Deep learning reconstruction for contrast-enhanced CT of the upper abdomen: similar image quality with lower radiation dose in direct comparison with iterative reconstruction

The Impact of AI on Metal Artifacts in CBCT Oral Cavity Imaging

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the impact of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven noise reduction algorithms on metal artifacts and image quality parameters in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the oral cavity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 70 patients, 61 of whom were analyzed after excluding those with severe motion artifacts. CBCT scans, performed using a Hyperion X9 PRO 13 × 10 CBCT machine, included images with dental implants, amalgam fillings, orthodontic appliances, root canal fillings, and crowns. Images were processed with the ClariCT.AI deep learning model (DLM) for noise reduction. Objective image quality was assessed using metrics such as the differentiation between voxel values (ΔVVs), the artifact index (AIx), and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Subjective assessments were performed by two experienced readers, who rated overall image quality and artifact intensity on predefined scales.

RESULTS

Compared with native images, DLM reconstructions significantly reduced the AIx and increased the CNR (p < 0.001), indicating improved image clarity and artifact reduction. Subjective assessments also favored DLM images, with higher ratings for overall image quality and lower artifact intensity (p < 0.001). However, the ΔVV values were similar between the native and DLM images, indicating that while the DLM reduced noise, it maintained the overall density distribution. Orthodontic appliances produced the most pronounced artifacts, while implants generated the least.

CONCLUSIONS

AI-based noise reduction using ClariCT.AI significantly enhances CBCT image quality by reducing noise and metal artifacts, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. Further research with larger, multicenter cohorts is recommended to validate these findings.

Deep Learning Image Reconstruction for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Planning: Image Quality, Diagnostic Performance, Contrast volume and Radiation Dose Assessment

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess image quality, contrast volume and radiation dose reduction potential and diagnostic performance with the use of high-strength deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-H) in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) planning CT.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 128 patients referred to TAVI-planning CT. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: DLIR-H group (n = 64) and conventional group (n = 64). The DLIR-H group was scanned with tube voltage of 80kVp and body weighted-dependent contrast injection rate of 28mgI/kg/s, images reconstructed using DLIR-H; the conventional group was scanned with 100kVp and contrast injection rate of 40mgI/kg/s, and images reconstructed using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V at 50% (ASIR-V 50%). Radiation dose, contrast volume, contrast injection rate, and image quality were compared between the two groups. The diagnostic performance of TAVI planning CT for coronary stenosis in 115 patients were calculated using invasive coronary angiography as golden standard.

RESULTS

DLIR-H group significantly reduced radiation dose (4.94 ± 0.39mSv vs. 7.93 ± 1.20mSv, p < 0.001), contrast dose (45.28 ± 5.38 mL vs. 63.26 ± 9.88 mL, p < 0.001), and contrast injection rate (3.1 ± 0.31 mL/s vs. 4.9 ± 0.2 mL/s, p < 0.001) compared to the conventional group. Images in DLIR-H group had significantly higher SNR and CNR (all p < 0.001). For the diagnostic performance on a per-patient basis, TAVI planning CT in the DLIR-H group provided 100% sensitivity, 92.1% specificity, 100% negative predictive value (NPV), and 84.2% positive predictive value for the detection of > 50% stenosis. In the conventional group, the corresponding results were 94.7%, 95.3%, 97.6%, and 90.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DLIR-H in TAVI-planning CT provides improved image quality with reduced radiation and contrast doses, and enables satisfactory diagnostic performance for coronary arteries stenosis.

Low-dose liver CT: image quality and diagnostic accuracy of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm

OBJECTIVES

To perform a comprehensive within-subject image quality analysis of abdominal CT examinations reconstructed with DLIR and to evaluate diagnostic accuracy compared to the routinely applied adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oncologic patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Images were reconstructed with DLIR with three intensity levels of reconstruction (high, medium, and low) and ASiR-V at strength levels from 10 to 100% with a 10% interval. Three radiologists characterized the lesions and two readers assessed diagnostic accuracy and calculated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM), and subjective image quality, the latter with a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (mean age: 70 ± 10 years, 23 men) were enrolled and 130 liver lesions (105 benign lesions, 25 metastases) were identified. DLIR_H achieved the highest SNR and CNR, comparable to ASiR-V 100% (p ≥ .051). DLIR_M returned the highest subjective image quality (score: 5; IQR: 4-5; p ≤ .001) and significant median increase (29%) in FOM (p < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm: 32/33 lesions were detected with DLIR_M and 26 lesions were detected with ASiR-V 50% (p = .031). Lesion accuracy of was 93.8% (95% CI: 88.1, 97.3; 122 of 130 lesions) for DLIR and 87.7% (95% CI: 80.8, 92.8; 114 of 130 lesions) for ASiR-V 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR yields superior image quality and provides higher diagnostic accuracy compared to ASiR-V in the assessment of hypovascular liver lesions, in particular for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy compared to iterative reconstruction in the identification of hypovascular liver lesions, especially for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.

KEY POINTS

• Iterative reconstruction algorithm impacts image texture, with negative effects on diagnostic capabilities. • Medium-strength deep learning image reconstruction algorithm outperforms iterative reconstruction in the diagnostic accuracy of ≤ 0.5 cm hypovascular liver lesions (93.9% vs 78.8%), also granting higher objective and subjective image quality. • Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm can be safely implemented in routine abdominal CT protocols in place of iterative reconstruction.

Noise-Optimized CBCT Imaging of Temporomandibular Joints-The Impact of AI on Image Quality

Background: Temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) is a common medical condition. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is effective in assessing TMD-related bone changes, but image noise may impair diagnosis. Emerging deep learning reconstruction algorithms (DLRs) could minimize noise and improve CBCT image clarity. This study compares standard and deep learning-enhanced CBCT images for image quality in detecting osteoarthritis-related degeneration in TMJs (temporomandibular joints). This study analyzed CBCT images of patients with suspected temporomandibular joint degenerative joint disease (TMJ DJD). Methods: The DLM reconstructions were performed with ClariCT.AI software. Image quality was evaluated objectively via CNR in target areas and subjectively by two experts using a five-point scale. Both readers also assessed TMJ DJD lesions. The study involved 50 patients with a mean age of 28.29 years. Results: Objective analysis revealed a significantly better image quality in DLM reconstructions (CNR levels; p < 0.001). Subjective assessment showed high inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.805) but no significant difference in image quality between the reconstruction types (p = 0.055). Lesion counts were not significantly correlated with the reconstruction type (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The analyzed DLM reconstruction notably enhanced the objective image quality in TMJ CBCT images but did not significantly alter the subjective quality or DJD lesion diagnosis. However, the readers favored DLM images, indicating the potential for better TMD diagnosis with CBCT, meriting more study.

