1
|
Albano D, Messina C, Gitto S, Fusco S, Sconfienza LM, Bellelli A. US/CT fusion imaging and virtual navigation to guide lumbar intradiscal oxygen-ozone therapy: a pilot study. J Ultrasound 2024; 27:291-296. [PMID: 38102520 PMCID: PMC11178682 DOI: 10.1007/s40477-023-00835-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To test the feasibility of US/CT fusion imaging to guide lumbar intradiscal O2/O3 therapy to treat discogenic degenerative low back pain due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS We retrospectively included consecutive patients affected by low back pain and/or sciatica due to LDH resistant to conservative therapies, who underwent to lumbar intradiscal O2/O3 injection under CT/US fusion imaging guidance (Fusion Group) and standard CT guidance (Control Group). For each procedure, we collected procedure operative time, room utilization time, number of CT passes, complications, and O2/O3 intradiscal diffusion adequacy. Technical success was defined as the ability to complete the procedure as initially planned to reach the disc. Technical efficacy was based on O2/O3 intradiscal diffusion adequacy, as demonstrated by the last CT scan. RESULTS Six patients (4 males; mean age: 68 ± 15 years) were included in the Fusion group, six (4 males; mean age: 66 ± 12 years) in Control group. No complications were observed in both groups. In Fusion group we found significantly lower room utilization time (30 ± 6 min vs. 46 ± 10 min, p = 0.008), procedure operative time (14 ± 3 min vs. 24 ± 6 min, p = 0.008), and number of CT passes (2 [2,2] vs. 3 [3,3], p = 0.006) than in Control Group, respectively. Technical success and efficacy were 100% in both Groups. CONCLUSION CT/US fusion imaging seems to be a feasible and safe guidance for intradiscal O2/O3 injections, allowing decrease of procedure time and number of CT passes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gitto
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Fusco
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Bellelli
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli San Pietro, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dalili D, Holzwanger DJ, Fleming JW, Igbinoba Z, Dalili DE, Beall DP, Isaac A, Yoon ES. Advanced Interventional Procedures for Knee Osteoarthritis: What Is the Current Evidence? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2024; 28:267-281. [PMID: 38768592 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1781432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the highest among all joints and likely to increase over the coming decades. Advances in the repertoire of diagnostic capabilities of imaging and an expansion in the availability and range of image-guided interventions has led to development of more advanced interventional procedures targeting pain related to OA pain while improving the function of patients presenting with this debilitating condition. We review the spectrum of established advanced interventional procedures for knee OA, describe the techniques used to perform these procedures safely, and discuss the clinical evidence supporting each of them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danoob Dalili
- Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre (SWLEOC), Dorking Road, Epsom, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Dorking Road, Epsom, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel J Holzwanger
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Jacob W Fleming
- Comprehensive Specialty Care, Edmond, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Zenas Igbinoba
- Department of Radiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Daniel E Dalili
- Department of Radiology, Southend University Hospital, Mid and South Essex NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas P Beall
- Comprehensive Specialty Care, Edmond, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Amanda Isaac
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Edward S Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Albano D, Messina C, Gitto S, Chianca V, Sconfienza LM. Bone biopsies guided by augmented reality: a pilot study. Eur Radiol Exp 2023; 7:40. [PMID: 37468652 PMCID: PMC10356701 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-023-00353-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To test the technical feasibility of an augmented reality (AR) navigation system to guide bone biopsies. METHODS We enrolled patients subjected to percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided bone biopsy using a novel AR navigation system. Data from prospectively enrolled patients (AR group) were compared with data obtained retrospectively from previous standard CT-guided bone biopsies (control group). We evaluated the following: procedure duration, number of CT passes, patient's radiation dose (dose-length product), complications, and specimen adequacy. Technical success was defined as the ability to complete the procedure as planned, reaching the target center. Technical efficacy was assessed evaluating specimen adequacy. RESULTS Eight patients (4 males) aged 58 ± 24 years (mean ± standard deviation) were enrolled in the AR group and compared with 8 controls (4 males) aged 60 ± 15 years. No complications were observed. Procedure duration, number of CT passes, and radiation dose were 22 ± 5 min, 4 (median) [4, 6 interquartile range] and 1,034 ± 672 mGy*cm for the AR group and 23 ± 5 min, 9 [7.75, 11.25], and 1,954 ± 993 mGy*cm for controls, respectively. No significant differences were observed for procedure duration (p = 0.878). Conversely, number of CT passes and radiation doses were significantly lower for the AR group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively). Technical success and technical efficacy were 100% for both groups. CONCLUSIONS This AR navigation system is safe, feasible, and effective; it can decrease radiation exposure and number of CT passes during bone biopsies without increasing duration time. RELEVANCE STATEMENT This augmented reality (AR) navigation system is a safe and feasible guidance for bone biopsies; it may ensure a decrease in the number of CT passes and patient's radiation dose. KEY POINTS • This AR navigation system is a safe guidance for bone biopsies. • It ensures decrease of number of CT passes and patient's radiation exposure. • Procedure duration was similar to that of standard CT-guided biopsy. • Technical success was 100% as in all patients the target was reached. • Technical efficacy was 100% as the specimen was adequate in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, 20161, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gitto
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, 20161, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Vito Chianca
- Clinica Di Radiologia EOC IIMSI, Lugano, Switzerland
- Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Via Argine 604, Naples, 80147, Italy
| | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, 20161, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, 20122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Imaging-Guided Musculoskeletal Interventions in the Lower Limb. Radiol Clin North Am 2023; 61:393-404. [PMID: 36739153 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2022.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Imaging guidance is essential for musculoskeletal interventional procedures performed in the lower limb. A strong evidence supports the use of imaging guidance to improve safety, accuracy, and effectiveness of these interventions. Joints, tendons, bursae, and nerves can be effectively approached especially with ultrasound-guided injections. Here, we discuss evidence and technique of the most common image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the lower limb.
