Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy

Development and validation of a novel comorbidity score specific for prostate cancer patients treated with robotic platform and its implication on DaVinci single-port system

To develop and validate a novel Comorbidity score for Robotic Surgery (CRS) in predicting severe complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Furthermore, we investigated the impact of the surgical platform (Multi-Port - MP vs Single-Port - SP) according to this score. We included 2085 ("development cohort") and 595 ("validation cohort") patients undergoing RARP at two tertiary referral centers between 2014 and March 2024 in a retrospective study. Statistical analyses included validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to predict 30-day severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a), development and external validation of CRS using calibration plots and decision curve analysis. Lastly, locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) analysis was used to graphically explore the impact of the robotic platform according to novel CRS. CCI exhibited limited predictive ability for severe complications (60% in the validation cohort). In multivariable logistic regression analyses testing the correlation between each condition included in CCI and severe complications, diabetes and myocardial infarction resulted as independent predictors (OR 1.75 [95%CI 1.05-2.82]; OR 1.92 [95%CI 1.26-2.88]) and were subsequently fitted into a multivariable logistic model including age, previous abdominal surgery and obesity (BMI > 30). The resulting predictive model demonstrated superior discrimination and clinical net benefit in predicting severe complications compared to CCI (AUC 64 vs 60%). At LOWESS analysis, SP platform was associated with lower risk of severe complications as CRS increased compared to MP system. The validated CRS showed better accuracy compared to CCI in predicting severe complications after RARP. Additionally, the use of SP robotic platform may reduce the risk of severe complications in highly comorbid patients according to CRS.

Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes in obese patients undergoing Da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The influence of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in obese (OB) and non-obese (NOB) prostate cancer patients remains a topic of debate. The objective of this study was to juxtapose the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of RARP in OB and NOB cohorts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched the databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database to identify relevant studies published in English up to September 2023. Review Manager was used to compare various parameters. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023473136). Sixteen comparative trials were included for 8434 obese patients compared with 55,266 non-obese patients.

RESULTS

The OB group had a longer operative time (WMD 17.8 min, 95% CI 9.7,25.8; p < 0.0001), a longer length of hospital stay (WMD 0.18 day, 95% CI 0.12,0.24; p < 0.00001, a higher estimated blood loss (WMD 50.6 ml, 95% CI 11.7,89.6; p = 0.01), and higher pelvic lymphadenectomy rate (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04,1.12; p < 0.0001)and lower nerve sparing rate (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91,0.99; p < 0.01), but there was no difference between unilateral (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8,1.3; p = 0.8)and bilateral (RR 0.9, 95% CI 0.9,1.0; p = 0.06)nerve sparing rate. Then, complication rates (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.5,1.7; p < 0.00001) were higher in the OB group, and both major (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1,1.8; p = 0.01)and minor (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1,1.7; p < 0.01)complication rates were higher in the OB group. Moreover, obese patients showed significantly higher probabilities of incontinence (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03,1.33; p = 0.01) and impotency (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01,1.15; p = 0.02) at 1 year. Last, the positive surgical margin (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1,1.3; p < 0.01) was higher in the OB group.

CONCLUSION

In the obese group, perioperative outcomes, total complications, functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes were all worse for RARP. Weight loss before RARP may be a feasible strategy to improve the prognosis of patients.

Latest Evidence on Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence

A radical prostatectomy is frequently used as the first-line treatment for men with prostate cancer. Persistent urinary incontinence after surgery is one of the most severe adverse events. We report the results of a comprehensive literature search focused on post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI), performed by a panel of experts on non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. The data on the prevalence and timing of PPI are very heterogeneous. The etiology of PPI can be multifactorial and mainly dependent on patient characteristics, lower urinary tract function or surgical issues. The medical history with a physical examination, the use of validated questionnaires with a voiding diary and pad tests are determinants in identifying the contributing factors and choosing the right treatment. Lifestyle intervention and urinary containment are the most frequently used strategies for the conservative management of PPI, while antimuscarinics, beta-3 agonists and duloxetine (off-label) are drugs indicated to manage PPI with a concomitant overactive bladder. Surgical therapies for the management of post-prostatectomy SUI include non-adjustable trans-obturator slings in men with mild-to-moderate incontinence and an artificial urinary sphincter in men with moderate-to-severe incontinence.

Impact of obesity on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical, oncological and functional outcomes between obese vs. normal-weight prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed 4555 consecutive RARP patients from a high-volume center 2008-2018. Analyses were restricted to normal-weight vs. obese patients (≥ 30 kg/m²). Multivariable cox regression analyses (MVA) assessed the effect of obesity on biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastatic progression (MP), erectile function and urinary continence recovery. Analyses were repeated after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Before matching, higher rates of pathological Gleason Grade group ≥ 4 (14 vs. 18%; p = 0.004) and pT3 stage (33 vs. 35%; p = 0.016) were observed in obese patients, with similar observations for surgery time, blood loss and 30-day wound- and surgical complication rates. For normal-weight vs. obese patients, BCR- and MP-free rates were 86 vs. 85% (p = 0.97) and 97.5 vs.97.8% (p = 0.8) at 48 months. Similarly, rates of erectile function at 36 months and urinary continence at 12 months were 56 vs. 49% (p = 0.012) and 88 vs. 85% (p = 0.003), respectively. Before and after propensity score matching, obesity had no effect on BCR or MP, but a negative effect on erectile function (matched HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.76-0.99; p = 0.029) and urinary continence recovery (matched HR 0.91, 95%CI 0.84-0.98; p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity did not represent a risk factor of BCR or MP after RARP despite higher rates of adverse pathological features. However, obesity was associated with higher risk of perioperative morbidity and impaired functional outcomes. Such information is integral for patient counselling. Thus, weight loss before RARP should be encouraged.

