1
|
Epaillard N, Lusque A, Jacot W, Mailliez A, Bachelot T, Arnedos M, Le Du F, Brain E, Ferrero JM, Massard V, Desmoulins I, Mouret-Reynier MA, Levy C, Gonçalves A, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Filleron T, Bosquet L, Pistilli B, Frenel JS. Incidence and outcome of brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer in the French ESME cohort. ESMO Open 2024; 9:103447. [PMID: 38703431 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cancer that metastasizes to the brain. Particularly up to half of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) may develop brain metastases over the course of the disease. Nevertheless, little is known about the prevalence and the outcome of brain and leptomeningeal metastases (BLMM) in HER2-low BC. We compared the cumulative incidence of BLMM and associated outcomes among patients with HER2-low, HER2-negative (HER2-) and HER2+ mBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This cohort study was conducted from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) mBC database and included patients treated for mBC between 2012 and 2020 across 18 French comprehensive cancer centers and with known HER2 and hormone receptor (HR) status. The cumulative incidence of BLMM after metastatic diagnosis was estimated using a competing risk methodology with death defined as a competing event. RESULTS 19 585 patients were included with 6118 (31.2%), 9943 (50.8%) and 3524 (18.0%) being HER2-low, HER2- and HER2+ mBC, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.7-49.3 months], BLMM were reported in 4727 patients: 1192 (25.2%) were diagnosed with BLMM at first metastatic diagnosis and 3535 (74.8%) after metastatic diagnosis. Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, histological grade, metastases-free interval and HR status showed that the risk of BLMM at metastatic diagnosis was similar in patients with HER2- compared to HER2-low mBC [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 1.00 (0.86-1.17)] and higher in those with HER2+ compared to HER2-low [OR (95% CI) 2.23 (1.87-2.66)]. Similar results were found after metastatic diagnosis; the risk of BLMM was similar in HER2- compared to HER2-low [subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) (95% CI) 1.07 (0.98-1.16)] and higher in the HER2+ group [sHR (95% CI) 1.56 (1.41-1.73)]. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence and evolution of BLMM in HER2-low mBC are similar to those in patients with HER2- tumors. In contrast to patients with HER2+ mBC, the prognosis of BLMM remains dismal in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Epaillard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.
| | - A Lusque
- Biostatistics & Health Data Science Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse
| | - W Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer, Montpellier
| | - A Mailliez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon
| | - M Arnedos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - F Le Du
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes
| | - E Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud
| | - J M Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice
| | - V Massard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy
| | - I Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon
| | | | - C Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen
| | - A Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmette, Marseille
| | - M Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen
| | - T Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss ICANS, Strasbourg
| | - T Filleron
- Biostatistics & Health Data Science Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse
| | - L Bosquet
- Health Data and Partnership Department, Unicancer, Paris
| | - B Pistilli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; INSERM U1279, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - J S Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de L'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Drouyer A, Beaussire L, Jorda P, Leheurteur M, Guillemet C, Berghian A, Georgescu D, Di Fiore F, Perdrix A, Clatot F. Clinical relevance of circulating ESR1 mutations during endocrine therapy for advanced hormone-dependent endometrial carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1061. [PMID: 37924026 PMCID: PMC10625264 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11559-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endocrine therapy is frequently administered in patients with hormone dependent (HR+) metastatic endometrial cancer. ESR1 mutations have emerged as a key mechanism of aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance in HR + metastatic breast cancer and can be monitored using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The aim of this study was to explore the incidence and clinical relevance of circulating ESR1 mutations in patients treated by AI or megestrol acetate (M) for advanced endometrial carcinoma. METHODOLOGY This single-center retrospective study was performed at the Henri Becquerel Center (Rouen) and looked for circulating ESR1 gene mutations by droplet digital PCR (E380Q, L536R, Y537S, Y537N, Y537C, D538G, S463P) in patients with advanced HR + endometrial carcinoma treated between 2008 and 2020 for at least 30 days by AI or M. Analyses were performed before exposure and at progression/during endocrine therapy. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were included: 13 were treated with AI, 12 of whom progressed; 9 patients were treated with M, 8 of whom progressed. 68.1% of the patients had low-grade endometrial carcinoma and 54.5% had received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The median duration of treatment was 152 days (min 47 - max 629) with AI and 155 days (min 91-max 1297) with M. Under AI, there was no ESR1 mutation at baseline, and one Y537C mutation at progression with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 0.14%. Under M, one patient had a Y537C (VAF 0.2%) at baseline that disappeared during treatment. Another patient had a Y537S mutation emergence at progression after 91 days of treatment (VAF 1.83%). There was no significant difference between the circulating DNA concentration before and after hormone therapy (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION ESR1 mutations do not seem to be involved in the mechanisms of resistance to AI or M in HR+ endometrial cancer. The clinical relevance of their detection is not demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Drouyer
- Department of Gynecology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France.
| | - Ludivine Beaussire
- Rouen Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1245, IRON group, Rouen, France
| | - Pauline Jorda
- Department of Gynecology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France
| | - Cécile Guillemet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France
| | - Anca Berghian
- Department of Pathology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France
| | - Dragos Georgescu
- Department of Surgery, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France
| | - Frédéric Di Fiore
- Rouen Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1245, IRON group, Rouen, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France
| | - Anne Perdrix
- Rouen Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1245, IRON group, Rouen, France
- Department of Biopathology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France
| | - Florian Clatot
- Rouen Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1245, IRON group, Rouen, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cherifi F, Gernier F, Jardin F, Lefevre-Arbogast S, Bastien E, Lequesne J, Rigal O, Quilan F, Clarisse B, Grellard JM, Binarelli G, Fernette M, Lange M, Richard D, Morel A, Griffon B, Pepin LF, Leconte A, Faveyrial A, Leheurteur M, Beauplet B, Joly F. Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and quality of life among older patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101634. [PMID: 37757587 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and its associated health restrictions have harmed the population psychologically. We aimed to compare the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and Quality of Life (QoL) in older French patients with cancer to the younger ones. MATERIALS AND METHODS This longitudinal multicenter study named COVIPACT began in April 2020 during the first French lockdown and has included 579 outpatients receiving treatment for a solid or hematological malignancy. Data were collected every three months, namely at the first release period (M3), at the second lockdown (M6), at the second release period (M9), and finally at the last curfew period (M12) in France. Standardized validated self-questionnaires were used to assess PTSD symptoms (using the Event Scale-Revised self-questionnaire), insomnia (through the Insomnia Severity Index questionnaire), QoL (using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General questionnaire), and cognitive complaints (through the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognition questionnaire). Student (or Wilcoxon) tests and Chi-squared tests were used for continuous or discrete variables, respectively. We conducted linear mixed model to study the change during follow-up. RESULTS Out of 579 included patients, 157 (27%) were ≥ 70 years old at baseline, of whom 104 participated in the longitudinal study. At baseline, older patients reported fewer PTSD symptoms (17% versus 23%, p = .06), insomnia (17% versus 27%, p = .02), and cognitive complaint (3% versus 16%, p < .01) than younger patients. QoL at baseline was similar between age subgroups. We observed no significant difference in the trajectory of PTSD symptoms, insomnia, or emotional well-being between both groups during the follow-up. Cognitive complaints were lower at baseline in older patients but steadily increased during the follow-up and reached the same level as younger patients at one year. DISCUSSION One in five older patients reported PTSD symptoms, evolving similarly to younger patients during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. While cognitive complaints tend to recover in a bell-shaped curve at one year in younger patients, the trend is increasing in older ones. Screening for PTSD symptoms and late cognitive impairment should be given special attention in older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04366154.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francois Cherifi
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14076, France; Normandie University, UniCaen, INSERM U1086 "ANTICIPE" (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), Caen 14076, France
| | - François Gernier
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France; Normandie University, UniCaen, INSERM U1086 "ANTICIPE" (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), Caen 14076, France.
| | - Fabrice Jardin
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, UNICANCER, Rouen 76038, France; Hematology Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, UNICANCER, Rouen 76038, France
| | - Sophie Lefevre-Arbogast
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France; Normandie University, UniCaen, INSERM U1086 "ANTICIPE" (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), Caen 14076, France
| | - Etienne Bastien
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France
| | - Justine Lequesne
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France; Normandie University, UniCaen, INSERM U1086 "ANTICIPE" (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), Caen 14076, France
| | - Olivier Rigal
- Hematology Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, UNICANCER, Rouen 76038, France; Medical Oncology Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, UNICANCER, Rouen 76308, France
| | - Florian Quilan
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14076, France
| | - Bénédicte Clarisse
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France
| | - Jean-Michel Grellard
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France
| | - Giulia Binarelli
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France; Normandie University, UniCaen, INSERM U1086 "ANTICIPE" (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), Caen 14076, France
| | - Marie Fernette
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France
| | - Marie Lange
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France; Normandie University, UniCaen, INSERM U1086 "ANTICIPE" (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), Caen 14076, France
| | - Doriane Richard
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, UNICANCER, Rouen 76038, France
| | - Adeline Morel
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14076, France
| | - Bénédicte Griffon
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France
| | - Louis-Ferdinand Pepin
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, UNICANCER, Rouen 76038, France
| | - Alexandra Leconte
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France
| | - Audrey Faveyrial
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14076, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, UNICANCER, Rouen 76308, France
| | - Bérengère Beauplet
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM U1086, ANTICIPE, Caen F-14000, France; Normandy Interregional Oncogeriatric Coordination Unit, Caen 14000, France
| | - Florence Joly
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14076, France; Clinical Research Department, Centre Francois Baclesse, UNICANCER, Caen 14 076, France; Normandie University, UniCaen, INSERM U1086 "ANTICIPE" (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), Caen 14076, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferron G, De Rauglaudre G, Becourt S, Delanoy N, Joly F, Lortholary A, You B, Bouchaert P, Malaurie E, Gouy S, Kaminsky MC, Meunier J, Alexandre J, Berton D, Dohollou N, Dubot C, Floquet A, Favier L, Venat-Bouvet L, Fabbro M, Louvet C, Lotz JP, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Desauw C, Del Piano F, Leheurteur M, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Rastkhah M, Follana P, Gantzer J, Ray-Coquard I, Pujade-Lauraine E. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without nintedanib for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Lessons from the GINECO double-blind randomized phase II CHIVA trial. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:186-194. [PMID: 36706645 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
AIM The oral anti-angiogenic therapy nintedanib prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) when combined with chemotherapy after primary surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The randomized phase II CHIVA trial evaluated the impact of combining nintedanib with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed unresectable FIGO stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer received 3-4 cycles of carboplatin plus paclitaxel every 3 weeks as NACT before interval debulking surgery (IDS), followed by 2-3 post-operative cycles. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either nintedanib 200 mg twice daily or placebo on days 2-21 every 3 weeks during NACT (omitting peri-operative cycles), and then as maintenance therapy for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was PFS. RESULTS Between January 2013 and May 2015, 188 patients were randomized (124 to nintedanib, 64 to placebo). PFS was significantly inferior with nintedanib (median 14.4 versus 16.8 months with placebo; hazard ratio 1.50, p = 0.02). Overall survival (OS) was also inferior (median 37.7 versus 44.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio 1.54, p = 0.054). Nintedanib was associated with increased toxicity (grade 3/4 adverse events: 92% versus 69%, predominantly hematologic and gastrointestinal), lower response rate by RECIST (35% versus 56% before IDS), and lower IDS feasibility (58% versus 77%) versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS Adding nintedanib to chemotherapy and in maintenance as part of NACT for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer cannot be recommended as it increases toxicity and compromises chemotherapy efficacy (IDS, PFS, OS). CLINICALTRIALS govregistration: NCT01583322.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwénaël Ferron
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
| | | | | | - Nicolas Delanoy
- Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), APHP. Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
| | - Florence Joly
- Centre François Baclesse, Oncologie Médicale, Unicaen, Caen, France.
| | - Alain Lortholary
- Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France.
| | - Benoît You
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, EA3738 Centre pour l'Innovation en Cancérologie de LYon (CICLY), Lyon, France; GINECO-GINEGEPS, Paris, France.
| | - Patrick Bouchaert
- Hôpital de la Milétrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Pôle Régional de Cancérologie, Service d'Oncologie, Poitiers, France.
| | - Emmanuelle Malaurie
- Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Oncologie Radiothérapie, Créteil, France.
| | - Sebastien Gouy
- Gustave Roussy, Gynécologie Médicale, Villejuif, France.
| | | | - Jérôme Meunier
- Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, Service Oncologie Médicale, Orléans, France.
| | - Jérôme Alexandre
- Université de Paris Cité, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin Port Royal, Paris, France.
| | - Dominique Berton
- ICO Centre René Gauducheau, Boulevard Jacques Monod, Saint Herblain, France.
| | - Nadine Dohollou
- Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord, Oncologie Radiothérapie, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Coraline Dubot
- Hôpital René Huguenin, Institut Curie, Oncologie Médicale, Saint Cloud, France.
