1
|
Quintana-Bertó R, Padilla-Iserte P, Lago V, Tauste C, Díaz-Feijoo B, Cabrera S, Oliver-Pérez R, Coronado PJ, Martín-Salamanca MB, Pantoja-Garrido M, Marcos-Sanmartin J, Cazorla E, Lorenzo C, Rodríguez-Hernández JR, Roldán-Rivas F, Gilabert-Estellés J, Muruzábal JC, Cañada A, Domingo S. Endometrial cancer: predictors and oncological safety of tumor tissue manipulation. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:1098-1105. [PMID: 37668932 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03310-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The main goal of this study is to assess the impact of tumor manipulation on the presence of lympho-vascular space invasion and its influence on oncological results. METHODS We performed a retrospective multi-centric study amongst patients who had received primary surgical treatment for apparently early-stage endometrial cancer. A multivariate statistical analysis model was designed to assess the impact that tumor manipulation (with the use of uterine manipulator or preoperative hysteroscopy) has on lympho-vascular development (LVSI) in the final surgical specimen. RESULTS A total of 2852 women from 15 centers were included and divided into two groups based on the lympho-vascular status in the final surgical specimen: 2265 (79.4%) had no LVSI and 587 (20.6%) presented LVSI. The use of uterine manipulator was associated with higher chances of lympho-vascular involvement regardless of the type used: Balloon manipulator (HR: 95% CI 4.64 (2.99-7.33); p < 0.001) and No-Balloon manipulator ([HR]: 95% CI 2.54 (1.66-3.96); p < 0.001). There is no evidence of an association between the use of preoperative hysteroscopy and higher chances of lympho-vascular involvement (HR: 95% CI 0.90 (0.68-1.19); p = 0.479). CONCLUSION Whilst performing common gynecological procedures, iatrogenic distention and manipulation of the uterine cavity are produced. Our study suggests that the use of uterine manipulator increases the rate of LVSI and, therefore, leads to poorer oncological results. Conversely, preoperative hysteroscopy does not show higher rates of LVSI involvement in the final surgical specimen and can be safely used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Quintana-Bertó
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain.
| | - Pablo Padilla-Iserte
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain
| | - Víctor Lago
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain
| | - Carmen Tauste
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Berta Díaz-Feijoo
- Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Cabrera
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Reyes Oliver-Pérez
- Gynecologic Oncology-Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pluvio J Coronado
- Women's Health Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Pantoja-Garrido
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Josefa Marcos-Sanmartin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante, Spain
- Department of Public Health, Miguel Hernández University, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Alicante, Spain
- Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - Eduardo Cazorla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain
| | - Cristina Lorenzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Nuestra Señora de La Calendaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | | | - Fernando Roldán-Rivas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinico Lozano Blesa Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Juan Gilabert-Estellés
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of València, València, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Muruzábal
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Antonio Cañada
- Department of Biostatistics, Health Research Institute La Fe, València, Spain
| | - Santiago Domingo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cabrera S, Gómez-Hidalgo NR, García-Pineda V, Bebia V, Fernández-González S, Alonso P, Rodríguez-Gómez T, Fusté P, Gracia-Segovia M, Lorenzo C, Chacon E, Roldan Rivas F, Arencibia O, Martí Edo M, Fidalgo S, Sanchis J, Padilla-Iserte P, Pantoja-Garrido M, Martínez S, Peiró R, Escayola C, Oliver-Pérez MR, Aghababyan C, Tauste C, Morales S, Torrent A, Utrilla-Layna J, Fargas F, Calvo A, Aller de Pace L, Gil-Moreno A. ASO Visual Abstract: Accuracy and Survival Outcomes After National Implementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7669-7670. [PMID: 37599299 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14167-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Cabrera
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Natalia R Gómez-Hidalgo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Vicente Bebia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Paula Alonso
- Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tomás Rodríguez-Gómez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
| | - Pere Fusté
- Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Lorenzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Roldan Rivas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Octavio Arencibia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Gran Canarias Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Marina Martí Edo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Soledad Fidalgo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Josep Sanchis
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Pantoja-Garrido
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
| | - Sergio Martínez
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Ricard Peiró
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cecilia Escayola
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, El Pilar Quiron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Reyes Oliver-Pérez
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (i+12), Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Aghababyan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carmen Tauste
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Sara Morales
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Torrent
