Contrast enhanced ultrasound in the detection of liver metastases: a prospective multi-centre dose testing study using a perfluorobutane microbubble contrast agent (NC100100)

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound With SonoVue and Sonazoid for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Liver Metastasis After Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of SonoVue and Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in correctly detecting and characterizing colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) after chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with CRLMs treated with chemotherapy and subsequently scheduled for hepatic resection were prospectively enrolled from April 2020 to January 2021. Lesions detected by SonoVue or Sonazoid CEUS were recorded as and characterized as metastases or non-metastatic lesions respectively. Histopathology or intraoperative ultrasound with MRI were the reference standard.

RESULTS

A total of 348 focal liver lesions in 42 patients were investigated, including 297 CRLMs and 51 non-metastatic lesions. SonoVue showed significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (64.7% versus 54.0%; P < .001) and sensitivity (63.3% versus 50.5%; P < .001) in the diagnosis of CRLMs than Sonazoid, both methods presented with similar specificity (72.5% versus 74.5%; P = 1.0). Forty metastases appeared non-hypoenhancing (hyperenhancing or isoenhancing) in the late phase and postvascular phase of Sonazoid CEUS and were mischaracterized as benign lesions.

CONCLUSION

SonoVue performed significantly better than Sonazoid in the diagnosis of CRLMs after chemotherapy.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the liver: a review of the clinical evidence for SonoVue and Sonazoid

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has become an established modality in various clinical indications for liver diseases. SonoVue^®, a pure blood pure agent, and Sonazoid^®, which exhibits an additional Kupffer phase, are contrast agents approved for liver imaging. This review discusses and compares the current clinical evidence for these two ultrasound contrast agents in the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions in the non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic liver, as well as for the use in interventional procedures such as liver biopsy guidance, and local ablation treatment monitoring. Reference is made to clinical studies which evaluated the accuracy of CEUS using a standard of reference, its safety, or to comparative studies of these two agents.

Perfluorobutane contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: a new standard for ultrasonography-guided thermal ablation of sonographically occult liver tumours?

INTRODUCTION

Image-guided thermal ablation, preferably with ultrasonography (US), is increasingly used for treatment of small liver tumours. Perfluorobutane-contrast enhanced US (pCEUS) is a promising tool that may allow for targeting of tumours that are otherwise imperceptible on greyscale US. Although pCEUS has been reported to be effective, the literature has been limited outside of Japan and South Korea. We aimed to provide data that supports the use of pCEUS in thermal ablation of sonographically occult liver tumours.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of 35 consecutive patients who underwent pCEUS-guided ablation of 48 liver tumours with a median size of 1.2 cm. Periprocedural, one-month post-treatment, and relevant follow-up imaging studies were reviewed. Electronic records were also obtained, with long-term follow-up data of 12-28 months being available for 32 patients.

RESULTS

36 (75%) of tumours that were imperceptible on greyscale US became visible with pCEUS. Overall, complete tumour ablation at one month was 89%. 1 (3%) patient developed a major complication following treatment, while 6 (17%) had minor post-treatment complaints. The local tumour progression rate was 17% with a median time of 14 months.

CONCLUSION

pCEUS has a role in US-guided thermal ablation of liver tumours, offering a high technical success rate that is comparable to reported data. Additional benefits may include improved procedural time and freedom from ionising radiation.

Three Decades of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Review of the Past, Present and Future Improvements

Initial reports from the 1960s describing the observations of ultrasound contrast enhancement by tiny gaseous bubbles during echocardiographic examinations prompted the development of the first ultrasound contrast agent in the 1980s. Current commercial contrast agents for echography, such as Definity, Optison, Sonazoid and SonoVue, have proven to be successful in a variety of on- and off-label clinical indications. Whereas contrast-specific technology has seen dramatic progress after the introduction of the first approved agents in the 1990s, successful clinical translation of new developments has been limited during the same period, while understanding of microbubble physical, chemical and biologic behavior has improved substantially. It is expected that for a successful development of future opportunities, such as ultrasound molecular imaging and therapeutic applications using microbubbles, new creative developments in microbubble engineering and production dedicated to further optimizing microbubble performance are required, and that they cannot rely on bubble technology developed more than 3 decades ago.

