Malignancy risk and characteristics of thyroid nodules with two consecutive results of atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance on cytology

Utility of Six Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems in the Diagnosis of AUS/FLUS Thyroid Nodules

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To estimate the diagnostic performance of the currently used ultrasound (US)-based risk stratification systems (RSSs) (American Thyroid Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Association Medici Endocrinology Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules, European Thyroid Association Guidelines for Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules in Adults [EU-TIRADS], American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [ACR-TIRADS], Chinese Guidelines for Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules [C-TIRADS], and Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Developed by Kwak et al [Kwak-TIRADS]) for atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) thyroid nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 514 consecutive AUS/FLUS nodules in 481 patients with final diagnosis. The US characteristics were reviewed and classified using the categories defined by each RSS. The diagnostic performance was evaluated and compared using a generalized estimating equation method.

RESULTS

Of the 514 AUS/FLUS nodules, 148 (28.8%) were malignant and 366 (71.2%) were benign. The calculated malignancy rate increased from the low-risk to high-risk categories for all RSSs (all P < .001). Interobserver correlation for both US features and RSSs showed substantial to almost perfect agreement. The diagnostic efficacy of Kwak-TIRADS (AUC=0.808) and C-TIRADS (AUC=0.804) were similar (P = .721) and higher than those of other RSSs (all P < .05). The EU-TIRADS and Kwak-TIRADS exhibited similar sensitivity (86.5% vs 85.1%, P = .739) and were only higher than that of the C-TIRADS (all P < .05). The specificity of C-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS were similar (78.1% vs 72.1%, P = .06) and were higher than those of other RSSs (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Currently used RSSs can provide risk stratification for AUS/FLUS nodules. Kwak-TIRADS and C-TIRADS have the highest diagnostic efficacy in identifying malignant AUS/FLUS nodules. A detailed knowledge of the benefits and shortcomings of the various RSSs is essential.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound risk stratification systems on thyroid nodules cytologically classified as indeterminate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Ultrasound (US) risk stratification systems (RSSs) are increasingly being utilized for the optimal management of thyroid nodules, including those with indeterminate cytology. The goal of this study was to evaluate the category-based diagnostic performance of US RSSs in identifying malignancy in indeterminate nodules.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021266195). PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched through December 1, 2022. Original articles reporting data on the performance of US RSSs for indeterminate nodules were included. The numbers of nodules classified as true negative, true positive, false negative, and false positive were extracted.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies evaluating 7,225 indeterminate thyroid nodules were included. The diagnostic accuracy was quantitatively synthesized using a Bayesian bivariate model based on the integrated nested Laplace approximation in R. For the intermediate- to high-risk category, the sensitivity levels of the American College of Radiology, the American Thyroid Association, the European Thyroid Association, the Korean Thyroid Association/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology, and Kwak et al. were found to be 0.80, 0.72, 0.76, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. The corresponding specificity measurements were 0.36, 0.50, 0.49, 0.28, and 0.17. Furthermore, for the high-risk category, the sensitivity values were 0.40, 0.46, 0.55, 0.47, and 0.10, while the specificity levels were 0.91, 0.90, 0.71, 0.91, and 0.99, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The overall diagnostic performance of the US RSSs was moderate in the differentiation of indeterminate nodules.

An attempt to reduce unnecessary surgical procedures... Can ultrasound characteristics help in differentiating adenoma vs carcinoma in follicular thyroid neoplasms?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Thyroid nodules frequently require ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) evaluation. However, FNA cytology does not allow differentiation between follicular adenoma and carcinoma on Bethesda type IV lesions. This situation leads to many unnecessary surgical procedures because it is not possible to assure the benignity of the lesions, even when most of the specimens correspond to adenomas or even other benign lesions. The objective is this study is to establish if there are any US characteristics that would help us to predict the risk of malignancy of nodules with a pathological diagnosis of follicular neoplasm in order to achieve a more conservative management for non-suspicious nodules.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied 61 nodules in 61 patients (51 women and 10 men) that underwent thyroid surgery and had histopathological results of either follicular adenoma or carcinoma. Different US characteristics of the nodules were analysed (composition, echogenicity, margin, calcification status, the presence of halo and overall observer suspicion of malignancy) and were correlated with the histopathological analysis.

RESULTS

We have found a statistically significant association between the presence of calcifications, ill-defined borders and overall observer suspicion or impression (defined by well-known suspicious for malignancy ultrasonographic features, such as calcification, poorly defined margin, and a markedly hypoechoic solid nodule; and benign ultrasonographic features, such as predominantly cystic echogenic composition and the presence of a perinodular hypoechogenic halo) with follicular carcinoma. However all those features have shown low sensitivities in the present study (30%, 30% and 50%, respectively). On the other hand, the absence of halo sign has shown a sensitivity of 100% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of calcifications, ill-defined borders and the overall impression or suspicion of malignancy associate with a higher risk for follicular carcinoma in Bethesda type IV thyroid nodules but their absence do not allow to predict benignity in these nodules. Inversely, when a halo sign lesion is observed, benign follicular neoplasm should be considered.