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Jesus Utrilla-Layna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesc Fargas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Quirón Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Calvo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - Laura Aller de Pace
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cabrera S, Gómez-Hidalgo NR, García-Pineda V, Bebia V, Fernández-González S, Alonso P, Rodríguez-Gómez T, Fusté P, Gracia-Segovia M, Lorenzo C, Chacon E, Roldan Rivas F, Arencibia O, Martí Edo M, Fidalgo S, Sanchis J, Padilla-Iserte P, Pantoja-Garrido M, Martínez S, Peiró R, Escayola C, Oliver-Pérez MR, Aghababyan C, Tauste C, Morales S, Torrent A, Utrilla-Layna J, Fargas F, Calvo A, Aller de Pace L, Gil-Moreno A. Accuracy and Survival Outcomes after National Implementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Stage Endometrial Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7653-7662. [PMID: 37633852 PMCID: PMC10562309 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14065-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has recently been accepted to evaluate nodal status in endometrial cancer at early stage, which is key to tailoring adjuvant treatments. Our aim was to evaluate the national implementation of SLN biopsy in terms of accuracy to detect nodal disease in a clinical setting and oncologic outcomes according to the volume of nodal disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 29 Spanish centers participated in this retrospective, multicenter registry including patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma at preoperative early stage who had undergone SLN biopsy between 2015 and 2021. Each center collected data regarding demographic, clinical, histologic, therapeutic, and survival characteristics. RESULTS A total of 892 patients were enrolled. After the surgery, 12.9% were suprastaged to FIGO 2009 stages III-IV and 108 patients (12.1%) had nodal involvement: 54.6% macrometastasis, 22.2% micrometastases, and 23.1% isolated tumor cells (ITC). Sensitivity of SLN biopsy was 93.7% and false negative rate was 6.2%. After a median follow up of 1.81 years, overall surivial and disease-free survival were significantly lower in patients who had macrometastases when compared with patients with negative nodes, micrometastases or ITC. CONCLUSIONS In our nationwide cohort we obtained high sensitivity of SLN biopsy to detect nodal disease. The oncologic outcomes of patients with negative nodes and low-volume disease were similar after tailoring adjuvant treatments. In total, 22% of patients with macrometastasis and 50% of patients with micrometastasis were at low risk of nodal metastasis according to their preoperative risk factors, revealing the importance of SLN biopsy in the surgical management of patients with early stage EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Cabrera
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Natalia R Gómez-Hidalgo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Vicente Bebia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Paula Alonso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tomás Rodríguez-Gómez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
| | - Pere Fusté
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Lorenzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Roldan Rivas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Octavio Arencibia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Gran Canarias Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Marina Martí Edo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Soledad Fidalgo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Josep Sanchis
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - Pablo Padilla-Iserte
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Politécnico Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Manuel Pantoja-Garrido
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Sergio Martínez
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Ricard Peiró
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cecilia Escayola
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, El Pilar Quiron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Reyes Oliver-Pérez
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (i+12), Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Aghababyan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carmen Tauste
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Sara Morales
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Torrent
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Jesus Utrilla-Layna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesc Fargas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Quirón Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Calvo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - Laura Aller de Pace
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oliver-Perez MR, Padilla-Iserte P, Arencibia-Sanchez O, Martin-Arriscado C, Muruzabal JC, Diaz-Feijóo B, Cabrera S, Coronado P, Martín-Salamanca MB, Pantoja-Garrido M, Marcos-Sanmartin J, Cabezas-López E, Lorenzo C, Beric D, Rodriguez-Hernandez JR, Roldan-Rivas F, Gilabert-Estelles J, Sanchez L, Laseca-Modrego M, Tauste-Rubio C, Gil-Ibañez B, Tejerizo-Garcia A. Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer (LySEC): Patterns of Recurrence and Predictors. A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study of the Spain Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092612. [PMID: 37174081 PMCID: PMC10177148 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The main aim is to compare oncological outcomes and patterns of recurrence of patients with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer according to lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) status. The secondary objective is to determine preoperative predictors of LVSI. We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study. A total of 3546 women diagnosed with postoperative early-stage (FIGO I-II, 2009) endometrioid endometrial cancer were included. Co-primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and pattern of recurrence. Cox proportional hazard models were used for time-to-event analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistical regression models were employed. Positive LVSI was identified in 528 patients (14.6%) and was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 1.8), OS (HR 2.1) and distant recurrences (HR 2.37). Distant recurrences were more frequent in patients with positive LVSI (78.2% vs. 61.3%, p < 0.01). Deep myometrial invasion (OR 3.04), high-grade tumors (OR 2.54), cervical stroma invasion (OR 2.01), and tumor diameter ≥ 2 cm (OR 2.03) were independent predictors of LVSI. In conclusion, in these patients, LVSI is an independent risk factor for shorter DFS and OS, and distant recurrence, but not for local recurrence. Deep myometrial invasion, cervical stroma invasion, high-grade tumors, and a tumor diameter ≥ 2 cm are independent predictors of LVSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Reyes Oliver-Perez
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Padilla-Iserte
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Octavio Arencibia-Sanchez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Materno-Infantil de Canarias, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Cristina Martin-Arriscado
- Scientific Support Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Muruzabal
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Berta Diaz-Feijóo
- Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Cabrera
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pluvio Coronado
- Women's Health Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, School of Medicine, Complutense University Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Pantoja-Garrido
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, 41009 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Josefa Marcos-Sanmartin
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, 03010 Alicante, Spain
- Department of Public Health, Miguel Hernandez University, Sant Joan D'Alacant, 03550 Alicante, Spain
- Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain
| | - Elena Cabezas-López
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Lorenzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Calendaria, 38010 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Duska Beric
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrevieja, 03186 Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Fernando Roldan-Rivas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinico Lozano Blesa Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Juan Gilabert-Estelles
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain
| | - Lourdes Sanchez
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University General Hospital of Ciudad Real, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Maria Laseca-Modrego
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Materno-Infantil de Canarias, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Carmen Tauste-Rubio
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Blanca Gil-Ibañez
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro Tejerizo-Garcia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (i+12), 28041 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quintana-Bertó R, Padilla-Iserte P, Gil-Moreno A, Oliver-Pérez R, Coronado PJ, Martín-Salamanca MB, Pantoja-Garrido M, Lorenzo C, Beric D, Gilabert-Estellés J, Sánchez L, Roldán-Rivas F, Díaz-Feijoo B, Rodríguez-Hernández JR, Marcos-Sanmartin J, Muruzábal JC, Cañada A, Domingo S. Preoperative sampling in endometrial cancer: evaluation of the histopathological agreement with definitive surgical specimen. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:2388-2394. [PMID: 35984612 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02893-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The main goal of this study is to assess the diagnostic agreement between preoperative biopsy and definitive histology of the surgical specimen to determine which sampling method is most suitable for diagnosis of early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS We performed a retrospective multicentric study to assess the correlation between three endometrial sampling methods (hysteroscopy, pipelle and D&C) in patients who had undergone preoperative endometrial biopsy and received primary surgical treatment for endometrial cancer. The primary objective was the agreement rate between hysteroscopy (HSC), endometrial biopsy (pipelle) and dilatation and curettage (D&C). RESULTS A total of 1833 women who underwent preoperative sampling at 15 centers were included: 1042 biopsies were performed by HSC, 703 by pipelle and 88 by D&C. All three methods presented a moderate diagnostic concordance (κ = 0.40-0.61) with the definitive specimen's histology: HSC (κ = 0.47), pipelle sampling (κ = 0.48) and D&C (κ = 0.48). Likewise, a subgroup analysis was performed by histological subtype comparing HSC and endometrial biopsy, showing that neither is superior as a diagnostic method. CONCLUSIONS According to this study, the use of pipelle sampling could become an adequate diagnostic method in endometrial cancer due to its similar agreement to HSC, ease of use and affordability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Quintana-Bertó
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Av. Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Pablo Padilla-Iserte
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Av. Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Reyes Oliver-Pérez
- Gynecologic Oncology-Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pluvio J Coronado
- Women's Health Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC University Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Pantoja-Garrido
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
| | - Cristina Lorenzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Hospital, Nuestra Señora de la Calendaria, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Duska Beric
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain
| | - Juan Gilabert-Estellés
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of València, València, Spain