Obesity leads to a higher rate of positive surgical margins in the context of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multicenter study

Introduction

Current results concerning the effect of body mass index (BMI) on positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients with localized prostate cancer are inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further analyse the association between BMI and PSMs after RARP.

Material and methods

Between March 2017 and December 2017 a multicentre, prospective, randomised, single-blind series with a blinded outcome assessment of 232 RARP patients was performed. Multivariate logistical regression models were used to analyse the independent effect of obesity, with body-mass-index (BMI) dichotomised at 30 kg/m² (model-1) and at 90^th percentile (model-2), on PSMs.

Results

Median BMI was 27.2 kg/m², PSMs were found in 15.5% (n = 36). In multivariate model-1, obesity did not have a significant effect on PSMs (OR 2.34, p = 0.061). However, if BMI was dichotomized at the 90^th percentile (BMI ≥33.7 kg/m²), patients with a higher BMI showed PSMs four-times more frequently (OR 3.99, p = 0.013). In both models, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and pathological tumour stage had a significant effect on PSMs. There was no significant correlation between BMI and the extent of PSMs, nor a significant difference between the BMI groups and the localisation of PSMs. There was a higher percentage of posteriolateral PSM localisation in obese patients compared to patients with a BMI of less than 30 kg/m² (58.3% and 25.3% of the localisations were posterolateral in obese and non-obese patients, respectively), however this effect was not statistically significant (p = 0.175).

Conclusions

In addition to a longer operation time and about twice as many complications, patients with a BMI of ≥33.7 kg/m² had a higher PSM rate after RARP. Differences in localization of PSMs in relation to obesity should be evaluated in future research.

Morbid obesity is adversely associated with perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) may be more challenging in obese individuals. This study aimed to evaluate whether obesity had an adverse effect on perioperative outcomes following RALRP.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients who underwent RALRP from 2008-2014 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample database. We grouped RALRP patients into non-obese, obesity class I-II, and obesity class III (morbid obesity). Rates of blood transfusion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, and total costs were compared among the three groups by univariate regression, multivariate regression, and propensity score weighting analysis.

RESULTS

Of 53 301 patients identified, 48 725 were non-obese, 3572 were diagnosed with obesity class I-II, and 1004 were diagnosed with morbid obesity. Compared to non-obesity (7.62%), overall postoperative complications were commonly observed in obesity class I-II (10.55%) and morbid obesity (17.11%). Multivariable analyses suggested that morbid obesity was associated with increased overall postoperative (odds ratio [OR] 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-2.42), cardiac (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.03-2.58), respiratory (OR 4.03, 95% CI 3.04-5.36), genitourinary (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.08-2.90), miscellaneous medical (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.58-2.39) complications, prolonged hospitalization (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.57-2.21), and 12% higher total cost. Propensity score weighting analysis yielded similar results. Adequate covariate balance was achieved for all variables after weighting.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbid obesity is adversely associated with perioperative outcomes in RALRP. Close management is required in patients undergoing RALRP with morbid obesity for potential worse prognosis.

High surgeon volume and positive surgical margins can predict the risk of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Background:

The aim of this study was to determine whether any clinical factors are independent predictors of positive surgical margins (PSM), and to assess the association of PSM and biochemical recurrence (BR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Methods:

The population included cases with negative surgical margins (control group) and patients with PSM (study group). Tumor grade was evaluated according to the International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) system. A logistic regression model assessed the independent association of factors with the risk of PSM. The risk of BR was assessed by Cox’s multivariate proportional hazards.

Results:

A total of 732 consecutive patients were evaluated. Extend pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) was performed in 342 cases (46.7%). Overall, 192 cases (26.3%) had PSM. The risk of PSM was positively associated with the percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC; odds ratio, OR = 1.012; p = 0.004), extracapsular extension (pT3a; OR=2.702; p < 0.0001), invasion of seminal vesicle (pT3b; OR = 2.889; p < 0.0001), but inversely with body mass index (OR = 0.936; p = 0.021), and high surgeon volume (OR = 0.607; p = 0.006). Independent clinical factors associated with the risk of BR were baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA; hazard ratio, HR = 1.064; p = 0.004), BPC (HR = 1.015; p = 0.027), ISUP biopsy grade group (BGG) 2/3 (HR = 2.966; p = 0.003), and BGG 4/5 (HR = 3.122; p = 0.022). Pathologic factors associated with the risk of BR were ISUP group 4/5 (HR = 3.257; p = 0.001), pT3b (HR = 2.900; p = 0.003), and PSM (HR = 2.096; p = 0.045).

Conclusions:

In our cohort, features related to host, tumor, and surgeon volume are associated with the risk of PSM, which is also an independent parameter predicting BR after RARP. The surgical volume of the operating surgeon is an independent factor that decreases the risk of PSM, and, as such, the risk of BR.

Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases

Objectives: To evaluate clinicopathological and perioperative factors associated with the risk of focal and non-focal positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Patients and methods: The study was retrospective and excluded patients who were under androgen-deprivation therapy or had prior treatments. The population included: negative SM cases (control group), focal and non-focal PSM cases (study groups). PSMs were classified as focal when the linear extent of cancer invasion was ≤1 mm and non-focal when >1 mm. The independent association of factors with the risk of focal and non-focal PSMs was assessed by multinomial logistic regression.

Results: In all, 732 patients underwent RARP, from January 2013 to December 2017. An extended pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 342 cases (46.7%). In all, 192 cases (26.3%) had PSMs, which were focal in 133 (18.2%) and non-focal in 59 (8.1%). Independent factors associated with the risk of focal PSMs were body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 0.914; P = 0.006), percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC; OR 1.011; P = 0.015), pathological extracapsular extension (pathological tumour stage [pT]3a; OR 2.064; P = 0.016), and seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b; OR 2.150; P = 0.010). High surgeon volume was a protective factor in having focal PSM (OR 0.574; P = 0.006). Independent predictors of non-focal PSMs were BPC (OR 1,013; P = 0,044), pT3a (OR 4,832; P < 0.001), and pT3b (OR 5,153; P = 0.001).

