1
|
Basile G, Bandini M, Li R, Poch MA, Necchi A, Spiess PE. Gold standard nephroureterectomy, chemoprophylaxis and surveillance in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Curr Opin Urol 2024:00042307-990000000-00208. [PMID: 39529478 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent evidence on surgical management, strategies to reduce tumor recurrence, and surveillance regimens in patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and elected for radical treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Minimally invasive surgery is gaining momentum in the surgical management of UTUC. Chemoprophylaxis is still the gold standard to reduce intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Novel surveillance strategies have been proposed to adapt follow-up regimens to patients' characteristics. SUMMARY Minimally invasive surgery has been associated with comparable oncological outcomes to the open approach while improving postoperative morbidity. In these cases, bladder cuff excision (BCE) is mostly performed by an extravesical approach, that demonstrates a noninferiority compared to the intravesical one in terms of oncological outcomes. Although lymphadenectomy is recommended in patients with high-risk tumors, its benefits are still unclear. Currently, there is a lack of recent prospective trials on chemoprophylaxis to reduce intravesical recurrence post RNU, making single-dose postoperative chemotherapy instillation the standard treatment. Although novel risk stratification models were released by international urological guidelines, their validity is mainly nonevidence-based. Risk-adapted follow-up strategies incorporating cystoscopy and cross-sectional imaging accounting for individual patient factors should be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Basile
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michael A Poch
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao J, Shen Y, Guo M, Matin SF, Hansel DE, Guo CC. Diagnostic accuracy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma using biopsy, urinary cytology, and nephroureterectomy specimens: A tertiary cancer center experience. Am J Clin Pathol 2024; 162:492-499. [PMID: 38860463 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqae065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We studied the diagnostic accuracy and discordance of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by comparing biopsy and urinary cytology with matched nephroureterectomy specimens. METHODS Sixty-nine patients with UTUC without neoadjuvant treatment were retrospectively identified who had matched biopsy and nephroureterectomy specimens. Twenty patients had concurrent upper tract cytology. H&E and cytology slides were re-reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS Patients included 48 men and 21 women with a mean age of 69 years. A concordant grade between biopsy and surgical specimen was present in 49 (71%) patients. The mean size of biopsy specimens in the discordant group was significantly smaller than that in the concordant group. Invasion was evaluated in 48 biopsy cases that had adequate subepithelial tissue, and 33 of them were diagnosed with concordant invasion status. Mean tumor size in both tumor grade and invasion discordant groups was significantly larger than that in the concordant group. High-grade urothelial carcinoma was detected in 84% of cases using urinary cytology. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates the diagnostic challenges of UTUC on small biopsy specimens. Biopsy specimen size and tumor size are significantly associated with the diagnostic discordance. Upper tract cytology showed high diagnostic accuracy and should be complementary to the biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianping Zhao
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Yuan Shen
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Ming Guo
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Charles C Guo
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Basile G, Gallioli A, Territo A, Verri P, Gaya JM, Afferi L, Diana P, Sanz I, Dieguez L, Uleri A, Berquin C, Gavrilov P, Algaba F, Palou J, Breda A. Cumulative morbidity of ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Actas Urol Esp 2024; 48:665-673. [PMID: 38735432 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess complications after ureteroscopy (URS) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) management and to assess its postoperative cumulative morbidity burden using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Single center retrospective study including patients submitted to URS for UTUC suspicion. URSs were both diagnostic and operative. Postoperative complications were recorded according to the EAU Guidelines and graded according to Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC). The cumulative postoperative morbidity burden developed by patients experiencing multiple events was assessed using the CCI. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analyses identified factors independently associated with the development of any grade and major postoperative complications. RESULTS Overall, 360 patients with UTUC suspicion were included with a total of 575 URSs performed. The cumulative number of all postoperative complications recorded was 111. In 86 (15%) procedures, patients experienced at least one postoperative complication, while 25 (4.3%) experienced more than one complication. Of these, 16 (14%) were severe (CDC ≥ IIIa). The most frequent type of complications were urinary (34%), bleeding (30%) and infectious (30%). The higher the CDC grade, the higher the median CCI, with a statistically significant increase in median CCI from CDC II to major complications. Patients who experienced intraoperative complications were at higher risk of developing any grade and major postoperative complications at MLR. CONCLUSIONS Complications after ureteroscopy for UTUC are relatively uncommon events. Patients who experience intraoperative complications are at higher risk of developing postoperative complications. The comprehensive complication index appeared more representative of the cumulative postoperative morbidity rather than the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Basile
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Servicio de Urología, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele, Milán, Italy.
| | - A Gallioli
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Territo
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Verri
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Servicio de Urología, Universidad de Turín, Turín, Italy
| | - J M Gaya
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Afferi
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Diana
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Sanz
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Dieguez
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Uleri
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Servicio de Urología, Universidad Humanitas, Rozzano, Milán, Italy
| | - C Berquin
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Gante, Bélgica, Centro acreditado en la Red Europea de Referencia (ERN) eUROGEN, Belgium
| | - P Gavrilov
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Algaba
- Área de Anatomía Patológica, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Palou
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Breda
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ditonno F, Franco A, Veccia A, Bertolo R, Wu Z, Wang L, Abdollah F, Finati M, Simone G, Tuderti G, Helstrom E, Correa A, De Cobelli O, Ferro M, Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Tufano A, Perdonà S, Bhanvadia R, Margulis V, Brönimann S, Singla N, Puri D, Derweesh IH, Mendiola DF, Gonzalgo ML, Ben-David R, Mehrazin R, Moon SC, Rais-Bahrami S, Yong C, Sundaram CP, Moghaddam FS, Ghoreifi A, Djaladat H, Autorino R, Antonelli A. Decisional and prognostic impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multi-institutional collaborative analysis (ROBUUST collaborative group). Urol Oncol 2024; 42:290.e1-290.e9. [PMID: 38760274 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) with or without biopsy remains a subject of contention in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with varying recommendations across different guidelines. The study aims to analyse the decision-making and prognostic role of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) in high-risk UTUC patients undergoing curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective multi-institutional analysis of high-risk UTUC patients from the ROBUUST dataset, a comparison between patients who received or not preoperative URS and biopsy before curative surgery was carried out. Logistic regression analysis evaluated differences between patients receiving URS and its impact on treatment strategy. Survival analysis included 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). After adjusting for high-risk prognostic group features, Cox proportional hazard model estimated significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 1,912 patients were included, 1,035 with preoperative URS and biopsy and 877 without. Median follow-up: 24 months. Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy was the most common procedure (55.1%), in both subgroups. The 5-year OS (P = 0.04) and CSS (P < 0.001) were significantly higher for patients undergoing URS. The 5-year RFS (P = 0.6), and MFS (P = 0.3) were comparable between the 2 groups. Preoperative URS and biopsy were neither a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes nor of a specific treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS The advantage in terms of OS and CSS in patients undergoing preoperative URS could derive from a better selection of candidates for curative treatment. The treatment strategy is likely more influenced by tumor features than by URS findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ditonno
