1
|
Guang ZLP, Kristensen G, Røder A, Brasso K. Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Whole-Gland HIFU as the Primary Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102101. [PMID: 38811288 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is regarded as a promising alternative treatment option for localized prostate cancer (PCa) as it has been proposed to offer similar oncologic control to the standard of care, but with significantly reduced treatment-related side effects. This systematic literature review assesses the available evidence of whole-gland HIFU as primary treatment for localized PCa. METHODS MEDLINE (PubMed) was searched for studies investigating oncological and functional outcomes following whole-gland HIFU as primary treatment for localized PCa. Our primary outcomes for the review were biochemical disease-free survival rates (BDFS), overall and PCa-specific survival rates as well as negative biopsy rates. Our secondary outcomes were functional results and complications of the treatment. RESULTS A total of 375 articles were identified, of which 35 were included in the present review. All 35 articles were prospective or retrospective case series. Mean/median duration of follow-up across studies was 10.9 to 94 months, and 6618 patients were included in the review. The BDFS rate varied greatly across studies from 21.7% to 89.2% during follow-up. The 10-year PCa-specific survival rate following HIFU was 90%, 99%, and 100% in 3 studies. Negative biopsy rates post-HIFU ranged from 20% to 92.7% across studies. Common side effects to HIFU included urinary incontinence (grade 1: 0%-22.7%), erectile dysfunction (11.6%-77.1%), urinary tract infections (1.5%-47.9%), and bladder outlet obstruction mainly as urethral strictures (7%-41.2%). CONCLUSION Great variation in oncological and functional outcomes was seen across studies. More prospective trials are needed before whole-gland HIFU can be considered as a treatment option for localized PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhilin Liu Peter Guang
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Gitte Kristensen
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andreas Røder
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus Brasso
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deivasigamani S, Kotamarti S, Rastinehad AR, Salas RS, de la Rosette JJMCH, Lepor H, Pinto P, Ahmed HU, Gill I, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Emberton M, Lawrentschuk N, Wysock J, Feller JF, Crouzet S, Kumar M P, Seguier D, Adams ES, Michael Z, Abreu A, Jack Tay K, Ward JF, Shinohara K, Katz AE, Villers A, Chin JL, Stricker PD, Baco E, Macek P, Ahmad AE, Chiu PKF, Crawford ED, Rogers CG, Futterer JJ, Rais-Bahrami S, Robertson CN, Hadaschik B, Marra G, Valerio M, Chong KT, Kasivisvanathan V, Tan WP, Lomas D, Walz J, Guimaraes GC, Mertziotis NI, Becher E, Finelli A, Kasraeian A, Lebastchi AH, Vora A, Rosen MA, Bakir B, Arcot R, Yee S, Netsch C, Meng X, de Reijke TM, Tan YG, Regusci S, Benjamin TGR, Olivares R, Noureldin M, Bianco FJ, Sivaraman A, Kim FJ, Given RW, Dason S, Sheetz TJ, Shoji S, Schulman A, Royce P, Shah TT, Scionti S, Salomon G, Laguna P, Tourinho-Barbosa R, Aminsharifi A, Cathelineau X, Gontero P, Stabile A, Grummet J, Ledbetter L, Graton M, Stephen Jones J, Polascik TJ. Primary Whole-gland Ablation for the Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Focal Therapy Society Best Practice Statement. Eur Urol 2023; 84:547-560. [PMID: 37419773 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Whole-gland ablation is a feasible and effective minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Previous systematic reviews supported evidence for favorable functional outcomes, but oncological outcomes were inconclusive owing to limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the real-world data on the mid- to long-term oncological and functional outcomes of whole-gland cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with clinically localized PCa, and to provide expert recommendations and commentary on these findings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library publications through February 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. As endpoints, baseline clinical characteristics, and oncological and functional outcomes were assessed. To estimate the pooled prevalence of oncological, functional, and toxicity outcomes, and to quantify and explain the heterogeneity, random-effect meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-nine studies were identified, including 14 on cryoablation and 15 on HIFU with a median follow-up of 72 mo. Most of the studies were retrospective (n = 23), with IDEAL (idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term study) stage 2b (n = 20) being most common. Biochemical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival rates at 10 yr were 58%, 96%, 63%, 71-79%, and 84%, respectively. Erectile function was preserved in 37% of cases, and overall pad-free continence was achieved in 96% of cases, with a 1-yr rate of 97.4-98.8%. The rates of stricture, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, rectourethral fistula, and sepsis were observed to be 11%, 9.5%, 8%, 0.7%, and 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The mid- to long-term real-world data, and the safety profiles of cryoablation and HIFU are sound to support and be offered as primary treatment for appropriate patients with localized PCa. When compared with other existing treatment modalities for PCa, these ablative therapies provide nearly equivalent intermediate- to long-term oncological and toxicity outcomes, as well as excellent pad-free continence rates in the primary setting. This real-world clinical evidence provides long-term oncological and functional outcomes that enhance shared decision-making when balancing risks and expected outcomes that reflect patient preferences and values. PATIENT SUMMARY Cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound are minimally invasive treatments available to selectively treat localized prostate cancer, considering their nearly comparable intermediate- to long term cancer control and preservation of urinary continence to other radical treatments in the primary setting. However, a well-informed decision should be made based on one's values and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Srinath Kotamarti
