Lateral epicondylitis: Associations of MR imaging and clinical assessments with treatment options in patients receiving conservative and arthroscopic managements

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Different Surgical Approaches for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most common causes of lateral elbow pain. When nonoperative treatment fails, 1 of the 3 surgical approaches-open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic-is used. However, determining which approach has the superior clinical outcome remains controversial.

Purpose

To review the outcomes of different operative modalities for LE qualitatively and quantitatively.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

This review was performed and reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies published in PubMed, Medline (via EBSCO), and ScienceDirect databases that treated LE with open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic approaches with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score. The primary outcome was the success rate of each operative treatment approach-open, percutaneous, and arthroscopic.

Results

From an initial search result of 603 studies, 43 studies (n = 1941 elbows) were ultimately included. The arthroscopic approach had the highest success rate (91.9% [95% CI, 89.2%-94.7%]) compared with the percutaneous (91% [95% CI, 87.3%-94.6%]) and open (82.7% [95% CI, 75.6%-89.8%]) approaches for LE surgery with changes in the mean visual analog scale pain score of 5.54, 4.90, and 3.63, respectively. According to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the functional outcome improved in the arthroscopic group (from 54.11 to 15.47), the percutaneous group (from 44.90 to 10.47), and the open group (from 53.55 to 16.13). The overall improvement was also found in the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the arthroscopic group (from 55.12 to 90.97), the percutaneous group (from 56.31 to 87.65), and the open group (from 64 to 93.37).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic surgery had the highest rate of success and the best improvement in functional outcomes among the 3 approaches of LE surgery.

Magnetic resonance imaging predicts outcomes of conservative treatment in patients with lateral epicondylitis

BACKGROUND

The clinical validity of positive magnetic resonance imaging findings in lateral epicondylitis is controversial. We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging could predict the outcome of conservative treatment. This study determined the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging-defined disease severity and treatment outcomes in patients with lateral epicondylitis.

METHODS

This retrospective single-cohort study included 43 conservatively managed and 50 surgically treated patients with lateral epicondylitis. The magnetic resonance imaging scores and clinical outcomes were examined six months post-treatment, and the former was compared between patients with good and poor treatment outcomes. We developed operating characteristic curves of magnetic resonance imaging scores for treatment outcomes, and divided patients into magnetic resonance imaging-mild and severe groups according to the obtained cut-off value of the scores. We compared the outcomes of conservative treatment with that of surgery for each magnetic resonance imaging severity.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine (67.4%) conservatively treated patients had good outcomes, while 14 (32.6%) had poor outcomes. The magnetic resonance imaging score was higher in patients with poor outcomes; the cut-off value was 6. Forty-three (86.0%) surgically treated patients had good outcomes, while 7 (14.0%) had poor outcomes. There was no significant difference in magnetic resonance imaging scores between patients with good and poor surgical outcomes. In the magnetic resonance imaging-mild group (score ≤ 5), the outcome showed no significant difference between the conservative and surgical treatment groups. In the magnetic resonance imaging-severe group (score≥6), the outcome of conservative treatment was significantly worse than that of surgical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnetic resonance imaging score was associated with conservative treatment outcomes. A treatment strategy that includes surgery should be considered for patients with severe magnetic resonance imaging findings; this is not recommended for those with mild magnetic resonance imaging findings. Magnetic resonance imaging is helpful in determining the best treatment strategies for patients with lateral epicondylitis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective cohort study.