Deep learning reconstruction vs standard reconstruction for abdominal CT: the influence of BMI

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and lesion conspicuity of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm compared with standard image reconstruction algorithms on abdominal enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning with a wide range of body mass indexes (BMIs).

METHODS

A total of 112 participants who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans were divided into three groups according to BMIs: the 80-kVp group (BMI ≤ 23.9 kg/m2), 100-kVp group (BMI 24-28.9 kg/m2), and 120-kVp group (BMI ≥ 29 kg/m2). All images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V of 50% level (IR), and DLIR at low, medium, and high levels (DL, DM, and DH, respectively). Subjective noise, artifact, overall image quality, and low- and high-contrast hepatic lesion conspicuity were all graded on a 5-point scale. The CT attenuation value (in HU), image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified and compared.

RESULTS

DM and DH improved the qualitative and quantitative parameters compared with FBP and IR for all three BMI groups. DH had the lowest image noise and highest CNR value, while DM had the highest subjective overall image quality and low- and high-contrast lesion conspicuity scores for the three BMI groups. Based on the FBP, the improvement in image quality and lesion conspicuity of DM and DH images was greater in the 80-kVp group than in the 100-kVp and 120-kVp groups.

CONCLUSION

For all BMIs, DLIR improves both image quality and hepatic lesion conspicuity, of which DM would be the best choice to balance both.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The study suggests that utilizing DLIR, particularly at the medium level, can significantly enhance image quality and lesion visibility on abdominal CT scans across a wide range of BMIs.

KEY POINTS

• DLIR improved the image quality and lesion conspicuity across a wide range of BMIs. • DLIR at medium level had the highest subjective parameters and lesion conspicuity scores among all reconstruction levels. • On the basis of the FBP, the 80-kVp group had improved image quality and lesion conspicuity more than the 100-kVp and 120-kVp groups.

Enhanced visualization in endoleak detection through iterative and AI-noise optimized spectral reconstructions

To assess the image quality parameters of dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) 40-, and 60 keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) combined with deep learning-based image reconstruction model (DLM) and iterative reconstructions (IR). CT scans of 28 post EVAR patients were enrolled. The 60 s delayed phase of DECTA was evaluated. Objective [noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)] and subjective (overall image quality and endoleak conspicuity - 3 blinded readers assessment) image quality analyses were performed. The following reconstructions were evaluated: VMI 40, 60 keV VMI; IR VMI 40, 60 keV; DLM VMI 40, 60 keV. The noise level of the DLM VMI images was approximately 50% lower than that of VMI reconstruction. The highest CNR and SNR values were measured in VMI DLM images. The mean CNR in endoleak in 40 keV was accounted for as 1.83 ± 1.2; 2.07 ± 2.02; 3.6 ± 3.26 in VMI, VMI IR, and VMI DLM, respectively. The DLM algorithm significantly reduced noise and increased lesion conspicuity, resulting in higher objective and subjective image quality compared to other reconstruction techniques. The application of DLM algorithms to low-energy VMIs significantly enhances the diagnostic value of DECTA in evaluating endoleaks. DLM reconstructions surpass traditional VMIs and IR in terms of image quality.

Diagnostic CT of colorectal cancer with artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction: A clinical evaluation

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical value of a novel deep-learning based CT reconstruction algorithm, artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR), in diagnostic imaging of colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled 217 patients with pathologically confirmed CRC. CT images were reconstructed with the AIIR algorithm and compared with those originally obtained with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). Objective image quality was evaluated in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Subjective image quality was graded on the conspicuity of tumor margin and enhancement pattern as well as the certainty in diagnosing organ invasion and regional lymphadenopathy. In patients with surgical pathology (n = 116), the performance of diagnosing visceral peritoneum invasion was characterized using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Changes of diagnostic thinking in diagnosing hepatic metastases were assessed through lesion classification confidence.

RESULTS

The SNRs and CNRs on AIIR images were significantly higher than those on HIR images (all p < 0.001). The AIIR was scored higher for all subjective metrics (all p < 0.001) except for the certainty of diagnosing regional lymphadenopathy (p = 0.467). In diagnosing visceral peritoneum invasion, higher area under curve (AUC) of the ROC was found for AIIR than HIR (0.87 vs 0.77, p = 0.001). In assessing hepatic metastases, AIIR was found capable of correcting the misdiagnosis and improving the diagnostic confidence provided by HIR (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to HIR, AIIR offers better image quality, improves the diagnostic performance regarding CRC, and thus has the potential for application in routine abdominal CT.

A Systematic Literature Review of 3D Deep Learning Techniques in Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Computed tomography (CT) is used in a wide range of medical imaging diagnoses. However, the reconstruction of CT images from raw projection data is inherently complex and is subject to artifacts and noise, which compromises image quality and accuracy. In order to address these challenges, deep learning developments have the potential to improve the reconstruction of computed tomography images. In this regard, our research aim is to determine the techniques that are used for 3D deep learning in CT reconstruction and to identify the training and validation datasets that are accessible. This research was performed on five databases. After a careful assessment of each record based on the objective and scope of the study, we selected 60 research articles for this review. This systematic literature review revealed that convolutional neural networks (CNNs), 3D convolutional neural networks (3D CNNs), and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) were the most suitable deep learning algorithms for CT reconstruction. Additionally, two major datasets appropriate for training and developing deep learning systems were identified: 2016 NIH-AAPM-Mayo and MSCT. These datasets are important resources for the creation and assessment of CT reconstruction models. According to the results, 3D deep learning may increase the effectiveness of CT image reconstruction, boost image quality, and lower radiation exposure. By using these deep learning approaches, CT image reconstruction may be made more precise and effective, improving patient outcomes, diagnostic accuracy, and healthcare system productivity.

Physical characteristics of deep learning-based image processing software in computed tomography: a phantom study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the image characteristics of deep-learning-based image processing software (DLIP; FCT PixelShine, FUJIFILM, Tokyo, Japan) and compare it with filtered back projection (FBP), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR).