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Herbert Lepor
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Urology, Imperial College London & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Inderbir Gill
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Wysock
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Denis Seguier
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Urology, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Eric S Adams
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zoe Michael
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andre Abreu
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - John F Ward
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katsuto Shinohara
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Aaron E Katz
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnauld Villers
- Department of Urology, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Joseph L Chin
- Department of Urology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Eduard Baco
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Ardalan E Ahmad
- Department of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter K F Chiu
- Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - E David Crawford
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Craig G Rogers
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jurgen J Futterer
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cary N Robertson
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, The University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Service of Urology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Wei Phin Tan
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Derek Lomas
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Amir H Lebastchi
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anup Vora
- Chesapeake Urology, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Mark A Rosen
- Department of Urology, Sutter Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Baris Bakir
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Rohit Arcot
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Urology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Samuel Yee
- Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yu Guang Tan
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Stefano Regusci
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Swiss International Prostate Centelenor, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Ruben Olivares
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Fernando J Bianco
- Urological Research Network, Urologist Specialist Group, Miami Lakes, FL, USA
| | - Arjun Sivaraman
- Division of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Fernando J Kim
- Division of Urology, Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Shawn Dason
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Tyler J Sheetz
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sunao Shoji
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ariel Schulman
- Department of Urology, Maimonides Health Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Royce
- Division of Urology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Division of Urology, Imperial College London & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Georg Salomon
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Clinic Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Alireza Aminsharifi
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, The University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeremy Grummet
- Division of Urology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leila Ledbetter
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Margaret Graton
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Thomas J Polascik
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khan F, Jones K, Lyon P. Immune checkpoint inhibition: a future guided by radiology. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220565. [PMID: 36752570 PMCID: PMC10321249 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The limitation of the function of antitumour immune cells is a common hallmark of cancers that enables their survival. As such, the potential of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) acts as a paradigm shift in the treatment of a range of cancers but has not yet been fully capitalised. Combining minimally and non-invasive locoregional therapies offered by radiologists with ICI is now an active field of research with the aim of furthering therapeutic capabilities in medical oncology. In parallel to this impending advancement, the "imaging toolbox" available to radiologists is also growing, enabling more refined tumour characterisation as well as greater accuracy in evaluating responses to therapy. Options range from metabolite labelling to cellular localisation to immune checkpoint screening. It is foreseeable that these novel imaging techniques will be integrated into personalised treatment algorithms. This growth in the field must include updating the current standardised imaging criteria to ensure they are fit for purpose. Such criteria is crucial to both appropriately guide clinical decision-making regarding next steps of treatment, but also provide reliable prognosis. Quantitative approaches to these novel imaging techniques are also already being investigated to further optimise personalised therapeutic decision-making. The therapeutic potential of specific ICIs and locoregional therapies could be determined before administration thus limiting unnecessary side-effects whilst maintaining efficacy. Several radiological aspects of oncological care are advancing simultaneously. Therefore, it is essential that each development is assessed for clinical use and optimised to ensure the best treatment decisions are being offered to the patient. In this review, we discuss state of the art advances in novel functional imaging techniques in the field of immuno-oncology both pre-clinically and clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faraaz Khan
- Foundation Doctor, Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
| | - Keaton Jones
- Academic Clinical Lecturer Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Lyon
- Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carroll J, Coutermarsh-Ott S, Klahn SL, Tuohy J, Barry SL, Allen IC, Hay AN, Ruth J, Dervisis N. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of solid tumors: a pilot study in canine cancer patients. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:855-864. [PMID: 35848421 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2097323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of solid tumors in a spontaneous canine cancer model. METHODS Dogs diagnosed with subcutaneous solid tumors were recruited, staged and pretreatment biopsies were obtained. A single HIFU treatment was delivered to result in partial tumor ablation using a commercially available HIFU unit. Tumors were resected 3-6 days post HIFU and samples obtained for histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Total RNA was isolated from paired pre and post treated FFPE tumor samples, and quantitative gene expression analysis was performed using the nCounter Canine IO Panel. RESULTS A total of 20 dogs diagnosed with solid tumors were recruited and treated in the study. Tumors treated included Soft Tissue Sarcoma (n = 15), Mast Cell Tumor (n = 3), Osteosarcoma (n = 1), and Thyroid Carcinoma (n = 1). HIFU was well tolerated with only 1 dog experiencing a clinically significant adverse event. Pathology confirmed the presence of complete tissue ablation at the HIFU targeted site and immunohistochemistry indicated immune cell infiltration at the treated/untreated tumor border. Quantitative gene expression analysis indicated that 28 genes associated with T-cell activation were differentially expressed post-HIFU. CONCLUSIONS HIFU appears to be safe and feasible for the treatment of subcutaneous canine solid tumors, resulting in ablation of the targeted tissue. HIFU induced immunostimulatory changes, highlighting the canine cancer patient as an attractive model for studying the effects of focal ablation therapies on the tumor microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Carroll
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Sheryl Coutermarsh-Ott
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Shawna L Klahn
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Joanne Tuohy
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Sabrina L Barry
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Irving C Allen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.,Department of Basic Science Education, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | - Alayna N Hay
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Ruth
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Nick Dervisis
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA.,ICTAS Center for Engineered Health, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kuroki T, Shoji S, Uchida T, Akiba T, Kabuki S, Nagao R, Fukuzawa T, Matsumoto Y, Katsumata T, Futakami N, Mikami T, Nakano Y, Toyoda Y, Takazawa T, Kunieda E, Sugawara A. Comparing the toxicity and disease control rate of radiotherapy for prostate cancer between salvage settings after high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy and initial settings. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2022; 63:675-683. [PMID: 35780303 PMCID: PMC9303605 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrac039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the toxicity and disease control rate of radiotherapy for prostate cancer in salvage settings after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy (HIFU cohort) with those in radical settings (non-HIFU cohort). From 2012 to 2020, 215 patients were identified for this study and 17 were treated in the salvage settings after HIFU. The median follow-up time was 34.5 months (range: 7-102 months, inter-quartile range [IQR]: 16-64 months). Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events were evaluated in acute and late periods with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5, and the rates of biochemical-clinical failure free survival (BCFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. The cumulative incidence of late GU Grade 2 or greater toxicity after five years was significantly different between the non-HIFU and HIFU cohorts with rates of 7.3% and 26.2%, respectively (P = 0.03). Regarding GI Grade 2 or greater toxicity, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts. The 5y-BCFS was 84.2% in the non-HIFU cohort and 69.5% in the HIFU cohort with no significant difference (P = 0.10) and the 5y-OS was 95.9% and 92.3%, respectively (P = 0.47). We concluded that the possibility of increased late GU Grade 2 or greater should be considered when applying salvage radiotherapy for local recurrence after HIFU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihisa Kuroki
- Corresponding author: Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital. 1838, Ishikawamachi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0032, Japan, , Tel: +81-42-639-1111, Fax: +81-42-639-1112
| | - Sunao Shoji
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Toyoaki Uchida
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Takeshi Akiba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, 1838 Ishikawamachi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Shigeto Kabuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Ryuta Nagao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Yoshitsugu Matsumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Tomomi Katsumata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Natsumi Futakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, 1838 Ishikawamachi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0032, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Mikami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Yoji Nakano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Yuri Toyoda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Takazawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Etsuo Kunieda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Akitomo Sugawara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lo Verde K, Toledano H, Campagna J, Rossi D, Bastide C, Baboudjian M. Long-term outcomes of whole gland high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 2022; 54:1233-1238. [PMID: 35397077 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03156-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the 10-year oncologic