1
|
Petit T, Hajjaji N, Antoine E, Benderra M, Gozy M, Foa C, Mouysset J, Grenier J, Mousseau M, Mailliez A, Saghatchian M, Lachaier E, Desmoulins I, Hennequin A, Maes P, Loirat D, Ricci F, Diéras V, Berton D, Tiong FL, Teixeira L, Dohollou N, Lévy C, Bachelot T, Pierga J. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive metastatic or unresectable breast cancer: Real-life data from the temporary use authorization program in France. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7168. [PMID: 38733172 PMCID: PMC11087844 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early access program (formerly cohort Temporary Authorization for Use) was granted for trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in France based on DESTINY-Breast01 trial which demonstrated its efficacy and safety in HER2-positive metastatic/unresectable breast cancer after ≥2 anti-HER2-based regimens received at metastatic stage. METHODS This multicenter real-world early access program included HER2-positive metastatic/unresectable breast patients pretreated with at least two lines of anti-HER2 regimens who received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg intravenously in monotherapy every 3 weeks. RESULTS Four hundred and fifty-nine patients (median age, 58 years; hormone receptor-positive, 67%; brain metastases, 28.1%) received T-DXd. Before inclusion, 81.7% of patients had radiation therapy and 76.5% had undergone surgery. Median number of prior metastatic treatment lines was four (range, 2-22); 99.8% patients had received trastuzumab, 94.8% trastuzumab emtansine and 79.3% pertuzumab. Follow-up was performed from September 30, 2020 to March 30, 2021; when the early access program stopped, the median duration of T-DXd treatment was 3.4 (range, 0-7.8) months. In 160 patients with available tumor assessment, objective response rate was 56.7% and 12.1% had progression. In 57 patients with available brain tumor assessment, complete or partial intracranial response was reported for 35.7% patients and 5.4% had progression. A total of 17 (3.7%) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) was reported with no cases of ILD-related death. CONCLUSIONS In this early access program in patients with heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic/unresectable breast cancer, T-DXd had antitumor activity with a similar response to that reported in previous clinical studies. T-DXd was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Petit
- Département d'Oncologie MédicaleCentre Paul StraussStrasbourgFrance
| | - Nawale Hajjaji
- Département de Cancérologie Sénologique, Centre Oscar LambretINSERM U1192, Laboratoire PRISMLilleFrance
| | | | | | - Michel Gozy
- Département de Radiothérapie‐OncologieClinique de l'EuropeAmiensFrance
| | - Cyril Foa
- Département d'Oncologie MédicaleHôpital Saint‐JosephMarseilleFrance
| | - Jean‐Loup Mouysset
- Département de CancérologieHôpital Privé de ProvenceAix‐en‐ProvenceFrance
| | - Julien Grenier
- Unité Oncologie Sein‐GynécologieInstitut Sainte‐CatherineAvignonFrance
| | | | - Audrey Mailliez
- Département de Cancérologie Sénologique, Centre Oscar LambretINSERM U1192, Laboratoire PRISMLilleFrance
| | - Mahasti Saghatchian
- Département d'Oncologie MédicaleHôpital Américain de ParisNeuilly‐sur‐SeineFrance
| | - Emma Lachaier
- Département d'Oncologie MédicaleCHU AmiensAmiensFrance
| | | | - Audrey Hennequin
- Département d'Oncologie MédicaleCentre Georges François LeclercDijonFrance
| | - Patricia Maes
- Département d'OncologieHôpital Privé Le BoisLilleFrance
| | | | | | - Véronique Diéras
- Département d'Oncologie MédicaleCentre Eugène MarquisRennesFrance
| | - Dominique Berton
- Département d'Oncologie MédicaleInstitut de Cancérologie de l'OuestSaint‐HerblainFrance
| | | | - Luis Teixeira
- Breast Disease Unit, APHP, Hôpital Saint‐Louis, Pathophysiology of Breast Cancer TeamUniversité de Paris, INSERM U976, HIPIParisFrance
| | - Nadine Dohollou
- Service d'Oncologie MédicalePolyclinique Bordeaux Nord AquitaineBordeauxFrance
| | - Christelle Lévy
- Département d'Oncologie MédicaleCentre François BaclesseCaenFrance
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Département d'Oncologie MédicaleCentre Léon BérardLyonFrance
| | - Jean‐Yves Pierga
- Département d'Oncologie MédicaleInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Université Paris CitéParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jacquet E, Chuffart F, Vitte AL, Nika E, Mousseau M, Khochbin S, Rousseaux S, Bourova-Flin E. Aberrant activation of five embryonic stem cell-specific genes robustly predicts a high risk of relapse in breast cancers. BMC Genomics 2023; 24:463. [PMID: 37592220 PMCID: PMC10436393 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09571-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In breast cancer, as in all cancers, genetic and epigenetic deregulations can result in out-of-context expressions of a set of normally silent tissue-specific genes. The activation of some of these genes in various cancers empowers tumours cells with new properties and drives enhanced proliferation and metastatic activity, leading to a poor survival prognosis. RESULTS In this work, we undertook an unprecedented systematic and unbiased analysis of out-of-context activations of a specific set of tissue-specific genes from testis, placenta and embryonic stem cells, not expressed in normal breast tissue as a source of novel prognostic biomarkers. To this end, we combined a strict machine learning framework of transcriptomic data analysis, and successfully created a new robust tool, validated in several independent datasets, which is able to identify patients with a high risk of relapse. This unbiased approach allowed us to identify a panel of five biomarkers, DNMT3B, EXO1, MCM10, CENPF and CENPE, that are robustly and significantly associated with disease-free survival prognosis in breast cancer. Based on these findings, we created a new Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) that stratifies patients. Additionally, thanks to the identified GEC, we were able to paint the specific molecular portraits of the particularly aggressive tumours, which show characteristics of male germ cells, with a particular metabolic gene signature, associated with an enrichment in pro-metastatic and pro-proliferation gene expression. CONCLUSIONS The GEC classifier is able to reliably identify patients with a high risk of relapse at early stages of the disease. We especially recommend to use the GEC tool for patients with the luminal-A molecular subtype of breast cancer, generally considered of a favourable disease-free survival prognosis, to detect the fraction of patients undergoing a high risk of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Jacquet
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, EpiMed, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Medical Oncology Unit, Cancer and Blood Diseases Department, Grenoble, France
| | - Florent Chuffart
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, EpiMed, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Anne-Laure Vitte
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, EpiMed, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Eleni Nika
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Department of Pathology, Grenoble, France
| | - Mireille Mousseau
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Medical Oncology Unit, Cancer and Blood Diseases Department, Grenoble, France
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1039, Bioclinical Radiopharmaceuticals, Grenoble, France
| | - Saadi Khochbin
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, EpiMed, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Sophie Rousseaux
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, EpiMed, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Ekaterina Bourova-Flin
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, EpiMed, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Billa O, Dabakuyo S, Chevrier M, Bonnetain F, Desmoulins I, Jacot W, Trédan O, Debled M, Levy C, Gonçalves A, Ferrero JM, Dalenc F, Jouannaud C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Mousseau M, Grenier J, Jacquin JP, Toumi FZ, Berger F, Lemonnier J, Pierga JY. Abstract P4-07-54: Health related quality of life of patients treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: impact of clinical factors. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p4-07-54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Advances in screening and treatment have led to increase in breast cancer (BC) survival in recent years but prognoses for metastatic BC remain poor with poorer outcomes as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Treatment as bevacizumab and paclitaxel for metastatic BC, although that can increase time to progression of disease, often carry toxicity and is not curative but rather palliative in intent with the goal to improve or maintain HRQOL. The aim of this work was to assess impact of clinical factors such as disease progression, toxicity on HRQOL. Methods: COMET study is a multicenter prospective single-arm cohort study in France whose main objective was to identify biological factor that could predict the clinical benefit of bevacizumab-paclitaxel combination therapy as first treatment in HER2 negative metastatic BC. HRQOL was assessed at baseline, at every cycle (every for 4 weeks) until progression and then every 3 months up to death using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and its BC specific module, the EORTC QLQ-BR23. In this ancillary study, we targeted 5 dimensions HRQOL for the primary analyses: Global health status (GHS), physical functioning (PF), Emotional functioning (EF), fatigue (FA) and pain (PA). The primary endpoint was time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in HRQOL scales that defined as time between inclusion and the first decrease HRQOL score ≥ 5 points compared to baseline score, with no further improvement of at least 5 points. Multivariable Cox model with time dependent covariate was performed to assess clinical factors associated with TUDD for each of the 5 target dimensions HRQOL. We performed 3 models for each dimension: model 1 including all covariate with p< 0.10 in univariable; model 2 including model 1 and adjusted on cancer subtype and model 3 included model 1 stratified by cancer subtype. P value < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 510 patients included in COMET study, 432 patients with available HRQOL data were analyzed in this study. Median age at inclusion was 58 years (range: 29-83), and 24.4% of patients had triple negative tumor subtype. About 79 % of cancers were invasive ductal carcinoma and 43 % patients had least 3 metastasis sites at baseline. At baseline, patients reported a mean score for GHS of 57.6 (SD=22.7), for PF of 75.8 (23.2), for EF of 62.2 (25.8), for FA of 42.2 (29.60) and for PA of 38.1 (31.5). The Median TUDDs for the 5 targeted dimensions was 10.1 months [7.5-16.9] for GHS, 6.1 months [4.1-8.9] for PF, 21.6 [18.7-31.2] for EF, 10.8 [6.2-16.6] for FA and 13.6[10.1-22.5] months for PA. In multivariable analyses, Disease Progression was associated with TUDD of GHS (HR [99%CI] =2.4 [1.2-4.9] and TUDD of PF (2.1 [1.1-3.7]). After adjusted on cancer subtype, association persisted with TUDD of GHS (p=0.009). Performance Status was associated with TUDD of PF (1.6 [1.2-2.3]), and TUDD of Pain (1.6 [1.1-2.3]). Performance Status association with TUDD of PF continued after adjustment on cancer subtype (p=0.0003). Prior endocrine therapy was associated with TUDD of pain in patients with tumor with positive hormone receptor (HR+) (2.4 [1.2-4.7]). There was no factor associated with TUDD of EF and TUDD of FA. Conclusion: Results of this study have shown that among the 5 targeted dimensions HRQOL, Physical Functioning was deteriorated in the shortest time. Disease progression, base line performance status and prior endocrine therapy for HR+ subtype, are clinical factors that could influence HRQOL in HER2 negative metastatic BC treated with first line chemotherapy.