| | | | - Laure Favier
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, Oncologie Médicale, Dijon, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Christophe Desauw
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille - Hôpital Huriez, Lille, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Justine Gantzer
- ICANS, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg-Europe, Strasbourg, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mailliez A, D'Hondt V, Lusque A, Caron O, Cabel L, Goncalves A, Debled M, Gladieff L, Ferrero JM, Petit T, Mouret-Reynier MA, Eymard JC, Levy C, Uwer L, Leheurteur M, Desmoulins I, Bachelot T, Frenel JS, de la Motte Rouge T, Simon G, Jacot W, Delaloge S. Survival outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients by germline BRCA1/2 status in a large multicenter real-world database. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:921-931. [PMID: 36161271 PMCID: PMC10092337 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The outcomes and best treatment strategies for germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) carriers with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remain uncertain. We compared the overall survival and the first line progression free survival (PFS1) of patients with a gBRCAm identified at initiation of first-line treatment with those of BRCA wild-type (WT) and not-tested (NT) individuals in the ESME real-world database of MBC patients between 2008 and 2016 (NCT03275311). Among the 20 624 eligible patients, 325 had a gBRCAm, 1138 were WT and 19 161 NT. Compared with WT, gBRCAm carriers were younger, and had more aggressive diseases. At a median follow-up of 50.5 months, median OS was 30.6 (95%CI: 21.9-34.3), 35.8 (95%CI: 32.2-37.8) and 39.3 months (95% CI: 38.3-40.3) in the gBRCAm, WT and NT subgroups, respectively. Median PFS1 was 7.9 (95%CI: 6.6-9.3), 7.8 (95%CI: 7.3-8.5) and 9.7 months (95%CI, 9.5-10.0). In the multivariable analysis conducted in the whole cohort, gBRCAm status had however no independent prognostic impact on OS and PFS1. Though, in the triple-negative subgroup, gBRCAm patients had better OS and PFS1 (HR vs WT = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.60-0.97; P = .027 and 0.69; 95% CI: 0.55-0.86; P = .001, respectively). In contrast, in patients with HR+/HER2 negative cancers, PFS1 appeared significantly and OS non significantly lower for gBRCAm carriers (PFS1: HR vs WT = 1.23; 95%CI: 1.03-1.46; P = .024; OS:HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.97-1.52, P = .089). In conclusion, gBRCA1/2 status appears to have divergent survival effects in MBC according to IHC subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Veronique D'Hondt
- Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Amelie Lusque
- Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Luc Cabel
- Institut Curie, Paris et Saint Cloud, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lionel Uwer
- Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - William Jacot
- Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier/Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bastien E, Lefèvre-Arbogast S, Lequesne J, Gernier F, Cherifi F, Rigal O, Guittet L, Grellard JM, Binarelli G, Lange M, Fernette M, Tron L, Morel A, Richard D, Griffon B, Leconte A, Quilan F, Pépin LF, Jardin F, Leheurteur M, Faveyrial A, Clarisse B, Joly F. Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A One-Year Longitudinal Study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:265-272.e7. [PMID: 36812938 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer may be particularly vulnerable to psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. We studied the prevalence and evolution of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in patients with cancer during the pandemic waves, and we investigated factors associated with high symptoms. METHODS COVIPACT is a 1-year longitudinal prospective study of French patients with solid/hematologic malignancies receiving treatment during the first nationwide lockdown. PTSS were measured every 3 months from April 2020 using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Patients also completed questionnaires on their quality of life, cognitive complaints, insomnia, and COVID-19 lockdown experience. RESULTS Longitudinal analyses involved 386 patients with at least one PTSS assessment after baseline (median age, 63 years; 76% female). Among them, 21.5% had moderate/severe PTSS during the first lockdown. The rate of patients reporting PTSS decreased at lockdown release (13.6%), increased again at second lockdown (23.2%), and slightly declined from the second release period (22.7%) to the third lockdown (17.5%). Patients were grouped into 3 trajectories of evolution. Most patients had stable low symptoms throughout the period, 6% had high baseline symptoms slowly decreasing over time, and 17.6% had moderate symptoms worsening during the second lockdown. Female sex, feeling socially isolated, worrying about COVID-19 infection, and using psychotropic drugs were associated with PTSS. PTSS were associated with impaired quality of life, sleep, and cognition. CONCLUSIONS Approximately one-fourth of patients with cancer experienced high and persistent PTSS over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and may benefit from psychological support. CLINICALTRIALS gov identifier: NCT04366154.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Bastien
- Medical Oncology Department, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Sophie Lefèvre-Arbogast
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France
- Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
- National Clinical Research Platform for Quality of Life in Oncology, Besançon, France
| | | | - François Gernier
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France
- Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - François Cherifi
- Medical Oncology Department, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Olivier Rigal
- Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France
- Clinical Research, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France
| | - Lydia Guittet
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France
| | | | - Giulia Binarelli
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France
- Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Marie Lange
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France
- Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Marie Fernette
- Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Laure Tron
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France
| | - Adeline Morel
- Medical Oncology Department, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | | | | | | | - Florian Quilan
- Medical Oncology Department, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | | | - Fabrice Jardin
- Clinical Research, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France
- Hematology, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France
| | | | - Audrey Faveyrial
- Medical Oncology Department, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | | | - Florence Joly
- Medical Oncology Department, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France
- Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vasseur A, Carton M, Guiu S, Augereau P, Uwer L, Mouret-Reynier MA, Levy C, Eymard JC, Ferrero JM, Leheurteur M, Goncalves A, Robert M, De La Motte Rouge T, Bachelot T, Petit T, Debled M, Grinda T, Desmoulins I, Vanlemmens L, Nicolaï V, Simon G, Cabel L. Efficacy of taxanes rechallenge in first-line treatment of early metastatic relapse of patients with HER2-negative breast cancer previously treated with a (neo)adjuvant taxanes regimen: A multicentre retrospective observational study. Breast 2022; 65:136-144. [PMID: 35944353 PMCID: PMC9379666 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Taxanes are one of the most effective chemotherapies (CT) in breast cancer (BC), but the efficacy of taxanes rechallenge in early metastatic relapse has been poorly studied in patients previously treated by taxanes in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Our study aimed to analyse the efficacy of taxane rechallenge in case of early metastatic relapse in a multicentre retrospective observational study compared with other chemotherapies. Methods We analysed the French national ESME metastatic BC (MBC) database and selected HER2- MBC patients who received CT in first-line treatment for a metastatic relapse occurring 3–24 months after previous (neo)adjuvant taxanes treatment. Results Of 23,501 female patients with MBC in ESME, 1057 met the selection criteria. 58.4% received a taxane-based regimen (75.4% concomitant bevacizumab) and 41.6% received other CT. In hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- MBC, multivariate analysis showed no difference in OS between taxanes without bevacizumab compared to other CT (HZR = 1.3 [0.97; 1.74], but taxanes was significantly associated with worse PFS (HZR = 1.48 [1.14; 1.93]). In TNBC, taxanes without bevacizumab and carboplatin/gemcitabine were not superior to other CT for OS (HZR = 1.07 [0.79; 1.44] and HZR = 0.81 [0.58; 1.13], respectively), while for PFS, taxanes was inferior (HZR = 1.33 [1.06–1.67]) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine was superior to other CT (HZR = 0.63 [0.46; 0.87]). For both subtypes, the worse outcome observed with paclitaxel was no longer observed with the addition of bevacizumab. Conclusions With the limitation of retrospective design, taxanes rechallenge in early metastatic relapse of BC may result in a worse PFS in TNBC and HR+/HER2- MBC, which was not observed with the addition of bevacizumab. Patients with HER2-advanced breast cancer (ABC) have often previously received taxanes in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Current guidelines suggest a rechallenge by taxanes in ABC with DFI≥12 months, few data are available for DFI ≤24 months. Taxane rechallenge in early metastatic relapse of BC (DFI ≤24 months) may result in a worse PFS in TNBC and HR+/HER2- ABC. In TNBC, the addition of bevacizumab to taxanes improves PFS and OS for DFI ≤24 months.
Collapse
|
8
|
Yahi F, Lequesne J, Rigal O, Morel A, Leheurteur M, Grellard JM, Leconte A, Clarisse B, Joly F, Lefèvre-Arbogast S. Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and associated factors in breast cancer patients during the first COVID-19 lockdown in France. Front Psychol 2022; 13:768043. [PMID: 36186387 PMCID: PMC9521190 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.768043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We aimed to study post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in breast cancer (BC) patients during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Materials and methods We included BC patients receiving medical treatment during the first COVID-19 lockdown in France. PTSD symptoms were evaluated using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) questionnaire. Quality of life [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)], cognitive complaints [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)], insomnia [Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)], and psychosocial experiences during lockdown were also evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinical factors (from medical records) and psychosocial factors (from questionnaires) associated with PTSD symptoms. Results Among the 253 included BC patients (mean age: 58), 46% had metastatic cancer and 52% were treated by chemotherapy alone. COVID-19-induced adjustments in medical oncology practices were experienced by 27% of patients (mainly teleconsultations). No case of COVID-19 was reported; 23% of BC patients had PTSD symptoms. Compared to other patients, patients with PTSD symptoms had more fears relative to COVID-19 infection (83 vs. 60%, p = 0.009), had more feeling of isolation (69 vs. 41%, p = 0.003), and had more prescription or increased use of psychotropic drugs (49 vs. 20%, p = 0.001). In the multivariable model adjusted for clinical factors, fears relative to COVID-19 and increased use of psychotropic drugs were independently associated with PTSD symptoms (OR [95% CI] = 3.01 [1.20–8.44] and 3.45 [1.48–8.17], respectively). Besides, patients with PTSD symptoms had poor quality of life (QoL), and more cognitive complaints and insomnia. Conclusion Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms were observed in 23% of BC patients during the first COVID-19 lockdown in France. Psychological supports are needed for patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feriel Yahi
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- Department of Health, University of Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Justine Lequesne
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- *Correspondence: Justine Lequesne,
| | - Olivier Rigal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Adeline Morel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Alexandra Leconte
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Florence Joly
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- Department of Health, University of Caen Normandie, Caen, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- INSERM U1086 ANTICIPE, Caen, France
| | - Sophie Lefèvre-Arbogast
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- INSERM U1086 ANTICIPE, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Calbiac O, Lusque A, Mailliez A, Bachelot T, Uwer L, Mouret-Reynier MA, Emile G, Jouannaud C, Gonçalves A, Patsouris A, Diéras V, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Cottu P, Ferrero JM, D'Hondt V, Desmoulins I, Mourato-Ribeiro J, Martin AL, Frenel JS. Comparison of Management and Outcomes in ERBB2-Low vs ERBB2-Zero Metastatic Breast Cancer in France. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2231170. [PMID: 36107428 PMCID: PMC9478776 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE ERBB2-low (ie, ERBB2 immunohistochemistry score of 1+ or 2+ in the absence of ERBB2 gene amplification) breast cancer (BC) is a new entity, with emerging dedicated treatments. Little is known about its prognosis and response to conventional therapy compared with ERBB2-zero breast tumors (ie, those with an immunohistochemistry score of 0). OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes for patients with ERBB2-low metastatic BC (MBC) with those of patients with ERBB2-zero MBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study was conducted from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics MBC platform and included patients with MBC treated between 2008 and 2016 in 18 French comprehensive cancer centers. The data analysis was conducted from July 16, 2020, to April 1, 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was progression-free survival under first-line treatments (PFS1). RESULTS The median (range) age was 60.0 (22.0-103.0) years. Among 15 054 patients with MBC, 4671 (31%) had ERBB2-low MBC and 10 383 (69%) had ERBB2-zero MBC. The proportion of ERBB2-low cancers was higher among patients with hormone receptor-positive MBC than those with hormone receptor-negative disease (4083 patients [33.0%] vs 588 patients [21.0%]). With a median follow-up of 49.5 months (95% CI, 48.6-50.4 months), the median OS of the ERBB2-low group was 38.0 months (95% CI, 36.4-40.5 months) compared with 33.9 months (95% CI, 32.9-34.9 months) for the ERBB2-zero group (P < .001). After adjustment for age, visceral metastases, number of metastatic sites, de novo disease, period of care, and hormone receptor status, patients with ERBB2-low MBC had slightly better OS compared with patients with ERBB2-zero MBC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99; P = .02). In contrast, PFS1 did not differ by ERBB2 status (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95-1.02; P = .45). No significant differences in OS and PFS1 were observed in multivariate analyses by hormone receptor status and types of frontline treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this large cohort study, patients with ERBB2-low MBC had a slightly better OS than those with completely ERBB2-zero tumors, but identical PFS1, which could help guide treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ombline de Calbiac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes and Angers, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Amélie Lusque
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Claudius Regaud–IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Audrey Mailliez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - George Emile
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Christelle Jouannaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes and Angers, Angers, France
| | - Véronique Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | | | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris and Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Véronique D'Hondt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Jean-Sébastien Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes and Angers, Saint-Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Montrognon F, Clatot F, Berghian A, Douvrin F, Quieffin F, Defta D, Buquet A, Ferret M, Lequesne J, Leheurteur M, Fontanilles M, Georgescu D, Callonnec F. Impact of preoperative staging with contrast-enhanced mammography for localized breast cancer management. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210765. [PMID: 35195454 PMCID: PMC10996426 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A precise evaluation of the disease extent is mandatory before surgery for early breast cancer (EBC). Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEDM) is a recent technique that may help define adequate surgery. METHODS This retrospective study included consecutive patients referred to a cancer center between November 2016 and July 2017 for biopsy-confirmed invasive EBC management. The primary objective was to evaluate the rate of surgical changes after incorporating the results of the preoperative staging examination, including CEDM. RESULTS A total of 231 patients were screened for inclusion, and 132 patients were included, corresponding to 134 lesions. The first surgical plan was modified for 33 patients (25%), which represented 34 lesions. For 8 patients (6%), the surgery was cancelled in preference for neoadjuvant chemotherapy; for 16 patients (12.1%), the primary tumor procedure was enlarged; and for 23 patients (17.4%) the lymph node management was modified. Surgery was changed only due to the CEDM results for 24 patients (18.5%) and consisted of a more invasive procedure due to a more extended, multifocal or multicentric lesion than seen on the standard imaging. Anatomopathological surgery piece findings were well correlated with contrast-enhanced mammography results. Overall, there was no increase in the delay between the planned date of surgery and the effective surgical procedure (median 0 days). CONCLUSION CEDM added to preoperative staging helped define better surgical management without increasing delay in the surgical procedure. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE CEDM is a reliable technique that should be considered as part of preoperative staging for EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanny Montrognon
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital
Center, Rouen,
France
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel
Center, Rouen,
France
| | - Anca Berghian
- Department of Anatomopathology, Henri Becquerel
Center, Rouen,
France
| | | | | | - Diana Defta
- Department of Radiology, Henri Becquerel Center,
Rouen, France
| | - Anaïs Buquet
- Department of Radiology, Henri Becquerel Center,
Rouen, France
| | - Martine Ferret
- Department of Radiology, Henri Becquerel Center,
Rouen, France
| | - Justine Lequesne
- Department of Clinical Research, Henri Becquerel
Center, Rouen,
France
| | | | | | - Dragos Georgescu
- Department of Gynecology and Breast surgery, Henri Becquerel
Center, Rouen,
France
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moinard-Butot F, Saint-Martin C, Pflumio C, Carton M, Jacot W, Cottu PH, Diéras V, Dalenc F, Goncalves A, Debled M, Patsouris A, Mouret-Reynier MA, Vanlemmens L, Leheurteur M, Emile G, Ferrero JM, Desmoulins I, Uwer L, Eymard JC, Cheaib B, Courtinard C, Bachelot T, Chevrot M, Petit T. Efficacy of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and lapatinib after dual HER2 inhibition with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in patient with metastatic breast cancer: Retrospective data from a French multicenter real-life cohort. Breast 2022; 63:54-60. [PMID: 35299035 PMCID: PMC8927850 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1), as well as lapatinib plus capecitabine were proven effective in two Phase III studies, following first-line trastuzumab plus a taxane. The introduction of dual HER2 blockade by trastuzumab and pertuzumab as first-line has positioned T-DM1 into second-line, and lapatinib plus capecitabine beyond, without formal evaluation of these strategies. Methods ESME Data Platform (NCT03275311) included individual data from all patients aged ≥18 years, in whom first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was initiated between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. The efficacy of T-DM1 and lapatinib plus capecitabine combination, following double blockade associating trastuzumab and pertuzumab were evaluated in this national real-life database. Eligibility criteria were: female, MBC, HER2+ tumor, first-line taxane-based chemotherapy and dual HER2-blockage by trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. Cohort A received second-line T-DM1, and Cohort B second-line T-DM1 and third or fourth-line lapatinib plus capecitabine. Results Cohort A comprised 233 patients, and Cohort B 47 patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months in Cohort A and 4.6 months in Cohort B. Median overall survival were 36.7 months and 12.9 months, respectively. PFS was significantly dependent on the preceding treatment line's duration. In cohort A, HER2 expression status was a significant predictive factor of PFS. Conclusion First-line trastuzumab plus pertuzumab do not markedly diminish T-DM1's efficacy in second-line. Similarly, sequential treatment with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab then T-DM1 does not noticeably modify the efficacy of lapatinib plus capecitabine. French real-life cohort. Dual blockade HER2 does not markedly diminish T-DM1's activity in second-line and lapatinib's activity in third or fourth line. The second-line (T-DM1) PFS was significantly longer when the first-line treatment with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab was ≥12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Moinard-Butot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg - Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Caroline Saint-Martin
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Carole Pflumio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg - Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France
| | - Matthieu Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France; Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - Paul-Henri Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Nantes & Angers, 15 Rue André Boquel, 49055, Angers, France
| | - Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63011, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Laurence Vanlemmens
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rue d'Amiens, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - George Emile
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valambrose, 06189, Nice, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Bourgogne, 21079, Dijon, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Eymard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, 1 Rue du Général Koenig, 51100, Reims, France
| | - Bianca Cheaib
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Coralie Courtinard
- Unicancer, Data Office, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France; Université de Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Epicene Team, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Michaël Chevrot
- Unicancer, Data Office, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg - Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gaillard T, Carton M, Mailliez A, Desmoulins I, Mouret-Reynier M, Petit T, Leheurteur M, Dieras V, Ferrero J, Uwer L, Guiu S, Gonc¸alves A, Levy C, Debled M, Dalenc F, Patsouris A, Bachelot T, Eymard J, Chevrot M, Conversano A, Robain M, Hequet D. Corrigendum to “De novo metastatic breast cancer in patients with a small locoregional tumour (T1-T2/N0): characteristics and prognosis” [Eur J Cancer 158 (2021) 181–188]. Eur J Cancer 2022; 166:311-312. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
13
|
Carausu M, Carton M, Cabel L, Patsouris A, Levy C, Verret B, Pasquier D, Debled M, Gonçalves A, Desmoulins I, Lecouillard I, Bachelot T, Ferrero JM, Eymard JC, Mouret-Reynier MA, Chevrot M, De Maio E, Uwer L, Frenel JS, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Darlix A, Bozec L. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer patients with isolated central nervous system metastases in the multicentre ESME database. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221077082. [PMID: 35237352 PMCID: PMC8883300 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221077082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: As a result of progress in diagnosis and treatment, there is a growing prevalence of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with isolated CNS metastases. This study describes the largest-to-date real-life cohort of this clinical setting and compares it to other clinical presentations. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC database including patients who initiated treatment for MBC between 2008 and 2016. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Descriptive statistics and multivariate Cox model were used. Results: Of 22,266 patients, 647 (2.9%) and 929 (4.2%) patients had isolated first-site CNS metastases or combined with extra-CNS metastases, with longer OS for the group with isolated CNS metastases (16.9 versus 13.9 months, adjusted HR = 1.69 (95% CI: 1.50–1.91), p < 0.001). Among the 541 (2.4%) patients with isolated CNS metastases and no intrathecal therapy (excluding leptomeningeal metastases), HER2+ cases were preponderant over TN or HR+ /HER2− cases (41.6% versus 26.1% versus 28.5%, respectively, p < 0.01). The treatment strategy consisted of a combination of local treatment and systemic therapy (49.2%), local treatment only (35.5%) or systemic therapy only (11.4%), or symptomatic therapy only (3.9%). Median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 5.7–6.8). Median OS was 20.7 months (95% CI: 17.3–24.3), reaching 37.9 months (95% CI: 25.9–47.6) in the HR+ /HER2+ subgroup. Older age, TN subtype, MBC-free interval of 6–12 months, lower performance status, and WBRT were associated with poorer survival. Patients who received systemic therapy within 3 months from MBC diagnosis had longer OS (24.1 versus 16.1 months, p = 0.031), but this was not significant on multivariate analysis [HR = 1.0 (95% CI: 0.7–1.3), p = 0.806]. Conclusions: Patients with isolated CNS metastases at MBC diagnosis represent a distinct population for which the role of systemic therapy needs to be further investigated in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Carausu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Matthieu Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Luc Cabel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Benjamin Verret
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | | | | | - Eleonora De Maio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Sébastien Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest–René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Amélie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, INSERM U1191-CNRS UMR 5203, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurence Bozec
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 35 rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Allouchery V, Perdrix A, Calbrix C, Berghian A, Lequesne J, Fontanilles M, Leheurteur M, Etancelin P, Sarafan-Vasseur N, Di Fiore F, Clatot F. Circulating PIK3CA mutation detection at diagnosis in non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer patients. Sci Rep 2021; 11:24041. [PMID: 34911971 PMCID: PMC8674263 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02643-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive BC subtype with poor outcomes. A targetable somatic PIK3CA mutation is reported in 30% of IBC, allowing for treatment by PI3Kα-specific inhibitors, such as alpelisib. The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection rate of circulating PIK3CA mutation in locally-advanced IBC (LAIBC) patients harbouring a PIK3CA mutation on initial biopsy. This monocentric retrospective study was based on available stored plasma samples and tumour biopsies at diagnosis from all LAIBC patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) between 2008 and 2018 at the Centre Henri Becquerel. PIK3CA mutations (E542K, E545K, H1047R/L) were assessed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in plasma samples and tumoral tissue at diagnosis. A total of 55 patients were included. Overall, 14/55 patients (25%) had a PIK3CA mutation identified on baseline biopsy (H1047R = 8; H1047L = 3; E545K = 2; E542K = 1). Among them, 11 (79%) patients had enough DNA for circulating DNA analyses, and corresponding circulating PIK3CA mutations were found in 6/11 (55%). Among the 41 patients without PIK3CA mutations on biopsy, 32 (78%) had enough DNA for circulating DNA analysis, and no circulating PIK3CA mutation was identified. Our results revealed no prognostic or predictive value of PIK3CA mutations at the diagnosis of non-metastatic IBC but highlighted the prognostic value of the cfDNA rate at diagnosis. Our study showed that a corresponding circulating PIK3CA mutation was identified in 55% of LAIBC patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumours, while no circulating mutation was found among patients with PI3KCA wild-type tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violette Allouchery
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 1 Rue d'Amiens, 76038, Rouen Cedex 1, France.
