Comparison between single-agent and combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis

Is cryoablation still suitable for advanced non-small cell lung cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy? A multicenter, prospective, randomized-controlled trial of eighty-seven patients

The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of cryoablation treatment in advanced NSCLC patients who had failed first-line chemotherapy. Eighty-seven patients from ten hospitals in China were enrolled into the study, forty-four patients received cryoablation treatment plus basic treatment (experimental group), and forty-three patients had basic treatment alone (control group). Follow-up was performed once every three months until the end of the study or the death of the patient. The primary endpoints were overall and post-intervention survival; secondary endpoints included tumor markers, solid tumor efficacy, and symptom changes before and after treatment. There was no significant difference in median OS between the two groups of patients (9.0 months vs 11.2 months, P = 0.583). The disease control rate (DCR) and living quality of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group. In terms of OS, indiscriminate use of cryoablation for such patients was not beneficial, though it could improve symptoms of patients. Cryoablation had a significant effect on selected advanced NSCLC patients after the failure of first-line chemotherapy.

Could S-1-based non-platinum doublet chemotherapy be a new option as a second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A multicenter retrospective study

Background

For patients who have contraindications to or have failed checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy remains the standard second-line option to treat non-oncogene-addicted advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1-based non-platinum combination in advanced NSCLC patients who had failed platinum doublet chemotherapy.

Methods

During January 2015 and May 2020, advanced NSCLC patients who received S-1 plus docetaxel or gemcitabine after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy were consecutively retrieved from eight cancer centers. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. By using the method of matching-adjusted indirect comparison, the individual PFS and OS of included patients were adjusted by weight matching and then compared with those of the docetaxel arm in a balanced trial population (East Asia S-1 Trial in Lung Cancer).

Results

A total of 87 patients met the inclusion criteria. The ORR was 22.89% (vs. 10% of historical control, p < 0.001) and the DCR was 80.72%. The median PFS and OS were 5.23 months (95% CI: 3.91–6.55 months) and 14.40 months (95% CI: 13.21–15.59 months), respectively. After matching with a balanced population in the docetaxel arm from the East Asia S-1 Trial in Lung Cancer, the weighted median PFS and OS were 7.90 months (vs. 2.89 months) and 19.37 months (vs. 12.52 months), respectively. Time to start of first subsequent therapy (TSFT) from first-line chemotherapy (TSFT > 9 months vs. TSFT ≤ 9 months) was an independent predictive factor of second-line PFS (8.7 months vs. 5.0 months, HR = 0.461, p = 0.049). The median OS in patients who achieved response was 23.5 months (95% CI: 11.8–31.6 months), which was significantly longer than those with stable disease (14.9 months, 95% CI: 12.9–19.4 months, p < 0.001) or progression (4.9 months, 95% CI: 3.2–9.5 months, p < 0.001). The most common adverse events were anemia (60.92%), nausea (55.17%), and leukocytopenia (33.33%).

Conclusions

S-1-based non-platinum combination had promising efficacy and safety in advanced NSCLC patients who had failed platinum doublet chemotherapy, suggesting that it could be a favorable second-line treatment option.

Anlotinib Hydrochloride and PD-1 Blockade as a Salvage Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Progress of Local Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Half a Year After Standard Treatment

Purpose

As for local advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the standard treatment mode. But for patients with progress in half a year, which means the second-line chemotherapy effect is not ideal for them. We observed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib hydrochloride combined with PD-1 blockade as the second-line treatment for those patients in this trial.

Patients and Methods

From January 2018 to December 2019, 57 patients with the progress of local advanced NSCLC treated with anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade until disease progression or intolerance as a result of adverse events. Patients have been assessed using computed tomography prior to treatment and during follow-up every 2 months until disease progression or death. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

57 patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, and 61.4% of the patients were men. The ORR was 50.9% with a median OS time of 14 months and the 1-year OS rates and PFS rates were 81.8% and 33.3%, respectively. The patients with squamous cell carcinoma, no brain or liver metastases had longer PFS than patients with liver metastasis. When the PFS was calculated from the time of second treatment, the median PFS was 9 months. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-3, one drug-related death was noted.

Conclusion

The expected outcome of this study is that anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockade has tolerable toxicity and better ORR, OS than second-line chemotherapy. The results may indicate additional treatment options for patients with progress of local advance NSCLC in half a year after standard treatment.

Targeted Delivery of Drugs and Genes Using Polymer Nanocarriers for Cancer Therapy

Cancer is one of the primary causes of worldwide human deaths. Most cancer patients receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but these treatments are usually only partially efficacious and lead to a variety of serious side effects. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new therapeutic strategies. The emergence of nanotechnology has had a profound impact on general clinical treatment. The application of nanotechnology has facilitated the development of nano-drug delivery systems (NDDSs) that are highly tumor selective and allow for the slow release of active anticancer drugs. In recent years, vehicles such as liposomes, dendrimers and polymer nanomaterials have been considered promising carriers for tumor-specific drug delivery, reducing toxicity and improving biocompatibility. Among them, polymer nanoparticles (NPs) are one of the most innovative methods of non-invasive drug delivery. Here, we review the application of polymer NPs in drug delivery, gene therapy, and early diagnostics for cancer therapy.