- University of Verona, Department of Urology, Verona, Italy; Rush University, Department of Urology, Chicago, IL
| | - Antonio Franco
- Rush University, Department of Urology, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Zhenjie Wu
- Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University, Department of Urology, Shanghai, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University, Department of Urology, Shanghai, China
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Henry Ford Hospital, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Marco Finati
- Henry Ford Hospital, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Emma Helstrom
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andres Correa
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Matteo Ferro
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Division of Urology, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Division of Urology, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Division of Urology, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Department of Urology, Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Department of Urology, Naples, Italy
| | - Raj Bhanvadia
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, TX
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, TX
| | - Stephan Brönimann
- John Hopkins University, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nirmish Singla
- John Hopkins University, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dhruv Puri
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA
| | - Dinno F Mendiola
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Reuben Ben-David
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | - Sol C Moon
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Courtney Yong
- Indiana University, Department of Urology, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gravestock P, Cullum D, Somani B, Veeratterapillay R. Diagnosing upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A review of the role of diagnostic ureteroscopy and novel developments over last two decades. Asian J Urol 2024; 11:242-252. [PMID: 38680592 PMCID: PMC11053284 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The role of ureteroscopy in the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma is yet to be fully determined. We aimed to provide an up to date evaluation of its role and the emerging technologies in the field. Methods A literature search of the last two decades (from 24th May, 2001 to 24th May, 2021) was carried out identifying 147 papers for potential inclusion within this narrative review. Results Diagnostic ureteroscopy is undeniably useful in its ability to visualise and biopsy indeterminate lesions, and to risk stratify malignant lesions that may be suitable for kidney sparing surgery. However, an increased risk of intravesical recurrence following nephroureterectomy when a prior diagnostic ureteroscopy has been performed, inadequate sampling at biopsy, complications from the procedure, and difficult ureteric access are all potential drawbacks. Furthermore, whilst generally an accurate diagnostic procedure, it risks missing carcinoma in-situ lesions. Despite this, evidence shows that routine use of ureteroscopy changes the management of patients in a large proportion of cases, preventing unnecessary surgery or facilitating kidney sparing surgery. The overall rate of complications is low, and improved biopsy techniques and the use of tissue biomarkers for improved staging and grading are encouraging. The risks of delays to definitive management and post-ureteroscopy intravesical recurrence do not seem to affect survival, and trials are in progress to determine whether intravesical therapy can mitigate the latter. Further promising techniques are being investigated to improve shortcomings, particularly in relation to improved diagnosis of carcinoma in situ and preoperative staging. Conclusion Ureteroscopy has a role in the diagnosis of upper tract malignancy, though whether it should be used routinely is yet to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gravestock
- Urology Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Daniel Cullum
- Urology Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baard J, Cormio L, Dasgupta R, Maruzzi D, Rais-Bahrami S, Serrano A, Geavlete B, Giannakopoulos S, de la Rosette J, Laguna P. Unveiling the challenges of UTUC biopsies and cytology: insights from a global real-world practice study. World J Urol 2024; 42:177. [PMID: 38507109 PMCID: PMC10954852 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04866-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Diagnostic ureteroscopy (dURS) is optional in the assessment of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and provides the possibility of obtaining histology. METHODS To evaluate endoscopic biopsy techniques and outcomes, we assessed data from patients from the CROES-UTUC registry. The registry includes multicenter prospective collected data on diagnosis and management of patients suspected having UTUC. RESULTS We assessed 2380 patients from 101 centers. dURS with biopsy was performed in 31.6% of patients. The quality of samples was sufficient for diagnosis in 83.5% of cases. There was no significant association between biopsy techniques and quality (p = 0.458). High-grade biopsy accurately predicted high-grade disease in 95.7% and high-risk stage disease in 86%. In ureteroscopic low-grade tumours, the prediction of subsequent low-grade disease was 66.9% and low-risk stage Ta-disease 35.8%. Ureteroscopic staging correctly predicted non-invasive Ta-disease and ≥ T1 disease in 48.9% and 47.9% of patients, respectively. Cytology outcomes did not provide additional value in predicting tumour grade. CONCLUSION Biopsy results adequately predict high-grade and high-risk disease, but approximately one-third of patients are under-staged. Two-thirds of patients with low-grade URS-biopsy have high-risk stage disease, highlighting the need for improved diagnostics to better assess patient risk and guide treatment decisions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02281188; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02281188 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Luigi Cormio
- Department of Urology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Ranan Dasgupta
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniele Maruzzi
- Department of Urology, S. Maria Degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Departments of Urology and Radiology, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Alvaro Serrano
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Stilianos Giannakopoulos
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Basile G, Gallioli A, Martini A, Verri P, Robalino J, Dieguez L, Gavrilov P, Territo A, Uleri A, Gaya JM, Algaba F, Palou J, Breda A. Oncologic surveillance intensity after endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:88-96. [PMID: 38426423 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05593-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal oncologic surveillance in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) elected for conservative treatment is still a matter of debate. METHODS Patients elected for endoscopic treatment of UTUC were followed up according to EAU guidelines recommendations after treatment. Bladder cancer recurrence-free survival (BCa-RFS), UTUC recurrence-free survival (UTUC-RFS), radical nephroureterectomy-free survival (RNU-FS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The crude risks of BCa and UTUC recurrences over time were estimated with the Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing method. RESULTS Overall, 54 and 55 patients had low- and high-risk diseases, respectively. Median follow-up was 46.9 (IQR: 28.7-68.7) and 36.9 (IQR: 19.8-60.1) months in low and high-risk patients, respectively. In low-risk patients, BCa recurrence risk was more than 20% at 24 months follow-up. At 60 months, time point after which cystoscopy and imaging should be interrupted, the risk of BCa recurrence and UTUC recurrence were 14% and 7%, respectively. In high-risk patients, the risk of BCa and UTUC recurrence at 36 months was approximately 40% and 10%, respectively. Conversely, at 60 months, the risk of bladder recurrence and UTUC recurrence was 28% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS For low-risk patients, cystoscopy should be performed semi-annually until 24 months, while upper tract assessment should be obtained up to 60 months, as per current EAU guidelines recommendations. For high-risk patients, upper tract assessment should be intensified to semi-annually up to 36 months, then obtained yearly. Conversely, cystoscopy should be ideally performed semi-annually until 60 months and yearly thereafter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain -
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy -
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paolo Verri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Urology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Jorge Robalino
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lucia Dieguez
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pavel Gavrilov
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angelo Territo
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Urology, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Josep M Gaya
