Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging characterize CT-indeterminate renal masses? A prospective evaluation with histological confirmation

Pre-operative Prediction of Invasiveness in Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Role of Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

It is known that in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the invasiveness of the tumor is closely related to the treatment and prognosis. Currently, histologic diagnosis of RCC is typically established after surgical removal of tumors or after biopsy. The use of non-invasive imaging modalities to predict the invasiveness of RCC is of great clinical value, particularly before surgery. In this study, the differences in conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features between invasive and non-invasive RCC were analyzed with the aim of providing more accurate and valuable information for diagnosis and treatment to clinically optimize the treatment plan in a non-invasive manner and improve the prognosis of patients.

METHODS

Conventional US and CEUS features of 163 patients (total of 164 RCCs), obtained from the Lanzhou University Second Hospital in the period ranging from March 2021 to September 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups: invasive group (n = 44) and non-invasive group (n = 120), with surgical pathology as reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to evaluate the feasibility of differentiation.

RESULTS

The possibility of an intrarenal lesion/kidney ratio >50% in the invasive group (13/44, 29.5%) was significantly higher than that in the non-invasive group (8/120, 6.7%) (p < 0.001). The absence of perilesional rim-like enhancement was more likely to imply invasive RCC (30/44, 68.2%) than non-invasive RCC (100/120, 83.3%) (p = 0.049) and was an independent predictor of invasive RCC. As for CEUS quantitative features, there were statistically significant differences in peak intensity (p = 0.009) or peak enhancement (p = 0.010), taking the largest range of lesion as the region of interest.

CONCLUSION

Conventional US and CEUS features may help in the differentiation of invasive RCC from non-invasive RCC and have potential application value in the pre-operative prediction of RCC invasiveness.

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features for WHO/ISUP Grading in Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

By analyzing the differences of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features between low- and high-grade of WHO/ISUP grading, to explore the diagnostic value of CEUS in evaluating the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

The qualitative and quantitative features of CEUS in 69 patients with RCC confirmed by surgical pathology in the Lanzhou University Second Hospital from March to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups: low-grade group (n = 22) and high-grade group (n = 47), with surgical pathology as reference standard. The diagnostic performance of statistically significant CEUS features was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in enhancement degree (P = .032) and quantitative features such as slope_lesion (P = .034), the differences between lesion and cortex in arrive time (∆AT = AT_lesion  - AT_cortex , P = .013), peak intensity(∆PI = [PI_lesion  - PI_cortex ]/PI_cortex , P = .003), area under the curve (∆Area = Area_lesion  - Area_cortex , P = .008) in two groups, and the sensitivity was 70.2% and specificity was 71.4% of ∆PI, which has a high diagnostic performance in the differentiation of low-grade group from high-grade group (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS features such as ∆PI, may help differentiate low-grade RCC from high-grade RCC. CEUS has a promising application prospect in preoperative evaluation of the prognosis of RCC.

Clinical Value Study on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Enhanced CT in Early Diagnosis of Primary Hepatic Carcinoma

Objective. To explore the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with enhanced CT in the early diagnosis of primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC). Methods. 84 patients with suspected PHC in the early stage treated in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected as the study subjects. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced CT examinations, and the surgery was performed for resection of lesions within 1 month. According to the results of postoperative pathology diagnosis, the benign group and the malignant group were included. The case data were viewed for the retrospective study to analyze the clinical application value by evaluating the diagnostic efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, enhanced CT, and their combination for PHC. Results. Among 84 suspected patients, 70 patients had PHC (malignant group) and 14 patients had other hepatic lesions (benign group) after postoperative histopathological examination. There was no significant difference in age, gender, clinical symptoms, and educational level between the two groups ( $P>0.05$ ), with obvious differences in the history of chronic hepatic disease, smoking, drinking, and infection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) between the two groups ( $P<0.05$ ). The enhancement time and regression time of the two groups were significantly different ( $P<0.05$ ), with no statistical difference in the enhancement pattern of photography ( $P>0.05$ ). For patients with PHC, the imaging features of the two inspection methods at arterial phase and lag phase were statistically different ( $P<0.05$ ). Taking pathologic findings as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of joint diagnosis were significantly higher than those of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced CT ( $P<0.05$ ), and the area under the curve of joint diagnosis was obviously larger than that of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced CT by placing the ROC curve for examination ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. The combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced CT has a higher accuracy in the early diagnosis of PHC, and the diagnostic efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound is higher than that of enhanced CT. In clinical practice, the physical condition and state of illness in patients should be fully considered, and the most suitable examination method should be selected to reduce their medical burden by taking into account their economic situation.