| | - Anne Perdrix
- IRON Group, Inserm U1245, UNIROUEN, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Normandie Université, Rouen, France.,Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Céline Calbrix
- IRON Group, Inserm U1245, UNIROUEN, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Normandie Université, Rouen, France.,Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Anca Berghian
- Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Justine Lequesne
- Department of Biostatistics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Maxime Fontanilles
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 1 Rue d'Amiens, 76038, Rouen Cedex 1, France.,IRON Group, Inserm U1245, UNIROUEN, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Normandie Université, Rouen, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 1 Rue d'Amiens, 76038, Rouen Cedex 1, France
| | | | - Nasrin Sarafan-Vasseur
- IRON Group, Inserm U1245, UNIROUEN, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Normandie Université, Rouen, France.,Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Frédéric Di Fiore
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 1 Rue d'Amiens, 76038, Rouen Cedex 1, France.,IRON Group, Inserm U1245, UNIROUEN, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Normandie Université, Rouen, France.,Department of Gastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 1 Rue d'Amiens, 76038, Rouen Cedex 1, France.,IRON Group, Inserm U1245, UNIROUEN, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Normandie Université, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gaillard T, Carton M, Mailliez A, Desmoulins I, Mouret-Reynier MA, Petit T, Leheurteur M, Dieras V, Ferrero JM, Uwer L, Guiu S, Gonçalves A, Levy C, Debled M, Dalenc F, Patsouris A, Bachelot T, Eymard JC, Chevrot M, Conversano A, Robain M, Hequet D. De novo metastatic breast cancer in patients with a small locoregional tumour (T1-T2/N0): Characteristics and prognosis. Eur J Cancer 2021; 158:181-188. [PMID: 34689042 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The estimated rate of de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) at the time of diagnosis is between 5 to 12%. International guidelines recommend metastatic work-up (MWU) only in women with advanced breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and prognosis of patients with dnMBC diagnosed without an initial indication for MWU. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, comparative study in dnMBC patients selected from the ESME-MBC cohort. Patients were treated in France between 2008 and 2016. We compared two populations: patients in whom dnMBC was diagnosed by staging although not indicated by guidelines (non-guideline staging [NGS]) and those in whom dnMBC was diagnosed by guideline staging (GS). RESULTS During the study period, 22,463 patients with MBC were included in the ESME cohort. Among them, 6698 were dnMBC patients. In 247 of these patients (6% of dnMBC and 1% of the overall population), dnMBC was diagnosed by non-guideline staging. Women in this group were significantly younger (57 vs. 59 years, p = 0.02) and had fewer metastatic sites at diagnosis than dnMBC-GS patients. The two groups were not significantly different in terms of the other characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were better in the dnMBC-NGS group than in the dnMBC-GS group. The impact on survival was confirmed by univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 1.83 [1.31-2.57], p < 0.01). CONCLUSION This study provides the first description of a very specific population. These patients with dnMBC-NGS were younger and more likely to have oligometastatic disease with a better prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Gaillard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
| | - M Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - A Mailliez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - I Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - M A Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - T Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICANS Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - M Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - V Dieras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - J M Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - L Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - S Guiu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - A Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmette, Marseille, France
| | - C Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - M Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, IUCT-Oncopole Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - A Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers & Nantes, France
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - J C Eymard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France
| | - M Chevrot
- Real World Data Department, Unicancer Data Office, Paris, France
| | - A Conversano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M Robain
- Real World Data Department, Unicancer Data Office, Paris, France
| | - D Hequet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Frenel JS, Lusque A, Mailliez A, Bachelot T, Uwer L, Mouret Reynier M, Levy C, Jouannaud C, Gonçalves A, Patsouris A, Dieras V, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Cottu P, Ferrero JM, Villacroux O, D'Hondt V, Desmoulins I, Delaloge S, De Calbiac O. 291P HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Management and prognosis of a new breast cancer entity in a real-world setting. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
17
|
Frenel JS, Lusque A, Delaloge S, Ferrero JM, Bachelot T, Desmoulins I, Levy C, Eymard JC, Gonçalves A, Patsouris A, Reynier MM, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Cabel L, Uwer L, Debled M, Chevrot M, Mailliez A, Jacot W, De La Motte Rouge T. 231P Prognosis and efficacy of frontline treatment for HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer occurring in gBRCA1/2 carriers. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
18
|
Joly F, Rigal O, Guittet L, Lefèvre-Arbogast S, Grellard JM, Binarelli G, Lange M, Rieux C, Fernette M, Tron L, Gernier F, Travers R, Morel A, Richard D, Griffon B, Leconte A, Bastien E, Quilan F, Pépin LF, Jardin F, Leheurteur M, Clarisse B, Lequesne J, Faveyrial A. Post-traumatic stress symptomatology and adjustment of medical oncology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic among adult patients with cancer in a day care hospital. Cancer 2021; 127:4636-4645. [PMID: 34398970 PMCID: PMC8426939 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background The COVID‐19 pandemic may induce post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms among patients with cancer, who also face adaptations to their treatment. The authors assessed the occurrence of PTSD symptoms, investigated pandemic‐induced adjustments in medical oncology practice in patients with cancer, and explored risk factors for PTSD and the association between PTSD symptoms, insomnia, and quality of life (QoL). Methods This prospective French study was conducted in patients with solid/hematologic tumors who were receiving medical treatment in the day care departments of 2 cancer centers during the lockdown. Adjustments to medical oncology practice were collected from medical records. PTSD (measured using the Impact of Event Scale‐Revised), insomnia (measured using the Insomnia Severity Index), QoL (measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐General instrument), and cognitive complaints (measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Cognitive Function instrument) were collected through validated questionnaires. Results Clinical data and questionnaires were available for 734 and 576 patients, respectively. The median patient age was 64 years, and 69% of patients were women. Twenty‐one percent of patients had PTSD. Twenty‐seven percent (95% CI, 23%‐30%) had an adjustment in their medical oncology program, including adjournments (29%), treatment interruptions (16%), modified treatment plans (27%), or adapted monitoring (27%). Women and patients experiencing an adjustment in oncology practice had a higher odds of PTSD (odds ratio= 2.10 [95% CI, 1.07‐4.14] and 1.65 [95% CI, 1.03‐2.63]; P < .05). PTSD symptoms were correlated with worse scores for QoL, cognition, and insomnia. Conclusions Twenty‐one percent of patients with cancer experienced PTSD symptoms associated with poor QoL during the first COVID‐19–induced lockdown. Medical oncology practice was adjusted in approximately one‐quarter of patients and was associated with the occurrence of PTSD symptoms. Psychosocial support should be offered in cancer centers to promote emotional resilience and avoid PTSD symptoms in patients. Post‐traumatic stress disorder symptomatology occurred in 21% of patients with cancer during the first lockdown due to COVID‐19, was more frequent among women, and was associated with adjustment in medical oncology treatments. Caregivers should pay special attention to the psychological needs of patients with cancer to prevent or manage post‐traumatic stress disorder symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Joly
- Medical Oncology Department, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France.,Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France.,Clinical Research, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Olivier Rigal
- Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France.,Clinical Research, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France
| | - Lydia Guittet
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France
| | - Sophie Lefèvre-Arbogast
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France.,Clinical Research, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | | | - Giulia Binarelli
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France.,Clinical Research, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Marie Lange
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France.,Clinical Research, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Chantal Rieux
- Clinical Research, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Marie Fernette
- Clinical Research, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Laure Tron
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Adeline Morel
- Medical Oncology Department, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | | | | | | | - Etienne Bastien
- Medical Oncology Department, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Florian Quilan
- Medical Oncology Department, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | | | - Fabrice Jardin
- Clinical Research, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France.,Hematology, Henri Becquerel Center, Rouen, France
| | | | | | | | - Audrey Faveyrial
- Medical Oncology Department, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zelek L, Debourdeau P, Bourgeois H, Wagner JP, Brocard F, Lefeuvre-Plesse C, Chauffert B, Leheurteur M, Bachet JB, Simon H, Mayeur D, Scotté F. A Pragmatic Study Evaluating NEPA Versus Aprepitant for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1870-e1879. [PMID: 34216177 PMCID: PMC8488783 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurokinin (NK) 1 receptor antagonists (RAs), administered in combination with a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3 ) RA and dexamethasone (DEX), have demonstrated clear improvements in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prevention over a 5-HT3 RA plus DEX. However, studies comparing the NK1 RAs in the class are lacking. A fixed combination of a highly selective NK1 RA, netupitant, and the 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron (NEPA), simultaneously targets two critical antiemetic pathways, thereby offering a simple convenient antiemetic with long-lasting protection from CINV. This study is the first head-to-head NK1 RA comparative study in patients receiving anthracycline cyclophosphamide (AC) and non-AC moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, single-cycle, open-label, prospective study designed to demonstrate noninferiority of single-dose NEPA to a 3-day aprepitant regimen in preventing CINV in chemotherapy-naive patients receiving AC/non-AC MEC in a real-life setting. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (no emesis/no rescue) during the overall (0-120 hour) phase. Noninferiority was achieved if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference between NEPA and the aprepitant group was greater than the noninferiority margin set at -10%. RESULTS Noninferiority of NEPA versus aprepitant was demonstrated (risk difference 9.2%; 95% CI, -2.3% to 20.7%); the overall complete response rate was numerically higher for NEPA (64.9%) than aprepitant (54.1%). Secondary endpoints also revealed numerically higher rates for NEPA than aprepitant. CONCLUSION This pragmatic study in patients with cancer receiving AC and non-AC MEC revealed that a single dose of oral NEPA plus DEX was at least as effective as a 3-day aprepitant regimen, with indication of a potential efficacy benefit for NEPA. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE In the absence of comparative neurokinin 1 (NK1 ) receptor antagonist (RA) studies, guideline committees and clinicians consider NK1 RA agents to be interchangeable and equivalent. This is the first head-to-head study comparing one NK1 RA (oral netupitant/palonosetron [NEPA]) versus another (aprepitant) in patients receiving anthracycline cyclophosphamide (AC) and non-AC moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Noninferiority of NEPA versus the aprepitant regimen was demonstrated; the overall complete response (no emesis and no rescue use) rate was numerically higher for NEPA (65%) than aprepitant (54%). As a single-dose combination antiemetic, NEPA not only simplifies dosing but may offer a potential efficacy benefit over the current standard-of-care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hélène Simon
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Morvan, Brest, France
| | | | - Florian Scotté
- Interdisciplinary Cancer Course Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Juric D, Andre F, Panwar U, Janku F, Lu YS, Burris III HA, Cruz Jurado J, Papai Z, Stemmer SM, Tabernero J, Ahlgren J, Leheurteur M, Lorenzo I, Jankovic D, Quadt C, Hu H, Chen X, Rugo HS. Long-term (LT) disease control in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), PIK3CA-altered advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with alpelisib (ALP) + fulvestrant (FUL). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.1054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1054 Background: PIK3CA mutations, present in ̃40% of HR+, HER2– ABC, are associated with therapeutic resistance and shorter survival. Alpelisib (ALP) + fulvestrant (FUL) demonstrated efficacy in this population for which achieving long-term (LT) disease control is challenging. Here, we report on pts with HR+, PIK3CA-altered ABC who achieved LT disease control with ALP + FUL. Methods: SOLAR-1 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of ALP (or placebo) + FUL in HR+, HER2– ABC that progressed on/after an aromatase inhibitor. CBYL719X2101 (X2101) was a phase 1, open-label study of escalating ALP doses ± FUL in advanced solid tumors that progressed on/after anti-estrogen therapy (ET) or relapsed after adjuvant anti-ET. A cut-off ≥ median (progression-free survival [PFS] + 2 SE) was chosen based on Kaplan-Meier curves from SOLAR-1 to define LT disease control as PFS (SOLAR-1) or time on treatment (X2101) ≥18 mo. Results: In SOLAR-1, 51 of 169 pts (30.2%) randomized to ALP + FUL achieved LT disease control with a median PFS of 33.5 mo (95% CI, 27.4 mo-not reached). Baseline characteristics of pts in SOLAR-1 are in the table below. In pts with LT disease control, adverse events (AEs) of special interest (combined preferred terms) of GI toxicity were observed in 47 pts (92.2%; grade ≥3: 11.8%, n=6), of hyperglycemia in 41 pts (80.4%; grade ≥3: 39.2%, n=20), and of rash in 28 pts (54.9%; grade ≥3: 19.6%, n=10). Median ALP relative dose intensity was 79.9% and 82.1% for pts with LT disease control (n=51) and the overall population (n=168), respectively. In X2101, 7 of 52 pts (13.5%) with ABC who received ALP+FUL achieved LT disease control up to 47.8 mo. Conclusions: In this subset of pts with hard-to-treat, endocrine-resistant disease, LT disease control ≥18 mo is meaningful considering median PFS of 4.6-9.3 mo or 9.5-16.4 mo with FUL alone or with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, respectively. Here, LT disease control was observed in 2 studies of HR+, PIK3CA-altered ABC, including in pts with poor prognosis, diabetes/pre-diabetes at baseline, and heavy pre-treatment. AE profile was consistent with prior reports and did not preclude LT disease control. Further work is needed to better understand factors influencing LT disease control. Clinical trial information: NCT01219699, NCT02437318 .[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dejan Juric
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Udaiveer Panwar
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Yen-Shen Lu
- National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | - Salomon M. Stemmer
- Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqwa, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Johan Ahlgren
