Different diagnostic values of imaging parameters to predict pseudoprogression in glioblastoma subgroups stratified by MGMT promoter methylation

Beyond conventional imaging: Advancements in MRI for glioma malignancy prediction and molecular profiling

This review examines the advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques and their pivotal role in diagnosing and managing gliomas, the most prevalent primary brain tumors. The paper underscores the importance of integrating modern MRI modalities, such as diffusion-weighted imaging and perfusion MRI, which are essential for assessing glioma malignancy and predicting tumor behavior. Special attention is given to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, emphasizing the integration of molecular diagnostics in glioma classification, significantly impacting treatment decisions. The review also explores radiogenomics, which correlates imaging features with molecular markers to tailor personalized treatment strategies. Despite technological progress, MRI protocol standardization and result interpretation challenges persist, affecting diagnostic consistency across different settings. Furthermore, the review addresses MRI's capacity to distinguish between tumor recurrence and pseudoprogression, which is vital for patient management. The necessity for greater standardization and collaborative research to harness MRI's full potential in glioma diagnosis and personalized therapy is highlighted, advocating for an enhanced understanding of glioma biology and more effective treatment approaches.

Potential of pre-operative MRI features in glioblastoma to predict for molecular stem cell subtype and patient overall survival

AIM OF THE STUDY

A molecular signature based on 10 mRNA abundances that characterizes the mesenchymal-to-proneural phenotype of glioblastoma stem(like) cells (GSCs) enriched in primary culture has been previously established. As this phenotype has been proposed to be prognostic for disease outcome the present study aims to identify features of the preoperative MR imaging that may predict the GSC phenotype of individual tumors.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Molecular mesenchymal-to-proneural mRNA signatures and intrinsic radioresistance (SF4, survival fraction at 4 Gy) of primary GSC-enriched cultures were associated with survival data and pre-operative MR imaging of the corresponding glioblastoma patients of a prospective cohort (n = 24). The analyzed imaging parameters comprised linear vectors derived from tumor volume, necrotic volume and edema as contoured manually.

RESULTS

A necrosis/tumor vector ratio and to a weaker extent the product of this ratio and the edema vector were identified to correlate with the mesenchymal-to-proneural mRNA signature and the SF4 of the patient-derived GSC cultures. Importantly, both parameter combinations were predictive for overall survival of the whole patient cohort. Moreover, the combination of necrosis/tumor vector ratio and edema vector differed significantly between uni- and multifocally recurring tumors.

CONCLUSION

Features of the preoperative MR images may reflect the molecular signature of the GSC population and might be used in the future as a prognostic factor and for treatment stratification especially in the MGMT promotor-unmethylated sub-cohort of glioblastoma patients.

Challenges and opportunities for advanced neuroimaging of glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive of glial tumours in adults. On conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, these tumours are observed as irregular enhancing lesions with areas of infiltrating tumour and cortical expansion. More advanced imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, MR spectroscopy and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging have found widespread application to diagnostic challenges in the setting of first diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up. This review aims to educate readers with regard to the strengths and weaknesses of the clinical application of these imaging techniques. For example, this review shows that the (semi)quantitative analysis of the mentioned advanced imaging tools was found useful for assessing tumour aggressiveness and tumour extent, and aids in the differentiation of tumour progression from treatment-related effects. Although these techniques may aid in the diagnostic work-up and (post-)treatment phase of glioblastoma, so far no unequivocal imaging strategy is available. Furthermore, the use and further development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools could greatly enhance neuroradiological practice by automating labour-intensive tasks such as tumour measurements, and by providing additional diagnostic information such as prediction of tumour genotype. Nevertheless, due to the fact that advanced imaging and AI-diagnostics is not part of response assessment criteria, there is no harmonised guidance on their use, while at the same time the lack of standardisation severely hampers the definition of uniform guidelines.