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bitaraf M, Ghafoori Yazdi M, Amini E. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4987. [PMID: 37894354 PMCID: PMC10605461 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Diagnosis and risk stratification are cornerstones of therapeutic decisions in the management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Diagnostic modalities provide data that can be integrated, to provide nomograms and stratification tools to predict survival and adverse outcomes. This study reviews cytology, ureterorenoscopy and the novel tools and techniques used with it (including photodynamic diagnosis, narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, and confocal laser endomicroscopy), and biopsy. Imaging modalities and novel biomarkers are discussed in another article. Patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors, their association with survival indices, and their roles in different scores and predictive tools are discussed. Patient-related factors include age, sex, ethnicity, tobacco consumption, surgical delay, sarcopenia, nutritional status, and several blood-based markers. Tumor-related prognosticators comprise stage, grade, presentation, location, multifocality, size, lymphovascular invasion, surgical margins, lymph node status, mutational landscape, architecture, histologic variants, and tumor-stroma ratio. The accuracy and validation of pre-operative predictive tools, which incorporate various prognosticators to predict the risk of muscle-invasive or non-organ confined disease, and help to decide on the surgery type (radical nephroureterectomy, or kidney-sparing procedures) are also investigated. Post-operative nomograms, which help decide on adjuvant chemotherapy and plan follow-up are explored. Finally, a revision of the current stratification of UTUC patients is endorsed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erfan Amini
- Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1419733141, Iran; (M.B.); (M.G.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gallioli A, Basile G, Territo A, Verri P, Gaya JM, Sanguedolce F, Aumatell J, Izquierdo P, Uleri A, Diana P, Huguet J, Algaba F, Palou J, Breda A. The importance of second-look ureteroscopy implementation in the conservative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2023; 41:2743-2749. [PMID: 37668716 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04577-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of second-look ureteroscopy (SU) in the endoscopic operative work-up of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with UTUC who underwent SU between 2016 and 2021 were included. Cancer detection rate (CDR) at SU was defined as endoscopic visualization of tumor. The effect of SU on recurrence-free survival (RFS), radical nephroureterectomy-free survival (RNU-FS), bladder cancer-free survival (BC-FS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLR) assessed predictors of negative SU. Finally, we evaluated the effect of SU timing on oncological outcomes, classifying SUs as "early" (≤ 8 weeks) and "late" (> 8 weeks). RESULTS Overall, 85 patients underwent SU. The CDR at SU was 44.7%. After a median follow-up was 35 (IQR: 15-56) months, patients with positive SU had a higher rate of UTUC recurrence (47.4% vs 19.1%, p = 0.01) and were more frequently radically treated (34.2% vs 8.5%, p = 0.007). Patients with high-grade disease (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14, 95% CI 1.18-8.31; p = 0.02) had a higher risk of UTUC recurrence, while high-grade tumor (HR: 3.87, 95%CI 1.08-13.77; p = 0.04) and positive SU (HR: 4.56, 95%CI 1.05-22.81; p = 0.04) were both predictors of RNU. Low-grade tumors [odds ratio (OR): 5.26, 95%CI 1.81-17.07, p = 0.003] and tumor dimension < 20 mm (OR: 5.69, 95%CI 1.48-28.31, p = 0.01) were predictors of negative SU. Finally, no significant difference emerged regarding UTUC recurrence, RNU, BC-FS, and CSM between early vs. late SUs (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS SU may help in identifying patients with UTUC experiencing an early recurrence after conservative treatment. Patients with low-grade and small tumors are those in which SU could be safely postponed after 8 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Angelo Territo
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Verri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Urology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Josep Maria Gaya
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Sanguedolce
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julia Aumatell
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paula Izquierdo
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Urology, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Diana
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Urology, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Jorge Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yoshida T, Ohe C, Nakamoto T, Kinoshita H. Learning from the past and present to change the future: Endoscopic management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol 2023; 30:634-647. [PMID: 37294007 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend endoscopic management (EM) for patients with low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, as well as those with an imperative indication. However, regardless of the tumor risk, radical nephroureterectomy is still mainly performed worldwide despite the benefits of EM, such as renal function maintenance, no hemodialysis requirement, and treatment cost reduction. This might be explained by the association of EM with a high risk of local recurrence and progression. Furthermore, the need for rigorous patient selection and close surveillance following EM may be relevant. Nevertheless, recent developments in diagnostic modalities, pathological evaluation, surgical devices and techniques, and intracavitary regimens have been reported, which may contribute to improved risk stratification and treatments with superior oncological outcomes. In this review, considering recent advances in endourology and oncology, we propose novel treatment strategies for optimal EM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Yoshida
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- Corporate Sponsored Research Programs for Multicellular Interactions in Cancer, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Chisato Ohe
- Corporate Sponsored Research Programs for Multicellular Interactions in Cancer, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pathology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Nakamoto
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pathology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Kinoshita
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Krajewski W, Łaszkiewicz J, Nowak Ł, Szydełko T. Current methods facilitating diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive literature review. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:230-238. [PMID: 36727755 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Currently, kidney-sparing surgeries are considered the preferred approach in low-risk tumours and in selected high-risk patients. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of UTUC is crucial for further management. The purpose of this review is to summarize available methods facilitating the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). RECENT FINDINGS Recent articles propose numerous techniques of UTUC diagnosis. In this review, imaging, as well as, urine-based and endoscopic methods have been described and assessed. SUMMARY Regarding imaging, computed tomography urography remains a gold standard, while PET is superior in search for small lesions and nodal metastases. However, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography also shows promise. On the contrary, available urine tests, such as urinary cytology, fluorescent in-situ hybridization, Xpert, DNA methylation analysis, urine-based liquid biopsy, p16/Ki-67 dual immunolabelling, ImmunoCyt and NMP22 are either poorly researched, or not accurate enough to use solely. Finally, during ureterorenoscopy, photodynamic diagnosis and narrow-band imaging can facilitate proper visualization of the tumor. Endoluminal ultrasonography and confocal laser endomicroscopy can potentially improve staging and grading of UTUC. Also, the 'form tackle' biopsy should be performed using a basket in papillary lesions and cold-cup biopsy of flat or sessile lesions. Even though cryobiopsy shows promise in UTUC diagnosis, in-vivo studies are necessary before it is introduced into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shvero A, Carmona O, Zilberman DE, Dotan ZA, Haifler M, Kleinmann N. Strategies of Endoscopic Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma among Endourologists: A Global Survey. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040591. [PMID: 37108977 PMCID: PMC10143047 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Up-to-date guidelines on the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are continuously published. We aim to assess the variability of diagnosis and treatment strategies in the endoscopic management of UTUC and adherence to European Association of Urology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. A 15-question survey was designed to query practitioners on approaches to clinical practice and knowledge about endoscopic treatment indications and techniques. It was emailed to all members of the Endourologic Society through the society’s office, and to all Israeli non-member endourologists. Eighty-eight urologists participated in the survey. Adherence to guidelines on indications for endoscopic management was only 51%. Most of the survey respondents (87.5%) use holmium laser for tumor ablation, and ~50% use forceps for biopsy while the other half use baskets. Only 50% stated that they would use Jelmyto® for specific indications. Most (80%) indicated that they repeat the ureteroscopy 3 months after the first one, and 52.3% continue with follow-up ureteroscopy every 3 months during the first year after diagnosis. There is vast variability among endourologists in the technical aspects of UTUC, the indications for endoscopic management, and adherence to the available guidelines for managing UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asaf Shvero
- The Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel; (O.C.); (D.E.Z.); (Z.A.D.); (M.H.); (N.K.)