METHODS

This phantom study assessed the object-specific spatial resolution (task-based transfer function [TTF]), noise characteristics (noise power spectrum [NPS]), and low-contrast detectability (low-contrast object-specific contrast-to-noise ratio [CNRLO]) at three different output doses (standard: 10 mGy; low: 3.9 mGy; ultralow: 2.0 mGy). The processing strength of DLIPFBP with A1, A4, and A9 was compared with those of FBP, MBIR, and DLR.

RESULT

The standard dose with high-contrast TTFs of DLIPFBP exceeded that of FBP. Low-contrast TTFs were comparable to or lower than that of FBP. The NPS peak frequency (fP) of DLIPFBP shifts to low spatial frequencies of up to 8.6% at ultralow doses compared to the standard FBP dose. MBIR shifted the most fP compared to FBP-a marked shift of up to 49%. DLIPFBP showed a CNRLO equal to or greater than that of DLR in standard or low doses. In contrast, the CNRLO of the DLIPFBP was equal to or lower than that of the DLR in ultralow doses.

CONCLUSION

DLIPFBP reduced image noise while maintaining a resolution similar to commercially available MBIR and DLR. The slight spatial frequency shift of fP in DLIPFBP contributed to the noise texture degradation suppression. The NPS suppression in the low spatial frequency range effectively improved the low-contrast detectability.

75% radiation dose reduction using deep learning reconstruction on low-dose chest CT

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have explored the clinical feasibility of using deep-learning reconstruction to reduce the radiation dose of CT. We aimed to compare the image quality and lung nodule detectability between chest CT using a quarter of the low dose (QLD) reconstructed with vendor-agnostic deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and conventional low-dose (LD) CT reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected 100 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 53-70 years]) who received LDCT using a dual-source scanner, where total radiation was split into a 1:3 ratio. QLD CT was generated using a quarter dose and reconstructed with DLIR (QLD-DLIR), while LDCT images were generated using a full dose and reconstructed with IR (LD-IR). Three thoracic radiologists reviewed subjective noise, spatial resolution, and overall image quality, and image noise was measured in five areas. The radiologists were also asked to detect all Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules, and their performance was evaluated using area under the jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic curve (AUFROC).

RESULTS

The median effective dose was 0.16 (IQR, 0.14-0.18) mSv for QLD CT and 0.65 (IQR, 0.57-0.71) mSv for LDCT. The radiologists' evaluations showed no significant differences in subjective noise (QLD-DLIR vs. LD-IR, lung-window setting; 3.23 ± 0.19 vs. 3.27 ± 0.22; P = .11), spatial resolution (3.14 ± 0.28 vs. 3.16 ± 0.27; P = .12), and overall image quality (3.14 ± 0.21 vs. 3.17 ± 0.17; P = .15). QLD-DLIR demonstrated lower measured noise than LD-IR in most areas (P < .001 for all). No significant difference was found between QLD-DLIR and LD-IR for the sensitivity (76.4% vs. 72.2%; P = .35) or the AUFROCs (0.77 vs. 0.78; P = .68) in detecting Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules. Under a noninferiority limit of -0.1, QLD-DLIR showed noninferior detection performance (95% CI for AUFROC difference, -0.04 to 0.06).

CONCLUSION

QLD-DLIR images showed comparable image quality and noninferior nodule detectability relative to LD-IR images.

The efficacy of low-dose CT with deep learning image reconstruction in the surveillance of incidentally detected pancreatic cystic lesions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of low-dose CT (LDCT) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for the surveillance of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) compared with standard-dose CT (SDCT) with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V).

METHODS

The study enrolled 103 patients who underwent pancreatic CT for follow-up of incidentally detected PCLs. The CT protocol included LDCT in the pancreatic phase with 40% ASIR-V, DLIR at medium (DLIR-M) and high levels (DLIR-H), and SDCT in the portal-venous phase with 40% ASIR-V. The overall image quality and conspicuity of PCLs were qualitatively assessed using five-point scales by two radiologists. The size of PCLs, presence of thickened/enhancing walls, enhancing mural nodules, and main pancreatic duct dilatation were reviewed. CT noise and cyst-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were analyzed using the chi-squared test, one-way ANOVA, and t-test. Additionally, interobserver agreement was analyzed using the kappa and weighted-kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The volume CT dose-indexes in LDCT and SDCT were 3.0 ± 0.6 mGy and 8.4 ± 2.9 mGy, respectively. LDCT with DLIR-H showed the highest overall image quality, the lowest noise, and the highest CNR. The PCL conspicuity in LDCT with either DLIR-M or DLIR-H was not significantly different from that in SDCT with ASIR-V. Other findings depicting PCLs also revealed no significant differences between LDCT with DLIR and SDCT with ASIR-V. Moreover, the results revealed good or excellent interobserver agreement.

CONCLUSION

LDCT with DLIR has a comparable performance with SDCT for the follow-up of incidentally detected PCLs.

Deep-learning CT reconstruction in clinical scans of the abdomen: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the two most common commercially available deep-learning algorithms for CT.

METHODS

We used PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science to conduct systematic searches for studies assessing the most common commercially available deep-learning CT reconstruction algorithms: True Fidelity (TF) and Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE) in the abdomen of human participants since only these two algorithms currently have adequate published data for robust systematic analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four articles fulfilled inclusion criteria. 32 studies evaluated TF and 12 studies assessed AiCE. DLR algorithms produced images with significantly less noise (22-57.3% less than IR) but preserved a desirable noise texture with increased contrast-to-noise ratios and improved lesion detectability on conventional CT. These improvements with DLR were similarly noted in dual-energy CT which was only assessed for a single vendor. Reported radiation reduction potential was 35.1-78.5%. Nine studies assessed observer performance with the two dedicated liver lesion studies being performed on the same vendor reconstruction (TF). These two studies indicate preserved low contrast liver lesion detection (> 5 mm) at CTDIvol 6.8 mGy (BMI 23.5 kg/m2) to 12.2 mGy (BMI 29 kg/m2). If smaller lesion detection and improved lesion characterization is needed, a CTDIvol of 13.6-34.9 mGy is needed in a normal weight to obese population. Mild signal loss and blurring have been reported at high DLR reconstruction strengths.

CONCLUSION

Deep learning reconstructions significantly improve image quality in CT of the abdomen. Assessment of other dose levels and clinical indications is needed. Careful choice of radiation dose levels is necessary, particularly for small liver lesion assessment.