| | - Lourdes Sánchez
- Gynaecology and Obstetrics Department, University General Hospital of Ciudad Real, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
| | - Fernando Roldán-Rivas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinico Lozano Blesa Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Berta Díaz-Feijoo
- Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juan Carlos Muruzábal
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Antonio Cañada
- Department of Biostatistics, Health Research Institute La Fe, València, Spain
| | - Santiago Domingo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Av. Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Quintana-Bertó R, Padilla-Iserte P, Gil-Moreno A, Oliver-Pérez R, Coronado PJ, Martín-Salamanca MB, Pantoja-Garrido M, Lorenzo C, Cazorla E, Gilabert-Estellés J, Sánchez L, Roldán-Rivas F, Díaz-Feijoo B, Rodríguez-Hernández JR, Marcos-Sanmartin J, Muruzábal JC, Cañada A, Domingo S. Oncological safety of hysteroscopy in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:ijgc-2022-003586. [PMID: 35882425 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It has been suggested that the manipulation of neoplastic tissue during hysteroscopy may lead to dissemination of tumor cells into the peritoneal cavity and worsen prognosis and overall survival. The goal of this study was to assess the oncological safety comparing hysteroscopy to Pipelle blind biopsy in the presurgical diagnosis of patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS We performed a retrospective multicentric study among patients who had received primary surgical treatment for endometrial cancer. A multivariate statistical analysis model was used to compare relapse and survival rates in patients who had been evaluated preoperatively either by hysteroscopy or Pipelle biopsy. The relapse rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival were assessed as the main outcomes. The histological type, tumor size, myometrial invasion, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, surgical approach, use of a uterine manipulator, and adjuvant treatment were also included in the analysis. RESULTS A total of 1731 women from 15 centers were included: 1044 in the hysteroscopy group and 687 in the Pipelle sampling group. 225 patients relapsed during the 10 year follow-up period: 139 (13.3%) in the hysteroscopy group and 86 (12.4%) in the Pipelle sampling group. There is no evidence of an association between the use of hysteroscopy as a diagnostic method and relapse rate (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.66; p=0.16), lower disease-free survival (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.66; p=0.15), or overall survival (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.29; p=0.76). CONCLUSION Hysteroscopy is a safe diagnostic method for patients with endometrial cancer with no impact on oncological outcomes when compared with sampling by Pipelle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Quintana-Bertó
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain
| | - Pablo Padilla-Iserte
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Reyes Oliver-Pérez
- Gynecologic Oncology-Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pluvio J Coronado
- Women's Health Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC University Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Pantoja-Garrido
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
| | - Cristina Lorenzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Calendaria, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Eduardo Cazorla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrevieja, Torrevieja, Spain
| | - Juan Gilabert-Estellés
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of València, València, Spain
| | - Lourdes Sánchez
- Gynaecology and Obstetrics Department, University General Hospital of Ciudad Real, Castilla la Mancha, Spain
| | - Fernando Roldán-Rivas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinico Lozano Blesa Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Berta Díaz-Feijoo
- Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juan Carlos Muruzábal
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Antonio Cañada
- Department of Biostatistics, Health Research Institute La Fe València Spain, Valencia, Spain
| | - Santiago Domingo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, València, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brenner-Anidjar RD, Rojo-Novo S, Frías-Sánchez Z, Montaño-Serrano M, Pantoja-Rosso FJ, Terracina D, Pantoja-Garrido M. Palmer's test usefulness in the correct positioning of the Veress needle and the reduction of complications during laparoscopic access maneuvers. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47:576-582. [PMID: 33118305 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM Abdominal cavity access accounts for 50% of complications during laparoscopic surgery. Different safety maneuvers have been used to try to diminish these. Our study aims to establish the usefulness of Palmer's test in the correct positioning of the Veress needle and the reduction of complications during laparoscopic access maneuvers, when used in addition to the determination of intraabdominal pressure. METHODS Prospective observational analytic multi-centered cohort study with 370 patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy between July 2014 and November 2019, comparing the additional use of Palmer's test in 185 patients (Palmer-Test-Yes, PTY), with intraabdominal pressure determination alone in 185 patients (Palmer-Test-No, PTN). RESULTS Intergroup homogeneity was described for the basic characteristics of both population samples, except for mean age and percentage of previous laparotomy. A total of 19 complications were recorded, 10 in PTY and 9 in PTN, with no significant differences (P = 0.814). No differences were found in the analysis of these complications, except for the rate of conversion to laparotomy, which occurred four times in the PTY group and none in PTN (P = 0.044). Furthermore, no differences were found once fixed for the history of previous laparotomy (P = 514.), nor for the percentage of successful access after the first attempt between both groups (P = 0.753). CONCLUSION Palmer's test, when used in addition to intraabdominal pressure determination, has not shown to be effective in preventing failed access to abdominal cavity or reducing complications associated with access maneuvers with the Veress needle. Hence, its systematic use is not justified, since it could generate a sense of false security.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Rojo-Novo
