A case of brucellar monoarthritis and review of the literature

Brucella Septic Hip Arthritis: A Case Report

Patient: Female, 7-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Septic hip brucelosis

Symptoms: Hip pain

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Orthopedics and Traumatology

Hip osteoarticular complication due to delay in diagnosis and treatment of brucellar hip arthritis: two cases report

BACKGROUND

Brucellosis is a systemic infectious disease frequently associated with osteoarticular involvement. While sacroiliitis is a common manifestation of brucellosis, septic osteoarthritis is less frequent. Here, we report two cases of septic osteoarthritis caused by Brucella melitensis.

CASE PRESENTATION

Both patients had a history of contact with goats before admission. Upon clinical examination, they showed marked pain and limited movement in the hip. Imaging findings revealed obvious osteonecrosis of the right femoral head. Inflammatory markers, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level, were elevated. The tube agglutination test results of both patients were positive (1:160 and 1:200). Real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of synovial fluid revealed the presence of B. melitensis. We deduced that septic osteoarthritis could explain these clinical and radiological findings. Both patients were followed-up for 12 months. They returned to their normal routine after completing a standard antibiotic regimen, including doxycycline (100 mg, daily) and rifampicin (600 mg), for 6 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Brucellar hip arthritis is a serious clinical manifestation of brucellosis, presenting mainly as marked joint pain and limited mobility. It is characterized by joint effusion, synovitis, and soft-tissue swelling on magnetic resonance images. Physicians should consider brucellosis as one of the differential diagnoses of arthritis.

Osteoarticular manifestations of human brucellosis: A review

Brucellosis is a common global zoonotic disease, which is responsible for a range of clinical manifestations. Fever, sweating and musculoskeletal pains are observed in most patients. The most frequent complication of brucellosis is osteoarticular involvement, with 10% to 85% of patients affected. The sacroiliac (up to 80%) and spinal joints (up to 54%) are the most common affected sites. Spondylitis and spondylodiscitis are the most frequent complications of brucellar spinal involvement. Peripheral arthritis, osteomyelitis, discitis, bursitis and tenosynovitis are other osteoarticular manifestations, but with a lower prevalence. Spinal brucellosis has two forms: focal and diffuse. Epidural abscess is a rare complication of spinal brucellosis but can lead to permanent neurological deficits or even death if not treated promptly. Spondylodiscitis is the most severe form of osteoarticular involvement by brucellosis, and can have single- or multi-focal involvement. Early and appropriate diagnosis and treatment of the disease is important in order to have a successful management of the patients with osteoarticular brucellosis. Brucellosis should be considered as a differential diagnosis for sciatic and back pain, especially in endemic regions. Patients with septic arthritis living in endemic areas also need to be evaluated in terms of brucellosis. Physical examination, laboratory tests and imaging techniques are needed to diagnose the disease. Radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy are imaging techniques for the diagnosis of osteoarticular brucellosis. MRI is helpful to differentiate between pyogenic spondylitis and brucellar spondylitis. Drug medications (antibiotics) and surgery are the only two options for the treatment and cure of osteoarticular brucellosis.

Diagnostic role of inflammatory markers in pediatric Brucella arthritis

Background

As a multisystem infectious disease, there is an inflammation, which causes increase in acute phase reactants in brucellosis. The mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been identified as markers of inflammation. The present study aimed to evaluate diagnostic values of these biomarkers in brucella arthritis (BA).

Methods

The study included 64 children with BA and 66 healthy control subjects. Demographic features, joint involvement, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and hematological variables were retrospectively recorded. In addition, results of synovial fluid and serum tube agglutination test for brucella together with treatment regimens were recorded.

Results

The mean age of the patients (53.1 % male) was 92.3 ± 41.2 months. The most commonly affected joint was ankle (53.1 %). Synovial fluid puncture-brucella agglutination test was positive in 22 (34.3 %) patients. Puncture culture was positive in 9 patients. Most of the patients (57.8 %) were treated with a combination of rifampicin plus sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim and gentamicin. Significantly higher mean PDW, RDW, MPV, NLR and PLR values were found in children with BA compared to control subjects (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was found between MPV and NLR values (R² = 0.192, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that NLR and PLR are indirect markers of inflammation that may be observed abnormally increased in children with brucella arthritis. Further longitudinal studies are needed to investigate this topic to establish the more clear associations.

Biologically hazardous agents at work and efforts to protect workers' health: a review of recent reports

Because information on biological agents in the workplace is lacking, biological hazard analyses at the workplace to securely recognize the harmful factors with biological basis are desperately needed. This review concentrates on literatures published after 2010 that attempted to detect biological hazards to humans, especially workers, and the efforts to protect them against these factors. It is important to improve the current understanding of the health hazards caused by biological factors at the workplace. In addition, this review briefly describes these factors and provides some examples of their adverse health effects. It also reviews risk assessments, protection with personal protective equipment, prevention with training of workers, regulations, as well as vaccinations.