Comparing the efficacy of Agnikarma with therapeutic ultrasound in the management of tennis elbow - A randomised controlled preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Tennis elbow is a common musculoskeletal disease of elbow and causes restricted movement of forearm. Various treatment modalities like NSAID, corticosteroid injection, counter bracing, physiotherapy, surgery etc are available but safety and efficacy of one treatment over another is under research. Ayurveda classifies this condition as Snayugata vata. According to Sushruta, Agnikarma (thermal cautery) is the one among the treatment modalities for Snayugata vata. Previously published randomised controlled trials have shown that therapeutic ultrasound is safe and effective for tennis elbow. However, the comparative efficacy of these two treatment modalities is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the effects of Agnikarma (AGK) with Therapeutic Ultrasound (TUS) in reducing pain, tenderness and restores the ability to do various tasks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 patients were enrolled in the study as an open-label, double-armed, prospectively designed comparative clinical study, with 15 patients in each group. Group AGK received two sittings of Agnikarma and Group TUS received therapeutic ultrasound. To analyze the patients, three outcome measures were adopted: pain intensity, assessed with a Numerical Pain Rating Scale, tenderness - Grade 0 to Grade 4 (mentioned in Hutchinson's clinical methods) and pain and functional Disability assessed with the Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire. Assessment was done on 0th, 8th, 15th, 30th and 60th day.

RESULT

Tennis elbow can be effectively treated with AGK and TUS. (p < 0.001 for pain, tenderness and PRTEE). While comparing between the groups, on 8th day and 15th day statistically significant difference in pain and PRTEE (p < 0.05) was noted between AGK and TUS groups. Agnikarma showed better results than therapeutic ultrasound in pain management and showed an improved quality of life from 8th day onwards and for a period up to 2 months.

CONCLUSION

Both Agnikarma and therapeutic ultrasound have roles in the management of tennis elbow. However, starting on the 8th day and continuing for up to 2 months, Agnikarma showed a significant benefit in pain management and improved status for quality of life.

A Novel Surgical Treatment Management Algorithm for Elbow Posterolateral Rotatory Instability (PLRI) Based on the Common Extensor Origin Integrity

Background: Here, we introduce a comprehensive treatment algorithm for posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow, a condition affecting elbow mobility. We outline a diagnostic approach and a novel surgical management plan through the arthroscopic surgeon's point of view. Methods: The central focus of this management approach is the integrity of common extensor origin (CEO). High clinical suspicion must be evident to diagnose PLRI. Special clinical and imaging tests can confirm PLRI but sometimes the final confirmation is established during the arthroscopic treatment. The most appropriate treatment is determined by the degree of CEO integrity. Results: The treatment strategy varies with the CEO's condition: intact or minor tears require arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament imbrication, while extensive tears may need plication reinforced with imbrication or, in cases of retraction, a triceps tendon autograft reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament alongside CEO repair. These approaches aim to manage residual instability and are complemented using a tailored rehabilitation protocol to optimize functional outcomes. Conclusion: PLRI is a unique clinical condition and should be treated likewise. This algorithm offers valuable insights for diagnosing and treating PLRI, enhancing therapeutic decision-making.

Thin-slice elbow MRI with deep learning reconstruction: Superior diagnostic performance of elbow ligament pathologies

PURPOSE

With the slice thickness routinely used in elbow MRI, small or subtle lesions may be overlooked or misinterpreted as insignificant. To compare 1 mm slice thickness MRI (1 mm MRI) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) to 3 mm slice thickness MRI (3 mm MRI) without/with DLR, and 1 mm MRI without DLR regarding image quality and diagnostic performance for elbow tendons and ligaments.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 53 patients between February 2021 and January 2022, who underwent 3 T elbow MRI, including T2-weighted fat-saturated coronal 3 mm and 1 mm MRI without/with DLR. Two radiologists independently assessed four MRI scans for image quality and artefacts, and identified the pathologies of the five elbow tendons and ligaments. In 19 patients underwent elbow surgery after elbow MRI, diagnostic performance was evaluated using surgical records as a reference standard.

RESULTS

For both readers, 3 mm MRI with DLR had significant higher image quality scores than 3 mm MRI without DLR and 1 mm MRI with DLR (all P < 0.01). For common extensor tendon and elbow ligament pathologies, 1 mm MRI with DLR showed the highest number of pathologies for both readers. The 1 mm MRI with DLR had the highest kappa values for all tendons and ligaments. For reader 1, 1 mm MRI with DLR showed superior diagnostic performance than 3 mm MRI without/with DLR. For reader 2, 1 mm MRI with DLR showed the highest diagnostic performance; however, there was no significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

One mm MRI with DLR showed the highest diagnostic performance for evaluating elbow tendon and ligament pathologies, with similar subjective image qualities and artefacts.

