Long-term outcomes of anastomotic urethroplasty for radiation-induced strictures

Long-term follow-up suggests high satisfaction rates for bulbomembranous radiation-induced urethral stenoses treated with anastomotic urethroplasty

PURPOSE

To analyze patients who underwent anastomotic urethroplasty for radiationinduced bulbomembranous urethral stricture/stenosis (RIS) due to prostate cancer treatment with up to 19 years of follow-up and assess long-term patient reported outcomes (PROMs). Long-term follow-up with the inclusion of urethroplasty specific PROMs is lacking in the available research.

METHODS

Patients who underwent anastomotic urethroplasty for RIS were identified from 2002 to 2020. Inclusion criteria included completion of 4-month post-operative cystoscopy and PROMs including IPSS, SHIM, MSHQ-EF, 6Q-LUTS, and global satisfaction queries at 4 months. PROMs were assessed annually thereafter, and cystoscopy was performed for adverse change in PROMs or worsening uroflow/PVR parameters. PROMs were compared at pre-op, post-op, and most recent follow-up.

RESULTS

23 patients met inclusion criteria. Short-term anatomic success was 95.7%. At a mean follow-up of 73.1 months (9.1-228.9), one late recurrence occurred for an overall success of 91.3%. Significant and sustained objective improvement was identified in voiding scores, quality of life, and urethroplasty specific PROMs. Satisfaction was 91.3% despite sexual side effects, and 95.7% of patients stated they would have surgery again knowing their outcome at a mean of over 6 years' follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

RIS are challenging problems, but durable symptomatic relief is achievable in well-selected patients. Patients with bulbomembranous RIS should be appropriately counseled regarding the risk of urinary incontinence and sexual side effects after anastomotic urethroplasty. However, long-term success is high, and overall QoL will have sustained subjective improvement in most cases.

Race as a Predictor of Recurrence and Complications After Urethroplasty in Men With Urethral Stricture Disease

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of race in surgical outcomes of and complications after urethroplasty.

METHODS

A single institution, retrospective review was conducted from 2011 to 2019 on male patients ≥18 years of age who underwent urethroplasty. Exclusion criteria included previous urethral cancer, lack of follow up, or revision urethroplasty. Failure of urethroplasty was defined as requiring revision surgery or recurrence on imaging or cystoscopy. Risk factors for recurrence were determined using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon comparisons, and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seven patients were identified with 234 patients meeting inclusion criteria. 63.2% identified as White/Caucasian (CA), 32.5% Black/African American (AA), and 4.3% other race. Mean age was 49.4 years. Between CA and AA patients, there was no difference in mean age, body mass index, smoking status, prior urethroplasty, or prior dilation/DVIU. CAs were more likely to have a fossa navicularis stricture compared to AAs (P = .0094), but there were no significant differences in bulbar, penile, or posterior stricture rates (all P >.05) or length (P = .32). The overall stricture recurrence rate was 15.8% with a median of 242 days to recurrence and no significant difference by race for either outcome (P = .83, P = .64). The only predictor of stricture recurrence was prior dilation/DVIU (P = .0404, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0, 5.6). Overall complication rate was 17.5%, with no difference between CA and AAs rates (P = .83) or complication type (P = .62).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical failure for urethral stricture repair based on race. The only predictor of surgical failure was having a prior urethral dilation/DVIU.

Update on the management of complex strictures of the bulbar urethra

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This narrative review summarizes the most relevant literature published in 2019-2020 regarding urethroplasty for bulbar strictures.

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified relevant papers focussing on new insights in the field of excision and primary anastomosis, graft augmentation urethroplasty and perineostomy for bulbar strictures and bulbomembranous strictures after radiotherapy or surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

SUMMARY

Respecting the vascularity of the anterior urethra and maintaining the integrity of surrounding structures during bulbar urethroplasty does not appear to deteriorate surgical outcomes and might be associated with improved functional outcomes.

Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms after Prostate Radiation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present urologists with guidance on how to approach and manage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients who have undergone radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are few studies that specifically examine treatment approaches for LUTS in patients who have undergone prostate cancer RT. LUTS after prostate RT are unique when compared to de novo LUTS. Understanding these distinctions is important for urologists' practice as well as patients' quality of life. Discussion of the risks and management of post-RT LUTS should be included in the shared decision-making process when counseling patients on various treatment options for prostate cancer. Further studies evaluating treatments for storage and voiding symptoms after RT are needed to help guide future care.

A multi-institutional critical assessment of dorsal onlay urethroplasty for post-radiation urethral stenosis

PURPOSE

To critically evaluate a multi-institutional patient cohort undergoing Dorsal-Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty (D-BMGU) for recurrent post-radiation posterior urethral stenosis.

METHODS

Retrospective multi-institutional review of patients with posterior urethral stenosis from 10 institutions between 2010-2019 was performed. Patients with at least 1-year follow-up were assessed. Patient demographics, stenosis characteristics, peri-operative outcomes, and post-operative clinical and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were stenosis recurrence and de-novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Secondary outcomes were changes in voiding, sexual function, and patient-reported satisfaction.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine men with post-radiation urethral stenosis treated with D-BMGU met inclusion criteria. Median age and stenosis length were 72 years, (IQR 66-75), and 3.0 cm (IQR 2.5-4 cm), respectively. Radiation modalities included: 36 (45.6%) external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 13 (16.5%) brachytherapy (BT), 10 (12.7%) combination EBRT/BT, and 20 (25.3%) EBRT/radical prostatectomy. At a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 13-40), 14 patients (17.7%) had stenosis recurrence. Among 37 preoperatively-continent patients, 3 men (8.1%) developed de-novo SUI following dorsal onlay urethroplasty. Of 29 patients with preoperative SUI all but one remained incontinent post-operatively (96.6%). Following repair, patients experienced significant improvement in PVR (92.5 to 26 cc, p = 0.001) and Uroflow (4.6 to 15.9 cc/s, p = 0.001), and high overall satisfaction, with 91.9% reporting a GRA of + 2 or better).

CONCLUSION

Dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty is a safe and feasible technique in patients with post-radiation posterior urethral stenosis. This non-transecting approach may confer low rates of de-novo SUI. Further research is needed to compare this technique with excisional urethroplasty.