Citation Format: Oumar Billa, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Marion Chevrier, Franck Bonnetain, Isabelle Desmoulins, William Jacot, Olivier Trédan, Marc Debled, Christelle Levy, Anthony Gonçalves, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Florence Dalenc, Christelle Jouannaud, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Mireille Mousseau, Julien Grenier, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Fatima-Zohra Toumi, Frédérique Berger, Jérôme Lemonnier, Jean-Yves Pierga. Health related quality of life of patients treated with bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: impact of clinical factors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-54.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oumar Billa
- 1Centre George Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | | | - William Jacot
- 6Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, France
| | - Olivier Trédan
- 7Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Julien Grenier
- 16Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, Provence-Alpes-Cote d’Azur, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Joly F, Pasquier D, Levy C, Mousseau M, D'Almeida MC, Noal S, Le Tinier F, Geffrelot J, Ciais C, Szymczak V, Leon C, Rousselot MP, Darbas S, Hanzen C, Heutte N. 1 Impact of creative art therapy on fatigue and quality of life in patients treated for localized breast cancer: A randomized study. Psychooncology 2022; 31:1412-1419. [PMID: 35488808 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Art therapy (AT) as supportive care may help patients cope with cancer treatments. This non-blinded randomized trial assessed the impact of creative AT on severe fatigue and quality of life (QoL) in localized breast cancer patients undergoing irradiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS 320 patients were randomized to an AT group (ATG) (8 weekly sessions starting during irradiation) or to a standard group (SG). The primary endpoint was severe global fatigue (FACIT-F score <37) at 1 month post-irradiation. QoL (Fact-B), anxiety/depression (HADS) and different dimensions of fatigue (MFI-20) were assessed at 1, 6 and 12 months post-irradiation. The secondary endpoints, fatigue among patients treated with chemotherapy, QoL (Fact-B), anxiety/depression (HADS) and different dimensions of fatigue (MFI-20) at 1, 6 and 12 months post-irradiation (with post hoc analysis in patients with treated with chemotherapy) were also assessed. RESULTS 82% of patients completed ≥8 sessions. Severe initial global fatigue was observed in 43% of patients in each group, and among in 64% of patients whose treatment protocol contained chemotherapy. At 1 month post-irradiation, 45% in the ATG and 57% of patients in the SG reported severe global fatigue (p=0.37); among patients with initial severe mental fatigue (MFF), 79% and 44% had improved MFF (p=0.007) respectively; similarly 79% and 44% with initial poor motivation had better mental motivation (p=0.03). At 6 and 12 months, social well-being scores in the ATG were higher (21.3 and 21.4 vs. 19.8 and 19.2, p=0.05 and p<0.01) with a significant improvement for patients who had chemotherapy (41% vs. 18%, p=0.017). A positive association was observed between the number of AT sessions, fatigue and QoL (p<0.01). CONCLUSION AT did not significantly improve global severe fatigue among all cancer participants one month after radiation therapy, however it had a positive impact on social well-being and may improve mental fatigue and motivation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Joly
- UNICANCER, Centre François Baclesse, Department of Oncology, INSERM, U1086; Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, UMR-S1077, CHU de Caen, Department of Oncology, Caen, France
| | - David Pasquier
- UNICANCER, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille University, CRIStAL UMR, 9181, Lille, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- UNICANCER, Department of Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Sabine Noal
- UNICANCER, Department of Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Julien Geffrelot
- UNICANCER, Department of Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Catherine Ciais
- UNICANCER, Department of Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Viviane Szymczak
- UNICANCER, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille University, CRIStAL UMR 9181, Lille, France
| | - Catherine Leon
- UNICANCER, Department of Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | | | | | - Chantal Hanzen
- UNICANCER, Department of Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Natacha Heutte
- UNICANCER, Department of Clinical Research, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Petit T, Hajjaji N, Antoine EC, Benderra MA, Gozy M, Foa C, Mouysset JL, Grenier J, Mousseau M, Mailliez A, Saghatchian M, Lachaier E, Desmoulins I, Hennequin A, Maes P, Loirat D, Ricci F, Diéras V, Berton D, Tiong FL, Teixeira L, Dohollou N, Lévy C, Bachelot T, Pierga JY. Abstract P2-13-26: Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive metastatic or unresectable breast cancer (BC): First real-life data from the cohort temporary authorization for use (cATU) program in France. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p2-13-26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of an HER2-directed antibody and a topoisomerase I inhibitor covalently linked via a tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. In DESTINY-Breast01, tolerability and efficacy of T-DXd including overall response rate, progression-free survival, duration of response and overall survival have been demonstrated for HER2-positive metastatic and/or unresectable BC in patients (pts) relapsing after 2 or more anti-HER2-based regimens. In France, rapid and fair access to innovative drugs outside clinical trials, prior to their marketing authorization in a given indication, is granted by the French Health Agency, ANSM (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé), through cATU program. Here we report first real world evidence data from cATU program in HER2+ BC pts treated with T-DXd. Methods T-DXd 5.4mg/kg was given intravenously in monotherapy every 3 weeks in HER2-positive metastatic and/or unresectable BC pts who had previously received at least 2 lines of anti-HER2 regimens in the metastatic setting. Eligible pts needed to have normal neutrophil count and no left ventricular dysfunction. Pts with active or history of interstitial lung disease (ILD), pneumonitis, severe pulmonary disease were excluded. Clinical, biological and safety data were collected until the end of cATU, as well as treatment response according to RECIST 1.1., dose modification, treatment interruption and discontinuation. Analysis was performed on March 31th, 2021 on the basis of available collected data. Results From September 30th, 2020 to March 31th, 2021, 155 centers requested at least one ATU for a total of 539 adult pts; 468 requests were accepted and 71 were refused as they did not meet eligibility criteria. T-DXd was received by 459 pts with the following characteristics: 99.1% were women, median age was 58 years, 90.4% had a ECOG score of 0-1, 98.9% had initial HER2-positive BC (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+), 67% were hormone receptor positive. The main sites of metastases were bones (57.3%), lymph nodes (51.6%), lungs (36.2%), liver (33.1%), brain (28.1%) and cutaneous/subcutaneous (13.9%). Median time between initial diagnosis of primary BC and inclusion was 6.6 years (range: 6.6 months - 33.9 years). 81.7% of pts had previously received radiotherapy and 76.5% underwent surgery. The median number of prior cancer regimens in the metastatic setting was 4 (range: 2-22). 21.1% received 2 prior lines of metastatic treatments, 19.6% received 3 lines and 59.3% received 4 lines or more. 94.8% pts received prior trastuzumab emtansine, and 79.3% had prior pertuzumab. During follow-up, data on tumor assessment were available for 160 pts. Of these, 56.7% had complete or partial response and 12.1% had progression. Of the 459 treated pts, 97 pts (21.1%) experienced ≥ 1 Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) including 41 pts (8.9%) with ≥ 1 serious ADR. Most frequent ADRs were related to gastrointestinal toxicity (35.4%). During cATU, 17 cases (3.7%) with ILD or considered as ILD were reported but no cases had a fatal outcome (only grade 1 or 2 when reported by physicians). 13 fatal cases were reported (no drug-related deaths, attributed by physician). ADRs leading to T-DXd discontinuation were reported in 4 pts (0.9%). Dose reductions were reported in 17 pts (3.7%) and 21 pts (4.6%) had temporary interruptions. Conclusions We report here the first real world data from the French cATU in HER2-positive BC pts treated by T-DXd. The enrolment of 468 pts in 6 months illustrated the unmet medical need for this population. T-DXd had antitumor activity with a similar response rate to that reported in previous clinical studies. T-DXd was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed.
Citation Format: Thierry Petit, Nawale Hajjaji, Eric-Charles Antoine, Marc-Antoine Benderra, Michel Gozy, Cyril Foa, Jean-Loup Mouysset, Julien Grenier, Mireille Mousseau, Audrey Mailliez, Mahasti Saghatchian, Emma Lachaier, Isabelle Desmoulins, Audrey Hennequin, Patricia Maes, Delphine Loirat, Francesco Ricci, Véronique Diéras, Dominique Berton, Florence Lai Tiong, Luis Teixeira, Nadine Dohollou, Christelle Lévy, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Yves Pierga. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive metastatic or unresectable breast cancer (BC): First real-life data from the cohort temporary authorization for use (cATU) program in France [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-26.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Petit
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nawale Hajjaji
- Département de Cancérologie Sénologique, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | | | | - Michel Gozy
- Département de Radiothérapie-Oncologie, Clinique de l’Europe, Amiens, France
| | - Cyril Foa
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Saint-Joseph, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Loup Mouysset
- Département de Cancérologie, Hôpital Privé de Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France
| | - Julien Grenier
- Unité Oncologie Sein-Gynécologie, Institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon, France
| | | | - Audrey Mailliez
- Département de Cancérologie Sénologique, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Mahasti Saghatchian
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Américain de Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| | - Emma Lachaier
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, CHU Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Audrey Hennequin
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Patricia Maes
- Département d’Oncologie, Hôpital Privé Le Bois, Lille, France
| | - Delphine Loirat
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Ricci
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Diéras
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Dominique Berton
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | - Luis Teixeira
- Breast Disease Unit, APHP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Pathophysiology of Breast Cancer Team, Université de Paris, INSERM U976, HIPI, Paris, France
| | - Nadine Dohollou
- Service d’Oncologie Médicale, Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christelle Lévy
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ferraioli D, Bally O, Meeus P, Benayoun D, Bakrin N, De Saint Hilaire P, Beal Ardisson D, Provençal J, Barletta H, Mousseau M, Chauleur C, Verbaere S, Knibiehly A, Fuso L, Charreton A, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Chopin N, Glehen O, Labrosse-Canat H, Farsi F, Ray-Coquard I. Impact of multidisciplinary tumour board in the management of ovarian carcinoma in the first-line setting. Exhaustive analysis from the Rhone-Alpes region. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 29:e13313. [PMID: 32894629 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a poor prognosis disease partly linked to diagnosis at an advanced stage. The quality of care management is a factor that needs to be explored, more specifically optimal organisation of first-line treatment. METHODS A retrospective study, dealing with all patients diagnosed within the Rhone-Alpes region with initial diagnosis EOC in 2012, was performed. The aim was to describe the impact of multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTB) in the organisation of care and the consequence on the patient's outcomes. RESULTS 271 EOC were analysed. 206 patients had an advanced EOC. Median progression-free survival (PFS) is 17.8 months (CI95%, 14.6-21.2) for AOC. 157 patients (57.9%) had a front-line surgery versus 114 patients (42.1%) interval debulking surgery. PFS for AOC patients with no residual disease is 24.3 months compared with 15.3 months for patients with residual disease (p = .01). No macroscopic residual disease is more frequent in the patients discussed before surgery in MTB compared with patients not submitted before surgery (73% vs. 56.2%, p < .001). CONCLUSION These results highlight the heterogeneity of medical practices in terms of front-line surgery versus interval surgery, in the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in the setting of MTB discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Ferraioli
- Gynecology Department, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa and IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Olivia Bally
- Oncology Department, Private Hospital Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Meeus
- Surgical Department, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - David Benayoun
- Oncology Department, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Surgical Department, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | - Hugues Barletta
- Surgical Department, Private Hospital Drome Ardeche, Valence, France
| | - Mireille Mousseau
- Surgical Department, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Céline Chauleur
- Oncology Department, Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Sylvain Verbaere
