1
|
Gomaa I, Aboelmaaty S, Narasimhan AL, Bhatt H, Day CN, Harmsen WS, Rumer KK, Perry WR, Mathis KL, Larson DW. The Impact of Enhanced Recovery on Long-Term Survival in Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3233-3241. [PMID: 38381207 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14998-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implementing perioperative interventions such as enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) has improved short-term outcomes and minimized length of stay. Preliminary evidence suggests that adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol may also enhance 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) in colorectal cancer surgery. This retrospective study presents long-term survival outcomes and disease recurrence from a high-volume, single-center practice. METHODS All patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma and undergoing elective minimally invasive surgery (MIS) were retrospectively reviewed between February 2005 and April 2018. Relevant data were extracted from Mayo electronic records and securely stored in a database. Short-term morbidity and long-term oncological outcomes were compared between patients enrolled in ERP and those who received non-enhanced care. RESULTS Overall, 600 rectal cancer patients underwent MIS, of whom 320 (53.3%) were treated according to the ERP and 280 (46.7%) received non-enhanced care. ERP was associated with a decrease in length of stay (3 vs. 5 days; p < 0.001) and less overall complications (34.7 vs. 54.3%; p < 0.001). The ERP group did not show an improvement in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) compared with non-enhanced care on multivariable (non-ERP vs. ERP OS: hazard ratio [HR] 1.268, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.852-1.887; DFS: HR 1.050, 95% CI 0.674-1.635) analysis. CONCLUSION ERP was found to be associated with a reduction in short-term morbidity, with no impact on long-term oncological outcomes, such as OS, CSS, and DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Gomaa
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sara Aboelmaaty
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Himani Bhatt
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Courtney N Day
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kristen K Rumer
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William R Perry
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kellie L Mathis
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David W Larson
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quintana-Bertó R, Padilla-Iserte P, Lago V, Tauste C, Díaz-Feijoo B, Cabrera S, Oliver-Pérez R, Coronado PJ, Martín-Salamanca MB, Pantoja-Garrido M, Marcos-Sanmartin J, Cazorla E, Lorenzo C, Rodríguez-Hernández JR, Roldán-Rivas F, Gilabert-Estellés J, Muruzábal JC, Cañada A, Domingo S. Endometrial cancer: predictors and oncological safety of tumor tissue manipulation. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:1098-1105. [PMID: 37668932 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03310-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The main goal of this study is to assess the impact of tumor manipulation on the presence of lympho-vascular space invasion and its influence on oncological results. METHODS We performed a retrospective multi-centric study amongst patients who had received primary surgical treatment for apparently early-stage endometrial cancer. A multivariate statistical analysis model was designed to assess the impact that tumor manipulation (with the use of uterine manipulator or preoperative hysteroscopy) has on lympho-vascular development (LVSI) in the final surgical specimen. RESULTS A total of 2852 women from 15 centers were included and divided into two groups based on the lympho-vascular status in the final surgical specimen: 2265 (79.4%) had no LVSI and 587 (20.6%) presented LVSI. The use of uterine manipulator was associated with higher chances of lympho-vascular involvement regardless of the type used: Balloon manipulator (HR: 95% CI 4.64 (2.99-7.33); p < 0.001) and No-Balloon manipulator ([HR]: 95% CI 2.54 (1.66-3.96); p < 0.001). There is no evidence of an association between the use of preoperative hysteroscopy and higher chances of lympho-vascular involvement (HR: 95% CI 0.90 (0.68-1.19); p = 0.479). CONCLUSION Whilst performing common gynecological procedures, iatrogenic distention and manipulation of the uterine cavity are produced. Our study suggests that the use of uterine manipulator increases the rate of LVSI and, therefore, leads to poorer oncological results. Conversely, preoperative hysteroscopy does not show higher rates of LVSI involvement in the final surgical specimen and can be safely used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Quintana-Bertó
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain.
| | - Pablo Padilla-Iserte
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain
| | - Víctor Lago
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain
| | - Carmen Tauste
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Berta Díaz-Feijoo
- Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Cabrera
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Reyes Oliver-Pérez
- Gynecologic Oncology-Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pluvio J Coronado
- Women's Health Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Pantoja-Garrido
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Josefa Marcos-Sanmartin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante, Spain
- Department of Public Health, Miguel Hernández University, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Alicante, Spain
- Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - Eduardo Cazorla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain
| | - Cristina Lorenzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Nuestra Señora de La Calendaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | | | - Fernando Roldán-Rivas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinico Lozano Blesa Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Juan Gilabert-Estellés
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of València, València, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Muruzábal
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Antonio Cañada
- Department of Biostatistics, Health Research Institute La Fe, València, Spain
| | - Santiago Domingo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, Chara C, de Santibañes M, Sánchez Clariá R, Pekolj J, de Santibañes E. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better oncological outcomes after ALPPS for colorectal liver metastases. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01835-1. [PMID: 38647857 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01835-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
ALPPS enables complete tumor resection in a shorter interval and a larger number of patients than classic two-stage hepatectomies. However, there is little evidence regarding long-term outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). This study aims to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of ALPPS in patients with CRM. Single-cohort, prospective, observational study. Patients with unresectable CLM due to insufficient liver remnant who underwent ALPPS between June 2011 and June 2021 were included. Of 32 patients treated, 21 were male (66%) and the median age was 56 years (range = 29-81). Both stages were completed in 30 patients (93.7%), with an R0 rate of 75% (24/32). Major morbidity was 37.5% and the mortality nil. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 28.1 and 8.8 months, respectively. The 1-3, and 5-year OS was 86%, 45%, and 21%, and RFS was 42%, 14%, and 14%, respectively. The only independent risk factor associated with poor RFS (5.7 vs 11.6 months; p = 0.038) and OS (15 vs 37 months; p = 0.009) was not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. KRAS mutation was associated with worse OS from disease diagnosis (24.3 vs. 38.9 months; p = 0.025). ALPPS is associated with favorable oncological outcomes, comparable to traditional strategies to increase resectability in patients with CLM and high tumor burden. Our results suggest for the first time that adjuvant chemotherapy is independently associated with better short- and long-term outcomes after ALPPS. Selection of patients with KRAS mutations should be performed with caution, as this could affect oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando A Alvarez
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Victoria Ardiles
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Camila Chara
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martin de Santibañes
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo Sánchez Clariá
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan Pekolj
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduardo de Santibañes
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ditonno F, Bianchi A, Malandra S, Porcaro AB, Fantinel E, Negrelli R, Ferro M, Milella M, Brunelli M, Autorino R, Cerruto MA, Veccia A, Antonelli A. PARP Inhibitors in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Existing Evidence. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:402-412.e17. [PMID: 38281877 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) represent an option in selected cases of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of approved (Olaparib, Rucaparib) and investigational (Talazoparib, Niraparib, Veliparib) PARPi in mCRPC patients. Three databases were queried for studies analyzing oncological outcomes and adverse events of mCRPC patients receiving PARPi. Primary outcome was a PSA decline ≥ 50% from baseline. Secondary outcomes were objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), radiological PFS, overall survival (OS), conversion of circulating tumor cell count, and time to PSA progression. The number and rate of any grade adverse events (AEs), grade ≥ 3 AEs, and most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were registered. A subanalysis of outcomes per mutation type, prospective trials, and studies adopting combination therapies was performed. Overall, 31 studies were included in this systematic review, 28 of which are available for meta-analysis. The most frequently investigated drug was Olaparib. The most frequent mutation was BRCA2. A PSA decline rate of 43% (95% CI 0.32-0.54) was observed in the overall population. Mean OS was 15.9 (95% CI 12.9-19.0) months. In BRCA2 patients, PSA decline rate was 66% (95% CI 0.57-0.7) and OS 23.4 months (95% CI 22.8-24.1). Half of the patients suffered from grade 3 and 4 AEs (0.50 [95% CI 0.39-0.60]). Most common AEs were hematological, the most frequent being anemia (21.5%). PARP inhibitors represent a viable option for mCRPC patients. Current evidence suggests an increased effectiveness in homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutation carriers, especially BRCA2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, Verona, Italy; Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sarah Malandra
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Ginecology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuela Fantinel
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Negrelli
- Department of Radiology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Milella
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Italy
| | | | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gu L, Peng C, Li H, Jia T, Chen X, Wang H, Du S, Tang L, Liang Q, Wang B, Ma X, Zhang X. Neoadjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 196:104316. [PMID: 38432444 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy, feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus (RCC-TT) in terms of response, perioperative and oncological outcomes, and compare the results between neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant groups. Overall, 29 single-arm studies and 5 cohort studies were included. Of the 204 patients undergoing NAT, 16.2% were level I, 35.3% level II, 24.0% level III and 18.6% level IV thrombus. Most of patients underwent preoperative targeted therapy, immunotherapy-based combination therapy was applied in 5.4% patients. The total reduction rate of thrombus level was 29.4%. NAT is associated with a shorter operative time, less blood loss (p<0.05 for both). Rate of complications and oncological outcomes were similar between two groups. Overall, 32.1% (34/106) ≥ grade 3 adverse events occurred in patients undergoing NAT. Neoadjuvant therapy is safe and feasible with acceptable perioperative outcomes in RCC-TT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangyou Gu
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng Peng
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Huaikang Li
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tongyu Jia
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xinran Chen
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hanfeng Wang
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Songliang Du
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Tang
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qiyang Liang
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Baojun Wang
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Ma
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shadmanov N, Aliyev V, Piozzi GN, Bakır B, Goksel S, Asoglu O. Perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a retrospective study of 672 patients. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:144. [PMID: 38554211 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01922-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
Although there's growing information about the long-term oncological effects of robotic surgery for rectal cancer, the procedure is still relatively new. This study aimed to assess the long-term oncological results of total mesorectal excision (TME) performed laparoscopically versus robotically in the setting of rectal cancer. Restrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. A total of 489 laparoscopic (L-TME) and 183 robotic total mesorectal excisions (R-TME) were carried out by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2023. The groups were compared in terms of perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes. In the R-TME and L-TME groups, male sex predominated (75.4% and 57.3%, respectively), although the robotic group was significantly greater (p = 0.008). There was no conversion in R-TME group, whereas three (0.6%) converted to open surgery in L-TME group. The R-TME group had a statistically significant higher number of distal rectal tumors (85%) compared to the L-TME group (54.6%). Only three (1.7%) patients in the R-TME group received abdomineperineal resection (APR); in contrast, 25 (5%) patients in the L-TME group received APR (p < 0.001). For R-TME, the mean follow-up was 70.7 months (range 18-138) and for L-TME, it was 60 months (range 14-140). Frequency of completed mesorectum was significantly greater in R-TME group (98.9% vs 94.2%, p < 0.001). The 5 year overall survival rates for R-TME and L-TME groups were 89.6% and 88.7%, respectively. The 5 year disease-free survival for R-TME and L-TME groups were 84.1% and 81.1%, respectively. The local recurrences rates were 7.6% and 6.3%, respectively in R-TME and L-TME groups (p = 0.274). R-TME is characterized by no conversion and improved mesorectal integrity. R-TME had longer operation time. The long-term oncological outcomes were comparable between groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vusal Aliyev
- Bogazici Academy for Clinical Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of General Surgery, Bagcılar Medilife Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Barıs Bakır
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Suha Goksel
- Department of Pathology, Maslak Acibadem Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Oktar Asoglu
- Bogazici Academy for Clinical Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Long Depaquit T, Campagna J, Bastide C, Baboudjian M, Corral R, Uleri A, Toledano H. Salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (S-HIFU) for recurrence after primary radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Fr J Urol 2024; 34:102633. [PMID: 38547931 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate functional and oncological outcomes of salvage high-intensity focal ultrasound (S-HIFU) after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) failure in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS This single-center study included patients who underwent S-HIFU for local recurrence after EBRT between 2006 and 2023. Cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival and progression-free survival were illustrated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Disease progression was defined by one of the following criteria: increase of 2ng/mL or more above the PSA nadir, positive post-S-HIFU biopsy or initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors of disease progression after S-HIFU. RESULTS A total of 52 S-HIFU sessions for 48 patients were performed. Median time between EBRT and S-HIFU was 6.5 years. Median PSA before S-HIFU was 3.2ng/mL and median PSA nadir after S-HIFU was 0.58ng/mL. A total of 39 (81.3%) complications was recorded, including 3 (6.3%) high grade complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. After a median follow-up period of 6 years, 14 (29.2%) patients developed metastatic disease. Eighteen (37.5%) patients had no recurrence, whereas 30 (62.5%) patients received ADT for disease progression. The estimated 5-yr cancer-specific survival (CSS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and progression-free survival rates (PFSR) were 100%, 79.9% (95% CI 67-92) and 41.2% (95% CI 74-96), respectively. The estimated 10-yr CSS, MFS and PFSR were 80% (95% CI 45-100), 50.7% (95% CI 19.4-82.1) and 14% (95% CI 10.8-45), respectively. The hazard of progression increased with the intermediate (HR 3.8; 95% CI 0.99 to 15; p=0.049) and high pre-EBRT d'Amico-s risk group (HR 4.1; 95% CI 0.98 to 16.2; p=0.050). Also, the time between EBRT and S-HIFU was significantly associated with risk of progression (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.86; p=0.004). No significant difference linked to the disease progression (DP) risk was found between focal vs whole-gland treatment (p=0.70). CONCLUSION Physicians should consider HIFU as a local salvage treatment after failed EBRT, thus avoiding or delaying palliative androgen deprivation therapy. Further studies are needed to improve patient selection for this therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thibaut Long Depaquit
- Department of Urology, HIA Sainte-Anne, Toulon, France; Department of Urology, North Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
| | | | - Cyrille Bastide
