Efficacy of routine follow-up after first-line treatment for testicular cancer

[Follow-up of testicular germ cell tumors-historical aspects and current recommendations]

Systematic follow-up examinations of patients cured of testicular cancer first gained attention by caregivers in the 1980s only after the management of the disease had significantly been improved by the introduction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and almost synchronously, by the implementation of computerized tomography (CT) and serum tumor markers. Follow-up involves three aims: early diagnosis of recurrence, detection of treatment-related toxicity, and detection of secondary diseases. As the clinical presentation of testicular cancer is very heterogeneous, there is no uniform follow-up for the disease. Instead, risk-adapted follow-up schedules are required. Since the release of the German AWMF S3 guideline for the management of testicular cancer in 2019, high level evidence has accumulated for the noninferiority of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to CT with regard to abdominal imaging. Therefore, it is appropriate to modify the recommendations for follow-up given in the 2019 issue of the S3 guidelines. The modifications recommended herein relate to three issues: (1) Only three risk groups (instead of formerly four) are identified, i.e., seminoma (all stages); nonseminoma clinical stage 1b (i.e., pT2, with lymphovascular invasion) on surveillance; nonseminoma all other stages. All patients cured from poor risk disease or from relapses require individual follow-up schedules not included in the recommendations tabulated herein. (2) CT and abdominal sonography are replaced by MRI. (3) Chest X‑ray imaging during follow-up of seminoma patients is no longer recommended.

Posttreatment surveillance after paraaortic radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: a systematic analysis

CONTEXT

The extent and duration of routine follow-up after paraaortic (PA) radiotherapy for stage I seminoma remain controversial in terms of efficacy, costs of technical investigations and long-term morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the current literature assessing routine follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We identified all published reports on PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma (1986-2005). We analyzed time patterns of recurrence, sites and methods of detection of relapse, and follow-up programs used.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 11 publications reporting outcome in 2,280 patients. Median time to recurrence in 80 relapsing patients was 15.5 months. Less than 10% of recurrences were diagnosed beyond the third year of follow-up. Isolated locoregional or distant recurrence was observed in 52 and 20 patients, respectively, without significant difference in median time to relapse. 19 out of 43 recurrences with reported method of detection of relapse were diagnosed by routine technical investigations. There was no significant difference in time to relapse between those patients followed with low volume as compared to high-volume imaging protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that technical investigations in posttreatment surveillance should be restricted to the first 3 years of follow-up. Furthermore, surveillance programs with a high volume of imaging apparently do not lead to earlier detection or less advanced stage at the time of relapse as compared to protocols with low volume imaging.

What is the value of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma after paraaortic radiotherapy?: an analysis of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) in 675 prospectively followed patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Routine posttreatment surveillance is recommended after adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I seminoma. However, systematic studies on the value of follow-up in these patients are missing. This report addresses the efficiency of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma with particular reference to the mode of detection of relapse and the costs of posttreatment screening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All follow-up investigations of a prospectively followed cohort of 675 patients with stage I seminoma treated with PA radiotherapy were analyzed with respect to the first indications of relapse, patterns of recurrence, risk factors of relapse, and cost-efficiency of the different technical examinations of the follow-up schedule over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

With a median time to follow-up of 61 months, recurrence was diagnosed by symptoms or physical examination in 14 out of 26 relapsing patients. Among the technical follow-up investigations abdominopelvic imaging had the highest detection rate for relapse, while thoracic imaging and marker analysis were inefficient. Abdominal sonography had the highest cost-efficiency of all technical follow-up investigations, while computed tomography (CT) scans were responsible for approximately 60% of all costs. The authors failed to identify risk factors predictive of relapse after adjuvant irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Routine technical investigations during follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma yield only a low detection rate of relapse from cancer. The data presented here provide no evidence for the value of technical follow-up beyond the 3rd year after treatment or routine screening of the chest. Thorough physical examination of the patients should be encouraged. Patients should be informed about potential symptoms indicative of recurrence. Restrictive use of abdominopelvic CT scans will reduce exposure to ionizing radiation and considerably increase the cost-efficiency of follow-up.

Testicular cancer: marked birth cohort effects on incidence and a decline in mortality in southern Netherlands since 1970

The aim of our study was to interpret the changing incidence, and to describe the mortality of patients with testicular cancer in the south of the Netherlands between 1970 and 2004. On the basis of data from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry and Statistics Netherlands, 5-year moving average standardised incidence and mortality rates were calculated. An age-period-cohort (APC) Poisson regression analysis was performed to disentangle time and birth cohort effects on incidence. The incidence rate remained stable for all ages at about 3 per 100,000 person-years until 1989 but increased annually thereafter by 4% to 6 in 2004. This increase can almost completely be attributed to an increase in localised tumours. The largest increase was found for seminoma testicular cancer (TC) patients aged 35-39 and non-seminoma TC patients aged 20-24 years. Relatively more localised and tumours with lymph node metastases were detected in the later periods. APC analysis showed the best fit with an age-cohort model. An increase in incidence of TC was found for birth cohorts since 1950. The mortality rate dropped from 1.0 per 100,000 person-years in 1970 to 0.3 in 2005, with a steep annual decline of 12% in the period 1979-1986. In conclusion, the increase in incidence of TC was strongly correlated with birth cohorts since 1945. The increase in incidence is possibly caused by in utero or early life exposure to a yet unknown risk factor. There was a steep decline in mortality in the period 1979-1986.

The Role of Imaging in the Surveillance of Urologic Malignancies

Urologic malignancies are common, accounting for approximately 25% of all new cancer cases in the United States. Patients with urologic malignancies require long-term surveillance to detect progression or recurrence as early as possible. The urologist is faced with the task of balancing patient safety and cost-effectiveness, while finding the most practical follow-up regimen. For each urologic malignancy, this article reviews the commonly used radiologic techniques for surveillance and offers recommended follow-up schedules.