- Surgical Department, Private Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Alain Knibiehly
- Surgical Department, Hospital of Montelimar, Montelimar, France
| | - Luca Fuso
- Gynecology Oncology Department, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicolas Chopin
- Gynecology Department, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Surgical Department, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Fadila Farsi
- Regional Network of Cancer (ONCO AuRA), Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Broche C, Pralong P, Gil H, Mousseau M, Chatain C, Jacquier JP, Charles J, Leccia MT. Érythème pigmenté fixe au fulvestrant (Faslodex®) confirmé par patch-tests : premier cas rapporté. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2018.09.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
8
|
Dantigny R, Tanty A, Fourneret P, Genin N, Bayet-Papin B, Mousseau M, Hau Desbat NH. Prévalence de la douleur en radiothérapie et amélioration de sa prise en charge. Bull Cancer 2018; 105:1183-1192. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
9
|
Broche C, Pralong P, Gil H, Yahiaoui N, Mousseau M, Chatain C, Jacquier JP, Charles J, Leccia MT. Fixed drug eruption caused by fulvestrant confirmed by skin tests: First case. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 80:184-186. [PMID: 30461027 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Revised: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 10/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Clémentine Broche
- Dermatology, Allergology and Photobiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Pauline Pralong
- Dermatology, Allergology and Photobiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Hugo Gil
- Anatomopathology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Nassima Yahiaoui
- Regional Pharmacovigilance, Addictovigilance Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Mireille Mousseau
- Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Catharina Chatain
- Dermatology, Allergology and Photobiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Jacquier
- Dermatology, Allergology and Photobiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Julie Charles
- Dermatology, Allergology and Photobiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Marie-Thérèse Leccia
- Dermatology, Allergology and Photobiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aparicio T, Ducreux M, Faroux R, Barbier E, Manfredi S, Lecomte T, Etienne PL, Bedenne L, Bennouna J, Phelip JM, François E, Michel P, Legoux JL, Gasmi M, Breysacher G, Rougier P, De Gramont A, Lepage C, Bouché O, Seitz JF, Adenis A, Alessio A, Aouakli A, Azzedine A, Bedjaoui A, Bidault A, Blanchi A, Botton A, Cadier-Lagnes A, Fatisse A, Gagnaire A, Gilbert A, Gueye A, Hollebecque A, Lemaire A, Mahamat A, Marre A, Patenotte A, Rotenberg A, Roussel A, Thirot-Bidault A, Votte A, Weber A, Zaanan A, Dupont-Gossart A, Villing A, Queuniet A, Coudert B, Denis B, Garcia B, Lafforgue B, Landi B, Leduc B, Linot B, Paillot B, Rhein B, Winkfield B, Barberis C, Becht C, Belletier C, Berger C, Bineau C, Borel C, Brezault C, Buffet C, Cornila C, Couffon C, De La Fouchardière C, Giraud C, Lecaille C, Lepere C, Lobry C, Locher C, Lombard-Bohas C, Paoletti C, Platini C, Rebischung C, Sarda C, Vilain C, Briac-Levaché C, Auby D, Baudet-Klepping D, Bechade D, Besson D, Cleau D, Festin D, Gargot D, Genet D, Goldfain D, Luet D, Malka D, Peré-Vergé D, Pillon D, Sevin-Robiche D, Smith D, Soubrane D, Tougeron D, Zylberait D, Carola E, Cuillerier E, Dorval Danquechin E, Echinard E, Janssen E, Maillard E, Mitry E, Norguet-Monnereau E, Suc E, Terrebonne E, Zrihen E, Pariente E, Almaric F, Audemar F, Bonnetain F, Desseigne F, Dewaele F, Di Fiore F, Ghiringhelli F, Husseini F, Khemissa F, Kikolski F, Morvan F, Petit-Laurent F, Riot F, Subtil F, Zerouala-Boussaha F, Caroli-Bosc F, Boilleau-Jolimoy G, Bordes G, Cavaglione G, Coulanjon G, Deplanque G, Gatineau-Saillant G, Goujon G, Medinger G, Roquin G, Brixi-Benmansour H, Castanie H, Lacroix H, Maechel H, Perrier H, Salloum H, Senellart H, Baumgaertner I, Cumin I, Graber I, Trouilloud I, Boutin J, Butel J, Charneau J, Cretin J, Dauba J, Deguiral J, Egreteau J, Ezenfis J, Forestier J, Goineau J, Lacourt J, Lafon J, Martin J, Meunier J, Moreau J, Provencal J, Taieb J, Thaury J, Tuaillon J, Vergniol J, Villand J, Vincent J, Volet J, Bachet J, Barbare J, Souquet J, Grangé J, Dor J, Paitel J, Jouve J, Raoul J, Cheula J, Gornet J, Sabate J, Vantelon J, Vaillant J, Aucouturier J, Barbieux J, Herr J, Lafargue J, Lagasse J, Latrive J, Plachot J, Ramain J, Robin J, Spano J, Douillard J, Beerblock K, Bouhier-Leporrier K, Slimane Fawzi K, Cany L, Chone L, Dahan L, Gasnault L, Rob L, Stefani L, Wander L, Baconnier M, Ben Abdelghani M, Benchalal M, Blasquez M, Carreiro M, Charbit M, Combe M, Duluc M, Fayolle M, Gignoux M, Giovannini M, Glikmanas M, Mabro M, Mignot M, Mornet M, Mousseau M, Mozer M, Pauwels M, Pelletier M, Porneuf M, Ramdani M, Schnee M, Tissot M, Zawadi M, Clavero-Fabri M, Gouttebel M, Kaminsky M, Galais M, Abdelli N, Barrière N, Bouaria N, Bouarioua N, Delas N, Gérardin N, Hess-Laurens N, Stremsdoerfer N, Berthelet O, Boulat O, Capitain O, Favre O, Amoyal P, Bergerault P, Burtin P, Cassan P, Chatrenet P, Chiappa P, Claudé P, Couzigou P, Feydy P, Follana P, Geoffroy P, Godeau P, Hammel P, Laplaige P, Lehair P, Martin P, Novello P, Pantioni P, Pienkowski P, Pouderoux P, Prost P, Ruszniewski P, Souillac P, Texereau P, Thévenet P, Haineaux P, Benoit R, Coriat R, Lamy R, Mackiewicz R, Beorchia S, Chaussade S, Hiret S, Jacquot S, Lavau Denes S, Montembault S, Nahon S, Nasca S, Nguyen S, Oddou-Lagraniere S, Pesque-Penaud S, Fratte S, Chatellier T, Mansourbakht T, Morin T, Walter T, Boige V, Bourgeois V, Derias V, Guérin-Meyer V, Hautefeuille V, Jestin Le Tallec V, Lorgis V, Quentin V, Sebbagh V, Veuillez V, Adhoute X, Coulaud X, Becouarn Y, Coscas Y, Courouble Y, Le Bricquir Y, Molin Y, Rinaldi Y, Lam Y, Ladhib Z. Overweight is associated to a better prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of FFCD trials. Eur J Cancer 2018; 98:1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2018] [Revised: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
11
|
Gligorov J, Ataseven B, Verrill M, De Laurentiis M, Jung K, Azim H, Al-Sakaff N, Lauer S, Shing M, Pivot X, Koroveshi D, Bouzid K, Casalnuovo M, Cascallar D, Korbenfeld EP, Bastick P, Beith J, Colosimo M, Friedlander M, Ganju V, Green M, Patterson K, Redfern A, Richardson G, Ceric T, Gordana K, Beato CA, Ferrari M, Hegg R, Helena V, Ismael GF, Lessa AE, Mano M, Morelle A, Nogueira JA, Timcheva K, Tomova A, Tsakova M, Zlatareva-Petrova A, Asselah J, Assi H, Brezden-Masley C, Chia S, Freedman O, Harb M, Joy AA, Kulkarni S, Prady C, Gaete AAA, Matamala L, Torres R, Yanez E, Franco S, Urrego M, Gugić D, Vrbanec D, Melichar B, Prausová J, Vyzula R, Pilarte RG, León MI, Muñoz R, Ramos G, Azeem HA, Aziz AA, El Zawahry H, Osegueda FR, Alexandre J, Artignan X, Barletta H, Beguier E, Berdah JF, Marty CB, Bollet M, Bourgeois H, Bressac C, Burki F, Campone M, Coeffic D, Cojocarasu OZ, Dagada C, Dalenc F, Del Piano F, Desauw C, Desmoulins I, Dohollou N, Egreteau J, Ferrero JM, Foa C, Garidi R, Gasnault L, Gligorov J, Guardiola E, Hamizi S, Jarcau R, Jacquin JP, Jaubert D, Jolimoy G, Mineur HL, Largillier R, Leduc B, Martin P, Melis A, Monge J, Moullet I, Mousseau M, Nguyen S, Orfeuvre H, Petit T, Pivot X, Priou F, Bach IS, Simon H, Stefani L, Uwer L, Youssef A, Aktas B, von der Assen A, Augustin D, Balser C, Bauer LE, Bechtner C, Beyer G, Brucker C, Bückner U, Busch S, Christensen B, Deryal M, Farrokh A, Faust E, Friedrichs K, Graf H, Griesshammer M, Grischke EM, Hänle C, Heider A, Henschen S, Hesse T, Jackisch C, Kisro J, Köhler A, Kuemmel S, Lampe D, Lantzsch T, Latos K, Lex B, Liedtke C, Luedders D, Maintz C, Müller V, Overkamp F, Park-Simon TW, Paul M, Prechtl A, Ringsdorf U, Runnebaum I, Ruth S, Salat C, Scheffen I, Schilling J, Schmatloch S, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schrader I, Seipelt G, Simon E, Stefek A, Stickeler E, Thill M, Tio J, Tuczek A, Warm M, Weigel M, Wischnik A, Wojcinski S, Ziegler-Löhr K, Aravantinos G, Ardavanis A, Fountzilas G, Gogas H, Kakolyris S, Mavroudis D, Papadimitriou C, Papandreou C, Papazisis K, Castro H, Hernandez-Monroy CE, Ngan R, Yeo W, Bittner N, Boer K, Csejtei A, Horvath Z, Kocsis J, Mangel LC, Mezei K, Nagy Z, Szanto J, Atmakusuma D, Fadjari H, Kurnianda D, Prayogo N, Tanggo EH, Coate L, Hennessy B, Kelly C, Martin M, Nasim S, O'Connor M, Aieta M, Allegrini G, Amadori D, Bidoli P, Biti G, Bordonaro R, Bottini A, Carterni G, Cavanna L, Cazzaniga M, Cognetti F, Contu A, Cruciani G, Donadio M, Falcone A, Farci D, Forcignanò RC, Frassoldati A, Gaion F, Gamucci T, Giotta F, de Laurentiis M, Livi L, Lorusso V, Maiello E, Marchetti P, Mariani G, Mion M, Moscetti L, Musolino A, Pazzola A, Pedrazzoli P, Pigi A, de Placido S, Caremoli ER, Santoro A, Tienghi A, Ahn JS, Jung KH, Lee KS, Lee SH, Seo JH, Sohn JH, Cesas A, Juozaityte E, Cheah NLC, Chong FLT, Devi BC, Phua V, Teoh D, Ching LW, Yusof M, Corona J, Dominguez A, Mendoza RLG, Hernandez CA, Ramiro AJ, Santos JM, Espinosa PM, Villarreal Garza CM, Errihani H, Bakker S, van den Berkmortel F, Blaisse R, Huinink DTB, van den Bosch J, Braun J, Dercksen M, Droogendijk H, Erdkamp F, Haringhuizen A, de Jongh F, Kok T, Los M, Madretsma S, Terwogt JMM, van der Padt A, van Rossum-Schornagel QC, Smilde T, de Valk B, van der Velden A, van Warmerdam L, van de Wouw A, North R, Kersten C, Mjaaland I, Wist E, Aziz Z, Masood N, Rashid K, Shah M, Alcedo JC, Aleman D, Neciosup S, Reategui R, Valdiviezo N, Vera L, Fernando G, Roque F, Strebel HM, Krzemieniecki K, Litwiniuk M, Mruk A, Pienkowski T, Sawrycki P, Slomian G, Tomczak P, Afonso N, Cardoso F, Damasceno M, Nave M, Badulescu F, Ciule L, Curescu S, Eniu A, Filip D, Grecea D, Jinga DC, Lungulescu D, Oprean CM, Stanculeanu DL, Turdean M, Dvornichenko V, Emelyanov S, Lichinitser M, Manikhas A, Sakaeva D, Shirinkin V, Stroyakovskiy D, Abulkhair O, Zekri J, Filipovic S, Kovcin V, Nedovic J, Pesic J, Vasovic S, Ng R, Bystricky B, Leskova J, Mardiak J, Mišurová E, Wagnerova M, Takač I, Demetriou GS, Dreosti L, Govender P, Jordaan JP, Veersamy P, Romero JLA, Lopez NB, Arias CC, Chacon J, Aramburo AF, Morales LAF, Garcia M, Estevez LG, Garcia-Palomo Perez A, Garcia Saenz JA, Garcia Sanchis L, Cubells LG, Cortijo LG, Santiago SG, De Aranguiz BHF, Mañas JJI, Gallego PJ, Cussac AL, Ferrandiz CL, Garrido ML, Alvarez PL, Vega JML, Del Prado PM, Jañez NM, Murillo SM, Rosales AM, Jaso LM, Fernandez IP, Martorell AP, Carrion RP, Simon SP, Alcibar AP, Lorenzo JP, Garcia VQ, Asensio TRYC, Maicas MDT, Villanueva Silva MJ, Killander F, Svensson JH, Fehr M, Hauser N, Müller A, Pagani O, Passmann-Kegel H, Popescu R, Rabaglio M, Rauch D, Schlatter C, Zaman K, Chang TW, Huang CS, Wang HC, Yu JC, Bandidwattanawong C, Maneechavakajorn J, Seetalarom K, Dejthevaporn T(S, Somwangprasert A, Vongsaisuwon M, Akbulut H, Altundag K, Arican A, Bozcuk H, Eralp Y, Idris M, Isikdogan A, Senol CH, Sevinc A, Uygun K, Yucel E, Yucel I, Yumuk F, Shparyk Y, Voitko N, Jaloudi M, Adams J, Agrawal R, Ahmed S, Alhasso A, Allerton R, Anwar S, Archer C, Ashford R, Barraclough L, Bertelli G, Bishop J, Branson T, Butt M, Chakrabarti A, Chakraborti P, Churn M, Crowley C, Davis R, Dhadda A, Eldeeb H, Fraser J, Hall J, Hickish T, Hogg M, Howe T, Joffe J, Kelleher M, Kelly S, Kendall A, Kristeleit H, Lumsden G, Macmillan C, MacPherson I, Malik Z, Mithal N, Neal A, Panwar U, Proctor A, Proctor SJ, Raj S, Rehman S, Sandri I, Scatchard K, Sherwin E, Sims E, Singer J, Smith S, Tahir S, Taylor W, Tsalic M, Verrill M, Wardley A, Waters S, Wheatley D, Wright K, Yuille F, Alonso I, Artagaveytia N, Rodriguez R, Arbona E, Garcia Y, Lion L, Marcano D, Van Thuan T. Safety and tolerability of subcutaneous trastuzumab for the adjuvant treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive early breast cancer: SafeHer phase III study's primary analysis of 2573 patients. Eur J Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Boyer JC, Beroud C, Mbatchi L, van Kuilenburg A, Bobin-Dubigeon C, Thomas F, Chatelut E, Merlin JL, Pinguet F, Ferrand C, Meijer J, Evrard A, Llorca L, Romieu G, Follana P, Bachelot T, Chaigneau L, Pivot X, Dieras V, Largillier R, Mousseau M, Goncalves A, Roché H, Bonneterre J, Servent V, Dohollou N, Château Y, Chamorey E, Desvignes JP, Salgado D, Ferrero JM, Milano G. New advances in DPYD genotype and risk of severe toxicity under capecitabine. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0175998. [PMID: 28481884 PMCID: PMC5421769 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme is the main cause of severe and lethal fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. Various approaches have been developed for DPD-deficiency screening, including DPYD genotyping and phenotyping. The goal of this prospective observational study was to perform exhaustive exome DPYD sequencing and to examine relationships between DPYD variants and toxicity in advanced breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine. Methods Two-hundred forty-three patients were analysed (88.5% capecitabine monotherapy). Grade 3 and grade 4 capecitabine-related digestive and/or neurologic and/or hemato-toxicities were observed in 10.3% and 2.1% of patients, respectively. DPYD exome, along with flanking intronic regions 3’UTR and 5’UTR, were sequenced on MiSeq Illumina. DPD phenotype was assessed by pre-treatment plasma uracil (U) and dihydrouracil (UH2) measurement. Results Among the 48 SNPs identified, 19 were located in coding regions, including 3 novel variations, each observed in a single patient (among which, F100L and A26T, both pathogenic in silico). Combined analysis of deleterious variants *2A, I560S (*13) and D949V showed significant association with grade 3–4 toxicity (sensitivity 16.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) 71.4%, relative risk (RR) 6.7, p<0.001) but not with grade 4 toxicity. Considering additional deleterious coding variants D342G, S492L, R592W and F100L increased the sensitivity to 26.7% for grade 3–4 toxicity (PPV 72.7%, RR 7.6, p<0.001), and was significantly associated with grade 4 toxicity (sensitivity 60%, PPV 27.3%, RR 31.4, p = 0.001), suggesting the clinical relevance of extended targeted DPYD genotyping. As compared to extended genotype, combining genotyping (7 variants) and phenotyping (U>16 ng/ml) did not substantially increase the sensitivity, while impairing PPV and RR. Conclusions Exploring an extended set of deleterious DPYD variants improves the performance of DPYD genotyping for predicting both grade 3–4 and grade 4 toxicities (digestive and/or neurologic and/or hematotoxicities) related to capecitabine, as compared to conventional genotyping restricted to consensual variants *2A, *13 and D949V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christophe Beroud