Evaluation of Image Quality and Detectability of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) Algorithm in Single- and Dual-energy CT

This study is aimed to evaluate effects of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on image quality in single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT), in reference to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V). The Gammex 464 phantom was scanned in SECT and DECT modes at three dose levels (5, 10, and 20 mGy). Raw data were reconstructed using six algorithms: filtered back-projection (FBP), ASIR-V at 40% (AV-40) and 100% (AV-100) strength, and DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high strength (DLIR-H), to generate SECT 120kVp images and DECT 120kVp-like images. Objective image quality metrics were computed, including noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d'). Subjective image quality evaluation, including image noise, texture, sharpness, overall quality, and low- and high-contrast detectability, was performed by six readers. DLIR-H reduced overall noise magnitudes from FBP by 55.2% in a more balanced way of low and high frequency ranges comparing to AV-40, and improved the TTF values at 50% for acrylic inserts by average percentages of 18.32%. Comparing to SECT 20 mGy AV-40 images, the DECT 10 mGy DLIR-H images showed 20.90% and 7.75% improvement in d' for the small-object high-contrast and large-object low-contrast tasks, respectively. Subjective evaluation showed higher image quality and better detectability. At 50% of the radiation dose level, DECT with DLIR-H yields a gain in objective detectability index compared to full-dose AV-40 SECT images used in daily practice.

Application of Deep Learning-Based Denoising Technique for Radiation Dose Reduction in Dynamic Abdominal CT: Comparison with Standard-Dose CT Using Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Method

The purpose is to evaluate whether deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithm provides sufficient image quality for abdominal computed tomography (CT) with a 30% reduction in radiation dose, compared to standard-dose CT reconstructed with conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). The subjects consisted of 50 patients who underwent abdominal CT with standard dose and reconstructed with hybrid IR (ASiR-V50%) and another 50 patients who underwent abdominal CT with approximately 30% less dose and reconstructed with ASiR-V50% and DLD at low-, medium- and high-strength (DLD-L, DLD-M and DLD-H, respectively). The standard deviation of attenuation in liver parenchyma was measured as image noise. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for portal vein on portal venous phase was calculated. Lesion conspicuity in 23 abdominal solid mass on the reduced-dose CT was rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (best) to -4 (markedly inferior). Compared with hybrid IR of standard-dose CT, DLD-H of reduced-dose CT provided significantly lower image noise (portal phase: 9.0 (interquartile range, 8.7-9.4) HU vs 12.0 (11.4-12.7) HU, P < 0.0001) and significantly higher CNR (median, 5.8 (4.4-7.4) vs 4.3 (3.3-5.3), P = 0.0019). As for DLD-M of reduced-dose CT, no significant difference was found in image noise and CNR compared to hybrid IR of standard-dose CT (P > 0.99). Lesion conspicuity scores for DLD-H and DLD-M were significantly better than hybrid IR (P < 0.05). Dynamic contrast-enhanced abdominal CT acquired with approximately 30% lower radiation dose and generated with the DLD algorithm exhibit lower image noise and higher CNR compared to standard-dose CT with hybrid IR.

Fast and low-dose medical imaging generation empowered by hybrid deep-learning and iterative reconstruction

Fast and low-dose reconstructions of medical images are highly desired in clinical routines. We propose a hybrid deep-learning and iterative reconstruction (hybrid DL-IR) framework and apply it for fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fast positron emission tomography (PET), and low-dose computed tomography (CT) image generation tasks. First, in a retrospective MRI study (6,066 cases), we demonstrate its capability of handling 3- to 10-fold under-sampled MR data, enabling organ-level coverage with only 10- to 100-s scan time; second, a low-dose CT study (142 cases) shows that our framework can successfully alleviate the noise and streak artifacts in scans performed with only 10% radiation dose (0.61 mGy); and last, a fast whole-body PET study (131 cases) allows us to faithfully reconstruct tumor-induced lesions, including small ones (<4 mm), from 2- to 4-fold-accelerated PET acquisition (30-60 s/bp). This study offers a promising avenue for accurate and high-quality image reconstruction with broad clinical value.

Current and potential applications of artificial intelligence in medical imaging practice: A narrative review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Artificial intelligence (AI) is present in many areas of our lives. Much of the digital data generated in health care can be used for building automated systems to bring improvements to existing workflows and create a more personalised healthcare experience for patients. This review outlines select current and potential AI applications in medical imaging practice and provides a view of how diagnostic imaging suites will operate in the future. Challenges associated with potential applications will be discussed and healthcare staff considerations necessary to benefit from AI-enabled solutions will be outlined.

METHODS

Several electronic databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and University College Dublin Library Database, were used to identify relevant articles with a Boolean search strategy. Textbooks, government sources and vendor websites were also considered.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

Many AI-enabled solutions in radiographic practice are available with more automation on the horizon. Traditional workflow will become faster, more effective, and more user friendly. AI can handle administrative or technical types of work, meaning it is applicable across all aspects of medical imaging practice.

CONCLUSION

AI offers significant potential to automate most of the manual tasks, ensure service consistency, and improve patient care. Radiographers, radiation therapists, and clinicians should ensure they have adequate understanding of the technology to enable ethical oversight of its implementation.

Deep Learning Image Reconstruction for CT: Technical Principles and Clinical Prospects

Filtered back projection (FBP) has been the standard CT image reconstruction method for 4 decades. A simple, fast, and reliable technique, FBP has delivered high-quality images in several clinical applications. However, with faster and more advanced CT scanners, FBP has become increasingly obsolete. Higher image noise and more artifacts are especially noticeable in lower-dose CT imaging using FBP. This performance gap was partly addressed by model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Yet, its "plastic" image appearance and long reconstruction times have limited widespread application. Hybrid iterative reconstruction partially addressed these limitations by blending FBP with MBIR and is currently the state-of-the-art reconstruction technique. In the past 5 years, deep learning reconstruction (DLR) techniques have become increasingly popular. DLR uses artificial intelligence to reconstruct high-quality images from lower-dose CT faster than MBIR. However, the performance of DLR algorithms relies on the quality of data used for model training. Higher-quality training data will become available with photon-counting CT scanners. At the same time, spectral data would greatly benefit from the computational abilities of DLR. This review presents an overview of the principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications of DLR, including metal artifact reduction algorithms. In addition, emerging applications and prospects are discussed.

Is it possible to use low-dose deep learning reconstruction for the detection of liver metastases on CT routinely?

OBJECTIVES

To compare the image quality and hepatic metastasis detection of low-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with full-dose filtered back projection (FBP)/iterative reconstruction (IR).