Beyond Imaging and Genetic Signature in Glioblastoma: Radiogenomic Holistic Approach in Neuro-Oncology

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant brain tumor exhibiting rapid and infiltrative growth, with less than 10% of patients surviving over 5 years, despite aggressive and multimodal treatments. The poor prognosis and the lack of effective pharmacological treatments are imputable to a remarkable histological and molecular heterogeneity of GBM, which has led, to date, to the failure of precision oncology and targeted therapies. Identification of molecular biomarkers is a paradigm for comprehensive and tailored treatments; nevertheless, biopsy sampling has proved to be invasive and limited. Radiogenomics is an emerging translational field of research aiming to study the correlation between radiographic signature and underlying gene expression. Although a research field still under development, not yet incorporated into routine clinical practice, it promises to be a useful non-invasive tool for future personalized/adaptive neuro-oncology. This review provides an up-to-date summary of the recent advancements in the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiogenomics for the assessment of molecular markers of interest in GBM regarding prognosis and response to treatments, for monitoring recurrence, also providing insights into the potential efficacy of such an approach for survival prognostication. Despite a high sensitivity and specificity in almost all studies, accuracy, reproducibility and clinical value of radiomic features are the Achilles heel of this newborn tool. Looking into the future, investigators' efforts should be directed towards standardization and a disciplined approach to data collection, algorithms, and statistical analysis.

Radiomics for pseudoprogression prediction in high grade gliomas: added value of MR contrast agent

Objective

Material & methods

Results

Conclusion

•

Radiomics allows for prediction of pseudoprogression in high-grade gliomas.

•

Use of contrast media boosts the performance of the Radiomics prediction model.

Metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma

Pseudoprogression (PsP) refers to treatment-related clinico-radiologic changes mimicking true progression (TP) that occurs in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), predominantly within the first 6 months after the completion of surgery and concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) with temozolomide. Accurate differentiation of TP from PsP is essential for making informed decisions on appropriate therapeutic intervention as well as for prognostication of these patients. Conventional neuroimaging findings are often equivocal in distinguishing between TP and PsP and present a considerable diagnostic dilemma to oncologists and radiologists. These challenges have emphasized the need for developing alternative imaging techniques that may aid in the accurate diagnosis of TP and PsP. In this review, we encapsulate the current state of knowledge in the clinical applications of commonly used metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques such as diffusion and perfusion imaging and proton spectroscopy in distinguishing TP from PsP. We also showcase the potential of promising imaging techniques, such as amide proton transfer and amino acid-based positron emission tomography, in providing useful information about the treatment response. Additionally, we highlight the role of "radiomics", which is an emerging field of radiology that has the potential to change the way in which advanced MR techniques are utilized in assessing treatment response in GBM patients. Finally, we present our institutional experiences and discuss future perspectives on the role of multiparametric MR imaging in identifying PsP in GBM patients treated with "standard-of-care" CCRT as well as novel/targeted therapies.

Management of metallic implants in radiotherapy

The number of patients with metallic implant and treated with radiotherapy is constantly increasing. These hardware are responsible for the deterioration in the quality of the CT images used at each stage of the radiation therapy, during delineation, dosimetry and dose delivery. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on the pros and cons of the different methods, existing and under evaluation, which limit the impact of metallic implants on the quality and safety of radiation treatments.

Radiological model based on the standard magnetic resonance sequences for detecting methylguanine methyltransferase methylation in glioma using texture analysis

This study aims to build a radiological model based on standard MR sequences for detecting methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation in gliomas using texture analysis. A retrospective cross‐sectional study was undertaken in a cohort of 53 glioma patients who underwent standard preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Conventional visual radiographic features and clinical factors were compared between MGMT promoter methylated and unmethylated groups. Texture analysis extracted the top five most powerful texture features of MR images in each sequence quantitatively for detecting the MGMT promoter methylation status. The radiomic signature (Radscore) was generated by a linear combination of the five features and estimates in each sequence. The combined model based on each Radscore was established using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, nomogram, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance of the model. No significant differences were observed in any of the visual radiographic features or clinical factors between different MGMT methylated statuses. The top five most powerful features were selected from a total of 396 texture features of T1, contrast‐enhanced T1, T2, and T2 FLAIR. Each sequence’s Radscore can distinguish MGMT methylated status. A combined model based on Radscores showed differentiation between methylated MGMT and unmethylated MGMT both in the glioblastoma (GBM) dataset as well as the dataset for all other gliomas. The area under the ROC curve values for the combined model was 0.818, with 90.5% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity, in the GBM dataset, and 0.833, with 70.2% sensitivity and 90.6% specificity, in the overall gliomas dataset. Nomogram, calibration, and DCA also validated the performance of the combined model. The combined model based on texture features could be considered as a noninvasive imaging marker for detecting MGMT methylation status in glioma.