The impact of thyroid imaging reporting and data system on the management of Bethesda III thyroid nodules

Objectives

Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) is a heterogeneous category of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC); the management of this condition remains controversial. The clinical significance of such patients relies on the exclusion of malignancy. In this study, we aimed to determine the validity of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) (2017) for predicting malignancy in this specific category of patients.

Methods

In this study, we analysed a cohort of patients from our previous retrospective study. This four-year retrospective cohort study included all cases undergoing surgery with a cytological diagnosis of AUS/FLUS. We enrolled 110 cases with documented final histopathological diagnoses and ultrasound examinations.

Results

The study included 83 females (75.5%) and 27 males (24.5%). The overall risk of malignancy (ROM) for AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules was 47.3%. The ROMs of TI-RADS 3 (TR3), TI-RADS 4 (TR4), and TI-RADS 5 (TR5) were 43.5%, 49.4% and 40%, respectively. There was no significant association between TI-RADS and final pathological analysis.

Conclusions

Repeated FNAC with initial AUS/FLUS nodules is crucial. Our findings showed that ACR TI-RADS did not contribute to the cancer risk stratification of AUS/FLUS nodules. A large prospective multi-institutional study is now required to determine the validity of ACR TI-RADS and whether other adjunct clinical, cytological, molecular, or biochemical tools could facilitate the management of patients with these heterogeneous nodules.

Optimization of the Management of Category III Thyroid Nodules Using Repeat FNA and TIRADS

The aim of the study was to examine the benefits of the joint use of repeat FNA (rFNA) and EU-TIRADS in category III nodules in relation to the kind of atypia: nuclear vs. architectural (denoted by AUS and FLUS respectively). The study included 127 AUS and 1739 FLUS nodules with a known category of EU-TIRADS. Repeat FNA was performed in 82 AUS and 934 FLUS nodules of which 57 and 515 were excised, respectively. AUS nodules had higher malignancy risk than FLUS nodules. EU-TIRADS showed higher accuracy for AUS nodules, the opposite to rFNA, that had higher accuracy for FLUS nodules. The combined criterion for AUS nodules (at least rFNA-V or EU-TIRADS-4) maximized sensitivity (92.3%) with acceptable specificity (70.0%); OR: 28.0. In the case of FLUS nodules, the combined criterion (rFNA-V or EU-TIRADS-5) maximized specificity (95.2%) with 57.7% sensitivity and a low percentage (13.9%) of positive nodules, OR: 27.0. In both types of nodules, the low risk category in EU-TIRADS and benign result of rFNA excluded cancer. Concluding, category III nodules with and without nuclear atypia differ in their risk of malignancy and, consequently, diagnostic criteria adopted for the evaluation of these nodules with rFNA and EU-TIRADS should be specific to AUS and FLUS nodules.

Hashimoto's Thyroiditis Does Not Influence the Malignancy Risk in Nodules of Category III in the Bethesda System

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of malignancy (RoM) in category III thyroid nodules of the Bethesda system in patients with and without Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) and to analyze whether obtaining category III with a repeat FNA (rFNA) increases RoM. The study included 563 HT and 1250 non-HT patients; rFNA was performed in 349 and 575 patients, and surgical treatment in 160 and 390, respectively. There was no difference in RoM between HT and non-HT patients in the whole examined population (lower limit of RoM), nor in operated patients (upper limit of RoM), HT: 5.0−17.5%, non-HT: 4.7−15.1%. RoM in patients with AUS nodules (with nuclear atypia) was similar in both groups (HT: 21.7−40.0%, non-HT: 16.9−41.4%), as it was in patients with FLUS nodules (with architectural atypia) (HT: 3.5−13.3%, non-HT: 4.0−13.0%). In patients from both groups together, with category III diagnosed twice and AUS identified at least once, RoM was 16.7−50.0% and it was higher than that in patients with FLUS nodule diagnosed twice: 3.2−13.0% (p < 0.005). Concluding, RoM in category III nodules is not affected by the presence of HT. Subcategorization of category III nodules (FLUS vs. AUS) may provide guidance toward further follow-up or surgery in both groups.

Atypia and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance in Subsequent Biopsy Result: What Clinicians Need to Know

Atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is the most controversial category of The Bethesda System. The risk of malignancy (ROM) in this group is estimated as 5–15%, however, the occurrence of two or more subsequent biopsy results with AUS/FLUS diagnosis makes these clinical situations more complex. We evaluated the ROM and prognostic value of aggressive ultrasound (US) features in 342 patients with thyroid nodules (TNs) with subsequent biopsy results of AUS/FLUS. We assessed US features and compared them with the final histopathological diagnosis. Overall, 121 (35.4%) individuals after first AUS/FLUS diagnosis underwent surgery and 221 (64.6%) patients had repeated biopsies. The ROM after first, second, and third biopsies with subsequent AUS/FLUS diagnosis were 7.4%, 18.5%, and 38.4% respectively. We demonstrated significantly higher rates of occurrence of aggressive US features in patients with malignancy (p < 0.0001). The age <55 years old was also a significant risk factor for TC (p = 0.044). Significant associations were found between aggressive US features and malignancy in patients after first diagnosis of AUS/FLUS (p < 0.05). The juxtaposition of US features with the number of biopsy repetitions of TN with consecutive AUS/FLUS diagnoses may simplify the decision-making process in surgical management. Two or three consecutive biopsy results with AUS/FLUS diagnosis increases the ROM.