- The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +972-3-5303893
| | - Orel Carmona
- The Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel; (O.C.); (D.E.Z.); (Z.A.D.); (M.H.); (N.K.)
- The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Dorit E. Zilberman
- The Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel; (O.C.); (D.E.Z.); (Z.A.D.); (M.H.); (N.K.)
- The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Zohar A. Dotan
- The Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel; (O.C.); (D.E.Z.); (Z.A.D.); (M.H.); (N.K.)
- The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Miki Haifler
- The Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel; (O.C.); (D.E.Z.); (Z.A.D.); (M.H.); (N.K.)
- The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Nir Kleinmann
- The Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel; (O.C.); (D.E.Z.); (Z.A.D.); (M.H.); (N.K.)
- The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zollinger BW, Shoen EJ, Gresham CF, Whalen MJ. Current laser therapy options for endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Curr Urol 2023; 17:62-67. [PMID: 37692140 PMCID: PMC10487284 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic management via retrograde ureteroscopic laser ablation of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has become the preferred treatment modality for low-risk tumors. The most popular ablative lasers over the past 15-20 years have been the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) and neodymium (Nd:YAG) lasers, but recently the thulium (Th:YAG) laser has emerged as a potential alternative. This review compares the mechanism of action, physiological properties and effects, and oncologic outcomes of Ho:YAG/Nd:YAG lasers versus the Th:YAG laser for UTUC treatment. Potential advantages of the Th:YAG laser over existing technologies are outlined, followed by a discussion of emerging laser technologies in UTUC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ezra J. Shoen
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles F. Gresham
- Department of Urology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michael J. Whalen
- Department of Urology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chien AL, Chua KJ, Doppalapudi SK, Ghodoussipour S. The role of endoscopic management and adjuvant topical therapy for upper tract urothelial cancer. FRONTIERS IN UROLOGY 2022; 2:916259. [PMID: 38855025 PMCID: PMC11160966 DOI: 10.3389/fruro.2022.916259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has traditionally been managed with radical nephroureterectomy, and while this approach remains the gold standard for high-risk disease, endoscopic, kidney-sparing management has increasingly been adopted for low-risk disease as it preserves kidney function without compromising oncologic outcomes. Ureteroscopy and percutaneous renal access not only provide diagnoses by tumor visualization and biopsy, but also enable treatment with electrocautery or laser ablation. Several modalities exist for laser ablative treatments including thulium:YAG, neodymium:YAG, holmium:YAG, and combinations of the preceding. Furthermore, due to high recurrence rates after endoscopic management, adjuvant intracavitary instillation of various agents such as mitomycin C and bacillus Calmette-Guerin have been used given benefits seen in non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Other formulations also being studied include gemcitabine, anthracyclines, and immunotherapies. More recently, Jelmyto, a mitomycin reverse thermal gel, has been developed to allow for adequate drug delivery time and potency since urine flow could otherwise dilute and washout topical therapy. In this article, the authors review techniques, indications, best practices, and areas of current investigation in endoscopic management and adjuvant topical therapy for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin L. Chien
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Kevin J. Chua
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Sai Krishnaraya Doppalapudi
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Annular-shaped stenosis in the ureter: Caution should be taken. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:274.e7-274.e14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
16
|
Klein JT, John A, Bohnert L, Enderle MD, Linzenbold W, Bolenz C. Improving the Quality of Human Upper Urinary Tract Specimens by Cryobiopsy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:810367. [PMID: 35223492 PMCID: PMC8881114 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.810367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe quality of histopathological specimens obtained from the upper urinary tract with conventional flexible ureterorenoscopic biopsy needs to be improved. We investigated the feasibility and biopsy quality of specimens obtained by cryobiopsy, compared with standard ureterorenoscopic biopsy techniques in a human ex vivo model.Materials and MethodsHuman ureters obtained from nephrectomy specimens (N=12) were dissected and canulated with an ureteral access sheath. Ureterorenoscopic biopsies were randomly obtained from different sites of the renal pelvic caliceal system using different types of instruments. The performance of two newly developed flexible cryoprobes with outer diameters of 1.1 mm (CB11) and 0.9 mm (CB09) was compared with that of the biopsy forceps(FB) and Bigopsy®(BiG) and two different Dormia baskets N‐Gage (NG) and Zero‐Tip (ZT). We assessed the feasibility of the various biopsy techniques based on the number of biopsy attempts needed to obtain macroscopically discernible biopsies. The specimens were examined histopathologically for size, biopsy quality, presence of various artifact types, and representativeness.ResultsBiopsies taken with the cryoprobes showed a higher biopsy quality than biopsies taken with the comparative instruments. The CB11 provided significantly larger biopsies than forceps biopsies and also than biopsies with ZT. The CB09 was able to collect larger samples when compared with the FB and BiG biopsy forceps. There were no significant differences in artifact area, except for the CB11 cryoprobe compared with the NG. To clarify the results a subdivision of larger or smaller than 20% artifact area was performed. A significant difference was found between CB11 and the forceps biopsies, as well as between CB11 and NG and ZT in favor of the cryoprobe. The representation of the histopathological sample was also determined. Biopsies taken with CB11 were more representative compared with forceps biopsies BiG and FB and basket biopsies NG and ZT.ConclusionsIn a standardized comparative ex vivo setting, larger biopsies were obtained by using the cryobiopsy technique with the CB11 probe. Qualitatively, cryobiopsy specimens were overlaid by fewer artifacts and a higher biopsy quality was achieved in histopathologic examination compared with standard instrumentation. Further stepwise development will transfer the promising cryobiopsy technique into the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan T. Klein
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Axel John
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lars Bohnert
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Markus D. Enderle
- Department of Research and Basic Technologies, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Walter Linzenbold
- Department of Research and Basic Technologies, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Christian Bolenz
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- *Correspondence: Christian Bolenz,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Klett DE, Alom M, Wymer K, Potretzke A. A novel upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique: the "form tackle". Int Braz J Urol 2021; 48:367-368. [PMID: 34907769 PMCID: PMC8932032 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5% of all urothelial malignancies (
1
–
3
). Accurate pathologic diagnosis is key and may direct treatment decisions. Current ureteroscopic biopsy techniques include cold-cup, backloaded cold-cup and stone basket (
4
–
6
). The study objective was to compare a standard cold-cup biopsy technique to a novel cold-cup biopsy technique and evaluate histopathologic results. Materials and Methods: We developed a novel UTUC biopsy technique termed the “form tackle” biopsy. Ureteroscope is passed into ureter/renal collecting system. Cold-cup forceps are opened and pressed into the lesion base (to engage the urothelial wall/submucosal tissue) then closed. Ureteroscope/forceps are advanced forward 3-10mm and then extracted from the patient. We compared standard versus novel upper tract biopsy techniques in a series of patients with lesions ≥1cm. In each procedure, two standard and two novel biopsies were obtained from the same lesion. The primary study aim was diagnosis of malignancy. IRB approved: 21-006907. Results: Fourteen procedures performed on 12 patients between June 2020 and March 2021. Twenty-eight specimens sent (14 standard, 14 novel) (Two biopsies per specimen). Ten procedures with concordant pathology. In 4 procedures the novel biopsy technique resulted in a diagnosis of UTUC (2 high-grade, 2 low-grade) in the setting of a benign standard biopsy. Significant difference in pathologic diagnoses was detected between standard and novel upper tract biopsy techniques (p=0.008). Conclusions: The “form tackle” upper tract ureteroscopic biopsy technique provides higher tissue yield which may increase diagnostic accuracy. Further study on additional patients required. Early results are encouraging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dane E Klett