Value of Perfusion Parameters for Differentiating Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Metastasis With Hypervascularity and a Normal Hepatic Background on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) perfusion parameters in the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and metastatic liver tumors (MLTs) with hypervascularity.

METHODS

Sixty-seven HCCs and 55 MLTs with arterial homogeneous/heterogeneous hyperenhancement on CEUS imaging and a normal liver background were included in this retrospective study. Six CEUS perfusion parameters were compared between HCCs and MLTs with different sizes and HCC differentiations: rise time (RT), time to peak (TTP), mean transit time, wash-out time (WT), maximum intensity (IMAX), and area under the curve (AUC). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was determined to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the parameters.

RESULTS

The RT, TTP, and WT were significant longer and the IMAX and AUC were significantly higher in HCCs than in MLTs. In distinguishing between HCCs and MLTs, the AUROC was highest for the WT (0.922; sensitivity, 85.1%; specificity, 89.6%); the AUC and IMAX had the second and third highest AUROCs (AUC: 0.855; sensitivity, 76.1%; specificity, 80.6%; IMAX: 0.827; sensitivity, 76.1%; specificity, 77.6%). The AUROC was lowest for the TTP and RT (TTP: 0.719; sensitivity, 70.1%; specificity, 61.2%; RT: 0.707; sensitivity, 67.2%; specificity, 65.7%). In HCCs, both the tumor size and degree of differentiation affected the IMAX, AUC, and WT. In MLTs, perfusion parameters were not influenced by the tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

In HCCs and MLTs with hypervascularity and a normal liver background on CEUS imaging, various CEUS perfusion parameters, including IMAX, AUC, WT, RT, and TTP, differed significantly between tumor types. The WT may be the most useful parameter for differentiating between these tumors.

A New Method to Quantify Concentration of Microbubbles in Attenuating Media Using Bubble Destruction Curve Analysis of the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

It is known that the microbubbles of Sonazoid are accumulated in the liver parenchyma due to the phagocytosis of Kupffer cells in the sinusoid. Because this phagocytic function decreases due to the progression of fibrosis in chronic liver disease, the deterioration of the liver function may be quantified by measuring the concentration of the accumulated Sonazoid microbubbles. In this article, a new method to quantify the concentration of microbubbles accumulated in attenuating media is proposed. This method utilizes the contrast-enhanced imaging with high mechanical index, measures the depth of the bubble destruction for each frame and analyze the shape of the destruction curve to estimate the concentration of the bubbles. A phantom experiment was performed with various concentrations of the contrast agent Sonazoid solution as well as various attenuation coefficients of the viscous media. Because of the theoretical model proposed, the estimated attenuation indexes, related to the concentration of Sonazoid microbubbles, were independent of the background attenuation of the propagating medium. The result suggest it has a potential to quantify Sonazoid concentration in the liver parenchyma more precisely against different liver attenuation conditions.

Comparison of Sonazoid and SonoVue in the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of Sonazoid and SonoVue in subjects with focal liver lesions.

METHODS

The patients who had untreated focal solid liver lesions confirmed by B-mode ultrasonography were eligible for the study. The target lesion and whole liver were scanned by gray scale ultrasonography; then, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed, and the results were evaluated blindly. The main end point was accuracy improvement with postcontrast versus precontrast ultrasound examination for diagnosis of the target lesion of interest as malignant or benign against the reference standard.

RESULTS

There were 65 patients with 65 hepatic tumors enrolled in the study. The improvement of diagnostic accuracy was 0.30 in the Sonazoid group and 0.16 in the SonoVue group (95% confidence interval, -0.828-0.168; P = .24). Using 20% as the noninferiority margin, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (0.168) was less than 0.20. The number of lesions detected during the whole-liver scanning in the Sonazoid group was significantly more than that detected in the SonoVue group (P = .024).

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis value of Sonazoid is noninferior to SonoVue, and this new contrast agent can improves the whole-liver image quality.

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

We performed comprehensive searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies reporting the per-lesion diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases. Studies published between January 2003 and December 2018 with reference standards, including histopathology and intraoperative observation, and/or follow-up, were included. Sources of bias were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A linear mixed-effects regression model was used to determine sensitivity estimates.