Posterior Translation of the Radial Head in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lateral Epicondylitis

Background

Posterolateral rotatory instability is produced by disruption of the lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC); it is commonly induced by trauma, with few cases reported due to lateral epicondylitis. We examined the amount of posterior transition of the radial head with or without LCLC injury, common extensor tendon (CET) injury, and Baker classification in lateral epicondylitis.

Methods

We retrospectively studied patients with lateral epicondylitis of the humerus who underwent surgery between April 2016 and July 2021. Fifteen elbows with coronal and sagittal images on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. We investigated the amount of posterior transition of the radial head in sagittal MRI images of the elbow, which were compared based on LCLC and CET lesion.

Results

The mean age of patients was 49 years. The lesions in four, nine, and two patients were classified as LCLC0, LCLC1, and LCLC2, respectively. The mean radio-humeral distance values among the LCLC lesions were 0.65, 2.46, and 2.22 mm in LCLC0, LCLC1, and LCLC2, respectively, with the RHD between LCLC0 and LCLC1 differing significantly. In five, six, and four patients, the lesions were classified as CET1, CET2, and CET3, respectively. The mean RHD values among the CET lesions were 1.33, 2.68, and 1.48 mm in CET1, CET2, and CET3, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results showed that posterior transition of the radial head is greater in patients with lateral epicondylitis with LCLC lesions on MRI than those with normal findings of LCLC.

TikTok content as a source of health education regarding epicondylitis: a content analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the validity and informational value of TikTok content about epicondylitis. The hypothesis tested herein was that TikTok video content would not provide adequate and valid information.

METHODS

The term "epicondylitis" was used as a keyword to comprehensively search for TikTok videos, and the first 100 videos that were retrieved were subsequently included for analysis. The duration, number of likes, number of shares and number of views were recorded for each video. Furthermore, the videos were categorized on the basis of their source (medical doctor, physiotherapist, or private user), type of information (physical therapy, anatomy, clinical examination, etiopathogenesis, patient experience, treatment, or other), video content (rehabilitation, education, or patient experience/testimony), and the presence of music or voice. Assessments of video content quality and reliability were conducted using the DISCERN tool, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS).

RESULTS

A total of 100 videos were included in the analysis: 78 (78.0%) were published by physiotherapists, 18 were published by medical doctors (18.0%), and 4 were published by private users (4.0%). Most of the information pertained to physical therapy (75; 75.0%) and most of the content was about rehabilitation (75; 75.0%). The mean length of the videos was 42.51 ± 24.75 seconds; the mean number of views was 193,207.78 ± 1,300,853.86; and the mean number of comments, likes, and shares were 22.43 ± 62.54, 1578.52 ± 8333.11, and 149.87 ± 577.73, respectively. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 18.12 ± 5.73, 0.80 ± 0.53, and 1.30 ± 0.52, respectively. Videos posted by medical doctors/private users had higher scores (p < 0.05) than videos posted by physiotherapists. Videos that focused on education or patient experience had higher scores (p < 0.05) than videos based on rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

TikTok can be an unreliable source of information regarding epicondylitis treatment. It is common to find nonphysicians who share medical advice on the platform, with medical treatments demonstrating the weakest level of supporting evidence. Elbow surgeons should advise their patients that treatment recommendations from TikTok may not align with established guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-Cross-sectional study.