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Manaf Alom
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kevin Wymer
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mori K, Katayama S, Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Grossmann NC, Rajwa P, Zimmermann K, Karakiewicz PI, Abufaraj M, Fajkovic H, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Enikeev DV, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Discordance Between Clinical and Pathological Staging and Grading in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 20:95.e1-95.e6. [PMID: 34764007 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to evaluate the concordance in tumor stage and grade between ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Records of 1,214 UTUC patients who had undergone URS biopsy followed by RNU were included. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors contributing to the pathological upstaging. RESULTS The concordance between URS biopsy-based clinical and RNU pathological staging was 34.5%. Clinical understaging occurred in 59.5% patients. Upstaging to muscle-invasive disease occurred in 240 (41.7%) of 575 patients diagnosed with ≤cT1 disease. Of those diagnosed with muscle-invasive disease on final pathology, 89.6% had been clinically diagnosed with ≤cT1 disease. In the univariable analyses, computed tomography urography (CTU)-based invasion, ureter location, hydronephrosis, high-grade cytology, high-grade biopsy, sessile architecture, age, and women sex were significantly associated with pathological upstaging (P < .05). In the multivariable analyses, CTU-based invasion and hydronephrosis remained associated with pathological upstaging (P < .05). URS biopsy-based clinical and pathological gradings were concordant in 634 (54.2%) patients. Clinical undergrading occurred in 496 (42.4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Clinical understaging/undergrading and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease occurred in a high proportion of UTUC patients undergoing RNU. Despite the inherent selection bias, these data underline the challenges of accurate UTUC staging and grading. In daily clinical practice, URS biopsy and CTU offer the most accurate preoperative information albeit with limited predictive value when used alone. These findings should be considered when utilizing preoperative, risk-adapted strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, France; Université François Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre Val de Loire, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | | | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, F-75013 PARIS, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Dmitry V Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lenfant L, Breda A, Xylinas E, Babjuk M, Moschini M, Rouprêt M. Current Evidence and Future Perspectives in the Management of Nonmetastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:464-471. [PMID: 34561205 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This case-based discussion describes the management of a 66-yr-old man who presented to the emergency department with gross hematuria. His urine cytology was benign, and computed tomography (CT) with nephrographic phase revealed a 2.5 cm filling defect within the left renal pelvis and luminal narrowing in the right proximal ureter with hydronephrosis. CT showed no lymphadenopathy and no sign of metastatic disease. Cystoscopy was normal. In a progressive case-based discussion fashion, we will discuss the diagnostic and treatment options with two different perspectives: (1) guidelines-based current standard of care and (2) an outlook on future perspectives using the latest scientific advances that may soon become the standard of care. PATIENT SUMMARY: This presentation of a real-life clinical scenario will be useful in describing the current standard of care and future perspectives regarding the diagnosis and treatment of upper urinary tract tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Lenfant
- Urology, GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Breda
- Fundació Puigvert, Department of Urology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Evangelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marco Moschini
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sanguedolce F, Fontana M, Turco M, Territo A, Balañá Lucena J, Calderón Cortez J, Vanacore D, Meneghetti I, Gallioli A, Gaya JM, Palou Redorta J, Breda A. Endoscopic Management of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Oncologic Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in a Contemporary Cohort. J Endourol 2021; 35:1593-1600. [PMID: 33971725 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Appropriate risk stratification and complete tumor ablation are the key factors to optimize the oncologic outcomes of patients undertaking endoscopic management for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We aimed to identify risk factors associated to tumor recurrence and progression in a contemporary cohort of patients diagnosed and treated with the latest endourologic technologies. Patients and Methods: Forty-seven patients were selected between January-2015 and March-2019 for an endoscopic management of UTUC. Last generation of digital ureteroscopes with image-enhancing technologies were used for the detection of the lesions. The retrograde approach was the most frequent access (n = 45/47). The confocal laser endomicroscopy and multiple biopsy devices were variably used according to site and tumor presentation for their characterization. Holmium and Thulium lasers were variably used, with their combination being the preferred approach in case of larger lesions. Primary endpoints included the identification of factors associated with UTUC recurrence and progression, and bladder tumor recurrence. Results: Median follow-up (FU) was 24 months (interquartile range 17-44). On multivariate analysis, bladder cancer (BC) recurrence was associated to previous contralateral UTUC (hazard ratios: 5.08 confidence interval [95% CI: 1.35-18.94], p < 0.05) and tumor size (hazard ratios: 1.07 [95% CI: 1.00-1.14], p < 0.05). UTUC recurrence was associated to incomplete clearance after primary treatment (hazard ratios: 4.99 [95% CI: 1.15-21.62], p < 0.05), while UTUC progression was significantly related to the number of UTUC recurrences (hazard ratios: 3.10 [95% CI: 1.27-7.53], p < 0.05). No significant survival differences in BC/UTUC recurrence, as well as in UTUC progression, were detected between risk groups. No Clavien-Dindo grade >2 were detected; one patient developed ureteric stricture at 7-month FU. Limitations involve retrospective nature of the study and relatively small number of patients. Conclusions: The appropriate use of latest technology may enhance the oncologic outcomes of the endoscopic management of UTUC without compromising the safety of the approach. Among the prognostic factors identified in our series, UTUC recurrence seems to be associated to disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Sanguedolce
- Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Universitá degli Studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Matteo Fontana
- Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Morena Turco
- Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angelo Territo
- Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Davide Vanacore
- Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Iacopo Meneghetti
- Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Alberto Breda
- Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aumatell J, Huguet J, Subiela JD, Gaya JM, Faba ÓR, Territo A, Palou J, Breda A. Endoscopic exploration directly impacts clinical decision making in the management of patients with suspected upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:732.e1-732.e8. [PMID: 33863619 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess whether the use of endoscopic exploration (EE) as a routine diagnostic tool in patients with clinical suspicion of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) following radical cystectomy (RC) significantly impacts management decision-making and to describe the oncological outcomes of patients with UTUC after RC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective review of medical records of patients with suspicion of UTUC after RC between 2000 and 2019. Patient demographics, clinicopathological features, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS We identified 60 patients with suspicion of UTUC. After diagnostic work-up, 16 were submitted to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and 44 underwent diagnostic EE. After EE, a further 18/44 (40.9%) were submitted to RNU, while no evidence of tumor was found in 12 (27.3%) and the remaining 12 (27.3%) underwent endoscopic treatment (ET). Thus, in 24/44 (54.5%) patients the primary treatment strategy, i.e., RNU, was altered. Twenty-nine (85.3%) of the 34 patients who underwent RNU had high-grade tumors and 16 (47%) had the muscle-invasive disease. In the ET group, 6 (50%) had high-grade tumors and 10 (83.4%) had tumors less than 2 cm. The 5-year estimated recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were, respectively, 58.4% and 45.6% in the RNU group and 25% and 80.8% in the ET group. CONCLUSION EE significantly impacts clinical decision-making in patients with suspicion of UTUC after RC, resulting in a change in treatment strategy in approximately half of the patients. UTUC following RC has a poor prognosis and although RNU is the gold standard, ET could be considered in a selected group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Júlia Aumatell