RESULTS

Overall, 47 articles were included. The sensitivity estimates for contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases were 85.3%, 83.0%, and 90.1%, respectively. For lesions ≥10 mm in diameter, the sensitivities were 93.1%, 92.9%, and 94.5%, respectively. In 21 articles using histopathology as the only reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio for contrast-enhanced ultrasound/contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were 86%/91%, 91%/95%, 9.2/16.6, 0.15/0.10, and 61/170, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS showed a diagnostic ability comparable to that of DWI and CEMRI, particularly for lesions ≥10 mm in diameter.

Differentiating Cystic Liver Lesions: A Review of Imaging Modalities, Diagnosis and Management

Hepatic cysts (HCs) are frequently discovered incidentally on abdominal imaging. The prevalence of HCs has been reported as high as 15-18% in the United States. Although most cysts are benign, some are malignant or premalignant. It is important to diagnose cystic lesions in order to properly manage them. Imaging with conventional ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used to further characterize and diagnose HCs. Ultrasound is typically the first-line imaging modality, whereas more advanced imaging can help narrow down the specific lesion. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a newer modality, recently approved in the United States, which offers non-invasive evaluation in real-time. The first step in diagnosis is stratifying risk by differentiating simple and complex cysts. There are several features that can help identify HCs, including septae, mural consistency, calcifications, and quality of cystic fluid. Simple cysts are mainly congenital cysts, but also occur in polycystic liver disease. Complex cysts include mucinous neoplasms, echinococcal cysts, hemorrhagic cysts, cystic hepatocellular carcinoma and other rare lesions. Treatment is indicated in symptomatic cysts or those suspicious for malignant or premalignant features. Treatment modalities include fenestration, aspiration sclerotherapy, or surgical resection.

Visibility of focal liver lesions: Comparison between kupffer phase of CEUS with sonazoid and hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

BACKGROUND

To investigate the agreement between Kupffer phase of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) and hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

One hundred fifty-four FLLs in 154 patients who underwent both Sonazoid CEUS and gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI were included in this retrospective study. FLL visibility on the Kupffer-phase images was graded as one (invisible or isoenhancing), two (vaguely visible or vaguely hypoenhancing), or three (clearly visible or clearly hypoenhancing), and that on the hepatobiliary-phase images of MRI was graded as one (invisible or hyper/isointense), two (vaguely visible or weakly hypointense), or three (clearly visible or strongly hypointense). Pairwise comparison of lesion visibility between the two modalities was performed, and intermodality agreement was assessed.

RESULTS

On Kupffer-phase CEUS, 31 (20.1%) lesions were invisible, 17 (11.1%) were vaguely visible, and 106 (68.9%) were clearly visible. On the hepatobiliary-phase MRI, 9 (5.9%) lesions were invisible, 45 (29.2%) were vaguely visible, and 100 (64.9%) were clearly visible. Overall, lesion visibility scores were not significantly different between the two modalities (p = 0.121), but the visibility was significantly better on MRI in smaller lesions. Twenty-eight lesions (18.2%) showed discrepancy in the visibility on CEUS and MRI, and most of the cases (89.7%) were lesions that were invisible on CEUS but visible on MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall visibility of FLLs was comparable between the Kupffer phase of Sonazoid-CEUS and the hepatobiliary-phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, with a discrepancy between the two modalities in 18% of the cases. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 45:542-550, 2017.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of histologically proven small (≤20 mm) liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features of histologically proved small (≤20 mm) liver metastases, in comparison to small (≤20 mm) hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), to define the differentiate diagnoses value of CEUS in clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-two cases of small (≤20 mm) liver metastases and 84 cases of small (≤20 mm) HCC were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had CEUS images. Two radiologists assessed CEUS enhancement pattern and time of enhancement in consensus. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v.19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The χ² test and the independent sample t-test were used to compare the differences.

RESULTS

Comparing to small HCCs, rapid rim-like hyper-enhancement in arterial phase (56.1% in liver metastases vs. 2.3% in HCCs, p < .01), rapid wash-out and become hypo-enhancement in late arterial phase or early portal venous phase (96.4% in liver metastases vs. 22.6% in HCCs, p < .01) with central non-enhanced area in late phase were characteristic CEUS features of small metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS imaging enhancement findings reliably offer typical signs of small liver metastases, differentiate effectively with small HCCs. CEUS can help to improve the diagnostic confidence of small liver metastases.