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | | | - Renaud Corral
- Department of Urology, HIA Sainte-Anne, Toulon, France; Department of Urology, North Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France; Department of Urology, Martigues Hospital, Martigues, France
| | | | - Harry Toledano
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France; Department of Urology, Martigues Hospital, Martigues, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fujita N, Hatakeyama S, Tabata R, Okita K, Kido K, Hamano I, Tanaka T, Noro D, Tokui N, Suzuki Y, Yoneyama T, Hashimoto Y, Sato S, Ohyama C. Real-world effects of novel androgen receptor axis-targeted agents on oncological outcomes in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective study. Prostate Int 2024; 12:46-51. [PMID: 38523900 PMCID: PMC10960088 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The benefits of novel androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARATs) on oncological outcomes in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in real-world settings are unclear. Methods This multi-institutional retrospective study included 178 patients with nmCRPC treated between September 2003 and August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: those who were treated with any novel ARATs, including apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide, and abiraterone acetate, during any line of nmCRPC treatment (novel ARATs group) and those who were not (control group). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of novel ARATs on metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Results The median age and follow-up period after nmCRPC diagnosis were 76 years and 37 months, respectively. Of the 178 patients, 122 (69%) were treated with novel ARATs after nmCRPC diagnosis. The MFS and OS in the novel ARATs group were significantly longer than those in the control group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.020, respectively). In multivariable analyses, a prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) of <3 months and novel ARATs were independently and significantly associated with MFS and OS. The effects of novel ARATs on MFS were consistently observed across subgroups stratified by age (<75 years or ≥75 years), history of radical treatment (no or yes), biopsy Gleason score (<9 or ≥9), clinical stage (≤cT3 and cN0, or cT4 or cN1), and PSADT (≥3 months or <3 months). Conclusion Novel ARATs were significantly associated with improved oncological outcomes in patients with nmCRPC in a real-world setting, regardless of tumor aggressiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Fujita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Ryuji Tabata
- Department of Urology, Sano Kosei General Hospital, Sano, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Okita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Koichi Kido
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Itsuto Hamano
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Daisuke Noro
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Noriko Tokui
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Satoshi Sato
- Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dong B, Zhan H, Luan T, Wang J. The role and controversy of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment: a focused review. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:68. [PMID: 38403658 PMCID: PMC10895790 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03344-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is commonly performed alongside radical prostatectomy. Its primary objective is to determine the lymphatic staging of prostate tumors by removing lymph nodes involved in lymphatic drainage. This aids in guiding subsequent treatment and removing metastatic foci, potentially offering significant therapeutic benefits. Despite varying recommendations from clinical practice guidelines across countries, the actual implementation of PLND is inconsistent, partly due to debates over its therapeutic value. While high-quality evidence supporting the superiority of PLND in oncological outcomes is lacking, its role in increasing surgical time and risk of complications is well-recognized. Despite these concerns, PLND remains the gold standard for lymph node staging in prostate cancer, providing invaluable staging information unattainable by other techniques. This article reviews PLND's scope, guideline perspectives, implementation status, oncologic and non-oncologic outcomes, alternatives, and future research needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baonan Dong
- Urology Surgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| | - Hui Zhan
- Urology Surgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China.
| | - Ting Luan
- Urology Surgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| | - Jiansong Wang
- Urology Surgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 243 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650101, Yunnan, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Siu A, Steffens D, Ansari N, Karunaratne S, Solanki H, Ahmadi N, Solomon M, Moran B, Koh C. Evaluating geographical disparities on clinical outcomes following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:35. [PMID: 38376623 PMCID: PMC10879398 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02911-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rural Australians typically encounter disparities in healthcare access leading to adverse health outcomes, delayed diagnosis and reduced quality of life (QoL) parameters. These disparities may be exacerbated in advanced malignancies, where treatment is only available at highly specialised centres with appropriate multidisciplinary expertise. Thus, this study aims to determine the association between patient residence on oncological, surgical and QoL outcomes following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital from January 2017 to March 2022. On the basis of their postcode of residence, patients were stratified into metropolitan and regional groups. Data encompassing demographics, oncological, surgical and QoL outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis included chi-square test, t-tests and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS Among the 317 patients, 228 (72%) were categorised as metropolitan and 89 (28%) as regional. Metropolitan patients presented higher rates of recurrence (61.8% versus 40.0%, p = 0.014) and shorter overall mean survival [3.8 years (95% CI: 3.44-4.09) versus 4.2 years (95% CI: 3.76-4.63), p = 0.019] compared with regional patients. No other statistically significant differences were observed in oncological, surgical and QoL outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Most oncological, surgical and QoL parameters did not differ by geographical location of patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal malignancies at a high-volume quaternary referral centre. Observed differences in recurrence and survival may be attributed to the selective nature of surgical referrals and variable follow-up patterns. Future research should focus on characterising referral pathways and its influence on post-operative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Siu
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, C/O Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M 157, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, C/O Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M 157, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nabila Ansari
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, C/O Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M 157, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sascha Karunaratne
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, C/O Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M 157, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Henna Solanki
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, C/O Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M 157, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Nima Ahmadi
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, C/O Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M 157, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Solomon
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, C/O Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M 157, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brendan Moran
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, North Hampshire Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Cherry Koh
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, C/O Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M 157, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ezanno AC, Chkair S, Quesada JL, Abba J, Malgras B, Trilling B, Sage PY, Bouvet S, Foote A, Aime A, Glehen O, Pocard M, Arvieux C, Tidadini F. Oncological outcomes and hospitalization cost of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) open and closed abdomen techniques: Results from two French expert centers. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:107931. [PMID: 38181533 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) associated with CC0 excision is performed using either an open (OPEN_HIPEC) or closed abdominal technique (CLOSED_HIPEC). However, little data is available on the costs of this treatment, as there is no code for HIPEC in the French Classification of Medical Acts. Oncological outcomes and the mean cost of hospitalization were compared. METHODS Between 2017 and 2021, 144 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (all etiologies) were included (OPEN_HIPEC, n = 70; CLOSED_HIPEC, n = 74) in this retrospective two-center study. Morbi-mortality, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free-survival (RFS) and mean cost of hospitalization were compared. RESULTS The median OS and RFS were 71.3 months [63-71.5] and 26.8 months [20-35.3] respectively, and were similar for both techniques; and after stratification by histology. Multivariate analysis adjusted on PCI score of OS identified mitomycin as a protective factor (HR = 0.31 [0.10-0.90], p = 0.032) and ASA score>2 (HR = 2.32 [1.32- 4.06], p = 0.003) and number of resection (HR = 1.21 [1.06-1.39], p = 0.006) as a risk factors of RFS. Complication rates at day 30 were similar between OPEN and CLOSED_HIPEC, 31 (44.3 %) vs 42 (56.8 %); p = 0.135. OPEN_HIPEC had more severe complications (11 (35.5 %) vs 6 (14.3 %); p = 0.034). The mean cost of hospitalization was estimated as €15,627 for OPEN_HIPEC and €14,211 for CLOSED_HIPEC for a mean length-of-stay of 12.7 and 16.7 days respectively. The mean amount received by the hospital per hospitalization was estimated at €16,399 and €15,536 respectively. CONCLUSIONS OS and RFS were similar for open and closed HIPEC. Severe complications at day 30 were more frequent in OPEN_HIPEC group. The amount received by hospital for both HIPEC techniques is sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Cécile Ezanno
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France.
| | - Sihame Chkair
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), CHU Nîmes, Univ Montpellier, Nîmes, France; IDESP, UMR-INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Louis Quesada
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, INSERM CIC1406, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Julio Abba
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Brice Malgras
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France; French Military Health Service Academy, Ecole du Val de Grâce, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Trilling
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Department of digestive Surgery, Grenoble INP, TIMC, 38000, Grenoble, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Sage
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Sophie Bouvet
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), CHU Nîmes, Univ Montpellier, Nîmes, France
| | - Alison Foote
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Adeline Aime
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Lyon Center for Innovation in Cancer, EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Marc Pocard
- Department of Digestive Surgery, La Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France, INSERM, U965 CART Unit, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Arvieux
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France; Lyon Center for Innovation in Cancer, EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Fatah Tidadini
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France; Lyon Center for Innovation in Cancer, EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bakhtiar N, Nasir IUI, Shah MF, Ihtisham-Ulah, Shakeel O, Khattak S, Syed AA. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: The myth of reinventing the wheel. Pak J Med Sci 2024; 40:150-155. [PMID: 38196447 PMCID: PMC10772428 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.1.7619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & Objective To review oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (LAP-ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.In locally advanced low rectal cancer, ELAPE which is en-bloc resection of levator muscles along with the tumor in a prone position has significantly decreased the rate of having either positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) or tumor perforation. The aim of the study was to determine the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (LAP-ELAPE) for low rectal cancer. Methods This retrospective study was performed at Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital and Research Centre Lahore. Patients who underwent ELAPE for low rectal and anal cancer from January 2014 to December 2019 were selected. Data was collected using an electronic database through a hospital information system. Results A total of 82 patients were included in the study having a median age of 39 years. Clinically preoperative tumor sizes were T2:2, T3:65, T4:15. Neo-adjuvant chemo radiotherapy was administered to 79 (96.3%) patients. Pathologically tumor sizes were T0:12, T2:15, T3:50, T4:5 with 79.2% (n=65) R0 resections. The mean operative time was 340.36±64.51 minutes and the mean blood loss was 99 milliliters. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.58±4.64 days. Seventeen (20.7%) cases had pathological circumferential resection margins positive (pCRM<1mm). However, tumor perforation was found in 8(9.8%) patients. Ninety days mortality was none while 36 patients experienced recurrence (local: 23, distant: 30, local + distant 17). The median survival time was 53.00±2.69 months. Conclusion For locally advanced low rectal cancer, ELAPE has evolved as a safe oncological procedure with acceptable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nighat Bakhtiar
- Nighat Bakhtiar Senior Instructor Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, And Research Centre (SKMCH&RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Irfan-ul-Islam Nasir
- Irfan-ul-Islam Nasir Consultant Colorectal Surgeon, Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, And Research Centre (SKMCH&RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Fahd Shah
- Muhammad Fahd Shah Consultant Colorectal Surgeon, Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, And Research Centre (SKMCH&RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Ihtisham-Ulah
- Ihtisham-Ulah Fellow Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, And Research Centre (SKMCH&RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Osama Shakeel
- Osama Shakeel, Resident General Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, And Research Centre (SKMCH&RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Shahid Khattak
- Shahid Khattak Consultant Surgical Oncologist, Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, And Research Centre (SKMCH&RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Aamir Ali Syed
- Aamir Ali Syed Consultant Surgical Oncologist, Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, And Research Centre (SKMCH&RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bandelier Q, Bastide C, Charvet AL, Leclercq L, Gondran-Tellier B, Campagna J, Long-Depaquit T, Daniel L, Rossi D, Lechevallier E, Baboudjian M. Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A single-center experience. Fr J Urol 2024; 34:102537. [PMID: 37783635 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the long-term oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) in selected patients with favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS A retrospective database review of two academic centers was conducted to identify favorable IR PCa patients initially managed by AS between 2014 and 2022. Favorable IR PCa was defined by the presence of one single element of IR disease (i.e., PSA 10-20ng/mL, Gleason Grade Group [GG] 2, or cT2b). All patients were diagnosed and followed up according to a contemporary scheme, including MRI and image-guided biopsies. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival. RESULTS A total of 57 patients met our inclusion criteria and the median follow-up was 56months. During follow-up, there were no cases of metastasis or death due to PCa, but 6 deaths due to competing causes. A total of 25 (44%) and 6 patients (11%) had definitive treatment and GG 3 reclassification during follow-up, respectively. In multivariable Cox hazard regression analysis, the risk of undergoing definitive treatment was significantly associated with PSA density>0.15 (HR: 4.82, 95% CI: 1.47 to 15; P=0.01) and PI-RADS 4-5 lesions on mpMRI (HR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.06 to 5.19; P=0.006). Interestingly, tumor burden (P=0.3) and GG (P=0.7) on biopsy were not associated with definitive treatment. CONCLUSIONS AS is a safe and valuable strategy for well-selected patients with favorable IR prostate cancer, with excellent oncological outcomes after five years' follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q Bandelier
- Department of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - C Bastide
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - A-L Charvet
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - L Leclercq
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - B Gondran-Tellier
- Department of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - J Campagna
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - T Long-Depaquit
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - L Daniel
- Department of Pathology, Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - D Rossi
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - E Lechevallier