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jorge Huguet
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Daniel Subiela
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M Gaya
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Óscar Rodríguez Faba
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angelo Territo
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rodrigues Pessoa R, Morrison JC, Konety B, Gershman B, Maroni P, Kukreja JB, Cost N, Flaig T, Kessler E, Sharma P, Kim SP. National trends in clinical and pathologic staging for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Implications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:832.e9-832.e15. [PMID: 33820697 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With growing support of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), current biopsy methods are challenging, and little is known as to the degree to which patients would appropriately receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) from biopsy alone. Herein, we sought to assess the rates of appropriate clinical use of NAC and identify clinicopathologic factors associated with aggressive UTUC amongst patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically localized disease. METHODS From 2004 to 2013, we identified all treatment naïve patients diagnosed with clinically localized, high grade UTUC (cTa-4Nx) who underwent RNU from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Pathologic criteria for NAC (pT2-4N0,x; pTanyN1) from RNU represented the primary outcome. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were utilized to identify covariates associated with primary outcome to determine appropriate use of NAC. RESULTS During the study interval, 5,362 patients were diagnosed with clinically localized UTUC and underwent RNU. Overall, 49.1% of patients presented with an unknown primary tumor stage (Tx) and 24.5% had invasive UTUC from biopsy. On multivariable analysis, upper tract tumor size was associated with invasive UTUC eligible for NAC (all P < 0.05). Amongst patients with cTx UTUC from biopsy, half of patients had pathologic noninvasive UTUC (pTa,is,1) from RNU and would be overtreated with NAC. CONCLUSION Significant uncertainty persists in assigning primary upper tract tumor depth and represents a key barrier to widespread implementation of NAC for patients with high grade UTUC. Further research is needed to more accurately determine clinical criteria to identify patients for NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey C Morrison
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Badrinath Konety
- Rush University Medical Center, Division of Urology, Chicago, IL
| | - Boris Gershman
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Urologic Surgery, Boston, MA
| | - Paul Maroni
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Janet B Kukreja
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Nicholas Cost
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO; Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Thomas Flaig
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO
| | - Elizabeth Kessler
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO
| | - Pranav Sharma
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Urology, Lubbock, TX
| | - Simon P Kim
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO; Yale University, Cancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Territo A, Gallioli A, Meneghetti I, Fontana M, Huguet J, Palou J, Breda A. Diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: friend or foe? Arab J Urol 2021; 19:46-58. [PMID: 33763248 PMCID: PMC7954478 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2021.1883810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The European Association of Urology guidelines recommend offering kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumours. Cystoscopy, urinary cytology, and computed tomography urography (CTU) do not always allow correct disease staging and grading, and sometimes there is even a lack of certainty regarding the diagnosis of UTUC. Diagnostic ureteroscopy (d-URS) may therefore be of crucial importance within the diagnostic framework and fundamental in establishing the appropriate therapeutic approach. Evidence acquisition and synthesis A systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Risk of bias was assessed using Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). Overall, from 3791 identified records, 186 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Finally, after a quantitative review of the selected literature, with the full agreement of all authors, 62 studies were considered relevant for this review. Results CTU has a sensitivity and specificity for UTUC of 92% and 95% respectively, but is not able to detect small or flat lesions with adequate accuracy. The sensitivity of voided urinary cytology for UTUC is around 67–76% and ranges from 43% to 78% for selective ureteric urine collection. As no technique offers a diagnosis of certainty, d-URS can allow an increase in diagnostic accuracy. In the present review the pros and cons of d-URS were analysed. This technique may provide additional information in the selection of patients suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or KSS, distinguishing between normal tissue and low- and high-grade UTUC thanks to the emerging technologies. Conclusions Information obtainable from d-URS and ureteroscopic-guided biopsy can prove extremely valuable when the diagnosis of UTUC is doubtful or KSS is being considered. Notwithstanding concerns remain regarding the potential risk of bladder recurrence, cancer dissemination, and/or delay in radical treatment. Abbreviations: CLE: confocal laser endomicroscopy; CSS: cancer-specific survival; CTU: CT urography; d-URS: diagnostic ureteroscopy; EAU: European Association of Urology; HR: hazard ratio; IMAGE1S: Storz professional imaging enhancement system; IVR: intravesical recurrence; KSS: kidney-sparing surgery; MFS: Metastasis-free survival; NAC: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NBI: narrow-band imaging; OCT: optical coherence tomography; RFS: Recurrence-free survival; RNU: radical nephroureterectomy; ROBINS-I: Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions; URS(-GB): Ureteroscopy(-guided biopsy); UTUC: upper tract urothelial carcinoma; UUT: upper urinary tract
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Territo
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Iacopo Meneghetti
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matteo Fontana
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Huguet
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Use of the T-1470 LiteTouch™ Laser in the En Bloc Resection of an Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer. Case Rep Urol 2021; 2021:6623326. [PMID: 33575056 PMCID: PMC7857907 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6623326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic laser-ablative therapy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma offers kidney-sparing treatment for well-selected low-risk tumors. The traditional technique consists of tumor biopsy with flexible forceps or nitinol basket for pathologic assessment of stage and grade, followed by laser ablation of the tumor. In this case, we present the use of the new T-1470 LiteTouch™ laser for intraoperative tumor en bloc resection, affording both tissue acquisition and tumor ablation. Case Presentation. An 81-year-old female with a past medical history significant for stage 4 chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and gout was diagnosed with a 2 cm left upper tract high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma confirmed by cytology with cell block preparation. Using a novel approach, the tumor was resected, en bloc, using the T-1470 LiteTouch™ laser which allowed for sufficient tissue resection for pathologic examination and strong hemostasis. This new technique is the first recorded example of tumor en bloc resection using the T-1470 LiteTouch™ laser of an upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Conclusion The use of the T-1470 LiteTouch™ laser offers promise for its use as a novel laser for the endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. It shows potential for advantages over current techniques through its ability to achieve en bloc resection and superior hemostasis.