Conclusions: In high-volume centres features related to host, tumour and surgeon volume are factors that predict the risk of focal and non-focal PSMs after RARP.

Abbreviations: AJCC: American joint committee on cancer; AS: active surveillance; ASA: American society of anesthesiologists; BCR: biochemical recurrence; BMI: body mass index; BPC: percentage of biopsy positive cores; ePLND: extended lymph node dissection; H&E: haematoxylin and eosin; IQR, interquartile range; ISUP: international society of urologic pathology; LNI: lymph node invasion; LOS: length of hospital stay; mpMRI: multiparametric MRI; (c)(p)N: (clinical) (pathological) nodal stage; OR: odds ratio; OT: operating time; PSA-DT: PSA-doubling time; (P)SM: (positive) surgical margin; (NS)(RA)RP: (nerve-sparing) (robot-assisted) radical prostatectomy; RT: radiation therapy; (c)(p)T: (clinical) (pathological) tumour stage

Does Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Have an Impact on Postoperative Early, Mid-Term and Late-Term Urinary Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on urinary continence after robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall, 99 patients with DM and 213 patients without DM who underwent RARP with at least 2-year follow-up were included. The preoperative prostate biopsy Gleason scores and clinical stages of the groups were similar. The patients who were dry or used one safety pad per day were regarded as continent. Early (0-3 months), mid-term (4-12 months), and late-term (>12 months) continence rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

In diabetic and nondiabetic groups, mean age was 63.3 ± 6.5 and 61.3 ± 6.8 years, respectively (p = 0.015). On the day of the removal of the urethral catheter, 61.6% (n = 61) of the diabetic patients and 99.1% (n = 211) of the nondiabetic patients were continent (p = 0.000). At third-month follow-up, 80.8% (n = 80) of the diabetic patients and 99.1% (n = 211) of the nondiabetic patients were continent (p = 0.000). At sixth-month follow-up, 89.9% (n = 89) of the diabetic patients and 99.1% (n = 211) of the nondiabetic patients were continent (p = 0.000). At first-year follow-up, 93.9% (n = 93) of the diabetic patients and 100% (n = 213) of the nondiabetic patients were continent (p = 0.001). At 18th-month follow-up, 96.0% (n = 95) of the diabetic patients and 100% (n = 213) of the nondiabetic patients were continent (p = 0.013). At second-year follow-up, 98.0% (n = 97) of the diabetic patients and 100% (n = 213) of the nondiabetic patients were continent (p = 0.115). Multivariate analysis showed that age and body mass index had no impact on urinary continence (p > 0.05). Presence of diabetes (p = 0.008) and duration (≥5 years) of diabetes (p = 0.004) were independent factors that had a significant negative impact on urinary continence.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes seems to be a significant disadvantage in gaining urinary continence compared with nondiabetic patients particularly in the first 18 months after RARP. Diabetic patients should be informed about possible late recovery of postoperative urinary continence compared with nondiabetic patients after RARP.

Short interval of biopsy to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not render any adverse effects on the perioperative outcomes

The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of prostate biopsy on perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).A total of 181 patients who underwent the RALP in our institution have been retrospectively reviewed, patients were divided into different groups according to the interval of biopsy to RALP and core numbers of biopsy. Perioperative outcomes including estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OT), surgical margin status, postoperative drainage, hospital stay, and perioperative complications were served as endpoints.Interval of biopsy to RALP was not significantly correlated with any perioperative outcomes, while the biopsy core numbers had significant correlation with the EBL. In logistic regression analysis, the biopsy core numbers were associated with higher risk of positive surgical margins. Body mass index (BMI) was also a significant factor related to OT.Delay of the RALP after biopsy was not applicable in the era of RALP and surgeons could be more freely in selecting the time of RALP. Besides, further studies should focus on how to improve the diagnostic efficiency of prostate cancer without increasing the incidence of surgical complications.

Impact of obesity on functional and oncological outcomes in radical perineal prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the impact of obesity on perioperative morbidity, functional, and oncological outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP).

METHODS

A total of 298 consecutive patients underwent RPP at our institution. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their body mass index (BMI): Normal weight <25 kg/m(2) (Group 1), overweight 25 to <30 kg/m(2) (Group 2), and obese ≥30 kg/m(2) (Group 3). We compared the groups with respect to perioperative data, postoperative oncologic, and functional outcomes. Evaluation of urinary continence and erectile function was performed using a patient-reported questionnaire and the International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire, respectively, administered preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Limitations included short follow-up time, retrospective design and lack of a morbidly obese group.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found among the 3 groups with regard to operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, catheter removal time, positive surgical margin, and complication rates. At 12 months, 94.7%, 95% and 95% of normal, overweight and obese patients, respectively, were continent (free of pad use) (p = 0.81). At 12 months, 30.6%, 29.8% and 30.4% of patients had spontaneous erections and were able to penetrate and complete intercourse in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively (p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients, no clinically relevant risks were associated with increasing BMI.

Outcomes of Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the Morbidly Obese: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

INTRODUCTION

An increasing number of obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m(2)]) with localized prostate cancer are presenting as candidates for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), which can be carried out using the transperitoneal or the extraperitoneal (EP) approach. Morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m(2)) patients present as an especially challenging surgical cohort. We sought to evaluate the perioperative and pathologic outcomes associated with EP-RARP in morbidly obese men.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved study, our prospectively collected database (Cancer Information Systems [CAISIS]) was reviewed. One thousand six hundred sixty-three patients underwent EP-RARP for localized prostate cancer at our institution between July 2003 and December 2013 by a single surgeon. Forty patients were considered morbidly obese. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed using multivariate analysis incorporating 10 covariates to identify the comparable group of patients with a BMI of >40 kg/m(2) and <40 kg/m(2).