Elastography in the Urological Practice: Urinary and Male Genital Tract, Prostate Excluded—Review

The aim of this article is to review the utility of elastography in the day-to-day clinical practice of the urologist. An electronic database search was performed on PubMed and Cochrane Library with a date range between January 2000 and December 2021. The search yielded 94 articles that passed the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles were reviewed and discussed by organ, pathology and according to the physical principle underlying the elastographic method. Elastography was used in the study of normal organs, tumoral masses, chronic upper and lower urinary tract obstructive diseases, dysfunctions of the lower urinary tract and the male reproductive system, and as a pre- and post-treatment monitoring tool. Elastography has numerous applications in urology, but due to a lack of standardization in the methodology and equipment, further studies are required.

Expanding the Role of Ultrasound for the Characterization of Renal Masses

The incidental detection of renal masses has been steadily rising. As a significant proportion of renal masses that are surgically treated are benign or indolent in nature, there is a clear need for better presurgical characterization of renal masses to minimize unnecessary harm. Ultrasound is a widely available and relatively inexpensive real-time imaging technique, and novel ultrasound-based applications can potentially aid in the non-invasive characterization of renal masses. Evidence acquisition: We performed a narrative review on novel ultrasound-based techniques that can aid in the non-invasive characterization of renal masses. Evidence synthesis: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) adds significant diagnostic value, particularly for cystic renal masses, by improving the characterization of fine septations and small nodules, with a sensitivity and specificity comparable to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, the performance of CEUS for the classification of benign versus malignant renal masses is comparable to that of computed tomography (CT) and MRI, although the imaging features of different tumor subtypes overlap significantly. Ultrasound molecular imaging with targeted contrast agents is being investigated in preclinical research as an addition to CEUS. Elastography for the assessment of tissue stiffness and micro-Doppler imaging for the improved detection of intratumoral blood flow without the need for contrast are both being investigated for the characterization of renal masses, though few studies have been conducted and validation is lacking. Conclusions: Several novel ultrasound-based techniques have been investigated for the non-invasive characterization of renal masses. CEUS has several advantages over traditional grayscale ultrasound, including the improved characterization of cystic renal masses and the potential to differentiate benign from malignant renal masses to some extent. Ultrasound molecular imaging offers promise for serial disease monitoring and the longitudinal assessment of treatment response, though this remains in the preclinical stages of development. While elastography and emerging micro-Doppler techniques have shown some encouraging applications, they are currently not ready for widespread clinical use.

The value of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with CT enhancement in the differentiation of subtypes of renal cell carcinoma

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the value of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the differential diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present study, 82 patients with CCRCC, 24 patients with PRCC, and 19 patients with CRCC were confirmed by pathology of the resected tumor. All patients were evaluated by CEUS and CECT before the operation. In addition, the contrast enhancement mode of CEUS and CECT and the contrast parameters of the region of interest (ROI) time-intensity curve between the lesions and the surrounding normal renal parenchyma by CEUS were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with the pathological results, the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the 3 groups was 87.8% (72/82), 83.3% (20/24) and 73.7% (14/19). There was no significant difference between CEUS and CECT in the diagnostic accuracy of all groups (P>0.05). Meanwhile, compared with the surrounding renal parenchyma by CEUS, 82.5% (66/80) of CCRCC lesions showed "fast-forward and fast/slow-retrograde," while 83.3% (20/24) of PRCC, and 84.2% (16/19) showed "slow-forward and fast/slow-retrograde." Significant differences in the enhancement modes of CEUS were found among the CCRCC, PRCC, and CRCC lesions (P < 0.05). And the enhancement modes could be quantitatively analyzed by the ROI time-intensity curve of the lesion. Moreover, lesions enhanced by CECT and 74.4% (61/82) of CCRCC lesions showed "fast-forward and fast/slow-retrograde," while 66.7% (16/24) of PRCC and 84.2% (16/19) of CRCC showed "slow-forward and fast/slow-retrograde." The contrast modes and enhancement uniformity of CEUS and CECT showed no significant differences among the CCRCC, PRCC, and CRCC lesions (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CEUS and quantitative analysis of ROI time-intensity curve can be used for differential diagnosis of the 3 RCC subtypes. The combination of CEUS and CECT can help us differentiate RCC subtypes and is of great significance for clinical treatment strategies and prognostication.

Surgical Insights for the Management of Variant Histology in Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To review the current literature regarding variant (non-clear) histology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the clinical management of these renal tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A PubMed database search was performed in May 2020 focusing on variant RCC, its diagnosis and associated syndromes, tumor characteristics, and options for management.