The value of repeating fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is an invaluable technique used in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the concordance of results for consecutive FNA readings.

DESIGN

Retrospective, descriptive.

SETTINGS

Two tertiary care centers.

METHODS

Demographics were collected along with every FNA result and final pathology results for all patients (aged 9-90 years old) who underwent thyroid surgery from 2010 to 2017. The Bethesda system was used for cytology. Agreement levels were calculated and compared with final pathology.

SAMPLE SIZE

Of 1237 initially included, 1134 had at least one FNA performed with results available for review.

RESULTS

For the 1134 patients, demographic and clinical data were collection and a comparison was made between the three FNA results; the highest agreement was between FNA 2 and 3 (53.6%); however, the kappa value was consistently low for all comparisons, indicating a poor level of agreement overall. Also, the risk of malignancy was higher in this study than in the 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in FNA cytology categories I and II.

CONCLUSION

Repeating FNA biopsies yield different results every time; hence, there is a low level of agreement. The clinical decision should therefore include other important risk factors. Prospective studies could help shed more light on this topic.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

An attempt to reduce unnecessary surgical procedures... Can ultrasound characteristics help in differentiating adenoma vs carcinoma in follicular thyroid neoplasms?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Thyroid nodules frequently require ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) evaluation. However, FNA cytology does not allow differentiation between follicular adenoma and carcinoma on Bethesda type IV lesions. This situation leads to many unnecessary surgical procedures because it is not possible to assure the benignity of the lesions, even when most of the specimens correspond to adenomas or even other benign lesions. The objective in this study is to establish if there are any US characteristics that would help us to predict the risk of malignancy of nodules with a pathological diagnosis of follicular neoplasm in order to achieve a more conservative management for non-suspicious nodules.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied 61 nodules in 61 patients (51 women and 10 men) that underwent thyroid surgery and had histopathological results of either follicular adenoma or carcinoma. Different US characteristics of the nodules were analysed (composition, echogenicity, margin, calcification status, the presence of halo and overall observer suspicion of malignancy) and were correlated with the histopathological analysis.

RESULTS

We have found a statistically significant association between the presence of calcifications, ill-defined borders and overall observer suspicion or impression (defined by well-known suspicious for malignancy ultrasonographic features, such as calcification, poorly defined margin, and a markedly hypoechoic solid nodule; and benign ultrasonographic features, such as predominantly cystic echogenic composition and the presence of a perinodular hypoechogenic halo) with follicular carcinoma. However all those features have shown low sensitivities in the present study (30%, 30% and 50%, respectively). On the other hand, the absence of halo sign has shown a sensitivity of 100% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of calcifications, ill-defined borders and the overall impression or suspicion of malignancy are associated with a higher risk for follicular carcinoma in Bethesda type IV thyroid nodules but their absence does not allow to predict benignity in these nodules. Inversely, when a halo sign lesion is observed, benign follicular neoplasm should be considered.

Strategy to reduce unnecessary surgeries in thyroid nodules with cytology of Bethesda category III (AUS/FLUS): a retrospective analysis of 667 patients diagnosed by surgery

PURPOSE

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is widely used for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules detected by ultrasonography. However, the cytology of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) often leads to unnecessary thyroid surgery. This study aimed to identify a strategy to reduce unnecessary surgeries in patients with AUS/FLUS nodules.

METHODS

Medical records of 667 patients with the cytology of AUS/FLUS who underwent surgery from January 2007 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological data were analyzed to identify malignant factors in thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS. Factors were compared between patients with thyroid cancer and those with benign thyroid nodules, using stepwise multivariate logistic regression and decision tree model.

RESULTS

Pathological thyroid cancer was identified in 193 (43.3%) patients. There was a significant difference in malignancy incidence with respect to family history, number of nodules, number of FNAs, ultrasonographic finding, lymphocytic thyroiditis, and BRAFV600E mutation. Multivariate analysis showed that ultrasonography (K-TIRADS 5) was the most influential independent predictor of malignancy in AUS/FLUS (odds ratio = 11.02, p < 0.001), followed by possessing BRAFV600E mutation (odds ratio = 4.54, p < 0.001). This strategy enabled 226 (89.3%) patients to avoid unnecessary surgeries based on the decision tree model. There was no node of repeated FNA in the decision tree model, which reduced the risk of malignancy (odds ratio = 0.35, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

K-TIRADS 5 and BRAFV600E mutation were predictive of malignancy in nodules of AUS/FLUS. These factors should be considered in strategies to reduce unnecessary surgeries for AUS/FLUS.