- Regionalt cancercentrum Mellansverige, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Cornelia Quadt
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Huilin Hu
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
| | - Xueying Chen
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Joly F, Lefèvre-Arbogast S, Rigal O, Bastien E, Guittet L, Grellard JM, Lange M, Leconte A, Quilan F, Travers R, Morel A, Pépin LF, Jardin F, Leheurteur M, Lequesne J, Clarisse B, Binarelli G, Faveyrial A. Evolution of post-traumatic stress disorder and patient reported-outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic among cancer patients of the French longitudinal COVIPACT study. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.12123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
12123 Background: Sudden COVID-19 pandemic has enforced social restrictions across the globe, including social distancing, curfews and total lockdowns, which persist in many parts of the world. Beyond these measures, cancer patients have faced up to the threat of the risk of severe COVID-19 infections and the adaptations of medical oncology practices, with potential impact on their psychological well-being. We aimed to follow Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms and other Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) over this period among cancer patients from the French COVIPACT study. Methods: The COVIPACT study (NCT04366154) included patients with solid/hematologic malignancy receiving medical treatment during the first lockdown in outpatient departments of two cancer centers. Patients were asked to fulfill validated questionnaires on PTSD symptoms (IES-R), insomnia (ISI), quality of life (FACT-G) and cognition (FACT-Cog) at baseline (M0, first lockdown, Apr/May 2020), 3 months (M3, post-lockdown, Jul/Aug 2020) and 6 months (M6, second lockdown, Oct/Nov 2020). PTSD was defined as an IES-R score ≥33 and moderate/severe insomnia as an ISI score ≥15. Higher values on the FACT-G (range 0-108) and FACT-Cog (PCI subscale range 0-72) indicated better quality of life and cognition, respectively. Changes in PROs over time were assessed using mixed models for repeated measures. Results: Among the 734 patients included in COVIPACT, 579, 347 and 328 completed the questionnaires at M0, M3 and M6, respectively: median age, 64 years, 72% women, 59% metastatic status. Patients were mostly treated for breast (44%), lung, head and neck (20%), digestive (16%) and gynecologic cancers (11%). We observed a J-shaped evolution of PTSD over time, affecting 21.2% of patients during the first lockdown, 13.6% the post-lockdown and 23.6% during the second lockdown (p for time < 0.001). Moreover, patients reported linear deterioration of cognitive function over follow-up (p < 0.001). No change was observed in any dimension of quality of life (p for time = 0.06). 24.3%, 27.1% and 28.1% of the patients reported insomnia at M0,M3 and M6 (p for time = 0.35). At each time, PTSD was associated with more insomnia, worst quality of life and cognitive complain. At all the times, ≥50% of patients with PTSD reported insomnia compared to ≤23% in non-PTSD patients (p < 0.001). In addition, there was a clinically significant difference of ≥16 points on the FACT-G and ≥8 points on the FACT-Cog PCI between PTSD and non-PTSD patients (p < 0.001) at the all times. Conclusions: More than 20% of patients have developed PTSD during the different periods of lockdown, with strong association with poor quality of life, cognitive complain and insomnia. Psychosocial support promoting emotional resilience should be largely offered to cancer patients to prevent and/or reduce PTSD. Clinical trial information: NCT04366154.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Etienne Bastien
- Centre François Baclesse, Medical Oncology Department, Caen, France
| | - Lydia Guittet
- Caen University Hospital, Inserm U1086, Caen, France
| | | | - Marie Lange
- Centre François Baclesse, Clinical Research Department, Inserm U1086, Caen, France
| | - Alexandra Leconte
- Centre François Baclesse, Clinical Research Department, Caen, France
| | - Florian Quilan
- Centre François Baclesse, Medical Oncology Department, Caen, France
| | | | - Adeline Morel
- Centre François Baclesse, Medical Oncology Department, Caen, France
| | | | - Fabrice Jardin
- Department of Hematology, Inserm U918, Centre henri Becquerel, University of Normandy, Rouen, France
| | | | - Justine Lequesne
- Centre François Baclesse, Clinical Research Department, Caen, France
| | | | - Giulia Binarelli
- Centre François Baclesse, Clinical Research Deparmtent, Inserm U1086, Caen, France
| | - Audrey Faveyrial
- Centre François Baclesse, Medical Oncology Department, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ray-Coquard IL, Savoye AM, Mouret-Reynier MA, Chabaud S, Derbel O, Kalbacher E, Leheurteur M, Martinez A, Cornila C, Martinez M, Bengrine L, Priou F, Cloarec N, Venat-Bouvet L, Selle F, Berton D, Collard O, Joly F, Tredan O. Efficacy and safety results from neopembrov study, a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with or without pembrolizumab (P) followed by interval debulking surgery and standard systemic therapy ± P for advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC): A GINECO study. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5500 Background: To investigate whether adding Pembrolizumab (P) to neoadjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy (CP) may increase the optimal debulking rate, assessed by Complete Resection Rate (CRR) after Interval Debulking Surgery (IDS) in patients (pts) with initially unresectable International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC/IV ovarian, tubal or peritoneal HGSC. Methods: Multicenter, open-label, non-comparative randomized phase II trial. Pts were randomized (2:1) to receive 4 cycles of CP ± P before IDS. After IDS, all patients received post-operative chemotherapy (2 to 4 cycles) and optional bevacizumab for 15 months in total ± P as maintenance therapy for up to 2 years. Randomization was stratified on center, FIGO stage, Bev planned after IDS and disease volume (<5cm/>5cm). Primary endpoint was the centrally reviewed CRR at IDS. 60 pts were planned in the CP+P arm (A'Hern's single-stage design P0=50%, P1=70%). Safety (particularly due to P addition), surgical morbidity, ORR, PFS and OS were secondary endpoints. Results: 91 pts were randomized from 02/18 to 04/19 with a median Peritoneal Cancer Index at 24 (range 7-39). 80 pts (88%) received Bev in combination with CP followed by bev ± P in maintenance. In the CP+P group (n=61), 58 (95%) pts had IDS and 78% achieved complete resection. The CRR in this group was 74%, statistically superior to the pre-defined hypothesis. In the CP group, CRR was 70% (29/30 pts underwent IDS). Complete resection after strictly 4 cycles of CP±P was obtained for 41 pts (71%) and 17 (58%) pts in CP+P and CP group, respectively (sensitivity analysis). For CP+P group, numerically higher ORRs were observed before IDS compared to CP group (76% vs 61%). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AE) occurred in 75% of the CP+P group and 67% in the CP group: mainly blood and lymphatic, gastrointestinal and vascular disorders. Postoperative AE (mainly infectious, vascular and gastrointestinal) occurred in 20% and 13% of the pts in CP+P and CP arm, respectively. No difference in the number of fatal events between the two arms: 2 in the experimental arm vs 1 in the control arm. Progression free survival rate at 18 months was 61% (95CI% [47-73]) and 57% (95CI% [37-72]) in CP+P and CP arm, respectively. Conclusions: P may be safely added to preoperative treatment in pts deemed non-optimally resectable. The primary objective was met with an improved CRR on CP+P arm. The CRR in the control group was higher than expected. Survival data and translational research including PDL1 status are ongoing to better define P as treatment option in this setting. Clinical trial information: 2016-004-163-39. Clinical trial information: NCT03275506.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sylvie Chabaud
- Departement of Clinical Research,Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Olfa Derbel
- Institut de Cancérologie, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Frank Priou
- CHD Vendee-Hopital Les Oudairies, La Roche-sur-Yon, France
| | | | | | - Frederic Selle
- Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, and GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Berton
- GINECO & Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Olivier Collard
- Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, St. Priest En Jarez, France
| | - Florence Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Olivier Tredan
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Carausu M, Carton M, Darlix A, Pasquier D, Leheurteur M, Debled M, Mouret-Reynier MA, Gonçalves A, Dalenc F, Verret B, Campone M, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Fumet JD, Lefeuvre-Plesse C, Petit T, Jouannaud C, Larrouquere L, Chevrot M, Cabel L. 102P Breast cancer patients treated with intrathecal therapy for leptomeningeal metastases: Characteristics and validation of prognostic models in a large real-life database. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
24
|
Jacot W, Lusque A, Mailliez A, De la Motte Rouge T, Cabel L, Levy C, Patsouris A, Desmoulins I, Uwer L, Leheurteur M, Robain M, Caron O, Bachelot T, Filleron T, Frenel JS, Delaloge S. Abstract PD10-11: Efficacy of Platinum-based first-line chemotherapy among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients according to the germline BRCA1/2 mutational status: An analysis of the French ESME MBC database. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-pd10-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens (PtCT) have been shown to increase treatment efficacy when combined to neoadjuvant standard of care treatment of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). In the metastatic breast cancer (MBC) setting, preclinical and clinical data suggest that PtCT could be more efficient than non-platinum based ones (non-PtCT) among patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCAm). However, published data remain controversial on this topic, particularly for MBC. We evaluated the progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) under first-line PtCT and non-PtCT among gBRCAm carriers in ESME, a nationwide real-life MBC database. Methods: ESME MBC database (NCT03275311), is a unique national cohort of all consecutive pts who initiated a first-line treatment for MBC between 2008 and 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Women with HER2- MBC and known hormone receptors (HR) and gBRCA1/2 (before or in the 6 first months of metastatic disease, gBRCAm / wild type / not tested) status, who received a first-line MBC CT were selected. Patients with other germinal mutations were considered as wild type. Primary objectives were OS and PFS under first-line CT (PtCT vs. non-PtCT) in the TNBC gBRCA1/2m population.Secondary objectives were OS and PFS during first-line CT (PtCT vs. non-PtCT) in the TNBC wild-type and “not tested” population, as well as among the HR+/HER2- pts.To avoid guarantee time bias related to oncogenetic testing, analyses were performed at baseline (CT initiation) and different landmark time points (3-month or 6-month after CT initiation). Thus, BRCA status was defined according to oncogenetic testings performed before the landmark time, and patients who progressed or censored before the landmark time were excluded. Results: 10,164 pts (2,794 TNBC; 7,370 HR+/HER2-) were included in this analysis. Pts who received PtCT were significantly younger, affected by a gBRCA1/2m, had a high histological grade and/or TNBC tumor, with more frequent visceral and central nervous system spreading than non PtCT ones. Median follow-up was 51.1 months [95%CI 49.6; 52.6]. All reported results were based on the gBRCA status defined at CT initiation and on multivariable analysis adjusted on age at MBC diagnosis, de novo MBC status, type and number of metastases. In the gBRCA1/2m TNBC population (N=132), PtCT was independently associated with a better PFS compared to non-PtCT (HR=0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.84, p=0.005), without significant difference in OS (HR=0.79, 95%CI 0.51-1.23, p=0.29).No difference was seen in wild-type BRCA1/2 TNBC pts (N=269) according to the CT regimen, while, in the larger population of untested TNBC (N=2,393), PtCT was associated with worse OS (HR=1.18, 95%CI 1.03-1.34, p=0.016) compared to non-PtCT regimens, without significant difference in PFS (HR=1.07, 95%CI 0.95-1.22, p=0.26). No significant difference was seen regarding PFS nor OS in gBRCA1/2m HR+/HER2- pts (N=124) and in the wild-type BRCA1/2 HR+/HER2- population.However, in the larger population of untested HR+/HER2- pts (N=6,836), PtCT was independently associated with worse OS (HR=2.15, 95%CI 1.79-2.59, p<0.001) and PFS (HR=1.57, 95%CI 1.33-1.86, p<0.001) compared to non-PtCT regimens. Results were similar in landmark analyses at 3-month or 6-month after CT initiation. Conclusions: This large-scale real-life analysis suggests higher efficacy of PtCT in term of PFS in gBRCA1/2m TNBC pts. The small sample size and post-1st line treatments may preclude observing a significant OS difference. PtCT appeared however associated with worse outcomes in untested TNBC and HR+/HER2- pts. These results emphasize the need for BRCA1/2 characterization before considering these regimens in the MBC setting.
Citation Format: William Jacot, Amélie Lusque, Audrey Mailliez, Thibault De la Motte Rouge, Luc Cabel, Christelle Levy, Anne Patsouris, Isabelle Desmoulins, Lionel Uwer, Marianne Leheurteur, Mathieu Robain, Olivier Caron, Thomas Bachelot, Thomas Filleron, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Suzette Delaloge. Efficacy of Platinum-based first-line chemotherapy among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients according to the germline BRCA1/2 mutational status: An analysis of the French ESME MBC database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Jacot
- 1Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Amélie Lusque
- 2Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Luc Cabel
- 5Institut Curie - UMR 144 - CNRS, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne Patsouris
- 7Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Pays de Loire, Angers, France
| | | | - Lionel Uwer
- 9Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Thureau S, Marchesi V, Vieillard MH, Perrier L, Lisbona A, Leheurteur M, Tredaniel J, Culine S, Dubray B, Bonnet N, Asselain B, Salleron J, Faivre JC. Efficacy of extracranial stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) added to standard treatment in patients with solid tumors (breast, prostate and non-small cell lung cancer) with up to 3 bone-only metastases: study protocol for a randomised phase III trial (STEREO-OS). BMC Cancer 2021; 21:117. [PMID: 33541288 PMCID: PMC7863429 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07828-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is an innovative modality based on high precision planning and delivery. Cancer with bone metastases and oligometastases are associated with an intermediate or good prognosis. We assume that prolonged survival rates would be achieved if both the primary tumor and metastases are controlled by local treatment. Our purpose is to demonstrate, via a multicenter randomized phase III trial, that local treatment of metastatic sites with curative intent with SBRT associated of systemic standard of care treatment would improve the progression-free survival in patients with solid tumor (breast, prostate and non-small cell lung cancer) with up to 3 bone-only metastases compared to patients who received systemic standard of care treatment alone. METHODS This is an open-labeled randomized superiority multicenter phase III trial. Patients with up to 3 bone-only metastases will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio.between Arm A (Experimental group): Standard care of treatment & SBRT to all bone metastases, and Arm B (Control group): standard care of treatment. For patients receiving SBRT, radiotherapy dose and fractionation depends on the site of the bone metastasis and the proximity to critical normal structures. This study aims to accrue a total of 196 patients within 4 years. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 1 year, and secondary endpoints include Bone progression-free survival; Local control; Cancer-specific survival; Overall survival; Toxicity; Quality of life; Pain score analysis, Cost-utility analysis; Cost-effectiveness analysis and Budget impact analysis. DISCUSSION The expected benefit for the patient in the experimental arm is a longer expectancy of life without skeletal recurrence and the discomfort, pain and drastic reduction of mobility and handicap that the lack of local control of bone metastases eventually inflicts. TRIALS REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03143322 Registered on May 8th 2017. Ongoing study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Thureau
- Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics Department, Henri-Becquerel Comprehensive Cancer Center, rue d'Amiens, F-76 000, Rouen, France. .,EA4108 QuantIf Litis, University of Rouen, 22 boulevard Gambetta, 76000, Rouen, France.