Imaging Glioblastoma Posttreatment: Progression, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, Radiation Necrosis

Radiographic monitoring of posttreatment glioblastoma is important for clinical trials and determining next steps in management. Evaluation for tumor progression is confounded by the presence of treatment-related radiographic changes, making a definitive determination less straight-forward. The purpose of this article was to describe imaging tools available for assessing treatment response in glioblastoma, as well as to highlight the definitions, pathophysiology, and imaging features typical of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation necrosis.

Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma patients: A multiapproach literature review. Part 2 - Radiological features and metric markers

After chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma, pseudoprogression can occur and must be distinguished from true progression to correctly manage glioblastoma treatment and follow-up. Conventional treatment response assessment is evaluated via conventional MRI (contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2/FLAIR), which is unreliable. The emergence of advanced MRI techniques, MR spectroscopy, and PET tracers has improved pseudoprogression diagnostic accuracy. This review presents a literature review of the different imaging techniques and potential imaging biomarkers to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression.

Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma patients: A multiapproach literature review: Part 1 - Molecular, morphological and clinical features

With new therapeutic protocols, more patients treated for glioblastoma have experienced a suspicious radiologic image of progression (pseudoprogression) during follow-up. Pseudoprogression should be differentiated from true progression because the disease management is completely different. In the case of pseudoprogression, the follow-up continues, and the patient is considered stable. In the case of true progression, a treatment adjustment is necessary. Presently, a pseudoprogression diagnosis certainly needs to be pathologically confirmed. Some important efforts in the radiological, histopathological, and genomic fields have been made to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression, and the assessment of response criteria exists but remains limited. The aim of this paper is to highlight clinical and pathological markers to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression through a literature review.

DSC and DCE Histogram Analyses of Glioma Biomarkers, Including IDH, MGMT, and TERT, on Differentiation and Survival

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The World Health Organization 2016 classification of central nervous system tumors added the molecular classification of gliomas and has guiding significance for the operation and prognosis of glioma patients. At present, the perfusion technique plays an important role in judging the malignant degree of glioma. To evaluate the performance of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)- and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) histogram analyses in discriminating the states of molecular biomarkers and survival in glioma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three glioma patients who underwent DCE- and DSC-MRI were enrolled. Relevant molecular test results, including those on isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and telomere reverse transcriptase (TERT), were collected. The mean relative cerebral blood volume of DSC-MRI and histogram parameters derived from DCE-MRI (volume transfer coefficient (K^trans), fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space (V_e), fractional blood plasma volume (V_p), rate constant between the extravascular extracellular space and blood plasma (K_ep) and area under the curve (AUC)) were calculated. Differences in each parameter between gliomas with different expression states (IDH, MGMT, and TERT) were evaluated. The diagnostic efficiency of each parameter was analyzed. The overall survival of all patients was assessed.

RESULTS

The 10th percentile AUC (AUC = 0.830, sensitivity = 0.78, specificity = 0.80), the 90th percentile V_e (AUC = 0.816, sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.79), and the mean K_ep (AUC = 0.818, sensitivity = 0.76, specificity = 0.78) provided the highest differential efficiency for IDH, MGMT, and TERT, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant difference between subjects with a 10th percentile AUC higher or lower than 0.028 (log-rank = 7.535; p = 0.006) for IDH and between subjects with different 90th percentile V_e values (log-rank = 6.532; p = 0.011) for MGMT.

CONCLUSION

Histogram DCE-MRI demonstrates good diagnostic performance in identifying different molecular types and for the prognostic assessment of glioma.

