1
|
Del Giudice F, Nowak Ł, Glover F, Ha A, Scott M, Belladelli F, Basran S, Li S, Mulloy E, Pradere B, Asero V, Łaszkiewicz J, Krajewski W, Nair R, Eisenberg ML. 5α-reductase inhibitors with or without alpha-blockers and risk of incident upper tract urothelial carcinoma in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: Analysis of US insurance claims data. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00571-4. [PMID: 39244390 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing data suggests that androgen receptor signaling may play an important role in the carcinogenesis of urothelial cancers. While the chemoprotective effect of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARi) on bladder cancer risk in men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) has been explored with conflicting results, the evidence regarding 5-ARi treatment, and the risk of incident Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) development is lacking. Therefore, our objective was to investigate the impact of the 5-ARi administration on the incidence of new UTUC cases using a large US database. METHODS The MerativeTM Marketscan® database was used to identify men ≥ 50 years old with a diagnosis of BPH and an active 5-ARi prescription between 2007 and 2021 and were subsequently matched with paired controls. A multivariable Cox regression model was implemented to ascertain the association of 5-ARi and/or alpha-blocker (α-B) medications on the incidence of UTUC. Additional subgroup analyses were conducted based on exposure risk (with a 2-year threshold) to investigate the relationship between 5-ARi and UTUC over time. RESULTS Overall, n=1,103,743 men BPH without prescriptions for BPH, n=31,142 men on 5-ARi, and n=160,049 using 5-ARi + α-B were identified. Over the follow-up period, a total of n=4,761 patients were diagnosed with UTUC. After matching, UTUC incidence ranged from 0.36% to 0.41% in men without active BPH therapy vs. 0.30% and 0.52% for the 5-ARi and 5-ARi + α-B groups, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the chemoprotective effect on UTUC risk was not observed for either 5-ARi monotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.58-1.44) or 5-ARi + α-B combination (aHR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87-1.19). This remained true for both short-term (≤ 2 years) and long-term (> 2 years) follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS The use of 5-ARi for BPH, whether used alone or in combination with α-B, is not associated with incident UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy. Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy; Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Łukasz Nowak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50 367 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Frank Glover
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA,USA
| | - Albert Ha
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael Scott
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Federico Belladelli
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; University Vita-Salute San Rafaele, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Satvir Basran
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Shufeng Li
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Evan Mulloy
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Vincenzo Asero
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy. Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Jan Łaszkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50 367 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50 367 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Rajesh Nair
- Department of Urology, Guys and St, Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael L Eisenberg
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Del Giudice F, Belladelli F, Glover F, Basran S, Li S, Mulloy E, Pradere B, Soria F, Krajewski W, Nair R, Muncey W, Seranio N, Eisenberg ML. 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARi) with or without alpha-blockers (α-B) for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia do NOT lower the risk of incident Bladder Cancer: United States insurance claims data. World J Urol 2023; 41:2783-2791. [PMID: 37548746 PMCID: PMC10582125 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04551-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemoprotective effect of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARi) on bladder cancer (BCa) risk in men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) has been explored with conflicting results. We sought to examine the effect of 5-ARi on new BCa diagnoses in a large US database. METHODS Men ≥ 50 y/o with a prescription for 5-ARi after BPH diagnosis were identified in the IBM® Marketscan® Research de-identified Databases between 2007 and 2016 and matched with paired controls. Incident BCa diagnoses were identified after BPH diagnosis and/or pharmacologic treatment. Multivariable regression modeling adjusting for relevant factors was implemented. Sub-group analyses by exposure risk were performed to explore the association between 5-ARi and BCa over time. Administration of alpha-blockers (α-B) w/o 5-ARi was also examined. RESULTS In total, n = 24,036 men on 5-ARi, n = 107,086 on 5-ARi plus alpha-blockers, and n = 894,275 without medical therapy for BPH were identified. The percentage of men diagnosed with BCa was 0.8% for the 5-ARi, 1.4% for the 5-ARi + α-B, and 0.6% for the untreated BPH group of incident BCa (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 - 1.47), and 1.08, 95%CI 0.89 - 1.30, respectively). This was also true at both shorter (≤ 2 yr) and longer-term (> 2 yr) follow up. In addition, α-B alone had no change in BCa risk (HR 1.06, 0.86-1.30). CONCLUSIONS We did not find any diminished risk of new BCa in men treated with 5-ARi (i.e., chemoprotective effect). The current report suggests that 5-ARi do not change a man's bladder cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Federico Belladelli
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Frank Glover
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Satvir Basran
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Shufeng Li
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Evan Mulloy
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1030, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, 31130, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Francesco Soria
- Urology Division, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, 10124, Turin, Italy
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-367, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Rajesh Nair
- Department of Urology, Guys and St, Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Wade Muncey