- Aix-Marseille University, INSERM UMR S910, GMGF, Marseille, France
- APHM Hôpital Timone, Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Marseille, France
| | - Litaty Mbatchi
- Faculté de Pharmacie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - André van Kuilenburg
- Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam,The Netherlands
| | | | - Fabienne Thomas
- Institut Claudius-Regaud, CRCT, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Etienne Chatelut
- Institut Claudius-Regaud, CRCT, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Louis Merlin
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, UMR CNRS 7039 CRAN, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | | | - Judith Meijer
- Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam,The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Henri Roché
- Institut Claudius-Regaud, CRCT, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Salgado
- Aix-Marseille University, INSERM UMR S910, GMGF, Marseille, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kastler A, Krainik A, Sakhri L, Mousseau M, Kastler B. Feasibility of Real-Time Intraprocedural Temperature Control during Bone Metastasis Thermal Microwave Ablation: A Bicentric Retrospective Study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28:366-371. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Revised: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 09/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
|
14
|
Joly F, Pasquier D, Hanzen C, Heutte N, Levy C, Le Tinier F, Mousseau M, Ciais C, Murariu C, D'almeida MC, Szymczak V, Leon C, Darbas S, Rousselot MP, Mineur S, Rieux C, Leconte A, Rigal O, Clarisse B, Allouache D. Impact of art therapy (AT) on fatigue and quality of life (QoL) during adjuvant external beam irradiation (EBI) in breast cancer patients (pts): a randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw390.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
15
|
Pluchart H, Jacquet E, Charlety D, Allenet B, Bedouch P, Mousseau M. Long-Term Survivor with Intrathecal and Intravenous Trastuzumab Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer. Target Oncol 2016; 11:687-691. [DOI: 10.1007/s11523-016-0429-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Bonnefoi H, Grellety T, Tredan O, Saghatchian M, Dalenc F, Mailliez A, L'Haridon T, Cottu P, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, You B, Mousseau M, Dauba J, Del Piano F, Desmoulins I, Coussy F, Madranges N, Grenier J, Bidard FC, Proudhon C, MacGrogan G, Orsini C, Pulido M, Gonçalves A. A phase II trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with triple-negative androgen receptor positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (UCBG 12-1). Ann Oncol 2016; 27:812-8. [PMID: 27052658 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 193] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2015] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several expression array studies identified molecular apocrine breast cancer (BC) as a subtype that expresses androgen receptor (AR) but not estrogen receptor α. We carried out a multicentre single-arm phase II trial in women with AR-positive, estrogen, progesterone receptor and HER2-negative (triple-negative) metastatic or inoperable locally advanced BC to assess the efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with a metastatic or locally advanced, centrally reviewed, triple-negative and AR-positive (≥10% by immunohistochemistry, IHC) BC were eligible. Any number of previous lines of chemotherapy was allowed. AA (1000 mg) was administered once a day with prednisone (5 mg) twice a day until disease progression or intolerance. The primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 6 months defined as the proportion of patients presenting a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. Secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS One hundred and forty-six patients from 27 centres consented for IHC central review. Of the 138 patients with sufficient tissue available, 53 (37.6%) were AR-positive and triple-negative, and 34 of them were included from July 2013 to December 2014. Thirty patients were eligible and evaluable for the primary end point. The 6-month CBR was 20.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.7%-38.6%], including 1 CR and 5 SD ≥6 months, 5 of them still being under treatment at the time of analysis (6.4+, 9.2+, 14.5+, 17.6+, 23.4+ months). The ORR was 6.7% (95% CI 0.8%-22.1%). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.7%-5.4%). Fatigue, hypertension, hypokalaemia and nausea were the most common drug-related adverse events; the majority of them being grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS AA plus prednisone treatment is beneficial for some patients with molecular apocrine tumours and five patients are still on treatment. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NCT01842321.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Bonnefoi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié Unicancer, Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM U916, INSERM CIC1401, Bordeaux
| | - T Grellety
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié Unicancer, Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM U916, INSERM CIC1401, Bordeaux
| | - O Tredan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon
| | - M Saghatchian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Cancer Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - F Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse
| | - A Mailliez
- Department of Breast Cancer, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - T L'Haridon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée, La Roche sur Yon
| | - P Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris
| | | | - B You
- Department of Medical Oncology, Teaching Hospital, Lyon-Sud University, Lyon
| | - M Mousseau
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble
| | - J Dauba
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Layné, Mont-de-Marsan
| | - F Del Piano
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpital du Leman, Thonon-Les-Bains
| | - I Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon
| | - F Coussy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, St Cloud
| | - N Madranges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié Unicancer, Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM U916, INSERM CIC1401, Bordeaux
| | - J Grenier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon
| | - F C Bidard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris
| | - C Proudhon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris
| | - G MacGrogan
- Department of Pathology, Institut Bergonié, INSERM U916, Bordeaux
| | | | - M Pulido
- Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonié, INSERM CIC1401, Bordeaux
| | - A Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Cancer Research Center of Marseille, INSERM U7258, CNRS U1068, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tinckam KJ, Liwski R, Pochinco D, Mousseau M, Grattan A, Nickerson P, Campbell P. cPRA Increases With DQA, DPA, and DPB Unacceptable Antigens in the Canadian cPRA Calculator. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:3194-201. [PMID: 26080906 PMCID: PMC4744749 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2015] [Revised: 03/26/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
A calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) estimates the percentage of donors with unacceptable antigens (UA) for a recipient. cPRA may be underestimated in transplant candidates with UA to DQA, DPA, and DPB if these are not included in the calculation program. To serve the National Canadian Transplant Programs, a cPRA calculator was developed with complete molecular typing for all donors at HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/4/5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1, all resolved to serologic equivalents. The prevalence of UA at DQA, DPA and DPB was evaluated in a sensitized regional population. The impact of adding these additional UA to cPRA was calculated alone and in combination, and compared to the baseline cPRA for UA at A, B, C, DR, DR51/52/53, and DQ. Of 740 sensitized transplant candidates, 18% of total and 32% with cPRA≥95% had DQA UA. Twenty-seven percent of total and 54% with cPRA≥95% had DPB UA. Of 280/740 subjects with these UA, 36/280 (13%) had cPRA increase of >20% when they were included, 7% increased cPRA to ≥80% and 6% to ≥95%. Inclusion of DQA, DPA, and DPB UA in Canadian cPRA calculations improves the accuracy of cPRA where these are relevant in allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Tinckam
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and HLA Laboratory, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian Blood Services, Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Liwski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - D Pochinco
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Diagnostic Services Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - M Mousseau
- Canadian Blood Services, Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Grattan
- Canadian Blood Services, Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - P Nickerson
- Canadian Blood Services, Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Diagnostic Services Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - P Campbell
- Division of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Boyer JC, Llorca L, Romieu G, Bachelot TD, Dieras V, Merlin JL, Pinguet F, Thomas F, Ferrand C, Bobin-Dubigeon C, Pivot XB, Largillier R, Mousseau M, Goncalves A, Roche HH, Ciccolini J, Ferrero JM, Milano GA. Exhaustive single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of DPYD exome in breast cancer patients (pts) receiving capecitabine. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.2571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean-Louis Merlin
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Service de Biopathologie, CNRS UMR 7039 CRAN Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joseph Ciccolini
- Transfert Oncology Laboratory, Nord University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department d'Oncologie Medicale, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pivot X, Gligorov J, Müller V, Curigliano G, Knoop A, Verma S, Jenkins V, Scotto N, Osborne S, Fallowfield L, Jenkins V, Kilkerr J, Langridge C, Monson K, Jakobsen EH, Nielsen MH, Linnet S, Knoop A, Pivot X, Bonnefoi H, Mousseau M, Zelek L, Bourgeois H, Lefeuvre CP, Bachelot T, Petit T, Brain E, Levy C, Gligorov J, Augustin D, Graf H, Heinrich G, Kroening H, Kuemmel S, Müller V, Overkamp F, Park-Simon TW, Schmidt M, Perlova-Griff L, Wolf C, Colleoni M, Ballestrero A, Bernardo A, Ribecco AS, Gianni L, Curigliano G, Brewczynska E, Jassem J, Shirinkin V, Manikhas A, Dvornichenko V, Lichinitser M, Semiglazov V, Mukhametshina G, Bulavina I, Arranz EE, Ocon FC, Vivanco GL, Bofill JS, Quintela IP, Muñoz AS, Pérez YF, Espinosa JC, Alvarez JV, del Prado RL, De Merino LC, García JMP, Frances SE, Edlund P, Norberg B, Wennstig AK, Lind P, Hauser N, Tausch C, Camci C, Arpaci F, Abali H, Uslu R, Tahir S, Wheatley D, Chan S, Barrett-Lee P, McAdam K, Simcock R, Burcombe R, El-Maraghi R, Califaretti N, Spadafora S, Sehdev S, Sami A, Verma S. Patients' preferences for subcutaneous trastuzumab versus conventional intravenous infusion for the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of 488 patients in the international, randomized, two-cohort PrefHer study. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:1979-1987. [PMID: 25070545 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) preferred subcutaneous (s.c.) trastuzumab, delivered via single-use injection device (SID), over the intravenous (i.v.) formulation (Cohort 1 of the PrefHer study: NCT01401166). Here, we report patient preference, healthcare professional satisfaction, and safety data pooled from Cohort 1 and also Cohort 2, where s.c. trastuzumab was delivered via hand-held syringe. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomized to receive four adjuvant cycles of 600 mg fixed-dose s.c. trastuzumab followed by four cycles of standard i.v. trastuzumab, or vice versa. The primary endpoint was overall preference proportions for s.c. or i.v., assessed by patient interviews in the evaluable ITT population. RESULTS A total of 245 patients were randomized to receive s.c. followed by i.v. and 243 received i.v. followed by s.c. (evaluable ITT populations: 235 and 232 patients, respectively). s.c. was preferred by 415/467 [88.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 85.7-91.6; P < 0.0001; two-sided test against null hypothesis of 65% s.c. preference]; 45/467 preferred i.v. (9.6%; 95% CI 7-13); 7/467 indicated no preference (1.5%; 95% CI 1-3). Clinician-reported adverse events occurred in 292/479 (61.0%) and 245/478 (51.3%) patients during the pooled s.c. and i.v. periods, respectively (P < 0.05; 2 × 2 χ(2)); 16 patients (3.3%) in each period experienced grade 3 events; none were grade 4/5. CONCLUSIONS PrefHer revealed compelling and consistent patient preferences for s.c. over i.v. trastuzumab, regardless of SID or hand-held syringe delivery. s.c. was well tolerated and safety was consistent with previous reports, including the HannaH study (NCT00950300). No new safety signals were identified compared with the known i.v. profile in EBC. PrefHer and HannaH confirm that s.c. trastuzumab is a validated and preferred option over i.v. for improving patients' care in HER2-positive breast cancer. CLINICALTRIALSGOV REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01401166.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Pivot
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon.