Defining Treatment-Related Adverse Effects in Patients with Glioma: Distinctive Features of Pseudoprogression and Treatment-Induced Necrosis

Background

Pseudoprogression (PP) and treatment‐induced brain tissue necrosis (TN) are challenging cancer treatment–related effects. Both phenomena remain insufficiently defined; differentiation from recurrent disease frequently necessitates tissue biopsy. We here characterize distinctive features of PP and TN to facilitate noninvasive diagnosis and clinical management.

Materials and Methods

Patients with glioma and confirmed PP (defined as appearance <5 months after radiotherapy [RT] completion) or TN (>5 months after RT) were retrospectively compared using clinical, radiographic, and histopathological data. Each imaging event/lesion (region of interest [ROI]) diagnosed as PP or TN was longitudinally evaluated by serial imaging.

Results

We identified 64 cases of mostly (80%) biopsy‐confirmed PP (n = 27) and TN (n = 37), comprising 137 ROIs in total. Median time of onset for PP and TN was 1 and 11 months after RT, respectively. Clinically, PP occurred more frequently during active antineoplastic treatment, necessitated more steroid‐based interventions, and was associated with glioblastoma (81 vs. 40%), fewer IDH1 mutations, and shorter median overall survival. Radiographically, TN lesions often initially manifested periventricularly (n = 22/37; 60%), were more numerous (median, 2 vs. 1 ROIs), and contained fewer malignant elements upon biopsy. By contrast, PP predominantly developed around the tumor resection cavity as a non‐nodular, ring‐like enhancing structure. Both PP and TN lesions almost exclusively developed in the main prior radiation field. Presence of either condition appeared to be associated with above‐average overall survival.

Conclusion

PP and TN occur in clinically distinct patient populations and exhibit differences in spatial radiographic pattern. Increased familiarity with both conditions and their unique features will improve patient management and may avoid unnecessary surgical procedures.

Implications for Practice

Pseudoprogression (PP) and treatment‐induced brain tissue necrosis (TN) are challenging treatment‐related effects mimicking tumor progression in patients with brain cancer. Affected patients frequently require surgery to guide management. PP and TN remain arbitrarily defined and insufficiently characterized. Lack of clear diagnostic criteria compromises treatment and may adversely affect outcome interpretation in clinical trials. The present findings in a cohort of patients with glioma with PP/TN suggest that both phenomena exhibit unique clinical and imaging characteristics, manifest in different patient populations, and should be classified as distinct clinical conditions. Increased familiarity with PP and TN key features may guide clinicians toward timely noninvasive diagnosis, circumvent potentially unnecessary surgical procedures, and improve response assessment in neuro‐oncology.

Cancer treatment–related adverse effects on the brain are a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in neuro‐oncology. This article describes the key clinical and imaging features of pseudoprogression and treatment‐induced brain tissue necrosis in patients with malignant glioma in an attempt to improve the current understanding of these conditions, facilitate the noninvasive diagnosis of treatment‐related adverse effects, and improve response assessment in neuro‐oncology.

DC-AL GAN: Pseudoprogression and true tumor progression of glioblastoma multiform image classification based on DCGAN and AlexNet

PURPOSE

Pseudoprogression (PsP) occurs in 20-30% of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) after receiving the standard treatment. PsP exhibits similarities in shape and intensity to the true tumor progression (TTP) of GBM on the follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These similarities pose challenges to the differentiation of these types of progression and hence the selection of the appropriate clinical treatment strategy.

METHODS

To address this challenge, we introduced a novel feature learning method based on deep convolutional generative adversarial network (DCGAN) and AlexNet, termed DC-AL GAN, to discriminate between PsP and TTP in MRI images. Due to the adversarial relationship between the generator and the discriminator of DCGAN, high-level discriminative features of PsP and TTP can be derived for the discriminator with AlexNet. We also constructed a multifeature selection module to concatenate features from different layers, contributing to more powerful features used for effectively discriminating between PsP and TTP. Finally, these discriminative features from the discriminator are used for classification by a support vector machine (SVM). Tenfold cross-validation (CV) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) were applied to evaluate the performance of this developed algorithm.