Diagnostic Value of Six Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS) in Cytologically Equivocal Thyroid Nodules

The aim was to compare the usefulness of selected thyroid sonographic risk-stratification systems in the diagnostics of nodules with indeterminate/suspicious cytology or unequivocal cytology in a population with a history of iodine deficiency. The diagnostic efficacy of ACR-TIRADS (the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems), EU-TIRADS (European Thyroid Association TIRADS), Korean-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, AACE/ACE-AME-guidelines (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/ American College of Endocrinology-Associazione Medici Endocrinologi guidelines) and ATA-guidelines (American Thyroid Association guidelines) was evaluated in 1000 nodules with determined histopathological diagnosis: 329 FLUS/AUS (10.6% cancers), 167 SFN/SHT (11.6% cancers), 44 SM (77.3% cancers), 298 BL (benign lesions), 162 MN (malignant neoplasms). The percentage of PTC (papillary thyroid carcinoma) among cancers was higher in Bethesda MN (86.4%) and SM (suspicion of malignancy) nodules (91.2%) than in FLUS/AUS (57.1%, p < 0.005) and SFN/SHT (suspicion of follicular neoplasm/ suspicion of Hürthle cell tumor) nodules (36.8%, p < 0.001). TIRADS efficacy was higher for MN (AUC: 0.827-0.874) and SM nodules (AUC: 0.775-0.851) than for FLUS/AUS (AUC: 0.655-0.701) or SFN/SHT nodules (AUC: 0.593-0.621). FLUS/AUS (follicular lesion of undetermined significance/ atypia of undetermined significance) nodules assigned to a high risk TIRADS category had malignancy risk of 25%. In the SFN/SHT subgroup none TIRADS category changed nodule's malignancy risk. EU-TIRADS and AACE/ACE-AME-guidelines would allow diagnosing the highest number of PTC, FTC (follicular thyroid carcinoma), HTC (Hürthle cell carcinoma), MTC (medullary thyroid carcinoma). The highest OR value was for Kwak-TIRADS (12.6) and Korean-TIRADS (12.0). Conclusions: TIRADS efficacy depends on the incidence of PTC among cancers. All evaluated TIRADS facilitate the selection of FLUS/AUS nodules for the surgical treatment but these systems are not efficient in the management of SFN/SHT nodules.

Usage and Diagnostic Yield of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy in Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature Published by Korean Authors

Objectives

The usefulness of core needle biopsy (CNB) for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules remains controversial, and preferences vary across hospitals. The purpose of this study was to assess the actual use of CNB in Korea and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of CNB through a systematic review and meta-analysis of papers published by Korean authors.

Methods

A meta-analysis of full-text publications published in English presenting data from Korea retrieved from the Embase literature database was performed.

Results

CNB led to a significantly lower proportion of non-diagnostic results than fine-needle aspiration (FNA). However, the frequency of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) did not decrease as a result of performing CNB in nodules with initial AUS/FLUS results, while it increased in consecutive cases. A subcategory analysis of AUS/FLUS showed that the increased frequency of AUS/FLUS findings on CNB was due to more frequent diagnoses of architectural atypia and follicular neoplasm, which resulted in a higher frequency of inconclusive findings in consecutive cases compared to FNA. Hospitals favoring CNB had a higher proportion of AUS/FLUS diagnoses. Although the complication rate did not differ significantly between CNB and FNA, serious complications of CNB did occur.

Conclusion

A reduced frequency of non-diagnostic results may be a definite advantage of CNB over FNA. However, the increased frequency of diagnoses of architectural atypia and follicular neoplasm should be considered when selecting CNB as a diagnostic tool.

Predictors for malignancy risk in subcentimeter thyroid nodules categorized as atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance by fine needle aspiration

Little work has been done on the prediction of malignancy risk in patients with subcentimeter thyroid nodule (TN) categorized as atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS). We performed a retrospective analysis on the medical records of subcentimeter TNs whose initial fine-needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis was AUS/FLUS at our center between November 2013 and August 2018. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to select independent factors associated with malignancy. Of the 324 patients who were classified as AUS/FLUS on initial FNA, 153 patients underwent surgical procedures and showed an associated malignancy rate of 45.10% (69/153). The malignancy rates in AUS/FLUS settings with and without repeat FNA were 38.30% (18/47), and 48.11% (51/106), respectively, p = 0.260. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age < 55 (OR 3.015, 95% CI 1.196-7.596), microcalcification (OR 9.162, 95% CI 3.332-25.916) and taller than wide shape (OR 10.785, 95% CI 4.108-28.319) were three independent predictors for malignancy. The malignancy rates in the patients with one or none of predictor and patients with two or three above predictors were 20.5% (17/83) and 74.3% (52/70), respectively, p < 0.001 (OR 11.216, 95% CI 5.266-23.885). In conclusion, our study showed that for subcentimeter TNs with AUS/FLUS category, patient's age, taller than wide shape and microcalcification were three independent predictive factors for malignancy, which was helpful for decision-making of surgery or observation in such patient population.