| | - Vincent Marchesi
- Academic Radiation Oncology & Brachytherapy Department, Lorraine Institute of Cancerology - Alexis-Vautrin Comprehensive Cancer Center, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Marie-Hélène Vieillard
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospital of Lille, 2 avenue Oscar Lambret, 59 000, Lille, France
| | - Lionel Perrier
- UMR CNRS 5824, Léon Bérard Comprehensive Cancer Center, 28 rue laennec, 69 373, Lyon, France
| | - Albert Lisbona
- Academic Radiation Oncology & Brachytherapy Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - René Gauducheau Comprehensive Cancer Center, Boulevard Professeur Jacques Monod, 44805, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Medical Oncology Department, Henri-Becquerel Comprehensive Cancer Center, rue d'Amiens, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Jean Tredaniel
- Pneumology Department, University Hospital of Paris (Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph), 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Culine
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Paris (Saint-Louis Hospital), 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France.,Paris Diderot University, 16 rue Huchard, 75018, Paris, France
| | - Bernard Dubray
- Radiation Oncology & Medical Physics Department, Henri-Becquerel Comprehensive Cancer Center, rue d'Amiens, F-76 000, Rouen, France.,EA4108 QuantIf Litis, University of Rouen, 22 boulevard Gambetta, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Naïma Bonnet
- Unicancer, 101, rue de Tolbiac, F-75654, Paris, France
| | | | - Julia Salleron
- Biostatistics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis-Vautrin Comprehensive Cancer Center, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, F-54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Faivre
- Academic Radiation Oncology & Brachytherapy Department, Lorraine Institute of Cancerology - Alexis-Vautrin Comprehensive Cancer Center, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sirieix J, Fraisse J, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Leheurteur M, Vanlemmens L, Jouannaud C, Diéras V, Lévy C, Ung M, Mouret-Reynier MA, Petit T, Coudert B, Brain E, Pistilli B, Ferrero JM, Goncalves A, Uwer L, Patsouris A, Tredan O, Courtinard C, Gourgou S, Frénel JS. Management and outcome of male metastatic breast cancer in the national multicenter observational research program Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME). Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 12:1758835920980548. [PMID: 33488779 PMCID: PMC7768846 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920980548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims: Because of its low prevalence, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in males is managed based on clinical experience with women. Using a real-life database, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of male MBC characteristics, management and outcome. Methods: The Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics Data Platform collected data for all men and women ⩾18 years with MBC in 18 participating French Comprehensive Cancer Centers from January 2008 to November 2016. Demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics were retrieved, as was treatment modality. Men were matched 1:1 to women with similar characteristics. Results: Of 16,701 evaluable patients, 149 (0.89%) men were identified. These men were older (median age 69 years) and predominantly had hormone receptor HR+/HER2– disease (78.3%). Median overall survival (OS) was 41.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI: 26.9–49.7)] and similar to women. Median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line therapy was 9.3 months [95% CI (7.4–11.5)]. In the HR+/HER2– subpopulation, endocrine therapy (ET) alone was the frontline treatment for 43% of patients, including antiestrogens (n = 19), aromatase inhibitors (n = 15) with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs (n = 3), and various sequential treatments. Median PFS achieved by frontline ET alone was similar in men [9.8 months, 95% CI (6.9–17.4)] and in women [13 months, 95% CI (8.4–30.9)] (p = 0.80). PFS was similar for HR+/HER2– men receiving upfront ET or chemotherapy: 9.8 months [95% CI (6.9–17.4)] versus 9.5 months [95% CI (7.4–11.7)] (p = 0.22), respectively. Conclusion: MBC management in men and women leads to similar outcomes, especially in HR+/HER2– patients for whom ET should also be a cornerstone. Unsolved questions remain and successfully recruiting trials for men are still lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junien Sirieix
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest - René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Julien Fraisse
- Biometrics Unit, ICM Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier
- Bordeaux University, Inserm CIC1401 and Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | - Véronique Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Christelle Lévy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Mony Ung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, GINECO & Paul Strauss Cancer Center and University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Bruno Coudert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest - Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Olivier Tredan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Sophie Gourgou
- Biometrics Unit, ICM Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Sébastien Frénel
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest - René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Saleh K, Carton M, Dieras V, Heudel PE, Brain E, D'Hondt V, Mailliez A, Patsouris A, Mouret-Reynier MA, Goncalves A, Ferrero JM, Petit T, Emile G, Uwer L, Debled M, Dalenc F, Jouannaud C, Ladoire S, Leheurteur M, Cottu P, Veron L, Savignoni A, Courtinard C, Robain M, Delaloge S, Deluche E. Impact of body mass index on overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast 2020; 55:16-24. [PMID: 33307392 PMCID: PMC7725947 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High Body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for breast cancer among postmenopausal women and an adverse prognostic factor in early-stage. Little is known about its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS The National ESME-MBC observational cohort includes all consecutive patients newly diagnosed with MBC between Jan 2008 and Dec 2016 in the 18 French comprehensive cancer centers. RESULTS Of 22 463 patients in ESME-MBC, 12 999 women had BMI data available at MBC diagnosis. Median BMI was 24.9 kg/m2 (range 12.1-66.5); 20% of women were obese and 5% underweight. Obesity was associated with more de novo MBC, while underweight patients had more aggressive cancer features. Median overall survival (OS) of the BMI cohort was 47.4 months (95% CI [46.2-48.5]) (median follow-up: 48.6 months). Underweight was independently associated with a worse OS (median OS 33 months; HR 1.14, 95%CI, 1.02-1.27) and first line progression-free survival (HR, 1.11; 95%CI, 1.01; 1.22), while overweight or obesity had no effect. CONCLUSION Overweight and obesity are not associated with poorer outcomes in women with metastatic disease, while underweight appears as an independent adverse prognostic factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalil Saleh
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Matthieu Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Véronique Dieras
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugéne Marquis, Avenue de La Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre-Etienne Heudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Véronique D'Hondt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, France
| | - Audrey Mailliez
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest Nantes & Angers, 15 Rue André Boquel, 49055, Angers, France
| | - Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63011, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Jean Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valambrose, 06189, Nice, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, 3 Rue de La Porte de L'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - George Emile
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue Du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonie, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Christelle Jouannaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, 1 Rue Du Général Koenig, 51100, Reims, France
| | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 Rue Professeur Marion, 21079, Dijon, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rue D'Amiens, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Lucie Veron
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexia Savignoni
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Coralie Courtinard
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Mathieu Robain
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France.
| | - Elise Deluche
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France; Department of Medical Oncology, CHU de Limoges, 2 Avenue Martin Luther King, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pérol D, Carton M, Delaloge S, Mailliez A, Frenel JS, Patsouris A, Levy C, Guiu S, Goncalves A, Mouret-Reynier MA, Desmoulins I, Ferrero JM, De La Motte Rouge T, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Guesmia T, Cabel L, Debled M, Bachelot T, Dalenc F, Uwer L, Jouannaud C, Robain M. Facteurs pronostiques de la survie sans progression chez les patientes atteintes d’un cancer du sein métastatique de type RH+/HER2- avant l’avènement des inhibiteurs CDK dans la cohorte nationale ESME. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2020.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
29
|
Allouchery V, Perdrix A, Calbrix C, Berghian A, Lequesne J, Fontanilles M, Leheurteur M, Etancelin P, Sarafan Vasseur N, Di Fiore F, Clatot F. 265P Circulating PIK3CA mutation detection at diagnosis in non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
30
|
Frasca M, Sabathe C, Delaloge S, Galvin A, Patsouris A, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Desmoulins I, Vanlemmens L, Bachelot T, Goncalves A, Perotin V, Uwer L, Frenel JS, Ferrero JM, Bouleuc C, Eymard JC, Dieras V, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Dalenc F, Jaffre A, Chevrot M, Courtinard C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. Palliative care delivery according to age in 12,000 women with metastatic breast cancer: Analysis in the multicentre ESME-MBC cohort 2008-2016. Eur J Cancer 2020; 137:240-249. [PMID: 32805641 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often require inpatient palliative care (IPC). However, mounting evidence suggests age-related disparities in palliative care delivery. This study aimed to assess the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of IPC delivery, as well as the influence of age. METHODS The national ESME (Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical)-MBC cohort includes consecutive MBC patients treated in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. ICD-10 palliative care coding was used for IPC identification. RESULTS Our analysis included 12,375 patients, 5093 (41.2%) of whom were aged 65 or over. The median follow-up was 41.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.5-42.5). The CIF of IPC was 10.3% (95% CI, 10.2-10.4) and 24.8% (95% CI, 24.7-24.8) at 2 and 8 years, respectively. At 2 years, among triple-negative patients, young patients (<65 yo) had a higher CIF of IPC than older patients after adjusting for cancer characteristics, centre and period (65+/<65: β = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.01). Among other tumour sub-types, older patients received short-term IPC more frequently than young patients (65+/<65: β = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03). At 8 years, outside large centres, IPC was delivered less frequently to older patients adjusted to cancer characteristics and period (65+/<65: β = -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01). CONCLUSION We found a relatively low CIF of IPC and that age influenced IPC delivery. Young triple-negative and older non-triple-negative patients needed more short-term IPCs. Older patients diagnosed outside large centres received less long-term IPC. These findings highlight the need for a wider implementation of IPC facilities and for more age-specific interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Frasca
- University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, Epicene Team, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France; Department of Palliative Medicine, CHU Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Camille Sabathe
- University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, Biostatistic Team, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Angeline Galvin
- University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, Epicene Team, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest - Paul Papin, 49933, Angers, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3, Avenue Du Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France
| | - Marie A Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63011, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, 1 Rue Professeur Marion, 21079, Dijon, France
| | - Laurence Vanlemmens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Virginie Perotin
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Institut Du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean S Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest - René Gauducheau, Boulevard Professeur Jacques Monod, 44805, Nantes, France
| | - Jean M Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valambrose, 06189, Nice, France
| | - Carole Bouleuc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm; 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Jean C Eymard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, 1 Rue de Général Koenig, 51100, Reims, France
| | - Véronique Dieras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Avenue de La Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rue D'Amiens, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, 3 Rue de La Porte de L'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Jaffre
- Department of Medical Information, Institut Bergonie, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Michaël Chevrot
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Coralie Courtinard
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier
- University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, Epicene Team, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France; INSERM CIC1401, Institut Bergonie, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Collet L, Eberst L, Fraisse J, Debled M, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Desmoulins I, Goncalves A, Campone M, Ferrero JM, Brain E, Dieras V, Petit T, Simon G, Leheurteur M, Dalenc F, Vanlemmens L, Darlix A, Arnedos M, Bachelot T. Clinical outcome of patients experiencing central nervous system progression on first-line pertuzumab and trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in a real-life cohort. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.2527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2527 Background: Isolated central nervous system (CNS) progression on first-line systemic therapy with Trastuzumab (T) and Pertuzumab (P) for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a therapeutic challenge. Our aim was to describe the clinical outcome and current treatment strategies for such patients in a large retrospective cohort. Methods: Patients (pts) were selected among all MBC pts included in the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) database involving 18 specialized cancer centers (NCT03275311). CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from diagnostic of brain metastases (BM) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Between January 2008 and December 2016, 995 pts were treated with first-line T and P for their HER2-positive MBC. They were 55 years old in median, with tumors expressing hormone-receptors in 62%. A total of 132 pts (13%) experienced isolated CNS progression on T and P, with a median time from metastatic diagnosis to CNS progression of 12 months. It was the first CNS progression for 108 pts (82%) while 24 (18%) already had BM at time of metastatic relapse. After CNS progression, T and P were continued for 58% of pts (n = 73). The remaining 47 pts were switched to another HER2-directed therapy (T-DM1 for 57%, T alone or combined with chemotherapy for 36% and lapatinib for 21%). Among those 132 pts, 37% received whole-brain radiotherapy, 18% stereotactic radiation therapy, and 11% surgery. Systemic treatment was combined with CNS-directed therapy for 50% of pts. Median follow-up is 21 months (95%CI: 14.9-25.5) from the diagnosis of CNS metastases. Median OS (mOS) of the 132 pts is 35 months (95%CI: 29.2-53,6), and median PFS 7 months (95%CI: 6.3- 9.2). A total of 77 pts (58.3%) experienced a new CNS progression with a median CNS-PFS of 9 months (95%CI: 7.6-12,0). Patient who stayed on T and P had a significantly better OS in comparison to pts who were switched to another systemic HER2-directed therapy (mOS not evaluable vs23 months), whereas PFS and CNS-PFS were similar between groups. Conclusions: In this real life setting, isolated CNS progression occurred among 13% of pts with HER2+ MBC on first-line treatment with T and P, after a median time of 12 months. Following current ASCO recommendations, continuation of T and P after CNS-directed therapy, seemed to be adequate. Nevertheless, time to subsequent progression is short and better therapeutic options are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Julien Fraisse
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Christelle Levy
- Centre François Baclesse, Department of Medical Oncology, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Anthony Goncalves
- Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Mario Campone
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, René Gauducheau, St Herblain, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | | | - Thierry Petit
- Paul Strauss Cancer Center and University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, CRCT, Inserm, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Amelie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
You B, Robelin P, Tod M, Louvet C, Lotz JP, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Fabbro M, Desauw C, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Kurtz JE, Follana P, Leheurteur M, Piano FD, Ferron G, De Rauglaudre G, Ray-Coquard I, Combe P, Chevalier-Place A, Joly F, Leary A, Pujade-Lauraine E, Freyer G, Colomban O. CA-125 ELIMination Rate Constant K (KELIM) Is a Marker of Chemosensitivity in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: Results from the Phase II CHIVA Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:4625-4632. [PMID: 32209570 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the first-line treatment success will depend on both the tumor-primary chemosensitivity and the completeness of interval debulking surgery (IDS). The modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), calculated with the CA-125 longitudinal kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days, is a validated early marker of tumor chemosensitivity. The objective was to investigate the role of the chemosensitivity relative to the success of first-line medical-surgical treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The CA-125 concentrations were prospectively measured in the randomized phase II trial CHIVA (NCT01583322, carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen ± nintedanib, and IDS, n = 188 patients). The KELIM predictive value regarding the tumor response rate, likelihood of complete IDS, risk of subsequent platinum-resistant relapse (PtRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariate and multivariate tests. RESULTS The data from 134 patients were analyzed. KELIM was an independent and major predictor of subsequent PtRR risk, and of survivals. The final logistic regression model, including KELIM [OR = 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03-0.49] and complete IDS (no vs. yes, OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.76) highlights the preponderant role of chemosensitivity on the success of the first-line treatment. In patients with highly chemosensitive diseases, the patient prognosis was driven more by the chemotherapy-induced antitumor effects than by the surgery. CONCLUSIONS The tumor-primary chemosensitivity, assessed by the modeled CA-125 KELIM calculated during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (http://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/CA-125-neo), may be a major parameter to consider for decision-making regarding IDS attempt, and selecting patients for treatments meant to reverse the primary chemoresistance.See related commentary by May and Oza, p. 4432.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit You
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France. .,Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, GINECO, GINEGEPS, Lyon, France
| | - Patrick Robelin
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.,Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, GINECO, GINEGEPS, Lyon, France
| | - Michel Tod
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.,Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pharmacie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France
| | - Christophe Louvet
- L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Service d'oncologie, GINECO, Paris, France
| | | | - Sophie Abadie-Lacourtoisie
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - ICO - Site Paul Papin, Oncologie médicale gynécologique, Angers, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Michel Fabbro
- ICM Val d'Aurelle Parc Euromedecine, Oncologie médicale, Montpellier, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Desauw
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Oncologie médicale, Lille Cedex, GINECO, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Service d'Oncologie et d'Hématologie, Strasbourg, France
| | - Philippe Follana
- CLCC Antoine Lacassagne, Département d'Hématologie - Oncologie médicale, NICE CEDEX 2, GINECO, Paris, France
| | | | - Francesco Del Piano
- Hôpitaux de LEMAN, Chirurgie Gynécologique, THONON LES BAINS, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Gwénael Ferron
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, TOULOUSE, France
| | - Gaëtan De Rauglaudre
- Institut Sainte-Catherine, Oncologie radiothérapie, Avignon, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, & Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Combe
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Oncologie Médicale, GINECO, Paris, France
| | | | - Florence Joly
- Centre François Baclesse, Oncologie Médicale, GINECO, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Gilles Freyer
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.,Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, GINECO, GINEGEPS, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Colomban
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Deluche E, Antoine A, Bachelot T, Lardy-Cleaud A, Dieras V, Brain E, Debled M, Jacot W, Mouret-Reynier MA, Goncalves A, Dalenc F, Patsouris A, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Lorgis V, Vanlemmens L, Lefeuvre-Plesse C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Petit T, Uwer L, Jouannaud C, Leheurteur M, Lacroix-Triki M, Courtinard C, Perol D, Robain M, Delaloge S. Contemporary outcomes of metastatic breast cancer among 22,000 women from the multicentre ESME cohort 2008-2016. Eur J Cancer 2020; 129:60-70. [PMID: 32135312 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM Real-world data inform the outcome comparisons and help the development of new therapeutic strategies. To this end, we aimed to describe the full characteristics and outcomes in the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) cohort, a large national contemporary observational database of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS Women aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed MBC and who initiated MBC treatment between January 2008 and December 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers (N = 22,109) were included. We assessed the full patients' characteristics, first-line treatments, overall survival (OS) and first-line progression-free survival, as well as updated prognostic factors in the whole cohort and among the 3 major subtypes: hormone receptor positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-, n = 13,656), HER2-positive (HER2+, n = 4017) and triple-negative (n = 2963) tumours. RESULTS The median OS of the whole cohort was 39.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.7-40.3). Five-year OS was 33.8%. OS differed significantly between the 3 subtypes (p < 0.0001) with a median OS of 43.3 (95% CI, 42.5-44.5) in HR+/HER2-; 50.1 (95% CI, 47.6-53.1) in HER2+; and 14.8 months (95% CI, 14.1-15.5) in triple-negative subgroups, respectively. Beyond performance status, the following variables had a constant significant negative prognostic impact on OS in the whole cohort and among subtypes: older age at diagnosis of metastases (except for the triple-negative subtype), metastasis-free interval between 6 and 24 months, presence of visceral metastases and number of metastatic sites ≥ 3. CONCLUSIONS The ESME program represents a unique large-scale real-life cohort on MBC. This study highlights important situations of high medical need within MBC patients. DATABASE REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT032753.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Deluche
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, 94800, France; Department of Medical Oncology, CHU de Limoges, France
| | - Alison Antoine
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, Lyon, 69008, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Prom. Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, Lyon, 69008, France
| | - Audrey Lardy-Cleaud
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, Lyon, 69008, France
| | - Veronique Dieras
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugéne Marquis, Avenue de La Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, Rennes, 35000, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue D'Ulm, Paris & Saint-Cloud, 75005, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de L'Argonne, Bordeaux, 33000, France
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Du Cancer de Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier, 34298, France
| | - Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 Rue Montalembert, Clermont Ferrand, 63011, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, 13009, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, Toulouse, 31059, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest Nantes & Angers, 15 Rue André Boquel, Angers, 49055, France
| | - Jean Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valambrose, Nice, 06189, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue Du Général Harris, Caen, 14000, France
| | - Veronique Lorgis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, 21079, France
| | - Laurence Vanlemmens
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, Lille, 59000, France
| | - Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugéne Marquis, Avenue de La Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, Rennes, 35000, France
| | | | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, 3 Rue de La Porte de L'Hôpital, Strasbourg, 67000, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54519, France
| | - Christelle Jouannaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, 1 Rue Du Général Koenig, Reims, 51100, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rue D'Amiens, Rouen, 76000, France
| | - Magali Lacroix-Triki
- Department of BioPathology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, 94800, France
| | - Coralie Courtinard
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, Paris, 75654, France
| | - David Perol
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, Lyon, 69008, France
| | - Mathieu Robain
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, Paris, 75654, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, 94800, France.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Annonay M, Abiven M, Brain E, Ung M, Cristol-Dalstein L, Mouret-Reynier MA, Goncalves A, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Francois E, Lefeuvre-Plesse C, Fel JL, Lorgis V, Servent V, Uwer L, Jouannaud C, Leheurteur M, Campion L, Courtinard C, Villacroux O, Petit T, Soubeyran P, Bachelot T, Bellera C, Delaloge S. Abstract P1-19-19: Treatments and outcome in older versus younger women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the multicenter national observational ESME database. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p1-19-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Prognosis of women with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has radically improved over the past 10 years, resulting from the implementation in clinical of anti-HER2 therapies. However, there are limited data regarding these trends in the older women, although they represent a growing segment of the population. Standard strategy being based mostly on combinations of anti-HER2 treatments with chemotherapy, under-treatment may be a specific issue in this population.