Clinical and radiological effects of Corticosteroid injection combined with deep transverse friction massage and Mill's manipulation in lateral epicondylalgia-A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, sham controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The knowledge about the effective implementation of corticosteroid injection (CS) with deep transverse friction massage (DTFM) and Mill's manipulation (MM) on clinical and radiological changes (Magnetic resonance imaging-MRI and Ultra sound) in lateral epicondylalgia (LE) is lacking. Therefore, the objective of this study is proposed to find and compare the effects of corticosteroid injection (CS) DTFM and Mill's manipulation on clinical and radiological changes in lateral epicondylalgia.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

Randomized, single-blinded, controlled study was conducted on 60 LE participants at university hospital. The active MM group (n = 30) received corticosteroid injection with DTFM and active Mill's manipulation (MM) three sessions a week for 4 weeks and the sham MM group received corticosteroid injection with sham manipulation. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analog scale. The other outcome measures were percentage of injury measured by MRI and ultrasound, functional disability, handgrip strength, patient perception, kinesiophobia, depression status and quality of life which were measured at 4 weeks, 8weeks and at 6 months follow up.

RESULTS

The between-group difference in pain intensity at 4 weeks was 1.6 (CI 95% 0.97 to 2.22), which shows improvement in the active group than sham group. The similar effects have been noted after 8 weeks and at 6 months 2.0 (CI 95% 1.66 to 2.33) follow up in pain intensity. Similar improvements were also found on percentage of injury, functional disability, handgrip strength, patient perception, kinesiophobia, depression status and quality of life (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroid injection with DTFM and Mill's manipulation was superior to sham group for improving pain, percentage of injury, functional disability, handgrip strength, patient perception, kinesiophobia, depression status and quality of life in people with lateral epicondylalgia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2020/05/025135 trial registered prospectively on 12/05/2020. https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=CTRI/2020/05/025135.

Arthroscopic Debridement for Refractory Lateral Epicondylitis Results for Substantial Improvement in Tendinosis Scores and Good Clinical Outcomes: Qualitative and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis

PURPOSE

To qualify and quantify the changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signals in the extensor tendons after arthroscopic debridement for lateral epicondylitis and evaluate the association between MRI findings and temporal clinical results by comparisons between recovered and unrecovered cases.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with refractory lateral epicondylitis treated with arthroscopic debridement were divided into recovered (n = 24) and unrecovered (n = 10) groups according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association-Japan Elbow Society score. This study included any patients who underwent both the pre- and postoperative MRI and excluded patients with a previous history of any elbow surgery. Pre- and postoperative MRI findings were qualitatively categorized into 4 grades, quantified by measuring the percentage of tendinopathy area, and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, grading scores and percentages did not show significant differences between groups (P = .050 and .519). The respective numbers of patients with grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 1 (4%), 3 (13%), 10 (42%), and 10 (42%) in the recovered group; and 1 (10%), 2 (20%), 7 (70%), and 0 (0%) in the unrecovered group. The average percentages in the recovered and unrecovered groups were 42.3% (73.9 mm²/168.4 mm²); and 36.5% (50.5 mm²/131.0 mm²). However, postoperatively, they were significantly lower in the recovered group than in the unrecovered group (P = .007 and .014). The numbers and percentages in the recovered and unrecovered groups were 15 (63%), 8 (33%), 1 (4%), and 0 (0%) and 17.0% (28.6mm²/169.8mm²) and 2 (20%), 3 (30%), 5 (50%), and 0 (0%) and 30.5% (39.0 mm²/131.8 mm²).

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative and quantitative MRI is useful for evaluating the progress of tendon healing after arthroscopic debridement. In the recovered and unrecovered groups, improvement of tendinopathy area were 60% versus 16%, indicating that postoperative MRI findings reflect clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series with subgroup analysis.