and functional outcomes of whole-gland HIFU as first-line treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were retrospectively included between January 2005 and July 2018 from a prospectively maintained database at a single academic institution. No patient underwent androgen deprivation therapy prior to HIFU. Primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). Secondary oncological endpoints included salvage treatment-free survival (STFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 97 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. According to D'Amico classification, the numbers of patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease were 38 (39.2%), 52 (53.6%), and 7 (7.2%). A total of 21 (21.6%) patients received salvage treatment at a mean of 4.1 years (± 2.8) after HIFU. The 10-year OS, CSS and BRFS rates were 91.8%, 100% and 40.3% in the overall cohort, respectively. In multivariate analysis, predictive factors for biochemical recurrence were intermediate-risk group (RR = 2.065; 95% CI 1.008-4.230; p = 0.047) and PSA nadir > 0.5 ng/mL (RR = 4.963; 95% CI 2.251-10.947; p < 0.001). Symptoms related to bladder outlet obstruction were the most frequently recorded adverse events. In multivariate analysis, positive biopsy on the prostatic apex was predictor of obstructive complications (RR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.092-9.476, p = 0.034). Only four patients developed severe urinary incontinence (> 1 pad/day). CONCLUSIONS HIFU showed low PCa-specific mortality, but biochemical recurrence rates were highly variable among patients. Future studies are needed to improve patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Lo Verde
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Harry Toledano
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.,Department of Urology, Martigues Hospital, Martigues, France
| | - Jennifer Campagna
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Dominique Rossi
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Cyrille Bastide
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France. .,Department of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France. .,Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Applications of Focused Ultrasound in the Treatment of Genitourinary Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061536. [PMID: 35326687 PMCID: PMC8945954 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cancer is a prevalent disease globally, and conventional treatment options have been associated with substantial morbidity for patients. The unique acoustic properties and biological effects of focused ultrasound have been investigated for use as an alternative treatment option for various forms of cancer with lower associated morbidity than standard treatments. The objective of our review was to assess the current state and various applications of focused ultrasound for the treatment of genitourinary cancers, including prostate, kidney, bladder, penile, and testicular malignancies. Current research demonstrates that focused ultrasound-based focal therapy shows promise for the treatment of localized prostate and kidney cancer, and the effect of ultrasound on cell membranes may increase the efficacy of chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy. Focused ultrasound-based treatment modalities should continue to be investigated as an alternative or complementary treatment option for cancer patients. Abstract Traditional cancer treatments have been associated with substantial morbidity for patients. Focused ultrasound offers a novel modality for the treatment of various forms of cancer which may offer effective oncological control and low morbidity. We performed a review of PubMed articles assessing the current applications of focused ultrasound in the treatment of genitourinary cancers, including prostate, kidney, bladder, penile, and testicular cancer. Current research indicates that high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) focal therapy offers effective short-term oncologic control of localized prostate and kidney cancer with lower associated morbidity than radical surgery. In addition, studies in mice have demonstrated that focused ultrasound treatment increases the accuracy of chemotherapeutic drug delivery, the efficacy of drug uptake, and cytotoxic effects within targeted cancer cells. Ultrasound-based therapy shows promise for the treatment of genitourinary cancers. Further research should continue to investigate focused ultrasound as an alternative cancer treatment option or as a complement to increase the efficacy of conventional treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Peters I, Derlin K, Peperhove MJ, Hensen B, Pertschy S, Wolters M, von Klot CAJ, Wacker F, Hellms S. First experiences and results after cryoablation of prostate cancer with histopathological evaluation and imaging-based follow-up. Future Oncol 2022; 18:1705-1716. [PMID: 35255716 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To share our experience after 28 cryoablation treatments for prostate cancer (PCa) with histopathology, clinical data and MRI as the follow-up methods. Methods: Clinical follow-up comprised prostate specific antigen (PSA)-measurements, PSA-density and quality-of-life-parameters. multi-parametric (mp)MRI pre- and post-cryoablation were retrospectively re-analyzed in 23 cases using Likert scores. Follow-up-histopathology was performed via MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided and/or systematic biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. Results: 17 PCa (61%) were diagnosed within 12-month post-cryotherapy (infield and out-of-field disease). PSA levels and PSA density were not significantly different between patients with or without PCa recurrence. mpMRI can characterize the decrease in prostate volume and necrosis. Area under the curve for the detection of PCa was 81% (global Likert scores), 74-87% (T2), 78% (diffusion weighted imaging) and 57-78% (dynamic contrast enhanced imaging; Youden-selected cutoff ≥3). Conclusion: Besides histopathological evaluation and control biopsy, MRI might have the potential to accurately detect PCa after cryotherapy. Clinical data and interdisciplinary communication are required for efficient monitoring after cryoablation treatments for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Peters