Methods: Based on the ESME MBC Data Platform (NCT03275311),a unique national real-life database including individual data from all patients (pts) ≥18 years who initiated a first-line treatment for MBC between 2008 and 2016 in the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers, the main objective of this work was the description of patients’ outcome in women with HER2+ MBC according to age: ≥70 vs <70. Secondary objective included the description of treatment patterns and a multivariate analysis. Outcome was described with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Variables of interest were age (≥70 vs < 70), number of metastatic sites at initial MBC diagnosis (1 vs 2 vs ≥3), visceral disease (Y/N), hormone receptor status (HR+/HR-), de novo MBC (Y/N), type of first-line treatment. We relied on Cox’s proportional hazard (PH) model, with adjustment for non-PH in the presence of time-varying effects; hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval were reported (IC95%).
Results: Of 22463 cases selected, 4045 (18%) women had HER2+ MBC with a 4.4-year median follow-up. Of those, 814 (20%) were aged ≥ 70 and had more often HR+ disease (Table 1). As 1st line treatment, anti-HER2 therapy was prescribed in 76% vs 92% of older vs younger pts, combined with chemotherapy in 65% vs 89%. Median OS and PFS (years) were 2.9 [2.6-3.1] and 0.9 [0.8 - 1.0] vs 4.5 [4.2-4.6] and 1.1 [1.1-1.2] in older vs younger patients. Multivariate analysis for OS identified the following variables as significant: age ≥ 70 (HR=1.57 IC95% [1.40-1.75]), 2 and ≥ 3 metastatic sites (HR=1.24 IC95% [1.10-1.39] and HR=1.92 IC95% [1.70-2.17] respectively), de novo MBC (HR 0.70 IC95% [0.63 - 0.77]), visceral disease with a time-varying effect (HR=2.67 IC95% [2.11-3.39] and 5.98 IC95% [4.64-7.46] at 1 and 5 years) and first-line treatment with a time-varying effect, better prognosis for combination of chemotherapy + anti-HER2 agent + endocrine therapy vs any other. Except for de novo MBC, similar results were observed for PFS.
Conclusions: In this large real-life database, older HER2+ MBC patients received significantly less frequently “standard” first-line anti-HER2 treatment, defined as a combination of chemotherapy and anti-HER2 treatment. Age was a strong risk factor for both PFS and OS. Given the lack of information on geriatric assessment (e.g. general health status, functional status, comorbidity, etc.), confounding factors and usual selection biases cannot be ruled out. These results stress the importance to study older populations with specific approaches, not based on the usual transfer of those developed in younger ones, in order to avoid under and overtreatments, both that are not acceptable.
Table 1: Patients’ characteristics and first-line treatment≥70<70AllP value N814 (20%)3231 (80%)4045 (100%)NAAge at MBC diagnosis (years)median775357NAQ1-Q373-8245-6047-67HR+ (≥10%)Yes560 (69%)2034 (63%)2594 (64%)0.01No247 (30%)1167 (36.1%)1414 (35%)missing7 (1%)30 (1%)37 (1%)De novo MBCYes310 (38%)1310 (41%)1620 (40%)0.20No503 (62%)1915 (59%)2418 (60%)missing1 (0%)6 (0%)7 (0%)Number of metastatic sites1429 (53%)1670 (52%)2099 (52%)0.902211 (36%)834 (26%)1045 (26%)3+170 (21%)696 (21%)866 (21%)missing4 (0%)31 (1%)35 (1%)Visceral diseaseYes510 (63%)2096 (65%)2606 (64%)0.18No300 (37%)1104 (34%)1404 (35%)Missing4 (0%)31 (1%)35 (1%)Chemotherapy + anti-HER2 agent as 1st line treatmentYes529 (65%)2880 (89%)3409 (84%)<0.01No241 (30%)296 (9%)537 (13%)Missing44 (5%)55 (2%)99 (2%)Anti-HER2 agent as 1st line treatmentYes623 (76%)2984 (92%)3607 (89%)<0.01No147 (18%)192 (6%)339 (8%)Missing44 (6%)55 (2%)99 (3%)
Citation Format: Mylène Annonay, Morgane Abiven, Etienne Brain, Mony Ung, Laurence Cristol-Dalstein, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Anthony Goncalves, Sophie Abadie-Lacourtoisie, Eric Francois, Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse, Johann Le Fel, Veronique Lorgis, Veronique Servent, Lionel Uwer, Christelle Jouannaud, Marianne Leheurteur, Loic Campion, Coralie Courtinard, Olivier Villacroux, Thierry Petit, Pierre Soubeyran, Thomas Bachelot, Carine Bellera, Suzette Delaloge. Treatments and outcome in older versus younger women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the multicenter national observational ESME database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Mony Ung
- 3Institut Claudis Regaud IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lionel Uwer
- 13Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | | | | | - Loic Campion
- 7Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes et Angers, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bertho M, Fraisse J, Patsouris A, Cottu P, Delaloge S, Pérol D, Jaffré A, Goncalves A, Lebitasy MP, D'Hondt V, Dalenc F, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Arveux P, Rouzier R, Penault-Llorca F, Uwer L, Eymard JC, Breton M, Chevrot M, Leheurteur M, Velten M, Simon G, Frenel JS. Abstract P2-19-01: Impact of bone-only metastatic breast cancer on outcome in a real-life setting: A comprehensive analysis of 5,041 women from the ESME database. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p2-19-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Bone-only (BO) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), defined as bone as unique site of metastasis at MBC diagnosis, is thought to carry a better prognosis among MBC. However, only small retrospective series and data from selected randomized controlled trials have been reported so far. Based on a national database, we aimed at providing a large comprehensive analysis of BO MBC, and at evaluating its impact on clinical outcome.
Methods: The ESME MBC platform (NCT03275311) is a French multicenter retrospective real-life database using a clinical trial-like methodology to collect data from 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. It includes data from each newly diagnosed MBC patient having initiated at least one treatment between 2008 and 2016. BO cases occurring in women were retrieved and compared to the overall non-BO population, regarding treatment effects and survival.
Results: Of the 22,463 women selected in the database, 5,041 (22.4%) patients with BO disease were identified. Most (N=4,102, 81.4%) had HR+/HER2- disease while 644 (12.8%) and 295 (5.9%) patients had HER2+ or HR-/HER2- disease, respectively. Compared to non-BO MBC, BO MBC patients were older in the global cohort and in HR-/HER2- patients (mean age 61.0y versus 59.5y, and 59.3y vs 56.4y, all p<0.0001, respectively), and tumor histology was more frequently a lobular carcinoma in the global cohort, in HR+/HER2- and in HR-/HER2- patients (18.6% vs 10.8%, 20.6% vs 15.2%, 13.8% vs 3.2%, all p<0.0001, respectively). In addition, metastatic disease occurred de novo more frequently in BO MBC patients (37.9% versus 29.2%) (p<0.0001), and a statistically significant difference was also observed within each tumor subtype group. The management of bone disease included bisphosphonates or denosumab, radiotherapy, and invasive bone metastasis procedures in 3,913 (77.6%), 2,929 (58.1%), and 1,154 (22.9%) patients, respectively. Median follow up was 52.4 months (95% CI [50.8-54.2]) in BO population and 50.9 months (95% CI [49.7-51.8]) in non-BO population. BO MBC patients had improved median progression-free survival (PFS) 1, regarding first-line treatment, and overall survival (OS) compared to non-BO MBC, globally and within each tumor subtype group (Table). Indeed, 5-year OS rates reached up to 43%, 54% and 16% in HR+/HER2-, HER2+ and HR-/HER2- BO MBC groups, respectively. This suggests that a substantial number of these patients could be considered as long survivors. In the BO MBC cohort, de novo BO MBC patients had a higher 5-year OS rate than relapsed BO MBC patients. BO disease was an independent prognostic factor of OS (hazard ratio 0.68 (95% CI [0.65-0.72]), p<0.0001) together with age, tumor subtype, grade, adjuvant treatment and metastatic-free interval.
Conclusion: This large comprehensive study is the largest cohort of BO MBC to date. BO MBC has a distinct presentation from non-BO MBC and carry a better prognosis compared to non-BO MBC. A significant proportion of BO MBC patients have a very long survival and may benefit from aggressive local therapy, as stereotactic radiotherapy. Dedicated studies are warranted to tailor the management of these patients.
Funding: This work was supported by UNICANCER. The ESME MBC database is supported by an industrial consortium (Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, MSD, Eisai and Daiichi Sankyo). Data collection, analyses and publications are totally managed by R&D UNICANCER independently of the industrial consortium.
TableBOBOBOBOnon-BOnon-BOnon-BOnon-BON (%)median OS monthsmedian PFS1 months5-year OS rate %N (%)median OS monthsmedian PFS1 months5-year OS rate %(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)Overall population5,041 (100%)52.1 (50.3-54.1) 13.1 (12.6-13.8) 43.41 (41.66-45.15)15,054 (100%)34.7 (34.0-35.6) 8.5 (8.3-8.7) 30.55 (29.62-31.48)HR+/HER-4,102 (81.4%)52.6 (50.5-54.8)13.6 (13.0-14.3)43.52 (41.56-45.46)9,127 (60.6%) 39.0 (37.8-40.1)9.6 (9.3-9.9)32.69 (31.47-33.93)HER2+644 (12.8%)66.4 (59.8-71.9) 14.9 (12.9-17.3) 54.49 (49.54-59.16)3,265 (21.7%) 46.5 (44.2-48.9)10.6 (10.1-11.3)39.88 (37.77-41.98)HR-/HER2-295 (5.9%)20.8 (18.3-27.4) 5.6 (4.9-7.5)16.21 (11.21-22.02)2,662 (17.7%) 14.3 (13.6-15.1)4.8 (4.6-5.0)10.89 (9.4-12.5)De novo MBC patients1,909 (37.9%)58.6 (55.4-62.1)17.9 (17.0-18.9)48.24 (45.28-51.14)4,399 (29.2%) ---Relapsed MBC patients3,132 (62.1%)48.3 (46.5-50.5)10.7 (10.2-11.2)40.51 (38.34-42.67)10,655 (70.8%)---
Citation Format: Marion Bertho, Julien Fraisse, Anne Patsouris, Paul Cottu, Suzette Delaloge, David Pérol, Anne Jaffré, Anthony Goncalves, Marie-Paule Lebitasy, Véronique D'Hondt, Florence Dalenc, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Christelle Levy, Patrick Arveux, Roman Rouzier, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, Lionel Uwer, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Mathias Breton, Michaël Chevrot, Marianne Leheurteur, Michel Velten, Gaëtane Simon, Jean-Sébastien Frenel. Impact of bone-only metastatic breast cancer on outcome in a real-life setting: A comprehensive analysis of 5,041 women from the ESME database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-19-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Bertho
- 1Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l’Ouest – Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Julien Fraisse
- 2Biometrics Unit, Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Anne Patsouris
- 1Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l’Ouest – Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- 3Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- 4Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Pérol
- 5Biostatistic Unit, Clinical Research and Innovation Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Anne Jaffré
- 6Department of Medical Information, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- 7Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Véronique D'Hondt
- 9Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- 10Department of Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- 11Department of Oncology, Institut Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- 12Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Patrick Arveux
- 13Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Roman Rouzier
- 14Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | - Lionel Uwer
- 16Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - Mathias Breton
- 18Medical Information Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Michel Velten
- 21Clinical Research and Epidemiology Department, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Jean-Sébastien Frenel
- 22Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l’Ouest – René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Clatot F, Fontanilles M, Lefebvre L, Lequesne J, Veyret C, Alexandru C, Leheurteur M, Guillemet C, Gouérant S, Petrau C, Théry JC, Rigal O, Moldovan C, Tennevet I, Rastelli O, Poullain A, Savary L, Bubenheim M, Georgescu D, Gouérant J, Gilles-Baray M, Di Fiore F. Randomised phase II trial evaluating the safety of peripherally inserted catheters versus implanted port catheters during adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2020; 126:116-124. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
37
|
Penault-Llorca F, Kwiatkowski F, Arnaud A, Levy C, Leheurteur M, Uwer L, Derbel O, Le Rol A, Jacquin JP, Jouannaud C, Quenel-Tueux N, Girre V, Foa C, Guardiola E, Lortholary A, Catala S, Guiu S, Valent A, Boinon D, Lemonnier J, Delaloge S. Decision of adjuvant chemotherapy in intermediate risk luminal breast cancer patients: A prospective multicenter trial assessing the clinical and psychological impact of EndoPredict® (EpClin) use (UCBG 2-14). Breast 2019; 49:132-140. [PMID: 31790959 PMCID: PMC7375561 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Revised: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Genomic tests can identify ER-positive HER2-negative localized breast cancer patients who may not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Such tests seem especially interesting in “intermediate” clinico-pathological risk categories. The psychological impact of the decision uncertainty in these women remains largely unexplored. We assessed the clinical and psychological impact of EndoPredict® (EpClin), a clinico-genomic test, in these patients. Methods This multicenter, single arm prospective study (NCT02773004) enrolled patients for which adjuvant chemotherapy was uncertain, based on predefined criteria. The primary endpoint was the proportion of change between initial adjuvant decision and final administration of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included post-test (Day 17) and 1-year patient reported outcomes. Results One third of 200 evaluable patients had a high EpClin score (≥3.32867; 10 years cumulative risk of distance failure ≥10%). The overall change rate of chemotherapy decision was 72/200 (35.8%, 95% CI 29.2–42.4). Chemotherapy was withdrawn in 57 cases (28.4% [22.2–34.8]) and added in 15 (7.5% [3.8–11.2]. 6 changes (8%) were based on patients’ decisions. Anxiety and distress levels increased at Day 17 when adding chemotherapy after the test result (p < 10−7 and 0.00022 respectively), while stable in other situations. At 1-year, all patients had returned to the baseline anxiety and distress levels (mean anxiety 51.5, +/− SD = 2.5 [max. 80], mean distress 3±1 [max. 10]). Conclusions EndoPredict ® (EpClin) is clinically useful in deciding whether or not to administer adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with intermediate risk. A single-step decision is preferable since adding chemotherapy at a later stage increases anxiety and distress. EndoPredict ® (EpClin) allowed a chemotherapy decision modification in 35% of the patients included in the Adendom trial. Patient-physician concertation is important: 8% of treatment changes are based on patients’ will. A single-step decision including the test appears preferable to limit anxiety and distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédérique Penault-Llorca
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre Jean Perrin, Department of Biology and Pathology, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Fabrice Kwiatkowski
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre Jean Perrin, Department of Biostatistics, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Antoine Arnaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | - Olfa Derbel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Annick Le Rol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Quimper, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Jacquin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Newirth, Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | | | | | - Véronique Girre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Départemental de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - Cyril Foa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France
| | - Emmanuel Guardiola
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de La Dracénie, Draguignan, France
| | - Alain Lortholary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France
| | - Stéphanie Catala
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Catalan D'oncologie, Perpignan, France
| | - Séverine Guiu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Régional Du Cancer Montpellier (ICM), Val D'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Diane Boinon
- Department of Supportive Care, Psycho-oncology Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Darlix A, Louvel G, Fraisse J, Jacot W, Brain E, Debled M, Mouret-Reynier MA, Goncalves A, Dalenc F, Delaloge S, Campone M, Augereau P, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Fumet JD, Lecouillard I, Cottu P, Petit T, Uwer L, Jouannaud C, Leheurteur M, Dieras V, Robain M, Chevrot M, Pasquier D, Bachelot T. Impact of breast cancer molecular subtypes on the incidence, kinetics and prognosis of central nervous system metastases in a large multicentre real-life cohort. Br J Cancer 2019; 121:991-1000. [PMID: 31719684 PMCID: PMC6964671 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0619-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) behaviour differs depending on hormone receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) statuses. METHODS The kinetics of central nervous system (CNS) metastases (CNS metastasis-free survival, CNSM-FS) and subsequent patient's prognosis (overall survival, OS) according to the molecular subtype were retrospectively assessed in 16703 MBC patients of the ESME nationwide multicentre MBC database (Kaplan-Meier method). RESULTS CNS metastases occurred in 4118 patients (24.6%) (7.2% at MBC diagnosis and 17.5% later during follow-up). Tumours were HER2-/HR+ (45.3%), HER2+/HR+ (14.5%), HER2+/HR- (14.9%) and triple negative (25.4%). Median age at CNS metastasis diagnosis was 58.1 years (range: 22.8-92.0). The median CNSM-FS was 10.8 months (95% CI: 16.5-17.9) among patients who developed CNS metastases. Molecular subtype was independently associated with CNSM-FS (HR = 3.45, 95% CI: 3.18-3.75, triple-negative and HER2-/HR+ tumours). After a 30-month follow-up, median OS after CNS metastasis diagnosis was 7.9 months (95% CI: 7.2-8.4). OS was independently associated with subtypes: median OS was 18.9 months (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50-0.64) for HER2+/HR+ , 13.1 months (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.65-0.81) for HER2+/HR-, 4.4 months (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.42-1.69) for triple-negative and 7.1 months for HER2-/HR+ patients (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Tumour molecular subtypes strongly impact incidence, kinetics and prognosis of CNS metastases in MBC patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03275311.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France.