- Department of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - M Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kwik C, El-Khoury T, Pathma-Nathan N, Toh JWT. Endoscopic and trans-anal local excision vs. radical resection in the treatment of early rectal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 39:13. [PMID: 38157077 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04584-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The management of early-stage rectal cancer in clinical practice is controversial. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare oncological and postoperative outcomes for T1T2N0M0 rectal cancers managed with local excision in comparison to conventional radical resection. METHODS A systematic review of Medline, Embase and Cochrane electronic databases was performed. Relevant studies were selected using PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes measured were 5-year local recurrence and overall survival. Secondary outcomes included rates of postoperative complication, 30-day mortality, positive margin and permanent stoma formation. RESULTS Three randomized controlled trials and 27 observational studies contributed 8570 patients for analysis. Radical resection was associated with reduced 5-year local recurrence in comparison to local excision. This was statistically significant in comparison to trans-anal local excision (odds ratio (OR) 0.23; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.30) and favourable in comparison to endoscopic techniques (OR 0.40; 95% confidence interval 0.13-1.23) although this did not reach clinical significance. Positive margin rates were lowest for radical resection. However, 30-day mortality rates, perioperative complications and permanent stoma rates all favoured local excision with no statistically significant difference between endoscopic and trans-anal techniques. CONCLUSION Radical resection of early rectal cancer is associated with the lowest 5-year local recurrence rates and the lowest rate of positive margins. However, this must be balanced with its higher 30-day mortality and complication rates as well as the increased risk of permanent stoma. The emerging potential role of neoadjuvant therapy prior to local resection, and the heterogeneity of its use, as an alternative treatment for early rectal cancer further complicates the treatment paradigm and adds to controversy in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Kwik
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
| | - Toufic El-Khoury
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Nimalan Pathma-Nathan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - James Wei Tatt Toh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Deivasigamani S, Kotamarti S, Rastinehad AR, Salas RS, de la Rosette JJMCH, Lepor H, Pinto P, Ahmed HU, Gill I, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Emberton M, Lawrentschuk N, Wysock J, Feller JF, Crouzet S, Kumar M P, Seguier D, Adams ES, Michael Z, Abreu A, Jack Tay K, Ward JF, Shinohara K, Katz AE, Villers A, Chin JL, Stricker PD, Baco E, Macek P, Ahmad AE, Chiu PKF, Crawford ED, Rogers CG, Futterer JJ, Rais-Bahrami S, Robertson CN, Hadaschik B, Marra G, Valerio M, Chong KT, Kasivisvanathan V, Tan WP, Lomas D, Walz J, Guimaraes GC, Mertziotis NI, Becher E, Finelli A, Kasraeian A, Lebastchi AH, Vora A, Rosen MA, Bakir B, Arcot R, Yee S, Netsch C, Meng X, de Reijke TM, Tan YG, Regusci S, Benjamin TGR, Olivares R, Noureldin M, Bianco FJ, Sivaraman A, Kim FJ, Given RW, Dason S, Sheetz TJ, Shoji S, Schulman A, Royce P, Shah TT, Scionti S, Salomon G, Laguna P, Tourinho-Barbosa R, Aminsharifi A, Cathelineau X, Gontero P, Stabile A, Grummet J, Ledbetter L, Graton M, Stephen Jones J, Polascik TJ. Primary Whole-gland Ablation for the Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Focal Therapy Society Best Practice Statement. Eur Urol 2023; 84:547-560. [PMID: 37419773 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Whole-gland ablation is a feasible and effective minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Previous systematic reviews supported evidence for favorable functional outcomes, but oncological outcomes were inconclusive owing to limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the real-world data on the mid- to long-term oncological and functional outcomes of whole-gland cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with clinically localized PCa, and to provide expert recommendations and commentary on these findings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library publications through February 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. As endpoints, baseline clinical characteristics, and oncological and functional outcomes were assessed. To estimate the pooled prevalence of oncological, functional, and toxicity outcomes, and to quantify and explain the heterogeneity, random-effect meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-nine studies were identified, including 14 on cryoablation and 15 on HIFU with a median follow-up of 72 mo. Most of the studies were retrospective (n = 23), with IDEAL (idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term study) stage 2b (n = 20) being most common. Biochemical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival rates at 10 yr were 58%, 96%, 63%, 71-79%, and 84%, respectively. Erectile function was preserved in 37% of cases, and overall pad-free continence was achieved in 96% of cases, with a 1-yr rate of 97.4-98.8%. The rates of stricture, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, rectourethral fistula, and sepsis were observed to be 11%, 9.5%, 8%, 0.7%, and 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The mid- to long-term real-world data, and the safety profiles of cryoablation and HIFU are sound to support and be offered as primary treatment for appropriate patients with localized PCa. When compared with other existing treatment modalities for PCa, these ablative therapies provide nearly equivalent intermediate- to long-term oncological and toxicity outcomes, as well as excellent pad-free continence rates in the primary setting. This real-world clinical evidence provides long-term oncological and functional outcomes that enhance shared decision-making when balancing risks and expected outcomes that reflect patient preferences and values. PATIENT SUMMARY Cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound are minimally invasive treatments available to selectively treat localized prostate cancer, considering their nearly comparable intermediate- to long term cancer control and preservation of urinary continence to other radical treatments in the primary setting. However, a well-informed decision should be made based on one's values and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Srinath Kotamarti
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Herbert Lepor
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Urology, Imperial College London & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Inderbir Gill
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Wysock
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Denis Seguier
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Urology, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Eric S Adams
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zoe Michael
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andre Abreu
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - John F Ward
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katsuto Shinohara
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Aaron E Katz
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnauld Villers
- Department of Urology, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Joseph L Chin
- Department of Urology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Eduard Baco
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Ardalan E Ahmad
- Department of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter K F Chiu
- Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - E David Crawford
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Craig G Rogers
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jurgen J Futterer
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cary N Robertson
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, The University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Service of Urology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Wei Phin Tan
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Derek Lomas
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Amir H Lebastchi
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anup Vora
- Chesapeake Urology, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Mark A Rosen
- Department of Urology, Sutter Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Baris Bakir
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Rohit Arcot
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Urology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Samuel Yee
- Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yu Guang Tan
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Stefano Regusci
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Swiss International Prostate Centelenor, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Ruben Olivares
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Fernando J Bianco
- Urological Research Network, Urologist Specialist Group, Miami Lakes, FL, USA
| | - Arjun Sivaraman
- Division of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Fernando J Kim
- Division of Urology, Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Shawn Dason
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Tyler J Sheetz
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sunao Shoji
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ariel Schulman
- Department of Urology, Maimonides Health Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Royce
- Division of Urology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Division of Urology, Imperial College London & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Georg Salomon
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Clinic Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Alireza Aminsharifi
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, The University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeremy Grummet
- Division of Urology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leila Ledbetter
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Margaret Graton
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Thomas J Polascik
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Calleja R, Medina-Fernández FJ, Vallejo-Lesmes A, Durán M, Torres-Tordera EM, Díaz-López CA, Briceño J. Transition from laparoscopic to robotic approach in rectal cancer: a single-center short-term analysis based on the learning curve. Updates Surg 2023; 75:2179-2189. [PMID: 37874533 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01655-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
As a novel procedure becomes more and more used, knowledge about its learning curve and its impact on outcomes is useful for future implementations. Our aim is (i) to identify the phases of the robotic rectal surgery learning process and assess the safety and oncological outcomes during that period, (ii) to compare the robotic rectal surgery learning phases outcomes with laparoscopic rectal resections performed before the implementation of the robotic surgery program. We performed a retrospective study, based on a prospectively maintained database, with methodological quality assessment by STROBE checklist. All the procedures were performed by the same two surgeons. A total of 157 robotic rectal resections from June 2018 to January 2022 and 97 laparoscopic rectal resections from January 2018 to July 2019 were included. The learning phase was completed at case 26 for surgeon A, 36 for surgeon B, and 60 for the center (both A & B). There were no differences in histopathological results or postoperative complications between phases, achieving the same ratio of mesorectal quality, circumferential and distal resection margins as the laparoscopic approach. A transitory increase of major complications and anastomotic leakage could occur once overcoming the learning phase, secondary to the progressive complexity of cases. Robotic rectal cancer surgery learning curve phases in experienced laparoscopic surgeons was completed after 25-35 cases. Implementation of a robotic rectal surgery program is safe in oncologic terms, morbidity, mortality and length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Calleja
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain.
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.
| | - Francisco Javier Medina-Fernández
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Ana Vallejo-Lesmes
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Manuel Durán
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Eva M Torres-Tordera
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - César A Díaz-López
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Javier Briceño
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n 14004, Cordoba, Spain
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yi X, Zhang X, Li Q, Ouyang J. Comparing perioperative and oncological outcomes of transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective studies. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9228-9243. [PMID: 37872424 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10495-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Meta-analysis of the results of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) and laparoscopic TME (laTME) regarding perioperative and oncological outcomes have been conducted. Due to the lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies in the included literature, the conclusions are unreliable. This study included RCTs and prospective studies for analysis to obtain more reliable conclusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Systematic searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted up to June 2023. To assess the quality, the Cochrane quality assessment tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were employed. The perioperative and oncological outcomes were then analyzed. The I2 statistic was used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses was conducted. RESULTS A total of 22 studies, comprising 5056 patients, were included in the analysis, of which 6 were RCTs and 16 were prospective studies. The conversion rate in the taTME group was significantly lower than that in the laTME group (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.22, P < 0.01), and the circumferential resection margin (CRM) was longer (MD 0.99 mm, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.32 mm, P < 0.01), with a lower rate of positive CRM involvement (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.97, P = 0.03). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, anastomotic leakage, uroschesis, obstruction, secondary operation, hospital stay, urethral injury, readmission, mortality rate within 30 days, mesorectal resection quality, number of harvested lymph nodes, distal resection margin (DRM), positive DRM, local recurrence, and distance recurrence (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION According to the findings of this meta-analysis, which is based on RCTs and prospective studies, taTME appears to have an advantage over laTME in terms of conversion rate and CRM involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianhao Yi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China
| | - Xuan Zhang
- Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China
| | - Qingchun Li
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China
| | - Jun Ouyang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Uccella S, Bosco M, Mezzetto L, Garzon S, Maggi V, Giacopuzzi S, Antonelli A, Pinali L, Zorzato PC, Festi A, Polati E, Montemezzi S, De Manzoni G, Franchi MP, Veraldi GF. Major vessel resection for complete cytoreduction in primary advanced and recurrent ovarian malignancies: A case series and systematic review of the literature - pushing the boundaries in oncovascular surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 179:42-51. [PMID: 37922861 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oncovascular surgery (the removal of major blood vessels infiltrated by cancer) is challenging but can be key to achieve complete cytoreduction in patient with advanced ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to review the literature on oncovascular surgery in ovarian cancer and to report the details of all the cases performed at our institution. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the database of ovarian cancer patients who underwent debulking surgery at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Verona University between January 2021 and 2023. Patients with at least one major vessel resection during cytoreduction were identified. We then systematically review the literature searching Pubmed and Embase from inception to January 2023 to report all cases of surgery for ovarian cancer with concomitant major vessel resection. RESULTS Five patients with advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer underwent major vascular resection at our institution. Vascular involvement was preoperatively identified in all cases and no case of vascular resection was performed after accidental injury. The major vessels removed were the inferior vena cava (n = 2), the common iliac veins (n = 2), the external iliac arteries (n = 2), the left common iliac artery (n = 1), and the left external iliac vein (n = 1). All patients underwent other non-gynecological cytoreductive procedures prior to vessel removal and had R0 obtained. Three (60%) patients experienced one or more postoperative complications. The literature search identified a total of seven cases of major vessels resection in ovarian cancer surgery. A single or multiple major vessels were removed in two (28.6%) and five (72.4%) cases, respectively. All the seven patients underwent vascular reconstruction. Four (57.1%) patients reported postoperative complications. Overall, 66.7% of the 12 total identified patients were free from disease at the last follow-up [median 15.5 months (range 5-25)]. CONCLUSIONS Oncovascular surgery is feasible in selected patients with ovarian cancer, provided that a multidisciplinary approach with customized care is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Uccella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Mariachiara Bosco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Mezzetto
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Garzon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Veronica Maggi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Giacopuzzi
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Lucia Pinali
- Radiology Department, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Pier Carlo Zorzato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Anna Festi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Enrico Polati
