CT diagnosis of gallbladder adenomyomatosis: importance of enhancing mucosal epithelium, the "cotton ball sign". Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3573-3582. [PMID: 29633001 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5412-4]

Imaging update on gallbladder adenomyomatosis and its mimics

Radiologists across many imaging modalities commonly encounter gallbladder adenomyomatosis. The classic imaging appearances of gallbladder adenomyomatosis are well described and confirm benignity. However, in clinical practice, adenomyomatosis can be challenging to differentiate from other gallbladder pathologies that require cholecystectomy. In this article, we describe the common and uncommon appearances of gallbladder adenomyomatosis on multimodality imaging, helping differentiate adenomyomatosis from non-benign gallbladder abnormalities. Accurately differentiating adenomyomatosis from its mimics provides the surgical team with important clinical and surgical management information, improving patient outcomes.

Multiparametric MR imaging with diffusion-weighted, intravoxel incoherent motion, diffusion tensor, and dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion sequences to assess gallbladder wall thickening: a prospective study based on surgical histopathology

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol comprising quantitative MRI (diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion MRI) and conventional MRI in the characterization of gallbladder wall thickening (GWT).

METHODS

This prospective study comprised consecutive adults with GWT who underwent multiparametric MRI between July 2020 and April 2022. Two radiologists evaluated the MRI independently. The final diagnosis was based on surgical histopathology. The association of MRI parameters with malignant GWT was evaluated. The area under the curve (AUC) for the quantitative MRI parameters and diagnostic performance of conventional, and multiparametric MRI were compared. The interobserver agreement between two radiologists was calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (mean age, 56 years, 23 females) with GWT (25 benign and ten malignant) were evaluated. The quantitative MRI parameters significantly associated with malignant GWT were apparent diffusion coefficient on DWI (p = 0.007) and mean diffusivity (MD) on DTI (p = 0.013), perfusion fraction (f) on IVIM (p = 0.033), time to peak enhancement (TTP, p = 0.008), and wash in rate (p = 0.049) on DCE-MRI. TTP had the highest AUC of 0.790, followed by MD (0.782) and f (0.742) (p = 0.213) for predicting malignant GWT. Multiparametric MRI had significantly higher sensitivity (90% vs. 80%, p = 0.045) than conventional MRI for diagnosing malignant GWT. The two radiologists' reading had substantial to near-perfect agreement (kappa = 0.639-1) and moderate to strong correlation (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.5-0.88).

CONCLUSION

Multiparametric protocol incorporating advanced sequences improved the diagnostic performance of MRI for differentiating benign and malignant GWT.

KEY POINTS

• Multiparametric MRI had 90% sensitivity and 88% specificity for diagnosing malignant GWT, compared to 80% sensitivity and 88% specificity for conventional CE-MRI. • Among the quantitative MRI parameters, TTP (perfusion-MRI) had the highest AUC of 0.790, followed by MD (0.782) and IVIM-f (0.742). • For most quantitative MRI parameters, there was moderate to strong agreement (ICC = 0.5-0.88).

Gallbladder polyps and adenomyomatosis

Incidental findings are commonly detected during examination of the gallbladder. Differentiating benign from malignant lesions is critical because of the poor prognosis associated with gallbladder malignancy. Therefore, it is important that radiologists and sonographers are aware of common incidental gallbladder findings, which undoubtedly will continue to increase with growing medical imaging use. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality used to examine the gallbladder and biliary tree, but contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MRI are increasingly used. This review article focuses on two common incidental findings in the gallbladder; adenomyomatosis and gallbladder polyps. The imaging features of these conditions will be reviewed and compared between radiological modalities, and the pathology, epidemiology, natural history, and management will be discussed.

Current update on gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder (GB) carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy and is associated with poor prognosis. Numerous risk factors have been associated with the development of GB carcinoma. GB carcinomas may present as mass lesions replacing the GB, focal or diffuse thickening of the GB wall, and intraluminal mass in the GB. Various benign conditions can mimic GB carcinoma. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathology, clinical findings, imaging features, and management of GB carcinomas.

