Impacts of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V and Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithms on Robustness of CT Radiomics Features: Opportunity for Minimizing Radiomics Variability Among Scans of Different Dose Levels

This study aims to investigate the influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on CT radiomics feature robustness. A standardized phantom was scanned under single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) modes at standard and low (20 and 10 mGy) dose levels. Images of SECT 120 kVp and corresponding DECT 120 kVp-like virtual monochromatic images were generated with filtered back-projection (FBP), ASIR-V at 40% (AV-40) and 100% (AV-100) blending levels, and DLIR algorithm at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H) strength levels. Ninety-four features were extracted via Pyradiomics. Reproducibility of features was calculated between standard and low dose levels, between reconstruction algorithms in reference to FBP images, and within scan mode, using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The average percentage of features with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90 between the two dose levels was 21.28% and 20.75% in AV-40 images, and 39.90% and 35.11% in AV-100 images, respectively, and increased from 15.43 to 45.22% and from 15.43 to 44.15% with an increasing strength level of DLIR. The average percentage of features with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90 in reference to FBP images was 26.07% and 25.80% in AV-40 images, and 18.88% and 18.62% in AV-100 images, respectively, and decreased from 27.93 to 17.82% and from 27.66 to 17.29% with an increasing strength level of DLIR. DLIR and ASIR-V algorithms showed low reproducibility in reference to FBP images, while the high-strength DLIR algorithm provides an opportunity for minimizing radiomics variability due to dose reduction.

The prognostic value of myocardial salvage index by cardiac magnetic resonance in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of myocardial salvage index (MSI) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data to identify primary studies reporting MSI in STEMI patients with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprised of death, myocardial reinfarction, and congestive heart failure. The MSI and MACE rates were pooled. The bias of risk was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. The evidence level was rated based on the meta-analysis of hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of MSI for predicting MACE.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included covering twelve unique cohorts. Eleven cohorts measured MSI using T2-weighted imaging and T1-weighted late gadolinium enhancement, while one cohort applied T2-mapping and T1-mapping. The pooled MSI (95% CI) was 44% (39 to 49%; 11 studies, 2946 patients), and the pooled MACE rate (95% CI) was 10% (7 to 14%; 12 studies, 311/3011 events/patients). Seven prognostic studies overall showed low risk of bias. The HR (95% CI) per 1% increase of MSI for MACE was 0.95 (0.92 to 0.98; 5 studies, 150/885 events/patients), and HR (95% CI) of MSI < median versus MSI > median for MACE was 5.62 (3.74 to 8.43; 6 studies, 166/1570 events/patients), both rated as weak evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI presents potential in predicting MACE in STEMI patients. The prognostic value of MSI using advanced CMR techniques for adverse cardiovascular events needs further investigation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Seven studies supported the MSI to serve as a predictor for MACE in STEMI patients, indicating its potential as a risk stratification tool to help manage expectations for these patients in clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled infarct size (95% CI) and area at risk (95% CI) were 21% (18 to 23%; 11 studies, 2783 patients) and 38% (34 to 43%; 10 studies, 2022 patients), respectively. • The pooled rates (95% CI) of cardiac mortality, myocardial reinfarction, and congestive heart failure were 2% (1 to 3%; 11 studies, 86/2907 events/patients), 4% (3 to 6%; 12 studies, 127/3011 events/patients), and 3% (1 to 5%; 12 studies, 94/3011 events/patients), respectively. • The HRs (95% CI) per 1% increase of MSI for cardiac mortality and congestive heart failure were 0.93 (0.91 to 0.96; 1 study, 14/202 events/patients) and 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99; 1 study, 11/104 events/patients), respectively, but the prognostic value of MSI for myocardial re-infraction has not been measured.

Improving lesion conspicuity in abdominal dual-energy CT with deep learning image reconstruction: a prospective study with five readers

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and lesion conspicuity in abdominal dual-energy CT (DECT) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared to those using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (Asir-V) at 50% blending (AV-50), and to identify potential factors impacting lesion conspicuity.