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care B, University of Verona, DAI Emergenza e Terapie Intensive, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni De Manzoni
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo P Franchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Gian Franco Veraldi
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barzola E, Cornejo L, Gómez N, Pigem A, Julià D, Ortega N, Delisau O, Bobb KA, Farrés R, Planellas P. Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and oncological results between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by multiple surgeon implementation: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:3013-3023. [PMID: 37924415 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01736-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is becoming increasingly common for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. However, the use and implementation of robotic surgery remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery, focusing on pathological results and disease-free survival (DFS), in our cohort with initial robotic experience by multiple surgeon implementation. This retrospective study enrolled 571 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, who were treated with chemoradiotherapy and surgery between January 2015 and December 2021. Surgical outcomes after RAS and laparoscopic surgery (LS) were compared using a propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis. After matching, 200 patients (100 in each group) were included. The median operative time was significantly longer in the RAS group than in the LS group (p < 0.001). The conversion and morbidity rates were similar between the groups. A significantly higher rate of complete mesorectal excision (92% vs. 72%; p = 0.001) and number of lymph nodes harvested (p = 0.009) was observed in the RAS group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding circumferential and distal resection margin involvement. The 3-year overall and disease-free survival rate was similar between the two groups (p = 0.849 and p = 0.582, respectively). Two patients in the LS group developed local recurrence and 27 patients (15.4%) developed metastatic disease. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor stage III was the only factor associated with disease-free survival (HR, 9.34; (95% CI 1.13-77.1), p = 0.038). RAS and LS showed similar outcomes in terms of perioperative, anatomopathological, and disease-free survival, after multiple surgeon implementations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Barzola
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - L Cornejo
- Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - N Gómez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - A Pigem
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - D Julià
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - N Ortega
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - O Delisau
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - K A Bobb
- Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies-St. Augustine, Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Mount Hope, Trinidad, West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - R Farrés
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - P Planellas
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yu CC, Chang CH, Fang JK, Huang SK, Tseng WH, Lee HY, Yeh HC, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Chen PC, Cheong IS, Hsueh TY, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Chen WC, Lo SH, Lin PH, Wang SS, Huang CY, Wu CC, Tseng JS, Wu SY, Tsai YC. Impact of pathological response on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. J Formos Med Assoc 2023; 122:1274-1281. [PMID: 37400294 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rates of pathological complete response (ypT0N0/X) and pathological response (ypT1N0/X or less) in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer who were treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and to examine their impact on oncological outcomes. METHODS This study is a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy between 2002 and 2021. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate all clinical parameters for response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to assess the effect of the response on the oncological outcomes. RESULTS A total of 84 patients with UTUC who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were identified. Among them, 44 (52.4%) patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and 22 (26.2%) patients had a carboplatin-based regimen. The pathological complete response rate was 11.6% (n = 10), and the pathological response rate was 42.9% (n = 36). Multifocal tumors or tumors larger than 3 cm significantly reduced the odds of pathological response. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, pathological response was independently associated with better overall survival (HR 0.38, p = 0.024), cancer-specific survival (HR 0.24, p = 0.033), and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.17, p = 0.001), but it was not associated with bladder recurrence-free survival (HR 0.84, p = 0.69). CONCLUSION Pathological response after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy is strongly associated with patient survival and recurrence, and it might be a good surrogate for evaluating the efficacy of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Kai Fang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Steven K Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Taiwan; Department of Medical Science Industries, College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsin Tseng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Pi-Che Chen
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chieh Chen
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hsiu Lo
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hung Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Yu Wu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gabriel PE, Pinar U, Lenfant L, Parra J, Vaessen C, Mozer P, Chartier-Kastler E, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. Perioperative, renal function and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2023; 41:3001-3007. [PMID: 37676283 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04590-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report perioperative, renal function and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS This was a retrospective single-arm monocentric study including all consecutive UTUC patients treated with robot-assisted RNU at our institution between 2014 and 2022. Descriptive statistics with median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables and numbers with frequencies for categorical variables were used to report perioperative and renal function outcomes while Kaplan-Meier curves were computed to present extravesical and intravesical recurrence-free survival(RFS) as well as cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals(CIs). RESULTS Overall, 70 patients with a median age of 69.6 [63.3-74.9] years were included in our study. With regards to perioperative outcomes, the median operative time was 157 [130-182] min with a median blood loss of 200 [100-300] cc. Intraoperative complications occurred in 4 (5.7%) patients but no conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery was required. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 (12.9%) patients, including 5 (7.1%) with grade ≥ 3 complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The median length of stay was 4 [3-6] days. With regards to renal function outcomes, the median postoperative loss in estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge was 16 [10.25-26] mL/min/1.73 m2. With regards to oncological outcomes, the 3-year extravesical and intravesical RFS, CSS and OS rates were 73.6 [62.8-86.2]%, 68.1 [54.6-85]%, 82.5 [72-94.4]% and 75.3 [63.4-89.5]%, respectively. CONCLUSION We report favorable perioperative and oncological outcomes with expected decrease in renal function after robot-assisted RNU for patients with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Etienne Gabriel
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Ugo Pinar
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Louis Lenfant
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Parra
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Vaessen
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Mozer
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ballal DS, Agrawal HM, Kazi M, Desouza A, Saklani AP. Splenic flexure cancer: is right extended hemicolectomy better than left hemicolectomy? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:402. [PMID: 37837479 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03135-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is no consensus on the optimal surgery for splenic flexure cancers. METHODS Review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with splenic flexure cancer undergoing either a right extended hemicolectomy or left hemicolectomy at a tertiary care cancer hospital from 14.5.2010 to 16.9.2021. The primary outcome measures were postoperative morbidity and hospital stay with secondary outcomes being overall survival, disease-free survival, and long-term patient reported functional and quality of life outcomes. RESULTS The demographic variables were evenly distributed between groups, and median follow-up was 44 months. The groups were comparable in terms of postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo complication ≥ 3a 10.6% vs 10%, p = 0.322) and hospital stay (8 days vs 7 days, p = 0.316). Oncological outcomes were similar in both groups (3-year disease-free survival 71.8% vs 67.8%, p = 0.877, and 3-year overall survival 83.9% vs 75.8%, p = 0.787), and long-term patient-reported functional outcomes were excellent in both groups. CONCLUSION Oncological outcomes, post operative morbidity, and long-term patient reported functional outcomes are comparable in patients undergoing either a right extended or left hemicolectomy for splenic flexure cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devesh S Ballal
- Division of Colo-Rectal and Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr E. Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Harsh Mohan Agrawal
- Division of Colo-Rectal and Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr E. Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Mufaddal Kazi
- Division of Colo-Rectal and Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr E. Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Ashwin Desouza
- Division of Colo-Rectal and Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr E. Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Avanish P Saklani
- Division of Colo-Rectal and Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr E. Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shoji S, Naruse J, Oda K, Kuroda S, Umemoto T, Nakajima N, Hasegawa M, Mukasa A, Koizumi N, Miyajima A. Current status and future outlook of ultrasound treatment for prostate cancer. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2023:10.1007/s10396-023-01368-x. [PMID: 37787881 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-023-01368-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy are the standard treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PC). However, radical prostatectomy may cause the deterioration of urinary and sexual function, and radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis and severe rectal bleeding are risk factors for fatal conditions in patients after radiation therapy. With the recent development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the localization of clinically significant PC (csPC) and treatment modalities, "focal therapy", which cures csPC while preserving anatomical structures related to urinary and sexual functions, has become a minimally invasive treatment for localized PC. Based on the clinical results of transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for localized PC in the whole gland and focal therapy, HIFU is considered an attractive treatment option for focal therapy. Recently, the short-term clinical results of transurethral high-intensity directional ultrasound (HIDU) have been reported. With the resolution of some issues, HIDU may be commonly used for PC treatment similar to HIFU. Because HIFU and HIDU have limitations regarding the treatment of patients with large prostate calcifications and large prostate volumes, the proper use of these modalities will enable the treatment of any target area in the prostate. To establish a standard treatment strategy for localized PC, pair-matched and historically controlled studies are required to verify the oncological and functional outcomes of ultrasound treatment for patients with localized PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunao Shoji
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan.
| | - Jun Naruse
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
| | - Kazuya Oda
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kuroda
- Department of Urology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Umemoto
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Nakajima
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
| | - Masanori Hasegawa
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
| | - Anju Mukasa
- Department of Mechanical and Intelligent Systems Engineering, Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Chofu, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norihiro Koizumi
- Department of Mechanical and Intelligent Systems Engineering, Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Chofu, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Miyajima
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rayman S, Sucandy I, Ross SB, Crespo K, Syblis C, Rosemurgy A. A propensity score matched analysis of robotic and open hepatectomy for treatment of liver tumors. Clinical outcomes, oncological survival, and costs comparison. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2399-2407. [PMID: 37428364 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01674-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive robotic hepatectomy is gaining popularity with a faster rate of adoption when compared to laparoscopic approach. Technical advantages brought by the robotic surgical system facilitate a transition from open to minimally invasive technique in hepatic surgery. Published matched data examining the results of robotic hepatectomy using the open approach as a benchmark are still limited. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, survival, and costs between robotic and open hepatectomy undertaken in our tertiary hepatobiliary center. With IRB approval, we prospectively followed 285 consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy for neoplastic liver diseases between 2012 and 2020. Propensity score matched comparison of robotic and open hepatectomy was conducted by 1:1 ratio. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). The matching process assigned 49 patients to each arm, open and robotic hepatectomy. There were no differences in R1 resection rates (4% vs 4%; p = 1.00). Differences in perioperative variables between open and robotic hepatectomy included postoperative complications (16% vs 2%; p = 0.02) and length of stay (LOS) [6 (7 ± 5.0) vs 4 (5 ± 4.0) days; p = 0.002]. There were no differences between open and robotic hepatectomy regarding postoperative hepatic insufficiency (10% vs 2%; p = 0.20). No difference was seen in long-term survival outcomes. While there were no differences in costs, robotic hepatectomy was associated with lower reimbursement [$20,432 (39,191 ± 41,467.81) vs $33,190 (67,860 ± 87,707.81); p = 0.04] and lower contribution margin [$-11,229 (3902 ± 42,572.43) vs $8768 (34,690 ± 89,759.56); p = 0.03]. Compared to open approach, robotic hepatectomy robotic offers lower rates of postoperative complications, shorter LOS and similar costs, while not compromising long-term oncological outcomes. Robotic hepatectomy may eventually become the preferred approach in minimally invasive treatment of liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shlomi Rayman
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
- Department of General Surgery, Assuta Ashdod Public Hospital, Ashdod, Israel
- Faculty of Health and Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheba, Israel
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
| | - Sharona B Ross
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Crespo
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Cameron Syblis
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Alexander Rosemurgy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Davey MG, Temperley HC, O'Sullivan NJ, Marcelino V, Ryan OK, Ryan ÉJ, Donlon NE, Johnston SM, Robb WB. Minimally Invasive and Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5544-5557. [PMID: 37261563 PMCID: PMC10409677 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13654-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Optimal surgical management for gastric cancer remains controversial. We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes after open gastrectomy (OG), laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG), and robotic gastrectomy (RG) for gastric cancer. METHODS A systematic search of electronic databases was undertaken. An NMA was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-NMA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using R and Shiny. RESULTS Twenty-two RCTs including 6890 patients were included. Overall, 49.6% of patients underwent LAG (3420/6890), 46.6% underwent OG (3212/6890), and 3.7% underwent RG (258/6890). At NMA, there was a no significant difference in recurrence rates following LAG (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.49) compared with OG. Similarly, overall survival (OS) outcomes were identical following OG and LAG (OS: OG, 87.0% [1652/1898] vs. LAG: OG, 87.0% [1650/1896]), with no differences in OS in meta-analysis (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.77-1.52). Importantly, patients undergoing LAG experienced reduced intraoperative blood loss, surgical incisions, distance from proximal margins, postoperative hospital stays, and morbidity post-resection. CONCLUSIONS LAG was associated with non-inferior oncological and surgical outcomes compared with OG. Surgical outcomes following LAG and RG superseded OG, with similar outcomes observed for both LAG and RG. Given these findings, minimally invasive approaches should be considered for the resection of local gastric cancer, once surgeon and institutional expertise allows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Davey
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland.