RESULTS

The accuracy and AUC of DC-AL GAN for discriminating PsP and TTP after tenfold CV were 0.920 and 0.947. We also assessed the effects of different indicators (such as sensitivity and specificity) for features extracted from different layers to obtain a model with the best classification performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model DC-AL GAN is capable of learning discriminative representations from GBM datasets, and it achieves desirable PsP and TTP classification performance superior to other state-of-the-art methods. Therefore, the developed model would be useful in the diagnosis of PsP and TTP for GBM.

The value of MGMT promote methylation and IDH-1 mutation on diagnosis of pseudoprogression in patients with high-grade glioma: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To date, there are several published studies on the value of IDH-1 (isocitrate dehydrogenase-1) mutation and MGMT (O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferas) promoter methylated status on the diagnosis of pseudoprogression (PSP) and true tumor progression after or within chemo-radiotherapy of high grade glioma (HGG). We performed a meta-analysis about the significant value of these 2 molecular markers on the diagnosis of PsP in high- grade glioma.

METHODS

We searched the eligible studies from PubMed, Medline, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wan Fang Database. The relevant studies published before October 2018 were identified. ORs (odds ratios) with 95%CIs (confidence intervals) were used to evaluate the value using fixed- or random-effect model.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies about MGMT promoter methylated status and 4 studies about IDH-1 mutations were found eligible for this present meta-analysis. Significant value of MGMT promoter methylation status (OR = 4.02, 95%CI = 2.76-5.87, P < .001) and IDH-1 mutations (OR = 12.78, 95%CI = 3.86-42.35, P < .001) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provided evidences that MGMT promoter methylation status and IDH-1 mutations could distinguish PSP from true tumor progression.

Imaging Glioblastoma Posttreatment: Progression, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, Radiation Necrosis

Radiographic monitoring of posttreatment glioblastoma is important for clinical trials and determining next steps in management. Evaluation for tumor progression is confounded by the presence of treatment-related radiographic changes, making a definitive determination less straight-forward. The purpose of this article was to describe imaging tools available for assessing treatment response in glioblastoma, as well as to highlight the definitions, pathophysiology, and imaging features typical of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation necrosis.

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and radiogenomic biomarkers for glioma characterisation: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE:

The diversity of tumour characteristics among glioma patients, even within same tumour grade, is a big challenge for disease outcome prediction. A possible approach for improved radiological imaging could come from combining information obtained at the molecular level. This review assembles recent evidence highlighting the value of using radiogenomic biomarkers to infer the underlying biology of gliomas and its correlation with imaging features.

METHODS:

A literature search was done for articles published between 2002 and 2017 on Medline electronic databases. Of 249 titles identified, 38 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, with 14 articles related to quantifiable imaging parameters (heterogeneity, vascularity, diffusion, cell density, infiltrations, perfusion, and metabolite changes) and 24 articles relevant to molecular biomarkers linked to imaging.

RESULTS:

Genes found to correlate with various imaging phenotypes were EGFR, MGMT, IDH1, VEGF, PDGF, TP53, and Ki-67. EGFR is the most studied gene related to imaging characteristics in the studies reviewed (41.7%), followed by MGMT (20.8%) and IDH1 (16.7%). A summary of the relationship amongst glioma morphology, gene expressions, imaging characteristics, prognosis and therapeutic response are presented.

CONCLUSION:

The use of radiogenomics can provide insights to understanding tumour biology and the underlying molecular pathways. Certain MRI characteristics that show strong correlations with EGFR, MGMT and IDH1 could be used as imaging biomarkers. Knowing the pathways involved in tumour progression and their associated imaging patterns may assist in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment management, while facilitating personalised medicine.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

Radiogenomics can offer clinicians better insight into diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of therapeutic responses of glioma.

Differentiating pseudoprogression from true progression: analysis of radiographic, biologic, and clinical clues in GBM

INTRODUCTION

Pseudoprogression (PsP) is a diagnostic dilemma in glioblastoma (GBM) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features may fail to distinguish PsP from early true progression (eTP), however clinical findings may aid in their distinction.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients received CRT for GBM between 2003 and 2016, and had pre- and post-treatment imaging suitable for retrospective evaluation using RANO criteria. Patients with signs of progression within the first 12-weeks post-radiation (P-12) were selected. Lesions that improved or stabilized were defined as PsP, and lesions that progressed were defined as eTP.

