Impact of fedratinib on the pharmacokinetics of transporter probe substrates using a cocktail approach

Innovative Approaches to Optimize Clinical Transporter Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

Of the 450 cell membrane transporters responsible for shuttling substrates, nutrients, hormones, neurotransmitters, antioxidants, and signaling molecules, approximately nine are associated with clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to their role in drug and metabolite transport. Therefore, a clinical study evaluating potential transporter DDIs is recommended if an investigational product is intestinally absorbed, undergoes renal or hepatic elimination, or is suspected to either be a transporter substrate or perpetrator. However, many of the transporter substrates and inhibitors administered during a DDI study also affect cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity, which can complicate data interpretation. To overcome these challenges, the assessment of endogenous biomarkers can help elucidate the mechanism of complex DDIs when multiple transporters or CYPs may be involved. This perspective article will highlight how creative study designs are currently being utilized to address complex transporter DDIs and the role of physiology-based -pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models can play.

Transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions: regulatory guidelines, in vitro and in vivo methodologies and translation, special populations, and the blood-brain barrier

This review, part of a special issue on drug-drug interactions (DDIs) spearheaded by the International Society for the Study of Xenobiotics (ISSX) New Investigators, explores the critical role of drug transporters in absorption, disposition, and clearance in the context of DDIs. Over the past two decades, significant advances have been made in understanding the clinical relevance of these transporters. Current knowledge on key uptake and efflux transporters that affect drug disposition and development is summarized. Regulatory guidelines from the FDA, EMA, and PMDA that inform the evaluation of potential transporter-mediated DDIs are discussed in detail. Methodologies for preclinical and clinical testing to assess potential DDIs are reviewed, with an emphasis on the utility of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. This includes the application of relative abundance and expression factors to predict human pharmacokinetics (PK) using preclinical data, integrating the latest regulatory guidelines. Considerations for assessing transporter-mediated DDIs in special populations, including pediatric, hepatic, and renal impairment groups, are provided. Additionally, the impact of transporters at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) on the disposition of CNS-related drugs is explored. Enhancing the understanding of drug transporters and their role in drug disposition and toxicity can improve efficacy and reduce adverse effects. Continued research is essential to bridge remaining gaps in knowledge, particularly in comparison with cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes.

Relative bioavailability of fedratinib through various alternative oral administration methods in healthy adults

Fedratinib is an oral Janus kinase 2-selective inhibitor for the treatment of adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis; however, some patients have difficulty with oral dosing. This randomized, phase 1, open-label, 2-part crossover study evaluated the relative bioavailability, safety, tolerability, taste, and palatability of fedratinib resulting from various alternative oral administration methods in healthy adults. Participants could receive fedratinib 400 mg orally as intact capsules along with a nutritional supplement; as contents of capsules dispersed in a nutritional supplement, delivered via nasogastric tube; or as a divided dose of 200 mg orally twice daily as intact capsules with a nutritional supplement. Fifty-eight participants received treatment. Total exposure to fedratinib was similar after oral administration of intact capsules or when dispersed in a nutritional supplement (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration geometric mean ratio [AUC0-t GMR] [90% CI], 1.007 [0.929-1.092]). Total exposure to fedratinib was slightly reduced following nasogastric administration (AUC0-t GMR 0.850 [0.802-0.901]) and as a divided dose (AUC0-t GMR 0.836 [0.789-0.886]). No new safety signals were identified for fedratinib, and most participants found the taste and palatability acceptable when dispersed in a nutritional supplement. Overall, results suggest no clinically meaningful differences in total exposure to fedratinib between the tested oral administration methods. These findings may facilitate administration of fedratinib to patients who are intolerant of swallowing the capsule dosage form. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05051553).

Use of a Double-Transfected System to Predict hOCT2/hMATE1-Mediated Renal Drug-Drug Interactions