| | - Hugo C Temperley
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Niall J O'Sullivan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Vianka Marcelino
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Odhrán K Ryan
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Éanna J Ryan
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Co Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Sean M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Midlands University Hospital, Tullamore, Co. Offaly, Republic of Ireland
| | - William B Robb
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Co Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Alhassan NS, AlShammari SA, AlRabah RN, AlZahrani AM, Abdulla MH, Traiki TAB, Zubaidi AM, Al-Obeed OA, Alkhayal KA. 5-year oncological outcomes in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: stent as bridge to surgery. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:262. [PMID: 37525096 PMCID: PMC10391764 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02903-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A considerable number of patients with colon cancer present with a colonic obstruction. The use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery (BTS) in potential curative patients with left-sided colonic cancer obstruction remains debatable. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the 5-year oncological outcomes of using a SEMS as a BTS. METHODS All patients with left-sided malignant colon obstruction who underwent curative surgery with no metastasis upon presentation between March 2009 and May 2013 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 45 patients were included, 28 patients underwent upfront surgery, and 17 patients had a stent as a bridge to surgery. T4 stage was statistically significantly higher in patients who had a SEMS as a BTS (35.3% vs. 10.7%) (p-value 0.043). The mean duration in days of the SEMS to surgery was 13.76 (SD 10.08). TNM stage 3 was a prognostic factor toward distant metastasis (HR 5.05). When comparing patients who had upfront surgery to those who had a SEMS as a BTS, higher 5-year disease-free survival (75% vs. 72%) and 5-year overall survival (89% vs. 82%) were seen in patients who had upfront surgery. However, both were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION Using self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery yields comparable 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates to upfront emergency surgery. The decision to use SEMS versus opting for emergency surgery should be made after careful patient selection and with the assistance of experienced endoscopists. TRIAL REGISTRATION N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noura S Alhassan
- Colorectal Research Chair, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sulaiman A AlShammari
- Colorectal Research Chair, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Razan N AlRabah
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | | | - Maha-Hamadien Abdulla
- Colorectal Research Chair, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Thamer A Bin Traiki
- Colorectal Research Chair, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmad M Zubaidi
- Colorectal Research Chair, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Omar A Al-Obeed
- Colorectal Research Chair, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khayal A Alkhayal
- Colorectal Research Chair, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abe T, Matsuda T, Sawada R, Hasegawa H, Yamashita K, Kato T, Harada H, Urakawa N, Goto H, Kanaji S, Oshikiri T, Kakeji Y. Patients younger than 40 years with colorectal cancer have a similar prognosis to older patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:191. [PMID: 37430167 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04488-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In recent years, the proportion of patients diagnosed with CRC at younger ages has increased. The clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes in younger patients with CRC remain controversial. We aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes in younger patients with CRC. METHODS We examined 980 patients who underwent surgery for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2020. Patients were divided into two cohorts: younger (< 40 years old) and older (≥ 40 years old). RESULTS Of the 980 patients, 26 (2.7%) were under the age of 40 years. The younger group had more advanced disease (57.7% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.031) and more cases beyond the transverse colon (84.6% vs. 65.3%, p = 0.029) than the older group. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered more frequently in the younger group (50% vs. 25.8%, p < 0.01). Relapse-free survival and overall survival were similar between the groups at all stages. Moreover, in stages II and III they were also comparable, regardless of the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Younger patients with CRC have a prognosis equivalent to that of older patients. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment strategies for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoki Abe
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Takeru Matsuda
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
| | - Ryuichiro Sawada
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Hasegawa
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Yamashita
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Takashi Kato
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Harada
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Naoki Urakawa
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Hironobu Goto
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Shingo Kanaji
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Taro Oshikiri
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Perera M, Jibara G, Tin AL, Haywood S, Sjoberg DD, Benfante NE, Carlsson SV, Eastham JA, Laudone V, Touijer KA, Fine S, Scardino PT, Vickers AJ, Ehdaie B. Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:662-668. [PMID: 36566100 PMCID: PMC10285029 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) is recommended as the preferred treatment for men with low-risk disease. In order to optimize risk stratification and exclude undiagnosed higher-grade disease, most AS protocols recommend a confirmatory biopsy. OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare outcomes among men with grade group (GG) 2/3 prostate cancer on initial biopsy with those among men whose disease was initially GG1 but was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We reviewed patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in two cohorts: "immediate RP group," with GG2/3 cancer on diagnostic biopsy, and "AS group," with GG1 cancer on initial biopsy that was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Probabilities of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and salvage therapy were determined using multivariable Cox regression models with risk adjustment. Risks of adverse pathology at RP were also compared using logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The immediate RP group comprised 4009 patients and the AS group comprised 321 patients. The AS group had lower adjusted rates of adverse pathology (27% vs 35%, p = 0.003). BCR rates were lower in the AS group, although this did not reach conventional significance (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.06, p = 0.10) compared with the immediate RP group. Risk-adjusted 1- and 5-yr BCR rates were 4.6% (95% CI 3.0-6.5%) and 10.4% (95% CI 6.9-14%), respectively, for the AS group compared with 6.3% (95% CI 5.6-7.0%) and 20% (95% CI 19-22%), respectively, in the immediate RP group. A nonsignificant association was observed for salvage treatment-free survival favoring the AS group (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42, 1.06, p = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS We found that men with GG1 cancer who were upgraded on confirmatory biopsy tend to have less aggressive disease than men with the same grade found at initial biopsy. These results must be confirmed in larger series before recommendations can be made regarding a more conservative approach in men with upgraded pathology on surveillance biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY We studied men with low-risk prostate cancer who were initially eligible for active surveillance but presented with more aggressive cancer on confirmatory biopsy. We found that outcomes for these men were better than the outcomes for those diagnosed initially with more serious cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon Perera
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ghalib Jibara
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel Haywood
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel D Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole E Benfante
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - James A Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vincent Laudone
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim A Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samson Fine
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter T Scardino
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tidadini F, Abba J, Quesada JL, Trilling B, Bonne A, Foote A, Faucheron JL, Arvieux C. Oncological Outcomes After Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:632-641. [PMID: 35778645 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00843-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new surgical technique for the treatment of initially unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Our objective was to assess its oncological outcomes. METHODS Between July 2016 and September 2020, data from 100 PIPAC procedures with oxaliplatin or doxorubicin-cisplatin in 49 patients with PC (all etiologies) were analyzed. We studied the evolution of the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), the need for radical surgery (R0), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The patients' median age was 65 (59; 71) years, and 55.1% were women. Median PIPAC procedures per patient were 2 (1-3), and 28 (57.1%) underwent more than one PIPAC procedure. Median PCI at the first PIPAC was 19 (15-22). PCI decreased for 37%, remained stable for 29.6%, and increased for 33.4% patients. Four (8.3%) underwent radical R0 surgery after PIPAC. After a median follow-up of 16.1 months (1.5-90.1), the median overall survival from PC diagnosis was 29.1 months (14.8-34.3), with a median gastric and colorectal PC survival of 11.3 (7.2-34.3) and 29.1 months (16.1-31) respectively. Overall survival after the first PIPAC session was 11.6 months (6-17.3), with median survival after gastric and colorectal PCs being 6 (2.9-15.5) and 13.3 months (5-17.6), respectively. Stratification of patients according to the number of lines of systemic chemotherapy, PIPAC procedures, and the chronology of PC onset did not result in a significant difference in survival. CONCLUSION The OS was in line with the literature. PIPAC could delay oncological progression and improve survival. These encouraging results justify the ongoing and future evaluations of PIPAC by prospective randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatah Tidadini
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10232, 38043, 38043, CEDEX 09, Grenoble, France
- Lyon Center for Innovation in Cancer, EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Julio Abba
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10232, 38043, 38043, CEDEX 09, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Louis Quesada
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, INSERM CIC1406, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Bertrand Trilling
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10232, 38043, 38043, CEDEX 09, Grenoble, France
- UMR 5525, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG, University Grenoble Alps, Grenoble, France
| | - Aline Bonne
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10232, 38043, 38043, CEDEX 09, Grenoble, France
| | - Alison Foote
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10232, 38043, 38043, CEDEX 09, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Luc Faucheron
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10232, 38043, 38043, CEDEX 09, Grenoble, France
- UMR 5525, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG, University Grenoble Alps, Grenoble, France
| | - Catherine Arvieux
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10232, 38043, 38043, CEDEX 09, Grenoble, France.
- Lyon Center for Innovation in Cancer, EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Davey MG, Ryan ÉJ, Donlon NE, Ryan OK, Al Azzawi M, Boland MR, Kerin MJ, Lowery AJ. Comparing surgical outcomes of approaches to adrenalectomy - a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:180. [PMID: 37145303 PMCID: PMC10163131 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02911-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have simultaneously compared the safety of open (OA), transperitoneal laparoscopic (TLA), posterior retroperitoneal (PRA), and robotic adrenalectomy (RA) for resecting adrenal tumours. AIM To evaluate outcomes for OA, TLA, PRA, and RA from RCTs. METHODS A NMA was performed according to PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Analysis was performed using R packages and Shiny. RESULTS Eight RCTs with 488 patients were included (mean age: 48.9 years). Overall, 44.5% of patients underwent TLA (217/488), 37.3% underwent PRA (182/488), 16.4% underwent RA (80/488), and just 1.8% patients underwent OA (9/488). The mean tumour size was 35 mm in largest diameter with mean sizes of 44.3 mm for RA, 40.9 mm for OA, 35.5 mm for TLA, and 34.4 mm for PRA (P < 0.001). TLA had the lowest blood loss (mean: 50.6 ml), complication rates (12.4%, 14/113), and conversion to open rates (1.3%, 2/157), while PRA had the shortest intra-operative duration (mean: 94 min), length of hospital stay (mean: 3.7 days), lowest visual analogue scale pain scores post-operatively (mean: 3.7), and was most cost-effective (mean: 1728 euros per case). At NMA, there was a significant increase in blood loss for OA (mean difference (MD): 117.00 ml (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.41-230.00)) with similar blood loss observed for PRA (MD: - 10.50 (95% CI: - 83.40-65.90)) compared to TLA. CONCLUSION LTA and PRA are important contemporary options in achieving favourable outcomes following adrenalectomy. The next generation of RCTs may be more insightful for comparison surgical outcomes following RA, as this approach is likely to play a future role in minimally invasive adrenalectomy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42022301005.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Davey
- Discipline of Surgery, The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91YR71, Ireland.
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, H91YR71, Republic of Ireland.