Collapse
|
25
|
Almås B, Øverby S, Halvorsen OJ, Reisæter LAR, Carlsen B, Beisland C. Preoperative predictors of pathological tumour stage and prognosis may be used when selecting candidates for intensified treatment in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Scand J Urol 2021; 55:100-107. [PMID: 33517813 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1877343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensified treatment such as extended lymph node dissection (LND) and/or perioperative chemotherapy in addition to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) has been suggested for high-risk cases of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We aimed to identify preoperative predictors of tumour stage and prognosis in the diagnostic work-up before RNU. Further to evaluate if our findings could be used in selecting patients for intensified treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 179 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at Haukeland University Hospital (HUS) and Vestfold Hospital Trust (VHT) during 2005-2017 were included in this retrospective study. All relevant preoperative variables regarding the patient, the CT and the ureteroscopy (URS) were registered and analysed regarding their ability to predict non-organ confined disease (NOCD, pT3+ and/or N+) at final pathology after RNU. The prognosis was assessed calculating survival for the cohort and stratified by preoperative variables. RESULTS Local invasion and pathological lymph nodes at CT predicted NOCD in uni and multivariate regression analyses (OR 3.36, p=.004 and OR 6.21, p=.03, respectively). Reactive oedema surrounding the tumour (OR 2.55, p=.02), tumour size (4.8 vs. 3.9 cm, p=.006) and high-grade tumour at URS biopsy (OR 3.59, p=.04) predicted NOCD at univariate regression analyses. The 5-year CSS and OS for the entire cohort was 79% and 60%. ECOG, local invasion, pathological lymph nodes and reactive oedema surrounding the tumour at CT predicted CSS. CONCLUSIONS Several variables at the CT predicted both stage and survival. Local invasion at CT seems the most promising feature for selecting patients for intensified treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarte Almås
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Stein Øverby
- Department of Urology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Ole J Halvorsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars A R Reisæter
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Birgitte Carlsen
- Department of Pathology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shvero A, Zilberman DE, Dotan ZA, Laufer M, Fridman E, Winkler H, Kleinmann N. Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma-tips and tricks. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1815-1820. [PMID: 32944545 PMCID: PMC7475684 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.01.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Ureteroscopic methods have been rapidly evolving in the last several decades. With advances in flexible devices, optics and laser technologies, the endourologic surgeon has now the tools to treat high-volume tumors, in difficult locations, with good oncologic outcome. This makes radical nephroureterectomy unnecessary in some cases. Endoscopy in the setting of UTUC will surely continue to evolve and become applicable to a wider selection of patients. In this review we describe the surgical technique and provide tips and tricks which we use in our practice of endoscopic retrograde treatment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asaf Shvero
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel Affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dorit E Zilberman
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel Affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Zohar A Dotan
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel Affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Maneham Laufer
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel Affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eddie Fridman
- Department of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel Affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Harry Winkler
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel Affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nir Kleinmann
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel Affiliated with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Freund JE, Duivenvoorden MJC, Sikma BT, Vernooij RWM, Savci-Heijink CD, Legemate JD, de Reijke TM. The Diagnostic Yield and Concordance of Ureterorenoscopic Biopsies for Grading of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Dutch Nationwide Analysis. J Endourol 2020; 34:907-913. [PMID: 32483982 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and concordance of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) grading between ureterorenoscopic biopsies and surgical resections. Materials and Methods: The nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry (nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands [PALGA]) was searched for UTUC-positive renal units (RUs) with histopathology excerpts from ureterorenoscopic biopsies and surgical resections, matched for laterality and localization of the tumor, from 2011 until 2018. The positive predictive value (concordance) of the biopsy grade with regard to the final grade according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 classification was calculated. Results: A total of 1002 UTUC-positive rental units were included, of which 776 UTUC-positive RUs were graded according to the WHO 2004 classification in the ureterorenoscopic biopsy, the localization-matched surgical resection, or in both. The diagnostic yield of biopsies for a classifying diagnosis was 89% with a sensitivity for UTUC of 84%. In case of UTUC, the diagnostic yield for biopsy-based grading and staging was 97% and 72%, respectively. The concordance of high-grade biopsies with regard to the final histopathology was 97% and 62% for low-grade biopsies. Upgrading to final high grade occurred in 33% of the low-grade biopsies. Downgrading to final low grade occurred in 2% of high-grade biopsies. Conclusions: This is the first study to portray the limitations of ureterorenoscopic biopsies for UTUC in a nationwide cohort. The diagnostic yield of ureterorenoscopic biopsies for a classifying diagnosis is suboptimal, but the diagnostic yield for grading according to the WHO 2004 classification is high. Yet, a worrisome amount of ureterorenoscopic biopsies are upgraded with regard to the surgical resection. Consequently, one-third of patients, who qualify for kidney-sparing treatment according to one of the criteria recommended for risk stratification, might be stratified incorrectly. These findings stress the importance of a timely and stringent ureterorenoscopic follow-up after kidney-sparing surgery and highlight the need for improvements in the diagnostic approach to optimize the risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Erik Freund
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mylène J C Duivenvoorden
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boukje T Sikma
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robin W M Vernooij
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jaap D Legemate
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Subiela JD, Territo A, Mercadé A, Balañà J, Aumatell J, Calderon J, Gallioli A, González-Padilla DA, Gaya JM, Palou J, Breda A. Diagnostic accuracy of ureteroscopic biopsy in predicting stage and grade at final pathology in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1989-1997. [PMID: 32674841 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of ureteroscopic (URS) biopsies in predicting stage and grade at final pathology in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS The meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Studies providing data on tumor stage and grade at URS biopsy and surgical specimens were included. The negative predictive value (NPV) implies concordance between the absence of subepithelial connective tissue invasion or the presence of low-grade tumors at URS biopsy and the absence of a muscle-invasive disease in the final pathology. RESULTS A total of 23 studies were included (3547 patients). The stage-to-stage match between URS biopsy/final pathology showed a positive predictive value (PPV) for cT1+/muscle-invasive disease of 94% (95% CI: 84%-100%) and a NPV for cTa-Tis/non-muscle-invasive disease of 60% (95% CI: 52%-68%). The grade-to-grade match between URS biopsy/final pathology was 66% (95% CI: 55%-77%) for low-grade (cLG/pLG) tumors and 97% (95% CI: 94%-98%) for high-grade (cHG/pHG) tumors. The PPV for cHG/muscle-invasive disease was 60% (95% CI: 54%-66%) and the NPV for cLG/non-muscle-invasive disease was 77% (95% CI: 73%-82%). The undergrading and understaging rates were 32% (95%CI: 25%-38%) and 46% (95% CI: 38%-54%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS There is a substantial correlation between tumor grade at URS biopsy and the final pathology. The identification of cHG tumors and subepithelial connective tissue invasion (cT1+) in URS biopsy showed a moderate and a strong correlation with invasive UTUC, respectively. Nevertheless, a certain risk of undergrading and understaging should be assumed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Daniel Subiela
