Differential Effects of Fingolimod and Natalizumab on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Fingolimod and natalizumab are approved disease-modifying drugs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The two drugs have different modes of action and may therefore influence different aspects of MS-related tissue damage. In this retrospective cohort study, we longitudinally compared patients treated with fingolimod and patients treated with natalizumab by measures based on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We included patients with RRMS given that two standardized MRI scans under the same drug were available with an interval of at least 6 months both from therapy start to baseline scan and from baseline scan to follow-up scan. After matching for age, baseline and follow-up scans from 93 patients (fingolimod, 48; natalizumab, 45) were investigated. Mean follow-up time was 1.9 years. We determined the number of new white matter lesions as well as thalamic, cortical, and whole-brain atrophy. After scaling for time of the interscan interval, measures were analyzed by group comparisons and, to account for demographic and clinical characteristics, by multiple regression models and a binary logistic regression model. Compared to natalizumab, fingolimod treatment went along with more new white matter lesions (median [interquartile range, IQR] 0.0 [0.0; 0.7] vs. 0.0 [0.0; 0.0] /year; p < 0.01) whereas whole-brain atrophy was lower (median [IQR] 0.2 [0.0; 0.5] vs. 0.5 [0.2; 1.0] %/year; p = 0.01). These significant differences were confirmed by multiple regression models and the binary logistic regression model. In conclusion, our observation is compatible with stronger neuroprotective properties of fingolimod compared to natalizumab.

Imaging glioma biology: spatial comparison of amino acid PET, amide proton transfer, and perfusion-weighted MRI in newly diagnosed gliomas

PURPOSE

Imaging glioma biology holds great promise to unravel the complex nature of these tumors. Besides well-established imaging techniques such O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET)-PET and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion imaging, amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging has emerged as a promising novel MR technique. In this study, we aimed to better understand the relation between these imaging biomarkers and how well they capture cellularity and vascularity in newly diagnosed gliomas.

METHODS

Preoperative MRI and FET-PET data of 46 patients (31 glioblastoma and 15 lower-grade glioma) were segmented into contrast-enhancing and FLAIR-hyperintense areas. Using established cutoffs, we calculated hot-spot volumes (HSV) and their spatial overlap. We further investigated APTw and CBV values in FET-HSV. In a subset of 10 glioblastoma patients, we compared cellularity and vascularization in 34 stereotactically targeted biopsies with imaging.

RESULTS

In glioblastomas, the largest HSV was found for APTw, followed by PET and CBV (p < 0.05). In lower-grade gliomas, APTw-HSV was clearly lower than in glioblastomas. The spatial overlap of HSV was highest between APTw and FET in both tumor entities and regions. APTw correlated significantly with cellularity, similar to FET, while the association with vascularity was more pronounced in CBV and FET.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a relevant spatial overlap in glioblastomas between hotspots of APTw and FET both in contrast-enhancing and FLAIR-hyperintense tumor. As suggested by earlier studies, APTw was lower in lower-grade gliomas compared with glioblastomas. APTw meaningfully contributes to biological imaging of gliomas.

Pre- and Postcontrast 3D Double Inversion Recovery Sequence in Multiple Sclerosis: A Simple and Effective MR Imaging Protocol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The double inversion recovery sequence is known to be very sensitive and specific for MS-related lesions. Our aim was to compare the sensitivity of pre- and postcontrast images of 3D double inversion recovery and conventional 3D T1-weighted images for the detection of contrast-enhancing MS-related lesions in the brain to analyze whether double inversion recovery could be as effective as T1WI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A postcontrast 3D double inversion recovery sequence was acquired in addition to the standard MR imaging protocol at 3T, including pre- and postcontrast 3D T1WI sequences as well as precontrast double inversion recovery of 45 consecutive patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome between June and December 2013. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed precontrast, postcontrast, and subtraction images of double inversion recovery as well as T1WI to count the number of contrast-enhancing lesions. Afterward, a consensus reading was performed. Lin concordance was calculated between both radiologists, and differences in lesion detectability were assessed with the Student t test. Additionally, the contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated.

RESULTS

Significantly more contrast-enhancing lesions could be detected with double inversion recovery compared with T1WI (16%, 214 versus 185, P = .007). The concordance between both radiologists was almost perfect (ρ_c = 0.94 for T1WI and ρ_c = 0.98 for double inversion recovery, respectively). The contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher in double inversion recovery subtraction images compared with T1-weighted subtraction images (double inversion recovery, 14.3 ± 5.5; T1WI, 6.3 ± 7.1; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre- and postcontrast double inversion recovery enables better detection of contrast-enhancing lesions in MS in the brain compared with T1WI and may be considered an alternative to the standard MR imaging protocol.