METHODS

A contrast-detail phantom consisting of low-contrast objects was scanned at five CT dose index levels (10, 6, 3, 2, and 1 mGy). A total of 154 participants with 305 hepatic lesions who underwent abdominal CT were enrolled in a prospective non-inferiority trial with a three-arm design based on phantom results. Data sets with full dosage (13.6 mGy) and low dosages (9.5, 6.8, or 4.1 mGy) were acquired from two consecutive portal venous acquisitions, respectively. All images were reconstructed with FBP (reference), IR (control), and DLIR (test). Eleven readers evaluated phantom data sets for object detectability using a two-alternative forced-choice approach. Non-inferiority analyses were performed to interpret the differences in image quality and metastasis detection of low-dose DLIR relative to full-dose FBP/IR.

RESULTS

The phantom experiment showed the dose reduction potential from DLIR was up to 57% based on the reference FBP dose index. Radiation decreases of 30% and 50% resulted in non-inferior image quality and hepatic metastasis detection with DLIR compared to full-dose FBP/IR. Radiation reduction of 70% by DLIR performed inferiorly in detecting small metastases (< 1 cm) compared to full-dose FBP (difference: -0.112; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.178 to 0.047) and full-dose IR (difference: -0.123; 95% CI: -0.182 to 0.053) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DLIR enables a 50% dose reduction for detecting low-contrast hepatic metastases while maintaining comparable image quality to full-dose FBP and IR.

KEY POINTS

• Non-inferiority study showed that deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) can reduce the dose to oncological patients with low-contrast lesions without compromising the diagnostic information. • Radiation dose levels for DLIR can be reduced to 50% of full-dose FBP and IR for detecting low-contrast hepatic metastases, while maintaining comparable image quality. • The reduction of radiation by 70% by DLIR is clinically acceptable but insufficient for detecting small low-contrast hepatic metastases (< 1 cm).

Improving spatial resolution and diagnostic confidence with thinner slice and deep learning image reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate image quality and diagnostic confidence improvement using a thin slice and a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT.

METHODS

Forty patients with hepatic lesions in enhanced abdominal CT were retrospectively analyzed. Images in the portal phase were reconstructed at 5 mm and 1.25 mm slice thickness using the 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) (ASIR-V50%) and at 1.25 mm using DLIR at medium (DLIR-M) and high (DLIR-H) settings. CT number and standard deviation of the hepatic parenchyma, spleen, portal vein, and subcutaneous fat were measured, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Edge-rise-slope (ERS) was measured on the portal vein to reflect spatial resolution and the CT number skewness on liver parenchyma was calculated to reflect image texture. Two radiologists blindly assessed the overall image quality including subjective noise, image contrast, visibility of small structures using a 5-point scale, and object sharpness and lesion contour using a 4-point scale.

RESULTS

For the 1.25-mm images, DLIR significantly reduced image noise, improved CNR and overall subjective image quality compared to ASIR-V50%. Compared to the 5-mm ASIR-V50% images, DLIR images had significantly higher scores in the visibility and contour for small structures and lesions; as well as significantly higher ERS and lower CT number skewness. At a quarter of the signal strength, the 1.25-mm DLIR-H images had a similar subjective noise score as the 5-mm ASIR-V50% images.

CONCLUSION

DLIR significantly reduces image noise and maintains a more natural image texture; image spatial resolution and diagnostic confidence can be improved using thin slice images and DLIR in abdominal CT.

KEY POINTS

• DLIR further reduces image noise compared with ASIR-V while maintaining favorable image texture. • In abdominal CT, thinner slice images improve image spatial resolution and small object visualization but suffer from higher image noise. • Thinner slice images combined with DLIR in abdominal CT significantly suppress image noise for detecting low-density lesions while significantly improving image spatial resolution and overall image quality.

Ultra-low-dose CT lung screening with artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction: evaluation via automatic nodule-detection software

AIM

To test the feasibility of ultra-low-dose (ULD) computed tomography (CT) combined with an artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR) algorithm for screening pulmonary nodules using computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A chest phantom with artificial pulmonary nodules was first scanned using the routine protocol and the ULD protocol (3.28 versus 0.18 mSv) to compare the image quality and to test the acceptability of the ULD CT protocol. Next, 147 lung-screening patients were enrolled prospectively, undergoing an additional ULD CT immediately after their routine CT examination for clinical validation. Images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), the AIIR, and were imported to the CAD software for preliminary nodule detection. Subjective image quality on the phantom was scored using a five-point scale and compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Nodule detection using CAD was evaluated for ULD HIR and AIIR images using the routine dose image as reference.

RESULTS

Higher image quality was scored for AIIR than for FBP and HIR at ULD (p<0.001). As reported by CAD, 107 patients were presented with more than five nodules on routine dose images and were chosen to represent the challenging cases at an early stage of pulmonary disease. Among such, the performance of nodule detection by CAD on ULD HIR and AIIR images was 75.2% and 92.2% of the routine dose image, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Combined with AIIR, it was feasible to use an ULD CT protocol with 95% dose reduction for CAD-based screening of pulmonary nodules.

Measurement Accuracy and Repeatability of RECIST-Defined Pulmonary Lesions and Lymph Nodes in Ultra-Low-Dose CT Based on Deep Learning Image Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) improves image quality. We aimed to compare the measured diameter of pulmonary lesions and lymph nodes between DLIR-based ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) and contrast-enhanced CT.

METHODS

The consecutive adult patients with noncontrast chest ULDCT (0.07-0.14 mSv) and contrast-enhanced CT (2.38 mSv) were prospectively enrolled. Patients with poor image quality and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 were excluded. The diameter of pulmonary target lesions and lymph nodes defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was measured. The measurement variability between ULDCT and enhanced CT was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The 141 enrolled patients (62 ± 12 years) had 89 RECIST-defined measurable pulmonary target lesions (including 30 malignant lesions, mainly adenocarcinomas) and 45 measurable mediastinal lymph nodes (12 malignant). The measurement variation of pulmonary lesions between high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) images of ULDCT and contrast-enhanced CT was 2.2% (95% CI: 1.7% to 2.6%) and the variation of lymph nodes was 1.4% (1.0% to 1.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The measured diameters of pulmonary lesions and lymph nodes in DLIR-H images of ULDCT are highly close to those of contrast-enhanced CT. DLIR-based ULDCT may facilitate evaluating target lesions with greatly reduced radiation exposure in tumor evaluation and lung cancer screening.