RESULTS

Apart from BMI, the two groups were matched (all p-values >0.05). Despite a higher total operating time and estimated blood loss (EBL) in the morbidly obese (238 vs 176 minutes, p<0.0001, and 235 vs 192 mL, p=0.003, respectively), there were no differences in the ability to perform nerve-sparing or pelvic lymphadenectomy, or the length of stay. While the morbidly obese had a higher rate of harboring more aggressive disease on final pathology (pT3 rates, 27.5 vs 7.5%, respectively), there were no differences in other postoperative pathologic parameters, such as prostate specimen weight, positive surgical margin status, and Gleason score sum. Moreover, there were no differences in intra- or postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The morbidly obese cohort harbored more aggressive disease with the difference in the proportion of pathologic T3 disease statistically significant. Apart from increased total operating time and EBL in the morbid obese, EP-RARP leads to comparable perioperative and pathologic outcomes to the nonmorbidly obese. Consideration should be given to added operating room time when operating on the morbidly obese.

Handling difficult anastomosis. Tips and tricks in obese patients and narrow pelvis

Vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) is a technically challenging step in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in obese individuals. We describe technical modifications to facilitate VUA encountered in obese individuals and in patients with a narrow pelvis. A Pubmed literature search was performed between 2000 and 2012 to review all articles related to RALP, obesity and VUA for evaluation of technique, complications and outcomes of VUA in obese individuals. In addition to the technical modifications described in the literature, we describe our own experience to encounter the technical challenges induced by obesity and narrow pelvis. In obese patients, technical modifications like use of air seal trocar technology, steep Trendlenburg positioning, bariatric trocars, alterations in trocar placement, barbed suture and use of modified posterior reconstruction facilitate VUA in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. The dexterity of the robot and the technical modifications help to perform the VUA in challenging patients with lesser difficulty. The experience of the surgeon is a critical factor in outcomes in these technically challenging patients, and obese individuals are best avoided during the initial phase of the learning curve.

Does elevated body mass index (BMI) affect the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

With the prevalence of obesity in the United States, a significant proportion of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) candidates have an elevated body mass index (BMI). We determine if this impacts on the clinical outcomes of RALP.

METHODS

218 consecutive patients underwent RALP were identified from a prospectively maintained RALP database recorded and compared for their demographics, clinical outcomes and adverse events in normal weight (BMI <25 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI ≥25 and <30 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) groups.

RESULTS

36 normal weight, 115 overweight and 67 obese patients were identified. There were no significant differences in demographic data among the three groups except for mean BMI (23.1 vs. 27.5 vs. 32.8 kg/m(2), p < 0.001). The median operative time was longer in obese patients compared to both overweight (210 vs. 189 min, p = 0.031) and normal weight (210 vs. 177 min, p = 0.008) patients. There were no significant differences in median estimated blood loss, mean prostate volume, positive surgical margin rate and time to continence without pads. The median urethral catheter duration and hospitalization were similar in all groups. Patients with elevated BMI had a significantly higher median Gleason score (p = 0.046) and incidence of pathologic T3 disease (p = 0.038). The incidence of adverse events was low and there were no significant differences among the three groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated BMI appears to increase the RALP operative time, but has little impact on other intraoperative parameters, clinical outcomes or patient morbidity. RALP is a safe and effective procedure in patients with elevated BMI.

Influence of Morbid Obesity on Surgical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery

Objective: The aim of this research was to estimate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected cohort data for a consecutive series of patients undergoing gynecologic robotic surgery in a single institution. BMI, expressed as kg/m2, was abstracted from the medical charts of all patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy. Data on estimated blood loss (EBL), hemoglobin (Hb) drop, procedure time, length of hospital stay, uterine weight, pain-medication use, and complications were also extracted. Results: Two hundred and eighty-one patients underwent robotic operations. Types of procedures were total hysterectomy with or without adnexal excision, and total hysterectomies with lymphadenectomies. Eighty-four patients who were classified as morbidly obese (BMI>35) were compared with 197 patients who had a BMI of<35 (nonmorbidly obese). For patients with BMI<35, and BMI>35, the mean BMI was 27.1 and 42.5 kg/m2 (p<0.05), mean age was 49 and 50 (p=0.45), mean total operative time was 222 and 266 minutes (p<0.05), console time 115 and 142 minutes (p<0.05), closing time (from undocking until port-site fascia closure) was 30 and 41 minutes (p<0.05), EBL was 67 and 79 mL (p=0.27), Hb drop was 1.6 and 1.4 (p=0.28), uterine weight was 196.2 and 227 g (p=0.52), pain-medication use 93.7 and 111 mg of morphine (p=0.46), and mean length of stay was 1.42 and 1.43 days (0.9), all respectively. No statistically significant difference was noted between the 2 groups for EBL, Hb drop, LOS, uterine weight, pain-medication use, or complications. The only statistically significant difference was seen in operating times and included docking, console, closing, and procedure times. There were no perioperative mortalities. Morbidity occurred in 24 patients (8%). In the morbidly obese group, there were 6 complications (7%) and, in the nonmorbidly obese group, there were 18 complications (9%). Conclusions: Morbid obesity does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of morbidity in patients undergoing robotically assisted gynecologic surgery. Morbid obesity is associated with increased procedure time, but otherwise appears to have no difference in outcomes. Robotic surgery offered an ideal approach, allowing minimally invasive surgery in these technically challenging patients, with no significant increase in morbidity. J GYNECOL SURG 30:81).