- Department of Urology & Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Katja Derlin
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Matti Joonas Peperhove
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Bennet Hensen
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Stefanie Pertschy
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Mathias Wolters
- Department of Urology & Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | | | - Frank Wacker
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Susanne Hellms
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bründl J, Osberghaus V, Zeman F, Breyer J, Ganzer R, Blana A, Gierth M, Denzinger S, Burger M, Rosenhammer B. Oncological Long-term Outcome After Whole-gland High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer-21-yr Follow-up. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:134-140. [PMID: 33483288 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Owing to the morbidity of established radical treatment options for prostate cancer, alternative whole-gland and focal treatment strategies have emerged. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is one of the most studied sources for tissue ablation and has been used since the 1990s. OBJECTIVE To provide 21-yr oncological long-term follow-up data of an unselected series of patients who underwent whole-gland HIFU for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 674 patients were treated between November 1997 and November 2012 in one university center. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The oncological outcome was assessed by biopsy failure-free survival (BFFS), salvage treatment-free survival (STFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to estimate the prognostic relevance of clinical variables. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In total, 560 patients were included into the evaluation and the median follow-up was 15.1 yr, with a range up to 21.4 yr. At 15 yr, CSS rates for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were 95%, 89%, and 65%, respectively; MFS, STFS-1 (salvage treatment other than HIFU), STFS-2 (salvage treatment including repeat HIFU), and BFFS rates were 91%, 85%, and 58%; 77%, 63%, and 29%; 67%, 52%, and 28%; and 82%, 73%, and 47%, respectively. Preoperative high-risk category was an independent predictor of inferior OS, CSS, MFS, STFS, and BFFS. CONCLUSIONS Although whole-gland HIFU achieved good long-term cancer control in low- and intermediate-risk patients, high-risk patients should not be treated routinely by HIFU. Intermediate-risk patients achieve high CSS and MFS rates, but a relevant salvage treatment rate has to be reckoned with. Long-term data after whole-gland therapy might help derive implications for focal treatment sources and patient selection. PATIENT SUMMARY Long-term data after whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy are crucial to prove its oncological efficacy, and may help derive implications for focal treatment strategies and patient selection. In this context, whole-gland HIFU achieved good long-term cancer control up to 21 yr in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Owing to considerably inferior long-term cancer control, it should not routinely be used in high-risk PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Vera Osberghaus
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Florian Zeman
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roman Ganzer
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Bad Tölz, Bad Tölz, Germany
| | - Andreas Blana
- Department of Urology, Fürth Hospital, Fürth, Germany
| | - Michael Gierth
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Denzinger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Rosenhammer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
He Y, Tan P, He M, Hu L, Ai J, Yang L, Wei Q. The primary treatment of prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e22610. [PMID: 33031318 PMCID: PMC7544371 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We systematically evaluated the evidences on oncological and functional outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as the primary treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS A systematic review was used Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from the inception of each database. The review analyzed the oncological and functional outcomes of HIFU in the treatment of PCa. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for quantity analysis incidence of complications. RESULTS Twenty-seven articles were included for analysis with a total of 7393 patients. Eighteen studies investigated the whole-gland HIFU, and the duration of follow-up ranged from 2 to 168 months. After whole-gland HIFU, the mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir was found to be 0.4 to 1.95 ng/mL and the mean time to PSA nadir was 2.4 to 5.4 months. The rate of positive biopsy after HIFU was 4.5% to 91.1%. Meta-analysis revealed the incidences of urinary incontinence, impotence, urinary obstruction, retention, and infection was 10%, 44%, 15%, 11%, 7%, respectively. Nine studies investigated partial-gland HIFU, and the duration of follow-up was 1 to 131 months. After partial-gland HIFU, the mean PSA nadir was 1.9 to 2.7 ng/mL and the mean time to PSA nadir 5.7 to 7.3 months. The rate of positive biopsy after HIFU in the treatment area was 14% to 37.5%. Meta-analysis revealed the incidences of urinary incontinence, impotence, urinary obstruction, retention, and infection was 2%, 21%, 2%, 9%, 11%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Early evidence suggested the partial-gland HIFU was safer than whole-gland HIFU, and they had similar oncological outcomes. More prospective randomized controlled trials of whole-gland and partial-gland HIFU for PCa was needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue He
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
- Department of Urology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining
| | - Ping Tan
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Mingjing He
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Liang Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jianzhong Ai
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Lu Yang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| |
Collapse
|