², d1q3week or arm B: Cb AUC5-6 d1q3week or arm C:weekly Cb AUC2 + Pa 60mg/m² d1-d8-d15 q4week. Primary endpoint is treatment feasibility defined as the ability to complete 6 chemotherapy courses without disease progression, early treatment stopping due to unacceptable toxicity or death. Inclusion of 240 pts was planned. Results: Among 444 screened pts, 120 were randomized from 12/2013 to 04/2017 (armA = B = C = 40). Pts characteristics were well balanced between arms A-B-C respectively: median age (79-82-80 yrs), FIGO stage IV (32-37-27%), primary surgery (65-72-70%), absence of macroscopic residuals (CC-0) (7-5-7%), ECOG≥2 (50-50-47%). Feasibility per protocol for arms A-B-C is 65%, 47% and 60% (p = 0.15). Main reasons for treatment arrest are treatment toxicity (A:20%; B:15%; C:22.5%; p = 0.771) and disease progression (A:7.5%; B:30%; C:2%; p = 0.004). Median PFS for arm A-B-C are 12.5 mos (95%CI 10.3-15.3), 4.8 (3.8-15.3) and 8.3 (6.6-15.3), respectively (p < 0.001) and median OS for arm A-B-C is not reached (NR) (21, NR), 7.4 (5.3-NR) and 17.3 (10.8-NR), respectively (p = 0.001). At the pre-planned intermediate analysis, the IDMC recommended to prematurely close the study as survival in armB was found significantly worse and the number of potential pts required to find a significant difference between both Cb-Pa regimens (arms A&C) was out of reach. Conclusions: Compared to 3-weekly and weekly Cb-Pa regimens, Cb single agent was reported to be less active with significant worse survival outcome in vulnerable elderly pts. In this population Cb-Pa combination remains a standard. Clinical trial information: NCT02001272.

A phase II-III, multicenter, randomized, open study evaluating the feasibility and efficacy of a supervised home-based standard physical exercise program for metastatic cancer patients receiving oral targeted therapy: The UNICANCER SdS 01 QUALIOR study (ID-RCB: 2015-A01922-47)

TPS10126

Background: Fatigue is a frequent side effect with oral targeted therapies (OTT). Physical activity has been reported to improve fatigue and quality of life (QoL). However, few studies focused on metastatic cancer patients and mainly among patients treated with chemotherapy. Furthermore, recent guidelines recommend evaluation and optimization of standardized exercise programs. The aim of our study is to evaluate home-based standard physical exercise program (SPEP) for metastatic cancer patients treated with OTT. Methods: This phase II-III study will randomize (2:1) patients starting first-line OTT for metastatic cancer between an individualized SPEP supervised by a personal coach, and recommended physical exercises via a booklet. Eligible patients will have received ≤2 lines of metastatic chemotherapy, ECOG PS ≤2, controlled pain (VAS < 3/10), and life expectancy ≥3 months. The phase II part (120 patients) will evaluate the feasibility of a 3-month SPEP using the rate of patients performing ≥50% of SPEP (2-stage Fleming: one-sided α = 5%; β = 85%). An interim analysis is planned after the phase II. The phase III will compare the efficacy of an SPEP as opposed to recommendations to reduce fatigue and/or improve physical well-being (PWB) dimensions of QoL (evaluated with FACT-G and FACT-F questionnaires). To show a difference of ≥5 points in PWB and 2.5 for fatigue (α = 2.5%; β = 80%), 312 patients are required in the phase III trial. . Secondary objectives include: PFS, OS, other dimensions of QoL, tolerability and observance of OTT, change in body composition, physical benefits, and a medico-economic study. The SPEP was developed by specialized coaches involved in physical activity and cancer. The study has Ethic committee approval and accrual is planned in 18 French centers in April 2017, for 30 months. This is the first randomized trial dedicated to patients with metastatic cancer treated with OTT evaluating the feasibility and the efficacy of a well design home based SPEP on fatigue and physical well-being.

Treatment patterns and survival in an exhaustive French cohort of pazopanib-eligible patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS)

BACKGROUND

The French EMS study prospectively collected exhaustive data from STS patients diagnosed in the Rhone-Alpes region from 2005 to 07.

METHODS

The database included diagnosis/histology, surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatments and treatment response. Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic disease, excluding adipocytic sarcoma and GIST were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 888 total patients, 145 were included based on having metastatic disease and appropriate subtypes. All patients received treatment with systemic therapy being most common (74%, n = 107), followed by radiotherapy (30%, n = 44) and surgery (23%, n = 33). Doxorubicin, alone or in combination, was the most common first line systemic therapy (65%, n = 46). Drugs without license in sarcoma were used in 38-83% of treatments depending on treatment line. 24% of frontline patients demonstrated an objective response, decreasing to 11% objective responses in second line but no responses were documented beyond second line, with median PFS declining with each additional line. Median PFS also declined in patients receiving surgery compared to those receiving no surgery (8-15 m vs 5 m). Median OS from metastatic diagnosis for patients receiving systemic therapy was double that of patients without systemic treatment (24 m vs 12 m, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes in this population were poor and declined with successive treatment. However, results suggest that further anticancer therapies in recurrent sarcoma might be beneficial.