METHODS

The portal-venous phase scans in abdominal DECT of 47 participants with 84 lesions were prospectively included. The raw data were reconstructed to virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) at 50 keV using filtered back-projection (FBP), AV-50, and DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high strength (DLIR-H). A noise power spectrum (NPS) was generated. CT number and standard deviation values of eight anatomical sites were measured. Signal-to-noise (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were calculated. Five radiologists assessed image quality in terms of image contrast, image noise, image sharpness, artificial sensation, and diagnostic acceptability, and evaluated the lesion conspicuity.

RESULTS

DLIR further reduced image noise (p < 0.001) compared to AV-50 while better preserved the average NPS frequency (p < 0.001). DLIR maintained CT number values (p > 0.99) and improved SNR and CNR values compared to AV-50 (p < 0.001). DLIR-H and DLIR-M showed higher ratings in all image quality analyses than AV-50 (p < 0.001). DLIR-H provided significantly better lesion conspicuity than AV-50 and DLIR-M regardless of lesion size, relative CT attenuation to surrounding tissue, or clinical purpose (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR-H could be safely recommended for routine low-keV VMI reconstruction in daily contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT to improve image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and lesion conspicuity.

KEY POINTS

• DLIR is superior to AV-50 in noise reduction, with less shifts of the average spatial frequency of NPS towards low frequency, and larger improvements of NPS noise, noise peak, SNR, and CNR values. • DLIR-M and DLIR-H generate better image quality in terms of image contrast, noise, sharpness, artificial sensation, and diagnostic acceptability than AV-50, while DLIR-H provides better lesion conspicuity than AV-50 and DLIR-M. • DLIR-H could be safely recommended as a new standard for routine low-keV VMI reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT to provide better lesion conspicuity and better image quality than the standard AV-50.

Evaluation of Image Quality and Detectability of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) Algorithm in Single- and Dual-energy CT

This study is aimed to evaluate effects of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on image quality in single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT), in reference to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V). The Gammex 464 phantom was scanned in SECT and DECT modes at three dose levels (5, 10, and 20 mGy). Raw data were reconstructed using six algorithms: filtered back-projection (FBP), ASIR-V at 40% (AV-40) and 100% (AV-100) strength, and DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high strength (DLIR-H), to generate SECT 120kVp images and DECT 120kVp-like images. Objective image quality metrics were computed, including noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d'). Subjective image quality evaluation, including image noise, texture, sharpness, overall quality, and low- and high-contrast detectability, was performed by six readers. DLIR-H reduced overall noise magnitudes from FBP by 55.2% in a more balanced way of low and high frequency ranges comparing to AV-40, and improved the TTF values at 50% for acrylic inserts by average percentages of 18.32%. Comparing to SECT 20 mGy AV-40 images, the DECT 10 mGy DLIR-H images showed 20.90% and 7.75% improvement in d' for the small-object high-contrast and large-object low-contrast tasks, respectively. Subjective evaluation showed higher image quality and better detectability. At 50% of the radiation dose level, DECT with DLIR-H yields a gain in objective detectability index compared to full-dose AV-40 SECT images used in daily practice.

An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation

OBJECTIVE

To conduct an overview of meta-analyses of radiomics studies assessing their study quality and evidence level.

METHODS

A systematical search was updated via peer-reviewed electronic databases, preprint servers, and systematic review protocol registers until 15 November 2022. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of primary radiomics studies were included. Their reporting transparency, methodological quality, and risk of bias were assessed by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist, AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews, version 2) tool, and ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tool, respectively. The evidence level supporting the radiomics for clinical use was rated.