Evaluation of Liver Metastases Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Enhancement Patterns and Influencing Factors

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the enhancement patterns of liver metastases and their influencing factors using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHODS

A total of 240 patients (139 male and 101 female; 58.5 ± 11.2 years of age) diagnosed with liver metastases in our hospital were enrolled in this study to evaluate tumor characteristics using CEUS. A comparison of enhancement patterns with tumor size and primary tumor type was performed using the chi-square test. The differences between quantitative variables were evaluated with the independent-sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The enhancement patterns of liver metastases on CEUS were categorized as diffuse homogeneous hyperenhancement (133/240, 55.4%), rim-like hyperenhancement (80/240, 33.3%), heterogeneous hyperenhancement (10/240, 4.2%), and isoenhancement (17/240, 7.1%). There were significant differences in the enhancement patterns during the arterial phase based on the nodule size (p=0.001). A total of 231 of the nodules showed complete washout during the portal phase, and 237 nodules were hypoenhanced during the delayed phase. The washout time was correlated with tumor vascularity, with a longer washout time observed in hypervascular metastases compared to hypovascular metastases (p=0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Diffuse homogeneous hyperenhancement followed by rapid washout was the most common enhancement pattern of liver metastases on CEUS and was affected by the nodule size and tumor vascularity. Small metastases were prone to show diffuse homogeneous hyperenhancement. Hypervascular metastases showed a significantly longer washout time compared to hypovascular metastases.

Preoperative detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: Prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT)

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to prospectively compare the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with that of multiphase multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the preoperative detection of hepatic metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Forty-eight patients, with a mean age of 62years old (range: 43-85years) were prospectively included. All patients underwent CEUS following intravenous administration of 2.4mL of an ultrasound contrast agent (Sonovue(®), Bracco, Milan, Italy) and multiphase MDCT. Intraoperative ultrasound examination (IOUS) was used as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

A total of 158 liver metastases were identified by IOUS, 127 by preoperative MDCT (sensitivity; 80.4%) and 102 by CEUS (sensitivity, 64.5%). The 15.9% difference in sensitivity between CEUS and MDCT was statistically significant (P=0.002). There was a disagreement between IOUS and CEUS in 23 patients (47%) and in 13 patients (27%) between IOUS and MDCT. MDCT identified one or more additional metastases in 10 patients (20%) resulting in a change in the surgical strategy.

CONCLUSION

Based on an unselected patient cohort and using multiphase MDCT, CEUS is significantly inferior to MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Focal Liver Lesions

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to discuss the use of contrast-enhanced ultra-sound (CEUS) in focal liver lesions.

CONCLUSION

Focal liver lesions are usually detected incidentally during abdominal ultrasound. The injection of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents improves the characterization of focal liver lesions that are indeterminate on conventional ultrasound. The use of CEUS is recommended in official guidelines and suggested as a second diagnostic step after ultrasound detection of indeterminate focal liver lesions to immediately establish the diagnosis, especially for benign liver lesions, such as hemangiomas, avoiding further and more expensive examinations.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for assessing blood supply of liver metastases

AIM: To compare the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in assessing the blood supply of liver metastases (LM).

METHODS: Fifty-five patients with LM (70 nodules) who underwent both CEUS and CECT were included. The degree of enhancement in arterial phase, the appearance of vasa vasorum and the classification of the blood supply around the nodule were compared between CEUS and CECT.

RESULTS: The degree of enhancement in arterial phase was more significant for CEUS than for CECT (1: 59% vs 5%; 0: 41% vs 62%; -1: 0% vs 33%) (P < 0.05). The appearance of vasa vasorum around the nodule was significantly more frequent for CEUS than for CECT (54% vs 34%, χ² = 5.674, P = 0.017). The rate of abundant blood supply was 70% for CEUS, significantly higher than that for CECT (30%; χ² = 19.330, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION: CEUS is better than CECT in evaluation of blood supply of LM.

Real-time contrast-enhanced sonographically guided biopsy or radiofrequency ablation of focal liver lesions using perflurobutane microbubbles (sonazoid): value of Kupffer-phase imaging

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of Kupffer-phase imaging by real-time contrast-enhanced sonography using the perflurobutane microbubble contrast agent Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) in guiding biopsy or radiofrequency (RF) ablation of focal liver lesions.