Imaging based flowchart for gallbladder polyp evaluation

BACKGROUND

Preoperative differentiation between neoplastic and nonneoplastic gallbladder polyps, and the subsequent indication for cholecystectomy remains a clinical dilemma. The current 1 cm size threshold for neoplasia is unspecific. The aim of this study was to improve diagnostic work-up for gallbladder polyps using sonographic and MRI characteristics of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps.

METHODS

A prospective, exploratory study including patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyp(s) was conducted. Patients underwent targeted transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and MRI. Outcomes were sensitivity and specificity for polyp diagnosis, and the radiological characteristics of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyp types. Histopathology after cholecystectomy was used as reference standard.

RESULTS

Histopathology demonstrated gallbladder polyps in 20/27 patients (74%): 14 cholesterol polyps, three adenomyomatosis, two adenomas and one gastric heterotopia. Sensitivity of polyp identification were 72% (routine TAUS) and 86% (targeted TAUS and MRI). Both adenomas were identified as neoplastic on targeted TAUS and MRI. Sonographic presentation as multiple, pedunculated polyps, either heterogeneous or with hyperechoic foci, or as single polyps containing cysts were limited to nonneoplastic polyps. On MRI hyperintense polyps on T1-weighted image were cholesterol polyps. An adenoma with high-grade dysplasia showed foci of decreased ADC values. We propose a checklist for polyp evaluation by targeted TAUS and a flowchart for radiological work-up of gallbladder polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented checklist and flowchart could aid diagnostic work-up for gallbladder polyps compared to current routine ultrasound, by elimination of nonneoplastic polyps and ultimately improve treatment decision for patients with gallbladder polyps.

A narrative review of gallbladder adenomyomatosis: what we need to know

Gallbladder adenomyomatosis (GA) is increasingly encountered in clinical practice due to increasing use of imagings especially ultrasound (US). Clinicians need to know what is the implication of this condition and its proper management. GA is a degenerative and proliferative disease characterized by excessive epithelial proliferation associated with hypertrophy of muscularis propria. This leads to outpouchings of mucosa into or beyond the muscle layer forming intramural diverticula recognized as Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses (RAS). Three types of GA are recognised: fundal, segmental and diffuse type. In fundal GA, there is focal thickening involving the GB fundus. In segmental GA, there is circumferential overgrowth of the GB wall that leads to formation of compartments. In diffuse GA, there is disseminated thickening and irregularity of the mucosa and muscularis. The pathogenesis of GA is unknown. It commonly occurs in middle age with equal sex distribution. Diagnosis of GA is by imagings showing thickened gallbladder wall containing cysts. Characteristic features are “comet-tail” artefacts and “twinkling” artefacts on US, “pearl-necklace sign” on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and “rosary sign” on computed tomography (CT). Cholecystectomy should be offered for symptomatic GA of any type. For asymptomatic GA, cholecystectomy may be considered for segmental type for its increased risk of malignancy and for diffuse type for its difficult visualization of any coexisting malignancy. Asymptomatic fundal GA can be safely observed with US. How frequent and how long should a fundal GA be monitored with US remains unknown. In case of diagnostic doubt, cholecystectomy should always be offered to avoid overlooked malignancy.

Imaging-based algorithmic approach to gallbladder wall thickening

Gallbladder (GB) wall thickening is a frequent finding caused by a spectrum of conditions. It is observed in many extracholecystic as well as intrinsic GB conditions. GB wall thickening can either be diffuse or focal. Diffuse wall thickening is a secondary occurrence in both extrinsic and intrinsic pathologies of GB, whereas, focal wall thickening is mostly associated with intrinsic GB pathologies. In the absence of specific clinical features, accurate etiological diagnosis can be challenging. The survival rate in GB carcinoma (GBC) can be improved if it is diagnosed at an early stage, especially when the tumor is confined to the wall. The pattern of wall thickening in GBC is often confused with benign diseases, especially chronic cholecystitis, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, and adenomyomatosis. Early recognition and differentiation of these conditions can improve the prognosis. In this minireview, the authors describe the patterns of abnormalities on various imaging modalities (conventional as well as advanced) for the diagnosis of GB wall thickening. This paper also illustrates an algorithmic approach for the etiological diagnosis of GB wall thickening and suggests a formatted reporting for GB wall abnormalities.