| | - J Gligorov
- Medical Oncology Department, APHP Hôpital Tenon, Paris; UPMC, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Paris, France
| | - V Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - G Curigliano
- Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - A Knoop
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S Verma
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - V Jenkins
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | - N Scotto
- Global Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - S Osborne
- Global Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - L Fallowfield
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Toffart AC, Sakhri L, Duruisseaux M, Shestaeva O, Giroud M, Mercier-Cubizolles V, Courby S, Schwebel C, Carlin N, Grünwald D, Moro-Sibilot D, Mousseau M, Laval G. Pathologie avancée et défaillances d’organes : outil d’aide à la décision. Médecine Palliative : Soins de Support - Accompagnement - Éthique 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medpal.2013.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
21
|
Milano G, Ferrero JM, Thomas F, Bobin-Dubigeon C, Merlin JL, Pinguet F, Ferrand C, Boyer JC, Romieu G, Bachelot T, Pivot X, Dieras V, Largillier R, Mousseau M, Goncalves A, Roche H, Bonneterre J, De Clercq B, Etienne-Grimaldi MC. Abstract P3-15-04: A French prospective pilot study to identify dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p3-15-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Health Authorities point out that DPD deficiency confers a significant risk of major toxicity for patients receiving capecitabine. Identification of at-risk patients is thus of major concern. This multicentric prospective study of the French GPCO group (Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique, Unicancer) evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of DPD phenotyping and genotyping to predict severe cap-related toxixity in metastatic breast cancer patients.
Methods: 303 patients were included between February 2009 and February 2011 (15 institutions). Eighty-eight% received capecitabine as monotherapy, 28% were treated as first line (mean dose at 1st cycle 1957 mg/m2/d). Pre-treatment uracil (U, physiological DPD substrate) plasma concentration was measured in 286 patients (HPLC assay). DPD genotyping (IVS14+1G>A, 2846A>T, 1679T>G, 464T>A) was performed on 281 patients. Severe toxicity (G3-4 CTCAE v3 criteria) was measured over cycles 1-2.
Results: Grade 3-4 toxicity (diarrhea, vomiting, hematoxicity, hand-foot syndrome) has been observed in 19.6% of patients (one toxic death). A marked trend for higher U concentrations has been noted in patients developing severe toxicity vs those who didn't (median 12.7 ng/ml (Q1-Q3 9-17) vs median 10.2 ng/ml (range 8-13), respectively, p = 0.014). However, ROC curve has showed that this difference was too small for use as a reliable toxicity predictor. The patient with toxic death had an elevated U concentration at 17 ng/ml. Among the 7 patients with a DPD mutation (3 pts IVS14+1, 3 pts 2846A>T, one 1679T>G, all heterozygous), 5 developed severe toxicity (including the toxic death, 2846A>T), one did not, and the last one was not documented. Relative risk for developing severe toxicity was 4.60 in mutated patients vs wild-type patients (95%CI 2.95-7.16, p = 0.001); positive and negative predictive values were 83.3% and 81.9%, respectively; specificity was 99.5% and sensitivity was 9.8%.
Conclusions: Breast cancer patients harbouring a DPD variant allele are at risk to develop severe, up to lethal, capecitabine-related toxicity. Pre-treatment U measurement remains to be more firmly established as a reliable predictor of capecitabine toxicity. These observations are of major interest for breast cancer patients candidate for capecitabine therapy.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-15-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Milano
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - J-M Ferrero
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - F Thomas
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - C Bobin-Dubigeon
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - J-L Merlin
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - F Pinguet
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - C Ferrand
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - J-C Boyer
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - G Romieu
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - T Bachelot
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - X Pivot
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - V Dieras
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - R Largillier
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - M Mousseau
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - A Goncalves
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - H Roche
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - J Bonneterre
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - B De Clercq
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - M-C Etienne-Grimaldi
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Clauduis-Regaud, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie du de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France; Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France; CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France; Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Delbaldo C, Serin D, Mousseau M, Greget S, Audhuy B, Priou F, Berdah JF, Teissier E, Laplaige P, Zelek L, Quinaux E, Buyse M, Piedbois P. A phase III adjuvant randomised trial of 6 cycles of 5-fluorouracil-epirubicine-cyclophosphamide (FEC100) versus 4 FEC 100 followed by 4 Taxol (FEC-T) in node positive breast cancer patients (Trial B2000). Eur J Cancer 2013; 50:23-30. [PMID: 24183460 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2013] [Revised: 08/16/2013] [Accepted: 09/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for patients with node positive (N+) breast cancer consisted of anthracycline followed by taxane. The European Association for Research in Oncology embarked in 2000 on a phase III trial comparing 6 cycles of FEC100 versus 4 FEC100 followed by 4 Taxol. Primary end-point was disease free survival. Secondary end-points were overall survival, local recurrence free interval, metastases free interval and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between March 2000 and December 2002, 837 patients were randomised between 6FEC100 for 6 cycles (417patients) or FEC100 for 4 cycles then Taxol 175mg/m(2)/3 weeks for 4 cycles (4FEC100-4T) (420 patients). One thousand patients had been planned initially but the trial was closed earlier due to slow accrual. RESULTS Hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.99 for disease-free survival (DFS) (95%CI: 0.77-1.26; p=0.91), and 0.85 for overall survival (OS) (95%CI: 0.62-1.15; p=0.29). Nine-year DFS were 62.9% versus 62.5% for 6FEC100 and 4FEC100-4T, respectively. Nine-year OS were 73.9% versus 77% for 6FEC100 and 4FEC100-4T, respectively. Toxicity analyses based on 803 evaluable patients showed that overall grade 3-4 toxicities were similar in both arms (63% versus 58% for 6FEC100 arm and 4FEC100-4T arm, respectively; p=0.16). CONCLUSION In this trial replacing the last 2 FEC100 cycles of 6FEC100 regimen by 4 Taxol does not lead to a discernable DFS or OS advantage. The lack of a significant difference between the randomised treatment arms may however be due to a lack of power of this trial to detect small, yet clinically worthwhile, treatment benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Delbaldo
- Service de Cancérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France.
| | - D Serin
- Clinique St Catherine, Avignon, France
| | | | - S Greget
- Clinique St Clotilde, La Réunion, France
| | | | - F Priou
- Service Onco-Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche Sur Yon, France
| | | | - E Teissier
- Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France
| | - P Laplaige
- Polyclinique de Blois, La Chaussée St Victor, France
| | - L Zelek
- Service de Cancérologie, Hôpital Avicennes, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint Denis, France
| | - E Quinaux
- International Development Drug Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - M Buyse
- International Development Drug Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - P Piedbois
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chidlovskii E, Maillet M, Deschasse G, Mousseau M, Couturier P. Carcinome en cuirasse : une présentation rare d’un carcinome mammaire primitif. Rev Med Interne 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2013.03.201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
24
|
Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Ferrero JM, Thomas F, Bobin-Dubigeon C, Merlin JL, Pinguet F, Ferrand C, Boyer JC, Romieu G, Bachelot T, Pivot X, Dieras V, Largillier R, Mousseau M, Goncalves A, Roche HH, Bonneterre J, De Clercq B, Milano G. A French prospective pilot study for identifying dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in breast cancer patients (pts) receiving capecitabine (cap). J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e13519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e13519 Background: For fluoropyrimidines, and especially cap, Health Authorities point out that DPD deficiency confers a significant risk of major toxicity (tox). Identification of at-risk pts is thus relevant. This multicentric prospective study of the French GPCO group (Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique, Unicancer) evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of DPD phenotyping and genotyping for predicting severe cap-related tox in metastatic breast cancer pts. Methods: 303 pts were included (15 institutions), 88% received cap as monotherapy, 28% were treated as first line (mean dose at 1st cycle 1957 mg/m2/d). Pre-treatment dihydrouracil (UH2) and uracil (U) plasma concentrations were measured in 286 pts (HPLC assay). DPD genotyping (IVS14+1G>A, 2846A>T, 1679T>G, 464T>A) was done on 281 pts. Severe tox (G3-4 CTCAE v3 criteria) was measured over cycles 1-2. Results: Grade 3-4 tox (diarrhea, vomiting, hematoxicity, hand-foot syndrome) was observed in 19.6% of pts (one toxic death). A marked trend for higher U (median 12.7 vs 10.2 ng/ml, p=0.014) and UH2 (median 110 vs 93 ng/ml, p=0.011) concentrations was observed in pts developing severe tox vs those who didn’t. However, ROC curves showed that these differences were too small for use as reliable tox predictors. The distribution of UH2/U ratio was similar between pts with or without tox (median 9.1 vs 9.6, respectively, p=0.80). The patient with toxic death had a UH2/U ratio of 6.5 and U concentration of 17 ng/ml. Among the 7 pts with a DPD mutation (3 pts IVS14+1, 3 pts 2846A>T, one 1679T>G, all heterozygous), 5 developed severe tox (including toxic death, 2846A>T), one did not, and the last one was not documented. Relative risk for developing severe tox was 4.60 in mut pts vs wt pts (95%CI 2.95-7.16, p=0.001); positive and negative predictive values were 83.3% and 81.9%, respectively; specificity was 99.5% and sensitivity was 9.8%. Conclusions: These data point out that breast cancer pts harbouring a DPD variant allele are candidate to develop severe, up to lethal, cap-related tox. In contrast, pre-treatment UH2/U ratio and U measurements are not reliable predictors of cap tox. Clinical trial information: Eudract 2008-004136-20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gilles Romieu
- Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Val D'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department de Cancerologie Medicale, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Xavier Pivot
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tadj M, Arnoux V, Mousseau M, Descotes JL, Quesada JL, Bensaadi L, Laramas M. A moncentric review of targeted therapy on overall survival in metastatic renal clear cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e15593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e15593 Background: Anti-angiogenic treatment had radically modified therapeutic strategy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study is aimed to determine the overall survival (OS) improvement in clinical practice. Methods: Retrospective, monocentric and non-interventional study in mRCC diagnosed since 2000 with 2 cohorts of patients determined according to the first line treatment (targeted therapy or others treatment). Results: Between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2010, 98 patients were included. The 2 cohorts were balanced with regard to baseline disease and demographic characteristics in particular for prognosis profiles distribution. As first line, 58 patients received targeted therapy whose 21% were treated by bevacizumab, 71% by sunitinib and 8% by temsirolimus. In non-targeted therapy cohort (n=40), 37.5% were treated by cytokines, 15% by cytotoxic chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Patients treated with targeted therapy had a significantly longer median OS (30 months versus 13 months; p<.003, log-rank test). The Hazard Ratio (HR) of death at 3 years was 0.53 (95% Confidence Interval, 0.33-0.85; p=.008, log-rank test). When adjusted to the prognosis profile, the HR of death was 0.43 (95%CI, 0.27-0.71). Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated the improvement of OS due to targeted treatments, for all prognostic risk groups. This result supported the complete change of care of mRCC patients with extension of therapeutic indications and efficient therapeutic lines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Tadj