MRI and Ultrasound Analysis of Corticosteroid Injection Combined with Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Lateral Epicondylitis—A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Objective: The knowledge about the effective implementation of corticosteroid injection and extracorporeal shockwave therapy on radiological changes in chronic lateral epicondylitis is lacking. Therefore, the objective of this study is to find and compare the effects of corticosteroid injection and extracorporeal shockwave therapy on radiological changes in chronic lateral epicondylitis. Methods: A randomized, double-blinded controlled study was conducted on 60 LE participants at a university hospital. The active extracorporeal shockwave therapy group (n = 30) received a corticosteroid injection with active extracorporeal shockwave therapy one session a week for 4 weeks, and the placebo extracorporeal shockwave therapy group received a corticosteroid injection with placebo extracorporeal shockwave therapy. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analog scale. The other outcome measures were the percentage of injury measured by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound, functional disability, handgrip strength, patient perception, kinesiophobia, depression status, and quality of life. Results: The between-group difference in pain intensity at 4 weeks was 1.4 (CI 95% 0.77 to 2.02), which shows more improvement in the active group than in the placebo group. Improvements in the effects were noted after 8 weeks and at 6 months (1.8; CI 95% 1.50 to 2.09) follow-up. Similar improvements were also found in the percentage of injury, functional disability, handgrip strength, patient perception, kinesiophobia, depression status, and quality of life. Conclusion: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy has added effects on corticosteroid injection for improving pain, percentage of injury, functional disability, handgrip strength, patient perception, kinesiophobia, depression status and quality of life in people with chronic lateral epicondylitis.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Elbow Pain

Chronic elbow pain can be osseous, soft tissue, cartilaginous, and nerve related in etiology. Imaging plays an important role in differentiating between these causes of chronic elbow pain. This document provides recommendations for imaging of chronic elbow pain in adult patients. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Individual Evaluation of the Common Extensor Tendon and Lateral Collateral Ligament Improves the Severity Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lateral Epicondylitis

The effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing lateral epicondylitis severity is controversial. We aimed to verify whether individual evaluations of the common extensor tendon and lateral collateral ligament would improve the severity diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for lateral epicondylitis. We obtained coronal images of the lateral elbow in three groups: healthy, clinically mild, and clinically severe. We used our scoring system for evaluation using combined and individual methods. We developed the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosis using the scores of the healthy and mild groups and that for severity diagnosis using the scores of the mild and severe groups. The scores, in decreasing value, were those of the severe, mild, and healthy groups, with a significant difference in both methods. The curve for diagnosis showed an area under the curve of 0.85 for the combined evaluation and 0.89 for the individual evaluation, without a significant difference between the methods (p = 0.23). The curve for severity diagnosis showed an area under the curve of 0.69 for combined and 0.81 for individual evaluation, with a significant difference between the methods (p = 0.046). Individual evaluation of the common extensor tendon and lateral collateral ligament improved the severity diagnostic accuracy of lateral epicondylitis.

Repeated magnetic resonance imaging at 6 follow-up visits over a 2-year period after platelet-rich plasma injection in patients with lateral epicondylitis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for lateral epicondylitis has been demonstrated. However, the healing process monitored by repeated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sequential changes using MRI in patients with lateral epicondylitis treated by PRP injection at 6 follow-up visits over a 2-year period.

METHODS

Thirty patients who underwent PRP treatment for lateral epicondylitis and sequential MRI evaluation were prospectively enrolled. The MRI scores (ranging from 0 to 3) and clinical scores, including the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) score, were measured at baseline (before treatment) and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the procedure. Sequential changes in the MRI scores and clinical scores during the treatment period were evaluated. In addition, the associations between MRI scores and clinical scores were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean MRI score at baseline was 2.30, and the mean MRI scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the procedure were 1.97, 1.77, 1.13, 0.73, 0.60, and 0.33, respectively. Significant improvements in the MRI scores occurred by 3 months and continued over a period of 24 months. Regarding the clinical scores, the mean VAS pain scores were 72 at baseline, 48 at 1 month, 34 at 3 months, 28 at 6 months, 15 at 12 months, 14 at 18 months, and 11 at 24 months and the mean PRTEE scores were 56, 36, 26, 18, 8, 9, and 6, respectively. Significant improvements in the VAS pain score and PRTEE score occurred by 1 month and continued over a period of 12 months. There was little association between the MRI scores and clinical scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous tendon recovery assessed by MRI was found during a 2-year period after PRP treatment. Improvements in the MRI scores followed and continued longer than improvements assessed by the clinical scores.