| | - Guillaume Louvel
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Julien Fraisse
- Biometrics Unit, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France.,Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63011, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard-Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Mario Campone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Centre René Gauducheau, Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44805, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Paule Augereau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, 15 rue André Boquel, 49055, Angers, France
| | - Jean Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de valambrose, 06189, Nice, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Jean-David Fumet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue Professeur Marion, 21079, Dijon, France
| | - Isabelle Lecouillard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, 3 Rue de la Porte de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Christelle Jouannaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, 1 Rue du Général Koenig, 51100, Reims, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rue d'Amiens, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Véronique Dieras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Mathieu Robain
- Department of Research and Development, Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Michaël Chevrot
- Department of Research and Development, Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gougis P, Carton M, Tchokothe C, Campone M, Dalenc F, Mailliez A, Levy C, Jacot W, Debled M, Leheurteur M, Bachelot T, Hennequin A, Perrin C, Gonçalves A, Uwer L, Eymard JC, Petit T, Mouret-Reynier MA, Chamorey E, Simon G, Saghatchian M, Cailliot C, Le Tourneau C. CinéBreast-factors influencing the time to first metastatic recurrence in breast cancer: Analysis of real-life data from the French ESME MBC database. Breast 2019; 49:17-24. [PMID: 31675683 PMCID: PMC7375625 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The Time to First Metastatic Recurrence (TFMR) could be considered as an indirect reflection of the tumour growth kinetics which plays an important role in cancer. Molecular subtypes such as expression of estrogen receptor are known predictive factors of TFMR. The CinéBreast study aimed to identify predictive factors of the time to TFMR. Methods The French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Database (NCT03275311) was used, which contains data from a cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients from 2008 to 2016 using retrospective data collection. It is a national multi-centre database. The impact of TFMR on overall survival (OS) since first metastasis was also evaluated. Results Among 16 702 patients recorded in the ESME MBC database, 10 595 had an initially localised breast cancer with hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status available, with a metastatic recurrence. Median follow up was 56 months. Median TFMR was 59 months (<24: 20%, 24–60: 31%, 60–120: 25%, >120: 24%). HER2+ and TNBC were respectively 4 times and 12 times (p < 0.0001) more likely to have a recurrence within 2 years when compared to the luminal subgroup. Short TFMR and HR-/HER2-subtype significantly correlated with a poor OS in multivariate analysis. Some patients with MBC (20% in HER2+, 10% in ER+/HER2-and <5% in the ER-/HER2-) were long-term survivors in all 3 subgroups. Conclusions In this large-scale real-life data study, patients with a TNBC metastatic recurrence had a shorter TFMR. Short TFMR significantly correlated with worse overall survival. ESME is a large-scale real-life database of 16 702 metastatic breast cancer patients. A short time to first metastatic recurrence is associated with poor overall survival. Triple-negative tumours were more likely to recur early than HR+ and HER2+ tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Gougis
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, Saint-Cloud, France; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre D'Investigation Clinique Paris-Est, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, PSL University, CLIP² Galilée, Paris, France
| | - M Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - C Tchokothe
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - M Campone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Nantes and Angers, France
| | - F Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - A Mailliez
- Department of Breast Cancer, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - C Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - W Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - M Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - A Hennequin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - C Perrin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - A Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - L Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - J C Eymard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Godinot, Reims, France
| | - T Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - M A Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - E Chamorey
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - G Simon
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - M Saghatchian
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - C Cailliot
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - C Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, Saint-Cloud, France; U900 INSERM Research Unit, Saint-Cloud, France.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Clatot F, Fontanilles M, Lefebvre L, Lequesne J, Veyret C, Alexandru C, Leheurteur M, Guillemet C, Gouérant S, Petrau C, Thery JC, Rigal O, Moldovan C, Tennevet Bouilly I, Rastelli O, Bubenheim M, Georgescu D, Gouérant J, Gilles-Baray M, Di Fiore F. Randomized phase II trial evaluating the safety of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters during adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz265.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
41
|
Haviari S, Blanchet B, Colomban O, Venat-Bouvet L, Dohollou N, Floquet A, Louvet C, Lotz JP, Lacourtoisie SA, Favier L, Fabbro M, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Kurtz J, Follana P, Leheurteur M, Del Piano F, Alliot C, Alexandre J, You B, Tod M. Post-hoc analysis of the nintedanib exposure-response relationships in the CHIVA trial in advanced ovarian cancer: A GINECO study. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz250.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
42
|
Le Saux O, Lardy-Cleaud A, Frank S, Debled M, Cottu PH, Pistilli B, Vanlemmens L, Leheurteur M, Lévy C, Laborde L, Uwer L, D'hondt V, Berchery D, Lorgis V, Ferrero JM, Perrocheau G, Courtinard C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Velten M, Breton M, Parent D, Chabaud S, Robain M, Bachelot T. Assessment of the efficacy of successive endocrine therapies in hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-life multicentre national study. Eur J Cancer 2019; 118:131-141. [PMID: 31330488 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For luminal metastatic breast cancer (MBC), endocrine therapy (ET) is the recommended initial treatment before chemotherapy. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of multiple ET lines in a real-life study. METHODS The Breast Cancer Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) project analysed data from all patients with systemic treatment for MBC initiated between 2008 and 2014 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. The primary end-point was the successive progression-free survival (PFS) evaluation. RESULTS The ESME research programme included 9921 patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (HER2-) MBC. Before any chemotherapy, 4195 (43.4%), 1252 (29.8%) and 279 (6.6%) patients received one, two or three ET ± targeted therapy, respectively. The median PFS for first-, second- and third-line ET ± targeted therapy was 11.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8-12.1), 5.8 (95% CI, 5.3-6.1) and 5.5 (95% CI, 4.6-6.3) months, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, time from diagnosis to metastatic recurrence (P < 0.0001), presence of symptoms at metastatic relapse (P = 0.01), number of metastatic sites (P = 0.0003) and their localisation (P < 0.0001) were prognostic factors for PFS1. Duration of previous PFS was the only prognostic factor for subsequent PFS (10% threshold). Ten percent of the patients showed long-term response to ET, with a total treatment duration before chemotherapy ≥43.6 months. CONCLUSIONS Median PFS in our HR+/HER2- real-life cohort is similar to median first-line PFS reported in clinical trials, regardless of ET used as second- and third-line treatment. Despite the international consensus on early initiation of ET, the latter is not prescribed in most of the cases. Patients with a low tumour burden may achieve prolonged response on ET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Le Saux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Centre, Lyon, France.
| | | | - Sophie Frank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Curie Institute, Paris, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paul H Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Curie Institute, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Christelle Lévy
- Cancers & Preventions, François Baclesse Centre, Caen, France
| | - Lilian Laborde
- Data Management and Analysis Center, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexis-Vautrin Cancer Institute of Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Veronique D'hondt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montpellier Regional Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Delphine Berchery
- Department of Medical Information, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse, France
| | - Veronique Lorgis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges-François-Leclerc Centre, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice, France
| | | | | | | | - Michel Velten
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Mathias Breton
- Medical Information Department, Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Damien Parent
- Department of Pharmacy, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France
| | - Sylvie Chabaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Centre, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Robain
- Department of Research and Development, R&D Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Centre, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lambertini M, Olympios N, Lequesne J, Calbrix C, Fontanilles M, Loeb A, Leheurteur M, Demeestere I, Di Fiore F, Perdrix A, Clatot F. Impact of Taxanes, Endocrine Therapy, and Deleterious Germline BRCA Mutations on Anti-müllerian Hormone Levels in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Anthracycline- and Cyclophosphamide-Based Chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2019; 9:575. [PMID: 31355134 PMCID: PMC6640206 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Limited evidence exists on the impact of adding a taxane, using endocrine therapy and carrying a deleterious germline BRCA mutation on ovarian reserve measured by anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels of young breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant cyclophosphamide- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Methods: This is a biomarker analysis including young (≤ 40 years) early breast cancer patients with known germline BRCA mutational status and available prospectively collected frozen plasma samples before and after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of either six cycles of FEC (5 fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel (D, 100 mg/m2). Endocrine therapy consisted of tamoxifen (±GnRH agonists). AMH levels at baseline, 1 and 3 years after diagnosis were compared according to type of chemotherapy (FEC only vs. FEC-D), use of endocrine therapy (yes vs. no) and deleterious germline BRCA mutations (mutated vs. negative). Results: Out of 148 included patients, 127 (86%) received D following FEC chemotherapy, 90 (61%) underwent endocrine therapy, and 35 (24%) had deleterious germline BRCA mutations. In the whole cohort, AMH levels drastically dropped 1 year after diagnosis (p < 0.0001) with a slight but significant recovery at 3 years (p < 0.0001). One year after diagnosis, patients treated with FEC only had higher median AMH levels than those who received FEC-D (0.22 vs. 0.04 μg/L, p = 0.0006); no difference was observed at 3 years (0.06 and 0.18 μg/L, p = 0.47). Patients under endocrine therapy had significantly higher AMH levels than those who did not receive this treatment 1 year after diagnosis (0.12 vs. 0.02 μg/L; p = 0.008), with no difference at 3 years (0.11 and 0.20 μg/L, p = 0.22). AMH levels were similar between BRCA-mutated and BRCA-negative patients at baseline (1.94 vs. 1.66 μg/L, p = 0.53), 1 year (0.09 vs. 0.06 μg/L, p = 0.39) and 3 years (0.25 vs. 0.16 μg/L; p = 0.43) after diagnosis. Conclusions: In breast cancer patients receiving FEC chemotherapy, adding D appeared to negatively impact on their ovarian reserve in the short-term; no further detrimental effect was observed for endocrine therapy use and presence of a deleterious germline BRCA mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Nathalie Olympios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Justine Lequesne
- Department of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Céline Calbrix
- Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Maxime Fontanilles
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.,IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Agnès Loeb
- Department of Medical Information, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France
| | | | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Di Fiore
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.,IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Anne Perdrix
- Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.,IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.,IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jacot W, Heudel PE, Fraisse J, Gourgou S, Guiu S, Dalenc F, Pistilli B, Campone M, Levy C, Debled M, Leheurteur M, Chaix M, Lefeuvre C, Goncalves A, Uwer L, Ferrero JM, Eymard JC, Petit T, Mouret-Reynier MA, Courtinard C, Cottu P, Robain M, Mailliez A. Real-life activity of eribulin mesylate among metastatic breast cancer patients in the multicenter national observational ESME program. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:3359-3369. [PMID: 31087564 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Eribulin mesylate (EM) was recently approved for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) chemotherapy (CT) in late lines by the FDA, with debated results in second line. We evaluated outcomes in breast cancer patients receiving EM as second, third and fourth line in a national real-life cohort of 16,703 consecutive MBC patients initiating their first metastatic therapeutic line between 2008 and 2014. Primary and secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). An imbalance was seen for HER2+ tumors and concomitant anti-HER2 targeted therapies use, we thus performed a subanalysis in HER2- patients. PFS and OS were significantly better in EM patients in third and fourth lines, compared to "Other chemotherapies" patients (PFS: 4.14 vs. 3.02 months, p = 0.0010; 3.61 vs. 2.53 months, p = 0.0102, third and fourth-line; OS: 11.27 vs. 7.65 months, p = 0.0001; 10.91 vs. 5.95 months, p < 0.0001, third and fourth-line). No significant difference was reported in second-line (PFS: 5.06 vs. 4.14 months, p = 0.1171; OS: 13.99 vs. 11.66 months, p = 0.151). Among HER2- patients, a significant difference was seen for all lines, including 2nd-line (PFS: 4.57 vs. 3.91 months, p = 0.0379; OS: 14.98 vs. 10.51 months, p = 0.0113). In this large real-world database, HER2-negative MBC patients receiving EM in second or later CT line presented significantly better PFS and OS. This difference disappeared in second line in the overall population, probably because of the imbalance in HER2-targeted treatments use. Our results mirror those of the published randomized trials. The effect of anti-HER2 therapies addition in this setting still needs to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Jacot
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM) Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.,IRCM INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Julien Fraisse
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM) Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Gourgou
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM) Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Séverine Guiu
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM) Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.,IRCM INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Mario Campone
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | | | | | - Marie Chaix
- Centre Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Lionel Uwer
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Paul Cottu