Influence of obesity on localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy

This study aimed to investigate the association between different anthropometric measures of obesity and clinicopathological characteristics in Chinese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). A total of 734 patients with clinically localized PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) were included in this study. Clinical and pathological data from each patient were collected. Anthropometric measures of abdominal adiposity were measured from T2-weighted sagittal localisation images from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for 413 (56.3%) patients. Patient clinical and pathological characteristics were compared across body mass index (BMI) groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to address the influence of the preoperative total testosterone level and anthropometric measures of obesity on pathological outcomes. In the multivariate analysis, BMI was not significantly associated with any pathological outcomes. However, the percentage of visceral adipose tissue (VAT%) was an independent predictor of a pathological Gleason score ≥8 (P<0.001), extracapsular extension (ECE; P=0.002) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI; P=0.007). More importantly, we found that the preoperative total testosterone level was significantly correlated with the VAT% (Pearson's correlation coefficient: -0.485, P<0.001) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT; Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.413, P<0.001). In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that abdominal fat distribution, and particularly VAT%, is associated with a risk of advanced PCa. Moreover, our present study confirms a significant inverse correlation between visceral adiposity and testosterone. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the biological mechanisms underlying the relationship between abdominal adiposity and the aggressiveness of PCa.

Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy outcomes in obese and extremely obese men

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the operative and pathologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with progressive changes in body mass index (BMI) category.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-surgeon series of 1023 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (mostly extraperitoneal) patients was considered. Of these patients, 987 were evaluable. Results were stratified by the World Health Organization BMI category. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analysis was used to model the operating time, length of stay, positive surgical margins, and noncurable cancer.

RESULTS

Of the 987 patients, 563 (57%) were overweight and 193 (19.6%) were obese. Of the 193 obese patients, 152 (15.4%) had a BMI of 30 to <35 kg/m(2) (class I obesity), 28 (2.8%) a BMI of 35 to <40 kg/m(2) (class II), and 13 (1.3%) a BMI of ≥40 kg/m(2) (class III). No differences were found in the estimated blood loss, complications, PSM, pathologic stage, or biochemical recurrence across the BMI categories (6-month median follow-up). However, pelvic lymph node dissection was more commonly omitted and the nerve-sparing score was inferior in the obese men. On multivariate analysis, a higher BMI was a significant predictor of a longer operating time.

CONCLUSION

Obese men can safely undergo laparoscopic radical prostatectomy or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, although the ability to perform excellent nerve sparing appears to decrease with increasing obesity. Nevertheless, obese men can expect perioperative and early oncologic outcomes comparable to those of normal weight men without an increased risk of perioperative complications.

Preserving continence during robotic prostatectomy

Preservation of postoperative urinary continence remains the primary concern of all men and their surgeons following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Without doubt, continence is the most important quality of life issue following radical prostatectomy. Identification of difficulties and lessons learned over time has helped focus efforts in order to improve urinary quality of life and continence. This review will examine definitions of continence and urinary quality of life evaluation, technical aspects and the impact of patient-related factors affecting time to and overall continence.

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: surgical evolution or new paradigm

Early studies indicate that robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has promising short-term outcomes; however, RARP is beyond its infancy, and the long-term report cards are now beginning. The important paradigm shift introduced by RARP is the reevaluation of the entire open radical prostatectomy experience in surgical technique by minimizing blood loss and complications, maximizing cancer free outcomes, and a renewed assault in preserving quality of life outcomes by many novel mechanisms. RARP provides a new technical “canvas” for surgical masters to create upon, and in ten years, has reinvigorated a 100-year-old “gold standard” surgery.

Advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients: comparison with the open procedure

Purpose

Obesity has been suggested as a risk factor for worse perioperative outcomes, especially in radical prostatectomy, in several studies. However, the impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes has not yet been well elucidated for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). We evaluated whether obesity had an adverse effect on outcomes following RALP compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP).

Materials and Methods

From April 2008 to May 2011, 181 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RALP, 111; RRP, 70). These patients were subdivided into two groups according to body mass index (BMI): the nonobese group (BMI, 25 kg/m² or less) and the obese group (BMI, greater than 25 kg/m²). Perioperative outcomes in RALP and RRP were retrospectively compared between the two groups.

Results

In RRP, patients in the obese group (n=20) showed greater blood loss and a higher complication rate than did those in the nonobese group (n=50). However, in RALP, no statistically significant differences in perioperative outcomes were observed between the obese (n=37) and the nonobese (n=74) groups. RALP showed less blood loss and a lower complication rate in both the obese and nonobese groups than did RRP.

Conclusions

RALP is thought to be a more effective and safer procedure in obese patients compared with traditional open radical prostatectomy. In the management of obese patients with localized prostate cancer, RALP should be considered as a primary choice for treatment.

Laparoscopic urorectal fistula repair: value of the salvage prostatectomy and review of current approaches

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The surgical approach and repair for urorectal fistula (URF) is a challenging task. A variety of techniques have been described to treat URFs, and the laparoscopic approach has been approved as an efficient tool for even some complex fistulas. We aimed to report our laparoscopic experience for complex URF repair with special emphasis on salvage prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included four men (59-75 years), with laparoscopic repair for complex URFs. URF developed after transurethral resection of the prostate in patients 2 and 3 and after radical prostatectomy in patient 4. Patient 1 had received combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy for the rectal carcinoma; a prostatic abscess developed that resulted at the end in URF. Laparoscopic salvage prostatectomy was performed for patients 1 and 2. A transvesical laparoscopic approach was performed for patient 3, and a transperitoneal transvesical technique was performed for patient 4. A tunica vaginalis flap was used for patient 1, and peritoneal interposition flaps were developed in patients 2 and 4 mL, and no patients needed intraoperative blood transfusion. Postoperative hospital stay was 12 to 34 days. The urethral catheter was removed on postoperative day 11 to 32, and cystography showed no leakage of contrast except in patient 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic URF repair is safe and efficacious in experienced hands even in complex cases, and salvage laparoscopic prostatectomy seems like a valuable operative option. The technique requires advanced experience, however, particularly with pelvic surgery and intracorporeal suturing.