Accurate predictions of renal drug-drug interactions (DDIs) mediated by the human organic cation transporter 2 (hOCT2) and multidrug and toxin extrusion proteins (hMATEs) remain challenging. Current DDI evaluation using plasma maximal unbound inhibitor concentrations (Imax,u) and IC50 values determined in single transporter-transfected cells frequently leads to false or overprediction especially for hMATE1. Emerging evidence suggests intracellular unbound inhibitor concentration may be more relevant for hMATE1 inhibition in vivo. However, determination of intrarenal inhibitor concentrations is impractical. Here, we explored the use of hOCT2/hMATE1 double-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells as a new in vitro tool for DDI risk assessment. Our results showed that potent in vitro hMATE1 inhibitors (hydroxychloroquine, brigatinib, and famotidine) failed to inhibit metformin B-to-A flux in the double-transfected system. On the other side, the classic hOCT2/hMATE1 inhibitors, pyrimethamine and cimetidine, dose-dependently inhibited metformin apparent B-to-A permeability (Papp). The different behaviors of these hMATE1 inhibitors in the double-transfected system can be explained by their different ability to gain intracellular access either via passive diffusion or transporter-mediated uptake. A new parameter (IC50,flux) was proposed reflecting the inhibitor's potency on overall hOCT2/hMATE1-mediated tubular secretion. The IC50,flux values significantly differ from the IC50 values determined in single transporter-transfected cells. Importantly, the IC50,flux accurately predicted in vivo DDIs (within 2-fold) when used in a static model. Our data demonstrated that the IC50,flux approach circumvents the need to measure intracellular inhibitor concentrations and more accurately predicted hOCT2/hMATE1-mediated renal DDIs. This system represents a new approach that could be used for improved DDI assessment during drug development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study demonstrated that flux studies in double-transfected MDCK cells and the IC50,flux represents a better approach to assess in vivo DDI potential for the renal organic cation secretion system. This study highlights the importance of inhibitor intracellular accessibility for accurate prediction of hMATE1-mediated renal DDIs. This approach has the potential to identify in vitro hMATE1 inhibitors that are unlikely to result in in vivo DDIs, thus reducing the burden of unnecessary and costly clinical DDI investigations.

Quantitative Consideration of Clinical Increases in Serum Creatinine Caused by Renal Transporter Inhibition

Creatinine is a common biomarker of renal function and is secreted in the renal tubular cells via drug transporters, such as organic cation transporter 2 and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 1/2-K. To differentiate between drug-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and drug interactions through the renal transporter, it has been examined whether these transporter inhibitions quantitatively explained increases in serum creatinine (SCr) at their clinically relevant concentrations using drugs without any changes in renal function. For such renal transporter inhibitors and recently approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), this mini-review describes clinical increases in SCr and inhibitory potentials against the renal transporters. Most cases of SCr elevations can be explained by considering the renal transporter inhibitions based on unbound maximum plasma concentrations, except for drugs associated with obvious changes in renal function. SCr increases for cobicistat, dolutegravir, and dronedarone, and some TKIs were significantly underestimated, and these underestimations were suggested to be associated with low plasma unbound fractions. Sensitivity analysis of SCr elevations regarding inhibitory potentials of MATE1/2-K demonstrated that typical inhibitors such as cimetidine, DX-619, pyrimethamine, and trimethoprim could give false interpretations of AKI according to the criteria based on relative or absolute levels of SCr elevations. Recent progress and current challenges of physiologically-based pharmacokinetics modeling for creatinine disposition were also summarized. Although it should be noted for the potential impact of in vitro assay designs on clinical translatability of transporter inhibitions data, mechanistic approaches could support decision-making in clinical development to differentiate between AKI and creatinine-drug interactions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Serum creatinine (SCr) is widely used as an indicator of kidney function, but it increases due to inhibitions of renal transporters, such as multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1/2-K despite no functional changes in the kidney. Such SCr elevations were quantitatively explained by renal transporter inhibitions except for some drugs with high protein binding. The present analysis demonstrated that clinically relevant inhibitors of the renal transporters could cause SCr elevations above levels corresponding to acute kidney injury criteria.

An evaluation of fedratinib for adult patients with newly diagnosed and previously treated myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a life-shortening myeloproliferative neoplasm that has multiple features such as clonal proliferation, fibrosis and splenomegaly. Until recently, ruxolitinib, a Janus Kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor was the only targeted therapy approved for transplant-ineligible patients with MF and who require treatment for symptoms and/or splenomegaly. However, the discontinuation rate with ruxolitinib at 3 to 5 years is high and mostly due to loss of response or toxicity, and these patients had no subsequent treatment.

AREAS COVERED

Fedratinib, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2019 for the treatment of intermediate-2 or high-risk primary or secondary MF, regardless of prior JAK inhibitor treatment for the management of symptoms and splenomegaly. We discuss herein the development of fedratinib and its pharmacology and pharmacokinetics as well as the clinical development and the future directions. We used PubMed for the search of articles related to fedratinib and myelofibrosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Fedratinib provided a second-line treatment for patients with MF who failed or discontinued ruxolitinib. New combinations of JAK inhibitors with other targeted therapies are a must in order to improve the management of MF.

Fedratinib: a pharmacotherapeutic option for JAK-inhibitor naïve and exposed patients with myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Ruxolitinib is the most commonly used JAK-inhibitor (JAKi) for the management of symptoms related to splenomegaly and cytokine-mediated inflammation in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), but is limited by variable durability of response with most patients experiencing failure after 2-3 years. Long-term data on other approved JAKi, fedratinib and pacritinib, are not available due to the clinical hold put on pivotal trials for toxicity concerns.

AREAS COVERED

Following the initial hold for concern of Wernicke's encephalopathy, fedratinib was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 for MF. We review the data available from early, and late phase critical trials, outline a role for fedratinib in the current treatment landscape of MF, and highlight the knowledge gaps in optimizing use of fedratinib.