Ultrasound characteristics of thyroid nodules facilitate interpretation of the malignant risk of Bethesda system III/IV thyroid nodules and inform therapeutic schedule

Background

This study was designed to explore whether ultrasound of thyroid nodules facilitates the interpretation of the malignant risk of Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules to inform further therapies.

Methods

We reviewed patient records in which the results of ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (US‐FNA) were classified by the Bethesda III/IV in our institution between January 2016 and June 2018. Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Science, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and Chinese VIP. The odds ratio (OR) was used to measure associations between risk factors and thyroid nodule malignancy.

Results

Fifty‐nine cases of Bethesda III/IV with corresponding surgeries were included, and the malignancy risk was 54.2%. Meta‐analysis revealed irregular borders, solitary nodules, hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, and being taller than wide, all of which increased the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. Combined ORs for these factors were 4.08 (95% CI: 2.34‐7.14, P < .001), 2.18 (95% CI: 1.39‐3.42, P = .001), 2.02 (95% CI: 1.35‐3.01, P = .001), 3.21 (95% CI: 2.26‐4.56, P < .001), and 4.35 (95% CI: 3.07‐6.15, P < .001), respectively.

Conclusion

As the risk of malignancy for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is high, when any one of the five ultrasound features of malignancy were confirmed, repeated FNA is recommended to confirm PTC‐type malignancy, even though nodules were Bethesda III/IV classification. However, repeated FNA should be avoided when none of these ultrasound features are identified because repeated FNA does not contribute to identifying non‐PTC type malignancies, such as follicular thyroid carcinoma and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

WHICH FACTORS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH MALIGNANCY IN THYROID NODULES CLASSIFIED AS BETHESDA CATEGORY 3 (AUS/FLUS) AND HOW DO THEY INFLUENCE THE PATIENT'S MANAGEMENT?

Background

Thyroid nodules are a common pathology worldwide. Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is an important diagnostic method for the investigation of malignancy in thyroid nodules. However, according to the Bethesda System used to classify the results, patients with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS / FLUS) may not be classified as benign or malignant. Therefore, it may be necessary to determine some clinical risk factors to apply the best treatment in these patients.

Aim

To determine the factors that increase the risk of malignancy in this patient group.

Methods

A retrospective study including 138 patients with an FNAB categorized as AUS/FLUS and operated between June 2015-September 2018. Demographical, Laboratory (TSH) and Ultrasound variables (number, size and characteristics of nodules) of the patients were compared among postoperative histopathological results.

Results

Hypo-echoic structure, microcalcification and irregular margin of the nodules were detected to be associated with malignancy in patients with FNAB results of AUS/FLUS (p <0.001).

Conclusion

We suggest that surgical treatment should be considered if the patients have nodules with the hypo-echoic structure, microcalcification and irregular margin with an FNAB histopathological result of AUS / FLUS.

Diagnostic Utility of Molecular and Imaging Biomarkers in Cytological Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Indeterminate thyroid cytology (Bethesda III and IV) corresponds to follicular-patterned benign and malignant lesions, which are particularly difficult to differentiate on cytology alone. As ~25% of these nodules harbor malignancy, diagnostic hemithyroidectomy is still custom. However, advanced preoperative diagnostics are rapidly evolving.This review provides an overview of additional molecular and imaging diagnostics for indeterminate thyroid nodules in a preoperative clinical setting, including considerations regarding cost-effectiveness, availability, and feasibility of combining techniques. Addressed diagnostics include gene mutation analysis, microRNA, immunocytochemistry, ultrasonography, elastosonography, computed tomography, sestamibi scintigraphy, [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.The best rule-out tests for malignancy were the Afirma® gene expression classifier and FDG-PET. The most accurate rule-in test was sole BRAF mutation analysis. No diagnostic had both near-perfect sensitivity and specificity, and estimated cost-effectiveness. Molecular techniques are rapidly advancing. However, given the currently available techniques, a multimodality stepwise approach likely offers the most accurate diagnosis, sequentially applying one sensitive rule-out test and one specific rule-in test. Geographical variations in cytology (e.g., Hürthle cell neoplasms) and tumor genetics strongly influence local test performance and clinical utility. Multidisciplinary collaboration and implementation studies can aid the local decision for one or more eligible diagnostics.