Correlations of magnetic resonance imaging classifications with preoperative functions among patients with refractory lateral epicondylitis

Background

To evaluate the correlations between three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classifications and preoperative function in patients with refractory lateral epicondylitis (LE).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with refractory LE who underwent arthroscopic treatment. Signal changes in the origin of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ERCB) were evaluated based on three different MRI classification systems. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was used to analyse the correlation between each MRI classification and the preoperative functional and visual analogue scale (VAS). The lateral collateral ligament complex (LCL) in all patients was evaluated using both MRI and arthroscopy. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for the comparison of preoperative VAS and all functional scores between patients with refractory LE combined with LCL lesions, and those without.

Results

There were 51 patients diagnosed with refractory LE between June 2014 to December 2020, all of whom were included in this study. The patients included 32 women and 19 men with a mean age of 49.1 ± 7.6 years (range, 39–60 years). The average duration of symptoms was 21.1 ± 21.2 months (range, 6–120 months). The intra-observer agreements for Steinborn et al.’s classification were 77.9%, 76.0%, and 76.7%, respectively. The inter-observer reliabilities of the three classifications were 0.734, 0.751, and 0.726, respectively. The average intra-observer agreement for the diagnosis of abnormal LCL signal was 89.9%, with an overall weighted kappa value of 0.904. The false-positive rate was 50%, and the false-negative rate was 48% for LCL evaluation on MRI. Spearman's rank correlation analysis did not find significant correlation between any of the three MRI classifications and preoperative VAS or any functional scores (all P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the VAS and functional scores between patients with abnormal LCL signals on MRI and those without LCL lesions (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Preoperative MRI findings in patients with refractory LE cannot reflect the severity of functional deficiency. Preoperative MRI grading of the origin of the ERCB and preoperative MRI for LCL signal change cannot assist the surgical plan for the treatment of patients with refractory LE.

Investigation of ligament, bone, synovial and plica pathologies accompanied by common extensor tendon in patients with lateral overuse syndrome of the elbow using magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Tendinosis in the common extensor tendon and accompanying ligament, bone, and plica abnormalities can be observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PURPOSE

To determine whether there is a difference between accompanying abnormalities according to the degree of common extensor tendon injury.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who underwent 1.5-T MRI tests with a prediagnosis of lateral overuse syndrome were retrospectively reviewed, and 56 patients who had an injury in the common extensor tendon (CET) were included. The degree of tendon and ligament injury, muscle signal change, bone marrow signal change, presence of joint effusion, and morphological features in the presence of plica were evaluated via MRI examinations of the elbow.

RESULTS

Overall, 32, 16, and eight patients had mild, moderate, and severe CET damage, respectively. As the severity of CET damage increased, the presence of joint effusion, and the presence and degree of damage to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) and radial collateral ligament (RCL) increased. The radiohumeral (RH) plica area was significantly larger in the group with mild CET damage. There was no statistically significant correlation between the severity of CET damage and the end of RH plica with a blind-end, coverage of one-third or more of the radius, its signal, thickness, and presence of olecranon fold.

CONCLUSION

As the severity of CET injury increases, damage to the LUCL, RCL, and the presence of effusion in the joint increases. RH plica should be evaluated in terms of concomitant pathology in patients with mild CET injuries on MRI.

Imaging the Postoperative Elbow

Evaluation of postoperative images of any joint can be a daunting task, and the elbow is no exception. Patients may be imaged with a complication of the repair, or the postoperative changes may be incidentally observed as the patient is imaged for other reasons. We divide the postoperative elbow into soft tissue procedures (covering ligament and tendon repairs, as well as compartmental release and nerve transposition), joint-related procedures (osteochondral lesion treatment, ostectomy, and joint replacement), and bone procedures (fracture fixation). We summarize the procedures and their indications, show normal imaging appearances, and finally cover common complications.

