Altered signal intensity of active enhancing inflammatory lesions using post-contrast double inversion recovery MR sequence

Contrast-enhanced double inversion recovery sequence for patients with multiple sclerosis: feasibility of subtraction images between pre- and post-contrast images

BACKGROUND

Few reports have examined the feasibility of a post-contrast double inversion recovery (DIR) magnetic resonance (MR) sequence in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) because of partial or complete signal loss of enhancing MS lesions.

PURPOSE

To compare subtracted images of DIR (pre-contrast - post-contrast DIR images) with contrast enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) images in the depiction of contrast enhancement of MS lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 27 patients were included. Two neuroradiologists interpreted both images of CE-T1W imaging and subtracted DIR, and interpretation of the images was classified into a score of 1-5 (from 5, definitely superior contrast of lesions on DIR subtraction compared to conventional CE-T1W imaging, to 1, definitely superior contrast of lesions on CE-T1W imaging. The interrater agreement (κ coefficient) was measured. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-noise-ratio (CNR) of the lesion were compared.

RESULTS

A significant difference (P < 0.001) in scoring was seen between conventional CE-T1W imaging (2.1 ± 1.5 with one reviewer and 2.4 ± 1.5 with the other) and DIR subtraction (4.4 ± 1.0 with one reviewer and 4.7 ± 0.8 with the other). SNR from conventional CE-T1W imaging (24.8 ± 14.7) was significantly superior to that from DIR subtraction (4.0 ± 1.0; P < 0.001). CNR in DIR subtraction (326.4 ± 250.0) was significantly superior to that in conventional CE-T1W imaging (0.8 ± 5.5; P < 0.001). For interrater agreement in the evaluation of contrast enhancement of the lesions, κ coefficients were 0.84 for conventional CE-T1W imaging and 0.72 for DIR subtraction.

CONCLUSION

Subtracted DIR image enables more obvious contrast enhancement of the MS lesions compared with conventional CE-T1W imaging.

3D double inversion recovery MR imaging: Clinical applications and usefulness in a wide spectrum of central nervous system diseases

Double inversion recovery (DIR) imaging provides two inversion pulses that attenuate signals from cerebrospinal fluid and normal white matter. This review was undertaken to describe the principle of the DIR sequence, the clinical applications of 3D DIR in various central nervous system diseases and the clinical benefits of the 3D DIR compared with those of other MR sequences. 3D DIR imaging provides better lesion conspicuity and topography than other MR techniques. It is particularly useful for diagnosing the following disease entities: cortical and subcortical abnormalities such as multiple sclerosis, cortical microinfarcts and cortical development anomalies; sulcal abnormalities such as meningitis and subacute/chronic subarachnoid hemorrhage; and optic neuritis caused by multiple sclerosis or neuromyelitis optica.

Pre- and Postcontrast 3D Double Inversion Recovery Sequence in Multiple Sclerosis: A Simple and Effective MR Imaging Protocol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The double inversion recovery sequence is known to be very sensitive and specific for MS-related lesions. Our aim was to compare the sensitivity of pre- and postcontrast images of 3D double inversion recovery and conventional 3D T1-weighted images for the detection of contrast-enhancing MS-related lesions in the brain to analyze whether double inversion recovery could be as effective as T1WI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A postcontrast 3D double inversion recovery sequence was acquired in addition to the standard MR imaging protocol at 3T, including pre- and postcontrast 3D T1WI sequences as well as precontrast double inversion recovery of 45 consecutive patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome between June and December 2013. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed precontrast, postcontrast, and subtraction images of double inversion recovery as well as T1WI to count the number of contrast-enhancing lesions. Afterward, a consensus reading was performed. Lin concordance was calculated between both radiologists, and differences in lesion detectability were assessed with the Student t test. Additionally, the contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated.

RESULTS

Significantly more contrast-enhancing lesions could be detected with double inversion recovery compared with T1WI (16%, 214 versus 185, P = .007). The concordance between both radiologists was almost perfect (ρ_c = 0.94 for T1WI and ρ_c = 0.98 for double inversion recovery, respectively). The contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher in double inversion recovery subtraction images compared with T1-weighted subtraction images (double inversion recovery, 14.3 ± 5.5; T1WI, 6.3 ± 7.1; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre- and postcontrast double inversion recovery enables better detection of contrast-enhancing lesions in MS in the brain compared with T1WI and may be considered an alternative to the standard MR imaging protocol.