EXPERT OPINION

The JAKARTA and JAKARTA2 trials established efficacy in spleen volume response (SVR) and symptom reduction in JAKi-naïve and ruxolitinib-exposed MF patients, respectively. Further trials, FREEDOM and FREEDOM2, are in progress to understand long-term effects of fedratinib; and include strategies to mitigate gastrointestinal toxicity, monitor thiamine levels and surveil for encephalopathy. We use fedratinib for symptomatic MF following ruxolitinib failure in patients without significant cytopenias; with practical strategies for monitoring and managing potential toxicity.

Effect of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of fedratinib in healthy adults

Purpose

Fedratinib is an orally administered Janus kinase (JAK) 2–selective inhibitor for the treatment of adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk primary or secondary myelofibrosis. In vitro, fedratinib is predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C19. Coadministration of fedratinib with CYP3A4 inhibitors is predicted to increase systemic exposure to fedratinib. This study evaluated the effect of multiple doses of the dual CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inhibitor, fluconazole, on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of fedratinib.

Methods

In this non-randomized, fixed-sequence, open-label study, healthy adult participants first received a single oral dose of fedratinib 100 mg on day 1. Participants then received fluconazole 400 mg on day 10 and fluconazole 200 mg once daily on days 11–23, with a single oral dose of fedratinib 100 mg on day 18. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for fedratinib administered with and without fluconazole.

Results

A total of 16 participants completed the study and were included in the pharmacokinetic population. Coadministration of fedratinib with fluconazole increased maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0–t) of fedratinib by 21% and 56%, respectively, compared with fedratinib alone. Single oral doses of fedratinib 100 mg administered with or without fluconazole were well tolerated.

Conclusions

Systemic exposure after a single oral dose of fedratinib was increased by up to 56% when fedratinib was coadministered with fluconazole compared with fedratinib alone.

Trial registry: Clinicaltrials.gov

NCT04702464.

Pharmacoproteomics of Brain Barrier Transporters and Substrate Design for the Brain Targeted Drug Delivery

One of the major reasons why central nervous system (CNS)-drug development has been challenging in the past, is the barriers that prevent substances entering from the blood circulation into the brain. These barriers include the blood-brain barrier (BBB), blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB), blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB), and blood-arachnoid barrier (BAB), and they differ from each other in their transporter protein expression and function as well as among the species. The quantitative expression profiles of the transporters in the CNS-barriers have been recently revealed, and in this review, it is described how they affect the pharmacokinetics of compounds and how these expression differences can be taken into account in the prediction of brain drug disposition in humans, an approach called pharmacoproteomics. In recent years, also structural biology and computational resources have progressed remarkably, enabling a detailed understanding of the dynamic processes of transporters. Molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) are currently used commonly to reveal the conformational changes of the transporters and to find the interactions between the substrates and the protein during the binding, translocation in the transporter cavity, and release of the substrate on the other side of the membrane. The computational advancements have also aided in the rational design of transporter-utilizing compounds, including prodrugs that can be actively transported without losing potency towards the pharmacological target. In this review, the state-of-art of these approaches will be also discussed to give insights into the transporter-mediated drug delivery to the CNS.

Impact of fedratinib on the pharmacokinetics of transporter probe substrates using a cocktail approach

INTRODUCTION

Fedratinib, an oral, selective Janus kinase 2 inhibitor, has been shown to inhibit P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, OATP1B3, organic cation transporter (OCT) 2, and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 1 and MATE2-K in vitro. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of fedratinib on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of digoxin (P-gp substrate), rosuvastatin (OATP1B1/1B3 and BCRP substrate), and metformin (OCT2 and MATE1/2-K substrate).

METHODS

In this nonrandomized, fixed-sequence, open-label study, 24 healthy adult participants received single oral doses of digoxin 0.25 mg, rosuvastatin 10 mg, and metformin 1000 mg administered as a drug cocktail (day 1, period 1). After a 6-day washout, participants received oral fedratinib 600 mg 1 h before the cocktail on day 7 (period 2). An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed to determine possible influences of fedratinib on the antihyperglycemic effect of metformin.

RESULTS

Plasma exposure to the three probe drugs was generally comparable in the presence or absence of fedratinib. Reduced metformin renal clearance by 36% and slightly higher plasma glucose levels after OGTT were observed in the presence of fedratinib. Single oral doses of the cocktail ± fedratinib were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that fedratinib has minimal impact on the exposure of P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1/1B3, OCT2, and MATE1/2-K substrates. Since renal clearance of metformin was decreased in the presence of fedratinib, caution should be exercised in using coadministered drugs that are renally excreted via OCT2 and MATEs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04231435 on January 18, 2020.