Robotic radical prostatectomy at a teaching community hospital: outcomes and safety

Robotic prostatectomy was found to be a safe and successful option for prostate cancer treatment in a community teaching hospital.

Objectives:

This study describes the early experience of robotic prostatectomy exclusively at a teaching community hospital.

Methods:

This is a retrospective report of 153 consecutive patients on whom 4 physicians were the operating surgeon.

Results:

The average hospital stay was 1.5 days, the mean operative time was 175 minutes, and the estimated operative blood loss was <300mL. The perioperative complication rate was 7.8% (12/153). The prostate-specific antigen failure rate was 2% (2/114). Urinary continence was maintained in 98% of patients 9 months after surgery. Postoperative Gleason scores differed significantly from preoperative biopsy results (P<0.001). Pathological records reported positive margins in 35% (54/153) of specimens. T3 tumors had positive margins more than twice as often as T2 tumors (P<0.002). Surgeon experience correlated with shorter operative times (P<0.001), but not with positive margins. Increasing body mass index was associated with increased operating time (P=0.001).

Conclusions:

Robotic prostatectomy appears to be a safe and successful option for prostate cancer treatment in a teaching community hospital.

Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes during the learning curve for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) have suggested that obesity is a risk factor for worse perioperative outcomes. We evaluated whether body mass index (BMI) adversely affected perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective database of 153 RARP (single surgeon) was analyzed. Obesity was defined as BMI >/= 30 kg/m(2); normal BMI < 25 kg/m(2); and overweight as 25 to 30 kg/m(2). Two separate analyses were performed: the first 50 cases (the initial learning curve) and the entire cohort of 153 RARP.

RESULTS

In the initial cohort of 50 cases (14 obese patients), there was no statistically significant difference with regards to operative times, port-placement times and estimated blood loss (EBL). Length of stay (LOS) was longer in the obese group (4.3 vs. 2.9 days); BMI remained an independent predictor of increased LOS on multivariate linear regression analysis (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative outcomes of leak rates, margin rates and incisional herniae. In the entire cohort, when comparing obese patients to those with a normal BMI, there was no statistically significant difference in operative times, EBL, LOS, or immediate postoperative outcomes. However, on multivariate linear regression analysis, BMI was an independent predictor of increased operative time (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Obese patients do not have an increased risk of blood loss, positive margins or the postoperative complications of incisional hernia and leak during the learning curve. They do, however, have slightly longer operative times; we also noted an increased LOS in our first 50 cases.

Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study

PURPOSE

Positive surgical margins are an independent predictive factor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We analyzed the incidence of and associative factors for positive surgical margins in a multi-institutional series of 8,418 robotic assisted radical prostatectomies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the records of 8,418 patients who underwent robotic assisted radical prostatectomy at 7 institutions. Of the patients 323 had missing data on margin status. Positive surgical margins were categorized into 4 groups, including apex, bladder neck, posterolateral and multifocal. The records of 6,169 patients were available for multivariate analysis. The variables entered into the logistic regression models were age, body mass index, preoperative prostate specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, prostate weight and pathological stage. A second model was built to identify predictive factors for positive surgical margins in the subset of patients with organ confined disease (pT2).

RESULTS

The overall positive surgical margin rate was 15.7% (1,272 of 8,095 patients). The positive surgical margin rate for pT2 and pT3 disease was 9.45% and 37.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis pathological stage (pT2 vs pT3 OR 4.588, p<0.001) and preoperative prostate specific antigen (4 or less vs greater than 10 ng/ml OR 2.918, p<0.001) were the most important independent predictive factors for positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Increasing prostate weight was associated with a lower risk of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (OR 0.984, p<0.001) and a higher body mass index was associated with a higher risk of positive surgical margins (OR 1.032, p<0.001). For organ confined disease preoperative prostate specific antigen was the most important factor that independently correlated with positive surgical margins (4 or less vs greater than 10 ng/ml OR 3.8, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prostatic apex followed by a posterolateral site was the most common location of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Factors that correlated with cancer aggressiveness, such as pathological stage and preoperative prostate specific antigen, were the most important factors independently associated with an increased risk of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

Does body mass index have an impact on the rate and location of positive surgical margins following robot assisted radical prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVE

Obesity has been shown to be associated with more aggressive prostate cancer. We sought to determine whether body mass index (BMI) has an impact on the rate and location of positive surgical margins (PSM) in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP).

METHODS

Records of patients undergoing RLRP between the years 2003 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. We collected data regarding clinicopathologic data (i.e., age, BMI, PSA levels, Gleason score, pathologic stage, surgical margins status, and location). BMI was categorized as <25, 25-30, and >30 Kg/m(2). The rates of overall apical, peripheral, and prostate base (PB) PSM were compared across BMI groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 577 records were analyzed. Median age, PSA levels, and BMI were 60.1, 5.3, and 28.2, respectively. Percentage of Gleason score 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 in the entire series was 0.2, 2.1, 40.7, 53, 2.3, and 1.7, respectively. Four hundred eighty-four (81.8%) cases were pathologically organ-confined. The overall incidence of PSM was 23.1% (n = 133) of those 10.2% apical, 3.6% PB and 14.2% peripheral. There were no statistically significant differences found in the rate of PSM by location between BMI groups; however, in the obese group there was a tendency toward slightly higher involvement of the PB with tumor in all stages and greater involvement of all anatomic areas in the T3 pathologic stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Although obesity has been associated with more aggressive prostate cancer, BMI does not appear to have statistically significant influence on the rate and location of PSM in RLRP. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings.

Factors affecting the outcome of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: pelvic arch interference and depth of the pelvic cavity

Purpose

To determine the effect of pelvic arch interference and the depth of the pelvic cavity, as shown on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), on the performance of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (ELRP).