RESULTS

We identified 44 systematic reviews with meta-analyses on radiomics research. The mean ± standard deviation of PRISMA adherence rate was 65 ± 9%. The AMSTAR-2 tool rated 5 and 39 systematic reviews as low and critically low confidence, respectively. The ROBIS assessment resulted low, unclear and high risk in 5, 11, and 28 systematic reviews, respectively. We reperformed 53 meta-analyses in 38 included systematic reviews. There were 3, 7, and 43 meta-analyses rated as convincing, highly suggestive, and weak levels of evidence, respectively. The convincing level of evidence was rated in (1) T2-FLAIR radiomics for IDH-mutant vs IDH-wide type differentiation in low-grade glioma, (2) CT radiomics for COVID-19 vs other viral pneumonia differentiation, and (3) MRI radiomics for high-grade glioma vs brain metastasis differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic reviews on radiomics were with suboptimal quality. A limited number of radiomics approaches were supported by convincing level of evidence.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The evidence supporting the clinical application of radiomics are insufficient, calling for researches translating radiomics from an academic tool to a practicable adjunct towards clinical deployment.

A systematic review of radiomics in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): the potential of analysis on individual radiomics feature for identifying genuine promising imaging biomarkers

PURPOSE

To systematically assess the quality of radiomics research in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) and to test the feasibility of analysis at the level of radiomics feature.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data to identify articles of GCTB radiomics until 31 July 2022. The studies were assessed by radiomics quality score (RQS), transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement, checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging (CLAIM), and modified quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The radiomic features selected for model development were documented.

RESULTS

Nine articles were included. The average of the ideal percentage of RQS, the TRIPOD adherence rate and the CLAIM adherence rate were 26%, 56%, and 57%, respectively. The risk of bias and applicability concerns were mainly related to the index test. The shortness in external validation and open science were repeatedly emphasized. In GCTB radiomics models, the gray level co-occurrence matrix features (40%), first order features (28%), and gray-level run-length matrix features (18%) were most selected features out of all reported features. However, none of the individual feature has appeared repeatably in multiple studies. It is not possible to meta-analyze radiomics features at present.

CONCLUSION

The quality of GCTB radiomics studies is suboptimal. The reporting of individual radiomics feature data is encouraged. The analysis at the level of radiomics feature has potential to generate more practicable evidence for translating radiomics into clinical application.

Robustness of radiomics features of virtual unenhanced and virtual monoenergetic images in dual-energy CT among different imaging platforms and potential role of CT number variability

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate robustness of dual-energy CT (DECT) radiomics features of virtual unenhanced (VUE) image and virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) among different imaging platforms.

METHODS

A phantom with sixteen clinical-relevant densities was scanned on ten DECT platforms with comparable scan parameters. Ninety-four radiomic features were extracted via Pyradiomics from VUE images and VMIs at energy level of 70 keV (VMI_70keV). Test-retest repeatability was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Inter-platform reproducibility of VUE images and VMI_70keV was evaluated by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD) among platforms, and by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between platform pairs. The correlation between variability of CT number radiomics reproducibility was estimated.

RESULTS

92.02% and 92.87% of features were repeatable between scan-rescans for VUE images and VMI_70keV, respectively. Among platforms, 11.30% and 28.39% features of VUE images, and 15.16% and 28.99% features of VMI_70keV were with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%. The average percentages of radiomics features with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90 between platform pairs were 10.00% and 9.86% in VUE images and 11.23% and 11.23% in VMI_70keV. The CT number inter-platform reproducibility using CV and QCD showed negative correlations with percentage of the first-order radiomics features with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%, in both VUE images and VMI_70keV (r² 0.3870-0.6178, all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of DECT radiomics features were non-reproducible. The differences in CT number were considered as an indicator of inter-platform DECT radiomics variation. Critical relevance statement: The majority of radiomics features extracted from the VUE images and the VMI70keV were non-reproducible among platforms, while synchronizing energy levels of VMI to reduce the CT number value variability may be a potential way to mitigate radiomics instability.