- Michallon University Hospital, Medical Oncology, Grenoble, France
| | - Valentin Arnoux
- Michallon University Hospital, Department of Urology, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Jean Luc Descotes
- Michallon University Hospital, Department of Urology, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Louis Quesada
- Michallon University Hospital, Clinical Research Center, Grenoble, France
| | - Lamia Bensaadi
- Michallon University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Grenoble, France
| | - Mathieu Laramas
- Michallon University Hospital, Medical Oncology, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ferrand F, Malka D, Bourredjem A, Allonier C, Bouché O, Louafi S, Boige V, Mousseau M, Raoul JL, Bedenne L, Leduc B, Deguiral P, Faron M, Pignon JP, Ducreux M. Impact of primary tumour resection on survival of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous metastases treated by chemotherapy: results from the multicenter, randomised trial Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 9601. Eur J Cancer 2012; 49:90-7. [PMID: 22926014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2012] [Revised: 07/19/2012] [Accepted: 07/20/2012] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of primary tumour resection on overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). DESIGN Among the 294 patients with non-resectable colorectal metastases enrolled in the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 phase III trial, which compared different first-line single-agent chemotherapy regimens, 216 patients (73%) presented with synchronous metastases at study entry and constituted the present study population. Potential baseline prognostic variables including prior primary tumour resection were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS curves were compared with the logrank test. RESULTS Among the 216 patients with stage IV CRC (median follow-up, 33 months), 156 patients (72%) had undergone resection of their primary tumour prior to study entry. The resection and non-resection groups did not differ for baseline characteristics except for primary tumour location (rectum, 14% versus 35%; p=0.0006). In multivariate analysis, resection of the primary was the strongest independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-0.8; p=0.0002) and OS (HR, 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.6; p<0.0001). Both median PFS (5.1 [4.6-5.6] versus 2.9 [2.2-4.1] months; p=0.001) and OS (16.3 [13.7-19.2] versus 9.6 [7.4-12.5]; p<0.0001) were significantly higher in the resection group. These differences in patient survival were maintained after exclusion of patients with rectal primary (n=43). CONCLUSION Resection of the primary tumour may be associated with longer PFS and OS in patients with stage IV CRC starting first-line, single-agent chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Ferrand
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Gastro-intestinal Unit, Department of Oncologic Medicine, Université Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schmitt A, Gladieff L, Laffont CM, Evrard A, Boyer JC, Lansiaux A, Bobin-Dubigeon C, Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Boisdron-Celle M, Mousseau M, Pinguet F, Floquet A, Billaud EM, Durdux C, Le Guellec C, Mazières J, Lafont T, Ollivier F, Concordet D, Chatelut E. Factors for hematopoietic toxicity of carboplatin: refining the targeting of carboplatin systemic exposure. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:4568-74. [PMID: 20855828 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.29.3597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Area under the curve (AUC) dosing is routinely carried out for carboplatin, but the chosen target AUC values remain largely empirical. This multicenter pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) study was performed to determine the covariates involved in the interindividual variability of carboplatin hematotoxicity that should be considered when choosing individual target AUCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred eighty-three patients received carboplatin as part of established regimens. A semi-physiologic population PK-PD model was applied to describe separately the time course of absolute neutrophil and platelet counts using NONMEM software. The plasma ultrafiltrable carboplatin concentration (C(Carbo)) was assumed to inhibit the proliferation of blood cell precursors through a linear model: drug effect = slope × C(Carbo). The slope corresponds to the patients' sensitivity to carboplatin hematotoxicity. The relationships between the patients' sensitivity to the neutropenic or thrombopenic effects of carboplatin and various covariates, including associated chemotherapies, demographic, biologic, and pharmacogenetic data, were studied. RESULTS The sensitivity of carboplatin-induced thrombocytopenia decreased in the case of concomitant paclitaxel chemotherapy (slope decreased by 24%), whereas it increased with coadministration of etoposide and gemcitabine (slope increased by 45% and 133%, respectively). For neutropenia, the sensitivity increased when carboplatin was combined with other cytotoxics (slope increased by 76%). CONCLUSION This study provides useful information to clinicians to better estimate the hematopoietic toxicity of carboplatin and thus choose more rationally carboplatin target AUCs as a function of pretreatment or concomitantly administered chemotherapies. For example, an AUC of 5 mg/mL · min is associated with a risk of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia of 2% in combination with paclitaxel versus 38% with gemcitabine in a non-pretreated patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonin Schmitt
- Institut Claudius-Regaud and EA3035 University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Messai R, Simonet M, Bricon-Souf N, Mousseau M. Characterizing consumer health terminology in the breast cancer field. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160:991-994. [PMID: 20841832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Despite the large availability of medical information on the Internet, health consumers still encounter problems to find, interpret and understand this information. These problems are mainly due to their lack in medical knowledge and the difference between their language and the language of health professionals. In order to propose information retrieval services more adapted to health consumers language and knowledge, we have developed techniques to collect, identify and analyze the terms and the expressions used by lay persons to talk about breast cancer. The study of health consumers' language is a relatively recent research field. Many studies have been conducted to analyze and characterize the vocabulary used by health consumers to talk about medical subjects in English. We have conducted the same study for the French language in the breast cancer field. We have gathered a corpus of texts to identify terms and expressions used by health consumers who talk about breast cancer in French. The terms have been organized in a concept-based terminology. This terminology has been analyzed on several levels: concept level, term level, term-concept level and finally relation level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radja Messai
- TIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mousseau M, Faure H, Hininger I, Bayet-Robert M, Favier A. Leukocyte 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine and comet assay in epirubicin-treated patients. Free Radic Res 2009; 39:837-43. [PMID: 16036363 DOI: 10.1080/10715760500042860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Epirubicin fights cancer through topoisomerase II inhibition, hence producing DNA strand breaks that finally lead to cell apoptosis. But anthracyclines produce free radicals that may explain their adverse effects. Dexrazoxane--an iron chelator--was proven to decrease free radical production and anthracycline cardiotoxicity. In this article, we report the concentrations of cellular 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dGuo) relative to 2'-deoxyguanosine (dGuo), and comet assay results from a study including 20 cancer patients treated with epirubicin. Plasma concentrations of vitamins A, E, C and carotenoids are also reported. All data were obtained before and immediately after epirubicin infusion. The ratios of 8-Oxo-dGuo to dGuo were measured in leukocyte DNA by HPLC-coulometry after NaI extraction of nucleic acids. Vitamins A and E and carotenoids were measured by HPLC-spectrophotometry. Vitamin C was measured by HPLC-spectrofluorimetry. Median 8-oxo-dGuo/dGuo ratios increased significantly from 0.34 to 0.48 lesions per 100,000 bases while per cent of tail DNA increased from 3.47 to 3.94 after chemotherapy 8-Oxo-dGuo/dGuo and per cent of tail DNA medians remained in the normal range. Only vitamin C decreased significantly from 55.4 to 50.3 microM Decreases in vitamins A, E, lutein and zeaxanthin were not significant, but concentrations were below the lower limit of the normal range both before and after chemotherapy. Only the correlation between comet assay results and vitamin C concentrations was significant (rho =-0.517, p = 0.023). This study shows that cellular DNA is damaged by epirubicin-generated free radicals which produce the mutagenic modified base 8-oxo-dGuo and are responsible for strand breaks. However, strand breaks are created not only by free radicals but also by topoisomerase II inhibition. In a previous study we did not find any significant change in urinary 8-oxo-dGuo excretion after adriamycin treatment. However, 8-oxo-dGuo may have increased at the end of urine collection as DNA repair and subsequent kidney elimination are relatively slow processes. In another study, authors used GC-MS to detect 8-oxo-dGuo in DNA and did not find any change after prolonged adriamycin infusion. Reasons for these apparent discrepancies are discussed.
Collapse
|
30
|
Gauchez AS, Colonna M, Brand FX, Ravanel N, Pasquier D, Payan R, Mousseau M. Kinetics of HER2/neu ECD in 45 patients treated with trastuzumab (Herceptin) between January 2001 and June 2005 at the Grenoble University Hospital. Anticancer Res 2009; 29:1703-1707. [PMID: 19443390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of HER2/neu ECD concentration as a marker of the efficacity of clinical response to Herceptin. PATIENTS AND METHODS Iterative measurements of HER2/neu ECD (ELISA c-erbB2/c-neu Rapid Format Elisa kit QIA10 Calbiochem) concentrations in 45 patients treated with Herceptin between January 2001 and June 2005 at the Grenoble University Hospital. RESULTS Changes in HER2/neu ECD concentrations were observed in 21 patients (47%). The baseline concentration was the concentration of circulating HER2/neu ECD before treatment with Herceptin. In 15 patients, the mean baseline concentration was 52 ng mL(-1) (extreme values 13-170), which normalized no later than at the time of the 3rd administration of Herceptin. Nine patients (60%) were still alive 5 years later (p<0.05). For 6 patients, the mean baseline concentration was 800 ng mL(-1) (extreme values 140-2000) which persisted and even increased during Herceptin therapy; fewer than 25% were alive 30 months later (p<0.05). In the case of the 24 patients whose HER2/neu ECD concentration remained <5 ng mL(-1), survival time was intermediate. CONCLUSION The study confirmed the utility of HER2/neu ECD in predicting therapeutic response. However, as in the case of other circulating tumor markers, it is only useful when there is a variation in concentration. This marker should now be evaluated in multi-center studies covering a large number of homogeneous subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Sophie Gauchez
- Biology Department, Grenoble University Hospital 38043 Grenoble cedex 9, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gauchez AS, Ravanel N, Villemain D, Brand FX, Pasquier D, Payan R, Mousseau M. Evaluation of a manual ELISA kit for determination of HER2/neu in serum of breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res 2008; 28:3067-3073. [PMID: 19031958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our aim was to conduct an analytical validation in a routine laboratory setting of the cerb-B2/c-neu ELISA assay kit from Calbiochem used to measure the extracellular domain (ECD) of HER2/neu in the serum of breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS The evaluation was based on three different production lots used in a routine laboratory setting. The reference value was based on a population of 217 patients with breast cancer not overexpressing HER2. RESULTS The detection limit, below that given by the manufacturer, was 0.34 ng ml(-1) and the quantification limit was 0.90 ng ml(-1). Reproducibility and repeatability were at least 95%, precision coefficients of variation varied between 6 and 8.5% and trueness measured by dilution tests and the standard additions method varied between 97 and 107%. The threshold was estimated at 5 ng ml(-1). CONCLUSION This technique presents satisfactory levels of accuracy for routine laboratory use.