Materials and Methods

In 115 patients, pelvic bone images were obtained at the time of prostate MRI before ELRP. In the reconstructed sagittal plane, we measured the true conjugate diameter, the obstetric conjugate diameter, the difference between the true and obstetric diameters, and the distance between the true conjugate and the prostate apex (pelvic depth). We analyzed which factors were associated with operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and positive surgical margins (PSMs).

Results

The difference between the true and obstetric conjugate diameters was 12.7±3.7 mm, and the pelvic depth was 59.9±6.0 mm. The OT, EBL, and the rate of PSMs were 260.1±91.1 minutes, 633.3±524.7 ml, and 19% (22/115), respectively. According to multiple linear regression analysis, predictors of a higher EBL included pelvic depth (3.0% higher per 1 mm increase in diameter difference, p=0.01) and prostate volume (1.5% higher per 1 cc increase in prostate volume, p=0.002). Factors associated with a longer OT were pelvic depth (p=0.04), serum prostate-specific antigen (p=0.04), prostate volume (p=0.02), and Gleason score (p=0.001). For PSMs, only pT2 was an independent factor.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the depth of the pelvic cavity and prostate volume may increase surgical difficulty in patients undergoing ELRP.

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2010

This article reviews the current status of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with outcome analysis. The published English literature (PubMed) database was searched extensively for major publications and large series on RARP. The search was carried out over the preceding 3-year period. Selected series were then reviewed, summarized and analyzed for their salient features. A literature search yielded 19 major publications on RARP in the preceding 2 years. A review of the current RARP literature (2006-2009) of multi-institutional cases of RARP demonstrated a mean operating room time, blood loss, hospital stay, positive surgical margin rate and perioperative-complication rate of approximately 194 min, 196 ml, 1.43 days, 25.7% and 5.83 %, respectively (based on the analysis of data using central tendency measures [mean]). The overall potency and continence rates were 73.6 and 87.1%, respectively (based on analysis of the published and reported data). All RARP cases were performed with the use of da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, CA, USA). It is expected that in 2010 close to 70% of radical prostatectomies in the USA will be performed with robotic assistance. The patient and surgeon appeal for RARP continues to expand exponentially. It seems pertinent to conclude that increasing experience with RARP may reduce the incidence of positive surgical margins and will improve the functional outcome, which is the challenge at this point in time. Although the early cancer control and intermediate follow-up on functional outcome with RARP appears to be convincing and favorable, the long-term ( approximately 10 years) data are still awaited.

Bilateral Pulmonary Emboli After Bilateral Mastectomy in a 15-Year-Old Boy with Hypogonadism: A Case Report

Pulmonary emboli are rare, yet serious, complications of body contouring surgery. When they occur, they more often follow as complications of long, invasive procedures in adults. The present report details a case of bilateral pulmonary emboli in an obese 15-year-old boy with hypogonadism undergoing bilateral mastectomy for gynecomastia. The diagnosis of bilateral pulmonary emboli was made on the basis of clinical presentation and positive ventilation/perfusion scan. The patient responded well to heparin anticoagulation treatment. The relevance of pediatric obesity, pediatric body contouring surgery and the risk of thromboembolic events in pediatric patients are discussed.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the morbidly obese patient

Introduction. Obesity and prostate cancer are among the more common health issues affecting men in the United States. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2)) patients undergoing RALP between 2004-2009 at our institution. Parameters including operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, pathology, and complication rate were examined. Results. A total of 15 patients were included, with a mean BMI of 43 kg/m(2). Mean preoperative PSA was 5.78 ng/dL, and Gleason score was 6.6. Mean operative time was 163 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 210 mL. The mean hospital stay was 1.3 days. Positive margins were noted in 2 (13%) patients, each with pT3 disease. There were no blood transfusions, open conversions, or Clavien Grade II or higher complications. Conclusions. In our experience, RALP is feasible in morbidly obese patients. We noted several challenges in this patient population which were overcome with modification of technique and experience.

Does performance of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy within 2 weeks of prostate biopsy affect the outcome?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) performed within either 2 or 4 weeks of prostate biopsy is associated with surgical difficulty or immediate postoperative outcome.

METHODS

Of the 121 patients that underwent RALP at our institution, 104 patients were prospectively included. Patients were sequentially divided into three groups: first patient in group A (interval from biopsy to RALP: 2 weeks), second patient in group B (2-4 weeks), third patient in group C (more than 4 weeks), fourth patient in group A, and so on. The clinical, operative, pathological, and postoperative functional data were collected.

RESULTS

Group A consisted of 31 patients, group B of 33, and group C of 40 patients. Median patient age and median follow up were 61.1 years and 14.1 months, respectively. In group A, mean estimated blood loss was significantly higher than the other two groups, even though there was no significant difference in the mean console time. Postoperative complications did not make any difference among the groups. In the multivariable analysis, the interval from biopsy to surgery did not affect operative times or surgical margins, or the immediate postoperative outcomes (e.g. recovery of erectile function, continence, and biochemical recurrence).

CONCLUSION

A short interval for less than two weeks between the prostate biopsy and the RALP seems to be feasible and safe. Further studies with larger samples are needed to corroborate these findings.

Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Positive surgical margin (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP) has been shown to be an independent predictive factor for cancer recurrence. Several investigations have correlated clinical and histopathologic findings with surgical margin status after open RP. However, few studies have addressed the predictive factors for PSM after robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RARP).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify predictive factors for PSMs and their locations after RARP.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We prospectively analyzed 876 consecutive patients who underwent RARP from January 2008 to May 2009.

INTERVENTION

All patients underwent RARP performed by a single surgeon with previous experience of >1500 cases.