RESULTS

The median follow up for all patients was 17.6 months. Signs of progression developed in 35/67 (52.2%) patients within P-12. Of these, 20/35 (57.1%) were subsequently defined as eTP and 15/35 (42.9%) as PsP. MRI demonstrated increased contrast enhancement in 84.2% of eTP and 100% of PsP, and elevated CBV in 73.7% for eTP and 93.3% for PsP. A decrease in FLAIR was not seen in eTP patients, but was seen in 26.7% PsP patients. Patients with eTP were significantly more likely to require increased steroid doses or suffer clinical decline than PsP patients (OR 4.89, 95% CI 1.003-19.27; p = 0.046). KPS declined in 25% with eTP and none of the PsP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI imaging did not differentiate eTP from PsP, however, KPS decline or need for increased steroids was significantly more common in eTP versus PsP. Investigation and standardization of clinical assessments in response criteria may help address the diagnostic dilemma of pseudoprogression after frontline treatment for GBM.

A multi-sequence and habitat-based MRI radiomics signature for preoperative prediction of MGMT promoter methylation in astrocytomas with prognostic implication

Objectives

Oxygen 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation is a significant prognostic biomarker in astrocytomas, especially for temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. This study aimed to preoperatively predict MGMT methylation status based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics and validate its value for evaluation of TMZ chemotherapy effect.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 105 patients with grade II-IV astrocytomas. Radiomic features were extracted from the tumour and peritumoral oedema habitats on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. The following radiomics analysis was structured in three phases: feature reduction, signature construction and discrimination statistics. A fusion radiomics signature was finally developed using logistic regression modelling. Predictive performance was compared between the radiomics signature, previously reported clinical factors and ADC parameters. Validation was additionally performed on a time-independent cohort (n = 31). The prognostic value of the signature on overall survival for TMZ chemotherapy was explored using Kaplan Meier estimation.

Results

The fusion radiomics signature exhibited supreme power for predicting MGMT promoter methylation, with area under the curve values of 0.925 in the training cohort and 0.902 in the validation cohort. Performance of the radiomics signature surpassed that of clinical factors and ADC parameters. Moreover, the radiomics approach successfully divided patients into high-risk and low-risk groups for overall survival after TMZ chemotherapy (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

The proposed radiomics signature accurately predicted MGMT promoter methylation in patients with astrocytomas, and achieved survival stratification for TMZ chemotherapy, thus providing a preoperative basis for individualised treatment planning.

Key Points

• Radiomics using magnetic resonance imaging can preoperatively perform satisfactory prediction of MGMT methylation in grade II-IV astrocytomas.

• Habitat-based radiomics can improve efficacy in predicting MGMT methylation status.

• Multi-sequence radiomics signature has the power to evaluate TMZ chemotherapy effect.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5575-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Epigenetic inactivation of tumour suppressor coding and non-coding genes in human cancer: an update

Cancer cells undergo many different alterations during their transformation, including genetic and epigenetic events. The controlled division of healthy cells can be impaired through the downregulation of tumour suppressor genes. Here, we provide an update of the mechanisms in which epigenetically altered coding and non-coding tumour suppressor genes are implicated. We will highlight the importance of epigenetics in the different molecular pathways that lead to enhanced and unlimited capacity of division, genomic instability, metabolic shift, acquisition of mesenchymal features that lead to metastasis, and tumour plasticity. We will briefly describe these pathways, focusing especially on genes whose epigenetic inactivation through DNA methylation has been recently described, as well as on those that are well established as being epigenetically silenced in cancer. A brief perspective of current clinical therapeutic approaches that can revert epigenetic inactivation of non-coding tumour suppressor genes will also be given.

Multiregional radiomics features from multiparametric MRI for prediction of MGMT methylation status in glioblastoma multiforme: A multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

To build a reliable radiomics model from multiregional and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pretreatment prediction of O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation status in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

METHODS

In this retrospective multicentre study, 1,705 multiregional radiomics features were automatically extracted from multiparametric MRI. A radiomics model with a minimal set of all-relevant features and a radiomics model with univariately-predictive and non-redundant features were built for MGMT methylation prediction from a primary cohort (133 patients) and tested on an independent validation cohort (60 patients). Predictive models combing clinical factors were built and evaluated. Both radiomics models were assessed on subgroups stratified by clinical factors.