RESULTS

A broad range of pathological, clinical and diagnostic characteristics amongst non-ccRCC variants were found to have an impact on the overall management of these tumors. The imaging modalities, frequency of surveillance, and timing for intervention were found to be dependent on the type of genetic alterations, type of histology, and tumor growth rates. The timing and type of surgery as well as the systemic therapy are tailored to the specific tumor type and patient.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this review suggest that clinical management should be considered and adjusted for patients with non-ccRCC histological variants based on tumor subtype and genetic alterations.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) reliably rules out neoplasm in developmental renal pseudotumor

BACKGROUND

Renal pseudotumors appear as benign cortical hypertrophies and are typically assessed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to rule out malignancy.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can rule out renal neoplasm and thus potentially reduce cross-sectional imaging and further follow-up in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with presumption of developmental renal pseudotumor on CEUS between June 2011 and July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were examined with a standardized renal US protocol including B-mode, color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS), and CEUS by an experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3). Images were retrospectively interpreted in consensus by two highly experienced radiologists. Histopathological reports, cross-sectional imaging findings, and clinical course (treatment response, long-term imaging follow-up) were defined as standard of reference.

RESULTS

CEUS correctly identified 8/9 neoplastic lesions and missed one oncocytoma within the 32 included patients. Irregular vessel structure (88.9% vs. 13.0%, P = 0.007) and hyperenhancement (66.6% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.031) on CEUS were more common in neoplasm compared to developmental pseudotumors reaching statistical significance. Compared with the standard of reference, CEUS had 89% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 57-98), 96% specificity (95% CI 80-99), a positive predictive value of 89% (95% CI 57-98), and a negative predictive value of 96% (95% CI 79-99) for ruling out renal malignancy in developmental pseudotumors.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is a safe and fast method to rule out neoplasm in the diagnostic work-up of renal pseudotumors. In conjunction with B-mode and CCDS, CEUS has the potential to reduce further (invasive) diagnostic procedures.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging for active surveillance of small renal masses

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging for monitoring small (< 4 cm) renal masses (SRM) in patients undergoing active surveillance (AS).

METHODS

We retrospectively selected all consecutive patients with SRMs who underwent AS for at least 6 months at our Institution between January 2014 and December 2018. CEUS imaging was performed by two experienced genitourinary radiologists at established time points. The accuracy of CEUS for monitoring SRM size was compared with that of CT scan. For solid SRMs, four enhancement patterns (EP) were recorded. Radiological progression was defined as SRM growth rate ≥ 5 mm/year.

RESULTS

Overall, 158/1049 (15.1%) patients with SRMs underwent AS. At a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR 13-39), no patient died due to renal cell carcinoma (RCC). No patients experienced CEUS-related adverse events. There was a large variability in the pattern of growth of SRMs (overall median growth rate: 0.40 mm/year), with 9.5% of SRMs showing radiological progression. The median SRM size was comparable between CEUS and CT scan examinations at all time points. The vast majority (92.7%) of SRMs did not show a change in their EP over time; and there was no association between the SRM's EP and radiological progression or SRM size. Overall, 43 (27.2%) patients underwent delayed intervention (DI); median SRM size, and median growth rate were significantly higher in these patients as compared to those continuing AS.

CONCLUSION

In experienced hands, CEUS is a safe and effective strategy for active monitoring of SRMs in well-selected patients undergoing AS.

Can acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) accurately diagnose renal masses?: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Renal masses are increasingly being discovered because of the wide accessibility of modern high resolution imaging procedures. Previous clinical studies have reported that acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) is used for diagnosis of renal masses. However, no study has investigated this topic systematically. Therefore, this study will evaluate the diagnostic value of ARFI for the diagnosis of renal masses.

METHODS

A systematic search using the databases of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Pubmed, WANGFANG, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure will be performed to identify studies in which patients with renal masses are assessed by ARFI. Two investigators will independently screen the literature and extract the data. Any discrepancies will be resolved via discussion with the senior author. Study quality will be assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool, and pooled sensitivity and specificity of various ARFI findings for the diagnosis of renal masses will be determined. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve will be used to assess the overall performance of ARFI.

RESULTS

This study will evaluate the diagnostic value of ARFI for the diagnosis of renal masses through sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio.

CONCLUSION

This study will summarize the most recent evidence that focusing on the diagnosis of ARFI for renal masses.

STUDY REGISTRATION

INPLASY202060105.

