Motion artifact removal in coronary CT angiography based on generative adversarial networks

Use of AI in Cardiac CT and MRI: A Scientific Statement from the ESCR, EuSoMII, NASCI, SCCT, SCMR, SIIM, and RSNA

Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising solutions for many steps of the cardiac imaging workflow, from patient and test selection through image acquisition, reconstruction, and interpretation, extending to prognostication and reporting. Despite the development of many cardiac imaging AI algorithms, AI tools are at various stages of development and face challenges for clinical implementation. This scientific statement, endorsed by several societies in the field, provides an overview of the current landscape and challenges of AI applications in cardiac CT and MRI. Each section is organized into questions and statements that address key steps of the cardiac imaging workflow, including ethical, legal, and environmental sustainability considerations. A technology readiness level range of 1 to 9 summarizes the maturity level of AI tools and reflects the progression from preliminary research to clinical implementation. This document aims to bridge the gap between burgeoning research developments and limited clinical applications of AI tools in cardiac CT and MRI.

Oncologic Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning Methods in CT Spine Imaging-A Systematic Review

In spinal oncology, integrating deep learning with computed tomography (CT) imaging has shown promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and patient outcomes. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on artificial intelligence (AI) applications in CT imaging for spinal tumors. A PRISMA-guided search identified 33 studies: 12 (36.4%) focused on detecting spinal malignancies, 11 (33.3%) on classification, 6 (18.2%) on prognostication, 3 (9.1%) on treatment planning, and 1 (3.0%) on both detection and classification. Of the classification studies, 7 (21.2%) used machine learning to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, 3 (9.1%) evaluated tumor stage or grade, and 2 (6.1%) employed radiomics for biomarker classification. Prognostic studies included three (9.1%) that predicted complications such as pathological fractures and three (9.1%) that predicted treatment outcomes. AI's potential for improving workflow efficiency, aiding decision-making, and reducing complications is discussed, along with its limitations in generalizability, interpretability, and clinical integration. Future directions for AI in spinal oncology are also explored. In conclusion, while AI technologies in CT imaging are promising, further research is necessary to validate their clinical effectiveness and optimize their integration into routine practice.

The influence of motion-compensated reconstruction on coronary artery analysis for a dual-layer detector CT system: a dynamic phantom study

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac motion artifacts hinder the assessment of coronary arteries in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We investigated the impact of motion compensation reconstruction (MCR) on motion artifacts in CCTA at various heart rates (HR) using a dynamic phantom.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An artificial hollow coronary artery (5-mm diameter lumen) filled with iodinated contrast agent (400 HU at 120 kVp), positioned centrally in an anthropomorphic chest phantom, was scanned using a dual-layer spectral detector CT. The artery was translated at constant horizontal velocities (0-80 mm/s, increment of 10 mm/s). For each velocity, five CCTA scans were repeated using a clinical protocol. Motion artifacts were quantified using the in-plane motion area. Regression analysis was performed to calculate the reduction in motion artifacts provided by MCR, by division of the slopes of non-MCR and MCR fitted lines.

RESULTS

Reference mean (95% confidence interval) motion artifact area was 24.9 mm2 (23.8, 26.0). Without MCR, motion artifact areas for velocities exceeding 20 mm/s were significantly larger (up to 57.2 mm2 (40.1, 74.2)) than the reference. With MCR, no significant differences compared to the reference were shown for all velocities, except for 70 mm/s (29.0 mm2 (27.0, 31.0)). The slopes of the fitted data were 0.44 and 0.04 for standard and MCR reconstructions, respectively, resulting in an 11-time motion artifact reduction.

CONCLUSION

MCR may improve CCTA assessment in patients by reducing coronary artery motion artifacts, especially in those with elevated HR who cannot receive beta blockers or do not attain the targeted HR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This vendor-specific motion compensation reconstruction may improve coronary computed tomography angiography assessment in patients by reduction of coronary artery motion artifacts, especially in those with elevated various heart rates (HR) who cannot receive beta blockers or do not attain the targeted HR.

KEY POINTS

• Motion artifacts are known to hinder the assessment of coronary arteries on coronary CT angiography (CCTA), leading to more non-diagnostic scans. • This dynamic phantom study shows that motion compensation reconstruction (MCR) reduces motion artifacts at various velocities, which may help to decrease the number of non-diagnostic scans. • MCR in this study showed to reduce motion artifacts 11-fold.

Motion artifact correction in cardiac CT using cross-phase temporospatial information and synergistic attention gate and spatial transformer sub-networks