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Angelo Territo
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Asier Mercadé
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Josep Balañà
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Julia Aumatell
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Julio Calderon
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Via della Commenda, 10, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Josep Maria Gaya
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Joan Palou
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Alberto Breda
- Oncology Urology Unit, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer de Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gallioli A, Boissier R, Territo A, Vila Reyes H, Sanguedolce F, Gaya JM, Regis F, Subiela JD, Palou J, Breda A. Adjuvant Single-Dose Upper Urinary Tract Instillation of Mitomycin C After Therapeutic Ureteroscopy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Single-Centre Prospective Non-Randomized Trial. J Endourol 2020; 34:573-580. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Romain Boissier
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Urology, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, La Conception Academic Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Angelo Territo
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Helena Vila Reyes
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Sanguedolce
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Maria Gaya
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Federica Regis
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Daniel Subiela
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Taylor J, Meng X, Ghandour R, Margulis V. Advancements in the clinical management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:1051-1060. [PMID: 31770492 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1698295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains a complex disease to manage given challenges in staging, surgical resection, use of perioperative therapy, and prevention of bladder recurrences. High-level evidence is limited to guide management; however, recent data have shifted treatment paradigms. We intend to review recent evidence on advancements in the clinical management for UTUC.Areas covered: This review summarizes advancements in pre-operative work-up, surgical technique, and the use of intravesical and systemic therapy in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Special comment is made on progress in the genomics of UTUC and how that can inform clinical practice.Expert opinion: Advancements in the clinical management of UTUC are most prominently being made in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting. Although level I evidence is sparse, data from both single and multi-institutional retrospective studies strongly encourage the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy especially in high-risk or advanced-stage patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Taylor
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rashed Ghandour
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Somani BK, Ploumidis A, Pappas A, Doizi S, Babawale O, Dragos L, Sener E, Talso M, Tefik T, Kronenberg P, Emiliani E, Villa L, Kamphuis G, Proietti S, Traxer O. Pictorial review of tips and tricks for ureteroscopy and stone treatment: an essential guide for urologists from PETRA research consortium. Transl Androl Urol 2019; 8:S371-S380. [PMID: 31656743 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.06.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
With an increase in the number of ureteroscopy (URS) procedures, URS is now performed more widely and is becoming a standard procedure for all urologists. There is also a rise in the complexity of these procedures and URS is now offered for treatment of stones as well as for diagnosis and treatment of urothelial tumours. We wanted to provide a 'pictorial review' of the 'tips and tricks' of URS, as the finer and technical details are often easier to understand and remember with images rather than through textual explanations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Steeve Doizi
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°20 LITHIASE RENALE, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | | | - Laurian Dragos
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Victor Babes, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Emre Sener
- Urology Department, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Tzevat Tefik
- Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Esteban Emiliani
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luca Villa
- Division of Experimental Oncology and Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Kamphuis
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia Proietti
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Ville Turro Division, Milan, Italy
| | - Olivier Traxer
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°20 LITHIASE RENALE, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fojecki G, Magnusson A, Traxer O, Baard J, Osther PJS, Jaremko G, Seitz C, Knoll T, Giusti G, Brehmer M. Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2019; 37:2271-2278. [PMID: 30915526 PMCID: PMC6825655 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02732-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To summarize knowledge on upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) regarding diagnostic procedures, risk factors and prognostic markers. Methods A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase. Consensus was reached through discussions at Consultation on UTUC in Stockholm, September 2018. Results Tumor stage and grade are the most important prognostic factors. CT urography (CTU) including corticomedullary phase is the preferred imaging modality. A clear tumor on CTU in combination with high-grade UTUC in urine cytology identifies high-risk UTUC, and in some cases indirect staging can be obtained. Bladder urine cytology has limited sensitivity, and in most cases ureterorenoscopy (URS) with in situ samples for cytology and histopathology are mandatory for exact diagnosis. Image-enhancing techniques, Image S1 and narrow-band imaging, may improve tumor detection at URS. Direct confocal laser endomicroscopy may help to define grade during URS. There is strong correlation between stage and grade, accordingly correct grading is crucial. The correlation is more pronounced using the 1999 WHO than the 2004 classification: however, the 1999 system risks greater interobserver variability. Using both systems is advisable. A number of tissue-based molecular markers have been studied. None has proven ready for use in clinical practice. Conclusions Correct grading and staging of UTUC are mandatory for adequate treatment decisions. Optimal diagnostic workup should include CTU with corticomedullary phase, URS with in situ cytology and biopsies. Both WHO classification systems (1999 and 2004) should be used to decrease risk of undergrading or overtreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grzegorz Fojecki
- Department of Urology, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sønderborg, Denmark
| | | | | | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Holland
| | - Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
- Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Georg Jaremko
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Knoll
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital University Tuebingen, Sindelfingen, Germany
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Ville Turro Division, Milan, Italy
| | - Marianne Brehmer
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|