| | - Éanna J Ryan
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Odhrán K Ryan
- Surgical Professorial Unit, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, D04 T6F4, Ireland
| | - Mohammed Al Azzawi
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Michael R Boland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Michael J Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91YR71, Ireland
| | - Aoife J Lowery
- Discipline of Surgery, The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91YR71, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Faulk A, Avulova S, Bree KK, Baak-Kukreja J, Westerman ME. Pelvic Organ Preservation in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Less Is More. Eur Urol Focus 2023:S2405-4569(23)00103-7. [PMID: 37142535 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Radical cystectomy (RC) is a treatment option for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) but is associated with high morbidity and a negative impact on quality of life. Reproductive or pelvic organ-sparing cystectomy (ROSC) techniques have emerged as a potential strategy to mitigate some potential effects of standard RC. Here we discuss current knowledge regarding oncological, functional, and sexual function outcomes associated with ROSC and their applicability in NMIBC. These outcomes can be used to make informed clinical decisions regarding cystectomy technique in appropriately staged and selected patients with NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed results for bladder cancer control, urinary function, and sexual function after removal of the bladder with and without techniques to spare reproductive or pelvic organs. We found evidence of better sexual function outcomes with a sparing approach without compromise of cancer control. Further studies are needed to assess urinary function and pelvic floor-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Faulk
- School of Medicine, LSU Health Science Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | - Kelly K Bree
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Mary E Westerman
- Department of Urology, LSU Health Science Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA; Department of Surgery, East Jefferson General Hospital, Metairie, LA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Davey MG, Kerin EP, McLaughlin RP, Barry MK, Malone CM, Elwahab SA, Lowery AJ, Kerin MJ. Evaluating the Necessity for Routine Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Postmenopausal Patients Being Treated for Clinically Node Negative Breast Cancer the Era of RxPONDER. Clin Breast Cancer 2023:S1526-8209(23)00080-0. [PMID: 37076364 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Traditionally, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was performed to inform adjuvant chemotherapy prescription and prognosis in breast cancer. Following RxPONDER, the OncotypeDX Recurrence Score (RS) guides adjuvant chemotherapy prescription for all postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive lymph nodes (0-3 + LN). AIMS To establish the oncological safety of omitting SLNB in postmenopausal patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer indicated to undergo SLNB and to evaluate the primary determinants of chemotherapy prescription for these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was undertaken. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. Data analytics was performed using SPSS v26.0. RESULTS Five hundred and seventy five consecutive patients were included (mean age: 66.5 years, range: 45-96). The median follow-up was 97.2 months (range: 3.0-181.6). Of the 575 patients, just 12 patients had positive SLNB (SLNB+) (2.1%). Using Kaplan-Meier analyses, SLNB+ failed to impact recurrence (P = .766) or mortality (P = .310). However, using Cox regression analyses, SLNB+ independently predicted poorer disease-free survival (hazard ratio: 1.001, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.000-1.001, P = .029). Logistic regression analysis identified RS as the sole predictor of chemotherapy prescription (odds ratio: 1.171, 95% CI: 1.097-1.250, P < .001). CONCLUSION Omitting SLNB may be safe and justifiable in postmenopausal patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer with clinically negative axillae. Following RxPONDER, RS is the most important guide of chemotherapy use in these patients and SLNB may be less important than previously perceived. Prospective, randomized clinical trials are required to fully establish the oncological safety of omitting SLNB in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Davey
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Eoin P Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ray P McLaughlin
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Michael K Barry
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Carmel M Malone
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Sami Abd Elwahab
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Aoife J Lowery
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Michael J Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Baboudjian M, Breda A, Roumeguère T, Uleri A, Roche JB, Touzani A, Lacetera V, Beauval JB, Diamand R, Simone G, Windisch O, Benamran D, Fourcade A, Fiard G, Durand-Labrunie C, Roumiguié M, Sanguedolce F, Oderda M, Barret E, Fromont G, Dariane C, Charvet AL, Gondran-Tellier B, Bastide C, Lechevallier E, Palou J, Ruffion A, Van Der Bergh RCN, Peltier A, Ploussard G. Expanding inclusion criteria for active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a machine learning approach. World J Urol 2023; 41:1301-1308. [PMID: 36920491 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04353-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop new selection criteria for active surveillance (AS) in intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS Retrospective study including patients from 14 referral centers who underwent pre-biopsy mpMRI, image-guided biopsies and radical prostatectomy. The cohort included biopsy-naive IR PCa patients who met the following inclusion criteria: Gleason Grade Group (GGG) 1-2, PSA < 20 ng/mL, and cT1-cT2 tumors. We relied on a recursive machine learning partitioning algorithm developed to predict adverse pathological features (i.e., ≥ pT3a and/or pN + and/or GGG ≥ 3). RESULTS A total of 594 patients with IR PCa were included, of whom 220 (37%) had adverse features. PI-RADS score (weight:0.726), PSA density (weight:0.158), and clinical T stage (weight:0.116) were selected as the most informative risk factors to classify patients according to their risk of adverse features, leading to the creation of five risk clusters. The adverse feature rates for cluster #1 (PI-RADS ≤ 3 and PSA density < 0.15), cluster #2 (PI-RADS 4 and PSA density < 0.15), cluster #3 (PI-RADS 1-4 and PSA density ≥ 0.15), cluster #4 (normal DRE and PI-RADS 5), and cluster #5 (abnormal DRE and PI-RADS 5) were 11.8, 27.9, 37.3, 42.7, and 65.1%, respectively. Compared with the current inclusion criteria, extending the AS criteria to clusters #1 + #2 or #1 + #2 + #3 would increase the number of eligible patients (+ 60 and + 253%, respectively) without increasing the risk of adverse pathological features. CONCLUSIONS The newly developed model has the potential to expand the number of patients eligible for AS without compromising oncologic outcomes. Prospective validation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France. .,Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France. .,Department of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France. .,Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Thierry Roumeguère
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alae Touzani
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Vito Lacetera
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | | | - Romain Diamand
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Guiseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Olivier Windisch
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Benamran
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexandre Fourcade
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Cavale Blanche, CHRU Brest, Brest, France
| | - Gaelle Fiard
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Francesco Sanguedolce
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Oderda
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences - Urology, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, U1151 Inserm-INEM, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris University, Necker, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Laure Charvet
- Department of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Bastien Gondran-Tellier
- Department of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Cyrille Bastide
- Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Lechevallier
- Department of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Service d'urologie Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Equipe 2, Centre d'Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY), Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | | | - Alexandre Peltier
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mari G, Santambrogio G, Crippa J, Cirocchi R, Origi M, Achilli P, Ferrari G, Megna S, Desio M, Cocozza E, Maggioni D, Montroni I, Spinelli A, Zuliani W, Costanzi A, Crestale S, Petri R, Bicelli N, Pedrazzani C, Boccolini A, Taffurelli G, Fingerhut A. 5 year oncological outcomes of the HIGHLOW randomized clinical trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:641-646. [PMID: 36335077 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The oncological outcomes of low ligation (LL) compared to high ligation (HL) of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) during low-anterior rectal resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision are still debated. The aim of this study is to report the 5 year oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic LAR with either HL vs. LL of the IMA MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2014 and December 2016, patients who underwent elective laparoscopic LAR + TME in 6 Italian non-academic hospitals were randomized to HL or LL of IMA after meeting the inclusion criteria (HighLow trial; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02153801). We analyzed the rate of local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival at 5 years of patients previously enrolled. RESULTS Five-year follow up data were available for 196 patients. Recurrence happened in 42 (21.4%) of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the distant recurrence rate (15.8% HL vs. 18.9% LL; P = 0.970) and pelvic recurrence rate (4,9% HL vs 3,2% LL; P = 0.843). No statistically significant difference was found in 5-year OS (p = 0.545), DSS (p = 0.732) or DFS (p = 0.985) between HL and LL. Low vs medium and upper rectum site of tumor, conversion rate, Clavien-Dindo post-operative grade ≥3 complications and tumor stage were found statistically significantly associated to poor oncological outcomes in univariate analysis; in multivariate analysis, however, only conversion rate and stage 3 cancer were found to be independent risk factors for poor DFS at 5 years. CONCLUSION We confirmed the results found in the previous 3-year survival analysis, the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation does not affect OS, DSS and DFS at 5-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Mari
- Colorectal Surgery Unit ASST Brianza, DesioHospital, Desio, Italy.
| | | | - Jacopo Crippa
- Division of Colon& Rectal Surgery, IRCCSHumanitasResearchHospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of General Surgery, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Matteo Origi
- General Surgery Department, Oncological and Mininvasive General Surgery, NiguardaHospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Pietro Achilli
- General Surgery Department, Oncological and Mininvasive General Surgery, NiguardaHospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- General Surgery Department, Oncological and Mininvasive General Surgery, NiguardaHospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Stefano Megna
- Varese General Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASST SetteLaghi, Italy
| | - Matteo Desio
- Varese General Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASST SetteLaghi, Italy
| | - Eugenio Cocozza
- Varese General Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASST SetteLaghi, Italy
| | - Dario Maggioni
- Colorectal Surgery Unit ASST Brianza, DesioHospital, Desio, Italy
| | - Isacco Montroni
- ColorectalSurgery and General Surgery, Ospedale per gli Infermi, Faenza, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano-Milano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele-Milano, Italy
| | - Walter Zuliani
- Humanitas Mater Domini ClinicalInstitute, General Surgery, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Andrea Costanzi
- General Surgery Unit, San Leopoldo Mandic Hospital, Merate, ASST Lecco, Italy
| | - Sara Crestale
- General Surgery Unit, San Leopoldo Mandic Hospital, Merate, ASST Lecco, Italy
| | - Roberto Petri
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Corrado Pedrazzani
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Boccolini
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery AOSP of Terni, Italy
| | | | - Abe Fingerhut
- Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, MedicalUniversity of Graz, Austria and Department of General Surgery, RuijinHospital, ShanghaiJiaoTongUniversitySchool of Medicine, Shanghai Minimally Invasive SurgeryCenter, Shanghai, 200025, PR China
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gomez Ruiz M, Ballestero Diego R, Tejedor P, Cagigas Fernandez C, Cristobal Poch L, Suarez Pazos N, Castillo Diego J. Robotic surgery for locally advanced T4 rectal cancer: feasibility and oncological quality. Updates Surg 2023; 75:589-597. [PMID: 36763301 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01450-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
For T4 rectal tumours and local recurrences (LR) of rectal cancer, a radical resection beyond TME, sometimes by multi-visceral resection, is important to obtain safe margins and improve survival. The use of the laparoscopic approach (LA) for these cases is still controversial and associated with a high rate of conversion. However, robotic surgery might offer some advantages that can overcome some of the limitations of LA. Therefore, we aimed to analyse the postoperative outcomes and medium-term oncological results of robotic surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer (pathological T4) and LR. A retrospective analysis was performed including patients who had undergone robotic rectal resection in a single institution over an 11-year period, and had a T4 tumour confirmed in the pathological report. Primary endpoint was to analyse postoperative complications (30-day) and the rate of conversion. Secondary endpoints include pathological assessment of the quality of the specimen, local recurrence and survival [2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)]. A total of 41 patients were analysed, including a total of 24 patients (60%) that required a multivisceral resection. The median distance from the tumour to the anorectal junction was 7 (4-12) cm. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 2 cases (5%). The overall morbidity rate was 78% (n = 32), with 37% of major complications, most of them urinary (n = 7). Median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 13 (7-27) days. The 30-day mortality rate was 7% (n = 3). An R0 resection was achieved in 85.4% of the cases (n = 35) due to 6 cases of the positive circumferential resection margin. 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for the T4 tumours were 72% and 85%, respectively. There were 8 cases of local recurrence (22.2%); 6 of them met the selection criteria for salvage surgery. Robotic surgery for locally advanced T4 rectal cancer and multi-visceral resections is safe and feasible, with a low rate of conversion and an acceptable rate of postoperative morbidity in this subgroup of patients. Oncological results have shown to be comparable with the laparoscopic series published, preserving a good quality of the resected specimen. However, comparative studies and a longer follow-up period is needed to confirm the oncologic findings and to support the general adoption of the robotic system for these complex interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Gomez Ruiz
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), 39010, Santander, Spain
| | - Roberto Ballestero Diego
- Urology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), 39010, Santander, Spain
| | - Patricia Tejedor
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Carmen Cagigas Fernandez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), 39010, Santander, Spain
| | - Lidia Cristobal Poch
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), 39010, Santander, Spain
| | - Natalia Suarez Pazos
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), 39010, Santander, Spain
| | - Julio Castillo Diego
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), 39010, Santander, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Magoon R, Das D, Jose J. Anesthetic immunomodulation and oncological outcomes: other potential players. Korean J Anesthesiol 2023:kja.23017. [PMID: 36754580 PMCID: PMC10391081 DOI: 10.4097/kja.23017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan Magoon
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences (ABVIMS) and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Baba Kharak Singh Marg, New Delhi 110001, INDIA
| | - Devishree Das
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Cardiothoracic Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, INDIA
| | - Jes Jose
- Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bannerghatta Main Rd, Phase 3, Jayanagara 9th Block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560069
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mellouki A, Bentellis I, Morrone A, Doumerc N, Beauval JB, Roupret M, Nouhaud FX, Lebacle C, Long JA, Chevallier D, Tibi B, Shaikh A, Imbert de la Phalecque L, Pillot P, Tillou X, Bernhard JC, Durand M, Ahallal Y. Evaluation of oncological outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy according to the type of hilar control approach (On-clamp vs Off-clamp), a multicentric study of the French network of research on kidney cancer-UROCCR 58-NCT03293563. World J Urol 2023; 41:287-294. [PMID: 33606044 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03558-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare off-clamp vs on-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in terms of oncological outcomes, and to assess the impact of surgical experience (SE). METHODS We extracted data of a contemporary cohort of 1359 patients from the prospectively maintained database of the French national network of research on kidney cancer (UROCCR). The primary objective was to assess the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate. We also evaluated the oncological outcomes regardless of the surgical experience (SE) by dividing patients into three groups of SE as a secondary endpoints. SE was defined by the caseload of RPN per surgeon per year. For the continuous variables, we used Mann-Whitney and Student tests. We assessed survival analysis according to hilar control approach by Kaplan-Meier curves with log rank tests. A logistic regression multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the independent factors of PSM. RESULTS Outcomes of 224 off-clamp RPN for RCC were compared to 1135 on-clamp RPN. PSM rate was not statistically different, with 5.6% in the off-clamp group, and 11% in the on-clamp group (p = 0.1). When assessing survival analysis for overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LR), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) according to hilar clamping approach, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with p value log rank = 0.2, 0.8, 0.1, respectively. In multivariate analysis assessing SE, hilar control approach, hospital volume (HV), RENAL score, gender, Age, ECOG, EBL, BMI, and indication of NSS, age at surgery was associated with PSM (odds ratio [OR] 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.04), 0.02), whereas SE, HV, and type of hilar control approach were not predictive factors of PSM. CONCLUSION Hilar control approach seems to have no impact on PSM of RPN for RCC. Our findings were consistent with randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adil Mellouki
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, Pasteur II University Hospital, 30 Avenue Romaine, 06001, Nice, France
| | - Imad Bentellis
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, Pasteur II University Hospital, 30 Avenue Romaine, 06001, Nice, France
| | - Arnoult Morrone
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, Pasteur II University Hospital, 30 Avenue Romaine, 06001, Nice, France
| | - Nicolas Doumerc
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Morgane Roupret
- APHP Department of Urology, Bicetre University Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
| | | | - Cedric Lebacle
- APHP Department of Urology, Bicetre University Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
| | | | - Daniel Chevallier
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, Pasteur II University Hospital, 30 Avenue Romaine, 06001, Nice, France
| | - Brannwel Tibi
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, Pasteur II University Hospital, 30 Avenue Romaine, 06001, Nice, France
| | - Aysha Shaikh
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, Pasteur II University Hospital, 30 Avenue Romaine, 06001, Nice, France
| | - L Imbert de la Phalecque
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, Pasteur II University Hospital, 30 Avenue Romaine, 06001, Nice, France
| | - Pierre Pillot
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Xavier Tillou
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | | | - Matthieu Durand
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, Pasteur II University Hospital, 30 Avenue Romaine, 06001, Nice, France
| | - Youness Ahallal
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplant, Pasteur II University Hospital, 30 Avenue Romaine, 06001, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lopez-Lopez V, Krürger JAP, Kuemmerli C, Tohme S, Gómez-Gavara C, Iniesta M, López-Conesa A, Dogeas E, Dalmau M, Brusadin R, Sánchez-Esquer I, Geller DA, Herman P, Robles-Campos R. Long-term oncological outcomes for HALS/Hybrid vs pure laparoscopic approach in colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:3861-3872. [PMID: 36710284 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09873-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALS)/Hybrid and pure laparoscopic (PLS) resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis have focused on short-term results, while long-term oncological outcomes remain understudied. METHODS We established a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study from four centers with experience in minimally invasive surgery between 2004 and 2020. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Other endpoints analyzed were intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize baseline differences. RESULTS A total of 219 HALS/Hybrid (57.8%) and 160 PLS (42.2%) patients were included. After PSM, 155 patients remained in each group. Operative time (182 vs. 248 min, p = 0.012), use of intraoperative ablation (12.3 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.024), positive resection margin (4.5 vs 13.2%, p = 0.012), and pringle time (21 vs. 37 min, p = 0.001) were higher in PLS group. DFS at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years in HALS/Hybrid and PLS groups were 65.4%, 39.3%, 37.5%, and 36.3% vs. 64.9%, 38.0%, 33.1%, and 33.1%, respectively (p = 0.84). OS at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years in HALS/Hybrid and PLS groups were 94.5%, 71.4%, 54.3%, and 46.0% vs. 96.0%, 68.5%, 51.2%, and 41.2%, respectively (p = 0.73). CONCLUSION Our study suggests no differences in long-term oncologic outcomes between the two techniques. We discovered that longer total operative, pringle time, higher rates of intraoperative ablation, and positive resection margins were associated with PLS. These differences in favor of HALS/Hybrid could be due to a shorter learning curve and a greater ability to control hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Lopez-Lopez
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain.