Objectives.To improve quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images using a generalizable motion-correction algorithm.Approach. A neural network with attention gate and spatial transformer (ATOM) was developed to correct coronary motion. Phantom and patient CCTA images (39 males, 32 females, age range 19-92, scan date 02/2020 to 10/2021) retrospectively collected from dual-source CT were used to create training, development, and testing sets corresponding to 140- and 75 ms temporal resolution, with 75 ms images as labels. To test generalizability, ATOM was deployed for locally adaptive motion-correction in both 140- and 75 ms patient images. Objective metrics were used to assess motion-corrupted and corrected phantom and patient images, including structural-similarity-index (SSIM), dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC), peak-signal-noise-ratio (PSNR), and normalized root-mean-square-error (NRMSE). In objective quality assessment, ATOM was compared with several baseline networks, including U-net, U-net plus attention gate, U-net plus spatial transformer, VDSR, and ResNet. Two cardiac radiologists independently interpreted motion-corrupted and -corrected images at 75 and 140 ms in a blinded fashion and ranked diagnostic image quality (worst to best: 1-4, no ties).Main results. ATOM improved quality metrics (p< 0.05) before/after correction: in phantom, SSIM 0.87/0.95, DSC 0.85/0.93, PSNR 19.4/22.5, NRMSE 0.38/0.27; in patient images, SSIM 0.82/0.88, DSC 0.88/0.90, PSNR 30.0/32.0, NRMSE 0.16/0.12. ATOM provided more consistent improvement of objective image quality, compared to the presented baseline networks. The motion-corrected images received better ranks than un-corrected at the same temporal resolution (p< 0.05): 140 ms images 1.65/2.25, and 75 ms images 3.1/3.2. The motion-corrected 75 ms images received the best rank in 65% of testing cases. A fair-to-good inter-reader agreement was observed (Kappa score 0.58).Significance. ATOM reduces motion artifacts, improving visualization of coronary arteries. This algorithm can be used to virtually improve temporal resolution in both single- and dual-source CT.

Enhancing coronary artery plaque analysis via artificial intelligence-driven cardiovascular computed tomography

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive imaging modality of cardiac structures and vasculature considered comparable to invasive coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) in several major cardiovascular guidelines. Conventional image acquisition, processing, and analysis of CCTA imaging have progressed significantly in the past decade through advances in technology, computation, and engineering. However, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analysis of CCTA further drives past the limitations of conventional CCTA, allowing for greater achievements in speed, consistency, accuracy, and safety. AI-driven CCTA (AI-CCTA) has achieved a significant reduction in radiation exposure for patients, allowing for high-quality scans with sub-millisievert radiation doses. AI-CCTA has demonstrated comparable accuracy and consistency in manual coronary artery calcium scoring against expert human readers. An advantage over invasive coronary angiography, which provides luminal information only, CCTA allows for plaque characterization, providing detailed information on the quality of plaque and offering further prognosticative value for the management of CAD. Combined with AI, many recent studies demonstrate the efficacy, accuracy, efficiency, and precision of AI-driven analysis of CCTA imaging for the evaluation of CAD, including assessing degree stenosis, adverse plaque characteristics, and CT fractional flow reserve. The limitations of AI-CCTA include its early phase in investigation, the need for further improvements in AI modeling, possible medicolegal implications, and the need for further large-scale validation studies. Despite these limitations, AI-CCTA represents an important opportunity for improving cardiovascular care in an increasingly advanced and data-driven world of modern medicine.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence for cardiac CT: Enhancing diagnosis and prognosis prediction

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) for cardiac computed tomography (CT) have shown great potential in enhancing diagnosis and prognosis prediction in patients with cardiovascular disease. Deep learning, a type of machine learning, has revolutionized radiology by enabling automatic feature extraction and learning from large datasets, particularly in image-based applications. Thus, AI-driven techniques have enabled a faster analysis of cardiac CT examinations than when they are analyzed by humans, while maintaining reproducibility. However, further research and validation are required to fully assess the diagnostic performance, radiation dose-reduction capabilities, and clinical correctness of these AI-driven techniques in cardiac CT. This review article presents recent advances of AI in the field of cardiac CT, including deep-learning-based image reconstruction, coronary artery motion correction, automatic calcium scoring, automatic epicardial fat measurement, coronary artery stenosis diagnosis, fractional flow reserve prediction, and prognosis prediction, analyzes current limitations of these techniques and discusses future challenges.

Refining the radiation and contrast medium dose in weight-grouped scanning protocols for coronary CT angiography

PURPOSE

To refine the currently used, weight-grouped protocol for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), in terms of the radiation and contrast medium dose, through clinical evaluation.

METHODS

Following the current routine setting that varies between three weight groups (group A: 55-65 kg, group B: 66-75 kg, group C: 76-85 kg), three additional reduction protocols were proposed to each group, with different combinations of lowered tube voltage (70-100 kVp), tube current (100-220 mAs), and iodine delivery rate (0.8-1.5 gI/s). A total of 321 patients scheduled for CCTA due to suspected coronary artery disease were enrolled, who were randomly assigned to one of the four subgroups of settings under the corresponding weight group. The resulting objective image quality was compared by measuring the contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio. Subjective image quality was graded by two radiologists using a 4-point Likert scale, on a total of 3848 segments. The optimal protocol for each weight group was determined with respect to the image quality and the applied radiation dose.

RESULTS

For all three groups, no significant difference was noticed in objective images quality between subgroups of dose settings (all p > 0.05). The average score on subjective image quality was ≥3 for every subgroup, while the percentage of score 4 showed greater dependence on the setting, ranging from 83.2% to 91.5%, and was chosen to be the determining factor. The optimal dose settings were found to be 80 kVp, 150 mAs, and 1.0 gI/s for patients of 55-75 kg in weight, and 100 kVp, 170 mAs, and 1.5 gI/s for those of 76-85 kg.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to refine the currently used, weight-grouped protocol for CCTA in terms of radiation and contrast medium dose, by use of an optimization strategy where the balance between dose and image quality can be improved in a routine clinical setting.