- Etablissement Hospitalier Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Augusto L, Beaussire L, Lequesne J, Perdrix A, Sefrioui D, Fontanilles M, Leheurteur M, Di Fiore F, Sarafan-Vasseur N, Clatot F. Prognostic values of cell free DNA, CA 15.3, and ESR1 circulating mutations variations in hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients under aromatase inhibitor (AI). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e12534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e12534 Background: Circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA), CA 15.3 and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have been associated with survival in MBC. These 3 biomarkers have never been compared. Methods: We retrospectively included all patients treated in our center between 2010 and 2012 for a HR+ MBC, who had clinical progression during the first line of aromatase inhibitor (AI) and available plasma samples. CfDNA level (ng/mL), CA 15.3 level (U/mL) and ESR1 circulating mutation level (Y537N, Y537S, Y537C and D538G, identified by ddPCR) were determined at time of clinical progression (Tp) and 3 months before (Tp-3). Biomarkers values at Tp and Tp-3 as well as their variations were analyzed according to clinical progression and overall survival (OS). Results: 91 patients were analyzed. CA 15.3 was elevated ( > 30 U/mL) in 71/91 (78%) at Tp and 62/91 (68%) at Tp-3. Higher CA 15.3 was associated with worse OS, especially at Tp (HR = 1.0006/unit at both times, p = 0.009 at Tp; p = 0.08 at Tp-3). Higher cfDNA was associated with worse OS, both at Tp and Tp-3 (HR = 1.006/unit, p < 0.0001 and HR = 1.007/unit, p = 0.02, respectively). An ESR1 mutation was detected in 14/91 at Tp-3 (15%) and 28/91 at Tp (31%). ESR1 mutation detection was strongly correlated with OS both at Tp and Tp-3 (HR = 2.4, p = 0.0005 and HR = 1.97, p = 0.03, respectively). Between Tp-3 and Tp, overall median CA 15.3 and ESR1 mutation level increased (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.007, respectively) and were related to poorer OS (HR = 1.007/unit, p = 0.0002 and HR = 3.1, p = 0.05). In contrast, CfDNA was not correlated at all with clinical progression (36/91 increase, 36/91 decrease, and 19/91 stable cfDNA). ROC curve analysis identified a 59% CA 15.3 increase as the best cut-off for predicting progression, but with poor performance (AUC = 0.64). Multivariate analysis showed that CA 15.3 at Tp (HR = 1.0006/unit, p = 0.006), cfDNA at Tp (HR = 1.005/unit, p = 0.01), ESR1 detection at Tp (HR = 2.7, p = 0.0002) and CA 15.3 increase between Tp-3 and Tp (HR = 1.006/unit, p = 0.003) were associated with poor OS. Conclusions: All 3 biomarkers are correlated with OS in MBC treated with AI. CfDNA variation is poorly related to clinical progression while CA 15.3 variation or ESR1 mutation detection are much more reliable. Overall the better performance is observed with ESR1 mutation detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laetitia Augusto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Ludivine Beaussire
- Institute of Research Onco-Normand (IRON), Rouen University Hospital and Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | | | - Anne Perdrix
- Department of Bio-Pathology, IRON Group, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - David Sefrioui
- Digestive Oncology Unit, Iron Group, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | | | | | - Frédéric Di Fiore
- Digestive Oncology Unit, IRON group, Rouen Hospital, University of Normandy, Rouen, France
| | | | - Florian Clatot
- INSERM U1245, IRON Group, Centre Henri Becquerel, University Hospital, University of Normandy, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Robelin P, Tod M, Colomban O, Louvet C, Lotz JP, Abadie Lacourtoisie S, Fabbro M, Desauw C, Bonichon N, Kurtz JE, Follana P, Leheurteur M, Del Piano F, Alliot CR, De Rauglaudre G, Ray-Coquard IL, Combe P, Chevalier A, Joly F, You B. Modeled CA-125 kinetics during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for predicting the likelihood of optimal interval debulking surgery in ovarian cancer patients: Data from CHIVA trial (a GINECO study). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.5546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5546 Background: A pre-operative predictive biomarker of CC0 interval debulking surgery (IDS) likelihood would be helpful. The modeled CA125 elimination rate constant KELIM predicts OS in 1st line setting (You et al. Clin Cancer Res 2019). The predictive/prognostic values of KELIM regarding CC scores at IDS, and survivals, during neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were assessed. Methods: The data of the CHIVA randomized phase II trial, comparing carboplatin-paclitaxel +/- nintedanib before IDS (NCT01583322), were used. A semi-mechanistic model was built to describe CA125 longitudinal kinetics during the first 100 treatment days. The relationships between KELIM and IDS CC scores, PFS & OS, were assessed with other major prognostic factors (grade, histology, GCIG CA125 response, FIGO stage, and arm) using multivariate logistic regression (logit), C-index & survival tests. Results: The longitudinal kinetics of 529 CA125 values, assessed every 3 weeks during neo-adj chemotherapy, were modeled in 133 patients (out of 188). KELIM (as a continuous covariate) was the only significant predictive factor of CC0 IDS likelihood using multivariate analyses (OR = 12.37, 95% CI [4.32-39.67]). CC0 IDS probability can be estimated with patient KELIM: ≥ 90 % if standardized KELIM ≥ 0.12. Non-parametric survival models confirmed the independent predictive values of KELIM categorized by terciles regarding PFS & OS (Table). The parametric model linking KELIM (as a continuous covariate) with OS allows to predict the patient survivals (months) based on their estimated KELIM (HR = 0.20, [0.10-0.39]). Conclusions: The prognostic & predictive values of the modeled CA125 KELIM are also confirmed regarding CC0 IDS likelihood, PFS and OS with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient KELIM is calculable online, based on observed CA125 values, on http://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/ . Clinical trial information: 2011-006288-23. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michel Tod
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Colomban
- Laboratoire EMR3738 Ciblage Thérapeutique en Oncologie, Oullins, France
| | | | - Jean-Pierre Lotz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Tenon (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Philippe Follana
- GINECO and Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Pierre Combe
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | | | - Florence Joly
- GINECO and Regional Centre Control Against Cancer Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Benoit You
- Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, EMR UCBL/HCL 3738, Lyon, GINECO & GINEGEPS, France, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Monneur A, Bertucci F, Lardy-Cleaud A, Augereau P, Debled M, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Coudert B, Mailliez A, Bachelot T, Ferrero JM, Guiu S, Uwer L, Campone M, Cottu P, Jouannaud C, De la Motte Rouge T, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Pistilli B, Dalenc F, Simon G, Robain M, Viens P, Lerebours F, Gonçalves A. Abstract P5-17-04: Metastatic inflammatory breast cancer: Clinical features and outcomes in the national, multicentric, real-life ESME cohort. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p5-17-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:Primary inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive form of breast cancer. Survival of IBC patients has been improved by multimodal therapy. However 5-year overall survival (OS) still remains close to 50-60%, due to high risk of disseminated disease. Given the low incidence, prognosis of metastatic cases stages is poorly described.
Methods:This study aimed to describe OS of IBC (T4d AJCC TNM classification) with upfront or recurrent metastatic disease compared with non-IBC patients in the ESME database (N=16,702 patients). OS was calculated from the diagnosis of metastasis to the date of death (from any cause), or censored to date of latest news. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS).
Results:From 2008 to 2014, 7,465 patients with diagnosis of MBC and known clinical status of their primary tumor (T) were identified, including 582 IBC (T4d) and 6,883 non-IBC. As expected, metastatic IBC was associated with pejorative features compared to non-IBC, with less hormonal receptors-positive tumors (44% vs 65.6%), more HER2-positive (30% vs 18.6%) or triple-negative (25.9% vs 15.8%) cases (p<0.001), more frequent upfront M1 stage (53.3% vs 27.7%; p<0.001), and shorter median disease-free interval (2.02 years vs. 4.9 years; p<0.001). With a median follow-up of 50.2 months (0-104), median OS was 28.4 [95%CI 24-33.8] versus 37.2 months [95%CI 36.1-38.5] in metastatic IBC and non-IBC cases respectively (p<0.0001, log-rank test). By multivariate Cox model with adjustment for major prognostic factors [including age, disease-free interval, type of relapse, visceral metastases, molecular subtype, grade], OS was significantly shorter in the metastatic IBC group compared with non-IBC group (HR 1.25 [95%CI 1.1-1.4], p=0.0002). Of note, survival of metastatic IBC patients improved over the last years: median OS 24 months [95%CI 20-31.9], 29 months [95%CI 21.7-39.9] and 36 months [95%CI 27.9-NE] if diagnosed before 2011, between 2011 and 2012, or after 2012 respectively (p=0.003). Such improvement was not observed in non-IBC patients. IBC was associated with shorter median PFS under first line systemic treatment compared with non-IBC (7.2 months [95%CI 6.6-8.3] vs 9.5 months [95%CI 9.1-9.8] respectively, p=0.0136). This was maintained in a multivariate Cox model adjusting for same factors as for OS (HR 1.15 [95%CI 1-1.3], p=0.0050).
Compared with non-IBC, synchronous metastatic IBC showed worse median OS and PFS (39.9 months [95%CI 34.2-45.3] vs 48.4 months [95%CI 46.3-50.8], p=0.0035; 10 months [95%CI 8.8-12.7] vs 14.5 months [95%CI 13.6-15.7], p=0.0027, respectively. Similar results were obtained in metachronous metastatic cases (20.01 months [95%CI 17.1-21.2] vs 32.8 months [95%CI 31.5-34.3], p<0.0001; 5.1 months [95%CI 4.1-6] vs 7.9 months [95%CI 7.6-8.3], p<0.0001, respectively).
Conclusion:In this large national and multicentric study, IBC is a major and independent factor associated with adverse outcome in metastatic setting. Of note, the independent adverse impact on PFS identified in this study may suggest a lower sensitivity of metastatic IBC to available therapeutics. However, results seem to improve in the last years. Detailed analysis according to phenotype will be available.
Citation Format: Monneur A, Bertucci F, Lardy-Cleaud A, Augereau P, Debled M, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Coudert B, Mailliez A, Bachelot T, Ferrero J-M, Guiu S, Uwer L, Campone M, Cottu P, Jouannaud C, De la Motte Rouge T, Leheurteur M, Petit T, Pistilli B, Dalenc F, Simon G, Robain M, Viens P, Lerebours F, Gonçalves A. Metastatic inflammatory breast cancer: Clinical features and outcomes in the national, multicentric, real-life ESME cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-17-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Monneur
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - F Bertucci
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - A Lardy-Cleaud
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - P Augereau
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - M Debled
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - C Levy
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - MA Mouret-Reynier
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - B Coudert
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - A Mailliez
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - T Bachelot
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - J-M Ferrero
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - S Guiu
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - L Uwer
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - M Campone
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - P Cottu
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - C Jouannaud
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - T De la Motte Rouge
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - M Leheurteur
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - T Petit
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - B Pistilli
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - F Dalenc
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - G Simon
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - M Robain
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - P Viens
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - F Lerebours
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| | - A Gonçalves
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Centre Léon Bérard - Biometrics Unit, Lyon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St-Herblain, France; Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France; Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud – IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Unicancer, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lambertini M, Olympios N, Lequesne J, Calbrix C, Fontanilles M, Loeb A, Leheurteur M, Demeestere I, Di Fiore F, Perdrix A, Clatot F. Impact of Taxanes, Endocrine Therapy, and Deleterious Germline BRCA Mutations on Anti-müllerian Hormone Levels in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Anthracycline- and Cyclophosphamide-Based Chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2019. [PMID: 31355134 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00575/full] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Limited evidence exists on the impact of adding a taxane, using endocrine therapy and carrying a deleterious germline BRCA mutation on ovarian reserve measured by anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels of young breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant cyclophosphamide- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Methods: This is a biomarker analysis including young (≤ 40 years) early breast cancer patients with known germline BRCA mutational status and available prospectively collected frozen plasma samples before and after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of either six cycles of FEC (5 fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel (D, 100 mg/m2). Endocrine therapy consisted of tamoxifen (±GnRH agonists). AMH levels at baseline, 1 and 3 years after diagnosis were compared according to type of chemotherapy (FEC only vs. FEC-D), use of endocrine therapy (yes vs. no) and deleterious germline BRCA mutations (mutated vs. negative). Results: Out of 148 included patients, 127 (86%) received D following FEC chemotherapy, 90 (61%) underwent endocrine therapy, and 35 (24%) had deleterious germline BRCA mutations. In the whole cohort, AMH levels drastically dropped 1 year after diagnosis (p < 0.0001) with a slight but significant recovery at 3 years (p < 0.0001). One year after diagnosis, patients treated with FEC only had higher median AMH levels than those who received FEC-D (0.22 vs. 0.04 μg/L, p = 0.0006); no difference was observed at 3 years (0.06 and 0.18 μg/L, p = 0.47). Patients under endocrine therapy had significantly higher AMH levels than those who did not receive this treatment 1 year after diagnosis (0.12 vs. 0.02 μg/L; p = 0.008), with no difference at 3 years (0.11 and 0.20 μg/L, p = 0.22). AMH levels were similar between BRCA-mutated and BRCA-negative patients at baseline (1.94 vs. 1.66 μg/L, p = 0.53), 1 year (0.09 vs. 0.06 μg/L, p = 0.39) and 3 years (0.25 vs. 0.16 μg/L; p = 0.43) after diagnosis. Conclusions: In breast cancer patients receiving FEC chemotherapy, adding D appeared to negatively impact on their ovarian reserve in the short-term; no further detrimental effect was observed for endocrine therapy use and presence of a deleterious germline BRCA mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Nathalie Olympios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Justine Lequesne
- Department of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Céline Calbrix
- Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Maxime Fontanilles
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
- IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Agnès Loeb
- Department of Medical Information, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France
| | | | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Di Fiore
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
- IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Anne Perdrix
- Department of Bio-Pathology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
- IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
- IRON Group, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cabel L, Carton M, Cheaib B, Pierga JY, Dalenc F, Mailliez A, Levy C, Jacot W, Debled M, Leheurteur M, Desmoulins I, Lefeuvre C, Gonçalves A, Uwer L, Ferrero JM, Eymard JC, Petit T, Mouret-Reynier MA, Perrocheau G, Piot I, Pérol D, Simon G, Lerebours F. Oral etoposide in heavily pre-treated metastatic breast cancer: results from the ESME cohort and comparison with other chemotherapy regimens. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 173:397-406. [PMID: 30357526 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5017-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a common setting in which chemotherapy could be effective even in later lines of treatment. Oral etoposide has demonstrated clinical activity in this setting in small-scale studies, but its efficacy has not been compared to that of other chemotherapy regimens. METHODS We used the ESME database (Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics), a real-life national French multicentre cohort of MBC patients initiating therapy between 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. HER2-negative MBC patients who received oral etoposide as > 3rd chemotherapy line and for more than 14 days were included. Primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), and propensity-score matched Cox models including comparison with other therapies in the same setting. RESULTS Three hundred forty-five out of 16,702 patients received oral etoposide and 222 were eligible. Median PFS was 3.2 months [95% CI 2.8-4] and median OS 7.3 months [95% CI 5.7-10.3]. Median PFS did not significantly differ according to the therapeutic line. The only prognostic factor for both PFS and OS was the MBC phenotype (hormone receptor-positive versus triple-negative, HR = 0.71 [95% CI 0.52-0.97], p = 0.028 for PFS and HR = 0.65 [0.46-0.92], p = 0.014 for OS). After matching for the propensity score, no differential effect on PFS or OS was observed between oral etoposide and other chemotherapy regimens administered in the same setting (HR = 0.94 [95% CI 0.77-1.15], p = 0.55 for PFS and HR = 1.10 [95% CI 0.88-1.37], p = 0.40 for OS). CONCLUSION Oral etoposide retains some efficacy in selected heavily pre-treated patients with HER2-negative MBC, with the advantages of oral administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luc Cabel
- Institut Curie, 35 rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
| | | | | | | | - Florence Dalenc
- Institut Claudius regaud-IUCT-Oncopole, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Olympios N, Lambertini M, Calbrix C, Saint-Ghislain M, Fontanilles M, Loeb A, Leheurteur M, Demeestere I, Di Fiore F, Perdrix A, Clatot F. Impact of deleterious germline BRCA mutations, addition of taxanes and use of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) on anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in early breast cancer (EBC) patients treated by adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy270.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|