Collapse
|
5
|
Fukui S, Rokutanda R, Kawaai S, Suda M, Iwata F, Okada M, Kishimoto M. Current evidence and practical knowledge for ultrasound-guided procedures in rheumatology: Joint aspiration, injection, and other applications. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101832. [PMID: 37248141 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound (US)-guided procedures have increasingly gained their role in the daily practice of rheumatology, owing to the growing evidence supporting their utility. The utilization of US guidance in procedures may enhance their accuracy, efficacy, and safety. This article presents a comprehensive review of the current evidence and practical knowledge pertaining to US-guided procedures in rheumatology, encompassing joint aspirations, injections, and other applications such as tendon sheath injections. We provide a detailed description of the US-guided procedure process and compare the in-plane and out-of-plane view methods, along with practical techniques based on existing evidence or our own expertise. For each joint, we summarize how to perform procedures with figures to facilitate a better understanding. Additionally, we introduce other applications of US-guided procedures for tendons, enthesis, bursae, and nerves as well as emerging therapies such as US-guided fascia hydrorelease. By utilizing these US techniques, rheumatologists can achieve the ability to manage a wider range of musculoskeletal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sho Fukui
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, MA, USA; Department of Emergency and General Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Ryo Rokutanda
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Kawaai
- Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masei Suda
- Department of Rheumatology, Suwa Central Hospital, Nagano, Japan
| | - Futoshi Iwata
- Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Okada
- Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsumasa Kishimoto
- Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Drakonaki EE, Martinoli C, Vanhoenacker FM, Detoraki A, Dalili DE, Adriaensen M. The Beauty of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound: Spot Diagnoses. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2023; 195:385-392. [PMID: 36630982 DOI: 10.1055/a-1965-9961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ultrasound is a powerful technique in musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging, and it can replace MR imaging in many specific clinical scenarios. This article will feature some common and less common spot diagnoses in musculoskeletal ultrasound. SPOT DIAGNOSIS Cases were collected by members of the Educational Committee of the ESSR ( European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology) with expertise in musculoskeletal ultrasound. Sixteen clinical entities are discussed based on the features that allow US spot diagnosis. CONCLUSION Clinical history, location, and ultrasound appearance are the keys to spot diagnoses when performing musculoskeletal ultrasound. KEY POINTS · Musculoskeletal ultrasound can be the primary and only modality in common spot diagnoses in specific clinical settings.. · Clinical history, location, and ultrasound appearance are keys to spot diagnoses.. · Knowledge of spot diagnoses in musculoskeletal ultrasound facilitates daily clinical practice.. CITATION FORMAT · Drakonaki EE, Martinoli C, Vanhoenacker FM et al. The Beauty of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound: Spot Diagnoses. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1965-9961.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena E Drakonaki
- Department of Anatomy, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece.,Department of MSK imaging, Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound Practice, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Carlo Martinoli
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Filip Maria Vanhoenacker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium.,Department of Radiology, AZ Sint-Maarten Duffel-Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Anna Detoraki
- Medical School, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Daniel E Dalili
- Department of Radiology, Southend University Hospital, Mid and South Essex NHS Trust, Essex, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Miraude Adriaensen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Albano D, Gitto S, Serpi F, Aliprandi A, Maria Sconfienza L, Messina C, Messina C. Ultrasound-guided Musculoskeletal Interventional Procedures Around the Hip: A Practical Guide. J Ultrason 2023; 23:15-22. [PMID: 36880006 PMCID: PMC9985185 DOI: 10.15557/jou.2023.0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Several studies have shown that ultrasound guidance may contribute to improved safety, effectiveness and accuracy of musculoskeletal interventional procedures performed around the hip if compared to those performed with a landmark-guided technique. Different approaches and injectates can be used for treating hip musculoskeletal disorders. These procedures may involve injections in the hip joint, periarticular bursae, tendons, and peripheral nerves. Intra-articular hip injections are mostly used as a conservative approach for treating patients affected by hip osteoarthritis. Ultrasound-guided injection of the iliopsoas bursa is performed in patients with bursitis and/or tendinopathy, to treat those with painful prosthesis due to iliopsoas impingement, or when the lidocaine test is indicated to identify the iliopsoas as a source of pain. Ultrasound-guided interventions are routinely used in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome having as target the gluteus medius/minimus tendons and/or the trochanteric bursae. Ultrasound-guided fenestration and platelet-rich plasma injection are applied in patients with hamstring tendinopathy with good clinical outcomes. Last but not least, ultrasound-guided perineural injections can be used for peripheral neuropathies or blocks of the sciatic, lateral femoral cutaneous, and pudendal nerves. In this paper, we discuss the evidence and technical tips for musculoskeletal interventional procedures performed around the hip, highlighting the added value of ultrasound as an imaging guidance modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Albano
- Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gitto
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesca Serpi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Carmelo Messina
- Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
deSouza NM, van der Lugt A, Deroose CM, Alberich-Bayarri A, Bidaut L, Fournier L, Costaridou L, Oprea-Lager DE, Kotter E, Smits M, Mayerhoefer ME, Boellaard R, Caroli A, de Geus-Oei LF, Kunz WG, Oei EH, Lecouvet F, Franca M, Loewe C, Lopci E, Caramella C, Persson A, Golay X, Dewey M, O'Connor JPB, deGraaf P, Gatidis S, Zahlmann G. Standardised lesion segmentation for imaging biomarker quantitation: a consensus recommendation from ESR and EORTC. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:159. [PMID: 36194301 PMCID: PMC9532485 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01287-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lesion/tissue segmentation on digital medical images enables biomarker extraction, image-guided therapy delivery, treatment response measurement, and training/validation for developing artificial intelligence algorithms and workflows. To ensure data reproducibility, criteria for standardised segmentation are critical but currently unavailable. METHODS A modified Delphi process initiated by the European Imaging Biomarker Alliance (EIBALL) of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Imaging Group was undertaken. Three multidisciplinary task forces addressed modality and image acquisition, segmentation methodology itself, and standards and logistics. Devised survey questions were fed via a facilitator to expert participants. The 58 respondents to Round 1 were invited to participate in Rounds 2-4. Subsequent rounds were informed by responses of previous rounds. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS Items with ≥ 75% consensus are considered a recommendation. These include system performance certification, thresholds for image signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise and tumour-to-background ratios, spatial resolution, and artefact levels. Direct, iterative, and machine or deep learning reconstruction methods, use of a mixture of CE marked and verified research tools were agreed and use of specified reference standards and validation processes considered essential. Operator training and refreshment were considered mandatory for clinical trials and clinical research. Items with a 60-74% agreement require reporting (site-specific accreditation for clinical research, minimal pixel number within lesion segmented, use of post-reconstruction algorithms, operator training refreshment for clinical practice). Items with ≤ 60% agreement are outside current recommendations for segmentation (frequency of system performance tests, use of only CE-marked tools, board certification of operators, frequency of operator refresher training). Recommendations by anatomical area are also specified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandita M deSouza
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Aad van der Lugt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Luc Bidaut
- College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK
| | - Laure Fournier
- INSERM, Radiology Department, AP-HP, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, PARCC, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Lena Costaridou
- School of Medicine, University of Patras, University Campus, Rio, 26 500, Patras, Greece
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elmar Kotter
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marius E Mayerhoefer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Caroli
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Edwin H Oei
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederic Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manuela Franca
- Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Christian Loewe
- Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department for Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Caroline Caramella
- Radiology Department, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Institut d'Oncologie Thoracique, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
| | - Anders Persson
- Department of Radiology, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Xavier Golay
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marc Dewey
- Department of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - James P B O'Connor
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Pim deGraaf
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sergios Gatidis
- Department of Radiology, University of Tubingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gudrun Zahlmann
- Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Oak Brook, IL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D, Alcala-Galiano A, Allen G, Aparisi Gómez MP, Aringhieri G, Bazzocchi A, Beggs I, Chianca V, Corazza A, Dalili D, De Dea M, Del Cura JL, Di Pietto F, Drakonaki E, Facal de Castro F, Filippiadis D, Gitto S, Grainger AJ, Greenwood S, Gupta H, Ivanoski S, Khanna M, Klauser A, Mansour R, Martin S, Mascarenhas V, Mauri G, McCarthy C, McKean D, McNally E, Melaki K, Messina C, Miron Mombiela R, Moutinho R, Olchowy C, Orlandi D, Prada González R, Prakash M, Posadzy M, Rutkauskas S, Snoj Ž, Tagliafico AS, Talaska A, Tomas X, Vasilevska Nikodinovska V, Vucetic J, Wilson D, Zaottini F, Zappia M, Isaac A. Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part VII, nerves of the lower limb. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:1456-1464. [PMID: 34581843 PMCID: PMC8831230 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08283-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform a Delphi-based consensus on published evidence on image-guided interventional procedures for peripheral nerves of the lower limb (excluding Morton's neuroma) and provide clinical indications. METHODS We report the results of a Delphi-based consensus of 53 experts from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology who reviewed the published literature for evidence on image-guided interventional procedures offered around peripheral nerves in the lower limb (excluding Morton's neuroma) to derive their clinical indications. Experts drafted a list of statements and graded them according to the Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence. Consensus was considered strong when > 95% of experts agreed with the statement or broad when > 80% but < 95% agreed. The results of the Delphi-based consensus were used to write the paper. RESULTS Nine statements on image-guided interventional procedures for peripheral nerves of the lower limb have been drafted. All of them received strong consensus. Image-guided pudendal nerve block is safe, effective, and well tolerated with few complications. US-guided perisciatic injection of anesthetic provides good symptom relief in patients with piriformis syndrome; however, the addition of corticosteroids to local anesthetics still has an unclear role. US-guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block can be used to provide effective post-operative regional analgesia. CONCLUSION Despite the promising results reported by published papers on image-guided interventional procedures for peripheral nerves of the lower limb, there is still a lack of evidence on the efficacy of most procedures. KEY POINTS • Image-guided pudendal nerve block is safe, effective, and well tolerated with few complications. • US-guided perisciatic injection of anesthetic provides good symptom relief in patients with piriformis syndrome; however, the addition of corticosteroids to local anesthetics still has an unclear role. • US-guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block can be used to provide effective post-operative regional analgesia. The volume of local anesthetic affects the size of the blocked sensory area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche Per La Salute, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
| | - Miraude Adriaensen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Heerlen, Brunssum, Kerkrade, the Netherlands
| | - Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Sezione Di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento Di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze E Diagnostica Avanzata, Università Degli Studi Di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Georgina Allen
- St Luke's Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Vithas Nueve de Octubre, Valencia, Spain
| | - Giacomo Aringhieri
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Vito Chianca
- Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Napoli, Italy
- Clinica Di Radiologia EOC IIMSI, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | - Danoob Dalili
- South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre (SWLEOC), Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Francesco Di Pietto
- Dipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
| | | | | | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON" Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Haidari/Athens, Greece
| | - Salvatore Gitto
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche Per La Salute, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Slavcho Ivanoski
- Department of Radiology, Special Hospital for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology St. Erazmo, Ohrid, North Macedonia
- Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | | | - Andrea Klauser
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ramy Mansour
- Oxford Musculoskeletal Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Vasco Mascarenhas
- Hospital da Luz, Musculoskeletal Imaging Unit, Lisbon, Portugal
- AIRC, Advanced imaging research consortium, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Giovanni Mauri
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | | | - David McKean
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
| | | | - Kalliopi Melaki
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Ricardo Moutinho
- Hospital da Luz, Musculoskeletal Imaging Unit, Lisbon, Portugal
- Hospital de Loulé, Loulé, Portugal
| | - Cyprian Olchowy
- Department of Oral Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Davide Orlandi
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Evangelico Internazionale, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Mahesh Prakash
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Saulius Rutkauskas
- Department of Radiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Žiga Snoj
- Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Xavier Tomas
- Radiology Dpt. MSK Unit. Hospital Clinic (CDIC), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Violeta Vasilevska Nikodinovska
- Clinical Center "Mother Theresa", University Institute of Radiology, Skopje, North Macedonia
- Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Jelena Vucetic
- Radiology Department, Hospital ICOT Ciudad de Telde, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | | | - Marcello Zappia
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
- Varelli Institute, Naples, Italy
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Amanda Isaac
- South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre (SWLEOC), Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|