METHODS

A total of 75 patients (mean age, 59.7 years) who were referred for percutaneous biopsy (n = 42) or RF ablation (n = 33) were included in the study. Grayscale sonography and contrast-enhanced sonography using Sonazoid were performed in all patients before the procedure. The conspicuity of each targeted liver lesion on grayscale sonography, vascular-phase contrast-enhanced sonography, and Kupffer-phase contrast-enhanced sonography was graded using a 5-point scale. Lesion detection rates were calculated, and the conspicuity of the lesions among the imaging modalities was compared. The technical success of the procedures was also assessed.

RESULTS

The procedures were conducted in 66 patients (biopsy in 41 and RF ablation in 25) under real-time guidance by Kupffer-phase contrast-enhanced sonography. Lesion detection rates were 77.3% (58 of 75), 84.0% (63 of 75), and 92.0% (69 of 75) on grayscale sonography, vascular-phase contrast-enhanced sonography, and Kupffer-phase contrast-enhanced sonography, respectively, and were significantly different among the 3 modalities (P= .034). Overall, lesion conspicuity was significantly increased on vascular-phase and Kupffer-phase contrast-enhanced sonography compared to grayscale sonography (P < .001). Technical success rates for the procedures were 95.2% (40 of 42) for biopsy and 69.7% (23 of 33) for RF ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Kupffer-phase imaging by contrast-enhanced sonography using Sonazoid increases the conspicuity of the liver lesions compared to grayscale sonography, and it is useful for real-time guidance of percutaneous biopsy or RF ablation of focal liver lesions.

Evaluation of contrast Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography for the detection of hepatic metastases in breast cancer

Background

The present study was aimed to evaluate the usefulness of contrast Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography (US) for the detection of hepatic metastases in breast cancer patients and compare the clinical efficacy and sensitivity of this technique with conventional contrast unenhanced B-mode US in follow-up examinations of breast cancer patients with liver metastasis.

Methods

We assessed a total of 84 hepatic tumors from 24 patients diagnosed with or suspected of having metastatic cancer. These hepatic nodules were diagnosed through imaging, including dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan, B-mode US or contrast Sonazoid-enhanced US (SEUS). Differences in the sensitivity between US and SEUS were compared using MR imaging, CECT, and follow-up imaging.

Results

A total of 79 nodules were diagnosed as metastatic tumors. The remaining nodules were diagnosed as benign tumors (hepatic hemangioma: n = 3; local fatty change: n = 2). SEUS precisely detected the presence or absence of hepatic tumors in the 24 patients examined, showing a sensitivity of 98.8 % (83 of 84 lesions) for total imaged solid liver lesions, with an accuracy of 98.7 % (78 of 79 lesions) for total metastatic breast cancer lesions. In contrast, conventional B-mode US imaging revealed hepatic tumor lesions at a sensitivity of 66.7 % (56 of 84 lesions) and an accuracy of 64.6 % (51 of 79 lesions), respectively. Furthermore, the false positive and false negative rates were, respectively, 6.33 and 29.1 % for B-mode US and 0 and 1.3 % for SEUS. Moreover, twenty-seven metastatic tumors and five benign lesions (3 hemangiomas and 2 focal fatty changes/sparings) were imaged using SEUS but not conventional B-mode US. Significant differences in diagnostic accuracy rates between contrast Sonazoid-enhanced US and conventional B-mode US were observed (Wilcoxon signed rank test: p = 0.0009). No severe adverse events occurred during SEUS after the administration of Sonazoid, except for a grade 1 skin reaction and nausea in one patient.

Conclusion

These results suggested that Sonazoid could be safely administrated to breast cancer patients with liver metastatic disease. Thus, contrast Sonazoid-enhanced US is a feasible and more effective method than B-mode US for the detection of hepatic metastasis, particularly for small metastatic breast cancer lesions less than 14 mm in diameter, showing significant high sensitivity and accuracy.

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound in identifying disappearing liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma after chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemotherapy sometimes makes colorectal liver metastases disappear or diminish. Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) using perflubutane may identify such metastases.