Malignancy Risk and Related Factors of Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance in Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) in thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a challenging category. The malignancy risk is different by multiple factors and subsequent management strategy is inconclusive. Therefore, we analyzed the malignancy risk of AUS/FLUS according to radiological and clinical features. A total of 687 nodules that had been initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS were retrospectively reviewed from 6365 thyroid FNAs between 2011 and 2014. The ultrasonographic (US) features were categorized using the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. Radiological and clinical features were compared according to the second FNA results or histologically confirmed results from surgery. Repeat FNA was performed on 248 (36%) nodules, and 49 (7%) nodules underwent immediate surgery. Among the 248 nodules subjected to repeated FNA, 49 (20%) nodules were diagnosed again as AUS/FLUS, 123 (50%) were found to be benign, and 47 (19%) were diagnosed as follicular neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy or malignant. Among histologically confirmed nodules, the US features were more unfavorable in malignant nodules, and hypo- or anechogenicity was associated with a higher risk of malignancy after adjusting for age, size, and other US features (P < 0.01). In conclusion, we observed that malignant nodules tended to show unfavorable US features, especially hypo- or anechogenicity. Age, sex, and thyroid function were not significantly associated with malignancy risk. We also found out that malignancy risk was not different between the group which underwent immediate operation following the AUS/FLUS diagnosis and the group which underwent repeated FNA after the initial diagnosis.

Cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: increased diagnostic performance with combination of US TI-RADS and a new scoring system

To investigate the diagnostic performance of combination of ultrasound (US) thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) and a new US scoring system for diagnosing thyroid nodules (TNs) with indeterminate results (Bethesda categories III, IV and V) on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. 453 patients with 453 cytologically indeterminate TNs were included in this study. Multivariate analyses were performed to construct the scoring system. The diagnostic performances of TI-RADS and the combined method were evaluated and compared. Multivariate analyses revealed that marked hypoechogenicity, taller than wide shape and absence of halo sign were independent predictors for malignancy in cytologically indeterminate TNs. Scoring system was thereafter defined as follows: risk score (RS) = 3.2 x (if marked hypoechogenicity) + 2.8 x (if taller than wide shape) + 1.3 x (if absence of halo sign). Compared with TI-RADS alone, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value (PPV) of the combined method increased significantly with 0.731 versus 0.569, 48.5% versus 14.1%, 76.2% versus 62.3%, and 70.9% versus 59.9%, respectively (all P < 0.05). The combination of TI-RADS and new US scoring system showed superior diagnostic performances in predicting malignant TNs with indeterminate FNA cytology results in comparison with TI-RADS alone.

Thyroid nodules classified as atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance deserve further research: Analysis of 305 surgically confirmed nodules

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to determine the malignancy risk for nodules categorised as atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) and to investigate the predictors of malignancy.

METHODS

All nodules diagnosed as AUS/FLUS on fine needle aspiration (FNAs) performed between January 2011 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data, ultrasonographic features, follow-up data and the final pathological results were recorded. After further exclusion, only nodules that underwent surgical excision were included in the final analysis. The malignancy rate and the range of malignancy rates were calculated. Clinical and ultrasound features were examined to determine the predictors of malignancy.

RESULTS

During the study period, FNA was performed on 9938 nodules, and 1019 (10.2%) nodules were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. After further exclusion, 976 nodules were evaluated. After the initial diagnosis of AUS/FLUS, 139 (14.2%) patients underwent surgery, 518 (53.1%) had repeated FNAs. A total of 305 (31%) had undergone surgical excision at different time points. For surgically confirmed nodules, the malignancy rate after the initial FNA was 34.5% (the lower and upper thresholds for the malignancy rate were 19.3% and 66.3%, respectively), and 37.9% after the repeated FNA. No ultrasound feature was determined as a predictor, whereas age (>55 years) was a predictor for malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall malignancy rate for nodules diagnosed as AUS/FLUS and the malignancy rate for nodules that underwent repeated FNA after AUS/FLUS were higher than the expected malignancy rates of the National Cancer Institute. It is, therefore, suggested that the current recommendations should be reconsidered.

Comparison of risk of malignancy in a subgroup with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As heterogeneous findings are included in the atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) category, differing risks of malignancy in subgroups have been reported in several articles.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of full-text publications written in English found in the Embase and PubMed databases.

RESULTS

The 4-tiered subgroup proportion meta-analysis showed that the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the risk of malignancy in the cellular atypia group did not overlap with the other 3 subgroups and demonstrated a significant difference. Two-tiered analysis using the cytologic and architectural atypia groups showed that cytologic atypia group had a 2.64-fold increase in the risk of malignancy compared with the architectural atypia group.

CONCLUSION

The cytologic atypia had a significantly higher risk of malignancy than the architectural atypia group, and it should be considered as a separate category.

Ultrasound is helpful to differentiate Bethesda class III thyroid nodules: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the most dependable tool to triage thyroid nodules for medical or surgical management. However, Bethesda class III cytology, namely "follicular lesion of undetermined significance" (FLUS) or "atypia of undetermined significance" (AUS), is a major limitation of the US-FNA in assessing thyroid nodules. As the most important imaging method, ultrasound (US) has a high efficacy in diagnosing thyroid nodules. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the role of US in evaluating Bethesda class III thyroid nodules.