Collapse
|
32
|
Ray-Coquard I, Guastalla JP, Allouache D, Combe M, Weber B, Cretin J, Curé H, Nunhuck S, Paraiso D, Mousseau M, Pujade-Lauraine E. HER2 Overexpression/Amplification and Trastuzumab Treatment in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A GINECO Phase II Study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.3816/coc.2008.n.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
33
|
Guihard N, Stefani L, Villard ML, Mousseau M. Dépistage du syndrome confusionnel en soins palliatifs : étude prospective à l’aide de l’échelle Nu-Desc (Nursing Delirium Screening Scale) au centre hospitalier universitaire de Grenoble. Médecine Palliative : Soins de Support - Accompagnement - Éthique 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medpal.2007.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
34
|
Berton-Rigaud D, Roché H, Penault-Llorca F, Tubiana-Mathieu N, Ferrero J, Coudert B, Milano GA, Mousseau M, Homokos H, Fumoleau P. Benefit of neoadjuvant capecitabine + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (CEX) versus 5-FU + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (FEC) for operable breast cancer (BC) followed by adjuvant docetaxel (T). J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
35
|
Gauchez AS, Pez E, Boutonnat J, Bourre JC, Pelletier L, Payan R, Mousseau M. [Early detection of leptomeningeal metastasis in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: validation of CA 15-3 measurement in cerebrospinal fluid]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2007; 65:653-658. [PMID: 18039611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2006] [Accepted: 08/27/2007] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Fifteen per cent of metastatic breast cancer will develop symptomatic leptomeningeal metastases. The introduction of trastuzumab (Herceptin) therapy has improved the response rates of survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2. Although previous studies are retrospective and of limited number, involving small study groups and different types of patient management, several authors have reported a 30% incidence of leptomeningeal metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2 who were treated with trastuzumab, while 70 to 80% of cases of the disease were controlled systemically. In order to improve control of the disease at the level of the central nervous system (CNS), routine detection of leptomeningeal metastases in high-risk patients could be offered. CA 15-3 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) detection might be useful in helping to diagnose CNS metastases, particularly where cytology results are negative--which applies to 30% of cases--because tumor markers are more sensitive in detecting the tumor process. Our study validate CA 15-3 measurement in CSF and reference values were given.
Collapse
|
36
|
Guastalla JP, Allouache D, Combe M, Weber B, Cretin J, Curé H, Mousseau M, Paraiso D, Camilleri-Broët S, Pujade-Lauraine E. HER2 overexpression and amplification in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC): Treatment with trastuzumab—A GINECO study. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.5559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5559 Background: Variable rates of HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification have been reported in AOC. Trastuzumab (Herceptin [H]) has been tested only as single agent and has shown a 7% response rate (RR) in heavily pre-treated AOC patients (pts) with 3+ and 2+ HER2 immunostaining (IHC) (Bookman MA et al, J Clin Oncol 2003). GINECO has explored the combination of H with paclitaxel (T) and carboplatin (C) in pts with resistant AOC (< 6 months) and HER2 gene amplification. Methods: 321 AOC pts were centrally screened for HER2 status (243 pts in first-line and 78 relapsing pts). All positive (3+) and doubtful (2+) cases were screened by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH). Pts with HER2 gene amplification, normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and resistant relapse after first or second line of chemotherapy including TC were treated with T (175mg/m2, 3h), C (AUC 5) and H (9mg/kg first course, 6mg/kg subsequent courses) every 3 weeks. Results: Of the 321 cases tested, 22 (6,7%) were HER2+ by IHC and FISH. Only 7 pts (32%) with a median age of 56 (range: 48–70) met the eligibility criteria of the trial. Pts had measurable lesions (n=4) or elevated CA 125 level + non-measurable lesions (n=3). Three pts had complete response (6, 7+ and 24+ months) and 2 had stable disease (3 months). Toxicity was moderate: febrile neutropenia, Gr3 infection, Gr2 neurotoxicity and decrease of LVEF after 23 cycles of H were observed in one patient respectively. Conclusions: HER2 overexpression/amplification is low in advanced ovarian carcinoma (6,7 %). In this small prospective cohort of resistant patients, 3 of 7 have achieved complete remission when adding Trastuzumab to conventional chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
|
37
|
Mousseau M, Serin D, Petit T, Priou F, Zelek L. Results of first-line weekly paclitaxel (P) + gemcitabine (G) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): An AERO phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.1103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1103 Background: Three weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine (PG) combination is recognised as an efficient treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Weekly paclitaxel has shown improved results comparatively with the three weekly administration. We conducted a study to evaluate a weekly schedule of PG combination in fist line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and methods: Patients with MBC were enrolled in this study to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of P 80mg/m2 D1, 8, 15 and G 1,250 mg/m2 D1, 8 (at fixed dose rate of 10mg/m2 /min) and cycles were repeated every 21 days. This phase II trial had a 2 stages design. Overall response rate was the primary end point. Results: In the first step of the trial 19 pts were enrolled with a median age of 59.5 (range 40 - 74). Baseline ECOG < 2 in 89% of pts. Main metastatic sites were: bone (36 %), lung (36%), liver (36%) and lymph nodes (32%). 52 % of pts had only one metastatic site. Previous treatments included surgery (89%), radiotherapy (73%), anthracycline based chemotherapy (74%) and adjuvant hormontherapy (52%). 18 pts were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. 6 achieved PR, 5 SD and 6 PD resulting in an ORR of 33%. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Main grade 3–4 toxicities per patient were neutropenia (67%), febrile neutropenia (5%), anemia (17%), thrombocytopenia (33%), trasnsaminases leveations (11%) and dyspnia (5%). Chemotherapy was delayed frequently for toxicity reasons (delays or arrest for toxicity in 15 pts). Conclusion: This weekly PG regimen has some activity in MBC. Although life-threatening toxicities were uncommon, delays in haematological recovery are frequent, making the investigated schedule unsuitable for further studies. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Mousseau
- Hopital Albert Michalon, Grenoble, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; CHD les Oudairies, La Roche Sur Yon, France; Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - D. Serin
- Hopital Albert Michalon, Grenoble, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; CHD les Oudairies, La Roche Sur Yon, France; Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - T. Petit
- Hopital Albert Michalon, Grenoble, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; CHD les Oudairies, La Roche Sur Yon, France; Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - F. Priou
- Hopital Albert Michalon, Grenoble, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; CHD les Oudairies, La Roche Sur Yon, France; Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - L. Zelek
- Hopital Albert Michalon, Grenoble, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; CHD les Oudairies, La Roche Sur Yon, France; Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Borget I, Aupérin A, Pignon JP, Abbas M, Bouché O, Mousseau M, Raoul JL, Bedenne L, Cassan P, Clavero-Fabri MC, Stremsdoerfer N, Nasca S, Queuniet AM, Ducreux M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line chemotherapies in metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 randomized trial. Oncology 2007; 71:40-8. [PMID: 17344670 DOI: 10.1159/000100448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2006] [Accepted: 01/13/2007] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The De Gramont regimen (or high-dose LV5FU2, HD-LV5FU2) is considered a standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the costs of three regimens as compared to HD-LV5FU2: raltitrexed (R), LV5FU2 with a lower dose of folinic acid (LD-LV5FU2), and weekly infusional 5FU (WI-FU). METHODS An economic analysis was performed prospectively as part of a randomized trial comparing first-line chemotherapy regimens in 294 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Direct medical costs were computed from the health system viewpoint using 2001 unit costs. RESULTS None of the three regimens improved EFS as compared to HD-LV5FU2. R was less effective and more toxic. The mean total cost per patient was euro 15,970 for HD-LV5FU2. The cost of R (10,687 euro) was lower than that of HD-LV5FU2 (p = 0.008). The cost of LD-LV5FU2 (14,888 euro) and of WI-FU (13,760 euro) was not significantly different from that of HD-LV5FU2. CONCLUSION The lower efficacy and increased toxicity of R made it a clinically inferior regimen despite its easy administration and lower cost. The HD-LV5FU2 protocol remains a better treatment. LD-LV5FU2 appeared a good alternative regimen because it reduced costs without jeopardizing its efficacy. The WI-FU regimen did not show a significant difference in terms of efficacy, but suggested toxicity to be slightly increased.
Collapse
|
39
|
Gauchez AS, Dreux S, Stéfani L, Mousseau M, Jouk PS, Muller F. Could ovarian choriocarcinoma be detected by maternal serum screening for Down syndrome? Prenat Diagn 2007; 27:682-4. [PMID: 17533625 DOI: 10.1002/pd.1769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of ovarian malignancies during gestation ranges from 1 in 8000 to 1 in 20,000 deliveries. Ovarian malignancies that produce human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) are limited to germ cell tumors, of which dysgerminoma is the most frequent (45%) malignant type encountered in pregnant patients, the others being ovarian choriocarcinoma and mixed germ cell tumors (Boulay and Podczaski, 1998). In women of childbearing age, it is hard to distinguish between metastatic choriocarcinoma on a complete mole and primary ovarian choriocarcinoma. Treatment is based on adnexectomy followed by chemotherapy. Given the extreme rarity of these tumors, the long-term prognosis is difficult to establish. Had the diagnosis for our patient been made during pregnancy, the therapeutic approach would have been discussed in terms of gestational age. In the last trimester, we could have suggested cesarean section followed by adnexectomy, and then chemotherapy. In the second-trimester, chemotherapy could have been discussed, although the fetal toxicity of cisplatin chemotherapy is not firmly defined (Ferrandina et al., 2005). This treatment is an alternative to termination of pregnancy. We retrospectively studied maternal serum biochemistry so as to assess the possibility of a diagnosis of ovarian choriocarcinoma at the time of maternal serum screening for Down syndrome.
Collapse
|
40
|
Delozier T, Guastalla JP, Yovine A, Levy C, Chollet P, Mousseau M, Delva R, Coeffic D, Vannetzel JM, Zazzi ES, Brienza S, Cvitkovic E. A phase II study of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine/5-fluorouracil combination in patients with anthracycline-pretreated and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2006; 17:1067-73. [PMID: 17001180 DOI: 10.1097/01.cad.0000231475.77159.aa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine/5-fluorouracil (FON) combination in anthracycline and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. The following treatment was given: on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m (2-h intravenous infusion); on days 1 and 5, vinorelbine [dose level (DL) 1: 17.5 mg/m; DL2: 22 mg/m]; on days 1-5, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (DL1: 600 mg/m/day; DL2: 750 mg/m/day). Forty-seven patients were treated (DL1: 43; DL2: 4). Median age was 54 years; 68% had liver metastases, 53% were taxane refractory/resistant and 38% were anthracycline refractory/resistant. Patients received a median of six treatment cycles. Of 46 eligible patients, 16 had partial response; the overall response rate was 34.8% (95% confidence interval 21.3-50.3%), 11 had stable disease lasting more than 4 months. Median follow-up was 13.0 months, median time to progression 5.7 months and estimated overall survival 18.8 months. DL2 was too toxic with three patients having grade 3-4 toxicity, including one death. At DL1, 26 patients (60%) experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia (six febrile neutropenia) and eight had grade 3 oxaliplatin-specific peripheral neuropathy after a median of 646.4 mg/m oxaliplatin (range 124-1619 mg/m). Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m, day 1)/vinorelbine (17.5 mg/m, days 1,5)/5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m/day, days 1-5) demonstrate encouraging activity and a manageable safety profile in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.