MEASUREMENTS

Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify potential predictive factors for PSM. Three logistic regression models were built: (1) one using preoperative variables only, (2) another using all variables (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) combined, and (3) one created to identify potential predictive factors for PSM location. Preoperative variables entered into the models included age, body mass index (BMI), prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, number of positive cores, percentage of positive cores, and American Urological Association symptom score. Intra- and postoperative variables analyzed were type of nerve sparing, presence of median lobe, percentage of tumor in the surgical specimen, gland size, histopathologic findings, pathologic stage, and pathologic Gleason grade.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In the multivariable analysis including preoperative variables, clinical stage was the only independent predictive factor for PSM, with a higher PSM rate for T3 versus T1c (odds ratio [OR]: 10.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-43.8) and for T2 versus T1c (OR: 2.9; 95% CI, 1.9-4.6). Considering pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables combined, percentage of tumor, pathologic stage, and pathologic Gleason score were associated with increased risk of PSM in the univariable analysis (p<0.001 for all variables). However, in the multivariable analysis, pathologic stage (pT2 vs pT1; OR: 2.9; 95% CI, 1.9-4.6) and percentage of tumor in the surgical specimen (OR: 8.7; 95% CI, 2.2-34.5; p=0.0022) were the only independent predictive factors for PSM. Finally, BMI was shown to be an independent predictive factor (OR: 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3; p=0.0119) for apical PSMs, with increasing BMI predicting higher incidence of apex location. Because most of our patients were referred from other centers, the biopsy technique and the number of cores were not standardized in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical stage was the only preoperative variable independently associated with PSM after RARP. Pathologic stage and percentage of tumor in the surgical specimen were identified as independent predictive factors for PSMs when analyzing pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables combined. BMI was shown to be an independent predictive factor for apical PSMs.

Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications

CONTEXT

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) using the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is now in widespread use for the management of localised prostate cancer (PCa). Many reports of the safety and efficacy of this procedure have been published. However, there are few specific reports of the limitations and complications of RALP.

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose of this review is to ascertain the downsides of RALP by focusing on complications and limitations of this approach.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A Medline search of the English-language literature was performed to identify all papers published since 2001 relating to RALP. Papers providing data on technical failures, complications, learning curve, or other downsides of RALP were considered. Of 412 papers identified, 68 were selected for review based on their relevance to the objective of this paper.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

RALP has the following principal downsides: (1) device failure occurs in 0.2-0.4% of cases; (2) assessment of functional outcome is unsatisfactory because of nonstandardised assessment techniques; (3) overall complication rates of RALP are low, although higher rates are noted when complications are reported using a standardised system; (4) long-term oncologic data and data on high-risk PCa are limited; (5) a steep learning curve exists, and although acceptable operative times can be achieved in <20 cases, positive surgical margin (PSM) rates may require experience with >80 cases before a plateau is achieved; (6) robotic assistance does not reduce the difficulty associated with obese patients and those with large prostates, middle lobes, or previous surgery, in whom outcomes are less satisfactory than in patients without such factors; (7) economic barriers prevent uniform dissemination of robotic technology.

CONCLUSIONS

Many of the downsides of RALP identified in this paper can be addressed with longer-term data and more widespread adoption of standardised reporting measures. The significant learning curve should not be understated, and the expense of this technology continues to restrict access for many patients.

Impact of obesity on outcomes after open surgical and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

This study examined impact of obesity on outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were obtained from the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Body mass index (BMI) was categorized according to National Institutes of Health guidelines. Multivariate regression adjusted for 40 other risk factors to analyze trends in complications and death within 30 days.

RESULTS

We identified 2,201 patients undergoing 1,185 open and 1,016 endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms from January 2004 through December 2005. BMI distribution was identical in both groups and reflected national population statistics: approximately 30% were normal (BMI 18.5 to 24.9), 40% were overweight (25.0 to 29.9), and 30% were obese class I (30.0 to 34.9), II (35.0 to 39.9), or III (>/=40.0). After open repair, obesity of any class was independently predictive of wound complications (adjusted odds ratio = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.3; p = 0.002). Class III obesity was also an independent predictor or renal complications (adjusted odds rato = 6.3; 95% CI, 2.2 to 18.0; p < 0.0001) and cardiac complications (adjusted odds ratio = 4.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 22.9; p = 0.045. After EVAR, obesity (any class) was predictive of wound complications (adjusted odds ratio = 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 8.1; p = 0.026), but not predictive of other complications or death. Between the two types of operation, there were fewer complications and deaths after EVAR compared with open repair across all BMI categories, but outcomes were most disparate among the obese.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is an independent risk factor that surgeons should consider during patient selection and operative planning for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Obese patients appear to particularly benefit from successful EVAR over open repair, but if open repair is required, special attention should be paid to cardiac risk, perioperative renal protection, and aggresive wound infection prevention measures.

Is robot assistance affecting operating room time compared with pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?

PURPOSE

To compare operating room times between retroperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) and pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 2007 to April 2008, 288 patients underwent an extraperitoneal LRP in our institution. Eighty-three LRPs were performed with robot assistance using the da Vinci Surgical System (RALRP) whereas 205 pure LRPs were performed. Operating room times were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Both groups were statistically equal concerning age (P = 0.95), body mass index (P = 0.52), prostate-specific antigen level (P = 0.40), prostate volume (P = 0.49), clinical stage (P = 0.11), and Gleason score on biopsy (P = 0.57). Total operating room time was not significantly different between the two groups (223.6 vs 215.7 minutes in LRP and RALRP groups, respectively; P = 0.23). Mean patient installation was longer in the RALRP group (33.2 vs 24.0 minutes, P < 0.01). Mean operative time was significantly shorter by about 20 minutes in the RALRP group (145.6 vs 164.7 minutes, P < 0.01). Mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the RALRP group (469 mL vs 889 mL in the LRP group, P < 0.01). No statistical differences were observed regarding hospital stay, bladder catheterization, and complication rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Occupation times of the operating room are equivalent during pure retroperitoneal LRP and RALRP. For a trained team performing four procedures per week, the use of the robot for LRP with no lymph node dissection decreases actual operative time at the expense of an increase in installation time, compared with pure laparoscopy.