METHODS

With keywords "Undetermined Significance," "Bethesda Category III," "Bethesda system," "Cytological Subcategory," "AUS/FLUS," "Atypia of Undetermined Significance," and "Ultrasound/US," papers in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar from inception to December 2016 were searched. A meta-analysis of these trials was then performed for evaluating the diagnostic value of thyroid ultrasound in Bethesda Category III thyroid nodules.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including 2405 nodules were analyzed. According to the criteria for US diagnosis of thyroid nodules in each article, with any one of suspicious features as indictors of malignancy, US had a pooled sensitivity of 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.78) and a pooled specificity of 0.48 (95% CI 0.45-0.50) in evaluating Bethesda Class III Nodules. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 10.92 (95% CI 6.04-19.74). The overall area under the curve was 0.84 and the Q* index was 0.77. With any 2 or 3 of US suspicious features as indictors of malignancy, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.83) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.51-0.58), 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.73) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.68-0.74), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

US was helpful for differentiating benign and malignant Bethesda class III thyroid nodules, with the more suspicious features, the more likely to be malignant.

Malignancy rate in thyroid nodules categorized as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance - An institutional experience

Introduction:

Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) of Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology has emerged as most controversial category due to its heterogeneity and inconsistent usage. Initially associated risk of malignancy was estimated to be about 5–15%, but eventually different results have been obtained across institutions due to variable follow-ups and interpretation. The present study was conducted to evaluate the rate of malignancy along with appropriate management in this category.

Materials and Methods:

The study included AUS/FLUS cases diagnosed over period of 4 years on thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Detailed clinical history and radiological examination were recorded along with follow-ups and management of all cases. Histopathology was available for cases which underwent surgery due to high clinical suspicion, worrisome radiological features or two consecutive AUS/FLUS reports.

Results:

The incidence of AUS/FLUS was 6.4% with repeat FNAC done in 39.6%, immediate surgery in 49.2% and follow-up without intervention in 11.1% cases. The overall malignancy rate was 28.5% with most common malignancy being follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (FVPC). Malignancy rate was more in cases (24.1%) which morphologically showed atypical nuclear features in comparison to architectural atypia.

Conclusion:

AUS/FLUS is associated with higher risk of malignancy than previously anticipated. Surgical intervention may have greater implication than repeat FNAC in appropriate management of this category. Substratification of this category according to nuclear features and architecture may be more useful in predicting malignancy risk and reducing the variability in the group.

The predictive value of sonographic images of follicular lesions - a comparison with nodules unequivocal in FNA - single centre prospective study

BACKGROUND

To determine the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonographic malignancy risk features (UMRFs) in follicular lesions (FL) in a population with low risk of malignancy in FL and to compare it with a similar analysis in a group of patients with unequivocal cytology (UC): benign lesion (BL) or malignant neoplasm (MN).

METHODS

Presence of UMRFs (hypoechogenicity, solid echostructure, taller-than-wide shape, pathological vascularization, irregular margins, microcalcifications and macrocalcifications) and their sets were assessed in 322 FL: 202 follicular lesions of undetermined significance (FLUS) and 120 suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN) and 300 nodules with UC: 200 BL and 100 MN, subsequently evaluated histopathologically.

RESULTS

Cancers were confirmed in 100% nodules in MN group (89.0% of them were papillary carcinomas - PTC), in 6.4% FLUS nodules (69.2% PTC), and in 10.8% SFN nodules (30.8% PTC). In the UC group all UMRFs occurred more frequently in cancers than in benign lesions. In the FL group only calcifications were found in cancers more frequently - macro and microcalcifications together: 34.6 vs. 11.5% (p = 0.001) and isolated macrocalcifications: 26.0 vs. 6.8% (p = 0.001); the presence of those features increased the basic risk of malignancy in FL more than 2 times. The presence of at least 2 of the following URMFs: hypoechogenicity, solid echostructure, any type of calcifications and suspected shape, additionally improved sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of UMRFs in FLs is less effective than in nodules with UC, and its effectiveness decreases parallel to the decrease in percentage of PTCs among malignant neoplasms and to the increase of the percentage of adenomas among benign nodules. The presence of macrocalcifications in such FLs significantly increases the basic risk of malignancy in these nodules.

The 5-tiered categorization system for reporting cytology is sufficient for management of patients with thyroid nodules compared to the 6-tiered Bethesda system

To analyze whether the 5-tiered categorization system without the atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) category is sufficient compared to the 6-tiered Bethesda system. This IRB-approved retrospective study was waived informed consent. The pre-Bethesda period was from March 2008 to December 2008 and the Bethesda period was from January 2012 to January 2013. Of 4677 nodules ≥10 mm with initial ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration, 2553 nodules were from the pre-Bethesda period and 1754 nodules were from the Bethesda period. The utilization and malignancy rates of each category were compared between the two periods. The utilization rate of the benign category decreased from 67.7 % in the pre-Bethesda period to 60.0 % in the Bethesda period (p = 0.001). In the pre-Bethesda period, the malignancy rates of the non-diagnostic, benign, suspicious follicular neoplasm/Hürthle cell neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy, and malignancy categories were 3.8, 1.9, 25, 78.8, and 99.7 %, respectively. The malignancy rate of the benign category decreased from 1.9 to 0.3 % after the Bethesda system (p < 0.001). The utilization and malignancy rates of the AUS/FLUS category were 7 and 22.8 %. When the AUS/FLUS category was included in the benign category, the malignancy rate became 2.6 % which was not significantly different from 1.9 % in the pre-Bethesda period (p = 0.189). The malignancy rates of other categories were not significantly different. The 5-tiered categorization system without the AUS/FLUS category for reporting cytology was sufficient for management of patients with thyroid nodules compared to the 6-tiered categorization of the Bethesda system.