Quantitative and qualitative assessments of deep learning image reconstruction in low-keV virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a novel deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) technique for dual-energy CT (DECT) derived virtual monoenergetic (VM) images compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) in low kiloelectron volt (keV) images.

METHODS

We analyzed 30 venous phase acute abdominal DECT (80/140 kVp) scans. Data were reconstructed to ASIR-V and DLIR-High at four different keV levels (40, 50, 74, and 100) with 1- and 3-mm slice thickness. Quantitative Hounsfield unit (HU) and noise assessment were measured within the liver, aorta, fat, and muscle. Subjective assessment of image noise, sharpness, texture, and overall quality was performed by two board-certified radiologists.

RESULTS

DLIR reduced image noise by 19.9-35.5% (p < 0.001) compared to ASIR-V in all reconstructions at identical keV levels. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) increased by 49.2-53.2% (p < 0.001) in DLIR 40-keV images compared to ASIR-V 50 keV, while no significant difference in noise was identified except for 1 and 3 mm in aorta and for 1-mm liver measurements, where ASIR-V 50 keV showed 5.5-6.8% (p < 0.002) lower noise levels. Qualitative assessment demonstrated significant improvement particularly in 1-mm reconstructions (p < 0.001). Lastly, DLIR 40 keV demonstrated comparable or improved image quality ratings when compared to ASIR-V 50 keV (p < 0.001 to 0.22).

CONCLUSION

DLIR significantly reduced image noise compared to ASIR-V. Qualitative assessment showed that DLIR significantly improved image quality particularly in thin sliced images. DLIR may facilitate 40 keV as a new standard for routine low-keV VM reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT.

KEY POINTS

• DLIR enables 40 keV as the routine low-keV VM reconstruction. • DLIR significantly reduced image noise compared to ASIR-V, across a wide range of keV levels in VM DECT images. • In low-keV VM reconstructions, improvements in image quality using DLIR were most evident and consistent in 1-mm sliced images.

Deep learning versus iterative reconstruction on image quality and dose reduction in abdominal CT: a live animal study

Objective. While simulated low-dose CT images and phantom studies cannot fully approximate subjective and objective effects of deep learning (DL) denoising on image quality, live animal models may afford this assessment. This study is to investigate the potential of DL in CT dose reduction on image quality compared to iterative reconstruction (IR). Approach. The upper abdomen of a live 4 year old sheep was scanned on a CT scanner at different exposure levels. Images were reconstructed using FBP and ADMIRE with 5 strengths. A modularized DL network with 5 modules was used for image reconstruction via progressive denoising. Radiomic features were extracted from a region over the liver. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was applied to quantify agreement between any two sets of radiomic features. Coefficient of variation was calculated to measure variation in a radiomic feature series. Structural similarity index (SSIM) was used to measure the similarity between any two images. Diagnostic quality, low-contrast detectability, and image texture were qualitatively evaluated by two radiologists. Pearson correlation coefficient was computed across all dose-reconstruction/denoising combinations. Results. A total of 66 image sets, with 405 radiomic features extracted from each, are analyzed. IR and DL can improve diagnostic quality and low-contrast detectability and similarly modulate image texture features. In terms of SSIM, DL has higher potential in preserving image structure. There is strong correlation between SSIM and radiologists’ evaluations for diagnostic quality (0.559) and low-contrast detectability (0.635) but moderate correlation for texture (0.313). There is moderate correlation between CCC of radiomic features and radiologists’ evaluation for diagnostic quality (0.397), low-contrast detectability (0.417), and texture (0.326), implying that improvement of image features may not relate to improvement of diagnostic quality. Conclusion. DL shows potential to further reduce radiation dose while preserving structural similarity, while IR is favored by radiologists and more predictably alters radiomic features.

Comparison of a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm with Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Pediatric Abdominopelvic CT

Objective

To compare a deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) algorithm for pediatric abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms.

Materials and Methods

Post-contrast abdominopelvic CT scans obtained from 120 pediatric patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 8.7 ± 5.2 years; 60 males) between May 2020 and October 2020 were evaluated in this retrospective study. Images were reconstructed using FBP, a hybrid IR algorithm (ASiR-V) with blending factors of 50% and 100% (AV50 and AV100, respectively), and a DLR algorithm (TrueFidelity) with three strength levels (low, medium, and high). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and edge rise distance (ERD) were used to evaluate noise characteristics and spatial resolution, respectively. Image noise, edge definition, overall image quality, lesion detectability and conspicuity, and artifacts were qualitatively scored by two pediatric radiologists, and the scores of the two reviewers were averaged. A repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare NPS and ERD among the six reconstruction methods. The Friedman rank sum test followed by the Nemenyi-Wilcoxon-Wilcox all-pairs test was used to compare the results of the qualitative visual analysis among the six reconstruction methods.

Results

The NPS noise magnitude of AV100 was significantly lower than that of the DLR, whereas the NPS peak of AV100 was significantly higher than that of the high- and medium-strength DLR (p < 0.001). The NPS average spatial frequencies were higher for DLR than for ASiR-V (p < 0.001). ERD was shorter with DLR than with ASiR-V and FBP (p < 0.001). Qualitative visual analysis revealed better overall image quality with high-strength DLR than with ASiR-V (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

For pediatric abdominopelvic CT, the DLR algorithm may provide improved noise characteristics and better spatial resolution than the hybrid IR algorithm.

Deep learning reconstruction allows low-dose imaging while maintaining image quality: comparison of deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT

We aimed to compare the radiation dose and image quality of a low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT) protocol reconstructed with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with those of a routine-dose protocol reconstructed with hybrid-iterative reconstruction. This retrospective study enrolled 71 patients [61 men; average age, 71.9 years; mean body mass index (BMI), 24.3 kg/m2] who underwent both low-dose abdominal CT with DLR [advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE)] and routine-dose abdominal CT with hybrid-iterative reconstruction [adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D)]. Radiation dose parameters included volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), effective dose (ED), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Mean image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Image noise was measured in the hepatic parenchyma and bilateral erector spinae muscles. Moreover, subjective assessment of perceived image quality and diagnostic acceptability was performed. The low-dose protocol helped reduce the CTDIvol by 44.3%, ED by 43.7%, and SSDE by 44.9%. Moreover, the noise was significantly lower and CNR significantly higher with the low-dose protocol than with the normal-dose protocol (P<0.001). In the subjective assessment of image quality, there was no significant difference between the protocols with regard to image noise. Overall, AiCE was superior to AIDR 3D in terms of diagnostic acceptability (P=0.001). The use of AiCE can reduce overall radiation dose by more than 40% without loss of image quality compared to routine-dose abdominal CT with AIDR 3D.