Ultrasound 2020 - Diagnostics & Therapy: On the Way to Multimodal Ultrasound: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS), Microvascular Doppler Techniques, Fusion Imaging, Sonoelastography, Interventional Sonography

BACKGROUND

 Ultrasound as a non-ionizing imaging procedure is one of the most important diagnostic procedures in everyday clinical practice. The technology is widely used. Due to constant technical innovations, sonographic procedures, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), sonoelastography, new microvascular Doppler modalities and, as an example of interventional procedures, sonographically controlled microwave ablation (MWA), are becoming increasingly important in diagnostic imaging and interventional medicine alongside CT and MRI. However, this also requires greater expertise, specialization and qualification on the part of users.

METHOD

 This review article provides information about the range of technical innovations in ultrasound in recent years and describes the underlying technology, the clinical applications, and their diagnostic value. These are presented in the context of the current literature, explaining their advantages and disadvantages and their clinical value.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), microvascular Doppler modalities, fusion imaging and elastography complement B-scan ultrasound and conventional Doppler procedures for various problems. Microwave ablation (MWA) has a firm place as an ablative procedure for local tumor therapy in different organ systems and can be performed under ultrasound guidance. Thanks to new developments, the possibilities of ultrasound are now greater than ever. Knowledge of the technology, indications, and possible applications of newer procedures is essential for adequate patient care.

KEY POINTS

  · Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows an increase in sensitivity and specificity in the assessment of parenchymal lesions.. · CEUS allows the microperfusion to be visualized and quantified. For larger vessels, CEUS is an important instrument in diagnosing endoleak after stenting.. · Microvascular Doppler techniques with clutter suppression algorithms allow a more accurate representation of the smallest vessels than regular color or power Doppler.. · Elastography of the liver in diffuse hepatopathies is a noninvasive diagnostic tool to exclude higher grade fibrosis/cirrhosis.. · Microwave ablation (MWA) also offers sonographically controlled ablation of tumors..

CITATION FORMAT

· Kloth C, Kratzer W, Schmidberger J et al. Ultrasound 2020 - Diagnostics & Therapy: On the Way to Multimodal Ultrasound: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS), Microvascular Doppler Techniques, Fusion Imaging, Sonoelastography, Interventional Sonography . Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 23 - 32.

Comparison of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of unclear renal lesions

PURPOSE

 To compare the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of unclear renal lesions to the histopathological outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A total of 255 patients with a single unclear renal mass with initial imaging studies between 2005 and 2015 were included. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 86 with (mean age 62 years; SD ± 13). CEUS (255 patients), CT (88 out of 255 patients; 34.5 %) and MRI (36 out of 255 patients; 14.1 %) were used for determining malignancy or benignancy and initial findings were correlated with the histopathological outcome.

RESULTS

 CEUS showed a sensitivity of 99.1 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 96.7 %, 99.9 %), a specificity of 80.5 % (95 % CI: 65.1 %, 91.2 %), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.4 % (95 % CI: 93.0 %, 98.4 %) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.3 % (95 % CI: 80.8 %, 99.3 %). CT showed a sensitivity of 97.1 % (95 % CI: 89.9 %, 99.6 %), a specificity of 47.4 % (95 % CI: 24.4 %, 71.1 %), a PPV of 87.0 % (95 % CI: 77.4 %, 93.6 %) and a NPV of 81.8 % (95 % CI: 48.2 %, 97.7 %). MRI showed a sensitivity of 96.4 % (95 % CI: 81.7 %, 99.9 %), a specificity of 75.0 % (95 % CI: 34.9 %, 96.8 %), a PPV of 93.1 % (95 % CI: 77.2 %, 99.2 %) and a NPV of 85.7 % (95 % CI: 42.1 %, 99.6 %). Out of the 212 malignant lesions a total of 130 clear cell renal carcinomas, 59 papillary renal cell carcinomas, 7 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, 4 combined clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas and 12 other malignant lesions, e. g. metastases, were diagnosed. Out of the 43 benign lesions a total 10 angiomyolipomas, 3 oncocytomas, 8 benign renal cysts and 22 other benign lesions, e. g. renal adenomas were diagnosed. Using CEUS, 10 lesions were falsely identified as malignant or benign, whereas 8 lesions were false positive and 2 lesions false negative.

CONCLUSION

 CEUS is an useful method which can be additionally used to clinically differentiate between malignant and benign renal lesions. CEUS shows a comparable sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV to CT and MRI. In daily clinical routine, patients with contraindications for other imaging modalities can particularly benefit using this method.

KEY POINTS

  · Wide availability. · Safe applicability in patients with known renal insufficiency or allergies to iodine or gadolinium. · Comparable sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV to CT and MRT. · May lead to a reduction in interventional radiological or surgical interventions.

CITATION FORMAT

· Marschner CA, Ruebenthaler J, Schwarze V et al. Comparison of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of unclear renal lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 1053 - 1058.