Radiocapitellar incongruity of the radial head in magnetic resonance imaging correlates with pathologic changes of the lateral elbow stabilizers in lateral epicondylitis

OBJECTIVE

Post-traumatic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) can be shown as radiocapitellar incongruity or posterior translation (PT) of the radial head in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We aimed to evaluate whether PT correlated with pathologic changes of lateral elbow stabilizers in patients with lateral epicondylitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In MRIs of 160 patients with lateral epicondylitis, we measured PT of the radial head in the sagittal images. We qualitatively graded five lesions of the lateral elbow structures that included common extensor tendon (CET) lesion (grade 1-3), lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) insufficiency (grade 0-2), and absence or presence of bone marrow signal change, osteochondral lesion, and calcification. We analyzed whether the PT correlated with pathologic changes of the lateral elbow stabilizers and evaluated the diagnostic value of the PT for severe lesions.

RESULTS

The average PT was 1.9 mm. The PT correlated with both the CET lesion (p < 0.001) and LCLC insufficiency (p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff values of the PT for grade 3 CET lesion and grade 2 LCLC lesion were 2.6 and 2.8 mm, respectively. When potential PLRI was defined as the PT of > 3.4mm as suggested for post-traumatic PLRI, 21 patients had potential PLRI. The positive predictive values of the PT > 3.4mm were 76% for grade 3 CET lesions and 67% for grade 2 LCLC insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that PT of the radial head correlates with pathological changes of the lateral elbow stabilizers. As radiocapitellar incongruity is easy to measure quantitatively, it can be used for screening potential PLRI in patients with lateral epicondylitis.

Clinical Assessments and MRI Findings Suggesting Early Surgical Treatment for Patients with Medial Epicondylitis

Purpose

To evaluate the MRI findings and clinical factors that are characteristic of patients who ultimately undergo surgery for medial epicondylitis.

Materials and Methods

Fifty-two consecutive patients who were diagnosed with medial epicondylitis and underwent an elbow MRI between March 2010 and December 2018 were included in this retrospective study. The patients' demographic information, clinical data, and MRI findings were evaluated. All variables were compared between the conservative treatment and surgical treatment groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify which factors were associated with surgical treatment.

Results

Common flexor tear (CFT) tear size showed a statistically significant difference in both the transverse and longitudinal planes (p < 0.001, p = 0.013). The CFT abnormality grade significantly differed in both the transverse and longitudinal planes (p = 0.022, p = 0.003). A significant difference was also found in the medial collateral ligament abnormality (p = 0.025). Logistic regression analyses showed that only the transverse diameter of the CFT tear size (odds ratio: 1.864; 95% confidence interval: 1.264-2.750) was correlated with surgical treatment.

Conclusion

Of patients diagnosed with medial epicondylitis, patients with a larger transverse CFT tear size tend to undergo surgical treatment ultimately.

Association between clinical parameters and size of three-dimensionally reconstructed anatomical abnormalities in patients with lateral epicondylitis: a cross-sectional study

Background

The association of the severity of clinical symptoms and level of functional performance with the degree of magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in patients with lateral epicondylitis has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the association between the degree of anatomical abnormalities by evaluating three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging models of the common extensor tendon and clinical parameters in patients with lateral epicondylitis.

Materials and methods

A total of 61 patients (24 men and 37 women) with lateral epicondylitis were included in this study. 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging was performed for all patients, and clinical parameters, including pain visual analog scale score, Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score, elbow range of motion, and demographic factors, were evaluated. The proportion of lesion volume of common extensor tendon was adopted for three-dimensional model analysis. To determine the factors associated with clinical parameters, univariate, and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed.

Results

The proportion of lesion volume of common extensor tendon was not associated with clinical parameters. Gender and muscle edema were independently associated with pain visual analog scale scores. However, demographic factors and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities were not associated with the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score or elbow range of motion.

Conclusions

The three-dimensional volumetric lesion size of common extensor tendon was not associated with clinical symptoms and functional performance in patients with lateral epicondylitis. The clinical parameters of lateral epicondylitis may be influenced by several factors.

Management of lateral epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis is the most common cause of lateral elbow pain. Although also known as tennis elbow, lateral epicondylitis often develops as a work-related condition and therefore constitutes a major public health issue. This article reviews the pathophysiological factors involved in lateral epicondylitis, as well as the tools available for establishing the diagnosis and ruling out other causes of lateral elbow pain. Finally, the non-operative and surgical treatment options are discussed in detail.