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nicolas Seranio
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael L Eisenberg
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mori K, Resch I, Miura N, Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Katayama S, D'Andrea D, Kardoust Parizi M, Abufaraj M, Fukuokaya W, Collà Ruvolo C, Luzzago S, Knipper S, Palumbo C, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Enikeev DV, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Prognostic role of the systemic immune-inflammation index in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy: results from a large multicenter international collaboration. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021; 70:2641-2650. [PMID: 33591412 PMCID: PMC8360829 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-02884-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the prognostic role of the preoperative systemic immune–inflammation index (SII) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed our multi-institutional database to identify 2492 patients. SII was calculated as platelet count × neutrophil/lymphocyte count and evaluated at a cutoff of 485. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of SII with muscle-invasive and non-organ-confined (NOC) disease. Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of SII with recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival (RFS/CSS/OS). Results Overall, 986 (41.6%) patients had an SII > 485. On univariable logistic regression analyses, SII > 485 was associated with a higher risk of muscle-invasive (P = 0.004) and NOC (P = 0.03) disease at RNU. On multivariable logistic regression, SII remained independently associated with muscle-invasive disease (P = 0.01). On univariable Cox regression analyses, SII > 485 was associated with shorter RFS (P = 0.002), CSS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.004). On multivariable Cox regression analyses SII remained independently associated with survival outcomes (all P < 0.05). Addition of SII to the multivariable models improved their discrimination of the models for predicting muscle-invasive disease (P = 0.02). However, all area under the curve and C-indexes increased by < 0.02 and it did not improve net benefit on decision curve analysis. Conclusions Preoperative altered SII is significantly associated with higher pathologic stages and worse survival outcomes in patients treated with RNU for UTUC. However, the SII appears to have relatively limited incremental additive value in clinical use. Further study of SII in prognosticating UTUC is warranted before routine use in clinical algorithms. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s00262-021-02884-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Irene Resch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Noriyoshi Miura
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, Université François Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre Val de Loire, Tours, France
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science, and Public Health, Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Dmitry V Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology department, Sorbonne Université, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, GRC n°5, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Motlagh RS, Rink M, D'Andrea D, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Turk J Urol 2020; 47:S33-S44. [PMID: 33052841 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease, posing many challenges for the treating physician due to the lack of strong evidence-based recommendations. However, novel molecular discoveries and a better understanding of the clinical behavior of the disease lead to a continuous evolution of therapeutic landscape in UTUC. The aim of the review is to provide a comprehensive update of the current diagnostic modalities and treatment strategies in UTUC with a special focus on recent developments and challenges. A comprehensive literature search including relevant articles up to August 2020 was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed database. Despite several technological improvements, accurate staging and outcome prediction remain major challenges and hamper appropriate risk stratification. Kidney-sparing surgery can be offered in low risk UTUC; however, physician and patient must be aware of the high rate of recurrence and risk of progression due to tumor biology and understaging. The value and efficacy of intracavitary therapy in patients with UTUC remains unclear due to the lack of high-quality data. In high-risk diseases, radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template lymph node dissection is the standard of care. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy is today accepted as a novel standard for advanced cancers. In metastatic or unresectable disease, the therapeutic landscape is rapidly changing due to several novel agents, such as checkpoint inhibitors. While several diagnostic and treatment challenges remain, progress in endoscopic technology and molecular knowledge have ushered a new age in personalized management of UTUC. Novel accurate molecular and imaging biomarkers are, however, still needed to guide decision making as tissue acquisition remains suboptimal. Next generation sequencing and novel agents are promising to rapidly improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Inoue S, Mizushima T, Miyamoto H. Role of the androgen receptor in urothelial cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2018; 465:73-81. [PMID: 28652170 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Men have had a substantially higher risk of developing bladder cancer than women. This has prompted research on androgen-mediated androgen receptor (AR) signaling in urothelial cancer. Indeed, increasing preclinical evidence indicates that AR activation correlates with the promotion of urothelial carcinogenesis and tumor outgrowth. In this article, we summarize and discuss available data suggesting the involvement of androgens and the AR pathway in the development and progression of urothelial cancer. Although precise mechanisms for the functions of AR and related signals in urothelial cells remain far from being fully understood, current observations may offer effective chemopreventive and therapeutic approaches for urothelial cancer. Clinical application of various anti-AR therapies available for AR-dependent prostate cancer to urothelial cancer patients is thus anticipated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Inoue
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Taichi Mizushima
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Hiroshi Miyamoto
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|