Benign gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases

Benign gallbladder diseases usually present with intraluminal lesions and localized or diffuse wall thickening. Intraluminal lesions of the gallbladder include gallstones, cholesterol polyps, adenomas, or sludge and polypoid type of gallbladder cancer must subsequently be excluded. Polyp size, stalk width, and enhancement intensity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and degree of diffusion restriction may help differentiate cholesterol polyps and adenomas from gallbladder cancer. Localized gallbladder wall thickening is largely due to segmental or focal gallbladder adenomyomatosis, although infiltrative cancer may present similarly. Identification of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses is pivotal in diagnosing adenomyomatosis. The layered pattern, degree of enhancement, and integrity of the wall are imaging clues that help discriminate innocuous thickening from gallbladder cancer. High-resolution ultrasound is especially useful for analyzing the layering of gallbladder wall. A diffusely thickened wall is frequently seen in inflammatory processes of the gallbladder. Nevertheless, it is important to check for coexistent cancer in instances of acute cholecystitis. Ultrasound used alone is limited in evaluating complicated cholecystitis and often requires complementary computed tomography. In chronic cholecystitis, preservation of a two-layered wall and weak wall enhancement are diagnostic clues for excluding malignancy. Magnetic resonance imaging in conjunction with diffusion-weighted imaging helps to differentiate xathogranulomatous cholecystitis from gallbladder cancer by identifying the presence of fat and degree of diffusion restriction. Such distinctions require a familiarity with typical imaging features of various gallbladder diseases and an understanding of the roles that assorted imaging modalities play in gallbladder evaluations.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Early Detection of Malignant Gallbladder Lesions

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative decision-making for differentiating malignant from benign lesions in the gallbladder remains challenging. We aimed to create a diagnostic nomogram to identify gallbladder cancer (GBC), especially for incidental GBC (IGBC), before surgical resection.

METHODS

A total of 587 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed gallbladder lesions from a hospital were randomly assigned to a training cohort (70%) and an internal validation cohort (30%), with 287 patients from other centers as an external validation cohort. Radiological features were developed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression model. Significant radiological features and independent clinical factors, identified by multivariate analyses, were used to construct a nomogram.

RESULTS

A diagnostic nomogram was established by age, CA19.9, and 6 radiological features. The values of area under the curve in the internal and external validation cohorts were up to 0.91 and 0.89, respectively. The calibration curves for probability of GBC showed optimal agreement between nomogram prediction and actual observation. Compared with previous methods, it demonstrated superior sensitivity (91.5%) and accuracy (85.1%) in the diagnosis of GBC. The accuracy using the nomogram was significantly higher in GBC groups compared with that by radiologists in the training cohort (P < 0.001) and similarly in each cohort. Notably, most of the IGBC, which were misdiagnosed as benign lesions, were successfully identified using this nomogram.

DISCUSSION

A novel nomogram provides a powerful tool for detecting the presence of cancer in gallbladder masses, with an increase in accuracy and sensitivity. It demonstrates an unprecedented potential for IGBC identification.

[Differential diagnosis of gallbladder abnormalities : Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Due to the high prevalence of clinically suspected cholecystitis or cholecystolithiasis the gallbladder is one of the organs examined the most by imaging.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

In most clinical settings ultrasound is the primary imaging method because of its wide availability, speed and superior spatial resolution. In cases of ambiguous findings or potential complications computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

When specific problems arise these imaging modalities may be enhanced by special techniques, e. g. contrast-enhanced ultrasound or dual-energy CT, and specific MRI sequences.

PERFORMANCE

Special variants of cholecystitis, such as xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and adenomyomatosis, may pose a particularly difficult diagnostic problem as they may resemble other diseases. Sequelae of cholecystolithiasis, such as the Mirizzi syndrome and acute bowel obstruction, may complicate the imaging algorithm as the location and the symptoms shift. Cases of neoplastic diseases of gallbladder cancer and other malignancies require a broad spectrum of imaging modalities.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Although the gallbladder can easily be examined with ultrasound, some cases require a more thorough ultrasound examination. In some cases only a combination of multiple imaging modalities yield the diagnosis. Further developments regarding technical issues and the diagnostic algorithm can be expected.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Ultrasound is the best first imaging modality. In cases of ambiguous findings or clinical complications CT or MRI are recommended.