Current Trends for Treating Lateral Epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis, also known as 'tennis elbow', is a degenerative rather than inflammatory tendinopathy, causing chronic recalcitrant pain in elbow joints. Although most patients with lateral epicondylitis resolve spontaneously or with standard conservative management, few refractory lateral epicondylitis are candidates for alternative non-operative and operative modalities. Other than standard conservative treatments including rest, analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, orthosis and physical therapies, nonoperative treatments encompass interventional therapies include different types of injections, such as corticosteroid, lidocaine, autologous blood, platelet-rich plasma, and botulinum toxin, which are available for both short-term and long-term outcomes in pain resolution and functional improvement. In addition, newly emerging biologic enhancement products such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate and autologous tenocyte injectates are also under clinical use and investigations. Despite all non-operative therapeutic trials, persistent debilitating pain in patients with lateral epicondylitis for more than 6 months are candidates for surgical treatment, which include open, percutaneous, and arthroscopic approaches. This review addresses the current updates on emerging non-operative injection therapies as well as arthroscopic intervention in lateral epicondylitis.

The effects of regenerative injection therapy compared to corticosteroids for the treatment of lateral Epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The lateral epicondyle is a common site for chronic tendinosis (i.e. lateral epicondylitis), a condition characterized by overuse and degeneration of a tendon due to repeated microtrauma. This leads to pain and functional limitations. There is a growing interest in non-surgical forms of treatment for this condition including provision of corticosteroid injections and regenerative injection therapy (provision of autologous blood and platelet rich plasma injections).

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effectiveness of corticosteroids with regenerative injection therapy for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials published in English language from 2008 to 2018. Databases used included PEDro, Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL. Nine articles met our selection criteria. The PEDRo scale scores helped assess study quality. Cochrane risk of bias criteria helped assess bias. We analyzed results focusing on pain and function using meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Six out of 9 studies had low risk of bias. There were no short-term (1 and 2 month) differences in pain scores between the corticosteroid and regenerative injection groups. Participants receiving regenerative injections demonstrated greater long-term improvements lasting for a period of ≈2 years.

CONCLUSION

Regenerative injections provision results in greater long-term pain relief and improved function for people with lateral epicondylitis.

Optimal Elbow Positions for Identification of the Radial Collateral Ligament Using Ultrasonography

BACKGROUND

The standard position for examining the lateral elbow with ultrasonography is an "extended" or "slightly flexed" position. However, because the radial collateral ligament (RCL) is more deeply attached on the lateral epicondyle than the common extensor tendon, an anisotropic artifact of the RCL could be observed in the conventional positions, making it difficult to fully visualize the RCL.

OBJECTIVES

To determine optimal elbow positions for accurate identification of the RCL and to explore the relevant landmarks in ultrasonography.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty healthy elbows of 20 participants.

METHODS

The RCL was evaluated using ultrasonography in six elbow flexion positions (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 140°). The relative depth, defined as the depth of the capitellum subtracted by the depth of the radial head under ultrasonography, was measured at each angle. The rates of successful identification of ultrasonographic landmarks for localizing the RCL were calculated. After ultrasonography, the optimal elbow position for identifying the RCL was determined by group consensus.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Relative depth between radial head and capitellum, rates of successful identification of ultrasonographic landmarks, and consensus-based determination of the optimal angle.

RESULTS

The relative depth significantly decreased with an increase in the flexion angle (P for trend <.001), approaching zero at the angles of 90° and 120°. The rates of successful identification of the superior tubercle, hyperechogenic line, and anterior and posterior tubercles were 100%, 100%, 90%, and 80%, respectively. In the group consensus, the 90° and 120° flexion angles were selected with the highest frequency (90%; 36/40).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that elbow flexion at 90° or 120° is optimal for visualization of the RCL with the least possibility of anisotropy under ultrasonography, suggesting that the elbow should be flexed considerably beyond the conventional extended or slightly flexed position.