| | - Jaime Arthur Pirola Krürger
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Christopher Kuemmerli
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis-University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Samer Tohme
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Concepción Gómez-Gavara
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona Autonomic University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Iniesta
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain
| | - Asuncion López-Conesa
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Mar Dalmau
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona Autonomic University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roberto Brusadin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ignacio Sánchez-Esquer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain
| | - David A Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Paulo Herman
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ishiyama Y, Tachimori Y, Harada T, Mochizuki I, Tomizawa Y, Ito S, Oneyama M, Amiki M, Hara Y, Narita K, Goto M, Sekikawa K, Hirano Y. Oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic versus open multivisceral resection for local advanced colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:6-12. [PMID: 35568616 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.02.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic (lap) colectomies for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) often require resection of other organs. We systematically reviewed currently available literature on lap multi-visceral resection for CRC, with regard to short- and long-term oncological outcomes, and compared them with open procedures. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and PubMed from inception to November 30, 2020. The aim of this study was to synthesize short-term and oncological outcomes associated with laparoscopic versus open surgery. Pooled proportions and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using an inverse variance method. We included six observational cohort studies published between 2012 and 2020 (lap procedures: n = 262; open procedures: n = 273). Collectively, they indicated that postoperative complications were significantly more common after open surgeries than lap surgeries (RR: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.72; P < 0.00001), but the two approaches did not significantly differ in positive resection margins (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.38-1.50; P = 0.42), local recurrence (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.28-1.62; P = 0.37), or (based on two evaluable studies) 5-year OS (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.46-1.04; P = 0.08) or 5-year DFS (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.67-1.11) for T4b disease. In conclusion, laparoscopic and open multi-visceral resections for advanced CRC have comparable oncologic outcomes. Although a randomized study would be ideal for further research, no such studies are currently available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhiro Ishiyama
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
| | - Yuji Tachimori
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | | | | | - Yuki Tomizawa
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Ito
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Masaki Oneyama
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Manabu Amiki
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Hara
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Narita
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Manabu Goto
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Koji Sekikawa
- Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yasumitu Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Davey MG, Keelan S, Lowery AJ, Kerin MJ. The Impact of Chemotherapy Prescription on Long-Term Survival Outcomes in Early-Stage Invasive Lobular Carcinoma - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 2022; 22:e843-e849. [PMID: 36229335 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILCs) are typically endocrine responsive breast cancers which respond poorly to chemotherapy. The long-term survival advantage of prescribing chemotherapy in such cases remains unclear. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing, the impact of prescribing chemotherapy in such patients on long-term disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival outcomes. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Ten-year DFS and OS were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Time-to-effect modelling was performed using the generic inverse variance method. RESULTS Overall, 9 studies including 28,218 patients were included. The mean follow-up was 74 months (range: 0-150 months) and mean age was 60 years (range: 22-90 years). Of these, 34.7% received chemotherapy (9,797/28,218) and 66.3% did not receive chemotherapy (18,421/28,218). Chemotherapy prescription failed to improve 10-year DFS (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.65-1.23) and OS (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72-1.18). When using time-to-effect modelling, chemotherapy prescription failed to improve DFS (hazard ratio (HR): 1.01, 95% CI: 0.78-1.31) and OS (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.89-1.27, I2= 67%). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis illustrates no long-term survival advantage associated with chemotherapy prescription in the setting of early-stage ILC. In the absence of well-designed, prospective clinical trials evaluating the impact of chemotherapy on long-term outcomes in ILC, these results should be considered by the multidisciplinary team when deciding on the value of systemic chemotherapy prescription in ILC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Davey
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
| | - Stephen Keelan
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland
| | - Aoife J Lowery
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland
| | - Michael J Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Nagano H, Kajitani R, Ohno R, Munechika T, Matsumoto Y, Takahashi H, Aisu N, Kojima D, Yoshimatsu G, Hasegawa S, Kobayashi H, Sugihara K. Comparison of oncological outcomes between low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database in Japan. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:2467-2474. [PMID: 35752499 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains controversial whether the abdominoperineal resection (APR) procedure itself has a negative impact on prognosis compared with sphincter-saving surgery (SSS). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the operation type affects the prognostic outcome in rectal cancer using a multicenter database in Japan. METHODS The study involved 2533 patients who underwent APR or SSS and were registered in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum database, which includes data from 74 centers, between 2003 and 2007. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The secondary endpoints were local recurrence rate (LRR) and pathological radial margin (pRM) status. RESULTS Multivariate analysis identified pathological tumor depth, lymph node status, and pRM status to be associated with oncological outcomes (OS, RFS, LRR). Although the oncological outcomes were worse after APR than after SSS in univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in OS (hazard ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.37) or RFS (hazard ratio 1.06; 95% CI 0.87-1.30) between APR and SSS. There was also no significant difference in LRR (odds ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.70-1.77). Multivariate analysis showed that operation type was associated with positive pRM (odds ratio 3.13, 95% CI 0.18-0.56). CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in oncological outcomes between APR and SSS for rectal cancer. The risk of positive pRM was higher for APR and performing radial margin-negative surgery is an important factor in improving the oncological outcomes of APR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
| | - Ryuji Kajitani
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Ryo Ohno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Taro Munechika
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Naoya Aisu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Daibo Kojima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Gumpei Yoshimatsu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Suguru Hasegawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, 5-1-1 Futago Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 213-8504, Japan
| | - Kenichi Sugihara
- Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Demir DO, Doluoglu OG, Yildiz AK, Kacan T, Yazar VM, Demirbas A, Ozgur BC. Effect of Re-TUR time on recurrence and progression in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. CIR CIR 2022; 90:6-12. [PMID: 36480752 DOI: 10.24875/ciru.21000905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate the significance of time to re-staging transurethral resection (re-TUR) on recurrence and progression rates in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer as a prospective randomized study. METHODS The patients were randomly separated into three groups according to Re-TUR timing. In Groups 1, 2, and 3, the time interval between initial and re-TUR was 14-28 days, 29-42 days, and 43-56 days, respectively. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the effect of time from initial TUR to re-TUR on oncological outcomes. RESULTS Twenty patients in Group 1 (14-28 days), 22 patients in Group 2 (29-42 days), and 29 patients in Group 3 (43-56 days) completed the study. Kaplan-Meier plots showed no differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates between the three groups. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that only tumor number was found to be a prognostic factor on RFS rates. CONCLUSION Our prospective study demonstrated that time laps from initial TUR to re-TUR did not significantly affect on RFS and PFS rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Demirhan O Demir
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Medical Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Omer G Doluoglu
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Medical Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali K Yildiz
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Medical Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Turgay Kacan
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Medical Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Veli M Yazar
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Medical Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Arif Demirbas
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Medical Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berat C Ozgur
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Ankara Training and Research Hospital, University of Medical Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kerin EP, Davey MG, McLaughlin RP, Sweeney KJ, Barry MK, Malone CM, Elwahab SA, Lowery AJ, Kerin MJ. Comparison of the Nottingham Prognostic Index and OncotypeDX© recurrence score in predicting outcome in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Breast 2022; 66:227-235. [PMID: 36335747 PMCID: PMC9647009 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Traditionally, Nottingham prognostic index (NPI) informed prognosis in patients with estrogen receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative, node negative (ER+/HER2-/LN-) breast cancer. At present, OncotypeDX© Recurrence Score (RS) predicts prognosis and response to adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). AIMS To compare NPI and RS for estimating prognosis in ER + breast cancer. METHODS Consecutive patients with ER+/HER2-/LN- disease were included. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS 1471 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 110.7months. NPI was calculable for 1382 patients: 19.8% had NPI≤2.4 (291/1471), 33.0% had NPI 2.41-3.4 (486/1471), 30.0% had NPI 3.41-4.4 (441/1471), 10.9% had NPI 4.41-5.4 (160/1471), and 0.3% had NPI>5.4 (4/1471). In total, 329 patients underwent RS (mean RS: 18.7) and 82.1% had RS < 25 (270/329) and 17.9% had RS ≥ 25 (59/329). Using multivariable Cox regression analyses (n = 1382), NPI independently predicted DFS (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.357, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.140-1.616, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.003, 95% CI: 1.001-1.006, P = 0.024). When performing a focused analysis of those who underwent both NPI and RS (n = 329), neither biomarker predicted DFS or OS. Using Kaplan Meier analyses, NPI category predicted DFS (P = 0.008) and (P = 0.026) OS. Conversely, 21-gene RS group failed to predict DFS (P = 0.187) and OS (P = 0.296). CONCLUSION In our focused analysis, neither NPI nor RS predicted survival outcomes. However, in the entire series, NPI independently predicted both DFS and OS. On the 40th anniversary since its derivation, NPI continues to provide accurate prognostication in breast cancer, outperforming RS in the current study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoin P. Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Matthew G. Davey
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland,Corresponding author. Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
| | | | - Karl J. Sweeney
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Michael K. Barry
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Carmel M. Malone
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Sami Abd Elwahab
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland,Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Aoife J. Lowery
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland,Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Michael J. Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland,Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Aliyev V, Piozzi GN, Bulut A, Guven K, Bakir B, Saglam S, Goksel S, Asoglu O. Robotic vs. laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a case matched study reporting a median of 7-year long-term oncological and functional outcomes. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1851-1860. [PMID: 36198884 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01396-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Aim of this study was to compare operative, long-term oncological and functional outcomes of laparoscopic (LISR) and robotic (RISR) intersphincteric resection in low-lying rectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database was performed. 115 cases (LISR, n = 55; RISR, n = 60) were performed by a single surgeon (January 2011-January 2020). Clinical characteristics did not differ between the groups. Operating time was longer in RISR (160.0 ± 45.7 vs. 205.0 ± 36.5 min, p = 0.035). There was no conversion in RISR, whereas in LISR, two patients (3.6%) converted to open surgery. Complete mesorectum was 61.8% and 83.3% for LISR and RISR (p = 0.046), respectively. Circumferential radial margin involvement was 10.9% and 8.3% in LISR and RISR (p = 0.365), respectively. Median follow-up was 82.8 (30-138) months for LISR and 83.6 (30-138) months for RISR. Three-, five-, and seven-year overall survival rates (OS) for LISR and RISR were: 88.6%, 80.4%, 73.4% and 90.4%, 86.3%, 76.9%, respectively. Three-, five-, and seven-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates for LISR and RISR were 80.5%, 75.2%, 70.4% and 84.4%, 81.4%, 79.8% (p = 0.328), respectively. Three-, five-, and seven-year local recurrence-free survival rates in LISR and RISR were: 96.1%, 92.6%, 88.4% and 96.7%, 94.2%, 90.4% (p = 0.573), respectively. Mean Wexner score for LISR (n = 32) and RISR (n = 40) was: 10.5 ± 4.7 and 9.8 ± 4.2 (p = 0.782), respectively. Colostomy-free survival in LISR and RISR was: 3 years 94.5%/95.2%, 5 years 89.1%/91.7%, and 7 years 83.6%/85.0%. RISR is associated with better mesorectal integrity, no conversion, and lower postoperative complication rate. RISR has longer operation time. Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes are similar in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vusal Aliyev
- Bogazici Academy for Clinical Sciences, General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Alisina Bulut
- Bogazici Academy for Clinical Sciences, General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Koray Guven
- Department of Radiology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Baris Bakir
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sezer Saglam
- Department of Medical Oncology, Demiroglu Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Suha Goksel
- Department of Pathology, Maslak Acibadem Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Oktar Asoglu