Morphometric Analysis of Thyroid Follicular Cells with Atypia of Undetermined Significance

BACKGROUND

Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) is a category that encompasses a heterogeneous group of thyroid aspiration cytology. It has been reclassified into two subgroups based on the cytomorphologic features: AUS with cytologic atypia and AUS with architectural atypia. The nuclear characteristics of AUS with cytologic atypia need to be clarified by comparing to those observed in Hashimoto thyroiditis and benign follicular lesions.

METHODS

We selected 84 cases of AUS with histologic follow-up, 24 cases of Hashimoto thyroiditis, and 26 cases of benign follicular lesions. We also subcategorized the AUS group according to the follow-up biopsy results into a papillary carcinoma group and a nodular hyperplasia group. The differences in morphometric parameters, including the nuclear areas and perimeters, were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

The AUS group had significantly smaller nuclear areas than the Hashimoto thyroiditis group, but the nuclear perimeters were not statistically different. The AUS group also had significantly smaller nuclear areas than the benign follicular lesion group; however, the AUS group had significantly longer nuclear perimeters. The nuclear areas in the papillary carcinoma group were significantly smaller than those in the nodular hyperplasia group; however, the nuclear perimeters were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

We found the AUS group to be a heterogeneous entity, including histologic follow-up diagnoses of papillary carcinoma and nodular hyperplasia. The AUS group showed significantly greater nuclear irregularities than the other two groups. Utilizing these features, nuclear morphometry could lead to improvements in the accuracy of the subjective diagnoses made with thyroid aspiration cytology.

Core Needle Biopsy Is a More Conclusive Follow-up Method Than Repeat Fine Needle Aspiration for Thyroid Nodules with Initially Inconclusive Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background:

This study investigated the appropriate management of thyroid nodules with prior non-diagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods:

This study included 4,235 thyroid nodules from 26 eligible studies. We investigated the conclusive rate of follow-up core needle biopsy (CNB) or repeat fine needle aspiration (rFNA) after initial fine needle aspiration (FNA) with non-diagnostic or AUS/FLUS results. A diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) review was performed to determine the diagnostic role of the follow-up CNB and to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) on the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve.

Results:

The conclusive rates of follow-up CNB and rFNA after initial FNA were 0.879 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.801 to 0.929) and 0.684 (95% CI, 0.627 to 0.736), respectively. In comparison of the odds ratios of CNB and rFNA, CNB had more frequent conclusive results than rFNA (odds ratio, 5.707; 95% CI, 2.530 to 12.875). Upon subgroup analysis, follow-up CNB showed a higher conclusive rate than rFNA in both initial non-diagnostic and AUS/FLUS subgroups. In DTA review of followup CNB, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.97) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.91), respectively. The AUC for the SROC curve was 0.981, nearing 1.

Conclusions:

Our results show that CNB has a higher conclusive rate than rFNA when the initial FNA produced inconclusive results. Further prospective studies with more detailed criteria are necessary before follow-up CNB can be applied in daily practice.

Repeat fine-needle aspiration can be performed at 6 months or more after initial atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance results for thyroid nodules 10 mm or larger

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether repeat ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) in initial atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) results could be performed 6 months after or more.

METHODS

A total of 221 AUS/FLUS ≥10 mm with any follow-up were grouped according to the first follow-up interval at less than 6 months (group 1, n = 87) and 6 months or more (group 2, n = 134). Clinical features, final assessment of ultrasound (US) or the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS), tumour size, extrathyroidal extension and lymph node metastasis in malignancies were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-four (15.4 %) were malignant. Age, gender, size, final assessment, TIRADS and malignancy rate were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.660, 0.691, 0.502, 0.237, 0.819 and 0.420). Tumour size, extrathyroidal extension and lymph node metastasis were not significantly different between the two malignancy groups (p = 0.770, 0.611 and 0.068). Two of 10 nodules with increased size were malignancies found at 7.1 and 25.0 months. None of 33 nodules (14.9 %) with decreased size at a median 10 months were malignant.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat US-FNA performed on nodules ≥10 mm at 6 months or more after initial AUS/FLUS results can reduce unnecessary repeat US-FNAs without progression of malignancy.

KEY POINTS

• Follow-up intervals of AUS/FLUS did not affect the malignancy rate • Tumour stage was not different according to the follow-up intervals • None of the nodules with decreased size were malignant • Repeat US-FNA can be performed at ≥6 months after initial AUS/FLUS.