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - Zoraida Frías-Sánchez
- Gynecology and Breast Pathology Unit, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - María Montaño-Serrano
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Hospitalet Hospital and Quiron Salud-Barcelona Hospital, Autonoma University of Barcelona, UAB, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Dan Terracina
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Padilla-Iserte P, Lago V, Tauste C, Díaz-Feijoo B, Gil-Moreno A, Oliver R, Coronado P, Martín-Salamanca MB, Pantoja-Garrido M, Marcos-Sanmartin J, Gilabert-Estellés J, Lorenzo C, Cazorla E, Roldán-Rivas F, Rodríguez-Hernández JR, Sánchez L, Muruzábal JC, Hervas D, Domingo S. Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224:65.e1-65.e11. [PMID: 32693096 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data available to indicate whether oncological outcomes might be influenced by the uterine manipulator, which is used at the time of hysterectomy for minimally invasive surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. The current evidence derives from retrospective studies with limited sample sizes. Without substantial evidence to support its use, surgeons are required to make decisions about its use based only on their personal choice and surgical experience. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the use of the uterine manipulator on oncological outcomes after minimally invasive surgery, for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. STUDY DESIGN We performed a retrospective multicentric study to assess the oncological safety of uterine manipulator use in patients with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer, treated with minimally invasive surgery. The type of manipulator, surgical staging, histology, lymphovascular space invasion, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, adjuvant treatment, recurrence, and pattern of recurrence were evaluated. The primary objective was to determine the relapse rate. The secondary objective was to determine recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and the pattern of recurrence. RESULTS A total of 2661 women from 15 centers were included; 1756 patients underwent hysterectomy with a uterine manipulator and 905 without it. Both groups were balanced with respect to histology, tumor grade, myometrial invasion, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, and adjuvant therapy. The rate of recurrence was 11.69% in the uterine manipulator group and 7.4% in the no-manipulator group (P<.001). The use of the uterine manipulator was associated with a higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.20; P=.006). The use of uterine manipulator in uterus-confined endometrial cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] I-II) was associated with lower disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.97; P=.027) and higher risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.83; P=.026). No differences were found regarding the pattern of recurrence between both groups (chi-square statistic, 1.74; P=.63). CONCLUSION In this study, the use of a uterine manipulator was associated with a worse oncological outcome in patients with uterus-confined endometrial cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics I-II) who underwent minimally invasive surgery. Prospective trials are essential to confirm these results.
Collapse
|
9
|
Fernández-Ruiz M, Pantoja-Garrido M, Frías-Sánchez Z, Rodríguez-Jiménez I, Aguilar-Martín MDV. Epidermoid carcinoma in the neovagina of a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Case report and literature review. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2019; 70:266-276. [PMID: 32142241 DOI: 10.18597/rcog.3328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Objective To present the case of a squamous carcinoma in the neovagina of a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and review of the literature related to treatment and prognosis of vaginal neoplasms or HPV infection in transgender women or with MRKH syndrome. Materials and methods A 56-year-old woman consulted to the Hospital Universitario of Sevilla (Spain). During the clinical examination, a exophytic tumor at the bottom of the vagina was found and the biopsy reported squamous carcinoma and positive nucleic acid amplification test for human papilloma (HPV) type 16. A literature search of case reports, case series and observational studies published from 2000 to October 2019 in English and Spanish was performed in Medline via PubMed, with the follow- ing terms: "congenital abnormalities"; "Mullerian aplasia"; "neovagina"; "Vaginal neoplasms"; "Squamous carcinoma"; "HPV infection" was performed. Results 14 studies were finally included; seven corresponded to squamous cell carcinoma, three to adenocarcinoma and four reported HPV infection only. All of the squamous cell carcinomas were at advanced stages due to local or lymphatic compro- mise and received radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy or radical surgery. The prognosis was bad in three of the cases. Patients with adenocarcinoma also presented with advanced lesions due to local extensión and received surgical treatment and two cases received concomitant chemotherapy. Only one patient was followed-up for five years or more. HPV infection is common in women who underwent neovagina reconstruction. Conclusions Patients with neovagina are susceptible to develope squamous carcinomas or adenocarcinomas depending if skin or intestinal tissue grafts are used. According to local compromise at the time of diagnosis, radical or combined treatments are required. Which screening strategies for HPV, squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinoma is to be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Fernández-Ruiz