Collapse
|
41
|
Ducreux M, Bouche O, Pignon JP, Mousseau M, Raoul JL, Cassan P, Leduc B, Berger C, Dunant A, Fournet J, Bedenne L. Randomised Trial Comparing Three Different Schedules of Infusional 5FU and Raltitrexed Alone as First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Oncology 2006; 70:222-30. [PMID: 16816536 DOI: 10.1159/000094357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2005] [Accepted: 05/17/2006] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
LV5FU2 with high-dose leucovorin (LV), weekly infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (AIO schedule) and raltitrexed have been demonstrated to be active agents in first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. We performed a 4-arm randomised trial to compare (1) a low-dose intravenous bolus of LV (20 mg/m2), followed by an intravenous bolus of 5FU (400 mg/m2), followed by a 22-hour continuous infusion of 5FU (600 mg/m2) on day 1 and day 2/2 weeks (ldLV5FU2 arm), (2) a weekly continuous infusion of high-dose 5FU (2.6 g/m2/week) for 6 weeks followed by a rest week (HD-FU arm) and (3) raltitrexed (Tomudex arm; 3 mg/m2/3 weeks) to standard LV5FU2. From 1997 to 2001, 294 patients were included. The 4 arms were well balanced for sex ratio, age, WHO performance status, the primary tumour site and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment was stopped due to low accrual. Two toxicity-related deaths were observed in the Tomudex arm. The treatments gave rise to different rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (3, 4, 11 and 14% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively, p = 0.028), leucopenia and vomiting. At least one episode of grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 27, 25, 38 and 47% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.016). An objective response was observed in 28, 21, 22 and 10% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.04). Progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the Tomudex arm was statistically lower compared to that of patients treated with LV5FU2 or ldLV5FU2 (combined group; p = 0.013, log rank test). In conclusion, Tomudex is more toxic and yields shorter PFS than infusional 5FU. Despite the early closure of the study and the lack of power of the comparison, it seems that ldLV5FU2 could be considered as an active, easier and less expensive option for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer compared to classic LV5FU2 or weekly HD-FU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ducreux
- Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
|
43
|
Abstract
At the time of hospitalization, it is essential to evaluate the general health status of a patient and to follow up the trends during therapy. Our work is focused on a set of tools for the measurement of patient activity. In this paper, we propose a few indicators of the patient activities of daily living, such as mobility, agitation, repartitions of stays, and displacements. As a result of this work, a diagnostic system was developed that could lead to a deeper knowledge of human activity rhythms in normal situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gael LeBellego
- TIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rebischung C, Barnoud R, Stéfani L, Faucheron JL, Mousseau M. The effectiveness of trastuzumab (Herceptin) combined with chemotherapy for gastric carcinoma with overexpression of the c-erbB-2 protein. Gastric Cancer 2006; 8:249-52. [PMID: 16328600 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-005-0342-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2005] [Accepted: 06/22/2005] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The c-erbB-2 protein is overexpressed in 7% of gastric cancer cases, suggesting that anti-c-erbB-2 antibody therapy (trastuzumab; Herceptin) could be used. We report here a 28-year-old woman with metastatic gastric cancer overexpressing c-erbB-2 (3 + strong membrane staining on immunohistochemistry) who was treated with trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy. A complete response was obtained with a combination of trastuzumab and oxaliplatin and was maintained with trastuzumab alone for 18 months. The patient relapsed and chemotherapy (capecitabine, docetaxel) was combined with the anti-c-erbB-2 antibody. The patient survived for 4 years with metastatic disease controlled for 2 years by immunochemotherapy. We conclude that the combination of trastuzumab and chemotherapy is efficient in the treatment of metastatic gastric carcinoma with overexpression of the c-erbB-2 protein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Rebischung
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University Hospital, BP 217-38043 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
André T, Tournigand C, Achille E, Tubiana-Mathieu N, Lledo G, Raoul Y, Carola E, Flesch M, Muron T, Boutan-Laroze A, Guérin Meyer V, Boaziz C, Maigre M, Ganem G, Mousseau M, Mounedji-Boudiaf L, de Gramont A. [Adjuvant treatment of colon cancer MOSAIC study's main results]. Bull Cancer 2006; 93 Suppl 1:S5-9. [PMID: 16483940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (LV5FU) improves the response rate and survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The objective of the Mosaic study was to evaluate the efficacy of this association in the adjuvant treatment of stage II and III colon cancer. This international study, including 2,246 patients, compared the efficacy of standard treatment with LV5FU2 alone to that of oxaliplatin-LV5FU (Folfox4 regimen) following R0 resection of the primary tumour. Both treatments were administered every two weeks for six months. At 3-year follow-up, the risk of relapse was decreased by 23% in the Folfox4 group (p = 0.002). The protocol was well tolerated, with an identical overall mortality during treatment (0.5%) in both groups. The main specific complication, peripheral sensory neuropathy was reversible in the great majority of cases. A new analysis at 4-year follow-up (median 48.6 months) confirmed the superior efficacy of the Folfox4 regimen compared to the standard treatment, the reduction in relapse risk being 24% (p = 0.0008). On the strength of these results, oxaliplatin was granted a marketing authorization for the indication adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer. Based on the data currently available, physicians should consider adjuvant treatment for stage II patients, making each individual decision for treatment on a case-by-case basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry André
- Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75970 Paris Cedex 20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Brand FX, Ravanel N, Gauchez AS, Pasquier D, Payan R, Fagret D, Mousseau M. Prospect for anti-HER2 receptor therapy in breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2006; 26:463-70. [PMID: 16739306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
The carcinogenesis process is characterized, in part, by the dysfunction of cellular communication pathways, such as the one involving HER2. HER2 is a member of the EGF receptor family, which participates in cell growth and proliferation. HER2 may be overexpressed in 15 to 30% of breast cancer cases and is associated with poor prognosis, shortened overall survival and shorter time to disease progression. Furthermore, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated the relevance of HER2 serum concentrations (sHER2, extracellular domain released into blood by proteolysis) as a predictive marker of resistance to chemotherapy in HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. The determination of HER2 overexpression/ amplification in the diagnosis of relapse of breast cancer is currently a routine procedure. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, which are used to detect HER2 expression in the tumor, are improving constantly, and other parallel techniques such as chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) are starting to emerge. sHER2 concentrations can be measured using ELISA techniques, which can be automated. All of these procedures still need to be standardized. The discovery of a monoclonal antibody (4D5) that can inhibit the growth and proliferation of cells overexpressing HER2 led to the development of trastuzumab. Like 4D5, trastuzumab recognizes an epitope on the extracellular domain of HER2. Moreover, trastuzumab is also able to stimulate antibody-dependent cellular toxicity (ADCC). It is administered alone or in combination (with navelbine, taxol, carboplatin...) in patients with metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2. Other active antibodies have since been discovered, as well as other specific molecules, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors which will undoubtedly find a place in the therapeutic arsenal used in breast cancer, especially to avoid the emergence of resistance to treatment.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/therapy
- Humans
- Oligonucleotides, Antisense/genetics
- Oligonucleotides, Antisense/therapeutic use
- Prognosis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors
- Receptor, ErbB-2/biosynthesis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics
- Receptor, ErbB-2/immunology
- Trastuzumab
Collapse
|
47
|
Brand FX, Ravanel N, Gauchez AS, Pasquier D, Payan R, Fagret D, Mousseau M. Prospect for anti-her2 receptor therapy in breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2006; 26:715-22. [PMID: 16739343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
The carcinogenic process is characterized, in part, by the dysfunction of cellular communication pathways, such as the one involving HER2. HER2 is a member of the EGF receptor family, which participates in cell growth and proliferation. HER2 may be overexpressed in 15 to 30% of breast cancer cases and is associated with poor prognosis, shortened overall survival and shorter time to disease progression. Furthermore, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated the relevance of HER2 serum concentrations (sHER2, extracellular domain released into the blood by proteolysis) as a predictive marker of resistance to chemotherapy in HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. The determination of HER2 overexpression/ amplification in the diagnosis of relapse of breast cancer is currently a routine procedure. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, used to detect HER2 expression in the tumor, are improving constantly and other parallel techniques such as chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) are emerging. sHER2 concentrations can be measured using ELISA techniques, which can be automated. All of these procedures still need to be standardized. The discovery of a monoclonal antibody (4D5) that can inhibit the growth and proliferation of cells overexpressing HER2 led to the development of trastuzumab. Like 4D5, trastuzumab recognizes an epitope on the extracellular domain of HER2. Moreover, trastuzumab is also able to stimulate antibody-dependent cellular toxicity (ADCC). It is administered alone or in combination (with navelbine, taxol, carboplatin, etc.) in patients with metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2. Other active antibodies have since been discovered, as well as other specific molecules, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors which will undoubtedly find a place in the therapeutic arsenal used in breast cancer, especially to avoid resistance to treatment.
Collapse
|
48
|
De Oliveira F, Chauvin C, Ronot X, Mousseau M, Leverve X, Fontaine E. Effects of permeability transition inhibition and decrease in cytochrome c content on doxorubicin toxicity in K562 cells. Oncogene 2005; 25:2646-55. [PMID: 16331251 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
As mitochondria play a key role in the commitment to cell death, we have investigated the mitochondrial consequences of resistance to doxorubicin (DOX) in K562 cells. We found that the permeability transition pore (PTP) inhibitor cyclosporine A (CsA) failed to inhibit PTP opening in the resistant clone. Moreover, the Ca2+ loading capacity in the resistant clone was identical to that observed in the parent cells in the presence of CsA, suggesting that the PTP was already inhibited in a CsA-like manner in the resistant cells. In agreement with this proposal, the mitochondrial target of CsA cyclophilin D (CyD) decreased by half in the resistant cells. The levels of adenine nucleotide translocator, voltage anion-dependent channel, Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, AIF and Smac/Diablo, were similar in both cell lines, whereas cytochrome c content was divided by three in the resistant cells. Since P-glycoprotein inhibition did not restore DOX toxicity in the resistant cells, while DOX-induced cell death in the parent cells was prevented by either PTP inhibition or siRNA-induced decrease in cytochrome c content, we conclude that the inhibition of PTP opening and the decrease in cytochrome c content participate in the mechanism that makes K562 cells resistant to DOX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F De Oliveira
- INSERM E-0221 Bioénergétique Fondamentale et Appliquée, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Alcouffe C, Boutonnat J, Clément-Lacroix J, Mousseau M, Ronot X. Non-toxic and short treatment with gemcitabine inhibits in vitro migration of HT-1080 cells. Anticancer Drugs 2004; 15:803-7. [PMID: 15494643 DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200409000-00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Gemcitabine has demonstrated clinical activity in solid tumors. Several in vitro studies were carried out regarding its metabolism, toxicity and cell cycle effects, but none was done on the anti-metastasis potential of the drug. We sought to determine the effect of gemcitabine concentrations on migration velocity of HT-1080 cells at concentrations which do not alter cell cycle progression and proliferation. Cells were treated for 1 or 5 h at IC10-70 of gemcitabine in order to estimate its effects on viability, proliferation and migration capacity using flow cytometry and microscopy imaging, respectively. The gemcitabine treatment for 1 h had no effect on cell proliferation, viability, cycle or migration on HT-1080 cells. Even though the 5 h of exposure at IC10, IC20 and IC50 concentrations did not affect cell viability, proliferation and cell cycle repartition, the mean velocity of HT-1080 dramatically decreased by 50 and 30%, respectively. Gemcitabine at IC70 concentrations for 5 h of exposure first induced a time course inhibition of proliferation, together with a decrease in viability and altered cell morphology, and then inhibited cell migration by 50%. These data suggest the possibility to couple the anti-migratory property of gemcitabine with the known anti-tumoral effect in the treatment of tumors with high metastatic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinne Alcouffe
- Laboratoire de Dynamique Cellulaire, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Eymard JC, Joly F, Priou F, Zannetti A, Ravaud A, Kerbrat P, Mousseau M, Paule B, Touze F, Ecstein-Fraisse E. Phase II randomized trial of docetaxel plus estramustine (DE) versus docetaxel (D) in patients (pts) with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC): a final report. J Clin Oncol 2004. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.4603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J.-C. Eymard
- Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Jean François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche/Yon, France; Clinique du Parc, Cholet, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; CHU Michallon, Grenoble, France; Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Laboratoire Aventis, Paris, France
| | - F. Joly
- Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Jean François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche/Yon, France; Clinique du Parc, Cholet, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; CHU Michallon, Grenoble, France; Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Laboratoire Aventis, Paris, France
| | - F. Priou
- Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Jean François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche/Yon, France; Clinique du Parc, Cholet, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; CHU Michallon, Grenoble, France; Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Laboratoire Aventis, Paris, France
| | - A. Zannetti
- Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Jean François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche/Yon, France; Clinique du Parc, Cholet, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; CHU Michallon, Grenoble, France; Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Laboratoire Aventis, Paris, France
| | - A. Ravaud
- Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Jean François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche/Yon, France; Clinique du Parc, Cholet, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; CHU Michallon, Grenoble, France; Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Laboratoire Aventis, Paris, France
| | - P. Kerbrat
- Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Jean François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche/Yon, France; Clinique du Parc, Cholet, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; CHU Michallon, Grenoble, France; Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Laboratoire Aventis, Paris, France
| | - M. Mousseau
- Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Jean François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche/Yon, France; Clinique du Parc, Cholet, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; CHU Michallon, Grenoble, France; Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Laboratoire Aventis, Paris, France
| | - B. Paule
- Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Jean François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche/Yon, France; Clinique du Parc, Cholet, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; CHU Michallon, Grenoble, France; Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Laboratoire Aventis, Paris, France
| | - F. Touze
- Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Jean François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche/Yon, France; Clinique du Parc, Cholet, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; CHU Michallon, Grenoble, France; Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Laboratoire Aventis, Paris, France
| | - E. Ecstein-Fraisse
- Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Jean François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier Départemental, La Roche/Yon, France; Clinique du Parc, Cholet, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France; CHU Michallon, Grenoble, France; Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Laboratoire Aventis, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|