- Bogazici Academy for Clinical Sciences, General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ji X, Kang M, Zhao X, Li X, Guo Y, Xie P, Yu Y, Tian Z. Poorly differentiated cluster grade-a vital predictor for lymph node metastasis and oncological outcomes in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:409. [PMID: 36064316 PMCID: PMC9442993 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02492-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background T1 colorectal cancers have a low lymph node metastasis rate and good prognosis. Thus, endoscopic resection is an attractive choice. This study aimed to describe the value of poorly differentiated cluster grade in identifying endoscopically curable T1 colorectal cancers. Methods We included 183 T1 colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify lymph node metastasis predictors. The Akaike information criterion was used to determine whether poorly differentiated cluster grade was the best predictor. Backward regression was used to screen the variables. Survival analyses were conducted to determine the prognostic predictive power of poorly differentiated cluster grade. Correlations among predictors and concordance between our pathologists were also investigated. Results Poorly differentiated cluster grade was an independent predictor for lymph node metastasis (adjusted odds ratio [OR]G 3 = 0.001; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]G 3 = < 0.001, 0.139) in T1 colorectal cancer patients; moreover, it had the best predictive value (AIC = 61.626) among all indicators. It was also screened for inclusion in the predictive model. Accordingly, a high poorly differentiated cluster grade independently indicated shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]G 2 = 4.315; 95% CIG 2 = 1.506, 12.568; HRG 3 = 5.049; 95% CIG 3 = 1.326, 19.222) and disease-free survival (HRG 3 = 6.621; 95% CIG 3 = 1.472, 29.786). Conclusions Poorly differentiated cluster grade is a vital reference to manage T1 colorectal cancer. It could serve as an indicator to screen endoscopically curable T1 colorectal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolin Ji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Mei Kang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Xianzhi Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaoyu Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Yingjie Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Ping Xie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Weicheng District Weifang City Peoples Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China
| | - Yanan Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Zibin Tian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chakra MA, Azoulai D, Moussa M, Ismail K, Peyromaure M, Delongchamps NB, Saighi D, Bailly H, Duquesne I. The prognostic role of pre-cystectomy thrombocytosis in invasive bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 2022; 54:3153-3161. [PMID: 36008697 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03346-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aim to evaluate the impact of preoperative thrombocytosis on oncological outcomes in patients with bladder cancer (BC) who undergo radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS Retrospective data collection of 1092 patients managed by RC for BC from 2 tertiary-care centers was performed. Elevated platelet count (PLT) was defined as > 450 × 109/L. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the impact of thrombocytosis on oncological outcomes. These outcomes were also compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS The median follow-up was 50 months (32-64 months). Thrombocytosis was detected in 18.6% of the patients. The 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with normal PLT count was 92% which was higher than those with elevated PLT count (55%, P < 0.001). Similar results were found for the 6-year CSS with 82% for the no thrombocytosis group and 27% for the thrombocytosis group. Thrombocytosis was still significantly associated with poor prognosis for overall survival and recurrence-free survival (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, CSS was significantly lower in patients with thrombocytosis (HR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.22-2.39, P = 0.002). Patients with elevated PLT counts were also significantly more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy, to have a T stage > pT2b (P = 0.024), to have a positive lymph node, to have variant histology and positive resection margins, and to have concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) on final pathology (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative thrombocytosis was valuable for predicting the oncological outcomes of patients undergoing RC for BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Abou Chakra
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75013, Paris, France.
- Department of Urology, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - David Azoulai
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Mohamad Moussa
- Surgery and Urology Department, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Khadija Ismail
- Epidemiology and Statistic Department, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Michael Peyromaure
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Barry Delongchamps
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Djillali Saighi
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Hugo Bailly
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Igor Duquesne
- Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75013, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tang W, Zhang YF, Zhao YF, Wei XF, Xiao H, Wu Q, Du CY, Qiu JG. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022; 103:106676. [PMID: 35577311 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (l-RAMPS) provides a new surgical approach for patients with pancreatic cancers of the body and tail. However, whether it can achieve comparable outcomes to the open RAMPS (o-RAMPS) remains an issue. METHODS To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of l-RAMPS, the studies in the databases of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library published before September 13, 2021 were searched and a meta-analysis was performed using the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The perioperative and oncological outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Five retrospective cohorts involving 189 patients were included for final pooled analysis. There were no significant differences in the patients' operation time, intra-abdominal bleeding rate, intra-abdominal infection rate, mild morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification = 1), moderate to severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2), overall morbidity, wound infection rate, pancreatic fistula rate, delayed gastric emptying rate, reoperation rate, length of hospital stay, postoperative mortality, R0 resection rate, and 2-year overall survival between the 2 approaches. Besides, l-RAMPS was associated with less blood loss (mean difference (MD) = -232.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -316.93 to -148.46, P < 0.00001) and shorter days until oral feeding (MD = -0.79, 95% CI = -1.35 to -0.22, P = 0.006). However, the pooled analysis also indicated a significantly fewer lymph nodes dissected (MD = -3.01, 95% CI = -5.59 to -0.43, P = 0.02) in l-RAMPS approach. CONCLUSIONS Although l-RAMPS provides similar outcomes associated with benefits of minimal invasiveness compared to o-RAMPS, it harvested significantly fewer lymph nodes which might have potentially negative influence on the patients' long-term survival. L-RAMPS is still in the infancy stage and further investigation is needed to verify its feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China; Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yu-Fei Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yu-Fei Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, the Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Xu-Fu Wei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Heng Xiao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qiao Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Cheng-You Du
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jian-Guo Qiu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rutherford CL, Goodman D, Lannigan A. A systematic literature review of the management, oncological outcomes and psychosocial implications of male breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:2104-2111. [PMID: 35725681 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, accounting for <1% of all breast cancers, it has significant oncological, survival and psychosocial implications for patients. The aim of this study is to assess the latest literature in the diagnosis, management, oncological outcomes, and psychosocial impact of MBC. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al., 2009) [1] to explore the management of MBC, with particular focus on investigative imaging, surgical management, oncological outcomes, survival, genetic screening and psychosocial effects. Electronic databases were searched for randomised control trials, cohort studies and case series involving more than 10 patients. Imaging and surgical techniques, local and distant disease recurrence, survival, genetic screening and psychosocial implications in the setting of MBC were assessed. RESULTS The search criteria identified 199 articles, of which 59 met the inclusion criteria. This included 39,529 patients, with a mean age of 64.5 years (55-71), and a mean follow-up of 66.3 months (26.2-115). Mastectomy remains the most frequently used surgical technique, with an average of 89.6%. Loco-regional and distant recurrence rate was 10.1% and 21.4% respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 and 10 years was 66.8% and 54.5% respectively. Disease-specific survival (DSS) at 5 and 10 years was 87.1% and 67.1% respectively. Overall survival (OS) at 5 and 10 years was 72.7% and 50.7% respectively. Genetic screening was conducted in 38.6% of patients of which 4.8% and 15.8% were found to be BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers respectively. Psychosocial studies were conducted mainly using questionnaire and interview-based methodology focusing primarily on awareness of breast cancer in men, support available and impact on gender identity. CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrates that men present with later stage disease with subsequent impact on survival outcomes. There remains a paucity of high-level evidence and prospective studies are required. There is a need for increasing awareness amongst the public and health care professionals in order to improve outcomes and reduce stigma associated with MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - D Goodman
- National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
| | - A Lannigan
- University Hospital Wishaw, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Scutiero G, Vizzielli G, Taliento C, Bernardi G, Martinello R, Cianci S, Riemma G, Scambia G, Greco P. Influence of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in minimally invasive surgery of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:2112-2118. [PMID: 35725683 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM The endoscopic approach for early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) treatment is considered gold standard. Some authors expressed their concern regarding uterine manipulator (UM) as a risk factor for tumor spillage and dissemination allowing peritoneal or lympho-vascular spaces invasion (LVSI). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of UM on the presence of LVSI, recurrence rate and presence of atypical or malignant peritoneal cytology in patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS We searched electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The pooled results were used to evaluate the association between the use of UM and oncological outcomes. This systematic review was reported according to PRISMA statement 2020. Statistical meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software. RESULTS This systematic review included 18 studies (3 prospective studies, 13 retrospective studies, and 2 RCT). The pooled results showed no significant difference (RR: 0.86, 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.08) in the incidence of LVSI between manipulated hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and between UM group and non-UM group in minimally invasive surgery (RR: 1.18, 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.85), no significant difference in the rate of recurrence (RR: 1.11, 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.74), in the incidence of positive peritoneal cytology between manipulated and non-manipulated hysterectomies in minimally invasive surgery (RR: 1.89, 95% CI, 0.74 to 4.83) and before and after the use of uterine manipulator (RR: 1.21, 95% CI, 0.68 to 2.16). We found a positive association between malignant cytology and hysterectomies in which a uterine manipulator had been used in a sub-group analysis where LH/LAVH were compared to TAH. (RR = 2.26, 95% CI, 1.08-4.71. P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis supports that the use of uterine manipulator for minimally invasive treatment of endometrial cancer does not increase the rate of recurrence and LVSI. Therefore, the opportunity of any other studies on its use in endometrial cancer women should be questioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Scutiero
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - G Vizzielli
- Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
| | - C Taliento
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - G Bernardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - R Martinello
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - S Cianci
- Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "G. Barresi", Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Messina, Italy
| | - G Riemma
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - P Greco
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yu CC, Chen CH, Hong JH, Ke HL, Li WM, Chung SD, Wu WC, Chen YT, Jiang YH, Lin YH, Lin WY, Wu CC, Tsai YC. Comparison of oncological outcomes for hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: results from the Taiwan Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer Collaboration Group. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:4342-4348. [PMID: 34716480 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08779-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) has gradually become the new standard treatment for localized upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). With more blunt dissection and tactile sensation, hand-assisted LNU might shorten the operative time compared with the pure laparoscopic approach. However, whether the use of the hand-assisted or the pure laparoscopic approach has an effect on oncological outcomes remains unclear. METHODS We retrospectively identified 629 patients with non-metastatic UTUC who underwent hand-assisted (n = 515) or pure LNU (n = 114) at 9 hospitals in Taiwan between 2004 and 2019. Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and bladder recurrence-free survival were compared between these two groups using inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) derived from the propensity scores for baseline covariate adjustment. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 32.9 and 28.7 months in the hand-assisted and the pure groups, respectively. IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models showed that the laparoscopic approach (pure vs. hand-assisted) was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49-1.24, p = 0.304), cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51-1.51, p = 0.634), or extra-vesical recurrence (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.41-1.04, p = 0.071). However, the pure laparoscopic approach was significantly associated with lower intra-vescial recurrence (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.96, p = 0.029) for patients who underwent LNU. Kaplan-Meier curves also revealed that the pure laparoscopic approach was associated with better bladder recurrence-free survival compared with the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach in both the original cohort and the IPTW-adjusted cohort (log-rank p = 0.042 and 0.027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The performance of hand-assisted or pure LNU does not significantly affect the all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, or extra-vesical recurrence for patients with non-metastatic UTUC. However, the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach could increase the risk of intra-vesical recurrence for patients who undergo LNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, 289 Jianguo Road, Xindian, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Hua Hong
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Lung Ke
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Shiu-Dong Chung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Graduate Program in Biomedical Informatics, College of Informatics, Yuan-Ze University, Chung-Li, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Postal Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hua Lin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Chemistry, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, 289 Jianguo Road, Xindian, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|