- Servicio de Ginecología del Hospital general Santa María del Puerto (Cádiz), España
| | - Manuel Pantoja-Garrido
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Obstetricia y Ginecología del Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena de Sevilla (España)
| | - Zoraida Frías-Sánchez
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Ginecología del Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío de Sevilla (España)
| | - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Jiménez
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Obstetricia y Ginecología del Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena de Sevilla (España)
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Frías-Sánchez Z, Pantoja-Garrido M, Gutiérrez-Domingo Á, Jiménez-Gallardo J, Polo-Velasco A, Rodríguez-Jiménez I. Adenosarcoma de alto grado de endocérvix y cavidad endometrial con componente heterólogo de rabdomiosarcoma. Reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2019; 70:122-128. [PMID: 31613077 DOI: 10.18597/rcog.3258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Objective To present the case of a patient diagnosed with high grade adenosarcoma of the endocervix and the endometrial cavity, with a heterologous component, and to conduct a review of the literature focusing on the diagnosis and therapeutic management of this disease condition. Materials and methods We present the case of a 31-year-old female patient who came to Virgen Macarena University Hospital of Seville, a Level III regional institution, complaining of genital bleeding arising from an endocervical polypoid mass. The biopsy of the mass revealed a high grade, poorly differentiated leiomyosarcoma of the endocervix. The patient was taken later to total abdominal hysterectomy. The study of the surgical specimen provided the following result: adenosarcoma of the endocervix and endometrial cavity with a heterologous rhabdomyosarcoma component. A search was conducted in the Medline database via Pubmed using the terms "adenosarcoma," "endocervical," "cervix," "uterus," "heterologous." The search in- cluded literature review articles, case reports and clinical case series describing aspects of cervical adenosarcoma and the heterologous rhabdomyosar- coma component, published in English and Spanish since 1974. Results Six articles corresponding to literature reviews, case reports or case series in which the most relevant aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of this disease condition are described were retrieved. Conclusions This condition is characterized, on occasions, by rapid and aggresive growth, hence the importance of early diagnosis and optimal treatment based on a combination of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. However, due to its low prevalence, further studies are needed in order to confirm these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoraida Frías-Sánchez
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Obstetricia y Ginecología del Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla (España)
| | - Manuel Pantoja-Garrido
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Obstetricia y Ginecología del Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla (España)
| | | | - Julián Jiménez-Gallardo
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Obstetricia y Ginecología del Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla (España)
| | - Alfredo Polo-Velasco
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Obstetricia y Ginecología del Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla (España)
| | - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Jiménez
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Obstetricia y Ginecología del Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla (España)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alcalá-Alcalde MM, Pantoja-Garrido M, Frías-Sánchez Z. [Primary intestinal parasitic fibroid, an incidental finding during gynecological laparoscopic surgery]. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2016; 84:593-600. [PMID: 29424980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine fibroids are the most frequent solid pelvic benign tumors in women. Their most common location is the uterine corpus, cervix and broad ligament but they can also be found in other areas, less commonly as extragenital locations and/or in a parasitic way. CLINICAL CASE A 40 years old patient, who consulted for menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea on long evolution. On physical examination, the enlarged uterus, inflamated, hard consistency and normal mobility was identified. The sonographic features and location suggested a fibroid nodule type II (Wamsteker classification), which deformed the endometrial cavity. It was decided to perform the surgery and during the procedure the enlarged uterus, deformed at the expense of a localized fundal formation, like a intramural fibroid. By mobilizing the intestinal loops and change the position of the patient (Trendelenburg) a solid tumor, cranially separated from the internal genitals it was observed. In reviewing the insertion site, it was visualized that remained attached to antimesial of the jejunum. Total hysterectomy was performed with monopolar and bipolar energy, and vascular sealant. The postoperative was favorable, without complication. The pathological study reported a primary leiomyoma of the small intestine, while in the uterus of multiple myomas was confirmed. CONCLUSIÓN The parasitic fibroids are those located separately from the uterus that receive vascular irrigation from another organ or abdominopelvic structure. They are a very rare pathology. The diagnosis has made as an accidental event, during an abdominal surgery or during the differential diagnosis of a abdominopelvic tumor. The therapeutical choice depends on the clinical presentation, the location of the fibroid and the reproductive desires of the patient, most commonly recomending their surgycal removal.
Collapse
|