Reduced-Dose Deep Learning Reconstruction for Abdominal CT of Liver Metastases

Background Assessment of liver lesions is constrained as CT radiation doses are lowered; evidence suggests deep learning reconstructions mitigate such effects. Purpose To evaluate liver metastases and image quality between reduced-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and standard-dose filtered back projection (FBP) contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Materials and Methods In this prospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study (September 2019 through April 2021), participants with biopsy-proven colorectal cancer and liver metastases at baseline CT underwent standard-dose and reduced-dose portal venous abdominal CT in the same breath hold. Three radiologists detected and characterized lesions at standard-dose FBP and reduced-dose DLIR, reported confidence, and scored image quality. Contrast-to-noise ratios for liver metastases were recorded. Summary statistics were reported, and a generalized linear mixed model was used. Results Fifty-one participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 57 years ± 13; 31 men) were evaluated. The mean volume CT dose index was 65.1% lower with reduced-dose CT (12.2 mGy) than with standard-dose CT (34.9 mGy). A total of 161 lesions (127 metastases, 34 benign lesions) with a mean size of 0.7 cm ± 0.3 were identified. Subjective image quality of reduced-dose DLIR was superior to that of standard-dose FBP (P < .001). The mean contrast-to-noise ratio for liver metastases of reduced-dose DLIR (3.9 ± 1.7) was higher than that of standard-dose FBP (3.5 ± 1.4) (P < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions 0.5 cm or smaller: 63 of 65 lesions detected with standard-dose FBP (96.9%; 95% CI: 89.3, 99.6) and 47 lesions with reduced-dose DLIR (72.3%; 95% CI: 59.8, 82.7). Lesion accuracy with standard-dose FBP and reduced-dose DLIR was 80.1% (95% CI: 73.1, 86.0; 129 of 161 lesions) and 67.1% (95% CI: 59.3, 74.3; 108 of 161 lesions), respectively (P = .01). Lower lesion confidence was reported with a reduced dose (P < .001). Conclusion Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) improved CT image quality at 65% radiation dose reduction while preserving detection of liver lesions larger than 0.5 cm. Reduced-dose DLIR demonstrated overall inferior characterization of liver lesions and reader confidence. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03151564 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

First Performance Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection System for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation in Dual-Source Photon-Counting Detector CT at Different Low-Dose Levels

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality (IQ) and performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) system in photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) for pulmonary nodule evaluation at different low-dose levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anthropomorphic chest-phantom containing 14 pulmonary nodules of different sizes (range, 3-12 mm) was imaged on a PCD-CT and on a conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). Scans were performed with each of the 3 vendor-specific scanning modes (QuantumPlus [Q+], Quantum [Q], and High Resolution [HR]) at decreasing matched radiation dose levels (volume computed tomography dose index ranging from 1.79 to 0.31 mGy) by adapting IQ levels from 30 to 5. Image noise was measured manually in the chest wall at 8 different locations. Subjective IQ was evaluated by 2 readers in consensus. Nodule detection and volumetry were performed using a commercially available AI-CAD system.

RESULTS

Subjective IQ was superior in PCD-CT compared with EID-CT (P < 0.001), and objective image noise was similar in the Q+ and Q-mode (P > 0.05) and superior in the HR-mode (PCD 55.8 ± 11.7 HU vs EID 74.8 ± 5.4 HU; P = 0.01). High resolution showed the lowest image noise values among PCD modes (P = 0.01). Overall, the AI-CAD system delivered comparable results for lung nodule detection and volumetry between PCD- and dose-matched EID-CT (P = 0.08-1.00), with a mean sensitivity of 95% for PCD-CT and of 86% for dose-matched EID-CT in the lowest evaluated dose level (IQ5). Q+ and Q-mode showed higher false-positive rates than EID-CT at lower-dose levels (IQ10 and IQ5). The HR-mode showed a sensitivity of 100% with a false-positive rate of 1 even at the lowest evaluated dose level (IQ5; CDTIvol, 0.41 mGy).

CONCLUSIONS

Photon-counting detector CT was superior to dose-matched EID-CT in subjective IQ while showing comparable to lower objective image noise. Fully automatized AI-aided nodule detection and volumetry are feasible in PCD-CT, but attention has to be paid to false-positive findings.

Deep-learning image reconstruction for image quality evaluation and accurate bone mineral density measurement on quantitative CT: A phantom-patient study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the image quality and accurate bone mineral density (BMD) on quantitative CT (QCT) for osteoporosis screening by deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) based on a multi-phantom and patient study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

High-contrast spatial resolution, low-contrast detectability, modulation function test (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and image noise were evaluated for physical image quality on Caphan 500 phantom. Three calcium hydroxyapatite (HA) inserts were used for accurate BMD measurement on European Spine Phantom (ESP). CT images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-veo 50% (ASiR-V50%), and three levels of DLIR(L/M/H). Subjective evaluation of the image high-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability were compared visually by qualified radiologists, whilst the statistical difference in the objective evaluation of the image high-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability, image noise, and relative measurement error were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Cohen's kappa coefficient (k) was performed to determine the interobserver agreement in qualitative evaluation between two radiologists.

RESULTS

Overall, for three levels of DLIR, 50% MTF was about 4.50 (lp/cm), better than FBP (4.12 lp/cm) and ASiR-V50% (4.00 lp/cm); the 2 mm low-contrast object was clearly resolved at a 0.5% contrast level, while 3mm at FBP and ASiR-V50%. As the strength level decreased and radiation dose increased, DLIR at three levels showed a higher NPS peak frequency and lower noise level, leading to leftward and rightward shifts, respectively. Measured L1, L2, and L3 were slightly lower than that of nominal HA inserts (44.8, 95.9, 194.9 versus 50.2, 100.6, 199.2mg/cm³) with a relative measurement error of 9.84%, 4.08%, and 2.60%. Coefficients of variance for the L1, L2, and L3 HA inserts were 1.51%, 1.41%, and 1.18%. DLIR-M and DLIR-H scored significantly better than ASiR-V50% in image noise (4.83 ± 0.34, 4.50 ± 0.50 versus 4.17 ± 0.37), image contrast (4.67 ± 0.73, 4.50 ± 0.70 versus 3.80 ± 0.99), small structure visibility (4.83 ± 0.70, 4.17 ± 0.73 versus 3.83 ± 1.05), image sharpness (3.83 ± 1.12, 3.53 ± 0.90 versus 3.27 ± 1.16), and artifacts (3.83 ± 0.90, 3.42 ± 0.37 versus 3.10 ± 0.83). The CT value, image noise, contrast noise ratio, and image artifacts in DLIR-M and DLIR-H outperformed ASiR-V50% and FBP (P<0.001), whilst it showed no statistically significant between DLIR-L and ASiR-V50% (P>0.05). The prevalence of osteoporosis was 74 (24.67%) in women and 49 (11.79%) in men, whilst the osteoporotic vertebral fracture rate was 26 (8.67%) in women and (5.29%) in men.