METHODS

Among 131 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection, 86 had received preoperative chemotherapy. Of these patients, 72 were examined using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS), and CE-IOUS; these patients were the subject of the present study. Effects of IOUS and CE-IOUS to search for disappearing liver metastases (DLM) and tumors with a diameter of 1 cm or less based on the preoperative imaging were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 32 DLMs were noted in 11 patients. Four DLMs were identified using IOUS, and 16 DLMs (including the four DLMs identified using IOUS) were identified using CE-IOUS. Of the 16 DLMs that were missed using both IOUS and CE-IOUS, nine were resected using anatomical resection and seven were not resected. One of the nine resected DLMs was histologically proven to be adenocarcinoma. Three of the seven unresected DLMs showed tumor regrowth during a postoperative follow-up examination. CE-IOUS identified 79 % of the 19 DLMs that were ultimately confirmed as liver metastases, whereas IOUS identified 21 % of them (p < 0.004). Among the 202 tumors that were identified using preoperative imaging, 54 were 1 cm or less in diameter. The sensitivity of CE-IOUS for these tumors were superior to CE-CT (p < 0.04) and IOUS (p < 0.04), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CE-IOUS might be necessary after preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastasis.

Natural history of postvascular-phase iso-enhanced lesions on the sonogram in chronic liver diseases

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study examined the natural history of postvascular-phase iso-enhanced lesions (PIELs) on contrast-enhanced sonograms to determine the potential risk and predictive factors for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic liver diseases.

METHODS

This prospective study included 87 PIELs on contrast-enhanced sonograms (postvascular-phase: 10 min post-injection of perflubutane microbubbles) in 72 patients with chronic liver diseases (45 males and 27 females; age 65.0 ± 10.8y; PIEL diameter 12.5 ± 4.2 mm). The PIELs were followed up by ultrasound/contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging at 3 to 6 months intervals.

RESULTS

Twenty patients developed HCCs during the study period (median, 22.0 months). The cumulative risk of HCC occurrence was 7.9% at 1 year and 36.0% at 3 years. The presence of coexistent HCC (hazard ratio [HR], 4.975; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.729-14.316; P = 0.003) and alpha-fetoprotein > 20 ng/mL (HR, 4.104; 95% CI, 1.621-10.392; P = 0.003) were significant factors for the risk of HCC occurrence. Fourteen of these lesions were diagnosed as HCCs that developed from iso-enhanced lesions. Cumulative HCC occurrence rates from PIEL > 14 mm was 23.5% at 1 year and 46.3% at 3 years. Cox regression analysis showed that PIEL > 14 mm (HR, 6.780; 95% CI, 2.060-22.32; P = 0.002) and alpha-fetoprotein > 20 ng/mL (HR, 4.892; 95% CI, 1.559-15.350; P = 0.007) were statistically significant factors for HCC occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with coexistent HCC, alpha-fetoprotein > 20 ng/mL, or PIEL > 14 mm should be carefully monitored because of the high potential for HCC occurrence.

Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in follow-up assessment after ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) during follow-up after percutaneous ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS: A total of 141 patients with HCCs who received percutaneous ablation therapy were assessed by paired follow-up CEUS and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). The follow-up scheme was designed prospectively and the intervals between CEUS and CECT examinations were less than 14 d. Both images of follow-up CEUS and CECT were reviewed by radiologists. The ablated lesions were evaluated and classified as local tumor progression (LTP) and LTP-free. LTP was defined as regrowth of tumor inside or adjacent to the successfully treated nodule. The detected new intrahepatic recurrences were also evaluated and defined as presence of intrahepatic new foci. On CEUS and CECT, LTP and new intrahepatic recurrence both were displayed as typical enhancement pattern of HCC (i.e., hyper-enhancing during the arterial phase and washout in the late phase). With CECT as the reference standard, the ability of CEUS in detecting LTP or new intrahepatic recurrence during follow-up was evaluated.

RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 1-31 mo (median, 4 mo), 169 paired CEUS and CECT examinations were carried out for the 141 patients. For a total of 221 ablated lesions, 266 comparisons between CEUS and CECT findings were performed. Thirty-three LTPs were detected on CEUS whereas 40 LTPs were detected on CECT, there was significant difference (P < 0.001). In comparison with CECT, the numbers of false positive and false negative LTPs detected on CEUS were 6 and 13, respectively; the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy of CEUS in detecting LTPs were 67.5%, 97.4%, 81.8%, 94.4% and 92.3%, respectively. Meanwhile, 131 new intrahepatic recurrent foci were detected on CEUS whereas 183 were detected on CECT, there was also significant difference (P < 0.05). In comparison with CECT, the numbers of false positive and false negative intrahepatic recurrences detected on CEUS were 13 and 65, respectively; the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and overall accuracy of CEUS in detecting new intrahepatic recurrent foci were 77.7%, 92.0%, 92.4%, 76.7% and 84.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of CEUS in detecting LTP and new intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous ablation therapy is relatively low in comparison with CECT.

Linear enhancement after radio-frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: is it a sign of recurrence?

This prospective study was performed in 179 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions treated by radio-frequency ablation (RFA) to explore the clinical outcome of "linear enhancement" on contrast-enhanced sonogram. Thirty-three lesions (18.4%) showed linear enhancement, a linear-shaped positive enhancement in the RFA-treated area. Seventeen of them were followed up with no treatment (remaining 16; dropout in eight, additional RFA in six and ineffective treatment in two) and three lesions (3/17, 17.6%) showed local tumor progression corresponding to linear enhancement at 7, 14, 19 months after RFA. Although there was no significant difference in local recurrence rate between the lesions with (3/17) and without linear enhancement (10/35), local tumor progression inside the ablation zone occurred only in the lesions with linear enhancement. In conclusion, linear enhancement inside the RFA-treated area should be followed up within 7 months because it has a risk of local tumor progression. Histology of linear enhancement and its influence on distant recurrence remain to be solved.

Advances in oncologic imaging: update on 5 common cancers

Imaging has become a pivotal component throughout a patient's encounter with cancer, from initial disease detection and characterization through treatment response assessment and posttreatment follow-up. Recent progress in imaging technology has presented new opportunities for improving clinical care. This article provides updates on the latest approaches to imaging of 5 common cancers: breast, lung, prostate, and colorectal cancers, and lymphoma.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abdominal imaging

The administration of a contrast agent is considered an essential tool to evaluate abdominal diseases using Ultrasound. The most targeted organ is the liver, especially to characterize focal liver lesions and to assess the response to percutaneous treatment. However, the expanding abdominal indications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound make this technique an important tool in the assessment of organ perfusion including the evaluation of ischemic, traumatic, and inflammatory diseases.

Comparison of Kupffer-phase Sonazoid-enhanced sonography and hepatobiliary-phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma and correlation with histologic grading

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative wash-out of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules using Kupffer-phase sonography with Sonazoid (Daiichi-Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan) enhancement and hepatobiliary-phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of the histopathologic grades of individual nodules.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 66 consecutive patients with 78 histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules. In patients with carcinomas, 33 were well differentiated; 29 were moderately differentiated; and 11 were poorly differentiated; and there were 5 dysplastic nodules. All patients underwent both gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and Sonazoid-enhanced sonography. The interval between the two imaging examinations was less than 30 days. Six radiologists independently reviewed both images and rated the degree of relative wash-out between the tumorous and nontumorous areas on Kupffer- and hepatobiliary-phase images using a continuous rating scale. We compared these results with the histopathologic grade of each nodule, and the results were then analyzed with multireader multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The average Kupffer-phase (P < .001) and hepatobiliary-phase (P = .004) rating scores increased as the carcinomas became less differentiated (Kruskal-Wallis test). The diagnostic accuracies of the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, which were estimated using the confidence levels of the relative wash-out of the Kupffer- and hepatobiliary-phase images, were 0.705 and 0.785 for dysplastic nodules versus well-, moderately, and poorly differentiated carcinomas (P = .517), 0.791 and 0.687 for dysplastic nodules and well-differentiated carcinomas versus moderately and poorly differentiated carcinomas (P = .093), and 0.871 and 0.716 for dysplastic nodules and well-and moderately differentiated carcinomas versus poorly differentiated carcinomas (P = .005), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Kupffer-phase Sonazoid-enhanced sonography and hepatobiliary-phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may be useful in estimating the histologic grade, although Kupffer-phase Sonazoid-enhanced sonography may be more accurate in distinguishing hepatocellular carcinomas, especially moderately and poorly differentiated types.