RESULTS

The radiomics model with six all-relevant features allowed pretreatment prediction of MGMT methylation (AUC=0.88, accuracy=80 %), which significantly outperformed the model with eight univariately-predictive and non-redundant features (AUC=0.76, accuracy=70 %). Combing clinical factors with radiomics features did not benefit the prediction performance. The all-relevant model achieved significantly better performance in stratified analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics model built from multiregional and multiparameter MRI may serve as a potential imaging biomarker for pretreatment prediction of MGMT methylation in GBM. The all-relevant features have the potential of offering better predictive power than the univariately-predictive and non-redundant features.

KEY POINTS

• Multiregional and multiparametric MRI features reliably predicted MGMT methylation in multicentre cohorts. • All-relevant imaging features predicted MGMT methylation better than univariately-predictive and non-redundant features. • Combing clinical factors with radiomics features did not benefit the prediction performance.

Differentiation of residual/recurrent gliomas from postradiation necrosis with arterial spin labeling and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging-derived metrics

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to differentiate recurrent/residual gliomas from postradiation changes using arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived metrics.

METHODS

Prospective study was conducted upon 42 patients with high-grade gliomas after radiotherapy only or prior to other therapies that underwent routine MR imaging, ASL, and DTI. The tumor blood flow (TBF), fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean diffusivity (MD) of the enhanced lesion and related edema were calculated. The lesion was categorized as recurrence/residual or postradiation changes.

RESULTS

There was significant differences between residual/recurrent gliomas and postradiation changes of TBF (P = 0.001), FA (P = 0.001 and 0.04), and MD (P = 0.001) of enhanced lesion and related edema respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of TBF of enhanced lesion and related edema used to differentiate residual/recurrent gliomas from postradiation changes were 0.95 and 0.93 and of MD were 0.95 and 0.81 and of FA were 0.81 and 0.695, respectively. Combined ASL and DTI metrics of the enhanced lesion revealed AUC of 0.98, accuracy of 95%, sensitivity of 93.8%, specificity of 95.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.8%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.8%. Combined metrics of ASL and DTI of related edema revealed AUC of 0.97, accuracy of 92.5%, sensitivity of 93.8%, specificity of 91.7%, PPV of 88.2%, and NPV of 95.7.

CONCLUSION

Combined ASL and DTI metrics of enhanced lesion and related edema are valuable noninvasive tools in differentiating residual/recurrent gliomas from postradiation changes.

Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software

PURPOSE

Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE) are useful tools in the diagnosis and follow-up of brain gliomas; nevertheless, both techniques leave the open issue of data reproducibility. We evaluated the reproducibility of data obtained using two different commercial software for perfusion maps calculation and analysis, as one of the potential sources of variability can be the software itself.

METHODS

DSC and DCE analyses from 20 patients with gliomas were tested for both the intrasoftware (as intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility) and the intersoftware reproducibility, as well as the impact of different postprocessing choices [vascular input function (VIF) selection and deconvolution algorithms] on the quantification of perfusion biomarkers plasma volume (Vp), volume transfer constant (K ^trans) and rCBV. Data reproducibility was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

For all the biomarkers, the intra- and interobserver reproducibility resulted in almost perfect agreement in each software, whereas for the intersoftware reproducibility the value ranged from 0.311 to 0.577, suggesting fair to moderate agreement; Bland-Altman analysis showed high dispersion of data, thus confirming these findings. Comparisons of different VIF estimation methods for DCE biomarkers resulted in ICC of 0.636 for K ^trans and 0.662 for Vp; comparison of two deconvolution algorithms in DSC resulted in an ICC of 0.999.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of single software ensures very good intraobserver and interobservers reproducibility. Caution should be taken when comparing data obtained using different software or different postprocessing within the same software, as reproducibility is not guaranteed anymore.