CONCLUSION

Image quality with DLIR was high-qualified without affecting the accuracy of BMD measurement. It has a potential clinical utility in osteoporosis screening.

Radiation dose reduction with deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography

Objectives

Deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) offers unique opportunities for reducing image noise without degrading image quality or diagnostic accuracy in coronary CT angiography (CCTA). The present study aimed at exploiting the capabilities of DLIR to reduce radiation dose and assess its impact on stenosis severity, plaque composition analysis, and plaque volume quantification.

Methods

This prospective study includes 50 patients who underwent two sequential CCTA scans at normal-dose (ND) and lower-dose (LD). ND scans were reconstructed with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) 100%, and LD scans with DLIR. Image noise (in Hounsfield units, HU) and quantitative plaque volumes (in mm³) were assessed quantitatively. Stenosis severity was visually categorized into no stenosis (0%), stenosis (< 20%, 20–50%, 51–70%, 71–90%, 91–99%), and occlusion (100%). Plaque composition was classified as calcified, non-calcified, or mixed.

Results

Reduction of radiation dose from ND scans with ASiR-V 100% to LD scans with DLIR at the highest level (DLIR-H; 1.4 mSv vs. 0.8 mSv, p < 0.001) had no impact on image noise (28 vs. 27 HU, p = 0.598). Reliability of stenosis severity and plaque composition was excellent between ND scans with ASiR-V 100% and LD scans with DLIR-H (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.995 and 0.974, respectively). Comparison of plaque volumes using Bland–Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of − 0.8 mm³ (± 2.5 mm³) and limits of agreement between − 5.8 and + 4.1 mm³.

Conclusion

DLIR enables a reduction in radiation dose from CCTA by 43% without significant impact on image noise, stenosis severity, plaque composition, and quantitative plaque volume.

Key Points

•Deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) enables radiation dose reduction by over 40% for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

•Image noise remains unchanged between a normal-dose CCTA reconstructed by ASiR-V and a lower-dose CCTA reconstructed by DLIR.

•There is no impact on the assessment of stenosis severity, plaque composition, and quantitative plaque volume between the two scans.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08367-x.

Image quality assessment of pediatric chest and abdomen CT by deep learning reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Efforts to reduce the radiation dose have continued steadily, with new reconstruction techniques. Recently, image denoising algorithms using artificial neural networks, termed deep learning reconstruction (DLR), have been applied to CT image reconstruction to overcome the drawbacks of iterative reconstruction (IR). The purpose of our study was to compare the objective and subjective image quality of DLR and IR on pediatric abdomen and chest CT images.

METHODS

This retrospective study included pediatric body CT images from February 2020 to October 2020, performed on 51 patients (34 boys and 17 girls; age 1-18 years). Non-contrast chest CT (n = 16), contrast-enhanced chest CT (n = 12), and contrast-enhanced abdomen CT (n = 23) images were included. Standard 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) images were compared to images with 100% ASIR-V and DLR at medium and high strengths. Attenuation, noise, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), and signal to noise (SNR) measurements were performed. Overall image quality, artifacts, and noise were subjectively assessed by two radiologists using a four-point scale (superior, average, suboptimal, and unacceptable). A phantom scan was performed including the dose range of the clinical images used in our study, and the noise power spectrum (NPS) was calculated. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

DLR had better CNR and SNR than 50% ASIR-V in both pediatric chest and abdomen CT images. When compared with 50% ASIR-V, high strength DLR was associated with noise reduction in non-contrast chest CT (33.0%), contrast-enhanced chest CT (39.6%), and contrast-enhanced abdomen CT (38.7%) with increases in CNR at 149.1%, 105.8%, and 53.1% respectively. The subjective assessment of overall image quality and the noise was also better on DLR images (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in artifacts between reconstruction methods. From NPS analysis, DLR methods showed a pattern of reducing the magnitude of noise while maintaining the texture.

CONCLUSION

Compared with 50% ASIR-V, DLR improved pediatric body CT images with significant noise reduction. However, artifacts were not improved by DLR, regardless of strength.

Comparison of image quality and lesion diagnosis in abdominopelvic unenhanced CT between reduced-dose CT using deep learning post-processing and standard-dose CT using iterative reconstruction: A prospective study

PURPOSE

To compare image quality and lesion diagnosis between reduced-dose abdominopelvic unenhanced computed tomography (CT) using deep learning (DL) post-processing and standard-dose CT using iterative reconstruction (IR).

METHOD

Totally 251 patients underwent two consecutive abdominopelvic unenhanced CT scans of the same range, including standard and reduced doses, respectively. In group A, standard-dose data were reconstructed by (blend 30 %) IR. In group B, reduced-dose data were reconstructed by filtered back projection reconstruction to obtain group B1 images, and post-processed using the DL algorithm (NeuAI denosing, Neusoft medical, Shenyang, China) with 50 % and 100 % weights to obtain group B2 and B3 images, respectively. Then, CT values of the liver, the second lumbar vertebral centrum, the erector spinae and abdominal subcutaneous fat were measured. CT values, noise levels, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), radiation doses and subjective scores of image quality were compared. Subjective evaluations of low-density liver lesions were compared by diagnostic results from enhanced CT or Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

RESULTS

Groups B3 and B1 showed the lowest and highest noise levels, respectively (P < 0.001). The SNR and CNR in group B3 were highest (P < 0.001). The radiation dose in group B was reduced by 71.5 % on average compared to group A. Subjective scores in groups A and B2 were highest (P < 0.001). Diagnostic sensitivity and confidence for liver metastases in groups A and B2 were highest (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced-dose abdominopelvic unenhanced CT combined with DL post-processing could ensure image quality and satisfy diagnostic needs.